Itihāsa. Unhinging Śiva from the Indus Civilization -- Doris Srinivasan (1984)
Itihāsa. Aristotle on the Origin of the Jews in India -- Subhash Kak
Published 28th March 2017 |

This article is to try to make sense of a puzzling statement of Aristotle (384-322 BCE) that links Jews with India. This statement is recalled in a fragment by Aristotle’s pupil Clearchus who traveled widely and whose inscription on a tomb of a friend is preserved in the Afghan city of Ai-Khanoum.
The Jewish scholar Flavius Josephus (37 – 100 CE) quotes from Clearchus’s fragment in his Contra Apionem [Against Apion], which has Aristotle say: “Jews are derived from the Indian philosophers; they are named by the Indians Calami, and by the Syrians Judaei, and took their name from the country they inhabit, which is called Judea.” (Book I:22) [1]
I can think of two places that might have been the Calami of Aristotle. The first candidate is the famous port city of Kollam, in Kerala, which was well known to the Phoenicians and Romans, and the second is the ancient city of Kalyani or Kalyan, in Karnataka, which was to later become the capital of one branch of the Chalukya Empire. The second city, which has recently been renamed Basavakalyan, appears to be the older of the two.
The interaction between India and the West during the first millennium BCE is well known as in the mention in Old Testament of trade for ivory, apes and peacocks (1 Kings 10:22). There was thriving bilateral trade between India and Rome both through the overland caravan route and the southern sea route. By the time of Augustus 120 ships set sail every year from Myos Hormos to India. Pliny complains in Historia Naturae 12.41.84, “India, China and the Arabian Peninsula take one hundred million sesterces from our empire per annum at a conservative estimate: that is what our luxuries and women cost us.”
India and the West had rich interaction in the second millennium BCE also. This was the time of the Mitanni of Syria, who worshiped Vedic gods. The Mitanni ruled northern Mesopotamia (including Syria) for about 300 years, starting 1600 BCE, out of their capital of Vasukhani. In a treaty between the Hittites and the Mitanni, Indic deities Mitra, Varuṇa, Indra, and Nāsatya (Aśvins) are invoked. Their chief festival was the celebration of viṣuva (solstice) very much like in India. It is not only the kings who had Sanskrit names; a large number of other Sanskrit names have also been unearthed in the records from the area.
The list of the Sanskrit names used in Syria and elsewhere was published by P. E. Dumont of the Johns Hopkins University, in the Journal of American Oriental Society in 1947, and one may see a summary of that in my own book chapter on Akhenaten, Sūrya, and the Ṛgveda, which is available here. [2] The names of the main kings are (with the standard Sanskrit form or meaning inside brackets): The first Mitanni king was Sutarna I (good Sun). He was followed by Baratarna I (Paratarṇa, great Sun); Paraśukṣatra (ruler with axe); Saustatar (Saukṣatra, son of Sukṣatra, the good ruler); Paratarṇa II; Artadama (Ṛtadhāman, abiding in cosmic law); Sutarṇa II; Tushratta (Daśaratha or Tveṣaratha, having ten or fast chariots); and finally Matiwazza (Mativāja, whose wealth is thought), during whose lifetime the Mitanni state became a vassal to Assyria.
It is most interesting that the Mitannis were connected by marriage across several generations to the Egyptian 18th dynasty to which Pharaoh Akhenaten (ruled 1352-1336 BCE according to the mainstream view) belonged. Akhenaten’s second wife was Tadukhipa (“khipa” from the Sanskrit “kṣipā,” night) and she became famous as the queen Kiya (short for Khipa). His first wife was the beautiful Nefertiti, whose bust is available in a museum in Berlin.
Akhenaten (“glory of the Aten”) changed his name to honour Aten (“One god” represented as the solar disk) in his sixth year of rule. Many see Akhenaten as the originator of monotheism by his banishment of all deities except for his chosen one. He has been seen as a precursor to the Old Testament prophets, and thus to the Abrahamic religions. Some Biblical scholars see his Hymn to Aten as the original Psalm 104 of the Old Testament [3].

‘Amehotep IV’ (Akhenaten), found in N. de G. Davies, The Rock Tombs of El Amarna, part VI, ‘The Egypt Exploration Fund’ (London, 1908).
The other possibility is that Akhenaten’s worship of Aten is derived from the Vedic system through the three generations of queens in his family that were from the Mitanni. There are parallels between his hymn and the Sūrya hymns of the Ṛgveda. For example, in both the Sun has absolute power over the lives of animals and men and it provides natural bounties while also residing in the heart of the poet. Note also that Agni is praised as Yahvah in the Ṛgveda 21 times, and Yahweh is the name of the highest divinity in the Old Testament.
If the Vedic element was important, as is perhaps reflected in the mysticism of the Egyptian Book of the Dead, the cult of the dead and resurrection remained the most important element of the Egyptian religion. This cult continues to form the cornerstone of the three Abrahamic faiths.
The Vedic presence via the Mitanni in Egypt and the Near East occurs several centuries before the exodus of the Jews. This presence is sure to have left its mark in various customs, traditions, and beliefs. It may be that this encounter explains uncanny similarities in mythology and ritual, such as circumambulation around a rock, the use of a rosary of 108 beads, (or the idea of 33 gods in pre-Abrahamic traditions). These practices are easily understandable within the Vedic system, whereas they are remembered as commandments to be believed without understanding in the Western faiths. [4]
Sigmund Freud in his essay, Moses and Monotheism (1937) proposes that Moses was an Egyptian linked to the court of Akhenaten. In defence of this proposal he argued that the Hebrew word for “Lord,” “Adonai,” becomes “Aten” when the letters are written in Egyptian. [5]
The memory of India’s interaction with Egypt persisted within the Indo-Iranian world. The Iranian scholar Al-Biruni (973-1048), speaking of chariots of war in his book Tarikh Al-Hind, mentions the Greek claim that they were the first to use them and insists they are wrong because the chariots were already invented by Aphrodisios the Hindu, when he ruled over Egypt, about 900 years after the deluge. [6] This reference, which cannot be literally true because of the sheer distance between the two regions, is significant for it preserves the memory of a “Hindu” (Indic-inspired) king of Egypt prior to the Greek state. The reference to the chariots of war of this king (Akhenaten) seems to remember the foreigner warlords Hyksos (literally, ruler of the foreign countries) who ruled Egypt during the Second Intermediate Period just before the New Kingdom to which Akhenaten belonged.
It is not surprising then that the iconic Shiva-Shakti Yantra of the Indian spiritual tradition is identical to the Star of David of the Jews. A picture of the Star of David from the Leningrad Codex with a date of 1008 in its colophon is presented for comparison.
But how could the Indic element be so far from India, in Syria and Egypt? Scholars have suggested that after catastrophic earthquakes, or a long drought that dried up the Sarasvati River around 1900 BCE, there was the abandonment of Harappan cities and great migrations away in all directions [7]. Within India, we see the focus of the Sindhu-Sarasvati culture shift eastwards. To the west, we see the Kassites, a somewhat shadowy aristocracy with Indic names and worshiping Surya and the Maruts, in Western Iran about 1800 BCE. They captured power in Babylon in 1600 BCE, which they were to rule for over 500 years. And then, of course, we have the long line of the Sanskritic Mitanni aristocracy of Syria that we have already spoken about.
Megasthenes (350-290 BCE), the ambassador of Seleucus I to the court of Chandragupta Maurya in Pataliputra appears to have been aware of the connections between the Indians and the Jews. In the third book of Indica, as available to the Church Father Clement of Alexandria (200 CE), he writes: “All that has been said regarding nature by the ancients is asserted also by philosophers out of Greece, on the one part in India by the Brachmanes, and on the other in Syria by the people called the Jews.” [8]
A thousand years later, the memory of a special link between the Jews and India persisted. Al-Biruni mentions on page 206, vol. 1 of Alberuni’s India by Edward Sachau, that no foreigners excepting the Jews were permitted to enter Kashmir during the period it was under attack by Muslims.
India has its own Jewish communities that are found principally in South India; the oldest of these is that of the Cochin Jews. They believe they are the descendants of traders from Judea who arrived in 562 BCE, with others coming as exiles in 70 CE after the destruction of the Second Temple [9]. It appears that there was migration of communities in both directions.
Bibliography
- Flavius Josephus, Against Apion, Project Gutenberg: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2849
- Subhash Kak, ‘Akhenaten, Surya, and the Rgveda’, In G.C. Pande (ed.), A Golden Chain of Civilizations: Indic, Iranic, Semitic, and Hellenic up to C. 600 BCE, Munshiram Manoharlal, 2007. http://www.ece.lsu.edu/kak/akhena.pdf
- Dominic Montserrat, Akhenaten: History, Fantasy and Ancient Egypt, Routledge, 2002.
- Subhash Kak, The Wishing Tree, Aditya Prakashan, New Delhi, 2015.
- Sigmund Freud, Moses and Monotheism, The Hogarth Press, 1939.
- Al-Biruni, Tarikh Al-Hind, E.C. Sachau trans., Alberuni’s India, Kegan Paul, London, 1910.
- G. Feuerstein, S. Kak, and D. Frawley, In Search of the Cradle of Civilization, Quest Books, 2001.
- J.W. McCrindle, Ancient India As Described By Megasthenes And Arrian, Trübner & Co, London, 1877.
- Peter Schäfer, The History of the Jews in Antiquity, Routledge, 1995.
YouTube video on ai-Khanoum: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tka9TFyWIw
Subhash Kak is Regents Professor and a previous Head of the Computer Science Department at Oklahoma State University, who has made contributions to cryptography, artificial neural networks, and quantum information.
Kak is also notable for his Indological publications on the history of science, the philosophy of science, ancient astronomy, and the history of mathematics. Alan Sokal labeled Kak “one of the leading intellectual luminaries of the Hindu-nationalist diaspora”.
Itihāsa. The Buried Mysteries of Angkor Wat revealed by Lidar Survey
Huge Hidden Cities Found Near Angkor Wat Under the Forest - YouTube (2:01)
Laser technology reveals cities concealed under the earth which would have made up the world’s largest empire in 12th century. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/201... Credit: Dr Damian Evans/Journal of Archaeological Science
(225) The Buried Mysteries Of Angkor Wat | The City Of God Kings | Timeline - YouTube (49:33)
Lost Worlds investigates the very latest archaeological finds at three remote and hugely significant sites - Angkor Wat, Troy and Persepolis. Lost Worlds travels to each site and through high-end computer graphics, lavish re-enactment and the latest archaeological evidence brings them to stunning televisual life. From the 900-year-old remains of Angkor Wat in the Cambodian jungle the staggering City of the God Kings is recreated. From Project Troia, in North West Turkey, the location of the biggest archaeological expedition ever mounted the lost city is stunningly visualised and finally from Persepolis the city and the great Persian Empire are brought to life.
Revealed: Cambodia's vast medieval cities hidden beneath the jungle
Exclusive: Laser technology reveals cities concealed under the earth which would have made up the world’s largest empire in 12th century
Archaeologists in Cambodia have found multiple, previously undocumented medieval cities not far from the ancient temple city of Angkor Wat, the Guardian can reveal, in groundbreaking discoveries that promise to upend key assumptions about south-east Asia’s history.
The Australian archaeologist Dr Damian Evans, whose findings will be published in the Journal of Archaeological Science on Monday, will announce that cutting-edge airborne laser scanning technology has revealed multiple cities between 900 and 1,400 years old beneath the tropical forest floor, some of which rival the size of Cambodia’s capital, Phnom Penh.
Some experts believe that the recently analysed data – captured in 2015 during the most extensive airborne study ever undertaken by an archaeological project, covering 734 sq miles (1,901 sq km) – shows that the colossal, densely populated cities would have constituted the largest empire on earth at the time of its peak in the 12th century.
Evans said: “We have entire cities discovered beneath the forest that no one knew were there – at Preah Khan of Kompong Svay and, it turns out, we uncovered only a part of Mahendraparvata on Phnom Kulen [in the 2012 survey] … this time we got the whole deal and it’s big, the size of Phnom Penh big.”
A research fellow at Siem Reap’s École Française d’Extrême-Orient (EFEO) and the architect of the Cambodian Archaeological Lidar Initiative (Cali), Evans will speak at the Royal Geographic Society in London about the findings on Monday.
Evans obtained European Research Council (ERC) funding for the project, based on the success of his first lidar (light detection and ranging) survey in Cambodia in 2012. That uncovered a complex urban landscape connecting medieval temple-cities, such as Beng Mealea and Koh Ker, to Angkor, and confirmed what archaeologists had long suspected, that there was a city beneath Mount Kulen. It was not until the results of the significantly larger 2015 survey were analysed that the size of the city was apparent.
That survey uncovered an array of discoveries, including elaborate water systems that were built hundreds of years before historians believed the technology existed. The findings are expected to challenge theories on how the Khmer empire developed, dominated the region, and declined around the 15th century, and the role of climate change and water management in that process.
“Our coverage of the post-Angkorian capitals also provides some fascinating new insights on the ‘collapse’ of Angkor,” Evans said. “There’s an idea that somehow the Thais invaded and everyone fled down south – that didn’t happen, there are no cities [revealed by the aerial survey] that they fled to. It calls into question the whole notion of an Angkorian collapse.”
The Angkor temple ruins, which sprawl across the Unesco-protected Angkor archaeological park, are the country’s top tourist destination, with the main temple-city, Angkor Wat, appearing on the Cambodian national flag. Considered the most extensive urban settlement of pre-industrial times, and boasting a highly sophisticated water management system, Angkor’s supposed decline has long occupied archaeologists.
The new cities were found by firing lasers to the ground from a helicopter to produce extremely detailed imagery of the Earth’s surface. Evans said the airborne laser scanners had also identified large numbers of mysterious geometric patterns formed from earthen embankments, which could have been gardens.
Experts in the archaeological world agree these are the most significant archaeological discoveries in recent years.
Michael Coe, emeritus professor of anthropology at Yale University and one of the world’s pre-eminent archaeologists, specialises in Angkor and the Khmer civilisation.
“I think that these airborne laser discoveries mark the greatest advance in the past 50 or even 100 years of our knowledge of Angkorian civilisation,” he said from Long Island in the US.
There is an undiscovered city beneath Mount Kulen. Photograph: Terence Carter
“I saw Angkor for the first time in 1954, when I wondered at the magnificent temples, but there was nothing to tell us who had lived in the city, where they had lived, and how such an amazing culture was supported. To a visitor, Angkor was nothing but temples and rice paddies.”
Charles Higham, research professor at the University of Otago in Dunedin, New Zealand, and the leading archaeologist of mainland south-east Asia, said it was the most exciting paper he could recall reading
“I have been to all the sites described and at a stroke, they spring into life … it is as if a bright light has been switched on to illuminate the previous dark veil that covered these great sites,” Higham said. “Personally, it is wonderful to be alive as these new discoveries are being made. Emotionally, I am stunned. Intellectually, I am stimulated.”
David Chandler, emeritus professor at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, the foremost expert on Cambodian history and the author of several books and articles on the subject, said the work was thrilling and credited Evans and his colleagues with “rewriting history”.
Chandler said he believed it would open up a series of perspectives that would help people know more about Angkorian civilisation, and how it flourished and eventually collapsed.
“It will take time for their game-changing findings to drift into guide books, tour guides, and published histories,” Chandler said. “But their success at putting hundreds of nameless, ordinary, Khmer-speaking people back into Cambodia’s past is a giant step for anyone trying to deal with Cambodian history.”
David Kyle, an archaeologist and ecological anthropologist has conducted projects at Phnom Kulen, the location of the biggest findings, the massive city of Mahendraparvata, the size of Phnom Penh, beneath the forest floor.
He said the “survey results have revolutionised our understanding and approaches. It’s impossible not to be excited. It facilitates a paradigm shift in our comprehension of the complexity, size and the questions we can address.”
While the 2012 survey identified a sprawling, highly urbanised landscape at Greater Angkor, including rather “spectacularly” in the “downtown” area of the temple-city of Angkor Wat, the 2015 project has revealed a similar pattern of equally intense urbanism at remote archaeological ruins, including pre- and post-Angkorian sites.
Dr Peter Sharrock, who is on the south-east Asian board at London University’s School of Oriental and African Studies and has a decades-long connection to Cambodia, said the findings showed “clear data for the first time of dense populations settled in and around all ancient Khmer temples”.
“This urban and rural landscape, linked by road and canal networks, now seems to have constituted the largest empire on earth in the 12th century,” Sharrock said.
Evans, whose domain is an air-conditioned room full of computers at the French archaeological centre in Siem Reap, rather than dirt trenches at far-flung digs, is modest about his achievements and quick to credit his colleagues on the Cali project.
He said he believed the discoveries would completely upend many assumptions about the Khmer empire. He also hoped it would bring the study of people back into the picture.
Coe, who has been to many of the places covered by the survey and has seen the imagery, said that while the 2012 survey of Phnom Kulen demonstrated what the technology could do – “it could look through the dense jungle covering these hills and reveal an unexpected city which predated Angkor itself” – the 2015 survey took this into new dimensions.
This view was shared by Dr Mitch Hendrickson, the director of the industries of Angkor project and assistant professor in the department of anthropology at the University of Illinois. He said the initial survey had been “an incredible leap forward” in archaeologists’ ability to see everything for the first time and had been “a major game-changer” in understanding how the Angkorian Khmer people built, modified and lived in their cities. But he was “stunned” by the second survey.
“The results for Preah Khan of Kompong Svay are truly remarkable and are arguably the jewel in the crown of this mission. The lidar shows us that there was much, much more,” Hendrickson said, referencing a full-blown community layout that was previously unknown. “It’s both humbling and exciting. There are so many fantastic new discoveries.”
“We knew that Preah Khan of Kompong Svay was significant before the lidar – it’s the largest complex ever built during the Angkorian period at 22 sq km, it is connected to Angkor directly by a major road fitted with infrastructure, and likely played a role in facilitating iron supply to the capital.
“The new results suggest that it may have been more important than many temples built in Angkor and that it had a decent-sized population supporting it.”
Dr Martin Polkinghorne, a research fellow in the department of archaeology at Adelaide’s Flinders University who is conducting a joint research project on Longvek and Oudong, the post-Angkorian capitals, said his team would use the data during excavations scheduled until 2019 to understand the cities.
“The decline of Angkor is among the most significant events in the history of south-east Asia, but we do not have a precise date for the event,” Polkinghorne said. “By using lidar to guide excavations on the capitals of Cambodia that followed we can determine when the kings of Angkor moved south and clarify the end of Angkor.
“Cambodia after Angkor is customarily understood in terms of loss, retreat and absence; a dark age,” he said. “Yet, Cambodia was alive with activity after Angkor. South-east Asia was the hub of international trade between east and west. Using the lidar at Longvek and Oudong in combination with conventional archaeology we will reveal the dark age as equally rich, complex and diverse.”
What is a lidar survey?
An airborne laser scanner (ALS) is mounted to a helicopter skid pad. Flying with pre-determined guidelines, including altitude, flight path and airspeed, the ALS pulses the terrain with more than 16 laser beams per square metre during flights. The time the laser pulse takes to return to the sensor determines the elevation of each individual data point.
The data downloaded from the ALS is calibrated and creates a 3D model of the information captured during the flights. In order to negate tree foliage and manmade obstacles from the data, any sudden and radical changes in ground height are mapped out, with technicians who have models of the terrain fine-tuning the thresholds in processing these data points. Once completed, the final 3D model is handed over to the archaeologists for analysis, which can take months to process into maps.
Archaeologists have found a monumental structure buried under the sands of Petra, according to a new study that drew on satellite imagery to scan the ancient city.
Satellite surveys of the city revealed a massive platform, 184ft by 161ft, with an interior platform that was paved with flagstones, lined with columns on one side and with a gigantic staircase descending to the east. A smaller structure, 28ft by 28ft, topped the interior platform and opened to the staircase. Pottery found near the structure suggests the structure could be more than 2,150 years old.
