Quantcast
Channel: Bharatkalyan97
Viewing all 11039 articles
Browse latest View live

Chinese troops enter Ladakh again, pick up 5 Indians

$
0
0

Chinese troops enter Ladakh again, pick up 5 Indians

  | New Delhi, December 15, 2013 | 19:30
Chinese troops apprehended five Indian nationals in Chumar area of Ladakh well inside the Indian territory and took them to their side of the border, in perhaps the first such incident along the Line of Actual Control.

The five people were handed over to Indian side by the People's Liberation Army troops after efforts were in this regard under the existing border mechanisms between the two countries, said sources.
File photo of Chinese intrusion across the LAC in Ladakh


The five Indian nationals along with their cattle were apprehended by the PLA troops around few kms inside the Indian territory in Chumar area and were taken to their camp across the LAC in an apparent bid to stake their claim on the area, they said.
(Sept 5, 2013Chinese Army has occupied 640 square km in three Ladakh sectors, says report )

The Army Headquarters sought to play down the incident saying that the matter was resolved "amicably" but sources said the Chinese side relented only after the local Indian Army authorities sought a flag meeting on the matter and warned that the the issue would be raised at a higher level.

It is learnt that the local Army authorities on both sides established communication on the issue, they said.


The incident has come after Prime Minister Manmohan Singh signed the Border Defence Cooperation Agreement with China in October seeking to prevent any flare ups between the armies of the two countries on the LAC.
(July 21, 2013: 50 Chinese soldiers intrude Chumar in Ladakh, yet again )

Defence Minister AK Antony had recently warned that the new border pact does not guarantee that nothing will happen in these areas in future.

Chumar has been one of the most active areas on the LAC in terms of transgressions by the Chinese troops.
(What is going on in Chumar? India to redeploy surveillance in sector )
Located 300km from Leh, it has always been an area of discomfort for the Chinese troops as this is the only place along the China-India border where they do not have any direct access to the LAC.
 
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/chinese-troops-enter-ladakh-again-pick-up-5-indians/1/331389.html

Gay sex verdict: Rajnath Singh backs SC, says BJP cannot justify unnatural acts

$
0
0

Gay sex verdict: Rajnath Singh backs SC, says BJP cannot justify unnatural acts

Ravish Tiwari Posted online: Sun Dec 15 2013, 01:51 hrs

New Delhi : Ending the BJP’s silence over the Supreme Court’s much-criticised verdict to once again criminalise gay sex, party president Rajnath Singh Saturday said the BJP was with the apex court on this as it could not justify “unnatural acts”.

“We usually honour Supreme Court judgments. How can anyone justify unnatural acts?” Singh told The Sunday Express when asked about the BJP position on this widely debated issue.

Although Singh did not speak at length on the subject, his comment is the first to clearly indicate the party’s position since the SC ruling.

The BJP’s leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha, Sushma Swaraj, had sidestepped the issue saying the party would outline its position only after seeing the government’s response to the SC suggestion that Parliament could change the law governing gay sex.

She had also suggested the government convene an all-party meeting to build consensus before changing the law.

The BJP has not discussed the SC ruling internally and Rajnath’s public support to the apex court is expected to spur a debate in the party.

An influential section in the BJP had indicated that the party may not be averse to amending Section 377 of the IPC to legalise gay sex provided the government took the initiative.

But with Rajnath backing the SC, the party would have to stand by him as the party president’s view is the party’s position, BJP leaders said
.
http://www.indianexpress.com/story-print/1207820/

Harvard Buildings Evacuated Over Explosives Report

$
0
0
December 16, 2013

Harvard Buildings Evacuated Over Explosives Report


CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — Four buildings on Harvard University's campus near Boston were evacuated Monday after the school's police department received an unconfirmed report that explosives may have been placed inside.
Final exams have begun at the Ivy League school in Cambridge, and many of the students who had to leave went to Annenberg Hall, another campus building, according to the school's paper, The Harvard Crimson. Three of the evacuated buildings border Harvard Yard and the other is the school's science center.
Both school and city police were investigating and the university will provide more information soon, it said in alerts on its emergency page and its Twitter account.
"Out of an abundance of caution, the buildings have been evacuated while the report is investigated," the school said in a statement. "Harvard's focus is on the safety of our students, faculty and staff."
Sophomore Santiago Pardo said by phone that he and his roommate were keeping close tabs on the situation from their dorm, Adams House, which is not near Harvard Yard.
"We feel safe," he said. "We're not scared."
Last month, another Ivy League school, Yale University in Connecticut, was locked down for nearly six hours while authorities investigated a phone call saying an armed man was heading to shoot it up, a warning they later said was likely a hoax.
And in February, someone called in a hoax about a gunman on the campus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, another elite school about two miles from Harvard. The university said the gunman was a staff member looking for revenge after the suicide of an Internet activist accused of illegally using MIT computers.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2013/12/16/us/ap-us-harvard-building-evacuations.html?hp

HC rejects IIT’s plea against Subramanian Swamy

$
0
0
by Dec 18, 2013
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court Tuesday rejected IIT, Delhi's plea to dismiss Subramanian Swamy's civil suit claiming that the institute owes him more than Rs 70 lakhs for the services he rendered during his tenure there as an Assistant Professor between 1972 and 1991.

Justice Manmohan Singh dismissed the plea after both IIT and Swamy failed to settle the issue out of court.

The Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, (IIT-D) had approached high court against a city court's order agreeing to hear Swamy's plea seeking recovery of the alleged dues of Rs 19 lakh along with interest of 18 percent from February 1991.
]Subramanian Swamy. ReutersSubramanian Swamy. Reuters
In its plea, the petitioner took the ground that his plea was time-barred and beyond the jurisdiction of the court.

The lower court had on February 26, 2012 agreed to hear Swamy's plea and dismissed IIT's application seeking dismissal of his civil suit on the ground that it was time-barred and beyond the jurisdiction of the court.

According to IIT, Swamy's total claim, including interest, would come to Rs 70.20 lakh which is beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of the lower court.

Swamy had filed the suit in the lower court to recover salary and allowances in revised grade from December 12, 1972 till May 21, 1991 along with interest at 18 percent with effect from February 20, 1991 till the date of payment and gratuity, pension.

Opposing Swamy's civil suit, IIT had said his claim for alleged dues was rejected by it as he had failed to provide the details of the amount earned from his employment between December 11, 1972 to March 27, 1991.

Swamy had said he came to know about his dues only in 2009 after filing RTI applications which showed the Director had "falsely" presented the case for his dues before the Board of Governors. .

PTI
http://www.firstpost.com/india/hc-rejects-iits-plea-against-subramanian-swamy-1292533.html

Strip-search finds India's spine. A brilliant headline which Pres. Obama should read.

$
0
0

Devyani case: Strip-search finds India's spine


Devyani case: Strip-search finds India's spine
File photo of India's deputy consul general in New York Devyani Khobragade, who was arrested by law enforcement authorities on visa fraud charges in the US.
NEW DELHI: L'affaire Devyani Khobragade has escalated into a full-blown diplomatic spat between India and the US. Stung by the humiliating treatment meted out to India's deputy consul general in New York, New Delhi on Tuesday upped the ante by taking a series of steps including withdrawal of certain privileges from American diplomats, removing barricades around the US embassy and seeking information on wages paid to Indians employed by the US embassy and the American School.

As political parties, cutting across party lines, condemned the US action, New Delhi unveiled a series of retaliatory actions which showed a rare hardened attitude towards the US. This was in sharp contrast to its weak-kneed response to previous slights by the US, the latest being the response to phone tapping by the Americans of the Indian mission in Washington.

On Tuesday, India demanded an unconditional apology for the humiliation of its diplomat, who was strip-searched, handcuffed, had her DNA swab taken and was bunged in a lock-up with drug addicts and common criminals. Foreign minister Salman Khurshid described the US action as completely unacceptable. "We have put in motion what we believe would be an effective way of addressing the issue but also (put) in motion such steps that need to be taken to protect her dignity," he told reporters here.

The identity cards of all US officials serving in the Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai and Hyderabad consulates have been withdrawn, which means they will become ordinary foreign nationals rather than those with diplomatic status. Indian officials in consulates in the US are not given such ID cards, which can be used to claim immunity from the police. Special airport passes for American diplomats have also been withdrawn. Aviation authorities have been told to ensure that US embassy vehicles do not get any priority treatment at reserved parking lots at airports across the country.



The most demonstrative action was removal of barricades from the road that runs behind the US embassy here. Bulldozers arrived on Tuesday afternoon to push away concrete barricades from the road which serves as the entry for visa seekers and had been closed to all traffic. The reason cited for this was denial of designated parking space for the Indian embassy in Washington in January this year.

'We're going to insist on strict reciprocity'

The Indian government has asked for details of family members of US officials in India, their bank accounts and whether they are employed in any capacity. Indian officials' spouses or family members in Washington have to seek special permission from the state department if they want to work outside. The government has also asked for salary and bank account details of all Indians working for the US embassy and its consulates across India, including teachers and staff employed in the American Embassy School. They want to demonstrate that unequal pay is a part of the US' own practices.

"We are going to insist on strict reciprocity," said foreign ministry officials. India has also withdrawn tax exemption facility for US diplomats to import and export items. This facility has been frequently misused by many members of the diplomatic corps of all countries. However, India has argued that since Indians don't get the same facilities in the US, there was no reason for US diplomats to enjoy the same facility in India.

Khobragade's humiliation has angered the IFS community which has asked for protection of their dignity from overzealous foreign governments. This possibly prodded the government and Salman Khurshid, who came under some criticism from other parts of the government for meeting a visiting US congressional delegation on Monday, to take up a much more aggressive stance against the US on Tuesday.

The other meetings sought by the US team were cancelled as Rahul Gandhi, Sushilkumar Shinde and Narendra Modi refused to meet it. The delegation included Congressmen George Holding (Republican, North Carolina), Pete Olson (Republican, Texas) David Schweikert (Republican, Arizona), Robert Woodall (Republican, Georgia), and Madeleine Bordallo (Democrat, Guam).

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Devyani-case-Strip-search-finds-Indias-spine/articleshow/27546955.cms


To bypass foreign labour laws, MEA seeks govt staff status for domestic help

Subhomoy Bhattacharjee Posted online: Wed Dec 18 2013, 03:09 hrs
New Delhi : Following the Devyani Khobragade case, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has cleared a proposal to give the status of government employees to the personal staff of Indian diplomats posted abroad, including cooks and other domestic help. This would mean that such staff would not be under the labour laws of the respective countries, and their salary bill would be taken care of by the Government of India.The MEA sent the proposal to the Ministry of Finance on Monday night. If implemented, no foreign country would be able to proceed against any Indian Foreign Service officer on issues related to how they treat their personal staff from India.
The MEA has asked the department of expenditure in the finance ministry to also permit diplomats of the rank of director and above to employ two such staff members. The MEA has said that the financial implication of the proposal would not be substantial as the Indian government already pays an allowance under this head to diplomats posted abroad.
The MEA’s reasoning is that since the Government of India is already issuing official passports, paying for insurance and travel, including one home visit, during the tenure, entering into a short-term government contract does not make any material change but could help avoid such situations in the future.
But the finance ministry is opposed to the plan as it fears that it may become an open-ended liability. An official pointed out that once the personal staff are made government employees, there is no provision in the service manuals to retrench them. “These people cannot be made contract employees with a limited term of employment as that will not provide them the immunity being sought,” explained the official.
As government employees, they would be eligible for all salary and pension privileges.
Moreover, with the number of Indian government employees being posted abroad increasing, there would be copycat demands to give all of them the same status, added the official.
The current practice in the Indian missions abroad is to grant government employee status to those who are recruited from India after undergoing different layers of examination. All other staff are hired on contract and do not enjoy any diplomatic cover.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/to-bypass-foreign-labour-laws-mea-seeks-govt-staff-status-for-domestic-help/1208975/


Devyani live: US confirms strip search, calls it ‘procedure’

by 12 mins ago
7.45 am: Proper procedure was followed in Devyani's arrest: US

The US Marshals Service (USMS) has confirmed that Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade was subjected to "strip search" after her arrest in New York last week, and subjected to the same search procedures as other arrestees.

"As for the type of search, I can only confirm that she was subject to the same search procedures as other USMS arrestees held within the general prisoner population in the Southern District of New York, which in this case was a strip search," USMS spokesperson Nikki Credic-Barrett said yesterday.

In response to a question on putting the her with drug addicts in the cell, she said: "the arrestee was placed in a cell with other female defendants awaiting court proceedings."

She, however, refused to take any position on her arrest, saying said USMS was not the arresting agency and takes no position regarding the appropriateness of her arrest.

The USMS has reviewed its own detention of arrestee Devyani Khobragade and has determined that the USMS, Southern District of New York handled Khobragade's intake and detention in accordance with USMS Policy Directives and Protocols, she said.

7.00 am: US asks India to respect Vienna convention

The US today appealed to India to uphold the Vienna Convention principles and ensure the safety and security of its diplomats stationed in the country, as New Delhi took a series of steps in response to the arrest and inhuman treatment of its diplomat in New York last week. 

"We have conveyed at high levels to the government of India our expectation that India will continue to fulfill all of its obligations under the Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations and consular relations. Obviously the safety and security of our diplomats and consular officers in the field is a top priority," the State Department Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf told reporters at her daily news conference. 

"We'll continue to work with India to ensure that all of our diplomats and consular officers are being afforded full rights and protections. Safety and security of our facilities as well is something we take very seriously, and we'll keep working with the Indians on that," she said. 

Harf was responding to questions about the withdrawal of certain privileges given by India to US diplomats in the country after the arrest and the alleged inhuman treatment of Devyani Khobragade. The Indian government was informed about the allegations of visa fraud 

-- end of updates for 17 December --

9:45 pm: Khobragade put through strip and cavity search like criminals by US

Senior Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade, arrested in New York on charges of visa fraud, was put through both strip and cavity searches, procedures normally used for criminals.

The 39-year-old deputy Consul General in New York, after being arrested and handcuffed in public while dropping her daughter to school on Thursday, was detained with sex workers and drug addicts, sources said.

7.04 pm: Twitter divided over India's reaction on Devyani Khobragade

While India may have taken strict action on how Devyani Khobrage was treated, many on Twitter have questioned why the maid was underpaid.

The twitterati, while suggesting that India was over reacting, were of the opinion that probably the diplomat does deserve to be pulled up, if not in the way the US has gone about it.

Here are some reactions:

 

 

 

 

However there were many who did support India's reaction and also thought that what the US did to her was not correct.

 

 

Meanwhile, this tweet was also making rounds of Twitter, poking fun at the whole incident and revealing the typical Indian mindset.

 

5.23 pm: India demands unconditional apology from US

After taking a number of measure to show its displeasure over the treatment of Devyani Khobragade in New York, India has also demanded unconditional apology from US over the diplomat's humiliation.

4.41 pm: Delhi police remove barricades outside US embassy

After a direction from the the government, the Delhi police has removed barricades outside the US embassy in Delhi.

Such measures were taken to express India's displeasure over the treatment meted out to Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade in New York.

Times Now reportes that the highest ranks of the Delhi police officers are present for the exercise.

3. 20 pm: My daughter's arrest is a conspiracy, says Devyani Khobragade's father

After meeting Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde, Diplomat Devyani Khobragade's father says his daughter's arrest in the US 'is a total conspiracy.'

Earlier, he had said that the Home Minister has assured him that the Indian government will pursue US government to drop charges against Devyani.

2. 55 pm: India asks for details of salaries paid to domestic help

The row over diplomat Devyani Khobragade's arrest has intensified further.  India has now asked for details of salaries paid to domestic help, gardener and other Indian staff in US consulates.

The Indian government has also asked US officials to remove barricades outside the Delhi embassy. India has also stopped all import clearances for US embassy including food, liquor. According to PTI reports, government has also asked for visa and other details of all teachers at US schools.

 

 

2. 50 pm: Arrest same sex companions of US diplomats in India, says Yashwant Sinha

According to NDTV report,  the Indian government has withdrawn airport passes for US consulates and embassies.

Meanwhile,  Senior BJP leader Yashwant Sinha has raised eyebrows with a comment that after the arrest and alleged mistreatment of diplomat Devyani Khobragade in the US, India should reciprocate by arresting the same sex companions of American diplomats using a Supreme Court verdict that restored a ban on gay sex last week.

"My suggestion to the Government of India is, the media has reported that we have issued visas to a number of US diplomats' companions. 'Companions' means that they are of the same sex. Now, after the Supreme Court ruling, it is completely illegal in our country. Just as paying less wages was illegal in the US. So, why doesn't the government of India go ahead and arrest all of them? Put them behind bars, prosecute them in this country and punish them," Sinha said.

1. 30 pm: Govt has assured me full support, says Indian diplomat's father

"The Indian government has assured me full support," the Indian diplomat's father Uttam Khobragade told reporters after meeting Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde.

He said that the Home Minister has assured him that the Indian government will pursue US government to drop charges against Devyani.

Khobragade's father had earlier said that that his daughter is being made "a scapegoat" and asked UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi to intervene to get his daughter back. "It is the government who has send my daughter. It is a political issue between these two countries and my daughter is being made a scapegoat," Devyani's father Uttam Khobragade had said.

1. 15 pm: Salman Khurshid says level of indignity is unacceptable 

Addressing a press conference, External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid termed the arrest of Indian diplomat in a 'barbaric' way as unacceptable.

"We feel an extreme level of distress. This is completely unacceptable. Whatever needs to be is being done. We have put in motion of what we believe will address the issue."

"Have communicated our dissent to the US. I can assure you that we will take this very seriously," Khurshid told reporters.

1. 00 pm:  Turn in your IDs, India tells US diplomats as row escalate

Angry over the "despicable" and "barbaric" treatment meted out to its diplomat, India Tuesday asked US diplomats to turn in their IDs even as Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi and union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde declined to meet a visiting US Congressional delegation.

11. 55 am: Rahul, Shinde refuse to meet US Congressional delegation

Adopting a tough stand, Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi, Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde and Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday refused to meet a visiting US congressional delegation to show India's displeasure over the treatment meted out to Devyani Khobragade, India's deputy consul general in New York.

According to reports, all ministers have been asked to not meet with US ministerial panel to protest the diplomat's arrest.

 

The diplomatic snub comes a day after Lok Sabha Speaker Meira Kumar and National Security Advisor Shivshankar Menon cancelled their meetings separately with the visiting US delegation.

The NSA is known to have described the treatment meted out to Devyani Khobragade, India's deputy consul general in New York, as "despicable" and "barbaric", a source told IANS.

Khobragade was strip searched, confined in a cell with drug addicts and also subjected to DNA swabbing, sources confirmed to IANS.

]Khobragade's arrest raises many questions. PTIKhobragade's arrest raises many questions. PTI
Speaker Meira Kumar, herself a former Indian diplomat, declined to meet the US delegation, comprising Republican and Democrat members, "as a sign of displeasure" over the treatment meted out Khobragade.

Khobragade, one of India's senior diplomats in New York, was charged last week with visa fraud and making false statements.

She was accused by Manhattan's Indian American US Attorney Preet Bharara of visa fraud and exploiting her babysitter and housekeeper. She was handcuffed in public by law enforcement authorities in New York Thursday while she was dropping her daughter at school.

India has termed the treatment meted out to the envoy as "absolutely unacceptable". US Ambassador Nancy Powell was summoned to South Block by Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh Dec 13 and a strong protest lodged over the treatment.

11.30 pm: Khobragade named in housing scam too?

Last year, Khobragade reportedly was one of 15 Indian officials named in an alleged housing scam. She reportedly testified before a judicial panel investigating how she and other people with influence obtained apartments in a new Mumbai co-op built by the government, reports NY Daily News.

