Quantcast
Channel: Bharatkalyan97
Viewing all 11099 articles
Browse latest View live

China to 'deepen the struggle' against Dalai Lama -- Yu Zhengsheng

$
0
0

Dalai LamaChina vows to 'deepen the struggle' against Dalai Lama

Yu Zhengsheng's comments indicate China's new government has not softened stance towards exiled Tibetan leader
  • guardian.co.ukThe comments by Yu Zhengsheng appeared aimed at thwarting speculation that China’s leadership could take a softer line on the Dalai Lama (pictured). Photograph: Aijaz Rahi/AP
China's leading official in charge of religious groups and ethnic minorities has vowed to step up the fight against the Dalai Lama, as a rights group reported police have shot monks marking the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader's birthday.
The comments by Yu Zhengsheng, number four in the Communist party hierarchy, appeared aimed at thwarting speculation that China's new leadership could take a softer line on the Dalai Lama. Beijing considers the Dalai Lama, who fled China in 1959 after an abortive uprising against Chinese rule, to be a violent separatist. The Dalai Lama, who is based in India, says he is merely seeking greater autonomy for his Himalayan homeland.
Visiting a heavily Tibetan area of the western province of Gansu,
Yu told officials and religious leaders that the Dalai Lama's activities ran counter to the country's interests and to Buddhist tradition. "For the sake of national unity and the development of stability in Tibetan regions, we must take a clear-cut stand and deepen the struggle against the Dalai clique."
Buddhist leaders must be guided to oppose separatism and any efforts to damage the Communist party's leadership, added Yu, who is head of a largely ceremonial advisory body to parliament that aims to co-opt religious and minority groups.
Yu repeated that ties with the Dalai Lama would improve if he openly recognised that Tibet had been a part of China since ancient times and abandoned his Tibetan independence activities, the official news agency Xinhua reported.
"The Dalai Lama's 'middle way' aimed at achieving so-called 'high-degree autonomy' in 'Greater Tibet' is completely opposite to China's constitution and the country's system of regional ethnic autonomy," Yu added, according to Xinhua.
Speculation China would take a softer line towards the Dalai Lama had been fuelled in part by an essay written by a scholar from the Central Party School, who said that China could take some steps toward resuming talks with the Dalai Lama's representatives, which broke down in 2010.
Rights groups also say there has been some discussion about lifting restrictions on public displays of the Dalai Lama's picture in his birthplace of Qinghai province.
Yet some Tibet experts remained sceptical that the reports indicated a change in policy. "I think a lot of the reports ran away with themselves, and began to produce a narrative that was way, way ahead of the story," said Robbie Barnett, head of the Modern Tibetan Studies Program at Columbia University.
Despite a heavy security presence, protests and resistance against Chinese rule in Tibetan areas have continued. Police in a restive Tibetan part of Sichuan province opened fire on a group of monks and others celebrating the Dalai Lama's birthday at the weekend, seriously injuring at least two, the US-based International Campaign for Tibet said.
While Chinese security forces often use heavy-handed tactics to stop protests in Tibetan regions, they rarely use guns.
Officials reached by telephone in Ganzi said they had no knowledge of the incident.
China's foreign ministry said it was also unaware of the reports, but said the Dalai Lama was using the opportunity of his birthday to promote his separatist agenda.
At least 119 Tibetans have set themselves alight in protest against Chinese rule since 2009, mostly in heavily Tibetan areas of Sichuan, Gansu and Qinghai provinces rather than in what China terms the Tibet Autonomous Region. Most have died from their injuries.
Beijing has responded to the wave of self-immolations by tightening its control over the area. Analysts say that its means of pre-empting unrest have grown increasingly sophisticated in recent years, with the implementation of elaborate surveillance networks and mass resettlement programmes.
Authorities have forcibly relocated more than 2 million rural Tibetans into government-built housing complexes over the past seven years, the New York-based Human Rights Watch said in a report released last month, dealing a severe blow to their traditional way of life and leaving them with few economic prospects.
In a statement, the group's China director, Sophie Richardson, called the scope of the relocations "unprecedented in the post-Mao era".
"Tibetans have no say in the design of polices that are radically altering their way of life, and – in an already highly repressive context – no ways to challenge them," she said.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/09/china-deepen-struggle-dalai-lama

Pipilikar pakha gojaye moribar tore (Ants grow wings before death) -- Pronab Mondal

$
0
0
Wednesday , July 10 , 2013 |

Left with an ant-eaten promise

Pipilikar pakha gojaye moribar tore (Ants grow wings before death)

Subhendu Adhikari, Trinamul MP at a campaign meeting in West Midnapore on Tuesday, predicting the fate of the Opposition in the panchayat polls and moving on to target state election commissioner Mira Pande.

Trinamul speakers take care to say what their leader wants to hear on the campaign trail but “ants” need not be an apt metaphor, certainly not at Joram in West Midnapore that votes on Thursday.
BACK TO THE TAMARIND TREE, 19 YEARS ON
Back in 1994, Mamata Banerjee had sat under a tamarind tree in the middle of this village of tribals, sharing a plate of fried ant eggs with them as she listened to their tale of wretched deprivation.

Madan Sabar, who fried the ant eggs and served them to Mamata, is no more.
Little else has changed in Joram since that day 19 years ago when Mamata, then a young Congress MP, promised the villagers that if she ever came to power, she would see to it that they had a better life.

The nearest health centre is 15km away. The nearest ration shop is three hours away by foot.
When the rice bought from the ration shop runs out, roots are plucked from the forest and boiled. A solitary well is the lone source of drinking water.

Yes, they still fry eggs, mash them with onion slices and green chilli because that is one of the few — if not the only — sources of protein.

A sharp observer such as the chief minister may notice one more change: the villagers have also started selling the eggs to people in nearby villages who cannot afford other providers of protein.

There is another reason for the trade in eggs: the village cannot plant crops more than once in a year because of lack of irrigation facilities — a telling statement in a state ruled by a party that puts farming and fertile land above everything else.

So touched was Mamata in 1994 that in a book she wrote the following year, Upalabdhi(Realisation), she referred to her experience in the Jungle Mahal village to highlight the failures of Left rule.

Two days before the village votes in the first phase of the panchayat elections, Rupchand Sardar, 69, stood under the same tamarind tree as he recounted what he remembered of Mamata’s visit 19 years ago.

“I sat next to her and told her how difficult it was for us to eke out a living.” The Left Front government had done “nothing” for them. “She listened. I got the feeling that she felt our suffering.”

Sardar said many in the village had expected matters would improve when Mamata became Bengal’s chief minister two years ago and spelt out her promises for Jungle Mahal.

He pointed to a house. “That’s Madan’s house. That is where Madan fried the ant eggs and served them to Mamata. Madan is dead and so it appears are Mamata’s promises.”

Little has changed, he said. “There is hardly any farming here, only one crop a year, because there is no irrigation system. If anyone falls ill, we have to hire a car for Rs 300 to reach the nearest health centre in Belpahari, 15km away. We are poor people, with hardly enough to eat, from where will we get this money?”

In the nearby Chakadoba village, too, expectations from the Trinamul government are no different. But the only paribartan she has seen in the past two years, said Rekha Murmu, standing at her doorstep, was that some moram (red gravel) had been sprinkled on the mud path in front of her house.

“We had a lot of expectations from the new government,” said the 28-year-old. But except the change of guard, nothing much has changed. “We still have to go to ponds to collect water and, in the hot, dry season, the water becomes so thick with mud that it’s virtually unusable.”

Rekha feels she has been “betrayed twice”.

“We voted for the communists but they did nothing for us. Then we voted for Trinamul but, so far, we have not seen much (of a change).”

The scene is no different in other villages in the area like Dhangikusum, Simulpal, Shakhabhanga and Jamaimari.

“There are no roads leading to Dhangikusum,” said Gurupada Sabal, a villager. “The panchayat elections are here but we still don’t know who to vote for.”

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130710/jsp/frontpage/story_17100892.jsp#.Udy8LDswevc

Who will defend the earth? -- Noam Chomsky

$
0
0
How Do We Defend Ourselves from the Corporate and Imperial Forces That Threaten Our Existence?
By Noam Chomsky
July 08, 2013- With wrenching tragedies only a few miles away, and still worse catastrophes perhaps not far removed, it may seem wrong, perhaps even cruel, to shift attention to other prospects that, although abstract and uncertain, might offer a path to a better world - and not in the remote future. 
I’ve visited Lebanon several times and witnessed moments of great hope, and of despair, that were tinged with the Lebanese people’s remarkable determination to overcome and to move forward. 

The first time I visited - if that’s the right word - was exactly 60 years ago, almost to the day. My wife and I were hiking in Israel’s northern Galilee one evening, when a jeep drove by on a road near us and someone called out that we should turn back: We were in the wrong country. We had inadvertently crossed the border, then unmarked - now, I suppose, bristling with armaments. 

A minor event, but it forcefully brought home a lesson: The legitimacy of borders - of states, for that matter - is at best conditional and temporary. 

Almost all borders have been imposed and maintained by violence, and are quite arbitrary. The Lebanon-Israel border was established a century ago by the Sykes-Picot Agreement, dividing up the former Ottoman Empire in the interests of British and French imperial power, with no concern for the people who happened to live there, or even for the terrain. The border makes no sense, which is why it was so easy to cross unwittingly. 

Surveying the terrible conflicts in the world, it’s clear that almost all are the residue of imperial crimes and the borders that the great powers drew in their own interests. 
Pashtuns, for example, have never accepted the legitimacy of the Durand Line, drawn by Britain to separate Pakistan from Afghanistan; nor has any Afghan government ever accepted it. It is in the interests of today’s imperial powers that Pashtuns crossing the Durand Line are labeled “terrorists” so that their homes may be subjected to murderous attack by U.S. drones and special operations forces. 

Few borders in the world are so heavily guarded by sophisticated technology, and so subject to impassioned rhetoric, as the one that separates Mexico from the United States, two countries with amicable diplomatic relations. 

That border was established by U.S. aggression during the 19th century. But it was kept fairly open until 1994, when President Bill Clinton initiated Operation Gatekeeper, militarizing it. 

Before then, people had regularly crossed it to see relatives and friends. It’s likely that Operation Gatekeeper was motivated by another event that year: the imposition of the North American Free Trade Agreement, which is a misnomer because of the words “free trade.” 

Doubtless the Clinton administration understood that Mexican farmers, however efficient they might be, couldn’t compete with highly subsidized U.S. agribusiness, and that Mexican businesses couldn’t compete with U.S. multinationals, which under NAFTA rules must receive special privileges like “national treatment” in Mexico. Such measures would almost inevitably lead to a flood of immigrants across the border. 
Some borders are eroding along with the cruel hatreds and conflicts they symbolize and inspire. The most dramatic case is Europe. For centuries, Europe was the most savage region in the world, torn by hideous and destructive wars. Europe developed the technology and the culture of war that enabled it to conquer the world. After a final burst of indescribable savagery, the mutual destruction ceased at the end of World War II. 

Scholars attribute that outcome to the thesis of democratic peace - that one democracy hesitates to war against another. But Europeans may also have understood that they had developed such capacities for destruction that the next time they played their favorite game, it would be the last. 

The closer integration that has developed since then is not without serious problems, but it is a vast improvement over what came before. 

A similar outcome would hardly be unprecedented for the Middle East, which until recently was essentially borderless. And the borders are eroding, though in awful ways. 
Syria’s seemingly inexorable plunge to suicide is tearing the country apart. Veteran Middle East correspondent Patrick Cockburn, now working for The Independent, predicts that the conflagration and its regional impact may lead to the end of the Sykes-Picot regime. 

The Syrian civil war has reignited the Sunni-Shiite conflict that was one of the most terrible consequences of the U.S.-U.K. invasion of Iraq 10 years ago. 

The Kurdish regions of Iraq and now Syria are moving toward autonomy and linkages. Many analysts now predict that a Kurdish state may be established before a Palestinian state is. 

If Palestine ever gains independence in something like the terms of the overwhelming international consensus, its borders with Israel will likely erode through normal commercial and cultural interchange, as has happened in the past during periods of relative calm. 

That development could be a step toward closer regional integration, and perhaps the slow disappearance of the artificial border dividing the Galilee between Israel and Lebanon, so that hikers and others could pass freely where my wife and I crossed 60 years ago. 

Such a development seems to me to offer the only realistic hope for some resolution of the plight of Palestinian refugees, now only one of the refugee disasters tormenting the region since the invasion of Iraq and Syria’s descent into hell. 

The blurring of borders and these challenges to the legitimacy of states bring to the fore serious questions about who owns the Earth. Who owns the global atmosphere being polluted by the heat-trapping gases that have just passed an especially perilous threshold, as we learned in May? 

Or to adopt the phrase used by indigenous people throughout much of the world, Who will defend the Earth? Who will uphold the rights of nature? Who will adopt the role of steward of the commons, our collective possession? 

That the Earth now desperately needs defense from impending environmental catastrophe is surely obvious to any rational and literate person. The different reactions to the crisis are a most remarkable feature of current history. 

At the forefront of the defense of nature are those often called “primitive”: members of indigenous and tribal groups, like the First Nations in Canada or the Aborigines in Australia - the remnants of peoples who have survived the imperial onslaught. At the forefront of the assault on nature are those who call themselves the most advanced and civilized: the richest and most powerful nations. 

The struggle to defend the commons takes many forms. In microcosm, it is taking place right now in Turkey’s Taksim Square, where brave men and women are protecting one of the last remnants of the commons of Istanbul from the wrecking ball of commercialization and gentrification and autocratic rule that is destroying this ancient treasure. 
The defenders of Taksim Square are at the forefront of a worldwide struggle to preserve the global commons from the ravages of that same wrecking ball - a struggle in which we must all take part, with dedication and resolve, if there is to be any hope for decent human survival in a world that has no borders. It is our common possession, to defend or to destroy. 

Economic consequences of SoniaG politics -- Arvind Subramanian. Workers will exit from the state. They will stop producing.

$
0
0

The economic consequences of Professor Amartya Sen

Redistributive policies via rights and entitlements are ultimately self-defeating

This United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government is heading into the tenth and possibly last year of office, a tenure whose crowning achievement might well be the . One may fault this government for incompetence, corruption, and delayed action but it cannot be faulted for lacking a vision. There has been an overarching idea that underlies many of its economic policies: namely, that the poor and underprivileged in society must be empowered by conferring them with new rights - to work, education, food, and presumably, all basic needs.

Call this the redistribution through rights and entitlements (RRE) approach, which is now associated with the articulate advocacy of Professor , channelled effectively into policy through his co-author and long-time collaborator Professor Jean Dreze. Their latest book is a cogent exposition of the . Nobody can question the moral urgency of helping the poor which is the key objective underlying this approach. But that should not exempt its methods and consequences from critical scrutiny. And this scrutiny reveals some serious failings.

1. RRE causes instability and vulnerability: Amongst emerging markets, India is the most macroeconomically vulnerable, with a deadly combination of high fiscal deficits, close to double-digit inflation, and high external deficits financed by short-term foreign capital inflows that may even now be starting to flow out of the country. How did we get here, though? Much of the blame must lie with the redistributional zeal of this government. The ultimate cause of macro-vulnerability is the high fiscal deficits in turn caused by the fact that government spending per capita (intrinsic to RRE) has increased by nearly 75 per cent by under this government (see Figure 1).

This spending contributed to instability directly, because it pushed up rural wages and procurement prices, thereby stoking inflation; and indirectly, because it put aggregate demand on steroids, even as supply capacity was left to languish, weak and under-nourished.
For some time, the macro-economic damage caused by RRE remained obscured. Headline fiscal deficit numbers actually declined during UPA-I, because its tenure witnessed a dream combination of high growth and low interest rates which should have resulted in headline deficit numbers substantially below actual ones. Similarly, headline fiscal debt numbers have declined throughout the UPA's tenure, but for bad reasons - India has reduced its debt through sustainedly high inflation. The government may have gained by this, but the aam aadmi has suffered, since his capacity to hedge against inflation is limited. And now, the underlying damage to the overall economy has been exposed now that international investors have become less willing to finance India, as reflected in the plight of the rupee.

2. RRE legitimises atrocious policies: If one were asked to single out the worst economic policy in India, energy subsidies - for diesel, kerosene and above all power - must be a strong contender. Consider the bad outcomes that power subsidies cause or abet: bad crop mix, depleted water resources, unprofitable and mismanaged state electricity boards, under-investment in power, lower economic growth and higher carbon emissions.

Now, politicians promising subsidised power for electoral reasons is understandable. That is part of the hurly-burly of grubby politics. But intellectuals providing legitimacy to these policies is another matter. Intellectuals on the Left cannot expect to be exonerated on the grounds that they have not explicitly advocated subsidised power. After all, if there is a right to cheap food and education why isn't there one also to basic energy needs and hence to subsidised power for the poor? And this is not a slippery slope argument - because India has slipped already, finding itself at the slope's bottom which is the shambolic mess that is the power sector in India.