“This monumental platform has no parallels at Petra or in its hinterlands at present,” the researchers wrote, noting that the structure, strangely, is near the city center but “hidden” and hard to reach.
“To my knowledge, we don’t have anything quite like this at Petra,” said Christopher Tuttle, an archaeologist who has worked at Petra for about 15 years and a co-author of the paper.

“I knew something was there and other archaeologists – who have worked in Petra for the last, God knows, 100 years at least – I know at least one other had noticed something there,” he said. But the structure’s sides resembled terrace walls common to the city, he noted: “I don’t think anybody paid much attention to them.”
Tuttle collaborated on the research with Sarah Parcak, a self-described “space archaeologist” from the University of Alabama at Birmingham, who used satellites to survey the site.
Parcak said that she begins surveys “quite skeptical” of what they might find – they are working on sites in northern Africa, North America, Europe and elsewhere – and that she was surprised to find the monument “turned out to be something significant”.
“Petra is a massive site, and we chose the name for our article [‘Hiding in plain sight’] precisely because, even though this is less than a kilometer south of the main city, previous surveys had missed it,” she said.
Tuttle and a team took subsequent trips to measure and examine the site from the ground. There they found scattered pottery, the oldest of which suggests the site could date back to the time of Petra’s founding. “We’re always very cautious on this,” Tuttle said, “but the oldest pottery can be dated back relatively securely to about 150BC.”
Petra was built by the Nabateans in what is now southern Jordan, while the civilization was amassing great wealth trading with its Greek and Persian contemporaries around 150BC. The city was eventually subsumed by the Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman empires, but its ruins remain famous for the work of its founders, who carved spectacular facades into cliffs and canyons. It was abandoned around the seventh century, and rediscovered by Swiss explorer Johann Burckhardt in 1812.
Along with the oldest Nabatean pottery, they found fragments that had been imported from the Hellenistic cultures who traded with Petra, as well as pottery of the eras when the Roman and the Byzantine empires took the city under their guard.

In the mountains, valleys and canyons surrounding Petra, Tuttle said, “there’s tons of small cultic shrines and platforms and these things, but nothing on this scale”. He said these sites, including a large, open plateau known as the Monastery and probably “used for various cultic displays or political activities”, are the closest parallel to the newly discovered edifice. “To be honest, we don’t know a whole lot about it.”
Those sites suggest that the structure was used for “some kind of massive display function”, he said. Unlike those other sites, however, the giant staircase does not face the city center of Petra, which Tuttle called a “fascinating” peculiarity.
“We don’t understand what the purpose [of visible shrines], because the Nabateans didn’t leave any written documents to tell us,” he said, adding: “But I find it interesting that such a monumental feature doesn’t have a visible relationship to the city.”
Nabatean shrines around Petra offer mixed clues about the ancient people’s practices. Like other Semitic cultures of the day, the Nabateans used an indirect, “aniconic” style to indirectly represent their divinities: carved blocks, stelae and niches. Sometimes there will be “an empty niche, just a carving in the wall, which the empty space itself can be representative or they would’ve had portable images”, Tuttle said.

But because they were in near constant trade with other cultures of the Mediterranean, the Nabateans also adopted figural representations. “Nabatean gods depicted as parallels to Zeus or Hermes or Aphrodite, and those kinds of things,” he said.
The researchers published their work in the Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. They said that while they have no plans at this time to excavate the site, they hope they will have the chance to work there in the future.
Parcak said that she expects “some pretty amazing discoveries over the next year” using satellites and sophisticated new techniques in south-east Asia “and other densely forested/rainforest areas”. A surveying technology called Lidar, for instance, has uncovered sites in remote forests in Central America.
“This technology is not about what you find – but how you can think about things like settlement scale and ancient human-environment interactions more broadly,” she added. “What happens when you can truly map the near-surface buried features for an entire site? I’m excited, but we need to think about the implications of having all this technology at our fingertips so we can use it responsibly.”
Archaeologists discover massive Petra monument that could be 2,150 years old
This article is more than 4 years oldBuried platform measuring 184ft by 161ft ‘has no parallels’ at the ancient city and was discovered using satellite imagery to scan the surrounding land
Alan Yuhas 9 June 2016
A facade at Petra, where a new monumental structure has been found at the city built by Nabateans more than 2,000 years ago. Photograph: Martin Keene/PAArchaeologists have found a monumental structure buried under the sands of Petra, according to a new study that drew on satellite imagery to scan the ancient city.
Satellite surveys of the city revealed a massive platform, 184ft by 161ft, with an interior platform that was paved with flagstones, lined with columns on one side and with a gigantic staircase descending to the east. A smaller structure, 28ft by 28ft, topped the interior platform and opened to the staircase. Pottery found near the structure suggests the structure could be more than 2,150 years old.
“This monumental platform has no parallels at Petra or in its hinterlands at present,” the researchers wrote, noting that the structure, strangely, is near the city center but “hidden” and hard to reach.
“To my knowledge, we don’t have anything quite like this at Petra,” said Christopher Tuttle, an archaeologist who has worked at Petra for about 15 years and a co-author of the paper.
“I knew something was there and other archaeologists – who have worked in Petra for the last, God knows, 100 years at least – I know at least one other had noticed something there,” he said. But the structure’s sides resembled terrace walls common to the city, he noted: “I don’t think anybody paid much attention to them.”
Tuttle collaborated on the research with Sarah Parcak, a self-described “space archaeologist” from the University of Alabama at Birmingham, who used satellites to survey the site.
Parcak said that she begins surveys “quite skeptical” of what they might find – they are working on sites in northern Africa, North America, Europe and elsewhere – and that she was surprised to find the monument “turned out to be something significant”.
“Petra is a massive site, and we chose the name for our article [‘Hiding in plain sight’] precisely because, even though this is less than a kilometer south of the main city, previous surveys had missed it,” she said.
Overview of the monumental platform, looking south-east. Jabal an-Nmayr is is indicated by the left-facing arrow, and the slope of ‘South Ridge’ with agricultural terracing by the down-facing arrow. Photograph: G al FaqeerIn the mountains, valleys and canyons surrounding Petra, Tuttle said, “there’s tons of small cultic shrines and platforms and these things, but nothing on this scale”. He said these sites, including a large, open plateau known as the Monastery and probably “used for various cultic displays or political activities”, are the closest parallel to the newly discovered edifice. “To be honest, we don’t know a whole lot about it.”
Those sites suggest that the structure was used for “some kind of massive display function”, he said. Unlike those other sites, however, the giant staircase does not face the city center of Petra, which Tuttle called a “fascinating” peculiarity.
“We don’t understand what the purpose [of visible shrines], because the Nabateans didn’t leave any written documents to tell us,” he said, adding: “But I find it interesting that such a monumental feature doesn’t have a visible relationship to the city.”
Nabatean shrines around Petra offer mixed clues about the ancient people’s practices. Like other Semitic cultures of the day, the Nabateans used an indirect, “aniconic” style to indirectly represent their divinities: carved blocks, stelae and niches. Sometimes there will be “an empty niche, just a carving in the wall, which the empty space itself can be representative or they would’ve had portable images”, Tuttle said.
But because they were in near constant trade with other cultures of the Mediterranean, the Nabateans also adopted figural representations. “Nabatean gods depicted as parallels to Zeus or Hermes or Aphrodite, and those kinds of things,” he said.
The researchers published their work in the Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. They said that while they have no plans at this time to excavate the site, they hope they will have the chance to work there in the future.
Parcak said that she expects “some pretty amazing discoveries over the next year” using satellites and sophisticated new techniques in south-east Asia “and other densely forested/rainforest areas”. A surveying technology called Lidar, for instance, has uncovered sites in remote forests in Central America.
“This technology is not about what you find – but how you can think about things like settlement scale and ancient human-environment interactions more broadly,” she added. “What happens when you can truly map the near-surface buried features for an entire site? I’m excited, but we need to think about the implications of having all this technology at our fingertips so we can use it responsibly.”
Petra was built by the Nabateans in what is now southern Jordan, while the civilization was amassing great wealth trading with its Greek and Persian contemporaries around 150BC. The city was eventually subsumed by the Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman empires, but its ruins remain famous for the work of its founders, who carved spectacular facades into cliffs and canyons. It was abandoned around the seventh century, and rediscovered by Swiss explorer Johann Burckhardt in 1812.Tuttle and a team took subsequent trips to measure and examine the site from the ground. There they found scattered pottery, the oldest of which suggests the site could date back to the time of Petra’s founding. “We’re always very cautious on this,” Tuttle said, “but the oldest pottery can be dated back relatively securely to about 150BC.”
Along with the oldest Nabatean pottery, they found fragments that had been imported from the Hellenistic cultures who traded with Petra, as well as pottery of the eras when the Roman and the Byzantine empires took the city under their guard.
Buried platform measuring 184ft by 161ft ‘has no parallels’ at the ancient city and was discovered using satellite imagery to scan the surrounding land
Alan Yuhas 9 June 2016
Archaeologists have found a monumental structure buried under the sands of Petra, according to a new study that drew on satellite imagery to scan the ancient city.
Satellite surveys of the city revealed a massive platform, 184ft by 161ft, with an interior platform that was paved with flagstones, lined with columns on one side and with a gigantic staircase descending to the east. A smaller structure, 28ft by 28ft, topped the interior platform and opened to the staircase. Pottery found near the structure suggests the structure could be more than 2,150 years old.
“This monumental platform has no parallels at Petra or in its hinterlands at present,” the researchers wrote, noting that the structure, strangely, is near the city center but “hidden” and hard to reach.
“To my knowledge, we don’t have anything quite like this at Petra,” said Christopher Tuttle, an archaeologist who has worked at Petra for about 15 years and a co-author of the paper.
“I knew something was there and other archaeologists – who have worked in Petra for the last, God knows, 100 years at least – I know at least one other had noticed something there,” he said. But the structure’s sides resembled terrace walls common to the city, he noted: “I don’t think anybody paid much attention to them.”
Tuttle collaborated on the research with Sarah Parcak, a self-described “space archaeologist” from the University of Alabama at Birmingham, who used satellites to survey the site.
Parcak said that she begins surveys “quite skeptical” of what they might find – they are working on sites in northern Africa, North America, Europe and elsewhere – and that she was surprised to find the monument “turned out to be something significant”.
“Petra is a massive site, and we chose the name for our article [‘Hiding in plain sight’] precisely because, even though this is less than a kilometer south of the main city, previous surveys had missed it,” she said.
In the mountains, valleys and canyons surrounding Petra, Tuttle said, “there’s tons of small cultic shrines and platforms and these things, but nothing on this scale”. He said these sites, including a large, open plateau known as the Monastery and probably “used for various cultic displays or political activities”, are the closest parallel to the newly discovered edifice. “To be honest, we don’t know a whole lot about it.”
Those sites suggest that the structure was used for “some kind of massive display function”, he said. Unlike those other sites, however, the giant staircase does not face the city center of Petra, which Tuttle called a “fascinating” peculiarity.
“We don’t understand what the purpose [of visible shrines], because the Nabateans didn’t leave any written documents to tell us,” he said, adding: “But I find it interesting that such a monumental feature doesn’t have a visible relationship to the city.”
Nabatean shrines around Petra offer mixed clues about the ancient people’s practices. Like other Semitic cultures of the day, the Nabateans used an indirect, “aniconic” style to indirectly represent their divinities: carved blocks, stelae and niches. Sometimes there will be “an empty niche, just a carving in the wall, which the empty space itself can be representative or they would’ve had portable images”, Tuttle said.
But because they were in near constant trade with other cultures of the Mediterranean, the Nabateans also adopted figural representations. “Nabatean gods depicted as parallels to Zeus or Hermes or Aphrodite, and those kinds of things,” he said.
The researchers published their work in the Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. They said that while they have no plans at this time to excavate the site, they hope they will have the chance to work there in the future.
Parcak said that she expects “some pretty amazing discoveries over the next year” using satellites and sophisticated new techniques in south-east Asia “and other densely forested/rainforest areas”. A surveying technology called Lidar, for instance, has uncovered sites in remote forests in Central America.
“This technology is not about what you find – but how you can think about things like settlement scale and ancient human-environment interactions more broadly,” she added. “What happens when you can truly map the near-surface buried features for an entire site? I’m excited, but we need to think about the implications of having all this technology at our fingertips so we can use it responsibly.”
Petra was built by the Nabateans in what is now southern Jordan, while the civilization was amassing great wealth trading with its Greek and Persian contemporaries around 150BC. The city was eventually subsumed by the Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman empires, but its ruins remain famous for the work of its founders, who carved spectacular facades into cliffs and canyons. It was abandoned around the seventh century, and rediscovered by Swiss explorer Johann Burckhardt in 1812.Tuttle and a team took subsequent trips to measure and examine the site from the ground. There they found scattered pottery, the oldest of which suggests the site could date back to the time of Petra’s founding. “We’re always very cautious on this,” Tuttle said, “but the oldest pottery can be dated back relatively securely to about 150BC.”
Along with the oldest Nabatean pottery, they found fragments that had been imported from the Hellenistic cultures who traded with Petra, as well as pottery of the eras when the Roman and the Byzantine empires took the city under their guard.
Laser technology reveals lost city around Angkor Wat

Airborne laser technology has uncovered a network of roads and canals, illustrating the remains of a bustling ancient city linking Cambodia's famed Angkor Wat temples complex.
The discovery was announced late on Monday in a peer-reviewed paper released early by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal. The laser scanning revealed a previously undocumented formal urban planned landscape integrating the 1,200-year-old temples.
The Angkor temple complex, Cambodia's top tourist destination and one of Asia's most famous landmarks, was constructed in the 12th century. Angkor Wat is a point of deep pride for Cambodians, appearing on the national flag, and was named a Unesco world heritage site.
"No one had ever mapped the city in any kind of detail before, and so it was a real revelation to see the city revealed in such clarity," University of Sydney archaeologist Damian Evans, the study's lead author, said by phone from Cambodia. "It's really remarkable to see these traces of human activity still inscribed into the forest floor many, many centuries after the city ceased to function and was overgrown."Archaeologists had long suspected that the city of Mahendraparvata lay hidden beneath a canopy of dense vegetation atop Phnom Kulen mountain in Siem Reap province. But the airborne lasers produced the first detailed map of a vast cityscape, including highways and previously undiscovered temples.
The technology, known as lidar, works by firing laser pulses from an aircraft to the ground and measuring the distance to create a detailed, three-dimensional map of the area. It is a useful tool for archaeologists because the lasers can penetrate dense vegetation and cover swaths of ground far faster than they could be analysed on foot. Lidar has been used to explore other archaeological sites, such as Stonehenge.
In April 2012, researchers loaded the equipment on to a helicopter, which spent days crisscrossing the dense forests from 800 metres above the ground. A team of Australian and French archaeologists then confirmed the findings with an expedition on foot through the jungle.
Archaeologists had already spent years doing ground research to map a 3.5 sq mile section of the city's downtown area. But the lidar revealed the section was much bigger – at least 14 sq miles – and more heavily populated than once believed.
"The real revelation is to find that the downtown area is densely inhabited, formally-planned and bigger than previously thought," Evans said. "To see the extent of things we missed before has completely changed our understanding of how these cities were structured."
Researchers do not yet know why the civilisation at Mahendraparvata collapsed. But Evans said one current theory is that possible problems with the city's water management system may have driven people out.
The next step for researchers involves excavating the site, which Evans hopes will reveal clues about how many people once lived in the city.
Angkor, Cambodia, 2015
January/February 2021

Thiruvathirai: The Dance Of Shiva At Every Level byAravindan Neelakandan
Ancient tradition distinguishes between jyautiṣiká 'astrologer' (Pāṇini); निमित्तज्ञः 'knower of omens'; this clue resolves absurd dates posited by astronomers
-- Resolving the absurdity of three dates for Mahabharata war derived by astronomy buffs: 1478 BCE, 3067 BCE, 5376 BCE
A jyautiṣiká जौतिषिक is an astronomer who documents celestial events.
A निमित्तज्ञः nimittajna is an interpreter of omens.
I submit that MBh references related to celestial events should be clearly distinguished between the observations of a jyautiṣiká and of a निमित्तज्ञः । Thus, the insights of a निमित्तज्ञः related to Arundhati (a binary star with Vasiṣṭa) should be distinguished from the observation of a jyautiṣiká who observes and records a celestial event.
Similarly, the meaning of the word 'graha' should be interpreted context. Graha is a word which means both 'planet' and 'comet'. Text of MBh should be carefully interpreted to determine the intended planetary or comet motion on the celestial sky.
I have appended a detailed explanatory note of Dr. Jayasree Saranathan which should help the astronomy-club buffs to distinguish betwen the observations of a jyautiṣiká and of a निमित्तज्ञः । while determining the dates of contemporary events recorded in the text of MBh.
Mbh 6-108-3 sacred-texts.com/hin/mbs/mbs061
3 निमित्तानि निमित्तज्ञः सर्वतॊ वीक्ष्य वीर्यवान
परतपन्तम अनीकानि दरॊणः पुत्रम अभाषत
Drona is called निमित्तज्ञः 'astrologer, who knows the meaning of omens'.
Only one of these dates can be right.
One thing is clear. Mahabharata is the most accurately dated Itihasa in the history of human civilization. With over 200 celestial observations discussed and recorded in the Great Epic, the challenge is to make a clear distinction between 'astrological omens' and contemporary 'astronomical observations'. The tradition is succinctly recorded by Aryabhata:
Āryabhaṭīya emphatically records the beginning of Kaliyuga at 3102 BCE in his Āryabhaṭīya in an autobiographical context, citing his age:
10. When three yugapādas and sixty times sixty years had elapsed (from the beginning of the yuga) then twenty-three years of my life had passed.
“If Āryabhaṭa began the Kaliyuga at 3102 BCE as later astronomers did, and if his fourth yugapāda began with the beginning of the Kaliyuga, we arrive at the date 499 CE. It is natural to take this as the date of composition of the treatise. “ (The Āryabhaṭīya of Āryabhaṭa—an Ancient Indian work on Mathematics and Astronomy, tr. By Walter Eugene Clark, Univ. of Chicago Press, Illinois, 1930 (pp.54-55)
Source: https://archive.org/stream/The_Aryabhatiya_of_Aryabhata_Clark_1930#page/n3/mode/2up
Kannada and Oriya lexicons provide a distinction between nimitta and upādāna, 'instrumental cause' and 'material cause':
I submit that the observation of Āryabhaṭa should be the fulcrum around which the differing interpretations of astronomy-buffs should be resolved. The astronomy-buffs should agree upon the categorisation of textual references as either nimittamātram or based on ज्योतिषं or observations on contemporary celestial events.