11. 20 am: US says standard procedures followed on diplomat Devyani

India's deputy consul general in New York, the US State Department sought to pass the buck to the justice department and the local police.

"The State Department's Diplomatic Security followed standard procedures during the arrest," spokesperson Marie Harf told reporters on Monday when asked why the US was not respecting basic courtesies to a diplomat as it expected others to respect its own diplomats.

"After her arrest, she was passed on to the US marshals for intake and processing. So for any additional questions on her treatment, obviously, this would be the US Marshals and not us. I would refer you there," she said.

11. 10 am: Diplomat Devyani strip-searched, India snubs US team

India's deputy consul general in New York Devyani Khobragade was strip-searched and confined with drug addicts after her detention in a visa fraud case. She was also subjected to DNA swabbing.

On Monday, India retaliated against the US for the humiliation of diplomat with Speaker Meira Kumar and NSA Shivshankar Menon refusing to meet a Congressional delegation on Monday.

Sources confirmed that the government made it a point to convey to the delegation that the Speaker was not going to receive them because she had been deeply troubled by the manner in which Khobragade, who is accused of visa fraud, had been dealt with by the US authorities.

India has been deeply offended by the manner in which Khobragade was treated by the US authorities who chose to ignore her status as a middle-level diplomat from a friendly country. It has continued to emphasize before the state department that the treatment meted out to Khobragade was in complete violation of Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR). http://www.firstpost.com/printpage.php?idno=1291025&sr_no=0

Maria Wirth writes to Jorge Mario Bergoglio on need to respect Hindus

$
0
0
Note: Francis (Latin: Franciscus; Italian: Francesco; born Jorge Mario Bergoglio; 17 December 1936) is the 266th and current Pope of the Catholic Church.

December 11, 2013 Open Letter to Pope Francis
Respected Holy Father,
Great hope for a positive change in the Catholic Church is pinned on the Your Pontificate and recent statements indicate that this hope may not be misplaced. The future, your Holiness said in November 2013, is in the respectful coexistence of diversity and in the fundamental right to religious freedom in all its dimensions, and not in muting the different voices of religion.
This statement makes eminent sense and would need to be implemented by all who presently do not subscribe to a respectful coexistence of diversity in regard to religions. However, I sense (wrongly maybe) that it is a plea for other religions to respect Christianity, rather than a commitment by the Church to respect other religions. To be precise, since Christians are occasionally persecuted in Islamic countries, it seems to be an appeal to ‘live and let live’ between the two biggest religions on earth.
Your Holiness is aware that both, Christianity and Islam, claim to be the only true religion and their God, respectively Allah alone is true. Both religions further hold that all people on earth have to accept this claim and join their particular religion to be saved and reach heaven or paradise. Both give a serious warning to those who don’t join: they will land up eternally in hell. These claims of exclusiveness are made without any evidence whatsoever, apart from the fact that the claims contradict each other, as both cannot be true. They require blind belief, and as blind, unreasonable belief is not natural for human beings, for many centuries it was enforced with state power and indoctrinated right from childhood with the fear of hell as the boogeyman.
May I ask Your Holiness to ponder how the respectful coexistence of diversity and the fundamental right to religious freedom is possible as long as these claims of exclusiveness are in place? Were these claims originally made to gain political power or were they made in the interest of the spiritual welfare of humanity? And may I also ask whether Your Holiness personally believes in these claims?
I trust that privately, Your Holiness does not believe in them, as media reported your statement that good atheists also will be redeemed. In other words, they won’t go automatically to hell. However, the Vatican took pains to clarify that Your Holiness did not mean it. Even my mother, 95 and a staunch Catholic all her life, expressed dismay that a perfectly sensible statement by the Pope was watered down.
Your Holiness may feel compelled for worldly reasons to stick to the claim of exclusiveness as dropping it would entail wrapping up all conversion attempts and in the process lose power, wealth and influence. Further there may be fear that other Christian denominations will not go along and will gain an advantage over the Catholic Church. Still another worry may be that Islam will not drop the claim of exclusiveness and will push aggressively for conversion.
However, the Catholic Church was the first institution to put up this baseless claim, which has brought unspeakable disaster upon humankind. From this claim the Church derived not only the ‘right’, but the ‘duty’ to storm across the globe and impose forcefully her ‘belief system’ - in Europe, in the Americas and in Africa and now in Asia. It was no doubt an ingenious ploy to claim that God wants everyone to become Christian. . Mark Twain famously said, “Religion was born when the first con-man met the first fool”. I would change it, “Dogmatic religion was born when ….”.
Some centuries later, Islam followed suit, claiming that Allah wants everyone to accept Islam, and we all know the violent conflicts resulting from those unsubstantiated claims. Since the Catholic Church started this disastrous trend, she needs to reverse it. The welfare of humanity as a whole has to be the concern and not the welfare of a religious institution. Hopefully Your Holiness has the courage to make a real, clear change for the better and will not fall for hairsplitting theological arguments, like ‘redemption is possible but not salvation’, etc.
Most Christians especially in Europe don’t believe anymore in unreasonable claims. The sad thing is that together with the dogmas, many reject belief in God altogether. They have not learnt to listen to their conscience and to enquire into truth, as the Church has played the role of the conscience- and truth-keeper for too long. The consequences for our societies are there for everyone to see.
However, many Christians do start pondering and believe in a ‘great power’, but not in the Christian God. For example, when I asked some fifty Christians in Germany whether they believe that Hindus who heard about Jesus Christ, but do not convert, will go to hell, nobody said yes. Even a priest said no. And not a single German I met was in favour of missionary activity in India. Yet Pope John Paul II declared in India the intention of the Church to plant the cross in Asia in the new millennium and considered India as a field for a rich harvest, which goes completely against ‘respectful coexistence’.
I live in India since 33 years and can assert with full confidence that India has no need of Christian missionaries, and yet huge sums of money are being pumped in to lure converts with material benefits and to build churches. I am aware that Your Holiness is responsible only for Catholics and not for the myriad of other Christian denominations that prey on poor Hindus, but if the Catholic Church made a start of truly respecting Hindus, it would have a big impact.
Maybe Your Holiness is under the impression that Hinduism is a depraved religion and Hindus would do well to accept the Christian God instead of their multiple gods. Such an impression would be completely wrong. There is no other religion that is –unjustly - denigrated as badly as Hinduism. Sorry to say that Christian (including Catholic) missionaries are in the forefront of this vilification campaign. Few people in the west know how profound India’s ancient tradition is. A solid philosophical basis for our existence and helpful tenets for a fulfilling, meaningful life had been known in India long before ‘religions’, as we know them today, came into being. The only addition Christianity brought in anew, are unverifiable dogmas that cannot possibly have a bearing on the absolute Truth. Can an event in history impact the absolute Truth? Will Truth make a distinction between people who are baptized and those who are not? “There is no salvation outside the Church” is, and I may be excused for using strong language, ridiculous.
The Indian rishis had discovered ages ago that an all-pervading Presence is at the core of this universe, indescribable, but best described as absolute consciousness. Further, the Hindu law of karma preceded the Christian dictum “as you sow so you reap’. A Council stopped Christians from believing in rebirth which would explain many riddles that trouble them, for example why there is great injustice already at birth? The advantage of having a perfect person as a friend and guide on the spiritual path was known in India, but till some 2000 years ago nobody claimed that ‘only’ Krishna or ‘only’ Ram or ‘only’ Buddha can lead to salvation and that whoever does not believe it, goes to hell. “Truth is One, the wise call it by many names”, the Indian rishis declared and listed different names of gods. That was at a time, when Christianity was nowhere in sight. Surely they would have included ‘God’ as another name and Jesus as an avatar, not expecting to be backstabbed by followers of “God” declaring: “Truth is one and must be called only by one name and is fully revealed only in one book.”
The multiple gods in Hinduism are personified powers that help to access the formless, nameless Presence that is in all of us. Christians in India are told that Hindu gods are devils. At the same time, Christianity tries to revive (possibly inspired by Hinduism) belief in angels, as devotion for the Invisible is easier by focusing on images.
Hinduism is not a belief system. It is a knowledge system. It is a genuine enquiry into what is true about us and the world. Hindus are not required to believe anything that does not make sense and can never be verified. There is complete freedom. Yes, most believe in rebirth, which makes sense. Most believe in an all pervading Brahman (many other names are in use) that is also in humans. Most believe that this divine essence can be experienced in oneself, if the person purifies herself by certain disciplines coupled with devotion. This belief is verifiable. It is not blind. There were many Rishis who realized their oneness with Brahman. In Christianity, too, there were mystics who experienced oneness with the Divine like Meister Eckhart did. Sadly, he was excommunicated by the Church. Why is the Church resisting scientific insight that there is some mystery essence in everything? And why is it difficult to accept that in the long, long history of humanity, there were several, not only one, outstanding personalities who showed the way to the truth?
Holy Father, I request you in all sincerity to be such an outstanding personality who guides his followers on a path of expansion, and does not straight-jacket them into an unbelievable belief system, which among others demands converting Hindus to Christianity. Your Holiness is venerated as the representative of the Highest Power in this universe by over a billion of Catholics. Many of your predecessors were not worthy of this veneration. Utmost truthfulness and integrity are required. Calculations about worldly power must not come in the way. The Catholic Church surely would benefit, not lose out, if it honors Truth and gives up its claim that there is no salvation outside the Church. Truth cannot be cheated; neither can it be contained in a book. Truth is what we basically are. Hindus, whose religion is universal and all-encompassing, respect diverse traditions. They are one of the most cultured, gentle and peace-loving people on earth who live and let live, unless greatly provoked.
Holy Father, if you are serious about respecting other religions, the claim of exclusiveness must be scrapped and Hindus who have given to the world a deep philosophy and a great culture, must be respected. Many of us look forward to hearing truly good news from the Catholic Church under your stewardship. The main issue that plagues the Church is not whether women should be priests or whether divorcees can take Holy Communion .The main issue is the unfounded claim of exclusiveness regarding ‘salvation’. It divides humanity into us who are right and saved, versus them who are wrong and damned. Kindly drop this harmful claim and make your Pontificate truly memorable and beneficial for all humanity.
Yours Sincerely
Maria Wirth
Posted as registered letter to Pope Francis on 10th  December 2013 from Puducherry, India

I would rather be without a state than without a voice -- Snowden's letter to people of Brazil

$
0
0
The Greatest Human Rights Challenge Of Our Time
An Open Letter to the People of Brazil
By Edward Snowden
December 17, 2013 "Information Clearing House -  Six months ago, I stepped out from the shadows of the United States Government's National Security Agency to stand in front of a journalist's camera.
I shared with the world evidence proving some governments are building a world-wide surveillance system to secretly track how we live, who we talk to, and what we say.
I went in front of that camera with open eyes, knowing that the decision would cost me family and my home, and would risk my life. I was motivated by a belief that the citizens of the world deserve to understand the system in which they live.
My greatest fear was that no one would listen to my warning. Never have I been so glad to have been so wrong. The reaction in certain countries has been particularly inspiring to me, and Brazil is certainly one of those.
At the NSA, I witnessed with growing alarm the surveillance of whole populations without any suspicion of wrongdoing, and it threatens to become the greatest human rights challenge of our time.
The NSA and other spying agencies tell us that for our own "safety"-for Dilma's "safety," for Petrobras'"safety"-they have revoked our right to privacy and broken into our lives. And they did it without asking the public in any country, even their own.
Today, if you carry a cell phone in Sao Paolo, the NSA can and does keep track of your location: they do this 5 billion times a day to people around the world.
When someone in Florianopolis visits a website, the NSA keeps a record of when it happened and what you did there. If a mother in Porto Alegre calls her son to wish him luck on his university exam, NSA can keep that call log for five years or more.
They even keep track of who is having an affair or looking at pornography, in case they need to damage their target's reputation.
American Senators tell us that Brazil should not worry, because this is not "surveillance," it's "data collection." They say it is done to keep you safe. They're wrong.
There is a huge difference between legal programs, legitimate spying, legitimate law enforcement - where individuals are targeted based on a reasonable, individualized suspicion - and these programs of dragnet mass surveillance that put entire populations under an all-seeing eye and save copies forever.
These programs were never about terrorism: they're about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They're about power.
Many Brazilian senators agree, and have asked for my assistance with their investigations of suspected crimes against Brazilian citizens.
I have expressed my willingness to assist wherever appropriate and lawful, but unfortunately the United States government has worked very hard to limit my ability to do so -- going so far as to force down the Presidential Plane of Evo Morales to prevent me from traveling to Latin America!
Until a country grants permanent political asylum, the US government will continue to interfere with my ability to speak.
Six months ago, I revealed that the NSA wanted to listen to the whole world. Now, the whole world is listening back, and speaking out, too. And the NSA doesn't like what it's hearing.
The culture of indiscriminate worldwide surveillance, exposed to public debates and real investigations on every continent, is collapsing.
Only three weeks ago, Brazil led the United Nations Human Rights Committee to recognize for the first time in history that privacy does not stop where the digital network starts, and that the mass surveillance of innocents is a violation of human rights.
The tide has turned, and we can finally see a future where we can enjoy security without sacrificing our privacy. Our rights cannot be limited by a secret organization, and American officials should never decide the freedoms of Brazilian citizens.
Even the defenders of mass surveillance, those who may not be persuaded that our surveillance technologies have dangerously outpaced democratic controls, now agree that in democracies, surveillance of the public must be debated by the public.
My act of conscience began with a statement: "I don't want to live in a world where everything that I say, everything I do, everyone I talk to, every expression of creativity or love or friendship is recorded.
That's not something I'm willing to support, it's not something I'm willing to build, and it's not something I'm willing to live under."
Days later, I was told my government had made me stateless and wanted to imprison me. The price for my speech was my passport, but I would pay it again: I will not be the one to ignore criminality for the sake of political comfort. I would rather be without a state than without a voice.
If Brazil hears only one thing from me, let it be this: when all of us band together against injustices and in defense of privacy and basic human rights, we can defend ourselves from even the most powerful systems.

Comments (12)

anon's avatar
anon· 5 hours ago
They didn't want this to come out because they knew that it would change behavior on a global scale and the solution would be so simple to implement , it would set the NSA back decades.............."Encryption"
Share/Save/Bookmark
Peacemaker's avatar
Peacemaker· 4 hours ago
Well done Mr Snowden. You have exposed the theft of our personal data on an epic scale. Are there any lawyers out there who could launch snr section. Millions if us would contribute in a class action in every country where the '5 eyes' reside.
Share/Save/Bookmark
James Hufferd's avatar
James Hufferd· 4 hours ago
Edward Snowdon gives renewed voice and pulse and meaning to our so-called Founding Fathers' pledge of their "lives, fortunes, and sacred honor" to move even a single step in the direction of what is right and rightful. O, that we had a million, ten million Edward Snowdens, to have to pass down a world, not just a country, that really is exceptional! Let's all who read his declaration be that and bring down the oppressors, slavemasters, bureaucratic bullies, and nerds who strive to run things!
Share/Save/Bookmark
Randa's avatar
Randa· 3 hours ago
My hope is that Brazil will sing the song of the unsung hero by offering Edward Snowden asylum. 

God I love you Edward Snowden.
Share/Save/Bookmark
1 reply · active 1 hour ago
With my apologies to Edward and Folha, Please allow this small edited paraphrasing. 

If the whole World hears only one thing from me, let it be this: when all of us band together against injustices and in defense of privacy and basic human rights, we can defend ourselves, and even retaliate against, even the most powerful of undemocratic systems. 

With love and greetings to encourage the Brazillian Nation, our heartfelt Thanks.
Share/Save/Bookmark
Toula Siacotos's avatar
Toula Siacotos· 3 hours ago
Thank you Mr. Snowden!
Share/Save/Bookmark
Andre's avatar
Andre· 1 hour ago
"They say it is done to keep you safe." 

The greatest danger we face today is ubiquitous surveillance. We want to be safe from the politicians and government contractors who may have access to all of our digital communications. 

If anyone wants to protect the public from "terrorists", the place to start would be in constraining those who manufacture and distribute weapons.
Share/Save/Bookmark
Falcon & Snowdman's avatar
Falcon & Snowdman· 1 hour ago
"I went in front of that camera with open eyes, knowing that the decision would cost me family and my home, and would risk my life." 

Wow, the little Eddie script just never gets old, huh? Just like a fanboy's crush, I guess. 

"My greatest fear was that no one would listen to my warning." 

Wait, you mean that tired, warmed over nonsense that you re-delivered to us a decade late? Nah, most of us vigilant citizens were warning others about all that crap back in the 90s, bro!! Sorry. 

"The culture of indiscriminate worldwide surveillance, exposed to public debates and real investigations on every continent, is collapsing."

Would that be the "debate" which your sorry psyop ass - and GG's - was intended to start from the beginning of this pathetic fairy tale? Y'know the one that's going to help usher in CISPA and other assorted limitations on our freedoms due to the "debate" your pawny ass has helped bring about? Thanks, Little Eddie!!! 

"The tide has turned, and we can finally see a future where we can enjoy security without sacrificing our privacy." 

Um, do they have good drugs in Russia, little Eddie? B/c 1) NO ONE will ever be able to definitively tell if "they" have dismantled the surveillance apparatus and 2) NOTHING meaningful WHATSOEVER has been done to roll back ANYTHING. But your words are so beautiful... 

"My act of conscience began with a statement: "I don't want to live in a world where everything that I say, everything I do, everyone I talk to, every expression of creativity or love or friendship is recorded. " 

Is this the part where you speeches become more and more like a Twilight novel and then you get whacked or something? Is that how this psyop ends? B/c you really really really seem to feel the need to toot your own self-sacrificial horn a lot, bra! Just sayin'... 

"The price for my speech was my passport, but I would pay it again: I will not be the one to ignore criminality for the sake of political comfort." 

Seriously, little Eddie, sh!t like this might play in Peoria but really? How about GG's getting on the billionaire payroll due to your "leaks"? I bet he's gonna be living in some comfort, huh? How about when he writes that book on you? Oh I see, he gets the loot and you get the fanboys. 

Sounds like a sweet psyopy type dealio. 

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37145.htm

Ohio lawmakers pushing thorium as alternative nuclear fuel. SoniaG UPA, switch to thorium, protect thorium reserves of the world.

$
0
0
Dec 17, 2013, 2:03pm EST

Ohio lawmakers pushing thorium as alternative nuclear fuel

Terry Boose, R-Norwalk, is co-sponsoring a resolution at the Statehouse to promote research and development of energy from thorium reactors.
Terry Boose, R-Norwalk, is co-sponsoring a resolution at the Statehouse to promote research and development of energy from thorium reactors.
Staff reporter- Business First
Email  | Google+  | Twitter | LinkedIn
Two state legislators are on board with an effort to convince federal officials that reactors using thorium as a fuel have the potential to provide ample supplies of low-cost energy without many of the challenges of traditional nuclear power.
Reps. Terry Boose, R-Norwalk, and Andy Thompson, R-Marietta, said they plan to introduce a House Concurrent Resolution to promote research and development of energy from thorium reactors. They see it as a possible long-term solution to Ohio’s energy needs and an opportunity for manufacturers to supply components for the reactors.
The resolution will also ask the U.S. Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission to establish a method to fast-track licensing of liquid fluoride thorium reactors to be built and operated by private industry for production of energy as well as medical isotopes.
An aide to Boose told me the legislators plan to introduce the resolution this week.
In a letter seeking cosponsors for the legislation, Boose and Thompson said thorium, a naturally occurring element, is three to four times more abundant than the uranium used in nuclear reactors. They also said waste generated by thorium reactors is less radioactive and shorter-lived than waste produced by traditional reactors using uranium.
The two lawmakers were familiar with thorium reactors before they approached the Energy from Thorium Foundation for more information, said Don Larson, executive director of the Cleveland-based nonprofit organization.
“When they came to us with the idea for the resolution,” Larson told me, “we said, ‘What can we do to help?”
One of the ways, he said, is to help educate federal regulators about the benefits of thorium reactors. They were first developed in the 1960s by a researcher at Oak Ridge National Laboratories in Oak Ridge, Tenn., but were set aside when the feds committed to uranium as a fuel.
“(Nuclear power) is the most-regulated industry in country,” Larson said, “but it’s not had a lot of startups and new ventures.”
He said there are a few fledgling businesses in other parts of the country that are working on thorium reactor designs. Larson would like to bring them to Ohio, but he also said the greatest financial payoff from thorium would likely be for Ohio manufacturers in the supply chain for the building of reactors.
Larson even went so far as to say the economic benefits from the oil and natural gas shale boom in eastern Ohio “could be a drop in the bucket compared to the manufacture of these reactors.”
Jeff Bell covers the energy industry for Columbus Business First.
http://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2013/12/17/ohio-lawmakers-pushing-thorium-as.html?page=all 

Strip-search and sexuality. Indian vs. American traditions: Devyani case

$
0
0

American arrest and search behavior is venal behavior -- to call is animal behavior is an insult to the animals which are also creations of the Divine cosmic dance.  