3. RRE undervalues opportunity costs: Governments have limited political capital and must hence prioritise actions, choosing those that maximise bang for the buck. In this view, RRE is problematic because it leads to sub-optimal policy choices. So, instead of enacting a right to education act, why not focus on getting teachers to show up for work, that would have a far greater impact on educational outcomes? Similarly, instead of an employment guarantee scheme, why not create sustainable opportunities for employment creation by eliminating regulatory impediments?

The government could defend its choices by invoking political constraints: absentee teachers in rural India cannot be fired because they are also party apparatchiks, and labour laws cannot be amended because of vested interests. But the problem with votaries of the RRE approach is they don't apply the same analysis to their preferred policies. Will RRE not run into the same political and bureaucratic constraints?

4. RRE overburdens state capacity: Indeed, one of the supreme ironies of the Left in India is that it has been so disrespectful to its core belief in a strong state. Several commentators have noted the problems of creating rights without the ability of the state to honour those rights. The public distribution system is broken but instead of being fixed or replaced, it is being asked to do more. It is as if an emaciated, old man struggling to carry a load of stones is asked to carry another load because that will strengthen his muscles.

What is worse is that the Left has been ambivalent about or even hostile to the one genuinely important and far-reaching attempt at building state capacity in India: the Aadhaar scheme (yes, it is really hard to think of any other state capacity-building initiative). Regardless of the merits of direct cash transfers (which is only one potential application of the biometric identification project), the important point is that Aadhaar seeks to harness technology to strengthen the ability of the state (and also the private sector) to deliver services in the long run. The Left in particular should be celebrating rather than griping about it.

5. RRE undermines the state: Intellectually, the most damaging consequence of RRE in India, and least recognised, is that it does not just burden the state, it has the potential to fatally undermine it. How so? The evolution of the state provides one important lesson pointed out recently by Professor Indira Rajaraman of the National Institue of Public Finance and Policy. The history of Europe and the US suggests that typically, states provide essential services (physical security, health, education, infrastructure, etc.) first before they take on their redistribution role. That sequencing is not accidental. Unless the middle class in society perceives that it derives some benefits from the state, it will be unwilling to finance redistribution. In other words, the legitimacy to redistribute is earned through a demonstrated record of effectiveness in delivering essential services.

A corollary is that if the state's role is predominantly redistribution, the middle class will seek - in Professor Albert Hirschman's famous terminology - to exit from the state. They will avoid or minimise paying taxes; they will cocoon themselves in gated communities; they will use diesel to obtain power; and they will send their children overseas for higher education. All these pathologies are in evidence in India. By reducing the pressure on the state, middle class exit will shrivel it, eroding its legitimacy further, leading to more exit and so on. A state that prioritises or over-emphasises RRE, risks unleashing this vicious spiral.

For this admirer of Professor Sen's exceptional academic work two ironies stand out. His Nobel-winning insight was about the importance of broad purchasing power rather than the narrow (physical) availability of food in avoiding famines and mass starvation. It is curious, even mystifying, therefore, to see him forcefully advocate, through morbidity-laden polemic, the physical provision of one type of food - cereals, which are rapidly declining in people's consumption basket - to help reduce malnutrition.

His second major insight was that development was about freedom, especially the freedom to exercise choice. Yet, the RRE approach has privileged paternalism - by determining that the poor need specific assistance - over expanded choice in the form of "untied" cash transfers or broader employment opportunities that enhance purchasing power.

If there is a tension, even contradiction, between Sen, the academic and Sen, the advocate, this government might, in the twilight of its tenure, do well to ask itself: did we draw our inspiration from, and put faith in, the wrong Sen?



The writer is a Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics and Center for Global Development

MPs, MLAs to be disqualified on date of criminal conviction: Supreme Court

$
0
0
A file photo of the Supreme Court of India.
Published: July 10, 2013 16:04 IST | Updated: July 11, 2013 01:20 IST

MPs, MLAs to be disqualified on date of criminal conviction

J. Venkatesan

Supreme Court strikes down law that allowed time for appeal

The Supreme Court on Wednesday held that chargesheeted Members of Parliament and MLAs, on conviction for offences, will be immediately disqualified from holding membership of the House without being given three months’ time for appeal, as was the case before.
A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and S.J. Mukhopadhaya struck down as unconstitutional Section 8 (4) of the Representation of the People Act that allows convicted lawmakers a three-month period for filing appeal to the higher court and to get a stay of the conviction and sentence. The Bench, however, made it clear that the ruling will be prospective and those who had already filed appeals in various High Courts or the Supreme Court against their convictions would be exempt from it.
Section 8 of the RP Act deals with disqualification on conviction for certain offences: A person convicted of any offence and sentenced to imprisonment for varying terms under Sections 8 (1) (2) and (3) shall be disqualified from the date of conviction and shall continue to be disqualified for a further period of six years since his release. But Section 8 (4) of the RP Act gives protection to MPs and MLAs as they can continue in office even after conviction if an appeal is filed within three months.
The Bench found it unconstitutional that convicted persons could be disqualified from contesting elections but could continue to be Members of Parliament and State Legislatures once elected.
Allowing two writ petitions filed by advocate Lily Thomas and Lok Prahari, through its General Secretary S. N. Shukla, the Bench said: “A reading of the two provisions in Articles 102(1) (e) and 191(1) (e) of the Constitution would make it abundantly clear that Parliament is to make one law for a person to be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a Member of either House of Parliament or Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of the State. Parliament thus does not have the power under Articles 102(1)(e) and 191(1)(e) of the Constitution to make different laws for a person to be disqualified for being chosen as a member and for a person to be disqualified for continuing as a member of Parliament or the State Legislature.”
Writing the judgment, Justice Patnaik said: “ The language of Articles 102(1) (e) and 191(1) (e) of the Constitution is such that the disqualification for both a person to be chosen as a member of a House of Parliament or the State Legislature and for a person to continue as a member of Parliament or the State Legislature has to be the same.”
The Bench said: “Section 8 (4) of the Act which carves out a saving in the case of sitting members of Parliament or State Legislature from the disqualifications under sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) of Section 8 of the Act or which defers the date on which the disqualification will take effect in the case of a sitting member of Parliament or a State Legislature is beyond the powers conferred on Parliament by the Constitution.”
The Bench held: “Looking at the affirmative terms of Articles 102(1) (e) and 191(1) (e) of the Constitution, we hold that Parliament has been vested with the powers to make law laying down the same disqualifications for person to be chosen as a member of Parliament or a State Legislature and for a sitting member of a House of Parliament or a House of a State Legislature. We also hold that the provisions of Article 101(3) (a) and 190(3) (a) of the Constitution expressly prohibit Parliament to defer the date from which the disqualification will come into effect in case of a sitting member of Parliament or a State Legislature. Parliament, therefore, has exceeded its powers conferred by the Constitution in enacting sub-section (4) of Section 8 of the Act and accordingly sub-section (4) of Section 8 of the Act is ultra vires the Constitution.”
The Bench said: “Under Section 8 (1) (2) and (3) of the Act, the disqualification takes effect from the date of conviction. Thus, there may be several sitting members of Parliament and State Legislatures who have already incurred disqualification by virtue of a conviction covered under Section 8 (1) (2) or (3) of the Act. Sitting members of Parliament and State Legislature who have already been convicted of any of the offences mentioned in sub-section (1), (2) and (3) of Section 8 of the Act and who have filed appeals or revisions which are pending and are accordingly saved from the disqualifications by virtue of sub-section (4) of Section 8 of the Act should not, in our considered opinion, be affected by the declaration now made by us in this judgment. This is because the knowledge that sitting members of Parliament or State Legislatures will no longer be protected by sub-section (4) of Section 8 of the Act will be acquired by all concerned only on the date this judgment is pronounced by this Court.”
However, the Bench said: “If any sitting member of Parliament or a State Legislature is convicted of any of the offences mentioned in sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) of Section 8 of the Act and by virtue of such conviction and/or sentence suffers the disqualifications mentioned in sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) of Section 8 of the Act after the pronouncement of this judgment, his membership of Parliament or the State Legislature, as the case may be, will not be saved by subsection (4) of Section 8 of the Act which we have by this judgment declared as ultra vires the Constitution notwithstanding that he files the appeal or revision against the conviction and /or sentence.”

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/mps-mlas-to-be-disqualified-on-date-of-criminal-conviction/article4901596.ece?homepage=true

Aircel-Maxis ghotala: SC turns up heat. Subramanian Swamy's pleas to be heard next.

$
0
0

SC TURNS UP HEAT ON CBI IN AIRCEL-MAXIS CASE

Thursday, 11 July 2013 | PNS | New Delhi

Expressing displeasure over the delay in filing the charge sheet in the Aircel-Maxis case despite the lapse of more than a year after filing the FIR, the Supreme Court on Wednesday set a specific timeline for the probe.
The apex court ordered the CBI to seek prosecution sanction from the Government against officials involved in the case registered against former Telecom Minister Dayanidhi Maran. The Bench headed by Justice GS Singhvi and KS Radhakrishnan also ordered that the Government should take a decision on the CBI’s application in two weeks and report back to the court by August 1. “This matter must be brought to an end to a logical conclusion,” the Bench said while posting the case for hearing on August 1.
Sources said the CBI is seeking sanction for prosecution of two telecom officials during Maran’s period. CBI admitted that their LoRs to Malaysia seeking access to and details about the Maxis owners T Ananda Krishnan and Ralph Marshall, the accused in the case, did not yield results.
Maran has been accused of forcing Chennai-based telecom promoter C Sivasankaran to sell the stake in Aircel in 2006 to a Malaysian firm Maxis Group owned by the Kuala Lumpur-based business tycoon Krishnan. Maran was the Telecom Minister between February 2004 and May, 2007.
The petitioner, Subramanian Swamy, argued for cancellation of Aircel if the Malaysian authorities were not co-operating even as he sought to cite the FIPB violations in the deal involving Finance Minister P Chidambaram. The judges said the FIPB violations part as well as non-cooperation would be presented in the next hearing of the case, after assessing the progress of CBI probe.
The Bench observed the inordinate delay in the filing of the charge sheet, in which FIR was registered on October 2011. CBI counsel KK Venugopal said they have finished probe on the Indian side but Malaysian responses were not yet received. The Bench then observed that CBI should take a call on the probe and file a charge sheet with the evidences collected. Additional charge sheets may be filed later, it said.
Swamy accused CBI of limiting the probe only on the arm-twisting aspect of Aircel promoter C Sivasankaran by Maran and ignoring the FIPB violations in approving the deal. CBI has not yet probed into Maxis acquiring 100 percent stake in Aircel, whereas only 74 per cent foreign investment is permitted in India, he said.
 http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/sc-turns-up-heat-on-cbi-in-aircel-maxis-case.html

Hazor Sphinx discovered with Inscription -- Mycerinus (Photos)

$
0
0

TUESDAY, JULY 9, 2013


Hazor Sphinx Inscription Photos

Because I can find no networked version of this press release I am taking the liberty of posting it in its entirety here:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Jerusalem, July 9, 2013 — At a site in Tel Hazor National Park, north of the Sea of Galilee, archeologists from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem have unearthed part of a unique Sphinx belonging to one of the ancient pyramid-building pharaohs.


Two views of a Sphinx statue fragment found by Hebrew University of Jerusalem archaeologists at the Tel Hazor excavations north of the Sea of Galilee in Israel. An inscription ties the Sphinx to Mycerinus, an Egyptian king and pyramid  builder, circa 2500 BCE. This is the only known statue bearing this pharaoh's name. (Photo courtesy archaeologists Prof. Amnon Ben-Tor and Dr. Sharon Zuckerman)



The Hazor Excavations are headed by Prof. Amnon Ben-Tor, the Yigael Yadin Professor in the Archaeology of Eretz Israel at the Hebrew University’s Institute of Archaeology, and Dr. Sharon Zuckerman, a lecturer at the Hebrew University’s Institute of Archaeology.


Prof. Amnon Ben-Tor and Dr. Sharon Zuckerman of the Hebrew University’s Institute of Archaeology, who are leading the Hazor Excavations (Photo courtesy archaeologists Prof. Amnon Ben-Tor and Dr. Sharon Zuckerman)

Reporters can reach the archaeologists for comment at 054-5928111 (Dr. Zuckerman) or 054-4643180 (Prof. Ben-Tor). Please note that Israel time is currently UTC/GMT +3 hours (7 hours ahead of New York). For international calls to Israel, replace the first 0 with +972-.

As the only known Sphinx of the king Mycerinus discovered anywhere in the world — including in Egypt — the find at Hazor is an unexpected and important discovery. Moreover, it is only piece of a royal Sphinx sculpture discovered in the entire Levant area (the eastern part of the Mediterranean).

Along with the king’s name, the hieroglyphic inscription includes the descriptor “Beloved by the divine manifestation… that gave him eternal life.” According to Prof. Ben-Tor and Dr. Zuckerman, this text indicates that the Sphinx probably originated in the ancient city of Heliopolis (the city of 'On' in the Bible), north of modern Cairo.

or more information:  


Dov Smith
Hebrew University Foreign Press Liaison
02-5882844 / 054-8820860 (+972-54-8820860)
http://ancientworldbloggers.blogspot.in/2013/07/hazor-sphinx-inscription-photos.html 


Part of Egyptian Sphinx found in Northern Dig

Artifact bears the name of Mycerinus, the king who was one of the builders of the Giza pyramids.

 Arutz Sheva

First Publish: 7/9/2013, 2:41 PM

Sphinx's feet
Sphinx's feet
Prof. Amnon Ben-Tor and Dr. Sharon Zuckerman
As modern Egypt searches for a new leader, Israeli archaeologists have found evidence of an ancient Egyptian leader in northern Israel.
At a site in Tel Hazor National Park, north of the Sea of Galilee, archeologists from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem have unearthed part of a unique Sphinx belonging to one of the ancient pyramid-building pharaohs.

The Hazor Excavations are headed by Prof. Amnon Ben-Tor, the Yigael Yadin Professor in the Archaeology of Eretz Israel at the Hebrew University’s Institute of Archaeology, and Dr. Sharon Zuckerman, a lecturer at the Hebrew University’s Institute of Archaeology.

Working with a team from the Institute of Archaeology, they discovered part of a Sphinx brought over from Egypt, with a hieroglyphic inscription between its front legs. The inscription bears the name of the Egyptian king Mycerinus, who ruled in the third millennium BCE, more than 4,000 years ago. The king was one of the builders of the famous Giza pyramids.

As the only known Sphinx of this king discovered anywhere in the world — including in Egypt — the find at Hazor is an unexpected and important discovery. Moreover, it is only piece of a royal Sphinx sculpture discovered in the entire Levant area (the eastern part of the Mediterranean).

Along with the king’s name, the hieroglyphic inscription includes the descriptor “Beloved by the divine manifestation… that gave him eternal life.” According to Prof. Ben-Tor and Dr. Zuckerman, this text indicates that the Sphinx probably originated in the ancient city of Heliopolis (the city of 'On' in the Bible), north of modern Cairo.

The Sphinx was discovered in the destruction layer of Hazor that was destroyed during the 13th century BCE, at the entrance to the city palace. According to the archaeologists, it is highly unlikely that the Sphinx was brought to Hazor during the time of Mycerinus, since there is no record of any relationship between Egypt and Israel in the third millennium BCE.

More likely, the statue was brought to Israel in the second millennium BCE during the dynasty of the kings known as the Hyksos, who originated in Canaan. It could also have arrived during the 15th to 13th centuries BCE, when Canaan was under Egyptian rule, as a gift from an Egyptian king to the king of Hazor, which was the most important city in the southern Levant at the time.

Hazor is the largest biblical-era site in Israel, covering some 200 acres, and has been recognized as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO. The population of Hazor in the second millennium BCE is estimated to have been about 20,000, making it the largest and most important city in the entire region. Its size and strategic location on the route connecting Egypt and Babylon made it "the head of all those kingdoms" according to the biblical book of Joshua (Joshua 11:10).

Hazor's conquest by the Israelites opened the way to the conquest and settlement of the Israelites in Canaan. The city was rebuilt and fortified by King Solomon and prospered in the days of Ahab and Jeroboam II, until its final destruction by the Assyrians in 732 BCE.

Documents discovered at Hazor and at sites in Egypt and Iraq attest that Hazor maintained cultural and trade relations with both Egypt and Babylon. Artistic artifacts, including those imported to Hazor from near and far, have been unearthed at the site. Hazor is currently one of Israel's national parks.

The Hebrew University began the Hazor excavation in the mid-1950s and continued them in the late 1960s. Excavations at the site were resumed in 1990 by Prof. Amnon Ben-Tor, who was joined in 2006 by Dr. Sharon Zuckerman, as part of the Selz Foundation Hazor Excavations in Memory of Yigael Yadin. The present excavation area is managed by Shlomit Becher, a doctoral student of the Hebrew University’s Institute of Archaeology, and is sponsored by the Israel Exploration Society (IES) in cooperation with the Israel Antiquities Authority and the Israel Nature and Parks Authority.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/169753#.Ud4x-zswevc

Archeologists unearth mighty Egyptian Sphinx dating 4,000 years in Israel

Researchers believe the large granite paws of the mythical beast belonged to the Pharaoh Mycerinus of the third millennium B.C. How they ended up at the Tel Hazor excavation site is a mystery.