ज्योतिषं, क्ली, (ज्योतिः सूर्य्यादीनां ग्रहाणां गत्या-दिकं प्रतिपाद्यतया अस्त्यस्येति अच् ।) वेदाङ्ग-शास्त्रविशेषः । तत् ग्रहणादिगणनशास्त्रम् ।इत्यमरटीकायां भरतः ॥“पञ्चम्कन्धमिदं शास्त्रं होरागणितसंहिता ।केरलिः शकुनञ्चैव -- ॥”इति प्रश्नरत्नटीका ॥ * ॥अस्य सम्बन्धादि यथा, --“अस्य शास्त्रस्य सम्बन्धो वेदाङ्गमिति चोदितः ।अभिधेयञ्च जगतां शुभाशुभनिरूपणम् ॥इज्याध्ययनसंक्रान्तिग्रहषोडशकर्म्मणाम् ।प्रयोजनञ्च विज्ञेयं तत्तत्कालविनिर्णयः ॥”इति नारदीयम् ॥ * ॥अस्याध्ययनं द्बिजैः कर्त्तव्यम् । यथा, --“सिद्धान्तसंहिताहोरारूपस्कन्धत्रयात्मकम् ।वेदस्य निर्म्मलं चक्षुर्ज्योतिःशास्त्रमकल्मषम् ॥विनैतदखिलं श्रौतं स्मार्त्तं कर्म्म न सिध्यति ।तस्माज्जगद्धितायेदं ब्रह्मणा निर्म्मितं पुरा ॥अतएव द्विजैरेतदध्येतव्यं प्रयत्नतः ॥”इति नारदः ॥ * ॥शूद्रस्य पाठनिषेधो यथा, --“स्नेहाल्लोभाच्च मोहाच्च यो विप्रोऽज्ञानतो-ऽपि वा ।शूद्राणामुपदेशन्तु दद्यात् स नरकं व्रजेत् ॥”इति गर्गः ॥ * ॥अस्य ज्ञानमावश्यकं यथा, --“वेदा हि यज्ञार्थमभिप्रवृत्ताःकालानुपूर्ब्ब्या विहिताश्च यज्ञाः ।तस्मादिदं कालविधानशास्त्रंयो ज्योतिषं वेद स वेद यज्ञान् ॥यथा शिखा मयूराणां नागानां मणयो यथा ।तद्बद्वेदाङ्गशास्त्राणां गणितं मूर्द्ध्नि संस्थितम् ॥”इति वेदाङ्गज्योतिषम् ॥ * ॥अस्याध्ययनफलं यथा, --“एवंविधस्य श्रुतिनेत्रशास्त्र-स्वरूपभर्त्तुः खलु दर्शनं वै ।निहन्त्यशेषं कलुषं जनानांषडब्दजं धर्म्मसुखास्पदं स्यात् ॥”इति माण्डव्यः ॥ * ॥अस्य ज्ञाने फलं यथा, --“ज्योतिश्चक्रे तु लोकस्य सर्व्वस्योक्तं शुभाशुभम् ।ज्योतिर्ज्ञानन्तु यो वेद स याति परमां गतिम् ॥”इति गर्गः ॥--शब्दकल्पद्रुमः
ज्योतिर्विद् पु० ज्योतिषां सूर्य्यादीनां गत्यादिकं वेत्ति विद्-किप् । ज्योतिःशास्त्राभिज्ञे । “दृष्ट्वा ज्योतिर्विदोवैद्यान् दद्याद्गां काञ्चनं महीम्” याज्ञ० । ज्योति-र्विदाभरणम् ।
ज्योतिर्विद्या स्त्री ज्योतिषां सूर्य्यादीनां गत्थादिज्ञानसा-धनं विद्या । ज्योतिःशास्त्रे ।--वाचस्पत्यम्
jyautiṣiká m. ʻ astrologer ʼ Pāṇ., jyōtiṣika -- m. VarBr̥S. [A. zuhāl ʻ fireplace ʼ.(CDIAL 5297)
Mahabharata: 4-42-22
adeśikā mahāraṇye grīṣme śatruvaśaṃ gatā
yathā na vibhramet senā tathā nītir vidhīyatām
Karna observed their troops had come to an unknown place possessed by enemies and in the mighty forest in the hot grīṣma season
Note:
Mahabharata: 2-72 21
divolkāś cāpatan ghorā rāhuś cārkam upāgrasat
aparvaṇi mahāghoraṃ prajānāṃ janayan bhayam
Translation by Ganguli: “Meteors fell from the sky, and Rahu by swallowing the Sun unseasonably alarmed the people terribly”
Mahabharata: 5-183 -22 “arkaṃ ca sahasā dīptaṃ svarbhānur abhisaṃvṛṇot”
When Parasurama fell down on the earth afflicted by the shaft of Bhishma, it is said that Rahu forcibly attained the blazing sun
Mahabharata: 14-76-15 “rāhur agrasad ādityaṃ yugapat somam eva ca”
when Arjuna was badly wounded by the Saindhavas during his military campaign for the Aswamedha yajna, it is said that Rahu swallowed both the sun and the moon at the same time
Mahabharata: 5-81- v.6,7
6 [व] ततॊ वयपेते तमसि सूर्ये विमल उद्गते
मैत्रे मुहूर्ते संप्राप्ते मृद्व अर्चिषि दिवाकरे
7 कौमुदे मासि रेवत्यां शरद अन्ते हिमागमे
सफीतसस्यमुखे काले कल्यः सत्त्ववतां वरः
kaumude māsi revatyāṃ śarad ante himāgame
sphītasasyamukhe kāle kalyaḥ sattvavatāṃ varaḥ
Translation by Ganguli: “The night having passed away, a bright sun arose in the east. The hour called Maitra set in, and the rays of the sun were still mild. The month was (Kaumuda Kartika) under the constellation Revati. It was the season of dew, Autumn having departed. The earth was covered with abundant crops all around.”
Note: Kartika was also known as Kaumuda.
Source: DDSA: The practical Sanskrit-English dictionary
Kaumudī (कौमुदी).—[kumudasyeyaṃ prakāśakatvāt aṇ ṅīṣ Tv.]
1) Moonlight; शशिना सह याति कौमुदी (śaśinā saha yāti kaumudī) Ku.4.33; शशिनमुपगतेयं कौमुदी मेघमुक्तम् (śaśinamupagateyaṃ kaumudī meghamuktam) R.6.85; (the word is thus popularly derived :-kau modante janā yasyāṃ tenāsau kaumudī matā).
2) Anything serving as moonlight, i. e. causing delight and balmy coolness; त्वं कौमुदी नयनयोरमृतं त्वमङ्गे (tvaṃ kaumudī nayanayoramṛtaṃ tvamaṅge) U.2; त्वमस्य लोकस्य च नेत्रकौमुदी (tvamasya lokasya ca netrakaumudī) Ku.5.71; या कौमुदी नयनयो- र्भवतः सुजन्मा (yā kaumudī nayanayo- rbhavataḥ sujanmā) Māl.1.34; cf. चन्द्रिका (candrikā).
3) The full moon day in Kārtika; तस्मात्तु कपिला देया कौमुद्यां ज्येष्ठपुष्करे (tasmāttu kapilā deyā kaumudyāṃ jyeṣṭhapuṣkare) Mb.13.13.32.
4) The full moon day in Āśvina.
5) Festivity (in general).
6) Particularly, a festive day on which temples, houses &c. are illuminated.
7) (At the end of titles of works &c.) Elucidation, throwing light on the subject treated; e. g. तर्ककौमुदी, साख्यतत्त्वकौमुदी, सिद्धान्तकौमुदी (tarkakaumudī, sākhyatattvakaumudī, siddhāntakaumudī) &c.
कौमुदी, स्त्री, (कुमुदस्य इयं प्रकाशकत्वात् “तस्येदं” ।४ । ३ । १२० । इत्यण् ततो ङीप् ।) ज्योत्स्ना ।इत्यमरः । १ । ३ । १६ । (यथा, कुमारे । ४ ३३ ।“शशिना सह याति कौमुदी ॥सह मेघेन तडित्प्रलीयते ।प्रमदाः पतिवर्त्मगा इतिप्रतिपन्नं हि विचेतनैरपि” ॥)उत्सवः । इति धरणी । (यथा, महाभारते १३पर्व्वणि ।“अकालकौमुदीञ्चैव चक्रतुः सार्व्वकालिकीम्” ॥कौमुदस्य कार्त्तिकमासस्य इयं “तस्येदम्” । ४ ।३ । १२० । इति अण् । ततो ङीप् । यदुक्तम् ।“कुशब्देन मही ज्ञेया मुद हर्षे ततो द्वयम् ।धातुज्ञैर्नियमैश्चैव तेन सा कौमुदी स्मृता” ॥)कार्त्तिकोत्सवः । स तु कार्त्तिकीपूर्णिमायां कर्त्तव्यः ।इति त्रिकाण्डशेषः । कार्त्तिकीपूर्णिमा ॥आश्विनीपूर्णिमा । इति शब्दरत्नावली । (यथा, --“आश्विने पौर्णमास्यान्तु चरेज्जागरणं निशि ।कौमुदी सा समाख्याता कार्य्या लोकविभूतये” ॥दीपोत्सवतिथिः । यथा, रघुप्रभृतिटीकाकृ-न्मल्लिनाथधृतभविष्योत्तरवचनम् ।“कौ मोदन्ते जना यस्यां तेनासौ कौमुदी स्मृता” ॥कुमुदान्येव कौमुदी । सुदी वा सालुक इति भाषा ॥)
--शब्दकल्पद्रुमः
कौमुद पु० “कौ मोदन्ते जनायस्मिन् कौमुदस्तेन कीर्त्तितः”इक्तुक्तलक्षणे १ कार्त्तिकमासे । “एतैरन्यैश्च राजेन्द्रैःपुरा मांसं न भक्षितम् । शारदं कौमुदं मासं ततस्तेस्वर्गमाप्लुयुः । कौमुदं तु विशेषेण शुक्लपक्षं नराधिप! ।वर्ज्जयेत् सर्वमांसानि धर्म्मोह्यत्र विधीयते” म० त० भार०
कौमुदी स्त्री कुमदस्येयं प्रकाशकत्वात् प्रिया अण् ङीप् ।१ न्योत्लायाम् अमरः । “शशिना सह याति कौमुदी”कुमा० १ तद्वत्प्रकाशिकायाम् “त्वमस्य लोकस्य च नेत्रकौ-दी” कुमा० कौमुदस्येवम् अण् ङीप् । “कुशब्देन महीज्ञेया मुद हर्षे० ततोद्वयम् । धातुज्ञैर्नियमैश्चैव तेन सांकौमुदी स्मृता” इत्युक्तायां २ कार्त्तिकपौर्ण्णमास्यां “कौमोदन्ते जनायस्यान्नानाभावैः परस्परम् । हृष्टास्तुष्टाःसुखापन्नास्तेन सा कौमुदी मता” इत्युक्तायाम् ३ आश्विनषौर्ण्णमास्याम् “आश्विने षौर्ण्णगास्यान्तु चरेज्जागरणं निशिकौमुदी सा समाख्याता कार्य्या लोकविभूतये” ति० त०लौङ्गोक्तेः । ४ दीपोत्मवतिथौ दीपोत्वतिथिं प्रकृत्यभविष्योत्तरे “कौमोदन्ते जनायस्यां तेन सा कौमुदी मता”“सखीजनोद्वीक्षणकौमुदीमुखम्” रघुः कौमुदी दीपोत्वातिथिः” इति मल्लि०” ५ उत्सवे धरणिः” ६ कार्त्तिकोत्सवेत्रिका० । स्वार्थे क । ह्रस्वे कौमुदिका ज्योत्स्नायाम् ।संज्ञायां कन् । उमासखीभेदे शब्दरत्ना० कुमुद + चतुरर्थ्यांकुमुदा० ठक् । कौमुदिक कुमुदसन्निकृष्टदेशादौ त्रि०
--वाचस्पत्यम्
A reference is made in MBh. to the thirty-sixth year from the date of the war in the text. In thirty-sixth year occurs the death of Krishna consistent with Gandhari’s curse.
Hindu tradition has recognized this thirty-sixth year as the start of Kali Yuga, calendrical reckoning.
The Bhagavata Purana (1.18.6), Vishnu Purana (5.38.8), and Brahma Purana (2.103.8) state that the day Krishna left the earth was the day that the Dvapara Yuga ended and the Kali Yuga began:
— Bhagavata Purana Part I. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited. 1950. p. 137. (1.18.6) On the very day, and at the very moment the Lord [Krishna] left the earth, on that very day this Kali, the source of irreligiousness, (in this world), entered here.
— Wilson, H. H. (1895). The Vishnu Purana. S.P.C.K. Press. p. 61. (5.38.8) The Parijata tree proceeded to heaven, and on the same day that Hari [Krishna] departed from the earth the dark-bodied Kali age descended.
— Brahma Purana Part 2. Motilal Banarsidass. 1955. p. 515. (2.103.8) It was on the day on which Krishna left the Earth and went to heaven that the Kali age, with time for its body set in.
Gandhari’s curse states in Stri-vilapa parva: “In the thirty-sixth year from this, O slayer of Madhu, thou shalt, after causing the slaughter of thy kinsmen and friends and sons, perish by disgusting means in the wilderness.”
Mausala Parva confirms this: (After the death of Balarama), Keshava (Krishna)… also recollected the words that Durvasas had spoken at the time his body was smeared by that Rishi with the remnant of the Payasa he had eaten (while a guest at Krishna’s house). The high-souled one, thinking of the destruction of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas, as also of the previous slaughter of the Kurus, concluded that the hour (for his own departure from the world) had come.
Book 16: Mausala Parva
Kisari Mohan Ganguli, tr.
[1883-1896]
Death of Krishna
Section 4
…
"Proceeding then to the forest, Keshava beheld Rama sitting in a solitary spot thereof. He also saw that Rama had set himself to Yoga and that from out his mouth was issuing a mighty snake. The colour of that snake was white. Leaving the human body (in which he had dwelt so long), that high-souled naga of a 1,000 heads and having a form as large as that of a mountain, endued besides with red eyes, proceeded along that way which led to the ocean. Ocean himself, and many celestial snakes, and many sacred Rivers were there, for receiving him with honour. There were Karkotaka and Vasuki and Takshaka and Prithusravas and Varuna and Kunjara, and Misri and Sankha and Kumuda and Pundarika, and the high-souled Dhritarashtra, and Hrada and Kratha and Sitikantha of fierce energy, and Chakramanda and Atishanda, and that foremost of Nagas called Durmukha, and Amvarisha, and king Varuna himself, O monarch. Advancing forward and offering him the Arghya and water to wash his feet, and with diverse other rites, they all worshipped the mighty Naga and saluted him by making the usual enquiries.
"After his brother had thus departed from the (human) world, Vasudeva of celestial vision, who was fully acquainted with the end of all things, wandered for some time in that lonely forest thoughtfully. Endued with great energy he then sat down on the bare earth. He had thought before this of everything that had been fore-shadowed by the words uttered by Gandhari in former days. He also recollected the words that Durvasas had spoken at the time his body was smeared by that Rishi with the remnant of the Payasa he had eaten (while a guest at Krishna’s house). The high-souled one, thinking of the destruction of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas, as also of the previous slaughter of the Kurus, concluded that the hour (for his own departure from the world) had come. He then restrained his senses (in Yoga). Conversant with the truth of every topic, Vasudeva, though he was the Supreme Deity, wished to die, for dispelling all doubts and establishing a certainty of results (in the matter of human existence), simply for upholding the three worlds and for making the words of Atri’s son true. Having restrained all his senses, speech, and mind, Krishna laid himself down in high Yoga.
"A fierce hunter of the name of Jara then came there, desirous of deer. The hunter, mistaking Keshava, who was stretched on the earth in high Yoga, for a deer, pierced him at the heel with a shaft and quickly came to that spot for capturing his prey. Coming up, Jara beheld a man dressed in yellow robes, rapt in Yoga and endued with many arms. Regarding himself an offender, and filled with fear, he touched the feet of Keshava. The high-souled one comforted him and then ascended upwards, filling the entire welkin with splendour. When he reached Heaven, Vasava and the twin Ashvinis and Rudra and the Adityas and the Vasus and the Viswedevas, and Munis and Siddhas and many foremost ones among the Gandharvas, with the Apsaras, advanced to receive him. Then, O king, the illustrious Narayana of fierce energy, the Creator and Destroyer of all, that preceptor of Yoga, filling Heaven with his splendour, reached his own inconceivable region. Krishna then met the deities and (celestial) Rishis and Charanas, O king, and the foremost ones among the Gandharvas and many beautiful Apsaras and Siddhas and Saddhyas. All of them, bending in humility, worshipped him. The deities all saluted him, O monarch, and many foremost of Munis and Rishis worshipped him who was the Lord of all. The Gandharvas waited on him, hymning his praises, and Indra also joyfully praised him."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m16/m16004.htm
Section 5
Vaishampayana said: "Meanwhile Daruka, going to the Kurus and seeing those mighty car-warriors, the son of Pritha, informed them of how the Vrishnis had slain one another with iron bolts. Hearing that the Vrishnis along with the Bhojas and Andhakas and Kukuras had all been slain, the Pandavas, burning with grief, became highly agitated. Then Arjuna, the dear friend of Keshava, bidding them farewell, set out for seeing his maternal uncle. He said that destruction would soon overtake everything. Proceeding to the city of the Vrishnis with Daruka in his company, O puissant king, that hero beheld that the city of Dwaraka looked like a woman bereft of her husband. Those ladies who had, before this, the very Lord of the universe for their protector, were now lordless. Seeing that Partha had come for protecting them, they all set up a loud wail. 16,000 ladies had been wedded to Vasudeva. Indeed, as soon as they saw Arjuna arrive, they uttered a loud cry of sorrow. As soon as the Kuru prince met those beauteous ones deprived of the protection of Krishna and of their sons as well, he was unable to look at them, his vision being obstructed by tears. The Dwaraka river had the Vrishnis and the Andhakas for its water, steeds for its fishes, cars for its rafts, the sound of musical instruments and the rattle of cars for its waves, houses and mansions and public squares for its lakes. Gems and precious stones were its abundant moss. The walls of adamant were the garlands of flowers that floated on it. The streets and roads were the strong currents running in eddies along its surface. The great open squares were the still large lakes in its course. Rama and Krishna were its two mighty alligators. That agreeable river now seemed to Arjuna to be the fierce Vaitarani bound up with Time’s net. Indeed, the son of Vasava, endued with great intelligence, beheld the city to look even thus, reft as it was of the Vrishni heroes. Shorn of beauty, and perfectly cheerless, it presented the aspect of a lotus flower in the season of winter. Beholding the sight that Dwaraka presented, and seeing the numerous wives of Krishna, Arjuna wailed aloud with eyes bathed in tears and fell down on the earth. Then Satya, the daughter of Satrajit, and Rukmini too, O king, fell down beside Dhananjaya and uttered loud wails of grief. Raising him then they caused him to be seated on a golden seat. The ladies sat around that high-souled one, giving expression to their feelings. Praising Govinda and talking with the ladies, the son of Pandu comforted them and then proceeded to see his maternal uncle."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m16/m16005.htm
Gandhari’s curse
Book 11: Stri Parva
Stri-vilapa-parva
Section 25
Vaishampayana continued, "Having said these words, Gandhari, deprived of her senses by grief, fell down on the earth! Casting off her fortitude, she suffered her senses to be stupefied by grief. Filled with wrath and with sorrow at the death of her sons, Gandhari, with agitated heart, ascribed every fault to Keshava.
"Gandhari said, ‘The Pandavas and the Dhartarashtras, O Krishna, have both been burnt. Whilst they were thus being exterminated, O Janardana, why wert thou indifferent to them? Thou wert competent to prevent the slaughter, for thou hast a large number of followers and a vast force. Thou hadst eloquence, and thou hadst the power (for bringing about peace). Since deliberately, O slayer of Madhu, thou wert indifferent to this universal carnage, therefore, O mighty-armed one, thou shouldst reap the fruit of this act. By the little merit I have acquired through waiting dutifully on my husband, by that merit so difficult to attain, I shall curse thee, O wielder of the discus and the mace! Since thou wert indifferent to the Kurus and the Pandavas whilst they slew each other, therefore, O Govinda, thou shalt be the slayer of thy own kinsmen! In the thirty-sixth year from this, O slayer of Madhu, thou shalt, after causing the slaughter of thy kinsmen and friends and sons, perish by disgusting means in the wilderness. The ladies of thy race, deprived of sons, kinsmen, and friends, shall weep and cry even as these ladies of the Bharata race!’"
Vaishampayana continued, "Hearing these words, the high-souled Vasudeva, addressing the venerable Gandhari, said unto her these words, with a faint smile, ‘There is none in the world, save myself, that is capable of exterminating the Vrishnis. I know this well. I am endeavouring to bring it about. In uttering this curse, O thou of excellent vows, thou hast aided me in the accomplishment of that task. The Vrishnis are incapable of being slain by others, be they human beings or gods or Danavas. The Yadavas, therefore shall fall by one another’s hand.’ After he of Dasharha’s race had said these words, the Pandavas became stupefied. Filled with anxiety all of them became hopeless of life!’"