In the context of Devyani case, it is time India restores her dharmic pride in the traditions of 'niyama, sayama, shradha नियमसयमश्रद्ध– Right way of deciding things, restraint, reverence/sanctity” and teaches America on the principles of dharma in treating the human body as sacred.


There is divinity in every phenomenon and let not animal instincts be allowed to override cultured, human behavior which has been documented for millennia in Indian traditions. That takes us to another issue: Debate on Section 377 and sexuality as venality.


Kalyanaraman

Published: December 18, 2013 09:42 IST | Updated: December 18, 2013 15:06 IST

Detention procedures applicable to Khobragade, US clarifies

Narayan Lakshman
The Delhi Police remove concrete barricades around the United States Embassy in New Delhi on Tuesday. Photo: Shanker Chakravarty
The Delhi Police remove concrete barricades around the United States Embassy in New Delhi on Tuesday. Photo: Shanker Chakravarty
In the case of the senior Indian diplomat, Deputy Consul General Devyani Khobragade, arrested in New York last Thursday, the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), the “police” of the Department of Justice (DoJ) answered multiple media queries confirming that she had been “strip-searched.”
While it was also clear that she had been handcuffed, the USMS however shied away from providing further details surrounding the conditions of her detention between around 9.10am and 4pm that day, saying only that she was “was subject to the same search procedures as other USMS arrestees in accordance with USMS Policy Directives and Protocols.”
To understand these protocols better, The Hindu identified the specific protocol documents – known as Prisoner Operations Service Directives – that determine what actions the USMS can take against an inmate of the sort that Ms. Khobragade was considered to be.
The documents separately address three USMS protocols, respectively for “body searches,” “restraining devices,” and “DNA sample collection.”
According to the body searches protocols, there are four types of searches that the USMS is authorised to conduct: pat-down search, in-custody search, strip-search and digital cavity search. Of these the USMS and other sources have indicated that the strip-search was performed on Ms. Khobragade.
Defined as a “complete search of a prisoner's attire and a visual inspection of the prisoner's naked body, including body cavities,” the strip-search is typically ordered depending on the circumstances surrounding the prisoner’s detention, specifically whether the is a pre-trial detainee, which the diplomat was.
The USMS protocol mandates that when such a search is conducted Marshals should ensure they have “a private location that prevents all but designated personnel from viewing the prisoner,” and “all attempts to protect the modesty of the prisoner will be made to include modifying viewing and recording of CCTV.”
It also requires that only a deputy of the same-sex can conduct a strip-search unless the person conducting the search is a physician or nurse, and a witness of the same-sex as the person being searched must be present during the search.
The use of “reasonable force” is allowed if the prisoner refuses to cooperate in removing any article of clothing or otherwise impedes the deputy; however Marshals are called upon to do the search “in a professional manner, causing the prisoner as little embarrassment as possible.”
When conducting a strip-search, the deputy will instruct the prisoner to remove all loose articles and conduct “a thorough visual examination of the prisoner's body, from the top of the head to the bottom of the feet,” the protocol says.
The deputy then moves on to inspect behind each ear and look inside the prisoner's ear canals, nostrils, and mouth, checking under the tongue, roof of the mouth, and between the lips and gums.
They are also required to visually inspect down the front of the body, paying close attention to areas such as armpits, breasts, and genital area, the protocol says, including directing the prisoner to “spread her legs and bend forward at the waist [to] observe the anus area and genitals from the rear.”
“Conclude with an observation of the bottoms and between the toes of both feet,” the protocol advises.
In terms of the restraints that may have been used on Ms. Khobragade, USMS protocols firstly mandate that “All persons in the operational custody of the USMS will be fully restrained during transportation,” and the definition of “fully restrained” is that “handcuffs, waist chains, and leg irons (shackles) are required.”
Ms. Khobragade was undoubtedly in transit while under custody on Thursday, as it was initially the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service that arrested near her daughter’s school, then handed over to USMS custody and finally she was produced in a courthouse later that day.
This implies that she is likely to have been “fully restrained” at several points during the day, as defined by the protocol.
Additional protocol-recommended restraints that may have been used include “padlocks, flex cuffs and security boxes.”
Finally, the protocols also call for DNA sampling for all prisoners facing criminal summons by a U.S. District Court for the purpose of facing federal charges “regardless of which federal law enforcement agency is the investigative agency.”
To this end USMS personnel are required to DNA sample collection kits and techniques as provided and advised by the FBI respectively.
Here too the use of “non-lethal force” is allowed within the protocols “as are reasonably necessary to detain, restrain, and collect a DNA sample from an individual who is unwilling to submit to DNA collection.”
According to DoJ documents the most common DNA “reference samples” collected from prisoners are “blood, oral/buccal swabs, and/or plucked hairs (e.g., head, pubic).”
 http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/world/detention-procedures-applicable-to-khobragade-us-clarifies/article5473109.ece

India diplomat 'broke down' after US strip search arrest; govt to make statement in Parliament tomorrow

Agencies  New Delhi, December 18, 2013
First Published: 12:27 IST(18/12/2013) | Last Updated: 12:49 IST(18/12/2013)

The case has escalated into a diplomatic storm between the United States and India. Rajya Sabha MPs also expressed their anger over the issue on Wednesday.
"Government will make a statement on diplomat's arrest in US," said commerce minister Anand Sharma.
Devyani Khobragade is India's deputy consul general in New York. She was arrested last week on charges that she submitted false documents to obtain a work visa for her Manhattan housekeeper.
In an email to her foreign service colleagues in India, the 39-year-old Khobragade said she "broke down many times" and faced "repeated handcuffing, stripping and cavity searches."

Read | US confirms Devyani Khobragade was strip-searched
Khobragade wrote in the email that she repeatedly told arresting authorities that she had diplomatic immunity only to suffer repeated searches as well as being jailed with "common criminals".

Read | Vienna Convention open to varied interpretations
"I must admit that I broke down many times as the indignities of repeated handcuffing, stripping and cavity searches, swabbing, in a hold up with common criminals and drug addicts were all being imposed upon me despite my incessant assertions of immunity," she said in the email.
"I got the strength to regain composure and remain dignified thinking that I must represent all of my colleagues and my country with confidence and pride," she said.
In the email, Khobragade implored the Indian government to ensure her safety and that of her children and preserve the dignity of the Indian diplomatic service which was "unquestionably under siege".
An Indian official with direct knowledge of the case confirmed the email was authentic.
Read | Punish US diplomats with same sex companions: Yashwant Sinha

Meanwhile, US officials admitted on Tuesday that they strip-searched the Indian diplomat after she was arrested in New York in a new twist to a growing row that has seen India hit back with reprisals such as removing security barriers around the US embassy.
The US state department sought to calm tensions saying Thursday's arrest of Devyani Khobragade was an isolated case, and should not be allowed to damage the close ties between India and the United States.
But confirmation from the US Marshals service that Khobragade was treated like any person detained in the bustling metropolis will likely only further fuel Indian ire.

Read:  India withdraws 'special courtesies' accorded to US diplomats
Khobragade was detained for allegedly underpaying her domestic helper who is also an Indian national and for lying on the helper's visa application form.
State department deputy spokeswoman Marie Harf admitted it was a "sensitive issue" but insisted it was a "separate and isolated incident" which should not "be tied together" and allowed to affect broader "close" US-Indian ties.
While the state department is reviewing if all the correct procedures were followed, Harf stressed that the Indian embassy in Washington had been informed of the allegations against the consular official as long ago as September.
Read Khobragade’s non-official duties not covered by diplomatic immunity: US

As a consular official, Khobragade does not have full diplomatic immunity, but has consular immunity which "only applies to things done in the actual functions of one's job," Harf added.
The diplomat had been arrested by the State Department's diplomatic security bureau, and then handed over to the US Marshals Service (USMS) to be processed through the court system.
In a statement, the Marshals confirmed she had been strip-searched and "was subject to the same search procedures as other USMS arrestees held within the general prisoner population in the Southern District of New York."
Although it did not confirm reports that Khobragade was placed with drug addicts, the statement added that she was held in a cell with other female detainees.
"Absent a special risk or separation order, prisoners are typically placed in the general population," the Marshals statement said, adding she had been put in an "available and appropriate cell."
Read | Indian diplomat's father says NY arrest 'barbaric'

Khobragade was released on a bond the same day, and after a review of her case the US Marshals found that the service had "handled Khobragade's intake and detention in accordance with USMS policy directives and protocols."
"All indications are that appropriate procedures were followed. But nonetheless. We understand this is a very sensitive issue, and we're continuing to review exactly what transpired," Harf told journalists on Tuesday.
But the Indian government retaliated by ordering a range of measures including that US consular officials return the ID cards issued by the ministry of external affairs that speed up travel into and through India.
Tow-trucks and mechanical diggers were also seen taking away the heavy barriers which control traffic from the streets around the US embassy in New Delhi, raising fears for the safety of personnel.
Under international treaties, the host nation is responsible for ensuring the security of foreign missions on its soil, and Harf urged the Indian government to meet its obligations to protect US diplomats.
"We'll continue to work with India to ensure that all of our diplomats and consular officers are being afforded full rights and protections," she said.
"The United States and India enjoy a broad and deep friendship, and this isolated episode is not indicative of the close and mutually respectful ties we share," Harf said in an earlier statement.
The case is the latest involving alleged mistreatment of domestic workers by wealthy Indian families. Many are poorly paid in India and rights groups regularly report cases of beating and other abuse.
But the arrest also touches a number of hot buttons in India, where fear of public humiliation, particularly among the middle and upper classes, resonates deeply, and pay and conditions for servants is kept mostly private.
With general elections just months away in India, both the ruling Congress party and the main opposition are keen not to be seen to be too lenient with the United States over the issue.

Read | India withdraws 'special courtesies' given to US diplomats 

Revenge in India's response: US media
India's response to the arrest and alleged ill-treatment of its diplomat Devyani Khobragade has been described in the mainstream American media as "revenge".
The Hill reported it as "an act of revenge", while The New York Times and The Washington Times described it as a "retaliatory" measure, and so did other media outlets.
"The clash between the two supposed allies escalated rapidly on the heels of last week's arrest of Devyani Khobragade, India's deputy consul general in New York. She was accused of submitting false documents to obtain a work visa for her Manhattan housekeeper," Fox News reported.
"India retaliated for the arrest of one of its diplomats in New York by dismantling security barriers on streets around the US Embassy in New Delhi and revoking some privileges given to American consular officials," the Wall Street Journal said.

Read |  Vienna Convention open to varied interpretations

A bulldozer removes the security barriers in front of the US embassy in New Delhi. (Reuters Photo)

Devyani Khobragade case: Meet Preet Bharara, the Indian-American prosecutor who brought down Rajat Gupta and took action against the diplomat

  | Toronto, December 18, 2013 | 07:50
Preet Bharara
US Attorney Preet Bharara.
Devyani Khobragade
India's Deputy Consul General in New York Devyani Khobragade
India's Deputy Consul General in New York Devyani Khobragade would be fairly small fry for US Attorney Preet Bharara - the New York-based federal prosecutor who won the biggest ever insider trading case last month, against SAC Capital.

But Indian-born Bharara has made it clear that there is no offender too big - or too small - to escape his attention. This month alone, actions initiated by his office and convictions include those against Wall Street executives, tax evaders, drug and arms dealers and an Indian American pharmacy owner in Queens.

The escalating diplomatic row between India and the US over the arrest and treatment meted out to Khobragade is in fact the second such tussle set off by the actions of Bharara's office this month. She is charged with giving false information and documents to support her domestic help's visa application.

On December 5, Bharara announced charges against 25 serving and former Russian diplomats and their spouses for allegedly defrauding Medicaid, an American state-run health care programme, to obtain about $1.5 million in benefits over a decade. No arrest was made in that case and Bharara said the case was unlikely to go to trial as the defendants had immunity. At a news conference held to announce the charges, Bharara said it was a case "we would be prosecuting and making arrests in, but for immunity". But he noted that participation in crimes by diplomats generally leads to expulsion from a country.

The charges drew a sharp rebuke from Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov who blamed the criminal case on "Russophobic forces", although the US state department downplayed the case saying it should not affect bilateral ties.

Talking about Khobragade's case, State Department Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf said: "The US and India enjoy a broad and deep friendship, and this isolated episode is not indicative of the close and mutually respectful ties we share."

As the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Bharara is considered to be one of the most powerful prosecutors in America and was handpicked by US President Barack Obama for this position in May 2009. His term expires next year and it is widely speculated he could run for higher political office. One of his predecessors, Rudy Giuliani, went on to become the Mayor of New York City and was a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008.

Is Bharara targeting Indians?

Bharara on the cover of Time magazine.
Rajat Gupta
Former Goldman Sachs director Rajat Gupta who was prosecuted for insider trading. Photo: AP
Mails circulating among South Block officials show Bharara has come under scanner for targeting people of Indian origin. Before spearheading proceedings against Devyani, Bharara had hit the headlines for prosecuting ex-McKinsey MD Rajat Gupta for insider trading charges. Many from the diplomatic community wondered why there was no thought given to bringing to justice those who committed crimes against India.

It may be mentioned that US courts have been admitting law suits filed by pro-Khalistani groups against Indian leaders. Summons were issued to leaders like Congress president Sonia Gandhi and Union Minister Kamal Nath and even the Congress party in connection with the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. "How are the US courts concerned with a matter that did not occur within its territory?" a senior official wondered.

The development surrounding Devyani brought back memories of Krittika Biswas, the daughter of an Indian diplomat posted at the Indian Consulate in New York, who was arrested in her school, handcuffed and forced to spend 28 hours in a detention cell for cyber bullying in February 2011. It was later found that another student was responsible for the crime.

US seeks security of diplomats after India retaliates over Devyani Khobragade arrest

  | Washington, December 18, 2013 | 05:21
Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade
Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade
The US on Tuesday appealed to India to uphold the Vienna Convention principles and ensure the safety and security of its diplomats stationed in the country, as New Delhi took a series of steps in response to the arrest and inhuman treatment of its diplomat in New York last week.

"We have conveyed at high levels to the government of India our expectation that India will continue to fulfil all of its obligations under the Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations and consular relations. Obviously the safety and security of our diplomats and consular officers in the field is a top priority," the State Department Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf told reporters at her daily news conference.

"We'll continue to work with India to ensure that all of our diplomats and consular officers are being afforded full rights and protections. Safety and security of our facilities as well is something we take very seriously, and we'll keep working with the Indians on that," she said.

Harf was responding to questions about the withdrawal of certain privileges given by India to US diplomats in the country after the arrest and the alleged inhuman treatment of Devyani Khobragade.
The Indian government was informed about the allegations of visa fraud against Khobragade in September, she claimed.
India had withdrawn several privileges given to US diplomats after Devyani Khobragade was arrested.


"The State Department advised the embassy of the Republic of India in writing in September of allegations of abuse made by an Indian national against the Deputy Consular General of India in New York," she said in response to a question.

The United States will continue to have conversations with the Indian government to make sure their facilities are properly secured, Harf said.

Top State Department officials, including the Deputy Secretary William Burns, the Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Nisha Desai Biswal and the US Ambassador to India Nancy Powell have been in close communications with top Indian officials in this regard, she said, adding that a lot of demarches have been issued by India on this issue.

She said US Secretary of State John Kerry is aware of the issue.

"We have called on them to uphold all of their obligations under the Vienna Convention, everything that they are obligated to do according to our diplomats' rights and all of the things that go under the Vienna Convention," Harf said.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/devyani-khobragade-new-york-us-india-vienna-convention-principles-new-delhi/1/331695.html

Devyani Khobragade case: Why we must humiliate the Americans

by 8 mins ago
The despicable treatment of Devyani Khobragade, Indian Deputy Consul general in New York, should be another wake up call for India and talk-circuit liberals. If you do not have the means to project power effectively, the world will walk all over you.

It is good that India is in a mood to retaliate, but it is important for us to persist with it long after this is over. Moreover, we should equip ourselves with more laws to target foreign countries that use their domestic laws to blackmail or humiliate us. We should not take such affronts lying down anymore.

In a limited sense, the transgressions of US minimum wages law by Khobragade will draw the usual Indian liberal nonsense: if we are in contravention of their law, we are the guilty party. Worse, some of us will also express sneaking admiration for the US's ability to enforce its own law, as opposed to our own inability - or systemic unwillingness - to enforce ours.

Not only is this a na�-ve view, but bull. Hear what Khobragade had to say about her arrest, and judge for yourself if this is the right way to deal with a brech of minimum wages law. The Indian Express, quoting from her email to colleagues, has this Indian Foreign Service (IFS) officer saying this about her horrifying experience. “I must admit that I broke down many times as the indignities of repeated handcuffing, stripping and cavity searches, swabbing, hold up with common criminals and drug addicts were all being imposed upon me despite my incessant assertions of immunity.”
]Devyani Khobdagade. IBN Live.Devyani Khobdagade. IBN Live.
Our general assumption that the US law enforcers are merely doing their duty is rubbish. If alleged violation of US visa laws by Infosys can be settled with a fine, why couldn't the US have done so for Khobragade? Or is a woman diplomat fair game for US law enforcers?

Indians are the most gullible goops in the world when it comes to discerning the difference between an honest effort to implement the law and using laws to project power and blackmail other countries. The American government is the most sophisticated legally illegal enterprise in the world when it comes to dealing with people from other countries. And Americans are one of the most sophisticated bigots in the world.

There are two reasons why we are so bad at recognising this: one is because we are very poor readers of real intent as we have not studied the west on our terms. The second reason is even worse: we are the most compromised individuals when it comes to America. Every bureaucrat and politician and media hack sends his or her children to America or Europe to study, or is given high paying jobs in US multinationals. Thus, many of them would have received favours from the American establishment. So when it comes to standing up to America to defend our own interests, our worthies are unable to take a strong view on what is right for our country.

There is also a third reason: we are simply too self-absorbed and willing to forget and move on in the pursuit of narrow, short-term personal interest. The Americans will go to the ends of the earth to pursue Osama bin Laden or even their own Islamic terrorists for 10 years. We will forget Hafiz Saeed five years after 26/11. The Americans will not let us forget 2002 - not because they care about the Muslims they themselves ostracise in their own country, but because it is a useful stick to hold over someone who could be our next PM.

There is also another counter-intuitive reason why we are unable to see American bad faith: America does not use its laws to harass its own citizens, while we do the exact opposite. Thus we are willing to stretch the argument and believe that America must be using its laws fairly against the rest of the world.

