Quantcast
Channel: Bharatkalyan97
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 11129

J. Bhagawati, Krishna Pravin and Arvind Panagariya refute fulminations by the tabloid Economist against Narendra Modi

$
0
0

On Narendra Modi, religion, Brexit, YouTube, monarchiesLetters to the editor

A hard-hitting response to the editorial by the Economist vilifying PM by J. Bhagwati, and me. We conclude by telling the Economist that with this editorial it has descended into the post truth world.
A selection of correspondence
Letters are welcome and should be addressed to the Editor at letters@economist.com
Your latest fulminations against Narendra Modi (“Agent Orange”, May 4th) follow a line of attack at The Economist based on innuendo and indefensible criticisms. Thus, you fault India’s prime minister for his handling of the dastardly Pulwama attack, masterminded by Pakistani terrorists, but neglect to tell the reader that his actions received unqualified approval from all Western democracies. You claim demonetisation caused “huge disruption” to farmers and small businesses, but cite no data or surveys substantiating it. In fact, a study co-authored by Gita Gopinath, the director of research at the imf and a critic of demonetisation, finds that the effects dissipated within a few months and the growth rate during the year of demonetisation fell by no more than 0.5% on account of the measure.

Finally, in a delicious irony, you accuse Mr Modi of “controlling and bullying critics”, while basing your entire tirade against him on the commentaries by those same critics. It appears your magazine, too, has completed its descent into the post-truth world.

https://www.economist.com/letters/2019/05/18/letters-to-the-editor

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 11129

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>