LETTER TOMembers and Alumnae of American Universities
Members and Alumnae of American Universities
Oppose Prejudice and Fear-mongering in the “Faculty Statement on Narendra Modi’s Visit”
Note: This is a counter petition against the anti-Modi statement given by some faculty of South Asian studies recently. When you sign it, please indicate in the optional comment box which university or universities you are an alum of or you presently work in.
We, the undersigned, are professors, researchers, scientists, scholars, students, and professionals with undergraduate, graduate or doctoral degrees from universities across North America. We are members, partners, or products of a world-class higher education system and many of us are successful leaders of today’s global knowledge economy. We are well aware of the principles of scholarly research, scientific method, and objectivity, and we are also aware of the need to respect a wide range of opinions in academia, especially in fields like the humanities and liberal arts.
However, there are occasions when academic opinion strays so far from the scope of sane discourse, and worse, creates the risk of devastating human consequences in political and economic terms, that any one who has seen the insides of a university classroom and respects its worth, must step up and speak up to protect its integrity. The recent statement against Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Silicon Valley by some faculty members who claim expertise on South Asia, is such an occasion. This statement lacks the slightest respect for facts and for academic integrity, and presumes to claim unilateral expertise over India by brandishing credentials in lieu of persuasive arguments.
We reject its claims for the following reasons, and we call strongly for introspection and change in the ossified and fantastic little mental world of South Asia studies as it exists today.
1) The allegation that Narendra Modi ought to be viewed with suspicion, if not disdain, by business leaders in Silicon Valley because of surveillance implications in the Digital India initiative seems a desperate ploy rather than any genuine concern for India. They offer no evidence for their claim, and neglect to mention that the Indian government has been pursuing several digital initiatives long before Narendra Modi assumed office, a fact that never bothered them when the UPA government, with which several U.S. based South Asian academics have had close ties of patronage and privilege, was in power.
2) Their attempt to invoke an admitted mistake on the part of the U.S government in denying Modi a visa as a “powerful signal” is a stark case of false reasoning (would the incident of a false complaint being made in a police station still be mentioned as evidence of complicity when due process had found there was no cause for even an arrest, let alone a trial and conviction?) and a deplorable attempt to exhume ugly lies about Modi’s attitude towards Muslims. Modi was cleared by several investigating agencies of any complicity in the riots that broke out in Gujarat in 2002 following the burning of a train carrying Hindu pilgrims by a Muslim mob. He ran an inclusive campaign for Prime Minister and was vindicated by one of the largest mandates received by an elected official on the face of the earth. He has shown no sign at all that he disfavors someone because they happen to call God by a different name than he does. His recent visit to U.A.E. where he was received warmly by senior members of the government (who happen to be devout and proud Muslims) should be a reminder to academicians who somehow think they are protecting Islam better than Muslims themselves, many of whom have voted for Modi enthusiastically. The powerful endorsement Modi has received from two of the major institutions that govern civilized modern societies, law and democracy, should be proof enough of the inappropriateness of the allegations that have been relentlessly leveled against him by a section of academia and the press--and unless the South Asia studies faculty who have perpetuated these charges so recklessly have new evidence that they can present before courts in India and before the Indian people, they must recognize that they are running a campaign not for justice but for destroying justice and democracy.
3) Their allegations that somehow academic freedom is under threat in India because of administrative changes at a couple of institutions are completely belied by the reality of what Indian citizens see in their news media every day. TV anchors, writers, journalists, columnists, and bloggers not only criticize Modi and his government, but often go so far as to promote baseless and sensational charges only to retract them quietly later. There is growing evidence of a systematic process of defamation against India and Narendra Modi in the international press and in a large part of the elite English-language Indian media. No government that seeks to restrict freedom of speech would permit the amount of calumny that passes off as news in India.
4) On the contrary, for all their talk about assaults on academic freedom, the signatories of the anti-Modi letter have never admitted that the subject of the greatest censorship and distortion in South Asian academics in recent years has been Narendra Modi. Just a few years ago, Modi was effectively prevented from addressing by videoconference students and faculty at UPenn because of a campaign of calumny similar to the present one. It is an unspoken about reality that the academic pseudo-consensus on South Asia, with its demonization campaign of Modi at the center, sustains itself entirely on a system of exclusion, censure and silencing. The only effective (if invisible) restrictions on free speech and academic freedom that exist today are the ones that silence those scholars, writers and concerned citizens who have dared to question the South Asianist academy’s institutionalized Hinduphobia and disdain for facts. Invited submissions to books on secularism are suddenly rejected for questioning this academic pseudo-consensus, peer reviews are deployed strategically to deny publication, scholars of integrity and depth are misrepresented egregiously in articles seeking to demonize them as fundamentalists, letters of response are declined the courtesy of publication, exaggerated charges of plagiarism are made against independent scholars, and worse. It is a sorry state of affairs indeed that an area of scholarship which purports to represent the lives, struggles and aspirations of over one billion people in academia has descended into such a murky and incestuous miasma of meaningless, dishonest and self-righteous posturing.