Comments (4)

MENAHEM KAHANA/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Australian excavation volunteer Joshua Talbot displays the remains of an Egyptian Sphinx believed to have belonged to Pharoh Mycerinus who ruled more than 4,000 years ago.

As modern-day Egypt breaks ground in its second revolution in just several years, pieces of one of the country's former rulers dating more than 4,000 years have resurfaced.
An ancient Sphinx believed to have belonged to Egyptian Pharaoh Mycerinus in the third millennium B.C. has been discovered by archaeologists in Israel of all places.
The stunning relic, seen with Mycerinus' name inscribed between the two paws, was recently discovered in northern Israel but researchers aren't entirely sure how it got there so many years ago.

COURTESY PROF. AMNON BEN-TOR AND DR. SHARON ZUCKERMAN

The stunning relic, seen with Mycerinus' name inscribed between the two paws, was recently discovered in northern Israel but researchers aren't entirely sure how it got there so many years ago.

Excavations at Tel Hazor, in northern Israel, have uncovered a pair of large granite paws and pieces of the mythical creature's forearms, archeologists at Hebrew University in Jerusalem announced Tuesday.
One theory is that the Sphinx was plundered by the Canaanites before making its way to the modern-day excavation site.

COURTESY PROF. AMNON BEN-TOR AND

One theory is that the Sphinx was plundered by the Canaanites before making its way to the modern-day excavation site.

The name of Mycerinus, a pharaoh responsible for building one of the Giza pyramids in 2,500 B.C., is seen chiseled in hieroglyphics down the heavy 40-pound stone. It's said to be the first relic found bearing his name.
The inscription describes him as "beloved by the divine manifestation … that gave him eternal life," according to Hebrew Professor Amnon Ben-Tor who used that text to speculate that the Sphinx originated from the ancient city of Heliopolis, north of modern Cairo.
Another theory is that the statue was gifted by the King of Hazor in the 15 to 13 centuries B.C.before found at the excavation site of Tel Hazor, north of Tel Aviv.

MENAHEM KAHANA/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Another theory is that the statue was gifted by the King of Hazor in the 15 to 13 centuries B.C.before found at the excavation site of Tel Hazor, north of Tel Aviv.

Archaeologists estimate the entire statue was 5 feet tall, 1.5-feet long and weighed about 500 pounds.
Prof. Amnon Ben-Tor and Dr. Sharon Zuckerman of the Hebrew University’s Institute of Archaeology are  leading the Tel-Hazor dig.

COURTESY PROF. AMNON BEN-TOR AND DR. SHARON ZUCKERMAN

Prof. Amnon Ben-Tor and Dr. Sharon Zuckerman of the Hebrew University’s Institute of Archaeology are leading the Tel-Hazor dig.

But what they don't know is how it got to where it was found.
With no known relationship between Egypt and that area of Israel during Mycerinus' rule, researchers do not believe the Sphinx left Egypt until much later. But the team of archaeologists, led by Professor Ben-Tor and Dr. Sharon Zuckerman, has already picked out a few theories.
Talbot displays the remains of the Sphinx with a hieroglyphic inscription between its paws dating circa the third century B.C.

MENAHEM KAHANA/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Talbot displays the remains of the Sphinx with a hieroglyphic inscription between its paws dating circa the third century B.C.

One is that the statue was gifted by the King of Hazor in the 15 to 13 centuries B.C. Hazor would become the largest and most important city in the region in the second millennium B.C. Resting between Egypt and Babylon, it was referred to in the Bible as "the head of those kingdoms."
The ancient city of Hazor was destroyed in the 13th century B.C., with its remains buried beneath.

MENAHEM KAHANA/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

The ancient city of Hazor was destroyed in the 13th century B.C., with its remains buried beneath.

Another theory is that it was plundered by the Canaanites who ruled lower Egypt in the late 17th and early 16th century B.C. It’s speculated the statue then made its way to the city of Hazor — today’s excavation site — which was brutally destroyed in the 13th century B.C.
Because of the pillage, Ben-Tor described the statue's discovery, even though not fully intact, as particularly remarkable with so much of the city annihilated during its foreign occupation.
Speaking to the Haaretz newspaper he compared the monument as being no different to the statue of Saddam Hussein being toppled after his fall in Iraq.
Like today, all symbols of the former regime had to go.
ngolgowski@nydailynews.com

Bronze Age linguistic doctrine

$
0
0
Bronze Age Linguistic Doctrine

Executive summary

How did the Meluhh (Mleccha) language, Munda, Dravidian and Indo-Aryan language families constitute themselves into an Indian sprachbund? Bronze Age imperative!

Bronze Age intensified the prospecting for key alloying minerals to create metal tools, pots and pans. This led to movements of lapidaries, miners and metalsmiths to move, in search of mineral resources, to places far-off from their homes.

The new revolutionary products created from precious stones, minerals of tin and zinc alloyed with copper to create bronze and brass ingots, metal tools, sharp and heavy, non-brittle metal weapons, metal pots and metal pans, by lapidaries, miners and metalsmiths resulted in a demand for the stoneware and metalware across a wide area extending from Rakhigarhi (Delhi, India) to Haifa (Israel).  This demand necessitated long-distance trade by sea-faring artisans and merchants. This trade also necessitated the invention of writing systems to document the nature of products traded and identify the parties involved in the trade contracts. One such writing system was Indus Writing which provided rebuses using Meluhha (Mleccha) words to describe and incise (takṣat vāk, incised speech) words as Indus inscription texts and pictorial motifs which are verily stoneware and metalware catalogs. These catalogs were complemented by cuneiform texts to specify contracting parties and contract terms for the trade.

Thus, the Bronze Age imperative led to increased exchange of technical terms, particularly those related to metalwork, which were absorbed into various languages of the contact areas involved with the production and trade of stoneware and metalware. This Bronze Age absorption of technical terms is comparable to the terms generated by the communications revolution of recent decades involving computers and cell-phones which have been incorporated into lexicons of languages all over the globe.

The Meluhha prospectors, artisans and traders established settlements in Sumer and Mesopotamia and had trade agents along the Persian Gulf in Dilmun and Magan, as evidenced by cuneiform texts and seals/tablets with incised Indus writing, categorized as Dilmun or Failaka or Persian Gulf seals.

The Bronze Age imperative which impacted languages is briefly delineated by the phrase, Bronze Age Linguistic Doctrine. An outline of this doctrine need not be detained by polemics of Aryan Invasion or Migration Theories or Out of India Theories since direction of borrowings is not required to be specified to delineate the Indian sprachbund, a linguistic area which included many cognate semantic clusters with terms necessitated by the inventions of the Bronze Age.

Nature of doctrine
A doctrine is postulated as an informative proposition or truth claim of objective reality. A doctrine gains the attributes of an authoritative dogma. Doctrines are common in theological domain but it is surprising to find a doctrine in the domain of language studies.

One such doctrine postulated by linguists to explain cognate glosses among Indo-European languages was the Aryan Invasion Theory (with variants such as Aryan Migration or Trickle-in Theories). This doctrine sought to explain many glosses in a category called Indo-Aryan languages. The doctrine was, simply that Aryan-speakers invaded India and forced their Indo-European language on the natives’ and forced modifications in the natives’ tongue or speech, creating Indo-Aryan.  Counter-arguments have been advanced that an Out of India Theory is also consistent with the evidence of glosses in Indo-Aryan languages cognate with Indo-European and polemical views point to many areas as possible urheimat, original homeland of IE speakers.

Bronze Age Linguistic Doctrine as alternative for Aryan Invasion Linguistic Doctrine
An alternative to the Aryan Invasion Linguistic Doctrine is proposed to explain the essential  semantic unity of many ancient  Indian languages of the Bronze Age.  Many cognate metallurgical terms invented during the Bronze Age were adopted within the speech area — cutting across Munda, Dravidian and Indo-Aryan language families. Bronze Age Linguistic Doctrine explains the raison d’etre for the formation of Indian sprachbund, a language union because tin-bronzes resulted in a revolution in ways of living of the people living and identified with the sprachbund. Earlier arsenical bronzes from the Anatolian peninsula of Turkey produced brittle weapons that shattered on impact. Widespread and large-scale use of bronze for tools such as ploughshare, hammer, sickle changed the nature and scale of daily activities and use of bronze for sharp swords, spear or arrow tips and other weapons changed the nature of warfare and areal contacts and relationships. With bronze and later iron tools, stone cutting, dressing, and sculpting were possible. The revolutionary nature of cultural change brought about by the use of bronze is comparable to the revolution witnessed in the use of modern computers and mobile phones or in the wake of industrial revolution, the use of railway trains for long-distance or commuter travel. Such technological inventions profoundly alter the speech forms in vogue all over the world with the common use of lexical terms such as train, ticket, cell-phone, call – in almost all languages of the globe.

The ruling IE linguistic doctrine is now on its last legs of decay:  the fate of doctrines is that If once true, is always true and if once false, is always false.

The situation calls for a new doctrine to replace the terms of the decayed linguistic doctrine of Aryan Invasion because mere trickle-in by tourists cannot explain displacement of entire sets of languages or speech of ‘natives’ and there is no archaeological evidence for any Aryan invasion.

Doctrinal reconciliation, without calling for capitulation, is possible by postulating a replacement doctrine which explains the realities in three dimensions to reconstruct the living of life over millennia: anthropology/archaeology, culture (value systems) and language.

George A. Lindbeck presents the nature of doctrine in his book, The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1984). The presentation occurs in the context of his effort to seek unity in the church, reconciling varying church doctrines. Lindbeck notes that religion refers to "a kind of cultural and/or linguistic framework or medium that shapes the entirety of life and thought ... it is similar to an idiom that makes possible the description of realities, the formulation of beliefs, and the experiencing of inner attitudes, feelings, and sentiments.”[Lindbeck, The Nature of Doctrine, 33]Lindbeck mentions that Wittgenstein conceives of private languages as “logically impossible.”[Lindbeck, The Nature of Doctrine, 38] However, on a closer reading, one finds that ‘logical impossibility’ is not a category in which Wittgenstein is working as much as the category of ‘sense’ [Sinn] and ‘non-sense’ [Unsinn].[ E.g. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, §245, §247, §252-3, §257, §278, §282.]  For Wittgenstein’s discussions on private language, see Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005), §243-315. 


Even in physics or chemistry, a theory alters the facts to be observed and use of observation terms. This is demonstrated by shifts from Aristotlean to Newtonian to Einsteinian physics and from Darwinian biology to Genetic chemistry. Similarly, in the IE linguistic doctrine of Aryan Invasion Theory, the term ‘invasion’ was modified by using terms such as ‘migration’ or ‘trickle-in’ to explain the reality of features of Indo-Aryan languages which were found to be in common with other Indo-European languages. This theory soon ran into rough weather by questions raised by archaeological realities and by the presence of a large number of agricultural terms in many Indo-Aryan languages which had no cognates in other Indo-European languages. This led to the amendment of the doctrine of Aryan Invasion Theory to posit an Indian sprachbund, a linguistic area where different language families absorbed core language features from one another to create a linguistic union called the sprachbund. This doctrinal capitulation is merely an attempt to still retain the framework of a linguistic theory positing an essential unity of Indo-European (IE) languages including the Indo-Aryan languages. This capitulation runs into further rough weather when linguists began to see the presence of Munda words in Sanskrit and affinities between Munda and Dravidian languages.

An event more profound than the Aryan invasion or trickle-in was the advent of the Bronze Age which had a decisive impact on the realities of material life, culture and language. The Bronze Age created an adventure of ideas and experiments in metallurgy in relating man to the material world which travelled far and wide without requiring large scale movements or migrations of people. The Bronze Age in reality solidified the Indian sprachbund. Hundreds of etyma of Munda, Dravidian and Indo-Aryan languages have provided cognates for the semantics of a particular metalware term, clearly pointing to the emergence of the sprachbund with the incorporation of such terms. Vidura conversing with Yudhishtira in Mleccha (Meluhha) language is attested in the Great Epic. The specific reference to the language and rebus readings of Indus writing hieroglyphs incorporate meluhha (mleccha) within the sprachbund. And, this incorporation occurred in the Bronze Age.

From an anthropological or archaeological perspective, the march of time is viewed in linear sequence with Stone Age, Bronze Age and Iron Age, a classification proposed by a Danish antiquarian, Christian Jürgensen Thomsen. A refinement of the period of transition to Bronze Age is a Neolithic Age.  Isaac Taylor in The Origin of the Aryans, 1889, mentions the Mesolithic as "a transition between the Palaeolithic and Neolithic Periods." Neolithic (New Stone) Age begins about 10,200 BCE in some parts of ancient Near East and ending between 4,500 to 2,000 BCE. This Age is commonly seen as related to the beginning of a revolution called farming. The Age ended when copper age or bronze age or iron age  tools became widespread. The Age is characterized by the cultural advances in domestication of animals.

In the context of documentation for languages, writing systems occur during the Bronze Age. Viable writing systems arose in Indus (hieroglyphs  mũh‘face’. mũhe ‘ingot’.), China (oracle bone script), Near East (cuneiform – related to Sumerian, Akkadian or Elamite or Hittite or Ugaritic), Egypt (hieroglyphs
Determinative hieroglyph for copper/bronze), and the Mediterranean (Linear B  
‘bronze’).   
Musée du Louvre. A complex token shaped like a bun-ingot denoted metal ingot, Susa, ca. 3300 BCE. Bronze inscriptions (金文, i.e. “text on metal”) preceded by a century the oracle bone script.

Proto-cuneiform metals list.  Composite text of “Archaic Metals”. Cf. Englund, Robert K. (1998). Texts from the Late Uruk Period. In Bauer, Josef; Englund, Robert K.; and Krebernik, Manfred (1998). Mesopotamien: Späturuk-Zeit und Frühdynastische Zeit. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 160/1; Annäherungen, 1. Freiburg, Switzerland: Academic Press Freiburg.

Bronze Age is characterized by the widespread use of copper and its alloy bronze.  In some parts of the globe, Iron Age intruded directly on the Neolithic, as in the evidence of iron smelting in Lohardiva, Malhar and Raja Nal ki Tila of Ganga basin, dated to ca 18th century BCE.

A revolution comparable to organized farming during the Neolithic occurred in the Bronze Age. The revolution was the result of the invention of alloying tin with copper to produce tin-bronze. One ton of tin when alloyed with copper could produce 11 tons of bronze. Tin bronzes replaced naturally occurring arsenical copper bronzes because tin was prospected and distributed in a widespread area of anient Near East – an area which extended from Rakhigarhi (near Delhi) to Haifa (Israel). In this area, either copper was smelted and alloyed with tin to produce tin-bronze, or alloyed bronze was directly obtained by trade from a nearby production area called Meluhha. This trade was destined for Sumer or Mesopotamia through the transit areas called Dilmun, Magan and Elam. Evidence exists for Meluhhan settlements to authenticate this trade. [Parpola, Asko; Parpola, Simo (1975). "On the relationship of the Sumerian Toponym Meluhha and Sanskrit Mleccha". Studia Orientalia 46: 205–238.]

Muhly notes: "A long-distance tin trade is not only feasible and possible, it was an absolute necessity. Sources of tin stone or cassiterite were few and far between, and a common source must have served many widely scattered matallurgical centers. This means that the tin would have been brought to a metallurgical center utilizing a nearby source of copper. That is, copper is likely to be a local product; the tin was almost always an import...The circumstances surrounding the discovery of these ingots are still rather confused, and our dating is based entirely upon the presence of engraves signs which seem to be in the Cypro-Minoan script, used on Cyprus and at Ugarit over the period 1500-1100 BCE. The ingots are made of a very pure tin, but what could they have to do with Cyprus? There is certainly no tin on Cyprus, so at best the ingots could have been transhipped from that island. How did they then find their way to Haifa? Are we dealing with a ship en route from Cyprus, perhaps to Egypt, which ran into trouble and sank off the coast of Haifa? If so, that certainly rules out Egypt as a source of tin. Ingots of tin are rare before Roman times and, in the eastern Mediterranean, unknown from any period. What the ingots do demonstrate is that metallic tin was in use during the Late Bronze Age...rather extensive use of metallic tin in the ancient eastern Mediterranean, which will probably come as a surprise to many people." (Muhly, James, New evidence for sources of and trade in bronze age tin, in: Alan D. Franklin, Jacqueline S. Olin, and Theodore A. Wertime, The Search for Ancient Tin, 1977, Seminar organized by Theodore A. Wertime and held at the Smithsonian Institution and the National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., March 14-15, 1977, p.47).

Shipwrecked cargo exhibit in National Maritime Museum (Hebrew: המוזיאון הימי הלאומי, HaMuze'on HaYami HaLe'umi), a maritime and Archaeological museum in Haifa, Israel. Uruluburn shipwreck dated to the late 14th century BCE or the late Bronze Age also resulted in the discovery of copper and tin ingots being traded.