What absolute rot. The truth is American agencies have sophisticated ways of using their laws against foreigners to defend their interests. Their laws may oppose torture, so they will use Guantanamo Bay to for torture and waterboarding against prisoners. President Obama vowed to shut it down, but Guantanamo is still around. Even if it is shut, they will ask allies in brutal Africa or Thailand to do their dirty work.

Americans are forbidden by their own laws to indulge is assassinations abroad, but Obama has converted the CIA into a killing machine. Two years ago, they killed one of their own nationals - Anwar al-Awlaki, for example - because of his alleged terror links (not proven in a court of law). The Americans regularly use drones against civilians in Afghanistan and Pakistan and South Yemen on the plea that one among them may be a terrorist. To have plausible deniability, they even use private surveillance and security agencies as surrogate CIA agents. (Read Mark Mazzetti's eyeopening book, The Way of the Knife, to get a glimpse into this).

Their freedom of religion laws will be used against the one country which actually allows everyone to practice and propagate his religion (India), but top allies like Saudi Arabia will get a free pass on this law. America will swear by free markets to lobby for Wal-mart, but will not recognise freedom for labour movement. Is free enterprise only about the movement of capital and not other factors of production?

The Americans practice sophisticated racism. Thus they will use a Preet Bharara to target Khobragade (or Rajat Gupta or Raj Rajaratnam) so that it looks like Indian-Americans are implementing the law, and hence not racist, but the same laws will not be used to humiliate the Hispanics or Afro-Americans or the Saudis or American icons like the late Steve Jobs or to convict Richard Nixon or Bill Clinton. (Read the comments on a Washington Post story on Preet Bharara, where the commenter accuses Bharara of not following up on the alleged misdemeanours of some pillars of the American judicial establishment.)

Americans, despite paying very little of the UN bill, will not allow US soldiers to serve under generals of another nation, and Americans accused of war crimes cannot be tried anywhere else but in holier-than-thou US of A.

I can go on and on, but we must focus on the one issue I still left unaddressed: what do the Americans gain by targeting Khobragade? Or, for that matter, by denying Narendra Modi a visa, especially since Americans have always extolled business friendly politicians everywhere? Modi ought to have been their natural ally?

In the Khobragade case, my guess is that the US government and arrogant Preet Bharara miscalculated on how India will respond. They thought there will be the usual diplomatic muttering under the breath and then business as usual. Moreover, the US can always count on compromised bureaucrats and corrupt politicians to abandon their own diplomat.

But two things conspired to stiffen Indian spines. One, the IFS officers' body is not going to see one of their own humiliated thus. And two, Narendra Modi is another reason. The UPA has hanged Afzal Guru and Ajmal Kasab to undercut Modi's hard appeal, and Modi is due in Mumbai on 22 December. Khobragade is Mumbai's child and her father was a city bureaucrat before retirement. One can imagine how Modi would have damned the UPA for cowardice when he addresses Mumbai crowds.

Which brings me to the last motive: why deny Modi a visa if you know he could well be the next PM? The US would never do this to a Saudi King, a Pakistani General or a Vladimir Putin or a Mossad agent, or a Chinese official, no matter what kind of atrocities they may have committed in their own countries.

The answer is simple: the earlier visa denial was driven by the need to pander to the domestic evangelical organisations which were baying for Modi's blood. Evangelicals believe that Modi may act against their conversions agenda. The second reason is future leverage. The Americans want to use the visa as a bargaining chip in case Modi is the next PM, even though they hope he won't become the PM. They fear that he will play hardball - exactly what the US does always. The US fears its own kind more than weak-kneed Indians politicians.

It is critical that India should not close the chapter on the Khobragade affair for a few conciliatory noises. We have to bare our fangs and show some muscle. The chances are the US will do a deal and extract concessions from the UPA government to let Khobragade off the hook. And the Indian side will bow to this blackmail and claim their hard stance has paid off and declare victory.

I hope this story does not play out. There are times when we have to show we are Indians, and this is one of those times. The only right response to the Khobragade insult is to treat Americans the same way they treat our kind: catch hold of a technical violator of Indian law, do some handcuffing and "cavity searches" on some of the men arrested, and then bargain about Khobragade. At the very least, we should target Preet Bharara for humiliating an Indian diplomat and make sure he never enters this country again.

http://www.firstpost.com/world/devyani-khobragade-case-why-we-must-humiliate-the-americans-1293367.html

Debate on Section 377 and sexuality. Thanks to Prof. Kapil Kapoor for the guidance on sex education.

$
0
0
Debate on Section 377 and sexuality

The debate on Section 377 should be framed within the context of dharma, a global ethic which is inviolate in Indian tradition. A rashtram has to be a dharma saapeksha rashtram to promote and protect dharma.

Is our Constitution and the rule of law in consonance with this imperative of dharma?

As Prof. Kapil Kapoor notes: “niyama, sayama, shradhaनियमसयमश्रद्ध– Right way of deciding things, restraint, reverence/sanctity” are given importance in Indian society which restricts sex within the institution of marriage (ek pati/patni) for procreation.

The institution of marriage is central to the institution of family which is the bedrock of Indian polity. Family in the Indian tradition is a paramount economic institution which also finds expression in an extended family of caste (jaati) in social organization.

If attitudes of sexuality go berserk threatening this fundamental institution, the whole social edifice collapses.

Prof. Kapil Kapoor calls for sex education in the context of Indian traditions which have stood the test of time for millennia.

In matters related to sex, Indian traditions have established the frontiers of dharma.

http://bharatkalyan97.blogspot.in/2013/12/sec-377-hindu-view-of-alternate.htmlSec. 377: A Hindu view of alternate sexuality -- Sandhya Jain 


Srimad Bhagvatam (4.28.61) says, “Sometimes you think yourself a man, sometimes a chaste woman and sometimes a neutral eunuch. This is all because of the body, which is created by the illusory energy. This illusory energy is My potency, and actually both of us – you and I – are pure spiritual identities. Now just try to understand this. I am trying to explain our factual position.” This verse has generally been understood as recognition of three genders and sexual orientations. Several texts, including the Kama Sastra and Narada smriti, and medical texts like the Caraka Samhita (4.2), Sushruta Samhita (3.2) and Smriti Ratnavali, and Sanskrit dictionaries and lexicons like Amarakosa and Sabda-Kalpa-Druma include references to tritiya Prakriti (eunuchs, or persons who cannot be exclusively categorised as male or female). This third gender has generally been held to include bisexuals, homosexuals, intersexuals, transexuals and asexuals. Patanjali takes notice of the third sex, as do some medieval era Jaina Acharyas who note that third-sex desire can be very intense. The overall attitude has been one of accommodation. The Dharma sastra and dharma sutra texts maintain that the third gender should be minimally maintained by their family members as they usually do not have children (Manu smriti 9.202, Arthasastra 3.5.30-32), and do not inherit property. The Vasista Dharmasutra advises the king (State) to maintain third-gender citizens with no family members and the Arthasastra forbids vilification of third-gender men or women (3.18.4-5). In the Mahabharata, king Virata shelters Arjun as the eunuch Brihannala; he teaches dance to the royal princess who later becomes his daughter-in-law.

Thoughts on High Court Legalizing Animal Instincts (Delhi High Court’s 2009 judgment on Section 377 of IPC):
India is a hot country.  Our customs and our practices accordingly require people living in an ordered society to regulate sex. Our shastras, Vedas and other holy books guide us to restrain sexual indulgence up to the age of 25. But it is very strange that high court has legalized homosexuality. Unnatural sex and unrestrained indulgence in sex destroy civilizations.
Go back to the Bible. In the Old Testament, we are told that the cities of Sodom and Gomorhea – note the names – were destroyed by the wrath of God on account of immoral ways of the people. And the ancient Persians hated the Greeks because they practiced homosexuality and lesbianism – there was an island Lesbos – and through successive invasions were instrumental in ending the high Greek civilization.
Our society for the last 5000 years has survived because it is founded on values. Three cardinal values are – niyama, a preferred way of doing things, sanyama, individual and social restriant and shraddha, respect for things/people/values/society.
It is unfortunate that the country’s official policy since 1950 has promoted the opposite of these values – freedom to do what you want to do, indulgence and an absence of respect for age, knowledge and values. Our society will undergo a cataclysmic conflict   between the India governed by English knowing westernized, urban elite and the mass of people – what form it takes and when, we don’t know but an ancient civilization that has faced so many challenges will not give up.
How can a judge say that moral values of a society are not the basis of law. Then what is the basis? A borrowed constitution? Animal instincts? 
This philosophy has inbuilt destruction. Open display of vulgar sexuality on the roads, media and official support for all this – this is the road to ruin.
The best way is to let unnatural practices be just as we let gutters be. But we do not open up the gutters and glamorize them.
          We are in trouble because all the rulers – politicians, officials, media persons – have been educated in an educational system that as a matter of policy excludes the intellectual texts of our civilization and feeds them on the diet of an alien culture with the result that those who come out of this system are at best ignorant and at worst have contempt for their own culture. They are driving this society. 
Last week I was watching the debate on India TV on this issue. One of the debaters , a doctor said to Baba Ramdev that he does not know about science and human psychology. Is the doctor aware of what India has over thousands of years explicitly said about sexuality, normal and deviant?  Or is he wiser than all the thinkers and texts that are till today object of deep study in major western universities?
Are we animals?  Will we go on to legalize all animal instincts – violence, revenge? But I think we are not in an age where thinking is popular or respected.
2.4.13 Dr. Kapil Kapoor while drawing attention of the Committee to the fallout of sex education in the western countries, was of the view that the cultural attitude to sexuality in our country which had produced magnum opus like Kama Sutra is different from the western country.  As per our culture, sex had been considered as sacred union and tempered through self-imposed restraint and abstinence through societal regulation.  The Indians socially, therefore, restrict sex within the institution of marriage (ek pati/patni) for procreation.  Indian society gives importance to niyama(the right way of deciding things), sayama(restraint) and shradha (reverence/sanctity).   Sex (Kama) had been prescribed to be exercised within the boundary of dharma (righteousness).  According to him the unbridled sexuality prevalent in the Northern Hemisphere would corrupt our society which had attempted to uphold highest ethical standards and it might end up in ethical vacuum, as had happened in the western society.  He emphasised that our children should be taught self-restraint, character-building, reverence for people and wisdom, in place of ... sex-education. (Source: C.S.II. -135RAJYA SABHA COMMITTEE ON PETITIONS Hundred and Thirty-fifth Report on Petition praying for national debate and evolving consensus on the implementation of the policy for introduction of sex education in the Schools and holding back its introduction until then(Presented to Hon'ble Chairman, Rajya Sabha on 2nd April, 2009)
                            



Khobragade affair and SoniaG summons. US Visa for travel of Richard's family shows well-orchestrated drama of arrest by US State Dept.

$
0
0
Has India's strong reaction 2 Devyani outrage anything to do with fact that it coincided with an insolent US court sending Sonia a summons?

Published: December 18, 2013 16:45 IST | Updated: December 18, 2013 16:45 IST
Khobragade affair

Maid’s family given US visas just before diplomat's arrest

Making the controversy over the arrest and maltreatment of Indian diplomat Devyani Khobargarde murkier, it has now emerged that the husband and two children of the absconding maid had obtained US visas and flown to New York.
The maid Sangeeta Richard’s family left for New York just two days before Dr. Khobargade was arrested, strip searched and lodged with common criminals for discrepancy in work contract with the maid Sangeeta Richards.
Ms. Richard’s family was given U.S. visas even though New Delhi had been regularly petitioning the Americans to trace her after she went missing in June and send her back to the country. There was also a court injunction against the maid after India complained that she had absconded with her diplomatic passport.
India is demanding the diplomat be allowed to return home and all charges against her dropped.
Unlike two previous cases, this was the first time the U.S. Government had filed criminal charges.
India has refuted the contention that security of the U.S. Embassy had been compromised with the removal of concrete barricades. The police picket and the usual complement of the diplomatic security force still keeps tabs on the security around the embassy.
As for narrowed parking space around the embassy, this was a reciprocal gesture after the reserved parking slot opposite the Indian Embassy in Washington was converted into a general parking lot.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/maids-family-given-us-visas-just-before-diplomats-arrest/article5474135.ece

Dec. 17, 2013

New Delhi: Devyani Khobragade, who is caught in the line of fire, is the daughter of a retired IAS officer of Maharashtra cadre Uttam Khobragade. Born and brought up in Mumbai, she went to Mount Carmel school. Later she did MBBS from Seth GS medical college and KEM hospital in Mumbai. But she did not pursue her career in medicine and opted for the Foreign Service. Her uncle Dr Ajay M Gondane is also an IFS officer of 1985 batch.
Beautiful and intelligent Devyani cleared the prestigious Indian Foreign Service (IFS) in 1999. She handled political division of Indian missions in Pakistan, Italy and Germany before moving to the much coveted Indian embassy in the United States of America (USA). She is currently posted as a deputy consul general of India in New York.
Devyani is married to a professor and has two daughters aged three and six years. "Devyani works for the Indian Foreign Service. She is currently a Director in the Ministry of External Affairs. Devyani has worked in the political divisions of the Indian Missions in Pakistan, Italy and Germany. She has studied Medicine and is proficient in English, Hindi, German, and her mother tongue, Marathi. Devyani originally belongs to Mumbai. Her passions are travelling, reading, yoga, music and dancing. Apart from proudly raising two beautiful girls, she also wishes to contribute towards dalit and gender equality in her country," her profile among 2012 Chevening Rolls-Royce scholars says. She was selected for the Chevening Rolls-Royce scholarship in 2012.
Devyani Khobragade - A doctor turned diplomat

"I am helping to change the way the world sees arts education. Join me in supporting Project Art," Devyani had tweeted earlier.

Devyani had tweeted a few months ago mentioning about her involvement in social service "I am helping to change the way the world sees arts education. Join me in supporting Project Art."
She claims that her passions are traveling, reading, yoga, music and dancing.
Devyani is not new to controversies. Her name was figured in Mumbai's Adarsh Housing society scam, two years ago. According to media reports Devyani, who already owned a house in Mumbai which was also allotted under the state government's 10 per cent quota got another flat at the Adarsh in 2005-06.
Even though Devyani and her father were never questioned by the CBI, her father had deposed before a two-member commission of enquiry probing the Adarsh scam. He had told the commission that it was not his or his daughter's duty to inform the government about the flats owned by them.
She had hired an Indian woman Sangeetha Richard as a babysitter and domestic assistant in late 2012. Her babysitter left for a departmental store in last June and never returned. She went to an American attorney who is specialized in immigration matters and complained about the alleged Visa fraud. The Indian embassy in the USA declared the nanny absconder and requested the US authorities to deport her.
Devyani went to the Delhi High Court asking it to restrain her former employee. The Delhi high court ordered Sangeetha Richard not institute any action against Devyani outside the Indian judiciary.

Since her nanny is now an illegal migrant in the USA, Indian laws have little control over her.
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/devyani-khobragade--a-doctor-turned-diplomat/440161-3.html

SankarK as @SMedia4

Devyani case not Goldstandard for indignation.Once her maid Sangeetha absconded ,her family hounded husband child detained and NBW issued


Devyani case: 'India must tell US the other side of the story'


Comment   Share     Text size:  A   A   A

December 18, 2013 14:21 IST
Indian agencies are trying to get in touch with the family of Sangeeta Richard, the nanny who filed a complaint against Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade, who was arrested and later released last week in connection with an allegedly 'fradulent' visa application for her housekeeper and babysitter .
Hailing from Punjab, Sangeeta has been missing since June and sources tell rediff.com that she is still in the United States of America.
She had been declared as an absconder by India after she went missing since June. There is a hunt on to trace her and the Indian agencies have their task cut out. They have been trying to get more information from her husband and the rest of the family members, who are in India.
Sources also point out that some of Sangeeta’s family members who are in touch with her indicate that she has not returned to India. Taking into account the sensitivity of the issue, the Indian officials do not want to reveal more details.
“She is not in India and we are getting some information from her family,” an officer pointed out.
There is a good chance that some of the family members may be flown into the US in order to find her.
“Sangeeta is very important to the case and having her depose at this stage is very important,” the official said, adding, “While the nanny may have her side of the story it is very important for us to convey to the US the other side of the story as well”.
“Did she agree to work for less salary, did she start blackmailing the diplomat and why was a case filed even after an injunction by the Delhi high court?” the official asked.
The Delhi high court in an interim order had directed the nanny not to file any case against Devyani outside India. Moreover the officials would also want to know why she went absconding since June.
Image: Devyani Khobragade. Courtesy: Facebook

@timesofindia@timesofindia : India accuses US of visa fraud, transfers Devyani to permanent mission at UNhttp://t.co/hUVhUqadeV 12 minutes ago

Why was the Sangeetha family flown out?

Sangeetha Richard's passport was revoked in July :)-- Family allowed to fly with US Visa just two days before Khobaragade arrest and cavity search humiliation. Maybe, Richard is a US citizen or given political asylum by USA?

Who was the double-agent since normally such flying-out operations are to protect spies? 

Mystery deepens in Khobragade and maidservant Sangeetha Richard affair. Kanchan Gupta's questions should be answerd by US State Dept.

$
0
0

American conspiracy behind Devyani Khobargade’s arrest!

By Kanchan Gupta on18 Dec 2013
The maid Sangeeta Richard’s family was flown out of India two days before the diplomat was arrested. There are allegations that the US authorities had even paid for the passage of the maid’s family.
US State Department was informed maid's passport had been revoked. They were told to locate missing maid. Yet US gives family visas?

This is absolutely unbelievable. US gave visas to maid's family despite knowing of court orders?

Devyani's maid's family whisked out of India by US on Dec 10? What's happening?
  1. Far too many questions than answers in the Devyani case. Some more questions got added today.
  2. All who were "harassed' (at work, while commuting, by a sarkari babu, by a municipality clerk) today please apply for and demand a US visa.
http://www.niticentral.com/2013/12/18/american-conspiracy-behind-devyani-khobargades-arrest-170100.html


Family of Devyani’s maid whisked off to US 2 days before diplomat’s arrest


Niticentral Staff18 Dec 2013

Devyani Khobragade shifted to permanent mission in New York
The American conspiracy behind Devyani Khobargade’s arrest began to unravel when it was learnt that the maid Sangeeta Richard’s family was flown out of India two days before the diplomat was arrested. there are allegations that the US authorities had even paid for the passage of the maid’s family. Though it is premature to guess what could be the motive behind this preempted move, yet conspiracy theorists are spinning various stories.
According to reports, the husband and two children of the absconding maid had obtained US visas and flown to New York.
Meanwhile, India has shifted Devyani Khobragade to permanent mission in New York to ensure diplomatic immunity.
39-year-old Khobragade, a 1999-batch IFS officer, was taken into custody on a street in New York as she was dropping her daughter to school before being released on a $ 250,000 bond after pleading not guilty in court.
Earlier, she was released on a $ 250,000 bond after pleading not guilty in court.
Devyani Khobragade, 39, was taken into custody on a street as she was dropping her daughter to school at 9 am on December 12 after the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, India-born Preet Bharara, announced charges of visa fraud against her.
Here is a timeline of how the case which has snowballed into a major diplomatic face-off -
Devyani Khobragade’s maid Sangeeta Richard had arrived in the US and started to work for on since November 23, 2012.
Richard expressed her desire to work outside on her off days but she was prohibited from doing so since it was illegal according to her visa status since she had an official passport on March 2013.
Sangeeta Richard left the diplomat’s home to buy groceries on June 23, never to return. Devyani Khobragade informed the Consulate General of this development, who in turn informed the concerned authorities on the same day.
Sangeeta Richard had visited an immigration attorney in New York on July 8.
It is reported that there were discussions and that Sangeeta Richard demanded a certain sum as her wages and an ordinary Indian passport.
The Indian Government revoked Sangeeta Richard’s official passport that very day which made her status illegal in the US.
The Indian embassy in Washington DC formally put in a request with the US authorities to locate Sangeeta Richard and return her to India.
In September 2013, the Delhi High Court issued an order to restrain Sangeeta Richard from instituting any action or proceedings against Khobragade outside India on the issues of her employment as had been declared in a statement issued by the Indian embassy in US. Justice Jayant Nath had ruled that any grievance regarding terms of employment, salary or ill treatment could be adjudicated only by an Indian court as she and the diplomat are both employees of the Government of India.
It is being reported that the High Court had also issued a notice to Sangeeta Richard’s husband Philip in Delhi which is scheduled for a hearing in February, 2014.
As per Indian authorities an arrest warrant was also issued against Sangeeta Richard by the Metropolitan Magistrate of a South District Court in Delhi under Sections 420, 387, 120B of the IPC.
Sources say that since Sangeeta Richard left her employment within six months of her arrival in the US there is valid cause for suspicion.
Now that the news of Sangeeta Richard’s family’s fleeing has been confirmed, it can raise many eyebrows.