We therefore reject the faculty statement against Modi in its entirety. We do so not necessarily in the name of any one person or political party, but in the name of the high standards of academic excellence we have worked towards building, in and outside of academia. We call on the authors of this petition to introspect, change, and for once seek to earn the trust and respect of the community in whose name they have been making a living all these years.
ANNANT SRIVASTAVA HOUSTON, TXabout 10 hours ago Like 0
I m signing because I fear the growth of my country has been hampered by these pseudo intellectuals.
Kris Rao SILVER SPRING, MDabout 10 hours ago Like 0
Those so called academics do not have any idea how lies were spread by some politicians and governments for their self interest. These people have only tunnel vision and has no intention of looking beyond their tunnel.
Mrudula Gandhi BOYNTON BEACH, FLabout 10 hours ago Like 0
The PM Modi ji is a great leader of the free world and the largest democracy. He represents over a Billion Hindus and Indians. He is visionary, bold, brave, compassionate, articulate and most trusted India ever had since India received freedom from the British Raj. These bully professors should be ashamed of themselves. Some are Muslims, Christians, and Pheusdo secular Hindus. I want every India in America to sign the petition and send a strong message that we the Hindus and Indians are not backing down to anyone in the world.
GO NAMO GO.
Ramesh Shah HOSTON, TXabout 10 hours ago Like 0
Truth Always Prevails. Narendra Modi ji was not responsible for 2002 riots, he helped to control it successfully. It was Muslim Mob at Godhar Station who are responsible burning a Train compartment and creating Riots.
Malini Iyer VIENNA, VAabout 10 hours ago Like 0
I am signing because of Modi is democratically elected leader of the largest democracy in the world.
Amit Sharma HAMILTON, NEW ZEALANDabout 10 hours ago Like 0
I can see the usual suspect in previous petition against Mr. Modi who work on one single agenda of unstable and poor India, so that their business of selling poverty and mediocrity remain relevant and thriving. I am signing this petition to answer those neo-obstructionists that Indians have come to an age where we will call those mischief mongers out to keep India's story of reform and progress under Modi 'Nis-kantak".
apurba bhattacharjee SILVER SPRING, MDabout 10 hours ago Like 0
I'm an Adjunct Professor at the Georgetown University, Washington DC. I fully support the petition because I believe Modi can truly turn around the fate of India. The opposition groups clearly have their vested interests against the development of India.
ritesh seal PEARLAND, TXabout 10 hours ago Like 0
studies in University of Pittsburgh and MIT Sloan
Michael Mclean Bender MIAMI, FLabout 10 hours ago Like 0
I love India. A vibrant and ancient culture with a leader who has a clear vision to better their future. A free, democratic country whose friendship and cooperation with the US is in our best interests, diplomatically, strategically and practically
Madhurima Chatterjee SUNNYVALE, CAabout 10 hours ago Like 0
As a US taxpayer I object to these safely tenured faculty indulging in baseless propaganda to further their vested interests at the expense of democracy and accountability
Narsing a WEST SPRINGFIELD, MAabout 10 hours ago Like 0
Southern Illinois University
Yvette Rosser MONTGOMERY, TXabout 10 hours ago Like 0
I have studied the phenomenon of Hinduphobia in Academia for 20 years. Many of the same names found here are also on endless petitions and a two-decade ongoing barrage of unsubstantiated critiques. Enough is enough! I urge these puffed up scholars of South Asian Studies to get off their high horses and get acquainted with the real India, as it is today, on the ground. Not in your post-colonial, peer reviewed anthologies.
Achalesh Amar PEARLAND, TXabout 10 hours ago Like 0
These "pseudo intellectuals" have done a great harm to the growth of the country. By signing this, I would urge them to introspect and see how they can contribute positively
Prashant Agarwal CROYDON, UNITED KINGDOMabout 10 hours ago Like 0
Honourable Prime Minister of India Shri Narendra Modi ji is the epitome of integrity and honesty. His statecraft and leadership skills is second to none. I strongly condemn politically motivated and grossly biased views expressed by few so called and self proclaimed "intellectuals" in America. My advice to these people are, to work hard and earn money rather than getting some illegally siphoned money for making such sick statements.