Section 26
"The holy one said, ‘Arise, arise, O Gandhari, do not set thy heart on grief! Through thy fault, this vast carnage has taken place! Thy son Duryodhana was wicked-souled, envious, and exceedingly arrogant. Applauding his wicked acts, thou regardest them to be good. Exceedingly cruel, he was the embodiment of hostilities, and disobedient to the injunctions of the old. Why dost thou wish to ascribe thy own faults to me? Dead or lost, the person that grieves for what has already occurred, obtaineth more grief. By indulging in grief, one increases it two-fold. A woman of the regenerate class bears children for the practice of austerities; the cow brings forth offspring for bearing burdens; the mare brings forth her young for acquiring speed of motion; the Shudra woman bears a child for adding to the number of servitors; the Vaishya woman for adding to the number of keepers of cattle. A princess, however, like thee, brings forth sons for being slaughtered!’"
Vaishampayana said, "Hearing these words of Vasudeva that were disagreeable to her, Gandhari, with heart exceedingly agitated by grief, remained silent. The royal sage Dhritarashtra, however, restraining the grief that arises from folly, enquired of Yudhishthira the just, saying, ‘If, O son of Pandu, thou knowest it, tell me the number of those that have fallen in this battle, as also of those that have escaped with life!’
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m11/m11025.htm
ni-√mā Ā. -mimīte (pf. -mamire, RV. iii, 38, 7 ), to measure, adjust, RV. ; &c. (cf. nime).;nimitta n. (possibly connected with ni-√mā above) a butt, mark, target, MBh. sign, omen, Mn. ; Yājñ. ; MBh. &c. (cf. dur-n°) (Monier-Williams)
निमित nimita 1 See निर्मित; caused; शापोमयैवनिमितस्तदवैतविप्राः Bhāg.3.16.26. -2 Measured.
निमित्तम् nimittam [नि-मिद्-क्त Tv.] 1 A cause, motive, ground reason; निमित्तनैमित्तिकयोरयंक्रमः Ś.7.30. -2 The instrumental or efficient cause (opp. उपादान); धर्मार्थकाममोक्षाणांनिमित्तान्यविरोधतः Bhāg.3.7.32. -3 Any apparent cause, pretext; निमित्तमात्रंभवसव्यसाचिन् Bg.11.33; निमित्तमात्रेणपाण्डवक्रोधेनभवितव्यम् Ve.1. -4 A mark, sign, token. -5 A butt, mark, target; निमित्तेदूरपातित्वेलघुत्वेदृढवेधने Mb.7.74.23; निमित्तादपराद्धेषोर्धानुष्कस्येववल्गितम् Śi.2.27. -6 An omen, prognostic (good or bad); निमित्तंसूचयित्वा Ś.1; निमित्तानिचपश्यामिविपरीतानिकेशव Bg.1.31; R.1.86; Ms.6.50; Y.1.203;3.171. -7 Means of knowledge; तस्यनिमित्तपरीष्टिः MS.1.1.3. -8 Function, ceremony; एतान्येवनिमित्तानिमुनीनामूर्ध्वरेतसाम् (कर्तव्यानि); Mb.12.61.6. (निमित्त is used at the end of comp. in the sense of 'caused or occasioned by'; किन्निमित्तोऽयमातङ्कः Ś.3. निमित्तम्, निमित्तेन, निमित्तान् 'because of', 'on occount of'.) -Comp. -अर्थः the infinitive mood (in gram). -आवृत्तिः f. dependence on a special cause. -कारणम्, हेतुः an instrumental or efficient cause. -कालः a specific time. -कृत् m. a crow -ज्ञ a. acquainted with omens (as an astrologar). -धर्मः 1 expiation. -2 an occasional rite. -नैमित्तिकम् (du.) cause and effect; निमित्तनैमित्तिकयोरयंक्रमः Ś.7.30. -परीष्टि f. scrutiny of the means (of knowing); तस्यनिमित्तपरीष्टिः MS.1.1.3. -मात्रम् the mere efficient cause or instrument; Bg.11.33. -विद् a. knowing good or bad omens. (-m.) an astrologer.
निमित्तकम् nimittakam 1 A cause. -2 Kissing.
निमित्तिन् nimittin a. Having a cause, influenced by (some cause or ground).(Apte)
निमित्तं, क्ली, (नि+ मिद् + क्त।संज्ञापूर्ब्बकत्वान्ननत्वम्।) हेतुः। (यथा, देवीभागवते।१।१८।५।“किंनिमित्तंमहाभाग ! निःस्पृहस्यचमांप्रति।जातंह्यागमनंब्रूहिकार्य्यंतन्मुनिसत्तम ! ॥”)चिह्नम्।इत्यमरः।३।३।७६॥शकुनः।यथा,“निमित्तानिचपश्यामिविपरीतानिकेशव ! ।इतिश्रीभगवद्गीता॥
निमित्तकं, क्ली, (निमित्त+ संज्ञायांकन्।)निमित्तनिश्चयादागतम्।चुम्बनम्।इतिशब्द-ला॥निमित्तञ्च॥
निमित्तकारणं, क्ली, (निमित्तंकारणम्।)समवायिकारणासमवायिकारणाभ्यांभिन्नम्।तृतीयकारणम्।यथा।घटंप्रतिकुलाल-दण्डचक्रसलिलसूत्रादि।इतिभाषापरिच्छेद-सिद्धान्तमुक्तावल्यौ॥
निमित्तकृत्, पुं, (निमित्तंस्वरुतेनशुभाशुभशकुनंकरोतीति।कृ+ क्विप्।) काकः।इतिराज-निर्घण्टः॥
निमित्तवित्, [द्] पुं, (निमित्तंशुभाशुभलक्षणंवेत्तीति।विद्+ क्विप्।) दैवज्ञः।गणकः।इतिहेमचन्द्रः।३।१४६॥
-- शब्दकल्पद्रुमः
निमित त्रि०नि + मि--क्त।समदीर्घविस्तारपरिमाणयुर्क्तनिघशब्देदृश्यम्।
निमित्त न०नि + मिद--क्त।“अनात्मनेपदनिमित्ते” पासूत्रनिर्देशान्ननदस्यनः।१हेतौ२चिह्नेचअमरः“निमित्तेषुचसर्वेषुह्यप्रमत्तोचभवेन्नरः” स्मृतिः“मयैवपूर्वंनिहताधार्त्तराष्ट्राःनिमित्तमात्रंभवसव्यसाचिन्।” गीता“अतःकालंप्रवक्ष्यामिनिमित्तंकर्मणामिह” ति०त०भविष्यपु०“मासपक्षतिथीनाञ्चनिमित्तानाञ्चसर्वशः।उल्लेखनमकुर्वाणोनतस्वफलभाग्भवेत्” ति०त०भविष्यपु०।ब्रह्माण्डे“निमित्तानिचशंसन्तिशुभाशुभफलोदयम्” “निमित्तंमनश्चक्षुरा-दिप्रवृत्तौ” हस्तामलकम्।शुभाशुभसूचके३शकुने“निमित्तानिचपश्यामिविपरीतानिकेशव!” गीता४फलेउद्देश्ये“निमित्तात्कर्मयोगे” वार्त्ति०निमित्त-मिहफलम्।५निमित्तनिश्चयेनैमित्तिकंनिमित्तनिश्च-यादागतम्।६शरव्येचशब्दार्थचि०स्वार्थेकतत्रार्थेसंज्ञायांकन्।निमित्तकचुम्बनेशब्दमाला।
निमित्तकारण न०कर्म०।नैयायिकमतेसमवायिकारणाऽ-समवामिकारणभिन्नकारणेतथाहिघटादौमृत्तिकादिसमवायिकारणम्कपालद्वयसंयोगोऽसमयवायिकार-णम्।कुलालचक्रदण्डसलिलसूत्रादिनिमित्तकारणम्।एवमदृष्टादिकालादिच।एवन्यत्रयथायथमुन्नेयम्।
निमित्तकृत् त्रि०निमित्तंशकुनंरुतेनकरोतिकृ--क्विप्तुक्।रवेणदुष्टादुष्टशकुनकारकेकाकेराजनि०।तस्यरवेणशकुनसूचकत्वात्तथात्वम्।काकरुतशब्दे१८४४पृ०दृश्यम्।
-- वाचस्पत्यम्
निमित्तबध पु०निमित्तेनरोधादिहेतुनाबधः।रोधादि-निमित्ते१गवादेर्वधेतत्रप्रायश्चित्तादिप्रा०त०उक्तंयथा“रोधादिनिमित्तकप्रायश्चित्तम्।तत्राङ्गिराः“रोधनेबन्धनेचापियोजनेचगवांरुजः।उत्पाद्यमरणंवापिनिमित्तीतत्रलिप्यते।पादञ्चरेद्रोधबधेद्वौपादौबन्धनेचरेत्।योजनेपादहीनंस्याच्चरेत्सर्वंनिपातने” ।निमित्तीलिप्यतइतियथाकथञ्चित्मरणनिमित्ततारतम्येन“योभूयआरभतेतास्मन्फलेविशेषः” इत्यापस्तम्बवचनात्पापविशेषेणंलिप्यतेतद्विशेषात्प्रायश्चित्तविशेषमाहपादञ्चरेदित्यादि।रोधःशीणायाःगोराहारप्रचारनिर्गमविरोधः।बन्धन-मयथाबन्धनमकालबन्धनञ्च।योजनंहलशकटादौयोजनंतत्रातिवाहादिनेतिशेषः।अत्रैवविषयेव्यवनः“प्राजापत्यद्वयंगोहत्याप्रायश्चित्तंरोधनबन्धनयोक्त्र-बधेपादवृद्ध्यानस्रानिलोमानिशिखावर्जंसशिखंवपनंत्रिषवणंगवानुगमनंसहशयनंसुमहत्तृणानिरथ्यासुचारयेत्व्रतान्तेब्राह्मणभोजनमिति” ।रोधन-बन्धनयोक्त्रबधइत्यादेरयमर्थःरोधनिमित्तकवधेप्राजा-पत्यस्यपादःप्रायश्चित्तंनखच्छेदनमात्रम्।बन्धन-निमित्तबधेप्राजापत्यस्यद्वौपादौनखानांलीम्नाञ्चछेदनम्।योक्त्रनिमित्तेचबधेप्राजापत्यपादत्रयंनखलोमशिखावर्जकेशच्छेदनञ्च।दण्डादिप्रहारबधेसम्पूर्णप्राजापत्यम्नखलोमकेशशिखाच्छेदनञ्चइति।एतद्विषयएवमिताक्षराधृतंसंवर्त्तवचनंतदेकवाक्य-त्वात्तद्यया“पादेऽङ्गलोमवपनंद्विपादेश्मश्रुणोऽपिच।त्रिपादेचशिम्नावर्जंवशिखन्तुनिपातने” ।अत्रप्राजापत्यस्यपादादित्वेकिंमानमितिचत्।पराशर-वचनम्“रोधनेतुचरेत्पादंबन्धनेचार्द्धमेवहि।योजनेपादहीनंस्यात्प्राजापत्यंनिपातने” ।“कृच्छ्रमज्ञानताड़ने” इतिवार्हस्वत्यात्।दण्डोऽत्रहस्त-प्रमाणोग्राह्यः।तदधिकेतुद्विगुणपायश्चित्तविधानात्।यथाअङ्गिराः“अङ्गुष्ठमात्रःस्थौल्येनबाहुमात्रःप्रमाणतः।सार्द्रश्चसपलाशश्चदण्डइत्यभिधीयते” ।“अस्यादूर्द्ध्वप्रहारेणयदिगांविनिपातयेत्।द्विगुणन्तुभवेत्तत्रप्रायश्चित्तमितिस्थितिः” ।सपलासःसपत्रः।एतद्वचनविषयएवच्यवनीक्तप्राजापत्यद्वयमितिएतच्चा-ज्ञानतःयथावृहस्पतिः“पादञ्चरेत्रोधवधेकृच्छ्रार्द्धंबन्धधातने।अतिवाहेचपादोनंकृच्छ्रमज्ञानताड़ने” ।अन्नानञ्चक्षीणायामक्षीणत्वभ्रमः।क्षैण्यज्ञानेतुपायिकमरणंज्ञात्वाप्रवृत्तस्यचान्द्रायणपादादिकम्।यथाहारीतः“नासाच्छेदनदाहेषुकर्णच्छेदनबन्धने।अतिदोहातिवाहाभ्यांकृच्छ्रंचान्द्रायणंचरेत्” हत्वेतिशेषः।कृच्छ्रंव्रतंतेनचान्द्रायणव्रतमित्यर्थः।इतिशूलपाणिमहामहोपाध्यायाः।भवदेवभट्टैस्तुनिपातनेकूपावदादिषुइतिव्याख्यातंतदपियुक्तंअन्यथातत्रपातजनकभयादिदर्शकस्यप्रायश्चित्तस्यानध्य-तद्धायापत्तेः।“शस्त्रादिनातुहत्वागांमानवंततपाक्षरेत्।रोधादिनात्वाङ्गिरनमापस्तम्बोक्तमेवचेति”बृहस्पत्युक्तंतत्रप्रयमादिपदामुष्टिलोष्ट्रलगुड़विषाग्न्या-दीनांप्रायिकमृत्युफलानांग्रहणम्।रोधादिनेतियथाकथञ्चिन्निमितमात्रस्य, बन्धादेरितिशूलपाणिव्याख्या-न्तराच्च।तस्मान्निपातनपरम्उभयपरम्।एतच्चरात्रौरक्षणार्थंरोधबन्धनव्यतिरिक्तविषयम्।“सायंसंयम-सनार्थन्तुनदुष्येद्रोधबन्धयोः” इतिअङ्गिरोवचनात्वन्धनेमिताक्षरायांविशेषमाहव्यासः“ननारि-केलैर्नचशाणतालैर्नचापिमौञ्जैर्नचबन्धशृङ्खलैः।एतैस्तुगावोनहिबन्धनीयाबद्ध्वातुतिष्ठेत्परशुंगृहीत्वा।कुशैःकाशैश्चबध्नीयात्स्थानेदोषविवार्जते” ।निमित्तिन्शब्देवक्ष्यमाणेमन्यूत्पादनदारा२हननेच।
निमित्तविद त्रि०निमित्तंशकुनंशुभाशुभसूचकंलक्षणंवेत्तिविद--क्विप्।निमित्तज्ञेदैवज्ञेहेमच०निमि-त्तज्ञादयोऽप्यत्र।“निमित्तज्ञस्तपोधनः” रघुः।
निमित्तिन् त्रि०निमित्तवस्त्यस्यइनि।निमित्तयुक्ते१कार्येप्रा०वि०उक्ते२बधकर्त्तृभेदेचयथा“कर्त्ताचपञ्चविधःकर्त्ताप्रयोजकोऽनुमन्ताअनुग्राहकोनिमित्तीचेति” ।निमित्तिनमाहविष्णुः“अन्यायेनगृहीतस्वोन्याय-मर्थयतेतुयः।यसुद्दिश्यत्यजेत्प्राणांस्तमाहुर्ब्रह्म-घातकम्” तल्लक्षणंप्रो०वि०उक्तं“उद्देश्यत्वेसतिहन्तुर्मन्यूत्पादकोनिमित्तो” इतिमन्यूत्पादनेनिमि-त्तमाहतत्रैववृद्धशा०“गोभूहिरण्यहरणेस्त्रीसम्ब-न्धकृतेऽपिच।यमुद्दिश्यत्यजेत्प्राणांस्तमाहुर्ब्रह्म-धातकम्” वृहस्मतिः“ज्ञातिमित्रकलत्रार्थंसुहृत्क्ष-त्रार्थमेवच।यमुद्दिश्यत्यजेत्प्राणांस्तभाहुर्ब्रह्मघा-तकम्।गोभूहिरण्यहरणेस्त्रीणांक्षेत्रगृहस्यच।यमुद्दिश्यत्यजेत्प्राणांस्तमाहुर्ब्रह्मथातकम्।गुर्वर्थंपितृमात्रर्थमात्मार्थमथवापुनः।यमुद्दिश्यत्यजेत्प्राणां-स्तमाहुर्ब्रह्मथातकम्” षट्त्रिंशन्मतमितिकृत्वापठितम्“आक्रोशितस्ताद्धितोवाधनैर्बापरिपीडितः।यमुद्दिश्यत्यजेत्प्राणांस्तगाहुर्ब्रह्मघातकम्” सत्रोद्दि-श्येतिसर्वत्रकीर्त्तनात्उद्देशाभावेनिमित्ततामा-त्रेणवधित्वंनास्तिअर्थादिहरणाक्रोशनताड-नादीनांमन्युकारणानामुपात्तत्वादेतेषाभभावेधनाद्यर्थंवृक्षारोहणादिनायेम्रियन्ते(यदिमह्यंघनंनदास्यसितदावृक्षारोहणेनमरिष्यामीतिं) तत्रकीर्त्तनमात्रेणनिमित्तबधोनास्तितथाचपठन्ति“अमम्बेनयःफश्चित्द्विजःप्राणान्परित्यजेत्।तणैषतद्भवेत्पाषंनतुयंपरिकी-र्तयेत्” अयम्बन्धेगेतिवाक्कृतादिसकलापराधसम्ब-न्धामावपरंयच्च“सम्बन्धेनविनादेव! शुष्कवादेनकोपितः” इतिभविष्यपुराणवचनंवार्षिकप्रायश्चित्त-विधायकंतत्वाक्कृतेतरापराधसम्बन्धाभावपरं“शुष्क-वादेनकोपितः” इत्यभिधानात्।एवंयत्राक्रोशनादौपश्चात्कृतेनापराधःतत्रापिनबधःयथावृहस्पतिः“आष्युष्टस्तयदाक्रोशँस्ताडितःप्रतिताडवम्।हत्वा-ततायिनञ्चैवनापराधीभवेन्नरः” ।शास्त्रविहितताड-मादौकृतेयत्रपुत्रशिष्यादिर्म्रियतेतत्रापिबधोनाख्येवतथाभविष्यपुराणे“पुत्रःशिष्यस्तथाभार्य्याशासितश्चेद्विनश्यति।नशास्तातत्रदोषेणलिप्यतेदेवसत्तम! ।अशास्त्रीयताडनादौभवत्येवयथामनुः।“पुत्रःशिष्यस्तथाभार्य्यादासीदासस्तुपञ्चमः।प्राप्ताप-राधास्ताह्याःस्यूरज्ज्वावेणुदलेनवा।अधस्तान्नुप्रहर्त्तव्यंनोत्तमाङ्गेकदाचन।अतोऽन्थथातुप्रहरँ-श्चौरस्याप्नोतिकिल्यिषम्” ।एवञ्चविहितदण्डाचरणेशास्त्रीयकरग्रहणेक्रियमाणेयदिम्रियतेतदापिवधोनास्त्येवदण्डादिशास्त्रविरोधान्निषेधाप्रवृत्तेः।वधनिमित्तिनस्तुप्रायश्चित्तंतत्रोक्तंयथा“निमित्तिनस्तुवचनात्त्रैवार्षिकंसम्बन्धे, असम्बन्धेवार्षिकंयथाभविष्ये“ससम्बन्धयदाविप्रोहत्वात्मानंमृतोगुह! ।निर्गुणःसहसाक्रोधादुमृहक्षेत्रादितोविभो! ।त्रैवार्षिकंव्रतंकुर्य्यात्ब्रह्मचर्व्यञ्चरन्वने” ।सम्बन्धशब्दोऽत्रधनसम्बन्धपरः।ताड़नादिनातिरस्कारेऽपित्रैवार्षिकमाहसएव“तिरस्कतोयदाविप्रोनिर्गुणोम्रियतेऽनच! ।सनिमित्तंयदाविप्रस्तदेदंशुद्धवेचरेद।त्रैवार्षिकंब्रह्मचर्य्यंकृत्वाशुध्येतविप्रहा” ।षनताडनादिसम्बन्धाभावेवाक्कलहमात्रेणमृतेवार्षिकमाहसएव“यसुद्दिश्यद्विजोहन्यात्ब्राह्मणंस्वयमेवहि।आत्मानंसहसाक्रोधात्तस्यकिन्नुभवेदिदम्।सम्बन्धेनविनादेव! शुष्कवादेनकोपितः।केशस्मश्रुनखादीनांकृत्वावैवपनंगुह! ।ब्रह्मचर्य्यञ्चरन्वीर! वर्षेणैकेनशुध्यति” एतत्त्रितय-कारणाभावेऽर्थलोभादिनामृतेप्रायश्चित्ताभावइतिप्रागुक्तम्” प्रा०चि०।
-- वाचस्पत्यम्
Saturday, October 5, 2013
Planetary position at the start of Mahabharata war.