Muhly, the archaeo-metallurgist scholar notes that Meluhha supplied tin to Mesopotamia.
There were Meluhhans in various Sumerian cities; there was also a Meluhhan town or district at one city. The Sumerian records indicate a large volume of trade; according to a Sumerian tablet, one shipment from Meluhha contained 5,900 kg of copper (13,000 lbs, or 6 ½ tons)!
These two hieroglyphs were also inscribed on two tin ingots discovered in the Haifa shipwreck. They are allographs. Both are read in Meluhha (Mleccha) of Indian sprachbund: ranku‘liquid measure’; ranku‘antelope’. Rebus: ranku‘tin’. An allograph to denote tin is: tagara ‘ram’ Rebus: tagara ‘tin’. Rebus: damgar ‘merchant’ (Akkadian)

“The Early Bronze Age of the 3rd millennium BCE saw the first development of a truly international age of metallurgy… The question is, of course, why all this took place in the 3rd millennium BCE… It seems to me that any attempt to explain why things suddenly took off about 3000 BCE has to explain the most important development, the birth of the art of writing… As for the concept of a Bronze Age one of the most significant events in the 3rdmillennium was the development of true tin-bronze alongside an arsenical alloy of copper…” (J.D. Muhly, 1973, Copper and Tin, Conn.: Archon., Hamden; Transactions of Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, vol. 43, p. 221f. )
Arsenical bronze occurs in the archaeological record across the globe, the earliest artifacts so far known have been found on the Iranian plateau in the 5th millennium BCE. [Thornton, C.P.; Lamberg-Karlovsky, C.C.; Liezers, M.; Young, S.M.M. (2002). "On pins and needles: tracing the evolution of copper-based alloying at Tepe Yahya, Iran, via ICP-MS analysis of Common-place items."Journal of Archaeological Science 29 (29): 1451–1460.]

Some metalware terms which spread across a wide contact area of the Bronze Age may be cited merely as a reference list to explore further the spread of specific sememes as in the case of ayas ‘metal, bronze’:
http://www.george-broderick.de/INDO-EUROPEAN.docGeorge Broderick, 2009,Indo-European and non-Indo-European aspects to the languages and place-names in Britain and Ireland explains non-Indo-European features of Insular Celtic in the realms of syntax, phonology, lexicon, place-names. “Given that the Celtic derivations appear unsatisfactory Vennemann (1998: 464-465) offers the meaning ‘copper island’ for Ériu deriving from Paleosemitic Etyma from Hebrew ‘-y- ‘island’ and Akkadian werûm, erû, Assyrian often eriu(m) ‘copper, bronze’. From paleosemitic *’y-wr’(m) ‘copper island’ constructed and vocalised as *’iy+weri’um, *iyweri’im, it would be possible for such a construct to pass easily as a loanword into Greek, Latin and Celtic.

http://alterling2.narod.ru/English/MetalAngl.docValentyn Stetsyuk, Lviv; Ukraine, 1989, About some names of metals in Turkic and Indo-European languages midnycia “copper bowl” in Ukrainian (mid’ “copper”).


Munda
med ‘iron’
— Slavic
Мед [Med] Bulgarian
Медзь [medz'] Belarusian
Měď Czech
Miedź Polish
Медь [Med'] Russian
Meď Slovak
Мідь [mid'] Ukrainian

— Indo-Iranian/Iranian
Мис [Mis] Tajik

— Indo-Iranian/Indo-Aryan
مس [ms] Persian

— Indo-Iranian/Indo-Aryan
જસતનો [jasatano] Gujarati
जस्ता [jastā] Hindi
sathiya Kannada
Other (Europe)
თუთია [t'ut'ia] Georgian

Afro-Asiatic
אבץ [avats] Hebrew

Other Asiatic
നാകം [nākam] Malayalam
நாகம் [nākam] Tamil

Indo-European
Мышъяк [Myš"jak] Russian
Міш'як [miš'jak] Ukrainian

— Indo-Iranian/Iranian
Мышъяк [myš"jak] Ossetian
Арсен [Arsen, ²Mysh'yak] Tajik

Indo-European
Stannum Latin

— Indo-Iranian/Indo-Aryan
قلع [ql'] Persian
त्रपु [trapu] Hindi

Altaic
Qalay Azerbaijani
Тăхлан [Tăhlan] Chuvash
Къалайы [k"alajy] Kazakh
-- [--] Kyrgyz
Цагаан тугалга [cagaan tugalga] Mongolian
Kalay Turkish
قەلەي [qäläy] Uyghur
Qalay Uzbek

Other (Europe)
კალა [kala] Georgian

Other Asiatic
വെളുത്തീയം [veḷuttīyam]Malayalam
தகரம் [takaram] Tamil

Indo-European
Aurum Latin

— Baltic
Auksas Lithuanian
Auksos Samogitian

— Celtic
Aour Breton
Aur Welsh
Òr Gaelic (Irish)
Òr Gaelic (Scottish)
Airh Gaelic (Manx)
Owr Cornish

— Other Indo-European
Ar[i] Albanian

Indo-European
Plumbum Latin

— Indo-Iranian/Indo-Aryan
سرب [srb] Persian
સીસુંનો [sīsu'no] Gujarati
सीसा [sīsā] Hindi

Other Asiatic
കറുത്തീയം [kṟuttīyam]Malayalam
ஈயம் [īyam] Tamil


Proto-Indo-European Dictionary
IE: amsus familia germanica,occidentālis: RUN. a[n]suR; Ase; 3a2.-ōs 3a3.-āss (Oslo <As-lo ?) familia germanica, orientalis: got-lat anses 'sēmideī' familia indoriania aut Anatolia: ásu 'spīritus'; ásura 'spīritālis' 5.3.-aŋhu- 'id'; ahura 5.5.-hassu 'rex' hassa- 'genitūra' Source: Proto-Indo-European Etymological Dictionary, 2012 Fernando Lopez-Menchero, Indo-European Language Association.

ancu,  ‘iron’ (tocharian) amśu  ‘soma’(vedic)

áyas n. ʻmetal, ironʼ RV.Pa. ayō nom. sg. n. and m., aya -- n. ʻironʼ, Pk. aya -- n., Si. ya. (CDIAL 590). ayaskāṇḍa m.n. ʻ a quantity of iron, excellent iron ʼ Pāṇ. gaṇ. [áyas -- , kāˊṇḍa -- ] Si. yakaḍa ʻironʼ.(CDIAL 591). *ayaskūṭa ʻiron hammerʼ. [áyas -- , kūˊṭa -- 1] Pa. ayōkūṭa --ayak° m.; Si. yakuḷa ʻ sledge -- hammer ʼ, yavuḷa (< ayōkūṭa -- ).(CDIAL 592).

early 15c., "gold, gold-colored," also figuratively, "splendid, brilliant," from Latin aureatus "decorated with gold," from aureus "golden," from aurum "gold," from PIE *aus- (cf. Sanskrit ayah "metal," Avestan ayo, Latin aes "brass," Old English ar "brass, copper, bronze," Gothic aiz "bronze," Old Lithuanian ausas "gold"), probably related to root *aus- "to shine" (see aurora).

aes, ajos brass copper; aereus, ajesnos brassy (IE) The semantic variations across languages point to the early meaning of ayas as ‘metal, alloy bronze’.


S. Kalyanaraman
Sarasvati Research Center, July 11, 2013

TIME Magazine: 'Next PM of India', 'Modi means business'.

$
0
0
Narendra Modi on TIME's Cover
The world wakes up to India's next Leader!

‘Modi Means Business:

But can he lead India' says the cover of TIME Magazine's Asian edition.

http://s14.postimage.org/61utc22n5/modi_time.jpgAmerican weekly news magazine published since 1923, TIME is the world's largest circulation news weekly with a readership of 25 million, of which 20 million are in the US. Its latest edition puts Modi in the erstwhile company of past Indian greats like Mahatma Gandhi, Vallabhbhai Patel, Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi – who also adorned its cover.

Narendra Modi, Chief Minister of Gujarat; has transformed Gujarat into a developmental success story appreciated the world over!TIME endorses this 10-year-long journey of progress - of the state becoming "India's most industrialized and business-friendly territory". It further identifies the drivers of this success as "good planning – exactly what so much of India lacks", and a leader with the "ability to get things done".
Appreciating how Gujarat has "largely escaped the land conflicts and petty corruptionthat often paralyze growth elsewhere in the nation", the article talks of how "Modi has set about revamping the State's economy" leveraging on Gujarat's natural advantages. Amongst the State's many strengths that the article mentions, is Gujarat's being the only state in India where both big businesses and small farmers can expect 24 hours uninterrupted power supply - with "the premium rates paid by big business used to subsidize rural electrification." Further examples include the establishment of a "streamlined bureaucracy", as well as the State's emergence as an Auto-hub over the last 10 years – with Gujarat's auto industry growing "from one modest plant to an expected capacity of 700,000 cars in 2014".

Praising Narendra Modi the person as well, TIME highlights how unlike many other politicians, "Modi doesn't put his faith on display", having no religious icons in his office – which instead has only statues of his hero, Swami Vivekananda. It further points out how "in a country where nepotism and dynastic politics are the norm, Modi's family is invisible." 


TIME acknowledges the public perception of Modi being seen as a "firm, no-nonsense leader who will set the nation on a course of development that might finally put it on par with China". Maybe it's about time, the Indian Media takes a cue from America's TIME – giving credit where it is due, and recognizing the winds of change as they flow by ...

Listed below are sections from the article, copied verbatim:

"What's certain is that during his 10 years in power in Gujarat, the state has become India's most industrialized and business-friendly territory, having largely escaped the land conflicts and petty corruption that often paralyze growth elsewhere in the nation."

"Gujarat's $85 billion economy may not be the largest in India, but it has prospered without the benefit of natural resources, fertile farmland, a big population center like Mumbai or a lucrative high-tech hub like Bangalore. Gujarat's success, even Modi's detractors acknowledge, is a result of good planning — exactly what so much of India lacks."

"But when others think of someone who can bring India out of the mire of chronic corruption and inefficiency — of affirm, no-nonsense leader who will set the nation on a course of development that might finally put it on par with China — they think of Modi."

"Modi has set about revamping the state's economy by attracting high-value manufacturing companies, whose bosses are now among his staunchest backers."

"Modi took Gujarat's natural advantages — its long coastline, non-unionized labor force and a develop-able land bank of thousands of acres — and added the streamlined bureaucracy and reliable electricity supply that big industry craves. Today Gujarat is the only state in Indiawhere both big businesses and small farmers can expect an uninterrupted power supplyfor nearly 24 hours a day, with the premium rates paid by big business used to subsidize rural electrification." 

"In 10 years, Gujarat's auto industry has grown from one modest plant to an expected capacity of 700,000 cars in 2014, including billion-dollar investments announced last year by Ford and Peugeot. "It is not luck," Modi says. "It's a carefully devised process.""

"His ability to get things done is in stark contrast to the Congress-led central government in New Delhi."

"In a recent opinion poll by the magazine India Today, 24% of those surveyed thought Modi should be the next Prime Minister; Rahul Gandhi polled 17%."

"his successes at the state level — two re-elections with solid majorities and an unmatched record on economic growth

"Unlike many Indian politicians, though, Modi doesn't put his faith on display. There are no religious icons in his office; the only adornments are two statues of his hero, the philosopher Swami Vivekananda."

"In a country where nepotism and dynastic politics are the norm, Modi's family (he is the middle child of nine siblings) is invisible. One younger brother works in the state government but "he has never come to my office in the last 10 years," Modi says. 

Destructive governance of SoniaG UPA -- Pratap Bhanu Mehta

$
0
0

While we were silent

Pratap Bhanu Mehta Posted online: Thu Jul 11 2013, 04:26 hrs

A story of destructive governance and citizens who did not speak out

First, the UPA came for the roads sector. They destroyed contracting. They slowed down road construction. They left highways half built. We did not speak out. After all, the only reason the NDA could have started the golden quadrilateral is because they wanted to spread Hindutva.

Next, they came for the airline sector. They let Air India suck more money from taxpayers. They let bad regulation destroy the private sector. They let crony banking sustain bad bets. They ensured India would never be an aviation hub. We did not speak out. After all, flying is what birds do, not humans. Besides, aviation is bad for climate change.

Then they came for the power sector. They confused creation of mega capacities with actual generation. They had no rational pricing plans. They were arbitrary in the awarding of licences. They could not make up their mind whether they wanted to protect the environment or destroy it. We did not speak out. After all, the only power that matters is political. Electricity be damned.

Then they came for education. They promulgated the RTE after 100 per cent enrolment. They expanded capacity, but cut-offs still rose. They regulated in such a way that there was a glut in some subjects and a shortage in others. They confused university buildings with building universities. We did not speak out. After all our, our low quality education left us incapable of speaking out.

Then they came for industry. They turned the clock back in every way and waged open war. Ensure that regulations become more complex and uncertain. Ensure that input costs rise. Ensure crummy infrastructure. Promulgate a land scam policy known as SEZ and sell it as industrial policy. They encouraged FDI. But they forgot which one they wanted: outbound or inbound. But we did not speak out. After all, India is a rural country.

Then they came for employment. There was some growth. But they decided that the only good employment is that which has the hand of the state. So the NREGA’s expansion was seen as a sign of success, not failure. By its own logic, if more people need the NREGA, the economy has failed. But we did not speak out. After all, the more people we have dependent on government, the more we think it is a good government.

Then they came for agriculture. First, they create artificial shortages through irrigation scams. Then they have a myopic policy for technology adoption. Then they decide India shall remain largely a wheat and rice economy; we will have shortages for everything else. Then they price everything to produce perverse incentives. But we did not speak out. After all, why worry about food production when the government is giving you a legal right? Is there anything more reassuring than social policy designed by and for lawyers?

Then they came for institutions. They always had. This has been Congress DNA for four decades. They drew up a list of institutions that remained unscathed: Parliament, the IB, bureaucracy and you name it. They then went after those. They used institutions as instruments of their political design. They demoralised every single branch of government. But we did not speak out. After all, this was reform by stealth. Destroy government from within.

Then they came for inflation. They confused a GDP target of 10 per cent with an inflation target. Inflation will come down next quarter, we were told. Then they tried to buy us out. Inflation: no problem. Simply get the government to spend even more. Then they pretended inflation is a problem for the rich. Then they simply stopped talking about it. We did not speak out. After all, for some, inflation is just a number

Then they came for the telecom sector. They got greedy and milked it. They got arbitrary and retrospectively taxed it. But we did not speak out. After all, new communication can be a threat to government. Besides, we can always revert to fixed lines. More digging is good.

Then they came for financial stability. They produced a large deficit. They brought the current account deficit close to an unsustainable point. They nearly wrecked the banking sector. They created every macro-economic instability you can imagine, which makes investment difficult. But we did not speak out. After all, what would you rather have: macro economic stability or a free lunch?

Then they came for regulation. It was back to the 1970s. More arbitrary regulation is good. More rules are good. Uncertainty makes business more adept. The answer to every administrative problem is enacting a new law. Multiple regulators are good because they represent the diversity of India. We did not speak out. After all, just like the religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse regulation with outcomes.

Then they came after freedom. They promulgated more restrictive rules for everything: freedom of expression, right to assembly and protest, foreign scholars. They used sedition laws. They kept the architecture of colonial laws intact. They said they stood against communal forces. But then they let Digvijaya Singh keep the communal pot boiling. They matched BJP’s communal politicisation of terrorism at every step and then some. We did not speak out. After all, if they are not Hindutva forces, they cannot be a threat to peace and liberty.

Then they came for virtue itself. They preached, from the very summit of power: avoid responsibility. It will always be someone else’s fault. They legitimised being corrupt: you are entitled to it if you are the party of the poor. They encouraged subterfuge to the point that members of the cabinet were subverting each other. They pretended that integrity is a word that does not mean anything. To independent thinkers, they said: why think when there is 10 Janpath? We did not speak out. After all, virtue and thinking can both be outsourced.

Then they came for the poor. They visited their houses and slept in their homes. They liked the experience so much they decided to become growth sceptics. Enact policies that keep India in poverty a little longer. But we did not speak out. After all, once the poor have been used as an argument, all else is immobilised.

Then they came for the citizens. They used the secularism blackmail to reduce our choices. If you are not with us you are evil they said. Then they infantilised us. You are not capable of exercising choices so we will make them for you. They acted as if we were so stupid that the three topmost leaders felt no need to justify themselves to us. But we did not speak out. After all we do have the vote.