Devyani Khobragade arrest linked to US Immigration fraud -- Nidhi Razdan. Why was Khobragade transferred to UN Mission?

$
0
0

Devyani Khobragade arrest row: India accuses US of immigration fraud


New Delhi In the middle of a snowballing diplomatic row over the arrest and humiliation of high-ranking Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade in the US, India has accused the American government of facilitating immigration fraud by the woman who worked for the diplomat and whose complaint led to the latter's arrest. (Diplomat arrest row - latest developments)
 
NDTV has learnt that the family of Sangeeta Richard, the Indian woman who worked for Devyani Khobragade for nine months till June this year, left for America on December 10, two days before the diplomat's arrest.
 
Ms Richard had complained that her employer made her falsify documents for her visa application, and made her work a 40-hour week on just three dollars a day. (Read: Charges against Devyani Khobragade)Her complaint led to Ms Khobragade's arrest for alleged visa fraud on Thursday last, followed by strip-search by US marshals. The diplomat was also swabbed for DNA and subjected to cavity-search before being put in a cell with drug addicts. (Read: Embarrassing failure of US protocol,says diplomat's attorney)
 
New Delhi had immediately told the US that Ms Richard was absconding, and faced an arrest warrant in India.
 
Devyani_Khobragade_caption_new_360x270.jpgReliable sources say in June, India had lodged a complaint and filed a missing person report in New York, but the police there did nothing about it. They also allege that the US did not respond to repeated requests to help find the woman, whose name surfaced next when Ms Khobragade was arrested.
 
India had asked the American Embassy for help to find Ms Richard way back on July 5, said the sources.
 
Ms Richard, who remained in hiding, reportedly met an immigration lawyer in the US in September and asked for 10,000 dollars and a passport to stay on in the country.
 
At the same time, the Delhi High Court passed an injunction against Ms Richard on September 21, which, India says, was shared with the US Embassy.
 
On Wednesday, officials learnt that Ms Richard's family left for the US last week before the authorities there initiated action against the diplomat. 

Live: Did US help Devyani’s maid pull of immigration fraud?

by 26 mins ago
6.42: Now India accuses US of indulging in immigration fraud

According to a report on NDTV, after it was revealed that Sangeeta Richard's husband and son flew to New York just two days before Devyani Khobdagade was arrested, India has accused the US of facilitating immigration fraud by Richards. According to the report, shortly after Richard walked out of Khobdagade's home, the representative of Indian government had filed a missing complaint with the US in June. However, the police there refused to take any action on the case and the US authorities dismissed several requests made by the Indian government to help find Richard. The report says:
"India had asked the American Embassy for help to find Ms Richard way back on July 5, said the sources. Ms Richard, who remained in hiding, reportedly met an immigration lawyer in the US in September and asked for 10,000 dollars and a passport to stay on in the country."

The series of action on behalf of the US led India to accuse US of helping Richard pull off an immigration fraud.

6.12 pm: Maid's family flew to New York two days before Devyani's arrest

According to a PTI flash, Khobragade's absconding maid Sangeeta Richard's family flew to New York on 10 December, just two days before the diplomat's arrest.

5.18 pm: US bristles at India's retaliatory moves

While the US Marshals justified strip searching Devyani Khobdagade by saying she was subjected the standard search procedures in the country, reaction of India's retaliation seems to be making their way into the US' mainstream media. An article on New York Times, alongside reporting the proceedings and the diplomatic war between US and India, suggested that the country is outraging over the 'disrobing' of a 'middle class' Indian woman where as domestic helps are treated 'abominably' in India. In the piece, Gardiner Harris, says:
"It is not unusual in India for domestic staff to be paid poorly and be required to work more than 60 hours a week; they are sometimes treated abominably. Reports of maids being imprisoned or abused by their employers are frequent.

But the idea of a middle-class woman being arrested and ordered to disrobe is seen as shocking. Airport security procedures in India provide separate lines for women, and any pat-down searches are performed behind curtains."

The piece seems to suggest that domestic helps in India are almost always abused in Indian households. It also seems to say that the Indian government and media's reaction to the diplomat's arrest was somehow connected with the fact that Devyani Khobadgade belongs to the middle class and possibly women from less affluent backgrounds don't invite the same kind of attention when faced with abuse or unfair persecution at the hands of law.

Is this a start of US media backlash against the India's response to the issue?

4.00 pm: India shifts Devyani to permanent diplomatic mission in New York

To ensure complete diplomatic immunity to Devyani Khobragade, India has shifted her to the permanent New York diplomatic mission, The Indian Express reported.

There however is a complication. According to The Indian Express report, Devyani will have to apply for a fresh diplomatic card through the UN Secretariat, which would ultimately go for clearance to the US State Department. India is hopeful that Washington will issue the card and, in doing so, extend full immunity to her.

If this process were to go through, sources said, it would ensure that Khobragade would not be subjected to any arrest or custodial interrogation in the future, the report further states.

2:40 pm: Protest held outside US Embassy in Delhi over treatment of diplomat

A protest rally is being held outside the US embassy over the treatment meted out to the Indian diplomat.

Firstpost's photojournalist Naresh Sharma reports that the protest rally was being held some distance away from the US embassy and the protesters were some distance away from the building when they were detained by the police.

Here's an image of the protesters:

]The protest held outside the US embassy. Naresh Sharma/ FirstpostThe protest held outside the US embassy. Naresh Sharma/ Firstpost
1.35 pm: PM slams US for treatment meted out to Devyani

Amid allegations that the government hasn't quite sent out a strong message yet with no official protest registered with the US by the government, the Prime Minister issued a statement today. According to PTI, Manmohan Singh slammed the US for ill-treating the deputy consul. "Treatment meted out to Indian Deputy Consul General by US is is deplorable," he has said.

1.13 pm: US Marshals justify 'search procedure' Devyani was subjected to

The US Marshals Service (USMS) has justified the "search procedure" of Devyani Khobragade, India's deputy consul general in New York, saying it found that her detention was in accordance with their directives and protocols.

The USMS also confirmed that the ranking Indian diplomat was subject to the "same search procedures" as other "arrestees held within the general prisoner population".

The Marshals said in a statement that they had nothing to do with the Dec 12 arrest of Khobragade and they were merely following "standard arrestee procedures".

From IANS

12.30 pm: This situation is a conspiracy, says Khurshid

Khurshid has also said that the entire situation is a conspiracy, and that there is a long history to the incident. He says that the domestic maid at the centre of the entire controversy went 'missing' and the entire incident was part of a conspiracy that would allow her to immigrate to the US.

He says that India had already registered an FIR against the domestic help as she wanted to illegally immigrate to the US. He also said that the husband filed complaint with the NYPD of theft of cash, phone, documents against the domestic help earlier, but she had gone 'missing'.

"India had written to NYPD to arrest domestic help so that she can be tried here, but no action was taken", he said, adding that it was in the midst of all this, that the arrest of Devyani was carried out.

Khurshid is also detailing the measures that India is taking against the US in protest at its behaviour in this matter.

This includes directives for US to return diplomatic ID cards and stop diplomatic import clearances. "I don't think that such actions have ever been carried out before", he said to anger from the house, who were falling over each other to tell him that this was also the first time that such an outrageous incident had taken place.

12.25 pm: Khurshid responds, says govt will not led government down 

A lofty Salman Khurshid is now responding in his capacity as Minister of External Affairs.

Today we speak with one voice, let that voice be one single voice. This government will not let you down", he said to the house. We will overcome, we will succeed".

The main concern is to ensure that the dignity of our officer is restored".

11.50 am: Kanimozhi, RJD, Shiv Sena also call for 'tough stand'

As the debate continues, representatives from various parties including the Shiv Sena and DMK have all said their piece, all talking about India's 'weak kneed' foreign policy, especially when it came to the US.

They are all asking for an 'unqualified apology' and a 'tough stand' on the US by the government.

"The US considers India a subject country", added Atchuthan of the CPI(M) in Kerala. "We must respond in such a way that this is the last incident of this time"

MP after MP is getting up to speak. And everyone is so outraged, that they are willing to forgo the 'other' business of the house so that they can speak beyond the scheduled time limit for the debate.

11:40 am: Don't settle for anything less than apology, SP tells govt

The Samajwadi Party said that the US has insulted Indians on multiple occasions in the past and the government had failed to take action which had resulted in the action against Khobragade.

"This incident has taken place only because in the past we haven't put our view forward properly. When it comes to the US, India seems to suffer an inferiority complex and it is very sad," Ram Gopal Yadav said.

The US should apologise for its conduct and the government should not agree to anything less, he said.

"If this doesn't happen then we should extend the same treatment to their diplomats," Yadav said.

11.27 am:Mayawati creates uproar by bringing caste into Devyani debate

And in such matters of national outrage, BSP leader Mayawati has created more outrage, by accusing the government of taking 'delayed action' into Khobragade's case because she was of a lower caste.

In comments that caused angry outbursts from the gallery, Mayawati said, "She is a Dalit, which is why the government has been delaying on action. Had she been from a different higher caste, they would have acted promptly"

Issues of foreign policy being quite the political hot potato, one would have imagined the Devyani Khobdagade issue would be yet another potent weapon in the Opposition's arsenal. However, with the government taking sweeping measures and a somewhat petulant stand on the issue, getting back at the US diplomats in India quite vengefully, most of the parties in the Opposition didn't have much to chew on. However, trust BSP's Mayawati to find ways to give the issue a local political spin.

As she declared in the RS that the government was hesitant in acting on the issue promptly because the woman was a Dalit and did not belong to a higher caste, she reduced what is an important foreign policy challenge to a vote-grabbing plank that might work wonders among her electorate.

Sitaram Yechury for his part, is now taking a more welcome macro view of the matter, talking strategic relations. He has also welcomed the government measures to take action against the US.

"You have bent backwards to create situations as per their demands. Please understand the depth of how much we have bent backwards to them. Please accept that this incident shows the unoversal values of hypocrisy that the US follows", she said.

11.20 am: We must launch the strongest protest, says Jaitley

Arun Jaitley is tearing into the government's foreign policy, saying that it is time that India takes its bilateral relations seriously, and insist on being treated like equals.

Blaming the government's past policy of 'looking the other way' when it came to foreign policy, Jaitley said that it was this attitude that allowed such incidents to keep happening.

A debate on the incident is currently underway in the Rajya Sabha. "We need to introspect where we stand on foreign policy", Jaitley said, adding that the measures taken over the last 24 hours needed to be continued.

Commerce Minister Anand Sharma then reacted to Jaitley's speech, saying that the government had taken note, and that this was a matter of national outrage.

10.26 am: I broke down many times, says Devyani in email to IFS colleagues

In an email to her IFS colleagues, Devyani Khobragade called on the government to ensure her and her family's safety and preserve the dignity of the IFS, which was "unquestionably under siege", the Times of India reported.

"While I was going through it, although I must admit that I broke down many times as the indignities of repeated handcuffing, stripping and cavity searches, swabbing, in a holdup with common criminals and drug addicts were all being imposed upon me despite my incessant assertions of immunity, I got the strength to regain composure and remain dignified thinking that I must represent all of my colleagues and my country with confidence and pride," she said in her email, the Times of India reported.

10.00 am: US is reviewing arrest of Khobragade, says official

With a furious India taking several steps to make its displeasure of consular official Devyani Khobragade widely known, including asking US diplomats to return their ID cards and removing the barricades from outside the US embassy in New Delhi, new reports coming in say that the US is reviewing the arrest.

State Department deputy spokeswoman Marie Harf acknowledged it was a "sensitive issue", reported the Economic Times.
"Accordingly, we are looking into the intake procedures surrounding this arrest to ensure that all appropriate procedures were followed and every opportunity for courtesy was extended," she said in a statement.



9.45 am: Government to term consular domestic help 'government staff'?

The government is taking steps to ensure that another Khobragade type incident is avoided, by clearing a proposal to give personal staff of Indian diplomats the status of 'government employees', reported the Indian Express.

According to the report, "This would mean that such staff would not be under the labour laws of the respective countries, and their salary bill would be taken care of by the Government of India."

The entire standoff was triggered after the US said that Khobragade had violated visa conditions by paying her nanny significantly less than US minimum wage. It added that personal staff working inside officials homes were protected under US labour laws.

But, the Express report adds, the finance ministry is opposed to the plan as it fears that it may become an open-ended liability. An official pointed out that once the personal staff are made government employees, there is no provision in the service manuals to retrench them.

8.30 am: Embarrassing failure of US protocol, says lawyer

The lawyer representing Debyani Khobragade has said that the entire prosecution represents a significant error in judgement and an embarrassing failure of US international protocol.

Daniel N Arshack expressed hope that the matter would be promptly resolved. He said, "diplomats with authority at the highest levels of the Indian and US governments will confer and conclude that
it is simply not in the mutual interests of our countries to continue with this ill-advised prosecution."

Distressed at the treatment that Khobragade received at the hands of US authorities, Arshack said there was simply no reason to have arrested her on the street in front of her daughter's school nor to have strip searched her.

"Similarly situated individuals of her stature are routinely provided an opportunity to report to the authorities to address charges, at their convenience, instead of being swept off the street like a common criminal," he said.

Speaking to CNN-IBN later, Arshack said, 'Dr Kobragade is strong she is confident that this will resolve soon in an appropriate manner and she appreciates from the bottom of her heart the support that she has received from throughout India as well as from throughout US".

7.45 am: Proper procedure was followed in Devyani's arrest: US

The US Marshals Service (USMS) has confirmed that Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade was subjected to "strip search" after her arrest in New York last week, and subjected to the same search procedures as other arrestees.

"As for the type of search, I can only confirm that she was subject to the same search procedures as other USMS arrestees held within the general prisoner population in the Southern District of New York, which in this case was a strip search," USMS spokesperson Nikki Credic-Barrett said yesterday.

In response to a question on putting the her with drug addicts in the cell, she said: "the arrestee was placed in a cell with other female defendants awaiting court proceedings."

She, however, refused to take any position on her arrest, saying said USMS was not the arresting agency and takes no position regarding the appropriateness of her arrest.

The USMS has reviewed its own detention of arrestee Devyani Khobragade and has determined that the USMS, Southern District of New York handled Khobragade's intake and detention in accordance with USMS Policy Directives and Protocols, she said.

7.00 am: US asks India to respect Vienna convention

The US today appealed to India to uphold the Vienna Convention principles and ensure the safety and security of its diplomats stationed in the country, as New Delhi took a series of steps in response to the arrest and inhuman treatment of its diplomat in New York last week.

"We have conveyed at high levels to the government of India our expectation that India will continue to fulfill all of its obligations under the Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations and consular relations. Obviously the safety and security of our diplomats and consular officers in the field is a top priority," the State Department Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf told reporters at her daily news conference.

"We'll continue to work with India to ensure that all of our diplomats and consular officers are being afforded full rights and protections. Safety and security of our facilities as well is something we take very seriously, and we'll keep working with the Indians on that," she said.

Harf was responding to questions about the withdrawal of certain privileges given by India to US diplomats in the country after the arrest and the alleged inhuman treatment of Devyani Khobragade. The Indian government was informed about the allegations of visa fraud

-- end of updates for 17 December --

9:45 pm: Khobragade put through strip and cavity search like criminals by US

Senior Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade, arrested in New York on charges of visa fraud, was put through both strip and cavity searches, procedures normally used for criminals.

The 39-year-old deputy Consul General in New York, after being arrested and handcuffed in public while dropping her daughter to school on Thursday, was detained with sex workers and drug addicts, sources said.

7.04 pm: Twitter divided over India's reaction on Devyani Khobragade

While India may have taken strict action on how Devyani Khobrage was treated, many on Twitter have questioned why the maid was underpaid.

The twitterati, while suggesting that India was over reacting, were of the opinion that probably the diplomat does deserve to be pulled up, if not in the way the US has gone about it.

Here are some reactions:

 

 

 

 

However there were many who did support India's reaction and also thought that what the US did to her was not correct.

 

 

Meanwhile, this tweet was also making rounds of Twitter, poking fun at the whole incident and revealing the typical Indian mindset.

 

5.23 pm: India demands unconditional apology from US

After taking a number of measure to show its displeasure over the treatment of Devyani Khobragade in New York, India has also demanded unconditional apology from US over the diplomat's humiliation.

4.41 pm: Delhi police remove barricades outside US embassy

After a direction from the the government, the Delhi police has removed barricades outside the US embassy in Delhi.

Such measures were taken to express India's displeasure over the treatment meted out to Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade in New York.

Times Now reportes that the highest ranks of the Delhi police officers are present for the exercise.

3. 20 pm: My daughter's arrest is a conspiracy, says Devyani Khobragade's father

After meeting Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde, Diplomat Devyani Khobragade's father says his daughter's arrest in the US 'is a total conspiracy.'

Earlier, he had said that the Home Minister has assured him that the Indian government will pursue US government to drop charges against Devyani.

2. 55 pm: India asks for details of salaries paid to domestic help

The row over diplomat Devyani Khobragade's arrest has intensified further.  India has now asked for details of salaries paid to domestic help, gardener and other Indian staff in US consulates.

The Indian government has also asked US officials to remove barricades outside the Delhi embassy. India has also stopped all import clearances for US embassy including food, liquor. According to PTI reports, government has also asked for visa and other details of all teachers at US schools.

 

 

2. 50 pm: Arrest same sex companions of US diplomats in India, says Yashwant Sinha

According to NDTV report,  the Indian government has withdrawn airport passes for US consulates and embassies.

Meanwhile,  Senior BJP leader Yashwant Sinha has raised eyebrows with a comment that after the arrest and alleged mistreatment of diplomat Devyani Khobragade in the US, India should reciprocate by arresting the same sex companions of American diplomats using a Supreme Court verdict that restored a ban on gay sex last week.

"My suggestion to the Government of India is, the media has reported that we have issued visas to a number of US diplomats' companions. 'Companions' means that they are of the same sex. Now, after the Supreme Court ruling, it is completely illegal in our country. Just as paying less wages was illegal in the US. So, why doesn't the government of India go ahead and arrest all of them? Put them behind bars, prosecute them in this country and punish them," Sinha said.

1. 30 pm: Govt has assured me full support, says Indian diplomat's father

"The Indian government has assured me full support," the Indian diplomat's father Uttam Khobragade told reporters after meeting Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde.

He said that the Home Minister has assured him that the Indian government will pursue US government to drop charges against Devyani.

Khobragade's father had earlier said that that his daughter is being made "a scapegoat" and asked UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi to intervene to get his daughter back. "It is the government who has send my daughter. It is a political issue between these two countries and my daughter is being made a scapegoat," Devyani's father Uttam Khobragade had said.