The blogpost below was written in 2013, six years before I did my own analysis of Mahabharata references to deduce / validate the traditional date, 35 years before the start of the Kali Maha Yuga. The war started on October 23, 3136 BCE, in the year Krodhi.
Request readers to read my ebook.
https://www.amazon.in/MYTH-EPOCH-ARUNDHATI-NILESH-NILKANTH-ebook/dp/B07YVFNQLD/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_pl_foot_top?ie=UTF8
The specific chapter deciphering the date can be read here also
https://www.academia.edu/40802932/DATE_OF_MAHABHARATA_FROM_INTERNAL_EVIDENCES
Read my blog to know the contents and the links to ebook in amazon UK and USA
https://jayasreesaranathan.blogspot.com/2019/10/my-book-myth-of-epoch-of-arundhati-of.html
*****************
The reference to planets and their motion at the start of Mahabharata war pertains to Nimittha (निमित्त ) and the results connected with planetary motions or in other words astrology, and not exactly about the position of those planets as per astronomy. Therefore one must not take the reference to planets at face value.
तरिवर्णाः परिघाः संधौ भानुम आवारयन्त्य उत
trivarṇāḥ parighāḥ saṃdhau bhānum āvārayanty uta)
अहॊरात्रं मया दृष्टं तत कषयाय भविष्यति
23 अलक्ष्यः परभया हीनः पौर्णमासीं च कार्त्तिकीम
चन्द्रॊ ऽभूद अग्निवर्णश च समवर्णे नभस्तले
ahorātraṃ mayā dṛṣṭaṃ tat kṣayāya bhaviṣyati
23 alakṣyaḥ prabhayā hīnaḥ paurṇamāsīṃ ca kārttikīm
candro 'bhūd agnivarṇaś ca samavarṇe nabhastale)
राजानॊ राजपुत्राश च शूराः परिघबाहवः
rājāno rājaputrāś ca śūrāḥ parighabāhavaḥ)
saṃgrāmaṃ yojayet tatra tāṃ hy āhuḥ śakra devatām
18 सप्तमाच चापि दिवसाद अमावास्या भविष्यति
संग्रामं यॊजयेत तत्र तां हय आहुः शक्र देवताम
शनैश्चरः पीडयति पीडयन पराणिनॊ ऽधिकम
śanaiścaraḥ pīḍayati pīḍayan prāṇino 'dhikam)
Saturn posited in the third pada of Purva phalguni means it is in the 7th pada (of the 9-padas) of Leo.
From there it is afflicting both Rohini and Vishaka.
That means the exact drishti would fall on the 7th pada in Libra and 7th pada in Taurus.
The 7th pada in Libra is Vishaka 1st pada.
The 7th pada in Taurus is Rohini 4th pada.
The position of saturn could not be at any other place than 7th pada of Leo (3rd pada of P.Phalguni) because if it is one pada behind, it can not aspect Vishaka. If it is one pada forward, it can not aspect Rohini.
śanaiścaraḥ pīḍayati pīḍayan prāṇino 'dhikam (5-141-7)
अनुराधां परार्थयते मैत्रं संशमयन्न इव
anurādhāṃ prārthayate maitraṃ saṃśamayann iva (5-141-8)
बरह्मराशिं समावृत्य लॊहिताङ्गॊ वयवस्थितः (6-3-17)
brahmarāśiṃ samāvṛtya lohitāṅgo vyavasthitaḥ)
विशेषेण हि वार्ष्णेय चित्रां पीडयते गरहः (5-141-9)
viśeṣeṇa hi vārṣṇeya citrāṃ pīḍayate grahaḥ)
दिवश चॊल्काः पतन्त्य एताः सनिर्घाताः सकम्पनाः (5-141-10)
divaś colkāḥ patanty etāḥ sanirghātāḥ sakampanāḥ)
anurādhāṃ prārthayate maitraṃ saṃśamayann iva
अनुराधां परार्थयते मैत्रं संशमयन्न इव
viśeṣeṇa hi vārṣṇeya citrāṃ pīḍayate grahaḥ" (5-141-9)
STAR | THITHI | 1ST KARANA | 2ND KARANA |
Uttara phalguni | Navami | Taitila | Gara |
Hastha | Dasami | Vanija | Bhadra / Vishti |
Chitra | Ekadashi | Bava | Balava |
Swati | Dwadashi | Kaulava | Taitila |
Vishaka | Trayodashi | Gara | Vanija |
Anu radha | Chathurdashi | Bhadra | Sakuni |
Jyeshta | Amavasya | Chathuspad | Nagava |
Chitra | Ekadashi | Gara | Vanija |
Swati | Dwadashi | Bhadra | Sakuni |
Vishaka/ Anuradha? / Jyeshta | Trayodashi/ Amavasya | Chathuspad | Nagava |
From Taurus, 7th and 9th aspect falls on Scorpio and Capricorn respectively. In both cases, direct affliction of Sravana is possible but on Vishaka factor, approach towards Vishaka would be there.
ऐन्द्रं तेजस्वि नक्षत्रं जयेष्ठाम आक्रम्य तिष्ठति
aindraṃ tejasvi nakṣatraṃ jyeṣṭhām ākramya tiṣṭhati
vapūṃṣy apaharan bhāsā dhūmaketur iva sthitaḥ
François Desset, a Frenchman "cracks" an undeciphered writing of more than 4000 years, questioning the only invention of writing in Mesopotamia
François Desset has succeeded in deciphering Linear Elamite, a writing system used in Iran 4,400 years ago. In its archaic proto-Elamite version (from 3300 BC), it joins the two oldest writing systems known in the world, the proto-cuneiform of the Mesopotamians and the Egyptian hieroglyphics. Enough to modify the knowledge that we had until then on the origin of writing!
Linear Elamite "Inscription B" found on an engraved pebble from Susa, Iran, attributed to the sovereign Puzur-Shushinak (2150-2100 BC), (Louvre Museum) on the left; Linear Elamite "K inscription" on a Gunagi silver vase dated 1900/1880 BC. J.-C (Iran), right.
CREDITS: FRANÇOIS DESSET / SYLVIANE SAVATIER FOR SCIENCES ET AVENIRThe announcement - very rare - must have delighted the spirits of Father Barthélémy, Sylvestre de Sacy or even Champollion. French archaeologist François Desset, from the Archéorient Laboratory in Lyon, announced on November 27, 2020 that he had succeeded in deciphering inscriptions that are 4,400 years old! All were written in linear Elamite, a script used by the Elamites who then populated Iran. The scholars gathered online to learn about this discovery from the cultural property department of the Universita degli Studi di Padova in Padua (Italy) were enthusiastic. Here is indeed more than a century this writing system, used on the Iranian plateau in the ancient kingdom of Elam (now Iran) between the end of the 3 rd millennium and the beginning of 2th millennium before our era, escaped decryption, as is still the case for the Cretan linear A or the writing of the Indus valley. Between marks of admiration and congratulations from colleagues, the Frenchman, fresh from the University of Tehran (Iran) where he has been teaching since 2014, explained in English that: " This writing had been discovered for the first time on the ancient site of Susa (Iran) in 1901 and that for 120 years we had not been able to read what had been inscribed 4,400 years ago for lack of having found the key " . Something now done this year (thanks to the opportunity offered by quarantine in his apartment in Tehran and the collaboration of three other colleagues, Kambiz Tabibzadeh, Matthieu Kervran and Gian-Pietro Basello).
François Desset, archaeologist at the Archéorient Laboratory (Lyon), professor at the University of Tehran (Iran), framed by funerary columns found in tombs from the 3rd millennium BC, in Iranian Balochistan. © François Desset
"Contemporary writing systems"
The oldest examples of writing known to date come from Mesopotamia (current Iraq) and date back to the Bronze Age, around 3300 years BC: these are proto-cuneiform tablets. However, the decipherment of the linear Elamite calls this supremacy into question! " We discover that around 2300 BC, a parallel writing system existed in Iran, and that its oldest version - called Proto-Elamite writing , (3300 BC - 2900 BC). . -C) - dating back as far in time as the first Mesopotamian cuneiform texts says François Desset!. also, I can now say that writing did not first appear in Mesopotamia and then later in Iran: these two systems, the Mesopotamian proto-cuneiform and the Iranian proto-Elamite, were in fact contemporary! There was not a mother script of which the proto-Elamite would be the daughter, there were two sister scriptures. On the other hand, in Iran, there were not two independent writing systems either as specialists thought until then, with the proto-Elamite on one side and the linear Elamite on the other. , but the same writing which has been subjected to historical evolution and has been transcribed with variations in two distinct periods. "
This completely changes the perspective on the appearance of the writing system in the Middle East since it is now more accurate to say that Iran has developed its own writing system "at the same time" as in Mesopotamia and that the Iranian plateau should no longer be ignored in historical reconstructions dealing with the origins of writing ...
Green, the spread of writing Linear Elamite area in the 4th / 3rd e millennium BC © François Desset
It is this most recent form of Iranian writing (linear Elamite) that has been deciphered. At the present time, these are forty inscriptions from southern Iran, from the ancient city of Susa, via Fars (with the region of Kam Firouz and the plain of Marv Dasht, just next to the famous Achaemenid site of Persepolis) then the Iranian southeast with Shahdad and the famous site of Konar Sandal / Jiroft. Unlike the Mesopotamian cuneiform, which is a mixed writing system combining phonograms (signs transcribing a sound) with logograms (signs transcribing a thing, an idea, a word), the linear Elamite presents its unique characteristic. the world's 3 rdmillennium BC, to be a purely phonetic writing (with signs noting syllables, consonants and vowels). Used from around 3300 to 1900 BC, Iranian writing has evolved considerably between its oldest texts (the Proto-Elamite tablets) and the most recent (the linear Elamite texts), notably with a process "skimming". Of the 300 initial signs making it possible to note proper names in the proto-Elamite tablets (the vast majority of which is currently kept at the Louvre Museum), only 80 to 100 will remain in linear Elamite afterwards. , its most recent version. About a hundred signs used continuously for some 1400 years and generally written from right to left and top to bottom. "To work, we divided the forty or so texts available to us into 8 corpuses, depending on the origins and the periods. Because linear elamite was used from 2300 to 1900 BC under the reign of different rulers and dynasties and in different regions ", continues the archaeologist . Most of the texts are fairly repetitive royal inscriptions, dedicated to ancient gods, like : " I am [name], great king of [name] , son of [name of father] , I made this item for [name of god or person] " .
The click of the "gunagi vases"
For François Desset, the decryption "click" occurred in 2017 during the analysis of a corpus of 8 texts written on silver vases, qualified as "gunagi vases", dated around 2000-1900 BC. BC and from graves in the Kam-Firouz region (currently in a private collection in London). As these vases presented very repetitive sign sequences, standardized indeed, the archaeologist was able to identify the signs used to note the names of two rulers, Shilhaha and Ebarti II (both having reigned around 1950 BC). C.) and the main deity then worshiped in southwestern Iran, Napirisha .
Linear Elamite inscription in the upper part of this silver vase from Marv Dasht (Iran), dated 3rd millennium BC © François Desset
This first step of the decryption, published in 2018, culminated this year in the complete decryption, which will be scientifically published in 2021. Thus, as an example, the decryption of a magnificent silver vase discovered in the region of Marv Dasht in the 1960s and now kept at the National Museum in Tehran (Iran), where we can now read: " To the lady of Marapsha [toponym], Shumar-asu [her name], I did this silver vase. In the temple which will be famous by my name, Humshat, I have placed it as an offering for you with kindness " . The result of years of hard work. " I have been working on these writing systems since 2006," explains the researcher at Sciences et Avenir .I did not wake up one morning telling myself that I had deciphered linear elamite. It took me over 10 years and I was never sure I would get there. "
Linear Elamite writing notes a particular language, Elamite. It is a linguistic isolate that cannot be attached at present to any other known linguistic family, such as Basque. " Until this decipherment, everything concerning the populations occupying the Iranian Plateau came from Mesopotamian writings . These new discoveries will finally allow us to access the own point of view of the men and women occupying a territory they designated by Hatamti, while the term Elam by which we knew it until then, in fact only corresponds to an external geographical concept, formulated by their Mesopotamian neighbors ".
Terracotta cone with linear Elamite inscriptions dating from around 2500-2300 BC © François Desset
This breakthrough in decryption has important implications in three areas, continued François Desset: " on Iranian history; on the development of writing in Iran in particular, and in the Middle East in general, with considerations on continuity. between the Proto-Elamite and Linear Elamite writing systems; and on the Hatamtite (Elamite) language itself, now better documented in its earliest form and now made accessible for the first time by a writing system other than the Mesopotamian cuneiform (see box).
For Massimo Vidale, the Italian protohistorian organizer of the Padua conference, (whose Sciences et Avenir has just published the work on the site of " Hatra, the city of God-Solei " (Iraq), in his magazine dated December 2020 currently on newsstands), "France, by this new decryption, maintains its primacy in the" cracking "of old lost writing systems!" . As for François Desset, he has already embarked on the deciphering of the oldest state of Iranian writing, the proto-Elamite tablets, for which he considers to have now opened a "highway".
About the decryption of ancient scriptures
We must not confuse language (spoken sounds) and writing (visual signs). Thus, the same writing system can be used to note different languages. For example, the Latin alphabet currently makes it possible to transcribe French, English, Italian and Turkish for example. Likewise, the cuneiform writing of the Mesopotamians made it possible to transcribe several languages such as Akkadian (Semitic language), Old Persian (Indo-European language) or even Elamite and Sumerian (linguistic isolates). Conversely, a language can also be transcribed by different writing systems such as Persian (an Indo-European language) which is currently written as well with the Arabic alphabet in Iran (and sometimes the Latin alphabet with the surprising phenomenon of fingilish ), that the Cyrillic alphabet in Tajikistan whereas it was noted in the past with a cuneiform system in the Achaemenid period (ca. 520-330 BC, for Old Persia ) or the Aramaic alphabet in the Sassanid period (3 rd -7 thcentury of our era for Middle Persia). In the case of the Elamite language, it was known until now only through the cuneiform writing. With the decryption of linear Elamite writing carried out by François Desset, we now have access to this language through a writing system probably developed specifically for it and therefore better reflecting the phonological subtleties of this language than cuneiform writing.
Some great "decipherers":
Father Barthélémy (1716-1795) deciphered the Palmyrean alphabet in 1753, then in 1754 the Phoenician alphabet.
Jean-François Champollion (1790-1832) deciphered Egyptian hieroglyphics.
Henry Creswicke Rawlinson (1810-1895) one of the four co-decipherers of cuneiform writing noting the Akkadian language.
Michael Ventris (1922-1956) deciphered in 1952 the "linear B", one of the three writings discovered in Knossos (Crete) used in the 2 nd millennium BC to note an archaic form of Greek.
https://www.sciencesetavenir.fr/archeo-paleo/archeologie/breaking-the-code-en-craquant-une-ecriture-non-dechiffree-vieille-de-plus-de-4000-ans-un-francais-remet-en-cause-la-seule-invention-de-l-ecriture-en-mesopotamie_149795 (Google translate from French)
Manojavitva Siddhi -- Arun Kumar Upadhyay
मनस् -
मनोजव त्रि० जु--अच् मनोजवं वेगवत् नमनाय यस्मिन् ।१ पिवृतुल्ये अमरः । मनस इव जवो यस्य । २अतिवेगवति त्रि० ३ विष्णौ पु० । ४ अग्निजिह्वाभेदे स्त्रीजटा० । “काली कराली च मनोजवा च” शा० ति० ।५ दुर्गाशक्तिभेदे । --वाचस्पत्यम्
मनोजवः, त्रि, (मनो जवं वेगवद्यस्मिन् । यद्वा,मनो जवति पितायमिति कृत्वा धावत्यस्मिन्इति । जु सौत्रधातुः + अच् ।) पितृतुल्यः । तत्प-र्य्यायः । पितृसन्निभः ७ । इत्यमरः । ३ । १ । १३ ॥अतिशयवेगवान् । (यथा, मार्कण्डेये । २१ । ८ ।“तमन्वधावद्वेगेन तुरगोऽसौ मनोजवः ॥”)--शब्दकल्पद्रुमः
mano—java m. the speed or swiftness of thought, RV. ; ŚBr. |
mano—java mfn. swift as thought, RV. &c. &c. (am ind.; -tā f.) (Monier-Williams) |
अ॒क्ष॒ण्वन्त॒ः कर्ण॑वन्त॒ः सखा॑यो मनोज॒वेष्वस॑मा बभूवुः ।
आ॒द॒घ्नास॑ उपक॒क्षास॑ उ त्वे ह्र॒दा इ॑व॒ स्नात्वा॑ उ त्वे ददृश्रे ॥७ RV 10.71.7
“अक्षण्वन्तः अक्षिमन्तः । छन्दस्यपि दृश्यते 'इत्यक्षिशब्दादनङ्। ‘ अनो नुट्'इति नुट् । अनेन दृश्यते सर्वमित्यक्षि । यद्वा । तैजसत्वात् अन्येभ्योऽङ्गेभ्यो व्यक्ततरम् । तथा च श्रूयते - ‘ तस्मादेते व्यक्ततरे इव 'इति । तादृशाक्षियुक्ताः “कर्णवन्तः । कर्णो निकृत्तद्वारः। गर्भावस्थायामेव केनापि निर्मितबिल इत्यर्थः । यद्वा शरीरस्य शिरसो वोर्ध्वं गते उच्चैः स्थिते । कर्णविलक्षणाकाशवन्तः । तथा चाम्नायते - ऋच्छन्ती इव खे उदगन्ताम् 'इति । तादृशाः “सखायः । समानं ख्यानं ज्ञानं येषामिति सखायः । तेषु वाक्येषु बाह्येष्विन्द्रियेषु समानज्ञाना इत्यर्थः। ते “मनोजवेषु । मनसा गम्यन्ते ज्ञायन्त इति मनोजवाः प्रज्ञाद्याः । तेषु “असमाः अतुल्याः “बभूवुः भवन्ति । तेषु मध्ये केचित् “आदघ्नासः । आस्यशब्दस्य पृषोदरादित्वादाकारादेशः । आस्यदघ्ना आस्यप्रमाणोदका हृदा इवेति मध्यमप्रज्ञानाह। अथ “त्वे एके। सर्वनामत्वाज्जसः शीभावः। “उपकक्षासः । कक्षसमीपप्रमाणोदका हृदा इव । अल्पोदका इत्यर्थः । अनेनाल्पप्रज्ञानाह। तथा “त्वे एके “स्नात्वाः । स्नातेः कृत्यार्थे त्वन्प्रत्ययः (पा. सू. ३.४.१४ )। स च ‘ अर्हे कृत्यतृचश्च' ( पा. सू. ३.३.१६९ ) इत्यर्हार्थे च भवति । स्नानार्हा अक्षोभ्योदकाः “हृदाइव “ददृशे दृश्यन्ते । अनेन महाप्रज्ञानाह। उः पूरणः । ‘ अक्षिमन्तः कर्णवन्तः सखायोऽक्षि चष्टेः ' (निरु. १. ९) इत्यादिकं निरुक्तमत्र द्रष्टव्यम् ॥
हृ॒दा त॒ष्टेषु॒ मन॑सो ज॒वेषु॒ यद्ब्रा॑ह्म॒णाः सं॒यज॑न्ते॒ सखा॑यः ।
अत्राह॑ त्वं॒ वि ज॑हुर्वे॒द्याभि॒रोह॑ब्रह्माणो॒ वि च॑रन्त्यु त्वे ॥८ RV 10.71.8
सखायः समानख्यानाः “ब्राह्मणाः “हृदा बुद्धिमतां हृदयेन “तष्टेषु निश्चितेषु परिकल्पितेषु “मनसो “जवेषु गन्तव्येषु वेदार्थेषु गुणदोषनिरूपणाः “यत् यदा “संयजन्ते संगछन्ते । यजिरत्र संगतिकरणवाची । “अत्र अस्मिन् ब्राह्मणसंघे “त्वम् अविज्ञातार्थमेकं पुरुषं “वेद्याभिः वेदितव्याभिः विद्याभिः प्रवृत्तिभिर्वा “वि “जहुः विशेषेण परित्यजन्ति । “अह इति विनिश्चये । “ओहब्रह्माणः । ऊह्यमानं ब्रह्म विद्याश्रुतिमतिबुद्धिलक्षणं येषां ते तथोक्ताः । तादृशास्त एके विद्वांसः “वि “चरन्ति यथाकामं वेदार्थेषु विनिश्चयार्थं प्रवर्तन्ते । उः प्रसिद्धौ। ‘ हृदा तष्टेषु मनसां प्रजवेषु' (निरु. १३. १३ ) इत्यादिकं निरुक्तं द्रष्टव्यम् ॥
--सायणभाष्यम्
Summary
Mind started before creation of universe. Unseen abstract source called Brahma desired to create world. That is called mind in vacuum (śvo-vasīyasa).