Chandra Sivaguharaman PLANO, TXabout 10 hours ago Like 0
Nova Southeastern University, FL
Manjunath Raju SAN DIEGO, CAabout 10 hours ago Like 0
San diego State University
Aloke Kumar EDMONTON, CANADAabout 10 hours ago Like 0
I am academic and I would like the world to know Sen and co-conspirators are not representative of the view of the academics.
Sumeet Roy INDIAabout 10 hours ago Like 0
Modi is a true nationalist.
Anand Sharma PEARLAND, TXabout 10 hours ago Like 0
This faculty statement is so ridiculously far off the reality that it brings great injustice not only to India and Modi Ji but also to my beloved adopted country USA. This statement should be condemned in strongest terms.
Sompa Guha Roy THANE, INDIAabout 10 hours ago Like 0
I trust Modi
Ranjit Ballal ULLESTHORPE, UNITED KINGDOMabout 10 hours ago Like 0
Modi stands for development of India. The people who oppose him also oppose the mandate given to him by the Indian people. Propaganda against him is carried out by vested interest who are happy think that their personal political interest are above the good of India.
Mohan Gupta CANADA, CANADAabout 10 hours ago Like 0
People who oppose Modi's visit are traitors of Bhaarat and Hindus and have sold their souls for monetary GAINS
Sumalatha Elliadka SUNNYVALE, CAabout 10 hours ago Like 0
I'm an alumni of San Jose State University and I work at Proofpoint Inc
ragini Sharma WASHAGO, CANADAabout 11 hours ago Like 0
Wendy Doniger and Sheldon Pollock have created academic cartel to insulate work from crticism. Shameful attack on Modi.
Narayan Swamy JOHNS CREEK, GAabout 11 hours ago Like 0
It is deplorable that as a community we have to pay heed to these academics who are low on the totem pole of influence and happen to have a job because of subversive funding sources and unsuspecting parents who cough up their tuition fees to support these guys cacophony. We need to shun these schools, endowments and media that give them coverage..Let the rational and capable people speak up.
Sushil Chachra WESTBURY, NYabout 11 hours ago Like 0
All the allegations against Honorable Shree Modiji are absolutely false.
Parveen Chandra RIVERVIEW, FLabout 11 hours ago Like 0
Modi is wrongly targeted with lies and misunderstandings. Muslims progressed the most in his state . Actually some politicians are using minorities to settle political scores.
kaushalendra jadon BALTIMORE USA, MDabout 11 hours ago Like 0
Hi is a good person, good leader and overall a good visionary who thing about country, not about himself. Hi is doing great thing for country, may be it's invisible in short term but it will defiantly come in effect in longer run.There is nothing new in it that some of them opposing MODI, it's usual. Now it's my decision that which side i prefer to go. I side Modi way.
Rahul Banerji REDLANDS, CAabout 11 hours ago Like 0
I am signing because after years of oblivion, India has produced a popular prime minister who will not toe the western agenda of running India like a vassal state. He has not been educated outside India, nor has he ever visited any foreign country in his formative years. In sum and substance, western governments do not have anything on him unlike his predecessors including their teams who have been blackmailed these last 70 odd years and are extremely upset with his individualistic and single minded zeal to make India a great nation! I believe his challenges are many and erected daily with a missionary zeal by forces inimical to India but nothing that is insurmountable if he has God and nation behind him!
Sumit Ghosh INDIAabout 11 hours ago Like 0
This is a horrible attempt by the left to stop Modi,to make investment in India.They ruined India completely for this many years,and now they donot want people to work.Theur only ambition is to stop Modi,and nothing else.
Nisarg Bhatt JERSEY CITY, NJabout 11 hours ago Like 0
Modi is a great leader
kishan gupta GATES MILLS, OHabout 11 hours ago Like 0
Shri Modi is leading India on right path.
He is honest politician who has given his life to the nation.
Bala Balaguru MONMOUTH JUNCTION, NJabout 11 hours ago Like 0
Time to let the world know that Nare8 Modi has always stood up for protecting the rights of all and progress of all. If he had chosen to, he too could have come to the US and become an academic drawing Fat salaries and producing little for what they earn (take). Instead he chose to work on the ground.
Bijender Tanwar EDISON, NJabout 11 hours ago Like 0
Oppose these leftist n bias educational so called professor, who they are ?
KIRIT VAIDYA LAKE MARY, FLabout 11 hours ago Like 0
I DO NOT AGREE WITH FACULTY MANISEATO