The writer is president, Centre for Policy Research, Delhi, and a contributing editor for ‘The Indian Express’
express@expressindia.com

http://www.indianexpress.com/story-print/1140199/

Money spent on Sethu under scanner -- Deccan Chronicle

$
0
0

Money spent on Sethu under scanner

DC | M. Aruloli | 26th Feb 2013
Aerial Photo - File
Aerial Photo - File
Tirunelveli: Fishermen, leaders in the coastal districts of the south have demanded an enquiry into the amount spent for the controversial Sethu project till it was stayed by the Supreme Court on September 1, 2007.
The cost estimation was done in an unscientific manner following the withdrawal of Axis bank from its earlier agreement of offering a loan of about Rs 1,500 crore for the project at 7 per cent interest, alleged Mr Anton Gomez, president of the ILO-affiliated National Union of Fishermen (NUF).
He said the Union government had increased its share from the original Cabinet committee and finance committee-approved Rs 450 crore to Rs 785.88 crore by allotting Rs 150 crore, Rs 111.88 crore and Rs 524 crore in three consecutive Union budgets since 2005. “This revision of the Union government’s share in the Sethusamudram Ship Channel Project (SSCP), however, was not properly approved by Parliament or the Cabinet or finance committee,” said Mr Gomez.
More than that, the contradictory statements of then Union shipping minister T.R. Baalu and Union minister for statistics and programme implementation, Mr G.K. Vasan, over the amount spent for the project for the two years from 2005 raked up the suspicion of gross financial misappropriation in the implementation of the Sethu project.
“While Mr Baalu told the media on September 22, 2007 that Rs 600 crore was spent and 80 per cent of the project was completed, the Union ministry of statistics and programme implementation report (December 2008, page-358) states that Rs 576.71 crore was spent to complete 58 per cent of the project up to March 2008,” noted Mr Gomez, who added that even after the project was stayed by the Supreme Court in September 2007, the government allotted Rs 10 crore for the project in its 2008 budget.
Thus, the fishermen leader smells something fishy in the Sethu project and demands a detailed enquiry before the Union government resuming the project.
Based on the alleged financial malpractice in the SSCP, fishermen leaders like Prof Fathima Babu, M. Pushparayan, John P. Rayan plan to kick-off a mass campaign that is expected to receive the backing of the AIADMK and BJP. “We are working on coordinating our community leaders in the six coastal districts of Tamil Nadu on the issue,” said Prof Fathima Babu, who has written to Greenpeace seeking support in their fight against the Sethu project.

http://www.deccanchronicle.com/130226/news-current-affairs/article/money-spent-sethu-under-scanner

Most UK children will be born out of wedlock by 2016

$
0
0

Most children will be born out of wedlock within three years because of the decline in marriage, according to official figures.

The number of women aged over 40 having children reached a record 29,994, up from just 6,519 in 2002.
Married couples to get tax break 'very shortly', promises PM
Married couples will be given tax breaks worth up to £150 each under plans that will become law by the end of the year. Photo: ALAMY

The proportion of children born to unmarried mothers hit a record 47.5 per cent last year, according to the Office for National Statistics. The figure has risen from 25 per cent in 1988 and just 11 per cent in 1979.
If the trend continues at the current rate, the majority of children will be born to parents who are not married by 2016.
Conservative MPs and experts warned that the stark decline of marriage is likely to lead to more family breakdowns and damage children's prospects.
Tim Loughton, the former Children's minister, called on the government to introduce tax breaks for married couples to help stop the decline. He said: "If people are prepared to make a public declaration to each other in front of their friends and family they are more likely to stay together. Without marriage people drift in and out of relationships very easily.
"In families where parents break up children do less well at school, are more likely to suffer mental health problems and are more likely to have substance abuse problems.
"The government needs to send a very clear message that it supports marriage. That's why married tax breaks are so important."
David Cameron has pledged to introduce legislation to give couples tax breaks worth £150 by the end of the year.
The Prime Minister has been forced to put a timetable on government plans to recognise marriage in the tax system amid growing Conservative unrest over the failure to act.
Last year a total of 346,595 babies were born outside marriage and civil partnerships in England and Wales, equivalent to 47.5 per cent.
In 2002 the proportion was 40.6 per cent, and if the trend continues at the same rate more than half of children will be born out of wedlock by 2016.
According to the 2011 Census, the number of people who are married in England and Wales has fallen from just over half of the population a decade ago to 45 per cent.
The figures represented the first time since the Census was founded in 1801 that married couples have been in a minority.
More than 11 million people in England and Wales are single, reflecting the growing number who have chosen not to marry, while more than 5million unmarried people live with their partners.
A total of 150,000 declared themselves to be in civil partnerships.
The Centre for Social Justice, a think tank founded by the Conservative Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith, has raised repeated concerns about the decline in marriage.
Christian Guy, director of the think tank, said: "Marriage is not a right wing obsession, but a crucial social justice issue. People throughout society want to marry but cultural and financial barriers faced by those in the poorest communities thwart their aspirations.
"Evidence shows quite clearly that children growing up with married parents tend to have better life chances. The Government must deliver on its family friendly pledge."
The official figures show that 729,674 children were born in 2012 and mothers now have an average of two children each, the highest fertility rate since the 1970s.
The rise in the birth rates has been driven by immigration and women chosing to have children later in life.
The number of women aged over 40 having children reached a record 29,994, up from just 6,519 in 2002.
The average age of mothers has risen to 29.8 years in 2012, compared to 27 in 1982. The ONS said: “These trends reflect the increasing numbers of women delaying childbearing to later ages.
“This may be due to a number of factors such as increased participation in higher education, increased female participation in the labour force, the increasing importance of a career, the rising opportunity costs of childbearing, labour market uncertainty, housing factors and instability of partnership.”
The figures also show that one in four new mothers were born outside the UK in 2012, compared to 17.7 per cent a decade earlier.
The ONS said that foreign-born mothers have a higher fertility rate, and are likely to increase their chance of conceiving by having children earlier.
The rising birth rate has been fueled by high levels of immigration from Eastern Europe after accession countries joined the European Union in 2004.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10172627/Most-children-will-be-born-out-of-wedlock-by-2016.html

Food Bill: Amartya Sen’s charlatan economics debunked -- R Jagannathan

$
0
0

Food Bill: Amartya Sen’s charlatan economics debunked

by  Jul 10, 2013
Amartya Sen, the intellectual patron of many of the UPA’s economic follies, of which the latest – the Food Security Bill – is on the cusp of ruining things further, deserves to be debunked.
Once lauded for his work on famine and hunger, Sen today is a practitioner of charlatan economics that has very little to do with helping the poor.
Commonsense should tell us that acute hunger is more or less gone – except in some pockets of India. Malnutrition, of course, is another matter, since it involves a whole lot of other inputs from maternal care and giving children enough nutrition once they are born. Neither of these problems is going to be solved by giving two-thirds of India (more than 800 million people) rice, wheat and coarse cereals at Rs 3, Rs 2 and Re 1 a kg.
Ruining the economy, of course, is entirely possible with this mindless scheme.
Dealing with malnutrition calls for an entirely different approach to food security – and the UPA’s next flagship folly comes nowhere near addressing it. And yet, Amartya Sen is backing a bad idea.
Dealing with malnutrition calls for an entirely different approach to food security – and the UPA’s next flagship folly comes nowhere near addressing it. And yet, Amartya Sen is backing a bad idea.
Dealing with malnutrition calls for an entirely different approach to food security – and the UPA’s next flagship folly comes nowhere near addressing it. And yet, Amartya Sen is backing a bad idea.
Sen’s charlatan economics have been repeatedly exposed by more sensible economists.
Today’s Business Standard, for example, has an article by Arvind Subramanian, Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and Center for Global Development, which rubbishes Sen’s stand on food security. (Read here).
Critiquing Sen’s backing for the UPA’s entitlements-based policy framework, of which the Food Bill is only the latest exhibit, Subramanian gives five solid reason why this approach is seriously flawed.
One, it causes economic instability and vulnerability. The domestic slowdown and the antics of the rupee are clear evidence of this. No further proof is required of the damage caused by UPA-nomics.
Two, the rights-based approach “legitimises atrocious policies”. Leave alone food, Subramanian shows how energy subsidies have ballooned over the last 10 years of UPA rule, distorting the choices people make in multiple spheres – from bad crop patterns to wrong fertiliser use to under-investment in power.
Three, the rights-based approach also “undervalues opportunity costs”. Subramanian gives the example of the right to education (RTE) – an enormously expensive exercise with doubtful payoffs. It would have been far cheaper and more effective to focus on ensuring teachers turned up for work – thus improving student learning. The RTE is an extravagance the country could have done without, when cheaper and more focused solutions were possible. The UPA never weighed the costs of what could have been done with the money spent – hence incurring a huge opportunity cost.
Four, Subramanian correctly suggests that the rights-based approach overburdens the state’s capabilities. The state’s first duty is to protect its people, deliver law and order, and ensure basic rights, and public facilities. When the focus shifts to private welfare benefits such as providing food and homesteads, the state fails to deliver on public goods, as Ajay Shah points out in this article.
Five, ultimately, overburdening the state leads to its weakness. Subramanian says that when the state does not provide the basics of protection, health and education services, and focuses instead on redistribution, it loses the allegiance of the middle class. They will evade taxes, educate their children abroad, live in gated colonies, and generally turn away from the state.
Concludes Subramanian, who started out as an admirer of Sen: “For this admirer of Professor Sen’s exceptional academic work, two ironies stand out. His Nobel-winning insight was about the importance of broad purchasing power rather than the narrow (physical) availability of food in avoiding famines and mass starvation. It is curious, even mystifying, therefore, to see him forcefully advocate, through morbidity-laden polemic, the physical provision of one type of food – cereals, which are rapidly declining in people’s consumption basket – to help reduce malnutrition.”
But it is not only Subramanian who is disillusioned with UPA’s voodoo economics and Sen’s efforts to give it intellectual heft. Earlier, Arvind Panagariya of Columbia University spoke out when Sen made a fool of himself by claiming that every week’s delay in the Food Bill caused 1,000 deaths.
Panagariya told The Economic Times: “I  was taken aback when I heard Sen forcefully attribute a specific number of child deaths of “1,000 per week” to the lack of passage of the Food Security Bill on a TV debate… I am mystified by how one can attribute a precise number of child deaths to the absence of a policy that has not been in place for a single day, a policy that is subject to so many lapses and leakages along the implementation chain, whose impact critically depends on how the beneficiaries adjust their consumption in response to it, and which can after all potentially impact only calorie intake and no other causes of death.”
Swaminathan Aiyar also scuttled Sen’s pretentions by taking up Sen on his own calculations. Using figures for losses in the public distribution system caused by leakages and graft, he calculates that the Food Security Bill – which Sen claimed cost 1,000 lives per week due to non-implementation, or around 50,000 lives per annum – would cost at least Rs 50,000 crore more even according to official estimates.
Asks Aiyar: “Even if the Bill saves 50,000 lives, it will cost an additional Rs 50,000 crore. Aren’t there cheaper ways of saving lives than Rs 1 crore per head?”
(Read Arvind Subramanian’s full Business Standard article here)

How TIME distorts news by posting photo essays with irrelevant photos & motivated reporting

$
0
0

The Face of Buddhist Terror

It's a faith famous for its pacifism and tolerance. But in several of Asia's Buddhist-majority nations, monks are inciting bigotry and violence — mostly against Muslims



ADAM DEAN / PANOS FOR TIME
U Wirathu, the spiritual leader of the 969 Buddhist Nationalist movement, and his entourage leave after giving a sermon, at a monastery in Mandalay, Myanmar (Burma) on May 22, 2013. U Wirathu is an abbot in the New Maesoeyin Monastery where he leads about 60 monks and has influence over more than 2,500 residing there. He travels the country giving sermons to religious and laypeople encouraging Buddhists to shun Muslim business and communities.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2146000,00.html

Photo Essay

 | By Hannah Beech


When Buddhists Go Bad: Photographs by Adam DeanAdam Dean—Panos for TIME

Click here to find out more!
A Wirathu supporter bows at his feet outside his quarters at the New Maesoeyin Monastery in Mandalay.

People drive past a burnt-out vehicle and damaged buildings, including a mosque, in the Mingalar Zayyone Muslim quarter, which was razed by Buddhists in ethnic violence in March, in Meikhtila, Burma.


Students of Wirathu study at the New Maesoeyin Monastery in Mandalay
Monks wash at the New Maesoeyin Monastery.
A supporters of Wirathu looks at photos of him on the wall of his quarters at the New Maesoeyin Monastery.

A monk is reflected in the Wirathu's silhouette as he drives out of the New Maesoeyin Monastery.
Villagers from Kyaw Min drive ahead of Wirathu's vehicle as he arrives to give a sermon at the Shwe Areleain Monastery in Kyaw Min Village, Myiamu Township, Burma.
A skull on the ground near a Buddhist graveyard, which appears to have been recently desecrated in Meikhtila, Burma.
A teacher (second from left) who used to be protected by Chanchote Phetpong looks at his body in the Mass Casualty Zone of Yarang Hospital.
urned trees and damaged buildings are seen through the window of a destroyed house in the Mingalar Zayyone Muslim quarter, which was razed by Buddhists in ethnic violence in March, in Meikhtila, Burma.

Villagers from Kyaw Min chant and pray as they wait for Wirathu's sermon at the Shwe Areleain Monastery.

The Imam of Talanburee Mosque, which was attacked by Buddhist nationalists in 1997, prays in Mandalay, Burma.

A soldier from the 23rd Pattani Battalion of the Thai Army closes the door of an armored troop carrier during a patrol in Pattani, Southern Thailand.
A Thai Army soldier provides security as monks from the Nopawong Saram Temple collect alms on their morning rounds in Pattani, Southern Thailand.

Lieutenant Sawai Kongsit (center) talks to military trainers from the 23rd Battalion of the Thai Army (left) and Buddhist volunteer defense militia (right) during a training session at the Lak Muang Temple in Pattani.
Soldiers from the 23rd Battalion of the Thai Army provide security as monks from the Lak Muang Temple collect alms in Pattani.
Thai Army Rangers look at the body of recently deceased Chanchote Phetpong, 28, in the Mass Casualty Zone of Yarang Hospital, in Southern Thailand. He was killed by a bomb while on patrol for a peace meeting in Kradoh Village near Pattani. Two other Rangers were also wounded.
Sumoh Makeh, 51, the mother of Subri Dotaeset, 24, weeps during an interview in her home in Talok Hala Village near Yala, Southern Thailand. Subri, a suspected insurgent, was shot and killed in an ambush while attacking a Marine base.

The photographs were taken in May and June 2013.


Wirathu, the spiritual leader of the 969 Buddhist Nationalist movement, and his entourage leave after giving a sermon at a monastery in Mandalay, Burma.The spectacle of faith makes for luminous photography. Buddhism, in particular, lends itself to the lens: those shaven heads and richly hued monastic robes; the swirls of incense; the pure expressions of devotees to a religion whose first precept is “do not kill.” But as photographer Adam Dean and I discovered when traveling through Burma and Thailand from May to June, Buddhism’s pacifist image is being challenged by a radical strain that marries spirituality with ethnic chauvinism. In Buddhist-majority Burma, where communal clashes have proliferated over the past year, scores of Muslims have been killed by Buddhist mobs, while in Thailand and Sri Lanka the fabric binding temple and state is being stitched ever tighter.
The godfather of radical Buddhism is a monk named Wirathu, a slight presence with an outsized message of hate. Adam followed Wirathu, who has taken the title of “Burmese bin Laden,” around Mandalay in central Burma, as he preached his loathing of the country’s Muslim minority to schoolchildren and housewives alike. In March, tensions detonated in the town of Meikhtila, where communal violence ended dozens of lives, mostly Muslim. Entire Muslim quarters were razed by Buddhists hordes. Even today, anxiety churns. One late afternoon as Adam walked near Wirathu’s monastic compound, a monk hurled a brick at him. Burgundy robes cannot camouflage inborn hostility.
Adam Dean for TIME
Adam Dean for TIME
The cover of this week's TIME International.
In Southern Thailand, which was once united as a Muslim Malay sultanate, monks count on soldiers to shield them from harm. A separatist insurgency has claimed around 5,000 lives since 2004, and while more Muslims have died, it is Buddhists who feel particularly vulnerable as targets of shadowy militants. The Thai military now stations its troops in Buddhist temple compounds, further cleaving a pair of religions whose followers once shared each other’s feast days. One morning in mid-June, a bomb exploded in Kradoh, Pattani province, as Thai rangers patrolled a street where a peace and reconciliation meeting was taking place. Chanchote Phetpong, 28, who was clutching a bag of rose apples as he strolled, endured the brunt of the explosion; his orphaned fruit lay scattered in a pool of his blood.
At the nearby Yarang hospital, Adam photographed as teachers, mostly Buddhist, came to pay their respects to the dead ranger, who normally protected them as they walked to school each day. A Muslim nurse with a head covering quietly plucked shrapnel out of Chanchote’s face, cleaning him up for his funeral, while another tended to one of his wounded comrades. A clutch of Buddhist rangers looked on. The nurses’ veils felt like a reproach, a symbol of the divide between faiths in this nervous land. “They are scared of all of us,” whispered one Muslim hospital worker. “We used to have trust but that’s gone.”