Mind has 3 aspects-Input (effect of other parts-knowledge), analysis (organized thinking), action. At each of the 5 levels or stages of world, creative Mana called Manotā was in 3 parts. 5 levels are called 5 Maṇḍalas-Svayambhū (infinite space, 100 billion galaxies in visible universe), Prameṣṭhī (largest brick, galaxy), Saura (solar system), Chāndra (sphere containing moon orbit, gravitational zone of earth), Bhū (Earth).
Human mind has 7 types of input, 7 types of output which are called its tongue. Out of 7 types of input, 5 are perceived by senses by 5 Prāṇas. Other 2 are Asat (invisible, beyond perception).
Summary of all modern definitions of Mind is given in Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad (1/5/3).
Mind receives information from 5 organs of sense, and after analysis acts through 5 organs of action. So, it is counted among both types of organs.
Man is image of world in the sense that Human brain has same number 100 billion particles (neurons) as there are particles (stars) in our galaxy) or particles (galaxies) in visible space (Tapah loka) as given in Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa (12/3/2/1-5, 10/4/4/2).
There are 4 inner controls of the body called -Antahkaraṇa (inner instrument). These are-mana, buddhi, ahankāra, chitta.
Mana is random fluctuation or interaction among brain cells.
Buddhi is organisation or link among fluctuations of a kind. That organisation is in 4 stages called 4 steps of Vāk (thought, word).
Ahankāra is unification of all cells of body which identify itself with that body. It is like population register of a country. Foreign cells are identified and countered by antibody formation.
Chitta is consciousness at each point. It controls action of all parts of body. One is natural instinct of each part, called Vāsanā. Other is selection of useful reaction which will continue body functions for whole life. Chit = point space. Chiti = arrangement of objects in space to form a system. Chetanā is agency which can do Chiti. Chitta is place of Chetanā. At every point space (Chit), there is part of source matter called Ānanda. Perceptible part of that is called Sat. That is Sat-Chit-ānanda.
Mind has a dynamic link with space with speed of light, more intimately with sun and moon modified by attraction of planets up to Saturn, as described in 2 chapters of Yajurveda, many purāṇas etc. Its mechanism is not understood in modern science, though there is a thought called Anthropic principle.
Modern medical science divides physiology is many systems for understanding functions of body-Anatomy (bone & muscle structure), digestive system, respiratory system, blood circulation, nervous system. Āyurveda and Yoga consider human body as image of 7 lokas, called 7 Koṣa (sheaths) of body. Its centres are 7 Chakras. These koṣas are-Annamaya (anatomy), Prāṇa-maya (energy), Manomaya (mind), Jñāna-maya, Vijñāna-maya, Chitta-maya, Ātmā-maya. That is another subject.
Original references are in attached article.
Manojavitva Siddhi
(abstract) -A.K. Upadhyay
Manojavitva Siddhi has been indicated in Pātañjala yoga-sūtra (3/47-48) and is based on Ṛgveda (10/71/7-8) whose devatā is Bṛhaspati and aim is to acquire knowledge. Literal meaning of Manojavitva is to improve the speed of mind. Hanumān is called Manojava-meant to have speed of mind. But it is explained as coordination between organs of action and knowledge in Taittirīya upaniṣad, śīkśāvallī. Thus, Maojavitva means improving speed of mind which will help in acquiring, retaining and processing of knowledge. To understand the meaning and methods, it is necessary to understand the definition of ‘mana’ at different levels and its link with buddhi, ahankāra and Chiita. Then we can discuss the techniques and their basis. This is the subject of current article.
1.Definition of Mana-This is translated as mind in English but it has no clear cut definition in modern science. A summary of meanings and theories is given from website-
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Mind
The mind is the term most commonly used to describe the higher functions of the human brain, particularly those of which humans are subjectively conscious, such as personality, thought, reason, memory, intelligence and emotion. Although other species of animals share some of these mental capacities, the term is usually used only in relation to humans. It is also used in relation to postulated supernatural beings to which human-like qualities are ascribed, as in the expression "the mind of God."There are many theories of what the mind is and how it works, dating back to Plato, Aristotle and other Ancient Greek philosophers. Pre-scientific theories, which were rooted in theology, concentrated on the relationship between the mind and the soul, the supposed supernatural or divine essence of the human person. Modern theories, based on a scientific understanding of the brain, see the mind as a phenomenon of psychology, and the term is often used more or less synonymously with consciousness.
The question of which human attributes make up the mind is also much debated. Some argue that only the "higher" intellectual functions constitute mind: particularly reason and memory. In this view the emotions - love, hate, fear, joy - are more "primitive" or subjective in nature and should be seen as different in nature or origin to the mind. Others argue that the rational and the emotional sides of the human person cannot be separated, that they are of the same nature and origin, and that they should all be considered as part of the individual mind.In popular usage mind is frequently synonymous with thought: it is that private conversation with ourselves that we carry on "inside our heads" during every waking moment of our lives. Thus we "make up our minds,""change our minds" or are "of two minds" about something. One of the key attributes of the mind in this sense is that is a private sphere. No-one else can read our thoughts or "know our mind."
Modern quantum interpretation started with David Bohm who is an authority on modern Quantum Mechanics. The summary under 7 headings is on website-
http://www.quantum-mind.co.uk/david-bohm-c56.html
1. Introduction-David Bohm & the Implicate Order, 2. Information, quantum theory & the brain - Basil Hiley, 3. Brain & Mathematics - Karl Pribram, 4. Mind, Matter & Active Information –Paavo Pylkkanen, 5. Consciousness in Bohm's Ontology –Paavo Pylkkanen
6. Are our spaces made of words? - Jonathan Edwards - Ideas related to David Bohm's and active information
7. Can quantum analogies help us to understand the process of thought –Paavo Pylkkänen
Essence is that Mind is a quantum fluctuation which is cause of all processes of world. State or order of fluctuations indicate information content but only a part is active which can be used. Usable information is linked by a logical chain.
2. Vedic concept of mana-In vedic literature,Manais not only defined, its 4 stages and 4 parts are classified and even its atom has been sated. The stages are-
(1) Śvo-vasīyasa mana-This is the original root of world. Original source of world was uniform called Rasa. There was none other-He wanted to become multi-fold. From that desire, chain of creation started. That desire is the root ‘mana’. It lived in vacuum (śvah), so it is called Śvo-vasīyasa mana.
असतोऽधि मनोऽसृज्यत। मनः प्रजापतिं असृजत। प्रजापतिः प्रजा असृजत। तद् वा मस्येव परमं प्रतिष्ठितम्। यदिदं किं च। तत् एतत् श्वोवस्यसं नाम ब्रह्म। व्युच्छन्ती व्युच्छन्त्यस्मै वस्यसी वस्यसी व्युच्छति। प्रजायते प्रजया पशुभिः। प्र परमेष्ठिन् मातां आप्नोति। य एवं वेद॥ (तैत्तिरीय ब्राह्मण, २/२/९/१०)
तैत्तिरीय उपनिषद्-असद्वा इदमग्र आसीत्। ततो वै सदजायत।तदात्मानँ स्वयमकुरुत। तस्मात् तत् सुकृतमुच्यत इति। यद्वै तत् सुकृतं रसो वै सः। (२/७)
असन्नेव स भवति। असद् ब्रह्मेति वेद चेत्। अस्ति ब्रह्मेति चेद्वेद।....... सोऽकामयत्। बहुस्यां प्रजायेयेति। स तपोऽतप्यत। स तपस्तप्त्वा इदं सर्वमसृजत यदिदं किं च। तत् सृष्ट्वा तदेवानुप्राविशत्। तदनुप्रविश्य सच्च त्यच्चाभवत्। निरुक्तं चानिरुक्तं च। निलयनं चानिलयनं च। विज्ञानं चाविज्ञानं च। सत्यं चानृतं च सत्त्यमभवत्। (२/६)
सत्यं ज्ञानमनन्तं ब्रह्म। यो वेद निहितं गुहायां परमे व्योमन्। सोऽश्नुते सर्वान्कामान् सह ब्रह्मणा विपश्चितेति। तस्माद्वा एतस्मादात्मन् आकाशः सम्भूतः।आकाशाद् वायुः। वायोरग्निः। अग्नेरापः। अद्भ्यः पृथिवी। पृथिव्या ओषधयः। ओषधीभ्योऽन्नम्। अन्नात् पुरुषः। स वा एष पुरुषोऽन्नरसमयः। (२/१)
First there was duality-called variously-Puruṣa-Prakṛti, Agni-soma etc. Here, distinction starts with-(1) Nirukta(distinct, separate) and Anirukta (no separation from surroundings), (2) Nilayana (with space) and Anilayan (without distinct boundary, (3) Vijñāna (usable information, logical link) avijñāna-not perceived logically. (4) Satya (within perception be senses), Anṛta(beyondṛta or perception).
(2) Agni-jihva mana-Each distinct body (agni) has 7 fluctuations called jihvā (tongue). 7 fluctuations are outgoing (archi) and 7 receiving (lelāyate). Manavahalso means 14 as total fluctuations of mana are 14-
अग्नि-जिह्वा मनवःसूर-चक्षसो विश्वेनो देवा अवसा गमन्निह। (ऋग्वेद, १/९८/७, यजुर्वेद, २५/२०)
काली कराली च मनोजवा च सुलोहिता या च सुधूम्र-वर्णा।
स्फुलिङ्गिनी विश्वरुची च देवी लेलायमाना इति सप्त जिह्वाः॥ (मुण्डकोपनिषद्,१/२/४)
सप्त प्राणा प्रभवन्ति तस्मात्, सप्तार्चिषः समिधः सप्त होमाः।
सप्त इमे लोका येषु चरन्ति प्राणा गुहाशया निहिताः सप्त सप्त। (मुण्डकोपनिषद्,२/१/८)
पञ्च स्रोतोऽम्बुं पञ्च योन्युग्र वक्रां, पञ्च प्राणोर्मिं पञ्च बुद्ध्यादि मूलाम्।
पञ्चावर्तां पञ्च दुःखौघ वेगां, पञ्चाशद्भेदां पञ्च पर्वां अधीमः॥ (श्वेताश्वतरउपनिषद्, १/५)
नव द्वारे पुरे देही हंसो लेलायते बहिः। वशी सर्वस्य लोकस्य स्थावरस्य चरस्य च। (श्वेताश्वतरउपनिषद्,३/१८)
These 7 archis (flames) have given rise to 7lokas, homa, samidha etc and 7 prāṇas. But at other places, 5 parvas and 5 prāṇas have been stated. Out of 7 stages (parva), first 2 are abstract and beyond perception-Primordial mana and division into different pairs. Distinct 5 parvas are-Svāyambhuva (universe), Parameṣṭhī (galaxy), Saura (solar system), Chāndra(sphere containing moon’s orbit) and Bhū (earth). Correspondingly, there are 7 prāṇas out of which first 2 are beyond perception-Parorajā(beyond lokas, Ṛṣi prāṇa) and Pitara prāṇa . Other 5 are visible prāṇas-prāṇa, aprāṇa, samāṇa, vyāṇa, udāṇa.
(3) Atoms of mana-Continuos spread of mana is Sarasvatī (rasa-vatī = with rasa or fluid which cannot be counted). Countable parts are Gaṇeśa (gaṇana = to count). There are 1011 particles of that mana at each level, so Gaṇeśahas been called Kharva (1011, short height). Śatapatha brāhmaṇagives division of 1 muhūrtta (15 parts of day of 12 hours = 48 minutes) by 15 at each level. After 8 divisions by 15, we get svedāyana which is about 11,20,000 parts of 1 second. 15 such units is lomagartta = about 75000 parts of 1 second. Then it tells that number of lomagarttas in 1 years (samvatsara) is same as number of lomagarttas (cells) in human body, which is same as number of nakṣatras(stars within galaxy, or galaxy within universe). Fluctuation of each cell of mind is its atom. Thus-
1011 = cells in brain = stars in galaxy = galaxies in universe.
एभ्यो लोमगर्त्तेभ्य ऊर्ध्वानि ज्योतींष्यान्। तद्यानि ज्योतींषिः एतानि तानि नक्षत्राणि। यावन्त्येतानिनक्षत्राणि तावन्तो लोमगर्त्ताः। (शतपथ ब्राह्मण- १०/४/४/२)
पुरुषो वै सम्वत्सरः। ।१॥ ..दश वै सहस्राण्याष्टौ च शतानि सम्वत्सरस्य मुहूर्त्ताः। यावन्तो मुहूर्त्तास्तावन्ति पञ्चदशकृत्वः क्षिप्राणि। यावन्ति क्षिप्राणि, तावन्ति पञ्चदशकृत्वः एतर्हीणि। याबन्त्येतर्हीणि, तावन्ति पञ्चदशकृत्व इदानीनि। यावन्तीदानीनि तावन्तः पञ्चदशकृत्वः प्राणाः। यावन्तः प्राणाः, तावन्तोऽनाः। यावन्तोऽनाः तावन्तो निमेषाः। यावन्तो निमेषाः तावन्तो लोमगर्त्ताः। यावन्तो लोमगर्त्ताः तावन्ति स्वेदायनानि। यावन्ति स्वेदायनानि, तावन्त एते स्तोका वर्षन्ति। (शतपथ ब्राह्मण १२/३/२/१-५)
Vaiṣeśika sūtras of Kaṇāda start with 6 padārthas born of viśeṣa Dharmas - Dravya, Guṇa, Karma, Sāmānya, Viśeṣa, Samavāya. Among them, Dravya are of 9 types-Pṛthivī, Āpah, Teja, Vāyu, Ākāśa, Kāla, Dik, Ātmā, Mana.Ātmā and mana are not visible and inferred by their links with body and objects as in case of Vāyu. Each is formed of numerous indivisible paramāṇus.
वैशेषिक सूत्र-
धर्म विशेष प्रसूताद् द्रव्य-गुण-कर्म-सामान्य-विशेष-समवायानां पदार्थानां साधर्म्य-वैधर्म्याभ्यां तत्त्व ज्ञानात् निःश्रेयसम्।(१/१/४)
पृथिव्यापस्तेजो वायुराकाशं कालोदिगात्मा मन इति द्रव्याणि(१/१/५)
सदकारणवन्नित्यम्। तस्य (परमाणोः) कार्यं (घटादि) लिङ्गम्। व्यक्तात् व्यक्तस्य निष्पत्तिः प्रत्यक्ष प्रामाण्यात्। अवयवावयविप्रसङ्गस्तावदनुभूयते स यदि निरवधिः स्यात् तदा मेरु-सर्षपयोःपरिमाणभेदो न स्यात्, अनन्तावयवारब्धत्वादविशेषात्। तस्मान्निरवयवं द्रव्यमवधि सएव परमाणुः। नित्यम् परिमण्डलम्। (४/१/१-५)
तत्रात्मा मनश्चाप्रत्यक्षे। (८/१/२) आत्मन्यात्मनसोः संयोग विशेषादात्म प्रत्यक्षम्। तथा द्रव्यान्तरेषु प्रत्यक्षम्। असमाहितान्तःकरणा उपसंहृत समाधयस्तेषाञ्च। तत् समवायात् कर्मगुणेषु। आत्म समवायादात्मगुणेषु। (९/१/११-१५)
आत्मेन्द्रियार्थ सन्निकर्षे ज्ञानस्य भावोऽभावश्च मनसो लिङ्गम्।(३/२/१)
तस्य द्रव्यत्व नित्यत्वे वायुना व्याख्याते।(३/२/२)प्रयत्नायौगपद्याज् ज्ञानायौगपद्याच्चैकम्।(३/२/३)
तदभावादणु मनः।(७/१/२३)
(4) Vyakti-mana-Each individual has an internal control of the system which includes mana. The relation between body and its controller are explained in Gitā and Kaṭhopaniṣad.
कठोपनिषद्-आत्मानं रथिनं विद्धि शरीरं रथमेव तु। बुद्धिं तु सारथिं विद्धि मनः प्रग्रहमेव च॥ (१/३/३)
इन्द्रियाणि हयानाहुर्विषयाँस्तेषु गोचरान्। आत्मेन्द्रिय मनो युक्तं भोक्तेत्याहुर्मनीषिणः॥४॥
इन्द्रियेभ्यः परं मनो मनसः सत्त्वमुत्तमम्। सत्त्वादपि महानात्मा महतोऽव्यक्तमुत्तमम्॥ (२/३/७)
गीता-इन्द्रियाणि मनो बुद्धिरस्याधिष्ठानमुच्यते। एतैर्विमोहयत्येष ज्ञानमावृत्य देहिनम्॥ (३/४०)
इन्द्रियाणि पराण्याहुरिन्द्रियेभ्यः परं मनः। मनसस्तु परा बुधिर्यो बुद्धेः परतस्तु सः॥ (३/४२)
Indriyas (organs of sense and action) are horses which move in their subjects. Mana is the rope which binds or controls the horses. Buddhiis the sārathi(driver), and ātmāis owner of chariot in form of body. Gītā also tells the Indriyasare base for mana and buddhi. Indriyasare beyond or above (their subjects), mana is above them, buddhiis above mana and above buddhi also is That (ātmā).All 5 types of senses are received through mana, without mana, they will be inactive. Then mana directs the 5 organs of action to work. Thus it is above Indriyas or link among them. बृहदारण्यक उपनिषद्-त्रीण्यात्मने ऽकुरुतेति मनो वाचं प्राणं तान्यात्मने ऽकुरुतान्यत्र मना अभूवं नादर्शमन्यत्र मना अभूवं नाश्रौषमिति मनसा ह्येव पश्यति मनसा शृणोति। कामः सङ्कल्पो विचिकित्सा श्रद्धाऽश्रद्धा धृतिऽधृति र्हीर्धीर्भीरिति एतत्सर्वं मन एव तस्मादपि पृष्ठत उपस्पृष्टो मनसा विजानाति सः कश्च शब्दो वागेव सैषा ह्यन्तमात्तैषाहि न प्राणोऽपानो व्यान उदानः समानो ऽनइत्येतत्सर्वं प्राण एवैतन्मयो वा अयमात्मा वाङ्मयो मनोमयः प्राणमयः॥ (१/५/३)
Sparśa(touch, heat)---tvachā (skin) Pāda (feet)
Rasa (taste) ----Jihvā (tongue) Upastha(Reproduction)
Gandha (smell) --- nāsā (nose) Gudā (discharge of mala)
2 unseen pair of links-In addition to above 5 pairs of input-output of mana, there are 2 more pairs-making a total of 14 tongues of agni which make the mana.