1. 15 pm: Salman Khurshid says level of indignity is unacceptable 

Addressing a press conference, External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid termed the arrest of Indian diplomat in a 'barbaric' way as unacceptable.

"We feel an extreme level of distress. This is completely unacceptable. Whatever needs to be is being done. We have put in motion of what we believe will address the issue."

"Have communicated our dissent to the US. I can assure you that we will take this very seriously," Khurshid told reporters.

1. 00 pm:  Turn in your IDs, India tells US diplomats as row escalate

Angry over the "despicable" and "barbaric" treatment meted out to its diplomat, India Tuesday asked US diplomats to turn in their IDs even as Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi and union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde declined to meet a visiting US Congressional delegation.

11. 55 am: Rahul, Shinde refuse to meet US Congressional delegation

Adopting a tough stand, Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi, Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde and Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday refused to meet a visiting US congressional delegation to show India's displeasure over the treatment meted out to Devyani Khobragade, India's deputy consul general in New York.

According to reports, all ministers have been asked to not meet with US ministerial panel to protest the diplomat's arrest.

 

The diplomatic snub comes a day after Lok Sabha Speaker Meira Kumar and National Security Advisor Shivshankar Menon cancelled their meetings separately with the visiting US delegation.

The NSA is known to have described the treatment meted out to Devyani Khobragade, India's deputy consul general in New York, as "despicable" and "barbaric", a source told IANS.

Khobragade was strip searched, confined in a cell with drug addicts and also subjected to DNA swabbing, sources confirmed to IANS.

]Khobragade's arrest raises many questions. PTIKhobragade's arrest raises many questions. PTI
Speaker Meira Kumar, herself a former Indian diplomat, declined to meet the US delegation, comprising Republican and Democrat members, "as a sign of displeasure" over the treatment meted out Khobragade.

Khobragade, one of India's senior diplomats in New York, was charged last week with visa fraud and making false statements.

She was accused by Manhattan's Indian American US Attorney Preet Bharara of visa fraud and exploiting her babysitter and housekeeper. She was handcuffed in public by law enforcement authorities in New York Thursday while she was dropping her daughter at school.

India has termed the treatment meted out to the envoy as "absolutely unacceptable". US Ambassador Nancy Powell was summoned to South Block by Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh Dec 13 and a strong protest lodged over the treatment.

11.30 pm: Khobragade named in housing scam too?

Last year, Khobragade reportedly was one of 15 Indian officials named in an alleged housing scam. She reportedly testified before a judicial panel investigating how she and other people with influence obtained apartments in a new Mumbai co-op built by the government, reports NY Daily News.

11. 20 am: US says standard procedures followed on diplomat Devyani

India's deputy consul general in New York, the US State Department sought to pass the buck to the justice department and the local police.

"The State Department's Diplomatic Security followed standard procedures during the arrest," spokesperson Marie Harf told reporters on Monday when asked why the US was not respecting basic courtesies to a diplomat as it expected others to respect its own diplomats.

"After her arrest, she was passed on to the US marshals for intake and processing. So for any additional questions on her treatment, obviously, this would be the US Marshals and not us. I would refer you there," she said.

11. 10 am: Diplomat Devyani strip-searched, India snubs US team

India's deputy consul general in New York Devyani Khobragade was strip-searched and confined with drug addicts after her detention in a visa fraud case. She was also subjected to DNA swabbing.

On Monday, India retaliated against the US for the humiliation of diplomat with Speaker Meira Kumar and NSA Shivshankar Menon refusing to meet a Congressional delegation on Monday.

Sources confirmed that the government made it a point to convey to the delegation that the Speaker was not going to receive them because she had been deeply troubled by the manner in which Khobragade, who is accused of visa fraud, had been dealt with by the US authorities.

India has been deeply offended by the manner in which Khobragade was treated by the US authorities who chose to ignore her status as a middle-level diplomat from a friendly country. It has continued to emphasize before the state department that the treatment meted out to Khobragade was in complete violation of Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR).

Rare earths, global supply chain. SoniaG UPA, protect every grain of placer sands. Reserve thorium reserves for IOC thorium-based nuclear energy.

$
0
0
Rare earths, global supply chain. SoniaG UPA, protect every grain of placer sands. Reserve thorium reserves for IOC thorium-based nuclear energy.

Scrap the 20 Jan. 2006 notification of DAE opening up rare earths including Atomic Minerals under OGL. India is the repository of the major portion of world reserves of thorium-containing atomic minerals like monazite. This treasure should be safeguarded under the Nuclear Supplier Group regulations and used for a thorium-based nuclear energy program.

Is SoniaG UPA listening?

Kalyanaraman

<font size='2'><a href='http://www.docstoc.com//docs/165712148/rareearthsglobalsupplychain>rareearthsglobalsupplychain</a><a href='http://www.docstoc.com/docs/165712148/rareearthsglobalsupplychain?key=undefined&pass=undefined'>rareearthsglobalsupplychain</a></font><br/><object id='_ds_165712148'name='_ds_165712148' width='630'height='550' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' data='http://viewer.docstoc.com/'><param name='FlashVars'value='doc_id=165712148&mem_id=undefined&doc_type=1&fullscreen=1&allowdownload=1' /><param name='movie' value='http://viewer.docstoc.com/'/><param name='allowScriptAccess' value='always' /><param name='allowFullScreen' value='true' /></object><br /><script type='text/javascript'>var docstoc_docid='165712148'; var docstoc_title='rareearthsglobalsupplychain'; var docstoc_urltitle='rareearthsglobalsupplychain';</script><script type='text/javascript' src='http://i.docstoccdn.com/js/check-flash.js'></script>

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=165712148&key=undefined&pass=undefined

The final solution against Hindus -- Gautam Sen

$
0
0

THE FINAL SOLUTION AGAINST HINDUS

Posted by Gautam Sen  /   December 18, 2013  /   
conversions
In the centuries to come, Adolf Hitler is likely to be anointed a Saint. In common with other Christian mass murderers like the conquistador Francis Xavier, the subjugator of Goa, Hitler too accomplished a cherished historic goal of Christianity. He destroyed the enemies of Christ the Saviour without mercy although he sought familiar secular goals as well. Christian rulers never shied away from genocide, as Charlemagne, the early ninth century Holy Roman Emperor, demonstrated by killing heathens en masse. His reign is revered as the origin of Europe, inspiring both Adolf Hitler and the founders of the European Union.  Supreme Christian ideologues like Thomas Aquinas and Martin Luther also affirmed their support for torture and execution of unbelievers, always in the name of the Divine!
For countless centuries the elimination of Jewry had been earnestly sought and attempted in constant pogroms of shocking bloodlust. Adolf Hitler deployed scientific methods to pretty much wipe out European Jewry outside Russia, although it is that country, where Jews survived, which has been routinely accused of anti-Semitism. The Christian celebration of Hitler’s celestial achievement has had to be deferred because his unspeakably brutal methods provoked horror in the wider world, but, it may be surmised, church leaders and the devout quietly breathed a sigh of relief.
The supposed ‘murderers of Christ’ and enemies of the only faith had been dealt a blow of severity that curtailed their perceived poisonous presence in the midst of Europe’s Christian communities. In addition to the religious and mythological basis of Christian hatred of Judaism, its enormous intellectual prowess and footprint were regarded as a serious threat to Christian ideological ascendancy. Jewish fidelity to learning and intellectual traditions only grew stronger in the face of relentless oppression, the community surviving by cultivating the sacred word, when all else seemed to falter. It is a poignant echo of the survival of Hindus through the oral traditions of countless generations of Brahmins who passed on scriptural knowledge to their descendants even as they suffered mercilessly at the hands of barbarian iconoclasts.
The physical liquidation of European Jews was followed by their effective banishment to an unenviable Middle Eastern location.  Jews may have felt they had no choice in the aftermath of the holocaust, but they have been placed in situation of permanent war, where their survival is not guaranteed. Tragically, a gifted community, whose intellectual and aesthetic attainments are without parallel, has been transformed into modern Spartans. Only the ability to fight wars is what ultimately counts for a Jew because survival must take priority over other goals. The apparent influence of the US Jewish lobby is a paradoxical confirmation of the plight of the Jewish people, obliged to defend a homeland under permanent siege and an existential situation inimical to the integrity of the intellectual and spiritual traditions of Judaism.
Hindus and their spiritual and intellectual purveyors, Brahmins, are the other community sullenly detested by Christianity. This is the one other group that poses a serious ideological challenge, with a radically alternative perspective to the Christian worldview, which has been its enduring camouflage for white European world domination.  The physical liquidation of Brahmins, considered the key to the survival of Hinduism as a faith, is judged unnecessary because the destruction of their spiritual and religious integrity will apparently suffice to subdue them. As a prelude, determined and successful efforts have been made to divide Hindus along caste axes within India itself. Once Indian caste identities were distorted and deepened by British officials in the nineteenth century, it became feasible to engage in massive political intervention within Indian society itself.
The strategy adopted, to which all Christian denominations have since adhered unwaveringly over time, is to portray Hinduism as purely a vehicle for oppression by the upper castes, especially Brahmins. They equate Hinduism with caste alone and successfully portrayed it as a form of egregious racial oppression, akin to apartheid that cannot be tolerated. In the past few months, huge strides have been taken by church lobbyists in Europe and the UK to ensure official condemnation of caste as a form of oppression, the subtext identifying it with racism. Some Hindu groups in the US and the UK, (not least HAF’s damaging and uninformed Caste report) have unintentionally, or perhaps even knowingly, abetted this diabolical conspiracy by mea culpa hyperventilation about supposed caste crimes.
It is a cause of profound dismay that Anglicised and Americanised Hindus are collaborators in the unfolding drama of their own annihilation. Even ostensible Hindu office bearers of the Sangh in the UK and US are apt to introduce themselves as interfaith dialogue practitioners rather than nurturers and defenders of Hinduism.  Their desire to engage with Christians and their churches is evidently unstoppable and animus towards anyone who dissents, intense. Some Hindu groups even allowed the Anglican Church hierarchy, in the UK for example, to select Hindu interlocutors for their mutual dialogue. It means only Hindus whom the Church finds agreeable have access to public platforms. Of course acquiescence to the preferences of Christian groups assures formal recognition from the governmental authorities and access to financial assistance.
The incitement of Hindus against each other by church organisations and other arms length institutions like Christian educational establishments in India, has been well entrenched for over two hundred years. Church organisations and their political patrons, US governmental agencies in particular, are active in many parts of India, from Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh to Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. Their cloak is the fiction of charitable works and succour for the poor, even as they preside over millions of deaths elsewhere! Maharashtra was witness to murderous pogroms against Brahmins in the wake of Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination, in which the church played a discreet inflammatory role. Nagaland and Mizoram were basically gifts made by Nehru to the global church and the US, in part, because he wanted to project himself as a liberal, world statesman  in the mould of Woodrow Wilson rather than a mere native politician.
The prodigious funding required to sponsor robust Christian evangelical movements across India has been readily available, from foreign intelligence services, church organisations and myriad charitable fronts controlled by either. Subversion in India is coordinated between Christian churches, foreign governments and other institutions like the Ford Foundation. Anybody with a significant public profile in India usually becomes a recipient of Ford or Rockefeller largesse.
Scandinavian US satellites have also become increasingly active in Christian evangelical activities because they are viewed as innocuous despite their transparent Nazi past. German church organisations are involved as well and all of them are currently engaged in a massive Christian evangelical drive in Nepal. Bribed local politicians of all political parties are in the pockets of these organisations and the Maoist leadership is actually Christian and the Maoist label merely a cover to facilitate religious conversion. They aim to turn Nepal into a Nagaland adjacent to the Chinese border, the only land access the US can acquire easily.
The Christian church and their Western patrons do not expect to convert a majority of India’s people in a short span of time. They are working patiently to convert sufficient numbers in strategic locations, in different parts of India, to acquire an electoral veto. Despite determined efforts at concealment of census evidence, it seems likely that Christians already comprise 8% of India’s population. They surely dream of the 60% conversion to Christianity achieved within a generation in the Republic of Korea, but would be happy to settle for an interim 15% in India. It would give them a veto, in conjunction with the Muslim vote bank, over Indian parliamentary politics and foreign policy.
They see Muslims as imperative temporary allies, which accounts for the campaigns against Narendra Modi, especially over the US visa issue. But the Christian church is confident that Muslims will have less success than them in getting Hindus to convert voluntarily when personal and professional pressures make life as a Hindu intolerable. They justly have grounds for optimism because, with their relatively modest existing foothold, they have already seized effective control of India’s fate through a mere former waitress. She is likely to ascend to sainthood alongside Adolf Hitler, for her services to Christ the Lord, although her fascist late father will probably be smiling from his afterlife vantage point.
In the estimate of Christian organisations, Hindu political influence has been expunged from Tamil Nadu and Kerala completely and Andhra Pradesh, where religious conversions have surged, will almost certainly follow. They rightly judge an Anglicised, secular West Bengal polity as instinctively anti-Hindu and subliminally sympathetic to Christianity although it is wrapped in a bogus secular guise. They rejoice in total control over the strategic locations of Nagaland and the Mizoram, whose importance exceeds their territory and population size and expect Arunachal Pradesh to succumb to Christian blandishment, which means bribery and blackmail.
This political goal of subverting India from within was adopted more than sixty years ago by Anglo American Governments, keen to deploy Indian manpower and resources in Cold war ventures. It has taken a while to come within striking distance of this historic aim though the Cold War, if not their grand imperial aspirations, has waned. In the meantime, Christian leaders quietly celebrate the ferocity with which former Hindus, especially of high caste background, loathe all things polytheist and Hindu.  They also note with satisfaction that the grandparents of the foremost Muslim intellectual of the twentieth century, who abhorred idolatry, were Kashmiri Brahmins. They do not see the need to physically eliminate a majority of Brahmins because their skills will be useful for imperial rule, once they have succumbed to ruthless machinations.
Dr Gautam Sen taught international political economy Political Science at the London School of Economics.

http://www.indiafacts.co.in/the-final-solution-against-hindus/

Khobragade affair. Kerry regrets 'events after arrest' -- Charu Sudan Kasturi, KP Nayar, Indira Kannan (Toronto)

$
0
0

Devyani Khobragade case: Official tale reveals intriguing inaction

Saurabh Shukla   |   Mail Today  |   New Delhi, December 19, 2013 | UPDATED 05:04 IST
Devyani Khobragade
The Devyani Khobragade controversy is not just about the provocative arrest of a senior Indian diplomat.

Highly placed sources have told MAIL TODAY that Sangeeta Richard, the maid at the centre of the controversy, was previously employed by a senior US diplomat. Another intriguing part of the unfolding story is that a visa was issued to Richard family-Sangeeta's husband Philip and their two children-and they left the country by an Air India flight on December 10, even as New Delhi was engaging with Washington on the issue.

A MAIL TODAY investigation has revealed how the saga unfolded, with the Indian Deputy Consul General finding it difficult even to lodge a missing persons report for Sangeeta Richard with the New York Police Department (NYPD), and how the US ignored India's plea for action against Richard and instead piled pressure on India. MAIL TODAY has accessed official documents to weave the story together. This is how it all went down:

NOVEMBER 2012: Sangeeta Richard enters the United States with Deputy Consul General Devyani Khobragade.

JUNE 23, 2013: Richard goes missing. In Delhi, her husband says he has no idea where she is. Richard had some days earlier sought Khobragade's permission to take up another part-time job in New York; it was denied.

JUNE 24, 2013: Office of Foreign Missions (OFM) in New York informed, and its help requested in tracing Richard.

An intriguing part of the story is how difficult it became for Khobragade to file a Missing Persons Report with the NYPD. It was on the advice of the OFM, Khobragade went to file a missing person report at the police precinct concerned, but was told that she could not since Richard was an adult, and that such a report could only be lodged by a member of her family.

When Mr Richard, Sangeeta's husband, was contacted, he refused to file a Missing Person Report, indicating his awareness of something being amiss.

JUNE 25, 2013: Unable to file a report, Devyani sends a letter to the police precinct concerned, requesting them to file a missing person report and trace Richard. Sustained efforts resulted in the NYPD seeking inspection of Khobragade's residence. As diplomatic premises are out of bounds for local law enforcement agencies, Khobragade was interviewed in front of the Permanent Mission of India, her residence, and a missing person report filed by the NYPD.

JULY 1, 2013: A woman claiming to be the Richard's lawyer calls Khobragade to tell her that Sangeeta would not go to court only if, one, the Indian diplomat signs a 566 form authorising the maid to terminate her employment, and, two, change her visa status from government visa to normal visa, and, three, be compensated for 19 hours of work per day. Khobragade refuses to negotiate on phone, insisting that the caller first identify herself; the caller hangs up.

JULY 2, 2013: Khobragade informs the OFM about these developments in writing, seeking NYPD support in ascertaining the identity of the caller and her links with Richard, given that the conversations clearly indicate that the runaway maid has no intention of returning to India and seems keen to extort money by making false accusations. No action is taken.

Khobragade files a written complaint with the Delhi Police against Sangeeta Richard and her husband Philip Richard, accusing them of cheating under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, and asking the police to book them for the offence and recover the maidÂ?fs official passport.

JULY 5, 2013: Khobragade files complaint of agaggravated harassment with respect to the phone call received on July 1 for extortion and blackmail. No action taken by NYPD.

Michael Phillips, Director (Human Resources) at the US embassy in New Delhi, is called by senior MEA official and briefed about missing maid, reports filed with the US State Department and NYPD, and the FIR filed in India against Sangeeta Richard. The assistance of the State Department and US Embassy is emphatically solicited in locating the maid and sending her back to India to pre-empt this being used as an immigration channel.

The US Embassy conveys its understanding and promises to follow-up with the State Department and local authorities. No feedback is received IndiaÂ?fs requests, however. Similar requests were made by the Indian Embassy in Washington D.C. to the State Department in Washington D.C.

Lack of cooperation by Philip Richard prompts Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) to advise Khobragade on filing a First Information Report in Delhi against the Richard family for wilful deceit and attempt to cheat to illegally immigrate to the US by wrongful means.

Based on the MEAÂ?fs advice, Khobragade also filed for an anticipatory anti-suit injunction in the Delhi High Court so as to prevent filing of any case in the US by Richard to avoid ensuing litigation in the US.

JULY 8, 2013: Khobragade is called to 'Access Immigration', an immigration lawyer's office, to discuss terms of settlement with Richard. Accompanied by the consulate officers, Khobragade meets Richard whose seeks payment of $10,000, grant of an ordinary Indian passport along with whatever immigration relief is required to stay on in the US on that ordinary passport.

Consulate officials tell Richard that she cannot remain in the US under any circumstances without legal authorisation, and that she should return to India as per her contract with Khobragade. Richard is told that any argument over salary or working hours could be settled in the consulate before her return to India. Richard refuses, saying that she wants to remain in the US. Khobragade complains to the NYPD about the demands, but there is no response.

Richard's passport is revoked and notice for termination of her personal identity also given to OFM with effect from June 22, 2013. Richard is now staying illegally in the US.

Felony / theft charge filed with NYPD against Richard by KhobragadeÂ?fs husband, reporting theft of cash, Blackberry phone, two SIM cards, a metro card (valued at $113) and documents such as contracts, signed receipt book-cum-working hour log. No action taken.

JULY 15 & 19, 2013: Philip Richard filed a writ petition against Khobragade and the Union of India, alleging that his wife Sangeeta Richard was in police custody in New York since July 8, 2013, charging the Indian diplomat with 'slave labour'and illegally making Sangeeta sign a 'second contract' with far less pay and perks. The Union of India is accused of not paying according to the requirements of the local law. Richard withdraws his writ petition four days later.