Adam Dean is a photographer based in Beijing. He is represented by Panos Pictures.
Hannah Beech is TIME’s China bureau chief and East Asia correspondent.
http://lightbox.time.com/2013/06/20/when-buddhists-go-bad-photographs-by-adam-dean/#1

Straying From the Middle Way: Extremist Buddhist Monks Target Religious Minorities


The fault lines of conflict are often spiritual, one religion chafing against another and kindling bloodletting contrary to the values girding each faith. Over the past year in parts of Asia, it is friction between Buddhism and Islam that has killed hundreds, mostly Muslims. The violence is being fanned by extremist Buddhist monks, who preach a dangerous form of religious chauvinism to their followers.
Yet as this week’s TIME International cover story notes, Buddhism has tended to avoid a linkage in our minds to sectarian strife:
“In the reckoning of religious extremism — Hindu nationalists, Muslim militants, fundamentalist Christians, ultra-Orthodox Jews — Buddhism has largely escaped trial. To much of the world, it is synonymous with nonviolence and loving kindness, concepts propagated by Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, 2,500 years ago. But like adherents of any religion, Buddhists and their holy men are not immune to politics and, on occasion, the lure of sectarian chauvinism.
When Asia rose up against empire and oppression, Buddhist monks, with their moral command and plentiful numbers, led anticolonial movements. Some starved themselves for their cause, their sunken flesh and protruding ribs underlining their sacrifice for the laity. Perhaps most iconic is the image of Thich Quang Duc, a Vietnamese monk sitting in the lotus position, wrapped in flames, as he burned to death in Saigon while protesting the repressive South Vietnamese regime 50 years ago. In 2007, Buddhist monks led a foiled democratic uprising in Burma: images of columns of clerics bearing upturned alms bowls, marching peacefully in protest against the junta, earned sympathy around the world, if not from the soldiers who slaughtered them. But where does social activism end and political militancy begin? Every religion can be twisted into a destructive force poisoned by ideas that are antithetical to its foundations. Now it’s Buddhism’s turn.”
Over the past year in Buddhist-majority Burma, scores, if not hundreds, have been killed in communal clashes, with Muslims suffering the most casualties. Burmese monks were seen goading on Buddhist mobs, while some suspect the authorities of having stoked the violence — a charge the country’s new quasi-civilian government denies. In Sri Lanka, where a conservative, pro-Buddhist government reigns, Buddhist nationalist groups are operating with apparent impunity, looting Muslim and Christian establishments and calling for restrictions to be placed on the 9% of the country that is Muslim. Meanwhile in Thailand’s deep south, where a Muslim insurgency has claimed some 5,000 lives since 2004, desperate Buddhist clerics are retreating into their temples with Thai soldiers at their side. Their fear is understandable. But the close relationship between temple and state is further dividing this already anxious region.
As the violence mounts, will Buddhists draw inspiration from their faith’s sutras of compassion and peace to counter religious chauvinism? Or will they succumb to the hate speech of radical monks like Burma’s Wirathu, who goads his followers to “rise up” against Islam? The world’s judgment awaits.
http://world.time.com/2013/06/20/extremist-buddhist-monks-fight-oppression-with-violence/

The Face of Buddhist Terror

20130701_600

Monday, Jul. 01, 2013
When Buddhists Go Bad
By Hannah Beech / MeikhtilaBurma, and Pattani, Thailand
His face as still and serene as a statue’s, the Buddhist monk who has taken the title “the Burmese bin Laden” begins his sermon. Hundreds of worshippers sit before him, palms pressed together, sweat trickling silently down their sticky backs. On cue, the crowd chants with the man in burgundy robes, the mantras drifting through the sultry air of a temple in Mandalay, Burma’s second biggest city after Rangoon. It seems a peaceful scene, but Wirathu’s message crackles with hate. “Now is not the time for calm,” the 46-year-old monk intones, as he spends 90 minutes describing the many ways in which he detests the minority Muslims in this Buddhist-majority land. “Now is the time to rise up, to make your blood boil.”
Buddhist blood is boiling in Burma, also known as Myanmar — and plenty of Muslim blood is being spilled. Over the past year, Buddhist mobs have targeted members of the minority faith. The authorities say scores of Muslims have been killed; international human-rights workers put the number in the hundreds. Much of the violence was directed against the Rohingya, a largely stateless Muslim group in Burma’s far west that the U.N. calls one of the world’s most persecuted people. The communal bloodshed then spread to central Burma, where Wirathu lives and preaches his virulent sermons. The radical monk sees Muslims, who make up at least 5% of Burma’s estimated 60 million people, as a threat to the country and its culture. “[Muslims] are breeding so fast and they are stealing our women, raping them,” he tells me. “They would like to occupy our country, but I won’t let them. We must keep Myanmar Buddhist.”
Such hate speech threatens the delicate political ecosystem in a country peopled by at least 135 ethnic groups that has only recently been unshackled from nearly half a century of military rule. Already some government officials are calling for implementation of a ban, rarely enforced during the military era, on Rohingya women’s bearing more than two children. And many Christians in the country’s north say recent fighting between the Burmese military and ethnic Kachin insurgents, who are mostly Christian, was exacerbated by the religious divides.
Radical Buddhism is also thriving in other parts of Asia. This year in Sri Lanka, Buddhist nationalist groups with links to high-ranking officialdom have gained prominence, and monks have helped orchestrate the destruction of Muslim and Christian property. And in Thailand’s deep south, where a Muslim insurgency has claimed some 5,000 lives since 2004, the Thai army trains civilian militias and often accompanies Buddhist monks when they leave their temples to collect alms, as their faith asks of them. The commingling of soldiers and monks — some of whom have armed themselves — only heightens the alienation felt by Thailand’s minority Muslims.
Although each nation’s history dictates the course radical Buddhism has taken within its borders, growing access to the Internet means that prejudice and rumors are instantly inflamed with each Facebook post or tweet. Violence can easily spill across borders. In June in Malaysia, where hundreds of thousands of Burmese migrants work, several Buddhist Burmese were killed — likely in retribution, Malaysian authorities say, for the deaths of Muslims back in Burma.
In the reckoning of religious extremism — Hindu nationalists, Muslim militants, fundamentalist Christians,ultra-Orthodox Jews — Buddhism has largely escaped trial. To much of the world, it is synonymous with nonviolence and loving kindness, concepts propagated by Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, 2,500 years ago. But like adherents of any religion, Buddhists and their holy men are not immune to politics and, on occasion, the lure of sectarian chauvinism.
When Asia rose up against empire and oppression, Buddhist monks, with their moral command and plentiful numbers, led anticolonial movements. Some starved themselves for their cause, their sunken flesh and protruding ribs underlining their sacrifice for the laity. Perhaps most iconic is the image of Thich Quang Duc, a Vietnamese monk sitting in the lotus position, wrapped in flames, as he burned to death in Saigon while protesting the repressive South Vietnamese regime 50 years ago. In 2007, Buddhist monks led a foiled democratic uprising in Burma: images of columns of clerics bearing upturned alms bowls, marching peacefully in protest against the junta, earned sympathy around the world, if not from the soldiers who slaughtered them. But where does social activism end and political militancy begin? Every religion can be twisted into a destructive force poisoned by ideas that are antithetical to its foundations. Now it’s Buddhism’s turn.
Mantra of Hate
Sitting cross-legged on a raised platform at the New Masoeyein monastery in Mandalay, next to a wall covered by life-size portraits of himself, Wirathu expounds on his worldview. U.S. President Barack Obamahas “been tainted by black Muslim blood.” Arabs have hijacked the U.N., he believes, although he sees no irony in linking his name to that of an Arab terrorist. Around 90% of Muslims in Burma are “radical bad people,” says Wirathu, who was jailed for seven years for his role in inciting anti-Muslim pogroms in 2003. He now leads a movement called 969 — the figure represents various attributes of the Buddha — which calls on Buddhists to fraternize only among themselves. “Taking care of our religion and race is more important than democracy,” says Wirathu.
It would be easy to dismiss Wirathu as an uneducated outlier with little doctrinal basis for his bigotry, one of eight children who ended up in a monastery because his parents wanted one less mouth to feed. But Wirathu is charismatic and powerful, and his message resonates. Among the country’s majority Bamar — or Burman — ethnic group, as well as across Buddhist parts of Asia, there’s a vague sense that their religion is under siege, that Islam has already conquered Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Afghanistan — all these formerly Buddhist lands — and that other dominoes could fall. Even without proof, Buddhist nationalists fear that local Muslim populations are increasing faster than their own, and they worry about Middle Eastern money pouring in to build new mosques.
Since Burma began its reforms in 2011, with the junta giving way to a quasi-civilian government, surprisingly few people have called for holding the army accountable for its repressive rule. This equanimity has been ascribed to the Buddhist spirit of forgiveness. But Burma’s democratization has also allowed extremist voices to proliferate and unleashed something akin to ethnic cleansing. The trouble began last year in the far west, where clashes between local Buddhists and Muslims claimed a disproportionate number of Muslim lives. Machete-wielding Buddhist hordes attacked Rohingya villages; 70 Muslims were slaughtered in a daylong massacre in one hamlet, according to Human Rights Watch. The communal violence, which the government has done little to check, has since migrated to other parts of the country. In March, dozens were killed and tens of thousands left homeless as homes and mosques were razed. Children were hacked apart and women torched. In several instances, monks were seen goading on frenzied Buddhists.
In late March, the transport hub of Meikhtila burned for days, with entire Muslim quarters razed by Buddhist mobs after a monk was killed by Muslims. (The official death toll: two Buddhists and at least 40 Muslims.) Thousands of Muslims are still crammed into refugee camps where journalists are forbidden to enter. I was able to meet the family of 15-year-old Abdul Razak Shahban, one of at least 20 students at a local madrasah who were killed. Razak’s own life ended when a nail-studded plank was slammed against his skull. “My son was killed because he was Muslim, nothing else,” Razak’s mother Rahamabi told me, in the shadow of a burned-out mosque.
Temple and State
Dreams of repelling Islam and ensuring the dominance of Buddhism animate the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS), Sri Lanka’s most powerful Buddhist organization whose name means Buddhist Strength Army. At the group’s annual convention in February in a suburb of Sri Lanka’s capital Colombo, more than 100 monks led the proceedings, as followers clutched Buddhist flags, clasped their right hand to their chest and pledged to defend their religion. Founded just a year ago, the BBS insists that Sri Lanka, the world’s oldest continually Buddhist nation, needs to robustly reclaim its spiritual roots. It wants monks to teach history in government schools and has called for religious headscarves to be banned, even though 9% of the population is Muslim. Said BBS general secretary and monk Galaboda Aththe Gnanasara Thero at the group’s annual meeting: “This is a Buddhist government. This is a Buddhist country.”
Hard-line monks, like those in the BBS, have turned on minority Muslims and Christians, especially since the 26-year war against the largely Hindu Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam insurgency ended four years ago. After President Mahinda Rajapaksa, a conservative, was elected in 2005, Buddhist supremacist groups became more powerful. In recent months, their campaign of intimidation has included attacks on a Muslim-owned clothing store, a Christian pastor’s house and a Muslim-linked slaughterhouse. Despite monks’ being captured on video leading some of the marauding, none have been charged. Indeed, temple and state are growing ever closer in Sri Lanka, with a monk-dominated party serving as a coalition member of the government. In March, the guest of honor at the opening ceremony for the BBS-founded Buddhist Leadership Academy was Sri Lanka’s Defense Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, the President’s brother, who said, “It is the monks who protect our country, religion and race.”
Alms in Arms
In Thailand’s deep south, it’s the monks who need help — and in their desperation some have resorted to methods contrary to Buddhism’s pacifist dogma. The southern provinces of Pattani, Yala and Narathiwat used to be part of a Malay sultanate before staunchly Buddhist Thailand annexed the region early last century. Muslims make up at least 80% of the area’s population. Since a separatist insurgency intensified in 2004, many Buddhists have been targeted because their positions — such as teachers, soldiers or government workers — are linked to the Thai state. Dozens of monks have been attacked too. Now the Thai military and other security forces have moved into the wat, as Thai Buddhist temples are known, and soldiers go out each morning with monks as they collect alms. “There’s no other choice,” says Lieutenant Sawai Kongsit. “We cannot separate Buddhism from guns anymore.”
Wat Lak Muang, in the town of Pattani, is home to 10 Buddhist monks and around 100 soldiers. The sprawling compound’s main stupa has been taken over as an operational command center for the Thai army’s 23rd battalion, with camouflage netting wrapped around the central base of the holy structure. Each year, thousands of Buddhist volunteers receive training at this wat to join armed civilian militias charged with guarding their villages. Prapaladsuthipong Purassaro, who was a monk for 16 years and now tends the temple, admits that when he wore monastic robes, he owned three pistols. “Maybe I felt a little bit guilty as a Buddhist,” he says. “But we have to protect ourselves.”
If Buddhists feel more protected by the presence of soldiers in their temples, it sends quite another signal to the Muslim population. “By inviting soldiers into the wat, the state is wedding religion to the military,” says Michael Jerryson, an assistant professor of religious studies at Youngstown State University in Ohio and author of a book about Buddhism’s role in the southern Thailand conflict. “Buddhists will never think we’re Thai people,” says Sumoh Makeh, the mother of a suspected insurgent who, with 15 others, was killed by Thai marines in February after they tried to raid a naval base. “This is our land but we are the outsiders.” After all, Muslims too are running scared in the deep south. More of them have perished in the violence than Buddhists, felled by indiscriminate bombings or whispers that they were somehow connected to the state. (By proportion of population, however, more Buddhists have died.) Yet monk after monk tells me that Muslims are using mosques to store weapons, or that every imam carries a gun. “Islam is a religion of violence,” says Phratong Jiratamo, a marine turned monk. “Everyone knows this.”
It’s a sentiment the Burmese bin Laden would endorse. I wonder how Wirathu reconciles the peaceful sutras of his faith with the anti-Muslim violence spreading across his Bamar-majority homeland. “In Buddhism, we are not allowed to go on the offensive,” he tells me. “But we have every right to defend our community.” Later, as he preaches to an evening crowd, I listen to him compel smiling housewives, students, teachers, grandmothers and others to repeat after him: “I will sacrifice myself for the Bamar race.”
The Buddhist spirit of forgiveness, though, still exists in the unlikeliest of places. In 2011, Watcharapong Suttha, a monk at Wat Lak Muang, was doing his morning alms, guarded by soldiers, when a bomb detonated. The lower half of his body is covered in shrapnel scars. Now 29 and disrobed, Watcharapong is still traumatized, his eyes darting, his body beset by twitches. But he does not blame an entire faith for his attack. “Islam is a peaceful religion, like Buddhism, like all religions,” he says. “If we blame Muslims, they will blame us. Then this violence will never end.”

http://freedomnewsgroup.com/2013/06/22/the-face-of-buddhist-terror/


Myanmar Bans TIME Magazine Issue Over ‘Buddhist Terror’ Cover

YANGON, Myanmar — Myanmar’s government has banned this week’s international issue of TIME after widespread outrage in the country over the magazine’s cover story featuring a controversial monk known as the Venerable Wirathu with the title “The Face of Buddhist Terror.”
Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
Myanmar has banned this issue of Time magazine carrying the words, “The Face of Buddhist Terror,” with a photo of a controversial Buddhist monk.
Ye Htut, spokesperson for President Thein Sein, said on his official Facebook FB +1.24% page Tuesday evening that copies of the magazine “would not be sold and distributed to prevent the recurrence of racial and religious conflict.”
TIME profiles the Venerable Wirathu, leader of the Buddhist 969 movement that advocates the social exclusion of the country’s minority Muslim population. The movement has been accused of stirring up deadly clashes between Buddhists and Muslims that have spread across the country over the past year, leaving more than 140,000 people displaced and more than 200 dead, most of whom were Muslims. Buddhist mobs have attacked mosques and Muslim businesses, and stickers and pamphlets of the 969 movement have often appeared during and after the violence.
The monk denies responsibility for the violence. But in countless media interviews, he has expressed pride in being a radical Buddhist and has called for boycotts of Muslim-owned businesses. This Thursday, he will hold a forum in order to garner support for a law he has proposed to restrict marriages between Buddhist women and anyone outside their religion, which he hopes would carry a sentence of up to 10 years in prison.
Tuesday’s ban on the publication is the first time that Myanmar’s government has put any blatant restrictions on Western media since it embarked on a series of sweeping political and economic reforms two years ago. Explaining its decision, the government said on state television Tuesday evening that the article could damage reconciliation between the two groups. It remains unclear how the Myanmar government would block access of the article online for internet users in Myanmar.
On Sunday, the president’s office issued a rare statement  condemning the magazine piece and labeling the 969 movement “peaceful.” The statement defended the Venerable Wirathu, calling him a “son of Buddha,” and said the article could negatively affect the perception of Buddhists in the country. The statement followed calls for the boycott of TIME magazine on social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter, and vociferous statements from angry Buddhists attacking the Western media and the author behind the piece personally.
Analysts say, though, that this rare condemnation from the Myanmar government could serve to embolden more radical elements within the Buddhist community, and spur further attacks on the country’s minority Muslims. Some have also criticized the TIME magazine piece for being overly provocative and for implicating the Buddhist religion rather than specific actors for violence against the country’s Muslims.
The government’s response and tacit support for the Venerable Wirathu and the 969 movement is a “really bad sign of things to come for Myanmar Muslims,” said Maung Zarni, a Burmese academic at the London School of Economics, because it allows radical elements in society to operate with impunity. Mr. Maung Zarni also criticized the TIME magazine piece for reporting that he says can have a “heavy societal cost” on the Myanmar people by whipping up tensions between the two communities.
The Venerable Wirathu, who also has spoken out against the piece, says that he won’t sue TIME magazine for defamation, what he believes is keeping true to Buddhist principles of acceptance.
Myo Myo contributed to this article.
Jun-24-2013 13:39printcomments 

Time Magazine Exposes Buddhist Terrorists in Myanmar

Mainstream magazine takes Burma's president by surprise, exposing the actions of an anti-Muslim monk named Wirathu who operates with near impunity.
Time Magazine on Buddhist terrorists
Time Magazine outs murderous Buddhist monk Wirathu this month, everywhere except America, that is.