(1) Light link-Our mind (prajñāna mana) and buddhi(vijñāna mana) are having continuous link with sun and moon. Link with sun is by light rays, link of moon is by gravitation-both at speed of light. These are two-way links till time of death. After death, link from man goes, but does not return. Moon has two roles-it modifies effect of star back-ground whose image is mahāna-ātmā-that way moon has been born from grand mana. Then, its gravitational influence creates ripples in brain fluid, whose effect goes and returns in about 1.7 second-almost 1 nimeṣa (twinkling of eye)-affecting prajñāna mana. That link is called śraddhā-sūtra. Buddhiis controller of mana and resides in heart, place of vijñāna-ātmā. From heart till crown of head, it goes by suṣumnā till ājñā-chakrabehind eyebrow centre and then by Brahma-randhra to sahasrāra. For each man, these are separate, called aṇu-patha (bye-lanes). From that, it goes till sun by sunrays-that is mahā-patha (highway).
सूर्य आत्मा जगतस्तथुषश्च (वाजसनेयी यजुर्वेद,७/४२)
तदेते श्लोका भवन्ति-अणुः पन्था विततः पुराणो मां स्पृष्टोऽनुवित्तो मयैव। तेन धीरा अपियन्ति ब्रह्मविदः स्वर्गं लोकमिव ऊर्ध्वं विमुक्ताः।८।
तस्मिञ्छुक्लमुत नीलमाहुः पिङ्गलं हरितं लोहितं च। एष पन्था ब्रह्मणा ह्यानुवित्तस्तेनैति ब्रह्मवित्पुण्यकृत्तैजसश्च॥ (बृहदारण्यक उपनिषद् ४/४/८,९)
अथ या एता हृदयस्य नाड्यस्ताः पिङ्गलाणिम्नस्तिष्ठन्ति शुक्लस्य नीलस्य पीतस्य लोहितस्येत्यसौ वा आदित्यः पिङ्गल एष शुक्ल एष नील एष लोहितः॥१॥ तद्यथा महापथ आतत उभौ ग्रामौ गच्छन्तीमं चामुं चामुष्मादित्यात्प्रतायन्ते ता आसु नाडीषु सृप्ता आभ्यो नाडीभ्यः प्रतायन्ते तेऽमुष्मिन्नादित्ये सृप्ताः॥२॥ ..... अथ यत्रैतदस्माच्छरीरादुत्क्रामति अथैतैरेव रश्मिभिरूर्ध्वमाक्रामते सओमिति वा होद्वामीयते स यावत्क्षिप्येन्मनस्तावदादित्यं गच्छत्यतद्वै खलु लोकद्वारं विदुषा प्रपदनं निरोधोऽवदुषाम् ॥५॥ (छान्दोग्य उपनिषद् ८/६/१,२,५)
ब्रह्मसूत्र (४/२/१७-२०)-१-तदोकोऽग्रज्वलनं तत्प्रकाशितद्वारो विद्या सामर्थ्यात्तच्छेषगत्यनुस्मृतियोगाच्च हार्दानुगृहीतः शताधिकया।
२. रश्म्यनुसारी। ३. निशि नेति चेन सम्बन्धस्य यावद्देहभावित्वाद्दर्शयति च। ४. अतश्चायनेऽपि दक्षिणे।
रूपं रूपं मघवाबोभवीति मायाः कृण्वानस्तन्वं परि स्वाम्।
त्रिर्यद्दिवः परिमुहूर्त्तमागात् स्वैर्मन्त्रैरनृतुपा ऋतावा॥(ऋग्वेद ३/५३/८)
त्रिर्ह वा एष (मघवा=इन्द्रः, आदित्यः = सौर प्राणः) एतस्या मुहूर्त्तस्येमां पृथिवीं समन्तः पर्य्येति। (जैमिनीय ब्राह्मण उपनिषद् १/४४/९)
(2) Mind link-This is with speed of Mind or mana, called Manojava.
The first link maintains body functions, second link is link of ātmā-paramātmā. Its center is sun. The link of sun till earth-moon has been called Suşumnā. That is modified by influence of other planets whose names and nature is given in Yajurveda (15/15-19, 17/58, 18/40) and also explained in Kūrma purāṇa, (part 1, 41/2-8), Matsya purāṇa (128/29-33), Vāyu purāṇa (53/44-50), Vişņu, Brahmāṇḍa (1/2/2465-72) etc. The links with planets are-
Planet Mercury Venus Earth-moon Mars Jupiter Saturn Nakśatra
Nāḍī Viśvakarmā Viśvavyachā Suşumnā, Sanyadvasu Arvāgvasu Svara Harikeśa
(Viśvaśravā)
Directions-South West ---- North Up ------ East
वाजसनेयी यजुर्वेद, अध्याय १५-अयं पुरो हरिकेशः सूर्यरश्मिस्तस्य रथगृत्सश्च रथौजाश्च सेनानीग्रामण्यौ। पुञ्जिकस्थला च क्रतुस्थला चाप्सरसौ दृङ्क्ष्णवः पशवो हेतिः पौरुषेयो वधः प्रहेतिस्तेभ्यो नमो अस्तु ते नोऽवन्तु ते नो मृडयन्तु ते यं द्विष्मो यश्च नो द्वेष्टि तमेषां जम्भे दध्मः॥१५॥ अयं दक्षिणा विश्वकर्मा तस्य रथस्वनश्च रथेचित्रश्च सेनानी ग्रामण्यौ। मेनका च सहजन्या चाप्सरसौ यातुधाना हेती रक्षांसि प्रहेतिस्तेभ्यो नमो अस्तु ते नोऽवन्तु ते नो मृडयन्तु ते यं द्विष्मो यश्च नो द्वेष्टि तमेषां जम्भे दध्मः॥१६॥ अयं पश्चाद्विश्वव्यचास्तस्य रथप्रोतश्चासमरथश्च सेनानी ग्रामण्यौ। प्रम्लोचन्ती चानुम्लोचन्ती चाप्सरसौ व्याघ्रा हेतिः सर्पाः प्रहेतिस्तेभ्यो नमो अस्तु ते नोऽवन्तु ते नो मृडयन्तु ते यं द्विष्मो यश्च नो द्वेष्टि तमेषां जम्भे दध्मः॥१७॥ अयमुत्तरात् संयद्वसुस्तस्य तार्क्ष्यश्चारिष्टनेमिश्च सेनानी ग्रामण्यौ। विश्वाची च घृताची चाप्सरसावापो हेतिर्वातः प्रहेतिस्तेभ्यो नमो अस्तु ते नोऽवन्तु ते नो मृडयन्तु ते यं द्विष्मो यश्च नो द्वेष्टि तमेषां जम्भे दध्मः॥१८॥ अयमुपर्यर्वाग्वसुस्तस्य सेनजिच्च सुषेणश्च सेनानी ग्रामण्यौ। उर्वशी च पूर्वचित्तिश्चाप्सरसाववस्फूर्जन् हेतिर्विद्युत् प्रहेतिस्तेभ्यो नमो अस्तु ते नोऽवन्तु ते नो मृडयन्तु ते यं द्विष्मो यश्च नो द्वेष्टि तमेषां जम्भे दध्मः॥१९॥
अध्याय १७-सूर्यरश्मिर्हरिकेशः पुरस्तात् सविता ज्योतिरुदयाँ अजस्रम्। तस्य पूषा प्रसवे याति विद्वान्त्सम्पश्यन्विश्वा भुवनानि गोपाः॥५८॥
अध्याय १८-सुषुम्णः सूर्यरश्मिश्चन्द्रमा गन्धर्वस्तस्य नक्षत्राण्यप्सरसो भेकुरयो नाम।
स न इदं ब्रह्म क्षत्रं पातु तस्मै स्वाहा वाट् ताभ्यः स्वाहा॥४०॥
कूर्म पुराण, पूर्वविभाग, अध्याय ४१-
तस्य ये रश्मयो विप्राः सर्वलोक प्रदीपकाः। तेषां श्रेष्ठाः पुनः सप्त रश्मयो ग्रहयोनयः॥२॥
सुषुम्नो हरिकेशश्च विश्वकर्मा तथैव च। विश्वव्यचाः पुनश्चान्यः संयद्वसुरतः परः॥३॥
अर्वावसुरिति ख्यातः स्वराडन्यः प्रकीर्तितः। सुषुम्नः सूर्यरश्मिस्तु पुष्णाति शिशिरद्युतिम्॥४॥
तिर्यगूर्ध्वप्रचारोऽसौ सुषुम्नः परिपठ्यते। हरिकेशस्तु यः प्रोक्तो रश्मिर्नक्षत्र पोषकः॥५॥
विश्वकर्मा तथा रश्मिर्बुधं पुष्णाति सर्वदा। विश्वव्यचास्तु यो रश्मिः शुक्रं पुष्णाति नित्यदा॥६॥
संयद्वसुरिति ख्यातः स पुष्णाति च लोहितम्। बृहस्पतिं प्रपुष्णाति रश्मिरर्वावसुः प्रभोः।
शनैश्चरं प्रपुष्णाति सप्तमस्तु सुराट् तथा॥७॥
एवं सूर्य प्रभावेण सर्वा नक्षत्रतारकाः। वर्धन्ते वर्धिता नित्यं नित्यमाप्याययन्ति च॥८॥
मत्स्य पुराण, अध्याय १२८-सुषुम्ना सूर्यरश्मिर्या क्षीणम् शशिनमेधते। हरिकेशः पुरस्तात्तु यो वै नक्षत्रयोनिकृत्॥२९॥
दक्षिणे विश्वकर्मा तु रश्मिराप्याययद् बुधम्। विश्वावसुश्च यः पश्चाच्छुक्रयोनिश्च स स्मृतः॥३०॥
संवर्धनस्तु यो रश्मिः स योनिर्लोहितस्य च। षष्ठस्तु ह्यश्वभू रश्मिर्योनिः सा हि बृहस्पतेः॥३१॥
शनैश्चरं पुनश्चापि रश्मिराप्यायते सुराट्। न क्षीयन्ते यतस्तानि तस्मान्नक्षत्रता स्मृता॥३२॥
क्षेत्राण्येतानि वै सूर्यमातपन्ति गभस्तिभिः। क्षेत्राणि तेषामादत्ते सूर्यो नक्षत्रता ततः॥३३॥
ब्रह्माण्डपुराण, पूर्वभाग, अध्याय२४-
रवेरश्मि सहस्रं यत्प्राङ्मया समुदाहृतम्। तेषां श्रेष्ठाः पुनः सप्त रश्मयो ग्रह-योनयः॥६५॥
सुषुम्णो-हरिकेशश्च-विश्वकर्मा तथैव च। विश्वश्रवाः पुनश्चान्यः संपद्-वसुरतः परः॥६६॥
अर्वावसुः पुनश्चान्यः स्वराडन्यः प्रकीर्त्तितः। सुषुम्णः सूर्य-रश्मिस्तु क्षीण शशिन-मेधयेत्॥६७॥
तिर्यगूर्ध्व प्रचारोऽसौ सुषुम्णः परिकीर्त्तितः। हरिकेशः पुरस्ताद्य ऋक्ष-योनिः स कीर्त्यते॥६८॥
दक्षिणे विश्वकर्मा तु रश्मिन्वर्द्धयते बुधम्। विश्वश्रवास्तु यःपश्चाच्छुक्र-योनिः स्मृतो बुधैः॥६९॥
सम्पद्वसुस्तु यो रश्मिः स योनि-र्लोहितस्य तु। षष्ठ-स्त्वर्व्वावसू रश्मि-र्योनिस्तु स बृहस्पतेः॥७०॥
शनैश्चरं पुनश्चापि रश्मि-राप्यायते स्वराट्। एवं सूर्य प्रभावेण ग्रह-नक्षत्र-तारकाः॥७१॥
वर्त्तन्ते दिवि ताः सर्वा विश्वं चेदं पुन-र्जगत्। न क्षीयन्ते यतस्तानि तस्मा-न्नक्षत्र संज्ञिताः॥७२॥
क्षेत्राण्येतानि वै पूर्व-मातपन्ति गभस्तिभिः। तेषां क्षेत्राण्य-थादत्ते सूर्यो नक्षत्र कारकाः॥७३॥
Seven pairs of links of mana and consequent stages of Jñāna-ajñāna are explained in Mahopaniṣad, chapter 5. That causes 7Bhūmis of jñāna and 7 of ajñāna. These correspond to modes of input and 7 of output for mana. The chapter further explains these traits. Person with all 7 senses is called Avadhūta, whose qualities have been told by Dattātreya in Avadhūtopaniṣad.
तस्य सप्तधा प्रान्तभूमिः प्रज्ञा। (योग सूत्र, २/२७)
महोपनिषद्, अध्याय ५-अज्ञान भूः सप्त पदाज्ञभूः सप्त पदैव हि॥१॥ स्वरूपावस्थिति-र्मुक्तिस्तद्भ्रंशो ऽहन्त्ववेदनम्॥२॥
शुद्ध सन्मात्र संवित्तेः स्वरूपान्नचलन्ति ये। राग द्वेषादयो भावास्तेषां नाज्ञत्व संभवः॥३॥
यः स्वरूप परिभ्रंशश्चेत्यार्थे चितिमज्जनम्। एतस्माद् अपरो मोहो न भूतो न भविष्यति॥४॥
अर्थादर्थान्तरं चित्ते याति मध्ये तु या स्थितिः। साध्वस्त मननाकारा स्वरूप-स्थितिरुच्यते॥५॥
स शान्त सर्व सङ्कल्पा या शिलावदवस्थितिः। जाग्रन्निद्रा विनिर्मुक्ता सा स्वरूप स्थितिः परा॥६॥
अहन्तांशे क्षतेशान्ते भेद निष्पन्द चित्तता। अजडाया प्रचलतितत्स्वरूप-मिमीरितम्॥७॥
बीज जाग्रत्तथा जाग्रन्महाजाग्रत्तथैव च। जाग्रत्स्वप्नस्तथा स्वप्नः स्वप्न जाग्रत्सुषुप्तिकम्॥८॥
इति सप्त विधो मोहः पुनरेष परस्परम्। श्लिष्टो भवत्यनेकाग्र्यं श्रृणु लक्षणमस्यतु॥९॥
प्रथमं चेतनं यत्स्याद् अनाख्यं निर्मलं चितः। भविष्यत्चित्तजीवादिनाम-शब्दार्थ भाजनम्॥१०॥
बीजरूप स्थितं जाग्रद्बीज जाग्रत्तदुच्यते। एषा ज्ञप्ते-र्नवावस्थात्वं जाग्रत्संस्थितिं श्रृणु॥११॥
नव प्रसूतस्य परादयं चाहमिदंमम। इति यः प्रत्ययः स्वस्थस्तज्जाग्रत्प्रागभावनात्॥१२॥
अयं सोऽहमिदं तन्म इति जन्मान्तरोदितः। पीवरः प्रत्ययः प्रोक्तो महाजाग्रदिति स्फुटम्॥१३॥
अरूढ-मथवा रूढं सर्वथा तन्मयात्मकम्। यज्जाग्रतो मनो राज्यं यज्जाग्रत्स्वप्न उच्यते॥१४॥
द्वि चन्द्र शुक्तिका रूप्य मृगतृष्णादि भेदतः। अभ्यासं प्राप्य जाग्रत्तस्त्स्वप्नो नाना विधो भवेत्॥१५॥
अल्प कालं मया दृष्टमेतन्नोदेति यत्र हि। परामर्शः प्रबुद्धस्य स स्वप्न इति कथ्यते॥१६॥
चिरं संदर्शनाभावाद-प्रफुल्लं बृहद्वचः। चिरकालानुवृत्तिस्तु स्वप्नो जाग्रदिवोदितः॥१७॥
स्वप्न-जाग्रदिति प्रोक्तं जाग्रत्यपि परिस्फुरत्। षडवस्था परित्यागो जडा जीवस्य या स्थितिः॥१८॥
भविष्य दुःख बोधाढ्या सौषुप्तिः सोच्यते गतिः। जगत्तस्यामवस्थाया-मन्त-स्तमसिलीयते॥१९॥
सप्ता-वस्थाइमाःप्रोक्ता मया ज्ञानस्य वै द्विज। एकैका शत संख्याऽत्र नाना विभव-रूपिणी॥२०॥
इमां सप्त पदां ज्ञान भूमिमाकर्णया-नघ। नानया ज्ञातया भूयो मोह-पङ्के निमज्जति॥२१॥
वदन्ति बहु भेदेन वादिनो योग-भूमिकाः। ममत्वभिमता नून-मिमा एव शुभप्रदाः॥२२॥
अवबोधं विदुर्ज्ञानं तदिदं सप्त-भूमिकम्। मुक्तिस्तु ज्ञेयमित्युक्ता भूमिका सप्तकात्परम्॥२३॥
ज्ञानभूमिः शुभेच्छाख्या प्रथमा समुदाहृता। विचारणा द्वितीया तु तृतीया तनु मानसी॥२४॥
सत्त्वापत्ति-श्चतुर्थीस्यात्ततोऽसंसक्ति-नामिका ।पदार्थ-भावना षष्ठी सप्तमी तुर्यगा स्मृता॥२५॥
3. Antahkaraṇa-There are 4 inner controls of the body called -Antahkaraṇa (inner instrument).These are-mana, buddhi, ahankāra, chitta.
मनो बुद्धिरहङ्कारश्चित्तमित्यन्तःकरण चतुष्टयम्। (शारीरकोपनिषद्,२)
मनो बुद्धिरहङ्कारश्चित्त चेति चतुष्टयम्। (वराहोपनिषद्,१/४)
मनो बुद्ध्योश्चित्ताहङ्कारौ चान्तर्भूतौ।(त्रिशिखब्राह्मणोपनिषद् १/४)
Mana is random fluctuations which are infinite. Buddhiis ordered sequence. Manais Parā-vāk, buddhi is visible thought called paśyantī. After that it is translated into words as per store of language system in mind-called madhyamā-vāk. Final spoken or written words are vaikharī-vāk. Buddhi results in formation of Vākya(sentence) which describes an event (vākayā in Arabic). When we generalize, it becomes Kāvya (poem, creation). Buddhi analyses various alternatives, then it decides a course of action. Till analysis, it is avyavasāyī. After decision, it is vyavasāyātmikā.