JULY 30, 2013: A copy of Philip Richard's writ petition is forwarded to OFM, which states that Sangeeta is in police custody in New York, for producing the maid at the Consulate so she can be repatriated to India as requested by her husband in his writ petition. Consul General is also informed that Richard was last seen at the office of Access Immigration on July 8, 2013. No action taken by the US.

SEPTEMBER 4, 2013: US State Department issues a one-sided letter to the Indian Ambassador, projecting the allegations of the maid which are of considerable concern, and asking for the allegations to be probed. It also seeks a voluntary meeting between Khobragade and the Bureau of Diplomatic Security in the State Department as well as proof of payment of minimum wages from the embassy.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2013: In Delhi, MEA calls US officials and strongly protests against the tone and content of the letter.

SEPTEMBER 20, 2013: Delhi High Court issues an ex-parte ad interim injunction against Philip and Sangeeta Richard, restraining them from initiating any legal action or proceedings against Khobragade in any Court / Tribunal / Forum outside India with regard to her employment. The final hearing in the matter is scheduled December 13, 2013.

SEPTEMBER 21, 2013: A reply is sent to the State Department by the Indian Embassy in Washington, rebutting the allegations and bringing out the facts of the case while highlighting the fact that Sangeeta Richard is seeking monetary settlement and a US visa, thereby seeking to subvert both Indian and US laws. The letter also emphasises that the matter is an issue between the Government of India and one of its employees and is not subject to US regulation or adjudication. Assistance of the State Department is sought in locating and repatriating Sangeeta Richard to India.

NOVEMBER 19, 2013: Metropolitan Magistrate of South District, New Delhi, issues a nonbailable arrest warrant against Sangeeta Richard.

DECEMBER 6, 2013:The arrest warrant issued by the Delhi Metropolitan court is forwarded to the US State Department and the US Embassy in New Delhi, requesting them to instruct the relevant authorities in the US to arrest and repatriate Sangeeta Richard to India through the Consulate in New York, so that due process of law may be prosecuted in India. No action is taken by the US.

DECEMBER 12, 2013: Khobragade arrested on the basis of a Second District court warrant for visa fraud as she drops her daughter to school in New York. Immunity is denied under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) for this "felony charge" Bail posted at $250,000, Khobragade's passport is seized, and she is asked not to leave the country or seek another travel document though she can travel within the US after notifying authorities. She is been not to be in touch with Sangeeta Richard.

JANUARY 13, 2014: Next date of hearing is announced, but Khobragade's attorney claims he is not free that day and is negotiating another date, which will be known in due course. Pre-trial process commenced on December 16, 2013 where a urine sample was taken by US authorities for drugs testing.

US says Indian govt knew all about the case
The United States had informed the Indian government about the allegations against Devyani Khobragade, the Deputy Consul General in New York, over three months prior to her arrest last week.

A State Department official told Mail Today, "To confirm, the State Department notified the Indian Embassy in writing on September 4. The Department of State advised the Embassy of the Republic of India of allegations of abuse made by an Indian national against the Deputy Consul General of India in New York."

This refers to the allegations by Khobragade's former housekeeper and babysitter, who the US Attorney's office in New York has charged was brought in to the US on the basis of fraudulent information given by the Indian diplomat and then paid less than the amount specified in her contract as well as minimum wages in America.

The State Department said the notification sent to the embassy was part of official procedure and the department's policy of advising foreign missions of allegations made involving a member of a mission or a family member.

Officials at the Indian Embassy in Washington, DC could not be reached to comment on what, if any, action was taken by the Indian government upon receipt of the notification from the State Department.

The State Department has clarified Khobragade has consular immunity, which applied only to functions performed in line with her official duties and not to alleged crimes such as visa fraud. She does not have diplomatic immunity, which applies across the board.With the Indian government now reportedly moving to obtain diplomatic immunity for Khobragade, the disclosure of the State Department's prior notification could raise the question as why Indian officials did not anticipate possible action against their diplomat and take action to provide her with diplomatic immunity earlier if they were convinced there was no wrongdoing on her part.

On December 5, 25 current and former Russian diplomats in New York and their spouses were charged with defrauding Medicaid, a state-run healthcare program, but none was arrested or prosecuted as the US said they enjoyed diplomatic immunity.  

By- Indira Kannan in Toronto

Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/devyani-khobragade-case-visa-issue-indian-diplomat-arrest/1/331838.html

Kerry regrets ‘events after arrest’
India alleges conspiracy

New Delhi, Dec. 18: US secretary of state John Kerry today called the Indian national security adviser to voice regret while referring to the “events that unfolded” after a diplomat was arrested in New York last week.
“As a father of two daughters about the same age as Devyani Khobragade, the secretary empathises with the sensitivities we are hearing from India about the events that unfolded after Ms. Khobragade’s arrest,” state department spokesperson Marie Harf said in a statement.
“In his conversation with national security adviser (Shivshankar) Menon, he expressed his regret, as well as his concern that we not allow this unfortunate public issue to hurt our close and vital relationship with India,” Harf added.
By “events that unfolded after the arrest”, Kerry appeared to be referring to the strip search of Devyani after she was arrested.
Kerry said it is “particularly important” that foreign diplomats serving in the US are accorded respect and dignity “just as we expect our own diplomats should receive overseas”, according to the statement.
But the state department added: “The secretary understands very deeply the importance of enforcing our laws and protecting victims, and, like all officials in positions of responsibility inside the US government, expects that laws will be followed by everyone here in our country.”
Kerry’s call capped a day on which India accused the US of conspiring with a nanny in her allegations that Devyani committed visa fraud.
Officials in Delhi pointed to a series of meetings where India informed the US of its concerns that the nanny, Sangeeta Richard, and her husband were trying to extort money from Devyani, and questioned why America still issued visas that allowed the entire Richard family to flee India. (See chart)
Richard’s husband Philip and their children flew to the US on December 10, two days before Devyani’s arrest, despite an FIR registered against him by Delhi police.
“There was a conspiracy in which the deputy consul-general was virtually trapped,” external affairs minister Salman Khurshid told an enraged Parliament. “We will bring back the woman diplomat arrested in New York and restore her dignity.”
Devyani, who was arrested on the morning of December 12, was on Wednesday moved by India from her post as deputy consul-general in New York to India’s permanent mission at the United Nations, streets away in Manhattan.
The move is aimed at shielding her from any fresh attempt at an arrest since diplomats posted at the UN enjoy higher immunity from domestic laws.
But no Indian official would comment on any specific motives that could drive an American conspiracy against India.
New Delhi’s defence remains restricted to the way Devyani was treated, rather than an unambiguous challenge to allegations of a mismatch between the salary promised to the nanny and that was eventually paid.
Officials here have said Indian nannies and household help — called India-based domestic assistants or IBDAs — receive free housing, food, the same medical facilities accessible to diplomats and a trip back to India each year in addition to the cheques deposited in their bank accounts. India contends that these benefits, if monetised, would be far higher than the minimum wage in New York and closer to the figure usually cited in visa documents.
Any legal victory for US attorney Preet Bharara, who has listed the charges against Devyani, will set a precedent that could expose multiple present and future Indian diplomats to similar allegations.
Indian officials said that unlike most other earlier instances, Devyani has been accused not by individual NGOs but by the US federal government.
This, India is suggesting, points to the complicity of the US government with the nanny and a “human rights lobby” that New Delhi has long believed tries to entrap developing nations while ignoring alleged rights violations by the US itself.
But Indian officials have not explained one factor: the reason for a US court rejecting an attempt to file an extortion case against Sangeeta.
INDIAN VERSION
The sequence of events, according to Indian officials
June 23, 2013: Sangeeta Richard, the nanny, leaves the Manhattan home of Devyani Khobragade
June 24: India informs US officials in New York. From then till early July, Devyani receives multiple calls from people claiming to represent Sangeeta, threatening harassment unless she is compensated. India cancels Sangeeta’s official passport
July 5: India summons American officials to South Block to discuss the issue
July 8: Sangeeta and Devyani — along with other consulate officials — meet at a Manhattan immigration attorney’s office, where the nanny allegedly demands $10,000 (Rs 6.2 lakh), an ordinary Indian passport and a clean chit. Devyani and the others refuse
End-July: Devyani and her husband try to file a case in a New York court accusing Sangeeta of extortion but their petition is rejected. (Indian officials did not list the specific reason behind the rejection)
Sept. 17: Sangeeta’s husband Philip and their two children get Indian passports. Indian officials say they did not, at that point, suspect the family was involved in fraud
Sept. 21: Delhi High Court passes an injunction barring Sangeeta from filing any criminal or civil charges against Devyani outside India. The US is told — in New Delhi and in Washington
October: Devyani’s family files an FIR against Sangeeta and Philip Richard in south Delhi, accusing the nanny of extortion and naming Philip as a “co-conspirator”
November: A Delhi court issues a non-bailable warrant against Sangeeta. The US is informed
Dec. 10: Philip and their children fly to the US. The FIR doesn’t stop them from flying out — there was no arrest warrant. But the US knew about the FIR. Its visa form specifically asks about pending cases and almost never gives visas in such cases
Dec. 12: Devyani is arrested in New York

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1131219/jsp/frontpage/story_17697415.jsp

Searing but laid down by court

Washington, Dec. 18: Diplomat Devyani Khobragade’s strip search, which has caused consternation in India, is a post-arrest procedure that is sanctioned in the US by its highest court.
One-and-a-half years ago, after the controversial, often humiliating, practice was challenged at various levels of the American justice system, the matter had reached the US Supreme Court, which pronounced its final decision on those legal challenges.
“Every detainee who will be admitted to the general (incarcerated) population may be required to undergo a close visual inspection while undressed,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority of five judges on the bench.
In a dissent note for the minority of four judges, Justice Stephen Breyer described strip searches as “a serious affront to human dignity and to individual privacy”.
Expressing views that would find an echo in India after its deputy consul-general in New York was a victim of strip search following her arrest, these four dissenting justices had opined that such intrusive procedures should be used only when there was good reason to do so.
Justice Breyer interpreted the Fourth Amendment to the American Constitution against unreasonable searches as prohibiting strip searches of those detained for minor offences not involving drugs or violence. In instances where there was reason to suspect that detainees were carrying contraband, the minority was also in favour of intrusive searches.
The US has the biggest prison population in the world: 13 million. The majority of Supreme Court judges argued that officials with detainees in their custody had to ensure that people who are arrested or sentenced do not smuggle weapons or drugs into facilities where they are held.
In America, which has a large homeless population, admission to homeless shelters is preceded by a strip search and a bath for reasons of public health and hygiene.
In such facilities and in many detention centres, those brought in like Khobragade are asked to hand over their clothing and have a bath in order to make the stripping appear less intrusive.
The case that elevated strip search to the highest court of the land had shades of the Indian diplomat’s treatment. In 2005, Albert Florence was travelling in New Jersey in the passenger seat of a BMW when the police flagged down his car for speeding.
A dispute ensued with police citing a pending arrest warrant for Florence even as he insisted that he had paid a fine which triggered the warrant. In the end it turned out that the fine had, indeed, been paid by the accused. Florence spent the next week in two jails where he was strip-searched twice.
According to the detainee’s account of the search, he was shorn of all clothes and made to turn around, squat, cough and spread the cheeks of his buttocks while an officer watched. “It was humiliating,” he later said of the experience.
Even though the Supreme Court approved of strip searches in minor offences like speeding, riding a bicycle without a bell or driving without a licence, the issue continues to be controversial in America. In at least 10 states, intrusive searches are banned by law unless there is sufficient justification to warrant it.
New York, where the Indian diplomat was arrested, is not one of those states. There, strip searches take place after prisoners are visited by outsiders in jails or detention centres. During anti-Iraq war demonstrations, a nun was strip-searched for crossing a police barricade to block the demonstrators although she was not a protester.
Such searches may, however, be counterproductive. Justice Breyer cited a study of 23,000 detainees in Orange County, New York, where only one case of contraband was detected during intrusive searches.
Illinois is one of the states that prohibit strip-searches unless there is reasonable justification to warrant one. Its law details what constitutes a strip search. “Strip search means having an arrested person remove or arrange some or all of his or her clothing so as to permit a visual inspection…,” according to its statute.
In New York, DNA samples are also routinely taken after an arrest and fed into a law enforcement database. This would have been done in the case of the Indian diplomat.
The protocol of the US Marshals Service, which strip-searched Khobragade, states that officers must visually inspect the front of the body all the way down. It requires the prisoner to “spread legs and bend forward at the waist” so as to enable observation from the rear.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1131219/jsp/frontpage/story_17697417.jsp

Khobragade affair. US State Dept. complaint of Dec. 11, 2013 (Full text)

$
0
0

http://www.justice.gov/usao/nys/pressreleases/December13/KhobragadeArrestPR/Khobragade,%20Devyani%20Complaint.pdf Full text of US State Dept. complaint of Dec. 11, 2013 against Devyani Khobragade



The Full Allegations Against Indian Diplomat Devyani Khobragade

By WSJ Staff

Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
The U.S. Embassy in New Delhi on Dec. 17.
U.S. authorities say Devyani Khobragade, the Indian diplomat arrested and charged with visa fraud in the U.S., submitted an employment contract to the State Department that she knew contained “materially false and fraudulent statements,” when she applied for a visa for another individual.
U.S. Department of State Bureau of Diplomatic Security Special Agent Mark. J. Smith who led the investigation, alleges Ms. Khobragade caused another individual to make statements that she knew to be false to an employee at the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi, in support of the visa application.
Ms. Khobragade is on bail. Repeated attempts to reach her for comment were unsuccessful.
Her lawyer, Daniel Arshack, said in an  email that his client was “protected from prosecution by virtue of her diplomatic status.”
“This entire prosecution represents a significant error in judgment and an embarrassing failure of US international protocol,” Mr. Arshack said.  “We hope that diplomats with authority  at the highest levels of the Indian and U.S. governments will confer and conclude that it is simply not in the mutual interests of our countries to continue with this ill-advised prosecution.”
The State Department investigator’s statement says that Ms. Khobragade “enjoys limited diplomatic immunity with respect to only those acts undertaken in her official capacity.”
Under international law, consular officers such as Ms. Khobragde, who is deputy consul general for India in New York, have limited immunity and can be arrested in the case of “grave” crimes.
guide for U.S. police on treatment of consular officers and diplomats published by the State Department, notes that the privileges of “personal inviolability” accorded to consular officers is “quite limited.”
Mr. Smith’s statement quotes from the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs website, which says diplomats may obtain visas for their personal employees, domestic workers and servants if they meet certain requirements.
The prospective employees must be interviewed, and have proof that they will “receive a fair wage, sufficient to financially support” themselves and be paid a wage “comparable to that being offered in the area of employment in the U.S.”
Among other stipulations on hours of work, holiday and sick leave, the regulations also make requirements for the minimum wage to be paid to the domestic worker.
“The rate must be the greater of the minimum wage under U.S. Federal and state law or the prevailing wage for all working hours,” the rules say. “The contract must state that wages will be paid to the domestic employee either weekly or biweekly.”
No deductions are allowed for lodging, medical care, medical insurance, or travel. Deductions taken for meals are also no longer allowed.
The investigating officer’s affidavit goes on to say that during a meeting at Ms. Khobragade’s house in Delhi with the prospective domestic worker, Ms. Khobragade agreed to pay 30,000 rupees a month for babysitting and additional household work in New York.
According to the domestic help and her partner, named in the statement as Witness 1 and Witness 2, at a subsequent meeting, Ms. Khobragade agreed to pay the domestic help a starting salary of 25,000 rupees and overtime of 5,000 rupees.
The investigating officer said that at exchange rates at the time, the salary equated to a rate of $3.31 an hour or $573.07 a month.
The visa application form, submitted by Ms. Khobragade, according to the investigator, stated that she would pay the domestic worker $4,500 dollars a month.
The investigating officer went on to record that Ms. Khobragade instructed the domestic worker to tell U.S. Embassy officials that she was being paid $9.50 an hour, and told her not to mention the 30,000 rupee salary.
The statement adds that the diplomat then asked the employee to sign a second employment contract, which stated that she would be paid no more than 30,000 rupees a month, including overtime. The contract did not say anything about working hours, sick pay, time off, or holidays, the investigating officer said, adding that it omitted to state that the employer agreed to abide by federal, state and local laws in the U.S.
Mr. Smith alleges that Ms. Khobragade paid her domestic help less than $3.31 an hour during her employment between Nov. 2012 and June 2013.

Statement Of Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara
On U.S. V. Devyani Khobragade

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
There has been much misinformation and factual inaccuracy in the reporting on the charges against Devyani Khobragade. It is important to correct these inaccuracies because they are misleading people and creating an inflammatory atmosphere on an unfounded basis. Although I am quite limited in my role as a prosecutor in what I can say, which in many ways constrains my ability here to explain the case to the extent I would like, I can nevertheless make sure the public record is clearer than it has been thus far.
First, Ms. Khobragade was charged based on conduct, as is alleged in the Complaint, that shows she clearly tried to evade U.S. law designed to protect from exploitation the domestic employees of diplomats and consular officers. Not only did she try to evade the law, but as further alleged, she caused the victim and her spouse to attest to false documents and be a part of her scheme to lie to U.S. government officials. So it is alleged not merely that she sought to evade the law, but that she affirmatively created false documents and went ahead with lying to the U.S. government about what she was doing. One wonders whether any government would not take action regarding false documents being submitted to it in order to bring immigrants into the country. One wonders even more pointedly whether any government would not take action regarding that alleged conduct where the purpose of the scheme was to unfairly treat a domestic worker in ways that violate the law. And one wonders why there is so much outrage about the alleged treatment of the Indian national accused of perpetrating these acts, but precious little outrage about the alleged treatment of the Indian victim and her spouse?
Second, as the alleged conduct of Ms. Khobragade makes clear, there can be no plausible claim that this case was somehow unexpected or an injustice. Indeed, the law is clearly set forth on the State Department website. Further, there have been other public cases in the United States involving other countries, and some involving India, where the mistreatment of domestic workers by diplomats or consular officers was charged criminally, and there have been civil suits as well. In fact, the Indian government itself has been aware of this legal issue, and that its diplomats and consular officers were at risk of violating the law. The question then may be asked: Is it for U.S. prosecutors to look the other way, ignore the law and the civil rights of victims (again, here an Indian national), or is it the responsibility of the diplomats and consular officers and their government to make sure the law is observed?
Third, Ms. Khobragade, the Deputy General Consul for Political, Economic, Commercial and Women’s Affairs, is alleged to have treated this victim illegally in numerous ways by paying her far below minimum wage, despite her child care responsibilities and many household duties, such that it was not a legal wage. The victim is also alleged to have worked far more than the 40 hours per week she was contracted to work, and which exceeded the maximum hour limit set forth in the visa application. Ms. Khobragade, as the Complaint charges, created a second contract that was not to be revealed to the U.S. government, that changed the amount to be paid to far below minimum wage, deleted the required language protecting the victim from other forms of exploitation and abuse, and also deleted language that stated that Ms. Khobragade agreed to “abide by all Federal, state, and local laws in the U.S.” As the Complaint states, these are only “in part” the facts, and there are other facts regarding the treatment of the victim – that were not consistent with the law or the representations made by Ms. Khobragade -- that caused this Office and the State Department, to take legal action.
Fourth, as to Ms. Khobragade’s arrest by State Department agents, this is a prosecutor’s office in charge of prosecution, not the arrest or custody, of the defendant, and therefore those questions may be better referred to other agencies. I will address these issues based on the facts as I understand them. Ms. Khobragade was accorded courtesies well beyond what other defendants, most of whom are American citizens, are accorded. She was not, as has been incorrectly reported, arrested in front of her children. The agents arrested her in the most discreet way possible, and unlike most defendants, she was not then handcuffed or restrained. In fact, the arresting officers did not even seize her phone as they normally would have. Instead, they offered her the opportunity to make numerous calls to arrange personal matters and contact whomever she needed, including allowing her to arrange for child care. This lasted approximately two hours. Because it was cold outside, the agents let her make those calls from their car and even brought her coffee and offered to get her food. It is true that she was fully searched by a female Deputy Marshal -- in a private setting -- when she was brought into the U.S. Marshals’ custody, but this is standard practice for every defendant, rich or poor, American or not, in order to make sure that no prisoner keeps anything on his person that could harm anyone, including himself. This is in the interests of everyone’s safety.
Fifth, as has been reported, the victim’s family has been brought to the United States. As also has been reported, legal process was started in India against the victim, attempting to silence her, and attempts were made to compel her to return to India. Further, the Victim’s family reportedly was confronted in numerous ways regarding this case. Speculation about why the family was brought here has been rampant and incorrect. Some focus should perhaps be put on why it was necessary to evacuate the family and what actions were taken in India vis-à-vis them. This Office and the Justice Department are compelled to make sure that victims, witnesses and their families are safe and secure while cases are pending.
Finally, this Office’s sole motivation in this case, as in all cases, is to uphold the rule of law, protect victims, and hold accountable anyone who breaks the law – no matter what their societal status and no matter how powerful, rich or connected they are.