(SACRAMENTO / FRANKFURT) - Time Magazine has outed the murderous Buddhist monk called Wirathu in this month's edition, he's the Nazi-like leader of the government sanctioned '969' movement in Burma and the ringleader in the ethnic cleansing of Muslim people there.

Of course Americans will see a different edition of the magazine.
This is the country after all, that is allowing the mass murder of Muslims to take place by turning a blind eye, so the yanks get a different version of the magazine than the rest of the world, as you can see below.
We have to wonder how many Americans realize that Time Magazine publishes several different regional versions of its publication each month. The Americans get the version that doesn't piss off corporate interests, the rest are more honest. Americans receive a "dumbed down" version. It is more in keeping with the ambitions of a country that murdered 1.5 million Iraqi people over bad intelligence. Of course many of America's victims in Iraq were also Christian.
We have written a great deal about the nature of mob oriented Buddhists in Sri Lanka and Burma in recent years.
The only two Genocides of the new century have been committed by Buddhists, while most Americans live under the false illusion that Buddhists have only peaceful tendencies, it could not be any farther from the truth.
Most Buddhists are fine, just as most Christians, Muslims and Jews are moral people, but Sinhalese Buddhists in Sri Lanka mass murdered 160,000 Hindus and Christians in 2009, and over the last year, Rakhine Buddhists in Burma, now called Myanmar, have been targeting and ruthlessly killing Muslims. Rohingya Muslims are the most endangered.
The Buddhists terrorists target people for being of the "wrong" religion, and don't think Buddhism isn't a religion, that is far from true. The excuse often given, that Buddhism is simply a faith, loses meaning when they slaughter people with machetes for being of the wrong culture. In fact it flies in the face of peaceful Buddhism the same way the Taliban fail to truly represent Islam, or the warring militant state of Israel fails to represent the Jews.


Myanmar President Thein Sein
Myanmar’s President has lashed out against Time magazine’s cover story on “Buddhist terror” for undermining government efforts to ease sectarian tensions in the country.
In a statement issued Sunday night, President Thein Sein said the Time lead article, The Face of Buddhist Terror, featuring Myanmar’s extremist monk Wirathu, could be "detrimental to the trust building between religions in Myanmar, and damage the image of Buddhism which has been the main religion of Myanmar for thousands of years." The President defended Wirathu as a member of the Sangha, the equivalent of the Buddhist clergy.
“Buddhist monks, also known as Sanghas, are noble people who keep the 277 precepts or moral rules, and strive peacefully for the prosperity of Buddhism,” his statement said.
But the notorious Wirathu stands accused of stoking anti-Muslim sentiments with his 969 movement, launched in February, that calls on Buddhists to boycott Muslim shops and businesses.
More recently he launched a campaign to pass legislation on marriages between Buddhist women and Muslim men that would require the women to receive prior permission from their parents and authorities and the men to convert to Buddhism. This is a stark violation of international law.

You can't make this stuff up, Buddhist '969' members celebrate their
anti-Muslim violence by wearing Nazi t-shirts. They all follow Wirathu.
The draft law was criticized by on again off again democracy champion Aung San Suu Kyi as being discriminatory and a violation of human rights.
One thing is certain, Wirathu, based in Mandalay, is no stranger to controversy. He received a 25 year sentence in 2003 for inciting anti-Muslim hatred, but was released last year under a general amnesty, far before his release date.
Rising sectarian violence has been among the greatest challenges to Thein Sein, who came to power in March 2011, and has since pushed through political and economic reforms.
In June 2012, Buddhist communities in the Rakhine State attacked Rohingya Muslims, leaving 167 people dead and 125,000 people homeless. That was the beginning of months of mayhem and nightmares, with Rohingya Muslims killed and abused, even tortured to death,
There have been at least three anti-Muslim riots this year in central and northern Myanmar, leaving thousands homeless.
Thein Sein, Myanmar’s first elected President in decades, insisted that his Government does not discriminate against Muslims.
"Although the majority of Myanmar people are Buddhists, the Government has recognized in Section 362 of the constitution that Christianity, Islam, Hinduism and Animism as are the existing religions in the country," he said in his statement.
He called for mutual trust building among the religions to avoid undesirable conflicts in the country’s fledgling democracy.
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/june242013/buddhist-terror-tk-mi.php

Sri Lanka bans Time magazine over Buddhist terror cover story

Associated Press Posted online: Wed Jul 03 2013, 16:38 hrs
Colombo : Sri Lanka has banned the current issue of Time magazine over a cover story on violence between Buddhists and Muslims in Myanmar because it could affect religious sentiments on this Buddhist-majority island, a customs official said Wednesday.Customs department spokesman Leslie Gamini said it has seized 4,000 copies of Time's July 1 edition, which bears a photo of Wirathu, a radical Myanmar monk, with the headline ``The Face of Buddhist Terror.''``We have decided not to release this edition'' because it could hurt religious feelings in Sri Lanka, he said. Buddhism is Sri Lanka's state religion.Myanmar's government has also banned the issue of the magazine ``to prevent the recurrence of racial and religious riots.'' Wirathu is a leader of a movement of monks that preaches that Myanmar's small Muslim minority threatens racial purity and national security. He has called for restrictions on marriages between Buddhists and Muslims, and for boycotts of Muslim-owned businesses. Nearly 250 people have died and tens of thousands, mostly Muslims, have fled their homes in religious violence in Myanmar in the past year.
Religious tension has also been on the rise in Sri Lanka. Hate speech, vilification and attacks on Muslim-owned businesses and places of worship by Sinhalese-Buddhist groups have occurred in recent months. Inaction by police and other officials has spurred allegations that the government supports the campaign, which it denies.Groups led by Buddhist monks have spread allegations that Muslims are dominating businesses and trying to take over the country demographically by increasing their birthrate and secretly sterilizing Sinhalese-Buddhists. Muslims make up 9 percent of Sri Lanka's 20 million people, while Sinhalese-Buddhists account for almost 75 percent.
International concerns have also been expressed over Sri Lankan religious tension. A U.S.-sponsored resolution on Sri Lanka at the U.N. Human Rights Council in March expressed concern over religious discrimination. U.S. Ambassador to Sri Lanka Michele J. Sison expressed alarm in April over rising hate speech and attacks against Muslims.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sri-lanka-bans-time-magazine-over-buddhist-terror-cover-story/1137202/

On Banned Time Magazine’s “Buddhist Terror” Issue

Filed under: Colombo Telegraph,Editor's Choice | 

Hatred is never appeased by hatred in this world; by non-hatred only is hatred appeased. This is an unending truth. — Dhammapada, 5
The July 1st international edition of Timemagazine has added fuel to the fire with a cover photo of the fundamentalist Burmese monk Wirathu, calling him “The Face of Buddhist Terror.”
Read more in the religiondispatches.org
Related stories;
http://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/on-banned-time-magazines-buddhist-terror-issue/

Full Text Of The Banned Time Story – “The Face Of Buddhist Terror”

Filed under: Colombo Telegraph,Most Popular,News,Popular Stories,STORIES | 
Sri Lanka on Tuesday banned the sale of the latest issue of Time magazine because of the newsweekly’s feature article on terrorism, describing recent clashes between Buddhists and Muslims.
We publish below the Full text of the cover story “The Face of Buddhist Terror” in July 01, 2013 TIME magazine;

The Face of Buddhist Terror

It’s a faith famous for its pacifism and tolerance. But in several of Asia’s Buddhist-majority nations, monks are inciting bigotry and violence — mostly against Muslims
By Hannah Beech / Meikhtila, Burma, And Pattani, Thailand 
His face as still and serene as a statue’s, the Buddhist monk who has taken the title “the Burmese bin Laden” begins his sermon. Hundreds of worshippers sit before him, palms pressed together, sweat trickling down their sticky backs. On cue, the crowd chants with the man in burgundy robes, the mantras drifting through the sultry air of a temple in Mandalay, Burma’s second biggest city after Rangoon. It seems a peaceful scene, but Wirathu’s message crackles with hate. “Now is not the time for calm,” the monk intones, as he spends 90 minutes describing the many ways in which he detests the minority Muslims in this Buddhist-majority land. “Now is the time to rise up, to make your blood boil.”
Buddhist blood is boiling in Burma, also known as Myanmar–and plenty of Muslim blood is being spilled. Over the past year, Buddhist mobs have targeted members of the minority faith, and incendiary rhetoric from Wirathu–he goes by one name–and other hard-line monks is fanning the flames of religious chauvinism. Scores of Muslims have been killed, according to government statistics, although international human-rights workers put the number in the hundreds. Much of the violence is directed at the Rohingya, a largely stateless Muslim group in Burma’s far west that the U.N. calls one of the world’s most persecuted people. The communal bloodshed has spread to central Burma, where Wirathu, 46, lives and preaches his virulent sermons. The radical monk sees Muslims, who make up at least 5% of Burma’s estimated 60 million people, as a threat to the country and its culture. “[Muslims] are breeding so fast, and they are stealing our women, raping them,” he tells me. “They would like to occupy our country, but I won’t let them. We must keep Myanmar Buddhist.”
Such hate speech threatens the delicate political ecosystem in a country peopled by at least 135 ethnic groups that has only recently been unshackled from nearly half a century of military rule. Already some government officials are calling for implementation of a ban, rarely enforced during the military era, on Rohingya women’s bearing more than two children. And many Christians in the country’s north say recent fighting between the Burmese military and Kachin insurgents, who are mostly Christian, was exacerbated by the widening religious divide.
Radical Buddhism is thriving in other parts of Asia too. This year in Sri Lanka, Buddhist nationalist groups with links to high-ranking officialdom have gained prominence, with monks helping orchestrate the destruction of Muslim and Christian property. And in Thailand’s deep south, where a Muslim insurgency has claimed some 5,000 lives since 2004, the Thai army trains civilian militias and often accompanies Buddhist monks when they leave their temples. The commingling of soldiers and monks–some of whom have armed themselves–only heightens the alienation felt by Thailand’s minority Muslims.
Although each nation’s history dictates the course radical Buddhism has taken within its borders, growing access to the Internet means that prejudice and rumors are instantly inflamed with each Facebook post or tweet. Violence can easily spill across borders. In Malaysia, where hundreds of thousands of Burmese migrants work, several Buddhist Burmese were killed in June–likely in retribution, Malaysian authorities say, for the deaths of Muslims back in Burma.
In the reckoning of religious extremism–Hindu nationalists, Muslim militants, fundamentalist Christians, ultra-Orthodox Jews–Buddhism has largely escaped trial. To much of the world, it is synonymous with nonviolence and loving kindness, concepts propagated by Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, 2,500 years ago. But like adherents of any other religion, Buddhists and their holy men are not immune to politics and, on occasion, the lure of sectarian chauvinism. When Asia rose up against empire and oppression, Buddhist monks, with their moral command and plentiful numbers, led anticolonial movements. Some starved themselves for their cause, their sunken flesh and protruding ribs underlining their sacrifice for the laity. Perhaps most iconic is the image of Thich Quang Duc, a Vietnamese monk sitting in the lotus position, wrapped in flames, as he burned to death in Saigon while protesting the repressive South Vietnamese regime 50 years ago. In 2007, Buddhist monks led a foiled democratic uprising in Burma: images of columns of clerics bearing upturned alms bowls, marching peacefully in protest against the junta, earned sympathy around the world, if not from the soldiers who slaughtered them. But where does political activism end and political militancy begin? Every religion can be twisted into a destructive force poisoned by ideas that are antithetical to its foundations. Now it’s Buddhism’s turn.
Mantra of Hate
Sitting cross-legged on a raised platform at the New Masoeyein monastery in Mandalay, next to a wall covered by life-size portraits of himself, the Burmese bin Laden expounds on his worldview. U.S. President Barack Obama has “been tainted by black Muslim blood.” Arabs have hijacked the U.N., he believes, although he sees no irony in linking his name to that of an Arab terrorist. About 90% of Muslims in Burma are “radical, bad people,” says Wirathu, who was jailed for seven years for his role in inciting anti-Muslim pogroms in 2003. He now leads a movement called 969–the figure represents various attributes of the Buddha–which calls on Buddhists to fraternize only among themselves and shun people of other faiths. “Taking care of our own religion and race is more important than democracy,” says Wirathu.
It would be easy to dismiss Wirathu as an outlier with little doctrinal basis for his bigotry. But he is charismatic and powerful, and his message resonates. Among the country’s majority Bamar ethnic group, as well as across Buddhist parts of Asia, there’s a vague sense that their religion is under siege–that Islam, having centuries ago conquered the Buddhist lands of Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan and Afghanistan, now seeks new territory. Even without proof, Buddhist nationalists stoke fears that local Muslim populations are increasing faster than their own, and they worry about Middle Eastern money pouring in to build new mosques.
In Burma, the democratization process that began in 2011 with the junta’s giving way to a quasi-civilian government has also allowed extremist voices to proliferate. The trouble began last year in the far west, where machete-wielding Buddhist hordes attacked Rohingya villages; 70 Muslims were slaughtered in a daylong massacre in one hamlet, according to Human Rights Watch. The government has done little to check the violence, which has since migrated to other parts of the country. In late March, the central town of Meikhtila burned for days, with entire Muslim quarters razed by Buddhist mobs after a monk was killed by Muslims. (The official death toll: two Buddhists and at least 40 Muslims.) Thousands of Muslims are still crammed into refugee camps that journalists are forbidden to enter. In the shadow of a burned-down mosque, I was able to meet the family of Abdul Razak Shahban, one of at least 20 students at a local Islamic school who were killed. “My son was killed because he was Muslim, nothing else,” Razak’s mother Rahamabi told me.
Temple and State
In the deep south of Burma’s neighbor Thailand, it is the Buddhists who complain of being targeted for their faith. This part of the country used to be part of a Malay sultanate before staunchly Buddhist Thailand annexed it early last century, and Muslims make up at least 80% of the population. Since a separatist insurgency intensified in 2004, many Buddhists have been targeted because their positions–such as teachers, soldiers and government workers–are linked with the Thai state. Dozens of monks have been attacked too. Now the Buddhists have overwhelming superiority in arms: the Thai military and other security forces have moved into the wat, as Thai Buddhist temples are known.
If Buddhists feel more protected by the presence of soldiers in their temples, it sends quite another signal to the Muslim population. “[The] state is wedding religion to the military,” says Michael Jerryson, an assistant professor of religious studies at Youngstown State University in Ohio and author of a book about Buddhism’s role in the southern-Thailand conflict. Muslims too are scared: more of them have perished in the violence than Buddhists. (By proportion of population, more Buddhists have died, however.) Yet Buddhists are the ones who receive the greater state protection, and I listen to monk after monk heighten tensions by telling me that Muslims are using mosques to store weapons or that every imam carries a gun. “Islam is a religion of violence,” says Phratong Jiratamo, a former marine turned monk in the town of Pattani. “Everyone knows this.”
It’s a sentiment the Burmese bin Laden would endorse. I ask Wirathu how he reconciles the peaceful sutras of his faith with the anti-Muslim violence spreading across his Bamar-majority homeland. “In Buddhism, we are not allowed to go on the offensive,” he tells me, as if he is lecturing a child. “But we have every right to protect and defend our community.” Later, as he preaches to an evening crowd, I listen to him compel smiling housewives, students, teachers, grandmothers and others to repeat after him, “I will sacrifice myself for the Bamar race.” It’s hard to imagine that the Buddha would have approved.
- Time-
http://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/full-text-of-the-banned-time-story-the-face-of-buddhist-terror/

The Face Of Buddhist Terror: Sri Lanka To Ban Time Magazine

Filed under: Colombo Telegraph,Most Popular,News,Popular Stories,STORIES | 
http://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/the-face-of-buddhist-terror-sri-lanka-to-ban-time-magazine/

Ishrat case: Digvijaya links IB officer with L K Advani, Narendra Modi -- DK Singh

$
0
0

Ishrat case: Digvijaya links IB officer with L K Advani, Narendra Modi

D K Singh Posted online: Thu Jul 11 2013, 03:01 hrs

New Delhi : Congress general secretary Digvijaya Singh on Wednesday sought to embroil top brass of the opposition BJP, including L K Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Narendra Modi in the ongoing controversy about the alleged role of a senior Intelligence Bureau officer in the Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case.

“The CBI chargesheet mentions the involvement of (IB Special Director) Rajinder Kumar who had worked closely with Swaraj Kaushal (husband of Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj) and was posted at IB, Chandigarh, when Modi was general secretary in charge of Himachal Pradesh. When Advani was the Union Home Minister, he was appointed Joint Director, IB, Ahmedabad,” Singh told The Indian Express. Trying to find out if Ishrat was a terrorist: Shinde

Asked whether he was linking top BJP leaders with Kumar, he said, “I am not saying anything. I am only stating facts. Is it not a fact that Kumar was a close associate of Swaraj Kaushal when he was a Governor in the Northeast (in Mizoram)? Is it not a fact that under Advani, Kumar was posted in IB, Ahmedabad? Is it not a fact that G L Singhal (then ACP in Ahmedabad) has said in his statement to the CBI that Kumar was involved in helping the Gujarat Police in the fake encounter?”