'Is he satyawadi Harishchandra?' -- Satyavrat Chaturvedi asks Anna about RahulG. DK Singh reports.

$
0
0

Making peace with political class: The story behind the consensus over Lokpal Bill

D K Singh Posted online: Wed Dec 18 2013, 02:35 hrs
New Delhi : Hours after Rahul Gandhi had come out in support of the Lokpal Bill at Congress headquarters last Saturday, chairman of the Rajya Sabha select committee Satyavrat Chaturvedi got a call from Kiran Bedi in Ralegaon Siddhi. She expressed her appreciation for his committee’s efforts and passed on the phone to Anna Hazare, who too praised the panel’s recommendations.It was a different Anna Hazare from the one who had attacked the government two years ago after the Parliamentary Standing Committee decision to keep the lower bureaucracy out of the Lokpal’s purview. “He (Rahul) must have pressured the committee to keep the lower bureaucracy out,” Hazare had said. Chaturvedi had reacted, “His (Hazare’s) word is not Lord Brahma’s. Is he Satyawadi Harishchandra?”
On Tuesday, as a jubilant Hazare prepared to end his fast after the bill’s expected passage in the Lok Sabha, few in Parliament or Ralegaon Siddhi appeared bothered about the Aam Admi Party’s “Jokepal” jibe. With the political class giving Hazare an opportunity to claim success for his anti-corruption movement, the latter reached out to both principal parties Sunday writing separately to Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley and Rahul Gandhi to welcome their commitment to the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill and exhorting them to incorporate all the recommendations of the select committee.
Replying Monday, Rahul thanked Hazare saying his letter gave him “encouragement” and stressing a commitment to providing the “strongest possible and competent Lokpal system”. “We respect your role in this and are very grateful for your support,” Rahul wrote.
Jaitley appeared to have played a key role in mollifying Hazare with frequent letters — one stated creation of a sarkari Lokpal could not be “your objective or ours”. What is also said to have contributed to Hazare’s change of heart was that his erstwhile follower Arvind Kejriwal had stolen his thunder on the anti-corruption plank with a startling debut in electoral politics.
Following the split in what was once Team Anna, some prominent faces of the movement such as Bedi chose to stay with Hazare and make a success of his movement by seeing the bill passed. Senior BJP leaders said they had nothing to do with the presence of Bedi and former Army chief V K Singh in Ralegaon Siddhi. “They are not associated with the BJP,” said a senior BJP leader.
The Congress’s role, said sources, was limited to engaging Hazare. Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan had sent a state cabinet minister to assure him of the Congress’s commitment to passing the bill. The party also sought to show an urgency by getting Rahul to bat for the bill.
“Hazare stands out as a reasonable, practical social activist who has successfully pressured the political system to pass the anti-corruption bill — unlike Arvind Kejriwal who seems to have reduced the debate to slogan-shouting,” said a lawmaker from the Rajya Sabha.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/making-peace-with-political-class-the-story-behind-the-consensus-over-lokpal-bill/1208955/

Saving archaeological heritage in Afghanistan -- Hans Curvers, ASOR blog

$
0
0

Saving Archaeological Heritage in Afghanistan

December 10, 2013 10:27 am 
ANET_DEC_Banner
By: Hans Curvers
Former coordinating archeologist at Mes Aynak 
Map showing location of Mes Aynak.
Map showing location of Mes Aynak.
During a crisis or conflict, interventions first focus on emergency relief. Once the ‘post-conflict stage’ is reached, the focus shifts to reconstruction. As soon as peace and stability are restored, the exit strategy starts. A straightforward linear process. Where does archaeology fit in?
In the Afghan reality, however, there is no such linear process. Afghanistan is neither a ‘post conflict’ nor a ‘conflict’ state: it is both at the same time. In a country where tribal and personal power structures prevail, efforts are impeded not only by lack of capacity, but also by corruption and an absence of political will. Archaeology is no exception.
Over the past thirty years, Afghanistan’s archeological heritage has been severely damaged and looted; over 2800 archaeological and historical sites need protection. The illegal trafficking of cultural artifacts also constitutes an ongoing problem. UNESCO’s and ICOM’s (International Council of Museums) efforts have focused on the protection of Afghan antiquities, but the Afghan government lacks sufficient capacity to guard sites and prevent treasures from being smuggled abroad.
Good Earth image of Mes Aynak showing location of remains.
Good Earth image of Mes Aynak showing location of remains.
The Russian invasion in 1979 resulted in an exodus of archeologists and curators of the National Archeological Institute (NAI). Between 1992 and 1994 more than 70% of the Kabul National Museum’s artifacts were looted. During the Taliban regime (1996-2001), pre-Islamic art was specifically targeted and destroyed. The most prominent example remains the destruction of the two giant Buddha statues in Bamiyan, which were blown up not only because they were pre-Islamic, but also to manifest the Taliban’s power over the Hazara Shia majority in Bamiyan. As such, the Taliban perceived and used culture as a weapon of war.
[Left] General view of hilltop excavations. [Center] Small tepe with building. [Right] Monastery façade showing looting holes. Photos courtesy Hans Curvers.
[Left] General view of hilltop excavations. [Center] Small tepe with building. [Right] Monastery façade showing looting holes. Photos courtesy Hans Curvers.
A new Antiquities Law (2004) aimed at reinstalling care and respect for Afghanistan’s Archeological Heritage, but its application and enforcement is a big challenge. Development and politics have replaced war as the immediate threats to Afghanistan’s heritage.
Buddish stupa.
Buddish stupa.
The situation at Mes Aynak (2009 to date) may serve as a good example of the present status of archaeological heritage in Afghanistan. A 30-year concession to start mining copper and other mineral resources threatens a unique complex of ancient mining facilities and Buddhist monasteries, presenting an apparent dilemma between development and conservation. The stakeholders in the project span the full range from the World Bank, responsible for the overall development program, to the local tribal chief tasked with solving day to day problems among the work force.
Mes Aynak is located 40 kilometers southeast of Kabul, and archaeological remains are spread out over at least six square kilometers. Discovered in 1963 by a French geologist, the site along the ancient Silk Route includes Buddhist monasteries and temples, forts, residential areas and mines, dating from at least the first century BC through the 10th century AD. Sites at Mes Aynak have revealed a unique assortment of metal, glass, and wooden objects, as well as painted murals and sculpture. Archaeological remains reveal the unique meeting of the Hellenistic, Persian, Central Asian, Tibetan, Indian and Chinese worlds, reflecting Afghanistan’s position at the center of ancient trade routes.
Temple under excavation.
Temple under excavation.
The presence of immense copper deposits drew people in antiquity, as well as Soviet geologists during the 1970s. Today it is estimated that at least 5.5 million metric tons of copper worth perhaps $100 billion or more could be mined from the valley. Al Qaeda had a base in a Soviet mining tunnel, and after American forces pushed out the Taliban, looters began exploiting the site. In 2007 the Metallurgical Corporation of China (MCC) paid $3 billion to lease the site for copper mining, which promises to provide hundreds of millions of dollars a year to the Afghan government in royalties: a clear challenge to use the resources wisely and create prosperity again.
The protection of cultural property and/or mitigation of the mining project’s impact at Mes Aynak is on the agenda of all stakeholders, at least nominally. Since 2010 the Délégation Archéologique Française en Afghanistan (DAFA) has partnered with the Ministry of Information and Culture, while World Bank funding allows the Program Management Units (implementation organizations that operate at the central, regional, and provincial levels) to engage teams of foreign archeologists to assist the national archeologists at Mes Aynak and develop plans for conservation. Approximately $10 million in project funding has been provided to date.
Mural being conserved. Photo courtesy Hans Curvers.
Mural being conserved. Photo courtesy Hans Curvers.
In 2010 DAFA provided an initial plan for excavation and conservation, so work could start. But the difficulties were many. To name just two basic examples, payment of worker salaries was haphazard and efficient security procedures for large numbers of workers entering the excavation were not in place; busses were checked over and over again due to a lack of coordination. Removal of land mines also continues in parts of the site.
We assume good intentions by all parties, but the reality is far removed from ‘best practices’. The World Bank sought assistance from UNESCO for DAFA to develop a comprehensive Archeological Management Plan (2013-2018), but UNESCO staff and consultants are generally unable to visit sites outside Kabul. DAFA’s financial means are insufficient and its presence on site is limited. Small matters, such as the lack of fuel for vehicles, consume much effort and can bring work to a halt.
Mural being conserved. Photo courtesy Hans Curvers.
Mural being conserved. Photo courtesy Hans Curvers.
And what to do with the wealth of excavated objects, for which no space is available in the Kabul Museum, even if fragile items could be safely transported there? The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) supervised the building of a large storage facility, for which they engaged a local contractor associated with the governor of Logar province: the same man who had allowed systematic plundering of the site before the mining concession. Storage of the objects on-site may ultimately serve him best.
The non-governmental organization Alliance for the Restoration of Cultural Heritage (ARCH) International, Inc., organized an expert meeting in June 2012 to address some of these concerns. Mining engineers and archeologists expressed fears about the application of such low standards. The concerns were then integrated into a Request for Inspection and submitted to the World Bank by Afghan citizens. But in the subsequent response the World Bank management pointed out that certain concerns are not its responsibility, since a commercial contract holds the government and the mining company accountable.
[Left] Checking workers as they enter the excavations. [Right] Demining at Mes Aynak. Photos courtesy Hans Curvers.
[Left] Checking workers as they enter the excavations. [Right] Demining at Mes Aynak. Photos courtesy Hans Curvers.
Ceramics collected, washed and abandoned. Photo courtesy Hans Curvers.
Ceramics collected, washed and abandoned. Photo courtesy Hans Curvers.
Agreements are not transparent, thus parties can get away blaming others. For example, the agreement between World Bank and government clearly states that Program Management Unit is ultimately responsible for monitoring the project. But the Program Management Unit saw its environmental consultant leave and also fired its coordinating archeologist. Both consultants complained about the lack of leverage with other stakeholders. It seems the Program Management Unit is the perfect construction for both the World Bank and Ministry of Mines to execute their plans while escaping responsibility.
The Metallurgical Corporation of China (MCC) is the operator of the mining project but has had no direct input into the archeological project. Monitoring progress at the site, they constantly pressed for faster completion. But at the same time, a recently provided MCC feasibility study reveals that mining work can only start in 2016 or later. Attempts to coordinate and conserve some of the sites are still on the agenda – in theory. In the meantime, poor security conditions have reduced the Chinese presence to a skeleton crew.
Chinese mining camp at Mes Aynak.
Chinese mining camp at Mes Aynak.
Afghanistan’s National Archeological Institute archeologists did not recognize the necessity for capacity building either by the experienced Afghan archeologists of the Academy of Sciences or by the international archeologists. Indeed they tended to perceive the latter as rivals, their presence as intrusive. To increase the number of local archeologists, freshly graduated students with no field experience were mobilized. While all these measures offered a temporary solution, they do not contribute to the development of necessary capacity.
Archeological heritage, and the threat to it, can only be understood in context. Politics and socio-economics should be included in order to attune proposals for assistance. The World Bank masterfully hides behind clauses and legal language, and Program Management Unit reports that archeological work is proceeding according to plan. In the meantime a long series of plans have been written and subsequently changed, but nobody knows which plan is being followed. Archaeologists and the Afghan Ministry of Information and Culture remain silent; the former because they fear expulsion from the project if they speak up, and the latter because it is much weaker than the Ministry of Mines or the local stakeholders.
Deputy Minster of Mines Nassir Durani visiting Mes Aynak. Photo courtesy Hans Curvers.
Deputy Minster of Mines Nassir Durani visiting Mes Aynak. Photo courtesy Hans Curvers.
A 2013 Program Management Unit report mentions the implementation of a program of documentation and archiving and refers to a conservation schedule. However, archeologists were given less than a month to wrap up their documentation. An archeological “report” controlled by administrators does not help to implement best practices at Mes Aynak. Today a core group of foreign archeologists monitors the progress on site, apparently without time pressure but still without a coherent plan.
Agreements can serve to define responsibilities but only if their implementation has realistic chances. Meanwhile, it is fruitless to speak of ‘lessons learned’ in a system where the principal function of reports is to cover up reality. Just mentioning achievements in statistics and not allowing for peer-review is a recipe for disaster. What remains is the hope that awareness of the prevailing low standards in Afghanistan may lead to insights and improvement, one day.
Hans H. Curvers was coordinating archeologist at Mes Aynak (August 2011 – February 2012) and participated in the ARCH expert meeting in Washington DC. For the work in Afghanistan he interrupted his position as archeological heritage advisor in the reconstruction of the Beirut City Center (Lebanon).

http://asorblog.org/?p=6298

SoniaG the spiteful. Rancour exposed - Statesman Edit

$
0
0
  • The Statesman
  • 17 Dec 2013
Rancour exposed

Declining  health  would  come  in  the  way  of  two  significant  developments  “registering”  with  the  former  firebrand  of  Indian  politics,  George  Fernandes.  Both,  however,  serve  to  confirm  the  viciousness  with  which  the  UPA  (read  Sonia  Gandhi?)  sought  to  nail  the  former  defence  minister  on  corruption  charges  ~  acts  of  sheer  vengeance   to  get  even  with  him  for  playing  a  leading  role in ensuring that a political price was extracted for kickbacks in the purchase of Bofors  howitzers.
On 11 December, a Delhi court discharged for want of evidence three Army officers who had been charge-sheeted by the CBI in what had been dubbed “coffingate”. A Special Judge ruled that there was no prima facie evidence to proceed against them. And just before that, the CBI formally closed its investigation into the acquisition of Barak ship-protecting missiles ~ in which Fernandes had been named ~ again for want of evidence.
 That the several spokespersons of the UPA have opted for silence on both issues sends out a loud signal ~ almost as loud as when Sonia Gandhi charged the admitted “family-baiter” of graft over the bodies of soldiers killed in Kargil. A sick fuss had been made over the purchase of reusable aluminium caskets in which the remains of the fallen soldiers were transferred to their home towns/villages for the Last Rites ~ a first-time gesture that was gratefully acknowledged by the grieving families.
Prior to that, bodies were generally cremated in the operational zone. To have claimed a scam in the purchase of the coffins betrayed a low mindset. The UPA also chose to ignore realities that Barak missiles were procured only after the DRDO conceded that its Trishul missile was a “dud”. In both affairs the Congress leadership went to town targeting Fernandes; now it looks the other way.
As despicable as the political revenge-seekers have been officials of the CBI: they have confirmed all suspicions of relishing being used as tools by the ruling entity. They kept the futile probes “alive” until no more political juice could be extracted from them ~ as they appear to be presently doing in at least two defence-related inquiries.
Officers as senior as a former Navy Chief and a Major-General had been projected as crooks by the CBI in the missiles andc offin deals, their reputations sullied. Surely such defamation and character assassination of high-ranking personnel cannot go unpunished, the CBI must be made to pay damages, though money is poor compensation. That alone might inject some “spine” into what the apex court recently slammed as a “caged parrot”. An inappropriate description, for it can “peck” hard, at the directions of its political masters.

Incredible Bengal
The  gambling,  betting  over  a  minor  daughter  and  her  forced  marriage  have  combined  to  brew  a  lethal  cocktail in Incredible  Bengal,  to  use  a  variant  of  the  tourism  ministry’s  glib  advertising  coinage.
Altogether a triple whammy of a crime that is almost as hideous as the fatwas of the khap panchayats of northern India. It might be tempting to draw parallels between the incident in Malda district and episodes of the Mahabharata and Thomas Hardy’s Mayor of Casterbridge. Overlooked in the process is the difference between fiction and fact.
Aside from literary allusions, it has been a collective disgrace for Bengal as 2014 is set to unfold. The incident would have been inconceivable in 19th century Bengal when superstition and ignorance were the two nooses hung around the neck of civilization. The clock has been turned back to the medieval era and almost unbelievably so. Pre-eminently, there was Rammohun Roy, Vidyasagar, Bentinck and Dalhousie then to steer the process of the Bengal Renaissance. Who is there now?
A gambler, who had lost all and everything, gave away his 13-year-old daughter in marriage; horror of horrors, the decision was reportedly firmed up in the presence of gram panchayat activists.
Clearly,   there   are   two   facets   to   the   crime   ~   gambling   per   se   and   the   marriage   of  the  minor  daughter  as  a  criminally  bizarre  escape  route.   And  if  indeed  the  panchayat  of  Habibpur  village  was  privy  to  the  unfolding  crime,  it  passes  understanding  how  the  district  police  administration  can  now  be  so impervious.
The least that the administration can attempt is to stop the wedding of a minor, which has been scheduled for 22 January, despite the fact that the families have gone through pre-marriage rituals. It would be an understatement to describe the circumstances as extraordinary.
In  the  larger  context,  it  devolves  on  the  State  to  crack  down  on  gambling  in  rural  Bengal,  that  can  drive  individuals  quicker  to  penury  than  to  a  fast  buck.   There  can  be  no  deeper  tragedy  than  to  bet  on  one’s  daughter.    Sad  to  reflect,  society  is  as  backward   and  inhumane  as  it  was  in  the  19th  century.  Malda records  an awesome chapter of social history, not another fiction. Bengal has exposed its underbelly.

Comment:
Vorpal 
Rancour exposed
Statesman's editorial reaction is a little late, because the judgments ("coffingate" and Barak missile) were delivered nearly a week ago. One should read this editorial along with the following news reports: http://articles.timesofindia.i... andhttp://zeenews.india.com/news/.... However, I appreciate this editorial, because it exposes the unmistakable "rancour" of the UPA govt and the so-called Gandhi-Nehru family.
One should perhaps add that the Trishul missile fiasco also exposes Dr Abdul Kalam, who has been given the hyped image of a super-scientist cum super-technologist. Trishul failure was Kalam failure. When Kalam was installed as President, many scientists and technologists perceived it as kicking him upstairs for saving the "Integrated Guided Missile Development Programme", IMDP.
DRDO as a whole also requires a thorough overhaul. One should start by shedding off the bio-medical research units, as some of its work borders on the ridiculous, a typical example being DRDO's claim that "Tulsi may act as shield against radiation". Aggressive promotion of such unsubstantiated, unverifiable and theoretically implausible claims, particularly for the use of our defence personnel, is extremely dangerous.

http://www.thestatesman.net/news/30111-edits.html
Viewing all 11039 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>