The Congress leader’s veiled suggestions about Kumar’s links with BJP leaders came days after he had reportedly alleged that the whole idea of the Gujarat Police and Kumar working together was only to raise the pitch and leadership of the Gujarat Chief Minister “so that he becomes a hero in the mind of all people who believe that terrorism and acts of terror are only being done by the Muslims”. Singh later met Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde to demand clarification whether Ishrat Jahan had any links with terror outfit LeT.

“Only media has written that (26/11 terror attack accused) David Headley named Ishrat Jahan. This leak came only two days after Headley had been interrogated in the US. I feel very strongly the way media is being briefed by agencies like the CBI, IB and NIA, which is creating confusion in the minds of the people about fake encounter,” Singh said.
Asked about his allegation that the BJP was attempting to communalise politics in the run up to the Lok Sabha elections, he said, “The BJP and Sangh Parivar have been oscillating between their ideological stance marked by religious fundamentalism on the one side and, on the other side, Gandhian socialism, which was part of the BJP resolution in Gandhinagar in 1982. They have realised that it (Gandhian socialism) is not paying and therefore, they are going back to the other extreme and raising pitch of religious fundamentalism. And, in this, who would be best bet than Modi?”

http://www.indianexpress.com/story-print/1140385/

Buddhist monks protest at India temple bombing - videos

Subramanian Swamy seeks suspension of India-Abu Dhabi air services pact

$
0
0
Subramanian Swamy asks govt to suspend bilateral agreement with Abu Dhabi
MONEYLIFE DIGITAL TEAM | 11/07/2013 04:41 PM |  
The Janata Party president also urged the PM to impress upon his ministersto desist from becoming “advocates for the deal” that has no substantial or long-term economic benefit for India

Janata Party president Dr Subramanian Swamy has asked prime minister Manmohan Singh to suspend the bilateral agreement signed between India and Abu Dhabi. 

“From the timing of it (bilateral agreement) and from a close reading of the minute note of P Chidambaram (finance minister) after the meeting convened by him as directed by you appears prima facie to be linked to the Jet-Etihad deal,” Dr Swamy said in a letter sent to the PM.

Urging Dr Singh to impress upon union ministersto desist from becoming advocates (for Jet-Etihad deal), the Janata Party president said, this deal has no substantial or long-term economic benefit for India.

According to Dr Swamy, there are two reasons to suspend the bilateral agreement...
1. The Constitutional Bench judgment of the Supreme Court constituted on a reference made by the UPA government regarding the mode of allocation of natural resources such as spectrum, held that if it is for commercial exploitation, then auction is a preferred mode of allocation unless compelling reasons are adduced for the contrary view. In this case, India allocated without any substantive reason to prefer a bilateral agreement allotment of air space. But this is untenable since the opinion tendered by the Constitutional Bench to the union government earlier this year, the government is bound to allocate airspace to civil aviation on the basis of auction or to the highest bidder and not otherwise.

2. Second, the Standing Committee of Parliament's recommendation and the Inter-Ministerial Group (IMG) views cannot be disregard in a cavalier manner which is what the group of four ministers did in their meeting of 22 April 2013 convened on the directions from the PM. Hence their decision is arbitrary, unreasonable, illegal and malafide in over-ruling these powerful recommendations without adequate consultation. It will not stand in a challenge in the court.

The deal between Naresh Goyal-led Jet Airways and Etihad Airways, the national airline of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and the signing of the bilateral between India and Abu Dhabi comprises chain of events taking place one after another. The “smooth and automatic” flow of events makes one wonder whether these incidents were mere coincidence or part of collusion.

You may also want to read…





Subramanian Swamy seeks suspension of India-Abu Dhabi air services pact

Janata Party chief Subramanian Swamy today sought suspension of the new bilateral air services agreement between India and Abu Dhabi, saying prima facie it appeared to be linked with Jet-Etihad deal.
Janata Party chief Subramanian Swamy today sought suspension of the new bilateral air services agreement between India and Abu Dhabi, saying prima facie it appeared to be linked with Jet-Etihad deal.

NEW DELHI: Janata Party chief Subramanian Swamy today sought suspension of the new bilateral air services agreement between India and Abu Dhabi, saying prima facie it appeared to be linked with Jet-Etihad deal. 

The timing of the agreement and "from a close reading of the minuted note of (Finance Minister) P Chidambaram after the meeting convened by him as directed by you appears prima facie to be linked to the Jet-Etihad deal," he said in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, adding, "it is now time to formally suspend the said bilateral agreement." 

Referring to the Supreme Court verdict that auction was the preferred mode of allocation of natural resources like spectrum for commercial exploitation, Swamy said, "In this case, India allocated without any substantive reason to prefer a bilateral agreement allotment of airspace. 

"But this is untenable since the opinion tendered by the Constitutional Bench (of the apex court) to your government earlier this year, you are bound to allocate airspace to civil aviation on the basis of auction or to the highest bidder and not otherwise." 

He also said that the recommendation of Parliament's Standing Committee and the Inter-Ministerial Group "cannot be disregarded in a cavalier manner". 

Claiming that the decision of a Group of Ministers on the issue was "arbitrary, unreasonable, illegal and malafide", he said the decision would "not stand in a challenge in the court" and was "fraught with adverse national security implications and is likely to undermine India's domestic airlines industry". 

India and Abu Dhabi signed bilateral agreement in April increasing the seats by 36,000 per week to the Gulf nation over a period of three years, taking the total to 50,000. 

Modi does it TIME and again! -- BS Raghavan

$
0
0

Modi does it TIME and again!

B. S. RAGHAVAN

Chief Minister of Gujarat Narendra Modi has yet again hit the cover of the TIMEmagazine which has given him a thumping write-up. Remember, the magazine enjoys a readership of 25 million and to make it to its cover is no mean feat.
Under the title, “Modi means business — But can he lead India”, it extols the achievements of Modi in such glowing terms as to make any Indian reader and wonder whether it is really all about a State or a politician in his own country. It talks about the State’s phenomenal success story in all-round development, its emergence as the auto-hub of India with an expected capacity of 700,000 cars in 2014, the 24-hour uninterrupted power supply guaranteed to both business enterprises and farmers in the field, and a streamlined and efficient bureaucracy.
What the run-of-the-mill political bigwigs would find most galling is about the State being free from corruption and about the family of Modi being not at all visible.
The TIME’s comment that Modi “does not put his faith on public display” and that, but for a picture of Swami Vivekananda, he has no religious icons in his office, must be a revelation not only to ‘secularists’ for whom Modi is the whipping boy but to the general public as well. The commentary does not even once make any reference to the 2002 post-Godhra disturbances.

INCREDIBLE

Its punch line is: “…When others think of someone who can bring India out of the mire of chronic corruption and inefficiency, (and) of a firm, no-nonsense leader who will set the nation on a course of development that might finally put it on par with China, they think of Modi.” This is incredible tribute by any standards. There is no point in being churlish or petty in reacting to the praises repeatedly heaped on him, not only by TIME, but also by some other publications of international repute. They stand out all the more prominently in the light of the fact that no other Chief Minister has been considered worthy of such recognition.
They can only come out of some deeply felt compelling urge to write about him. Otherwise, there is no reason why when there is so much happening in the entire world and so many other issues are there to be taken note of, these magazines should focus so much on the leader of a State in India, and give him so much space so often.
This gives a measure of the extent of the awe and admiration inspired by Modi.
There is no doubt that all other political leaders, particularly those outside the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), or, perhaps, even including them, will find this most discomfiting! Their discomfiture must be all the more acute for the simple reason that it is impossible to dismiss these laudatory articles as politically motivated or stemming from a saffron mindset.

UNDISPUTED ABILITY

They are by analysts and observers who have no political axe to grind vis-à-vis Narendra Modi nor anything to gain by propping him up. They are by persons with a deep comparative grasp of world affairs and political personalities whose critical faculties are sharp and who are not afraid of calling a spade a spade.
So, they would not have built up Modi in such an eloquent and effusive manner without going deeply into every relevant factor relating to his performance and without cross-checking it with different sections of the opinion from grass roots to the top echelons of officialdom.
The question must still be asked: Where does Modi go from here? It is indubitable that, TIME or noTIME, he is, on all accounts, the most dynamic and effective public functionary today. It must be borne in mind at the same time that he is home-brewed and rough-hewn and has so far shone on his home ground where he knew his way about and the ambience was favourable for pulling off the Modi magic.
The complexities, chicaneries and machinations of national politics are quite something else. Maybe, if he were to lead a Government composed of the BJP with an absolute majority in the Lok Sabha, he will be able to live up to the reputation he made in Gujarat.
But if it were a coalition in which he is liable to be pulled hard in different directions by its ruthless and rapacious constituents, the prospect is not that clear. Even so, I hope that in the coming elections, the people will opt for a change from the present effete dispensation, and Modi will get a chance to show his mettle.
(This article was published on July 11, 2013)

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/b-s-raghavan/modi-does-it-time-and-again/article4905448.ece#.Ud9XYLvap8k.gmail

Lost SC berth for opposing HC judgeship for CJI Kabir's sister: Guj CJ

$
0
0
Bhaskar Bhattacharya

Lost SC berth for opposing HC judgeship for CJI Kabir's sister: Guj CJ

Maneesh Chhibber Posted online: Fri Jul 12 2013, 03:19 hrs
New Delhi : Gujarat High Court Chief Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya has complained that Chief Justice of India Altamas Kabir — who retires on July 18 — blocked his elevation to the Supreme Court earlier this year because, as a member of the collegium of the Calcutta High Court, he had opposed the appointment of CJI Kabir’s lawyer sister to the Bench, a decision he said was tantamount to “rape” of the court.

On September 13, 2010, the CJI’s sister, Shukla Kabir Sinha, was appointed to the bench of the Calcutta HC after the HC collegium ignored Justice Bhattacharya’s written submission on why she should not be appointed to the post.
CJI Kabir — then a senior judge of the apex court — was a member of the SC collegium that considered the HC’s recommendation. However, sources said he had recused himself from the meeting.

On March 19 this year, after being overlooked for elevation to the Supreme Court by a collegium headed by CJI Kabir, Chief Justice Bhattacharya, who was the third seniormost High Court Chief Justice at the time, sent a 10-page letter to the President of India, Prime Minister and the Chief Justice of India.

Two other High Court CJs — Bombay High Court CJ Mohit S Shah and Uttarakhand High Court CJ Barin Ghosh — too were overlooked for elevation.

In his letter to the CJI, accessed by The Indian Express, Chief Justice Bhattacharya wrote: “As a human being, I have a reasonable basis to apprehend that the fact that as a member of the collegium while I was a judge of the Calcutta HC, I raised serious objections against the elevation of Smt Shukla Kabir Sinha, your (CJI Altamas Kabir’s) younger sister, is the real reason for making such observations against me.”

When contacted, the Prime Minister’s spokesperson said: “The letter was addressed to the Chief Justice of India, and the PMO had no role to play in it as appointments of judges are decided by the collegium.”

Justice Bhattacharya has asked that his letter be shown to all members of the collegium. He has also requested that he be shown “the material which led you (CJI Kabir) to take such a decision regarding my competence and character”. He has said that he will resign if he is given “justifiable reasons”.

Neither CJI Kabir nor Justice Bhattacharya could be reached for a comment. Questionnaires emailed to their offices elicited no response. Justice Shukla Kabir Sinha was not available for a comment. Law Minister Kapil Sibal declined to comment.

While rejecting the claim of the three seniormost CJs, the collegium had said that they were “not suitable to hold the office of Supreme Court judge and their elevation as such would prove to be counter-productive and not conducive to administration of justice,” according to a Hindustan Times report which Justice Bhattacharya has quoted in his letter.
Justice Bhattacharya has also given his reasons for opposing the CJI’s sister’s name for judgeship, including what he has called her poor practice, reflected in her annual income-tax statements.

“In my view as an advocate who at the age of 58 years is just capable of earning a net amount of Rs 88,000 from practice should in no case be recommended for judgeship. We cannot lose sight of the fact that a High Court chaprasi gets more than Rs 13,000 per month as salary which is equivalent to Rs 1,56,000 per annum which is almost double the income of Mrs Shukla Kabir Sinha from her practice as a lawyer,” he wrote in his note for the collegium, extracts from which are part of his letter to the CJI.

The letter also says that he had raised the issue of the CJI’s sister taking “four years for passing BA examination after clearing senior Cambridge and five years for getting MA degree after graduation, although the usual time taken for clearing these examinations is three years and two years respectively”.

“I don’t have a personal inimical feeling against Mrs Sinha who is just like my sister... However, as I treat the HC to which I belong for the full time-being as my mother, I earnestly believed that to elevate Mrs Sinha at the age of 59, there is no instance in the past of elevation of a Judge from the Bar at the age of 59 years... would give a wrong signal and people would lose faith in the judiciary and the collegium system... For the above reasons, I made my observations which, however, didn’t get the approval of the Chief Justice of the Calcutta HC and of Judge Pinaki Chandra Ghose, who was the other member of the collegium and who has superseded me this time,” the letter reads. “So far as I can remember, Justice Pinaki Ghose in his recommendation observed that if Shukla Kabir is elevated as a judge, she would be an asset to the judiciary.”

Justice Bhattacharya has also written, “When time came for selection of Smt Shukla Kabir Sinha as a Judge of the HC, I was pressured to agree to such a proposal as a member of the collegium, but I thought it would amount to committing rape of the Calcutta HC, which was like my mother and if I didn’t raise any objections that would amount to closing my eyes while my mother was being raped. As a result, I used rather strong words so that by looking at the nature of words used by me, the person responsible for sending such a recommendation would have a second thought... Unfortunately, I was unsuccessful in resisting the rape of my mother in spite of my earnest endeavour. However, at the time of my death, I will not repent that I ever compromised with wrong for the sake of my career.”


‘Another incident’
* Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya also referred to “another recent incident” that he says could have made the collegium reject him.
* According to Justice Bhattacharya, a former Gujarat HC Chief Justice who is now in the Supreme Court withdrew an excess amount of Rs 54,650 as TA/DA which is not permissible without furnishing proof.
* “There are several other honourable judges who had withdrawn similar amounts in excess of the rules. After receiving such clarification from the Centre, I, as the chief justice of the Gujarat HC, placed the matter in the Standing Committee of seven judges and they unanimously resolved that the honourable judges... should pay back the excess amount,” his letter reads.
* As per the letter, when the judge, who is now in the Supreme Court, was requested to repay the excess amount, his office wrote to the HC registrar telling him “not to make any such unnecessary and unwarranted correspondence.”
* “As your younger brother, I seek advice from you as to what should be my duty as the present CJ if I find that a former Chief Justice of the High Court who is now judge of the SC is found to have withdrawn excess amount not intentionally but due to some ambiguity in existing rules?” the CJ asks the CJI.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/gujarat-cj-says-he-lost-sc-berth-because-he-opposed-hc-judgeship-for-cji-kabirs-sister/1140897/

Pakistan's Secret Double Cross on Terrorism: A BBC Documentary

$
0
0

Pakistan's Secret Double Cross on Terrorism: A BBC Documentary

Filmed largely in Pakistan and Afghanistan, this BBC film shockingly documents explores how our supposed ally Pakistan stands accused by top CIA officers and Western diplomats of causing the deaths of thousands of coalition soldiers in Afghanistan by secretly helping the Taliban. 
Uploaded on Nov 20, 2011
ShankhNaad Team Facebook Page:
http://www.facebook.com/user/TheShank...
****************************************­************************************
Secret Pakistan BBC - Double Cross : This first episode investigates duplicity that emerged after 9/11 and disturbing intelligence reports after Britain's forces entered Helmand in 2006.

In May this year, US Special Forces shot and killed Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan. Publicly Pakistan is one of America's closest allies - yet every step of the operation was kept secret from it.

Filmed largely in Pakistan and Afghanistan, this two-part documentary series explores how a supposed ally stands accused by top CIA officers and Western diplomats of causing the deaths of thousands of coalition soldiers in Afghanistan.

The documentary makers meet serving Taliban commanders who describe the support they get from Pakistan in terms of weapons, training and a place to hide.

Category: Pakistan BBC "John Part" Double Secret Chaos Bush Theory News Taste Cell Triple Mission Team Fox Spy Splinter Secrets "Arvo Pärt" "Splinter Cell" Secrecy Action Cia Abc Stem George Feature Fbi Rev Vision Hidden Secret Pakistan BBC United Kingdom United States America Afghanistan NATO England Europe Germany Conviction Canada Russia Australia China Nations Spain Japan World European Brazil Asia India Africa Britain Mexico London Sweden International Islam Terrorism Jihad Muslim
****************************************­************************************
कश्मीर का दिल दहला देने वाले सच को जानने के लिए यह विडियो देखे.. यह बात भारत की भ्रस्त मीडिया ने लोगो को कभी भी नहीं बताई है.. इस विडियो को देखे और अपने मित्रो के साथ शेयर करे:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqSqn0...

Viewing all 11099 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>