मनः सम्पद्यते लोलं कलनाऽऽकलनोन्मुखम्। कलयन्ती मनःशक्तिरादौ भावयति क्षणात्॥ (महोपनिषद्, ५/१४६)
बुद्धयो वै धियस्ता योऽस्माकंप्रचोदयादित्याहुर्मनीषिणः। (मैत्रायणी उपनिषद् ६/७)
बुद्धिकर्मेन्द्रियप्राणपञ्चकैर्मनसाधिया। शरीरं सप्तदशभिः सुसूक्ष्मं लिङ्गमुच्यते। (शारीरकोपनिषद्,११)
व्यवसायात्मिका बुद्धिरेकेह कुरुनन्दन। बहुशाखा ह्यनन्ताश्च बुद्धयोऽव्यवसायिनाम्॥ (गीता, २/४१)
अपरिमिततरमिव हि मनः परिमिततरमेव हि वाक्। (शतपथ ब्राह्मण १/४/४/७)
चत्वारि वाक् परिमिता पदानि तानि विदुर्ब्राह्मणा ये मनीषिणः।
गुहा त्रीणि निहिता नेङ्गयन्ति तुरीयं वाचो मनुष्या वदन्ति॥ (ऋग्वेद १/१६४/४५)
परायामङ्कुरीभूय पश्यन्त्यां द्विदलीकृता॥१८॥
मध्यमायां मुकुलिता वैखर्या विकसीकृता॥ (योगकुण्डली उपनिषद् ३/१८, १९)
अक्षरं परमो नादः शब्दब्रह्मेति कथ्यते। मूलाधारगता शक्तिः स्वाधारा बिन्दुरूपिणी॥२॥
तस्यामुत्पद्यते नादः सूक्ष्मबीजादिवाङ्कुरः। तां पश्यन्तीं विदुर्विश्वं यया पश्यन्ति योगिनः॥३॥
हृदये व्यज्यते घोषो गर्जत्पर्जन्यसंनिभः। तत्र स्थिता सुरेशान मध्यमेत्यभिधीयते॥४॥
प्राणेन च स्वराख्येन प्रथिता वैखरी पुनः। शाखापल्लवरूपेण ताल्वादिस्थानघट्टनात्॥५॥ (योगशिखोपनिषद् ३/२-५)
Buddhi is organization of random thoughts of mind. It is related to vāk and vākya which is organization of words (śabda). Words have 4 sources-nāma (name), ākhyāta (definition), upasarga(pre-fix), nipāta (usage) as per nirukta. Its meanings change as per 7 sansthā (set-up) which can be called script, language, geography, tradition/history, science of physical (ādhibhautika) and 2 parallels in cosmic (ādhidaivika) and inner (ādhyātmika) systems. Thus, word has 4x7 = 28 forms of meanings. Parallel to that, buddhi also has 28 weaknesses or strength in sānkhya philosophy.
इतीमानि चत्वारि पदजातान्यनुक्रान्तानि। नामाख्याते चोपसर्ग-निपाताश्च (निरुक्त १/१२)
सर्वेषां तु स नामानि कर्माणि च पृथक् पृथक्। वेद शब्देभ्य एवादौ पृथक् संस्थाश्च निर्ममे॥(मनु स्मृति, १/२१)
यास्सप्त संस्था या एवैतास्सप्त होत्राः प्राचीर्वषट् कुर्वन्ति ता एव ताः। (जैमिनीय ब्राह्मण उपनिषद् १/२१/४)
छन्दांसि वाऽअस्य सप्त धाम प्रियाणि । सप्त योनीरिति चितिरेतदाह । (शतपथ ब्राह्मण, ९/२/३/४४, वाज. यजु ,१७/७९)
अध्यात्ममधिभूतमधिदैवं च (तत्त्व समास, ७)
किं तद्ब्रह्म किमध्यात्मं किं कर्म पुरुषोत्तम। अधिभूतं च किं प्रोक्तमधिदैवं किमुच्यते॥१॥
अक्षरं ब्रह्म परमं स्वभावो ऽध्यात्म उच्यते। भूतभावोद्भवकरो विसर्गः कर्म संज्ञितः॥३॥
अधिभूतं क्षरो भावः पुरुषस्याधिदैवतम्। (गीता, अध्याय ८)
अष्टाविंशतिधा अशक्तिः (तत्त्व-समास, १३) अशक्तिरष्टाविंशतिधा (सांख्य सूत्र,३/२८)
एकादशेन्द्रिय वधाः सह बुद्धेर्विपर्ययात्तुष्टि सिद्धीनाम् (सांख्य कारिका,४९)
Thus, yoga has 28 obstacles to sādhanā(practice)-5 viṣaya (subject) + 5 vṛttis (traits) of buddhi+ 5 kleṣa (complications)+ 13 citta-vikṣepa (diversions).
श्रोत्रं चक्षुः स्पर्शनं च रसनं घ्राणमेव च। अधिष्ठाय मनश्चायं विषयानुपसेवते (गीता १५/९)
वृत्तयः पञ्चतय्यः क्लिष्टाक्लिष्टाः। (योग सूत्र, १/५, सांख्य सूत्र २/३३)
प्रमाण विपर्यय विकल्प निद्रा स्मृतयः। (योग सूत्र, १/६), अविद्याऽस्मिता राग द्वेषाभिनिवेशाः पञ्च क्लेषाः। (योग सूत्र, २/३)
व्याधि-स्त्यान संशय प्रमादाऽलस्याविरति भ्रान्तिदर्शनाऽलब्ध भूमिकत्वानवस्थिततत्त्वानि चित्त-विक्षेपास्तेऽन्तरायाः। (योगसूत्र २/३०), दुःखदौर्मनस्याऽङ्गमेजयत्व श्वास प्रश्वासाः विक्षेपसहभुवः।(योगसूत्र २/३१)
Ahankāra is feeling of individuality. That is reason of creation of a single body of man or any being called Puryaṣṭaka (structure of 8 parts). Each cell of our body knows that it is part of this body only and rejects foreign cells/viruses or blood of different blood-group. However, when this feeling ignores our link with outside world, it becomes pride and is obstruction to our existence and rise.
अहङ्कार कलायुक्तं बुद्धिबीजसमन्वितम्। तत्पुर्यष्टकमित्युक्तं भूतहृत्पद्मषट्पदम्॥(महोपनिषद्, ५/१५३)
प्रकृतेः क्रियमाणानि गुणैः कर्माणि सर्वशः। अहङ्कारविमूढात्मा कर्ताहमिति मन्यते॥ (गीता ३/२७)
Chitta word has several forms linked to each other. Chit is point space-almost of zero volume, chin-mātra = negligible. Their arrangement is called chiti (design). The agency which causes this arrangement is called chetanā (consciousness). No order or design can be created by inanimate object. By natural reasons a house cannot be created, it can decay or be destroyed. But bricks can be joined in a design only by a conscious being having chetanā. Joint of components (bricks) is called Iṣṭakā-chiti(brick design). The whole world itself is biggest design which is a form of Devī. Designer is Brahma. The ordering cause is chain of Mana-buddhi-ahankāraand their place is chitta. Yoga is control of natural actions (vṛttis) of chitta. Chitta can move out of body also. A part of chittacan enter another body to control it. Mover or controller of chitta is ātmā. Each chit (point) of world has something which can be sensed-that is sat. It also contains ānanda which is original creator of world as rasa. Brahmais collection of each such chit, so it is called Sat-chit-ānanda.
यच्चेतयमाना अपश्यंस्तस्माच्चितयः। (शतपथ ब्राह्मण ६/२/२/९)
तद्यत् पञ्च चितीश्चिनोत्येताभिरेवैनं तत्तनूभिश्चिनोति यच्चिनोति तस्माच्चितयः। (शतपथ ब्राह्मण ६/१/२/१७)
चेतव्यो ह्यासीत्तस्माच्चित्यः। (शतपथ ब्राह्मण ६/१/२/१६)
बुद्ध्या बुध्यति, चित्तेन चेतयत्यहङ्कारेणाहङ्करोति (नारद परिव्राजक उपनिषद् ६/४)
दुर्गा-सप्तशती, अध्याय ५-इन्द्रियाणामधिष्ठात्री भूतानां चाखिलेषु या। भूतेषु सततं तस्यै व्याप्तिदेव्यै नमो नमः॥७७॥
चितिरूपेण याकृत्स्नमेतद् व्याप्य स्थिता जगत्। नमस्तस्यै ॥७८॥ नमस्तस्यै ॥७९॥ नमस्तस्यै नमो नमः॥८०॥
प्रजापतिर्वै चित्पतिः। (शतपथ ब्राह्मण ३/१/३/२२) चेतव्यो ह्यासीत्तस्माच्चित्यः।(शतपथ ब्राह्मण ६/१/२/१६)
इष्टकर्त्तारमध्वरस्य प्रचेतसमिति। अध्वरो वै यज्ञः। प्रकल्पयितारं यज्ञस्य प्रचेतसमित्येतत्।(शतपथ ब्राह्मण ७/३/१/३३)
तद्यदिष्टात् समभवंस्तस्माद् इष्टकाः। (शतपथ ब्राह्मण ६/१/२/२२)
योगश्चित्तवृत्तिनिरोधः। (योग सूत्र १/२) देशबन्धश्चित्तस्यधारणा। (योगसूत्र३/१)
हृदये चित्तसंवित् । (योग सूत्र ३/३४), प्रत्ययस्य परचित्तज्ञानम्। (योग सूत्र ३/१९)
बन्ध कारण शैथिल्यात् प्रचार संवेदनाच्च चित्तस्य परकाया प्रवेशः। (योग सूत्र ३/३८)
यदा विनियतंचित्तम् आत्मन्येवा-वतिष्ठते। (गीता६/१८) योगिनो यतचित्तस्य युञ्जतो योगमात्मना (गीता, ६/१९)
यत्रोपरमते चित्तं निरुद्धं योग सेवया। (गीता, ६/२०) अथ चितं समाधातुं न शक्नोषि मयि स्थिरम्। (गीता, १२/९)
Out of 7 bhūmis of mind, only 5vṛttis of chitta are linked to senses which are controlled by yoga practice.वृत्तयः पञ्चतय्यः क्लिष्टाऽक्लिष्टाः। (योग सूत्र १/५) प्रमाण विपर्यय विकल्प निद्रा स्मृतयः। (योग सूत्र १/६)
4. Methods of Manojava-(1) Yoga-sūtra-In Yoga-sūtra, Patañjalihas stated these steps-
(a) We should progress from 5 outer methods –yama, niyama, āsana, prāṇāyāma and pratyāhārato3 inner methods-dhāraṇā, dhyāna, samādhi- त्रयमन्तरङ्ग पूर्वेभ्यः। (योगसूत्र ३/७)
Yama = stopping harmful practices.
Niyama= following correct conduct. First was negative, this is positive.
Āsana = physical postures, Prāṇāyāma =control of breath.
Pratyāhāra = withdrawing mind from unnecessary thought/acts.
(b) Inner methods-After sufficient practice of outer methods, we are ready or inner ones. First is dhāraṇā which means joining chitta with an object of consideration or on a particular chakra of body. Continuation of dhāraṇā is called dhyāna. When we forget the self as almost zero and think only about artha (meaning) of subject, it becomes samādhi. Joining all these 3 is called samyama. By conquering that samyama, we get light of prajñā (intuition). That samyama can be applied to different bhūmi (objects, targets).
देशबन्धश्चित्तस्य धारणा। (योगसूत्र ३/१), तत्र प्रत्यैकतानता ध्यानम्। (योगसूत्र ३/२)
तदेवार्थमात्रनिर्भासं स्वरूपशून्यमिव समाधिः। (योगसूत्र ३/३), त्रयमेकत्र संयमः। (योगसूत्र ३/४)
तज्जयात् प्रज्ञालोकः। (योगसूत्र ३/५), तस्य भूमिषु विनियोगः। (योगसूत्र ३/६)
We have indriya-jaya(control of senses/organs) by samyama on grahaṇa (tendency to acquire viṣayas), svarūpa (nature of indriyas), asmitā(feeling of self), anvaya (3 guṇas-sattva, raja, tama-which affect by brightness, action,existence) and arthavattva (actually getting objects).
ग्रहण स्वरूपास्मितान्वयार्थवत्व संयमादिन्द्रिय जयः। (योगसूत्र ३/४७)
By control of indriyas, body gets speed of mind, action without organs (karaṇa = instrument) and control of pradhāna (root nature). This is called manojavitva. Alternate meaning is that mind becomes very fast and its speed is stated to be far more than speed of light.
ततो मनोजवित्वं विकरणभावः प्रधानजयश्च। (योगसूत्र ३/४८)
(2) Kriyā-yoga-Yoga sūtra has defined kriyā-yoga as combination of 3-tapa (hard work), svādhyāya (study) and Īśvara-praṇidhāna (surrender to God).
तप-स्वाध्यायेश्वर-प्रणिधानानि-क्रियायोग। (योगसूत्र२/१)
However, its methods are based on tāntrika structure of body. We have 5 chakras in spinal cord of body which is parallel to 5 levels of cosmic creation and 5 elements-space, air (motion), teja(radiation), ap (soma, dispersed gas etc) and pṛthvī(compact body as earth). There are 2 higher levels in mind-ājñā-chakraat centre of brain is start of duality (mind/body) as duality of matter/ energy in space. Sahasrāra at crown of head is image of abstract source which has thousands alternate paths of creation. We feel each chakra and move our chittafrom lowest chakra to highest. The details can be understood and practiced only under a Guru. It is summarized by Śankarāchārya in Saundarya-laharī-
महीं मूलाधारे कमपि मणिपूरे हुतवहम्, स्थितं स्वाधिष्ठाने हृदि मरुतमाकाशमुपरि।
मनोऽपि भ्रूमध्ये सकलमपि भित्त्वा कुलपथम्, सहस्रारे पद्मे सह रहसि पत्या विहरसि (विहरसे)-सौन्दर्य-लहरी, ९
(3) Vedic method-The same method is explained in Vedasunder name Manojava.
अक्षण्वन्तः कर्णवन्तः सखायो मनोजवेष्व समा बभूवुः।
आदध्नास उपकक्षास उत्वेह्रदा इव स्नात्वा उत्वे ददृशे॥ (ऋग्वेद,१०/७१/७)
हृदा तष्टेषु मनसो जवेषु यद्ब्राह्मणाः संयजन्ते सखायः।
अत्राह त्वं विजहुर्वेद्याभि रोह ब्रह्माणो विचरन्तु त्वे॥(ऋग्वेद, १०/७१/८)
These verses mean that man cannot be like manojavaeven with subjects felt through eyes, ears etc. Only by placing these moving friends within heart we have manojavitva. The friends are-indriya (organs), viśaya (objects) and their bandha (knot).
The methods are summarized in Gajendra-mokṣa stotraof Bhāgavata purāṇa (8/3). Gajendra was proud of his power, but he was caught firmly in water (ocean of world) by Grāha (crocodile), i.e subjects of organs. By vyavasita (single pointed) buddhi, he placed mana in heart and as per remains of past life teachings, he did japa (mental recitation) of supreme mantra (ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय)-
श्री शुक उवाच-एवं व्यवसितो बुद्ध्या समाधाय मनो हृदि। जजाप परमं जाप्यं प्राग्जन्मन्यनुशिक्षितम्।१।
गजेन्द्र उवाच-ॐ नमो भगवते तस्मै यत एतच्चिदात्मकम्। पुरुषायादि बीजाय परेशायाभिधीमहि।२। (भागवत पुराण, ८/३)
Step-by step rise is symbolized by offer of dūrvā (grass) which grows from each knot. Similarly, man grows afresh from each step of his rise.
काण्डात्काण्डात् प्ररोहन्ति परुषः परुषस्परि। एवा नो दूर्वे प्रतनु सहस्रेण शतेन च। (वाजसनेयी यजुर्वेद १३/२०)
अयं (प्राणः) वाव मा धूर्वीदिति यदब्रवीद् अधूर्वीन् मेति तस्माद् धूर्वा, धूर्वा ह वै तां दूर्वेत्याचक्षते परोऽक्षम् (शतपथ ब्राह्मण,७/४/२/१२)
The rise is from gross body formed by food to the highest abstract level-
उतामृतत्वस्येशानो यदन्नेनातिरोहति। (पुरुष सूक्त २)
Indus-Magan Connection. Indian Ocean seafaring trade in the early Bronze Age -- Dennys Frenez
Labyrinth Indus Script hieroglyph of Lothal signifies meḍhā 'tangle, labyrinth' rebus मेधा medhā 'yajna, dhanam, riches'
Tablets L-76 and L-77 from Lothal show a labyrinth or a tangle as a graphical hieroglyph. I submit that this is a variant of the endless knot hieroglyph.
The Meluhha word to signify this hieroglyph: Marathi. meḍhā m. ʻ curl, snarl, twist or tangle in cord or thread ʼ.(CDIAL 10312) Rebus; medhā 'dhanam, yajna' dhana, Naigh. ii, 10.; oblation, any sacrifice MBh. (Monier-Williams)
Double-humped camel, bronze in Met Museum is an Indus Script hieroglyph karabha 'camel' rebus karba 'iron'
Daniel Potts (2005) presents a detailed argument and concludes that the origins of the double-humped camel lie on the high steppes of Inner Asia: "...in view of the ever-increasing body of evidence for ties between Central Asia and Elam (Amiet 1986: 146-207), and between Elam and Assyria and Mari in the early second millennium BCE (Potts 1999: 166ff), it is entirely possible that this was the period in which the peoples of the Near East first became aware of C. bactrianus. Whatever the case may be, it is now clear that the Bactrian camel has little beyond its name in common with the region of Bactria, and that its origins lie much further east, on the high steppes of Inner Asia. That it came to play an important role further west, already by the Assyrian period if not earlier, seems clear. The raison d’être behind the Assyrian interest in the Bactrian camel, and behind its later occurrence as far west as Anatolia, lies in the breeding of Bactrian-dromedary hybrids, the strength of which was un-surpassed by any other domestic animal, apart from the elephant, in the ancient Near East." (Article appended; for the full pdf text of The Silk Road, Vol. 3, No. 1 (June 2005), click here.)
The double-humped camel is presented as hieroglyph in the list of tributes presented by Musiri (a region of Kurdistan in Iraq) to Shalamaneser III (858-824 BCE) on the third register of Black Obelisk of British Museum. The list of hieroglyphs are in Indus Script cipher and signify metalwork and precious stone treasures presented as tributes.
karabhá m. ʻ camel ʼ MBh., ʻ young camel ʼ Pañcat., kalabhá -- ʻ young elephant or camel ʼ Pañcat. 1. Pk. karabha -- m., ˚bhī -- f., karaha -- m. ʻ camel ʼ, S. karahu, ˚ho m., P. H. karhā m., Marw. karhau JRAS 1937, 116, OG. karahu m., OM. karahā m.; Si. karaba ʻ young elephant or camel ʼ.2. Pa. kalabha -- m. ʻ young elephant ʼ, Pk. kalabha -- m., ˚bhiā -- f., kalaha -- m.; Ku. kalṛo ʻ young calf ʼ; Or. kālhuṛi ʻ young bullock, heifer ʼ; Si. kalam̆bayā ʻ young elephant ʼ.Addenda: karabhá -- : OMarw. karaha ʻ camel ʼ.(CDIAL 2797) Rebus: karba 'iron' (Tu.Kannada)
Double-humped camel in Nubra valley, Ladakh, Jammu & Kashmir, India.
Bactrian camel

Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex
Bronze. Dimensions: 3.5 in. (8.89 cm) Date: ca. late 3rd–early 2nd millennium B.C.E. Accession Number: 53.117.1
Bactrian Camels and Bactrian-Dromedary Hybrids
Daniel Potts
University of Sydney
If the Silk Road may be described as “the bridge between Eastern and Western culures,” then the Bactrian camel should rightfully be considered the principal means of locomotion across that bridge. Yet there is a great deal of misinformation concerning the Bactrian camel and its relatives, particularly in the ancient Near Eastern literature. This paper explores some of the problems surrounding Camelus bactrianus and the little-known hybrids of the Bactrian with the Arabian dromedary (Camelus dromedarius).
Zoologists nowadays tends to favor the idea that Camelus bactrianus and dromedarius are descendants of two different sub-species of Camelus ferus (Peters and von den Driesch 1997: 652), and modern research suggests that the original habitat of the wild, two-humped camel extended from the great bend of the Yellow River in northwestern China through Mongolia to central Kazakhstan (Schaller 1998: 154; Nowak 1999: 1078; Bannikov 1976: 399) generally at elevations of 1500-2000 m. above sea-level. Although some scholars have suggested the original habitat of C. ferus may have extended as far west as the Caspian Sea, this is unlikely. If this were true, we should expect to find C. ferus faunal remains at prehistoric and early historic sites around the Caspian, but this is not the case. Moreover, to suggest that the natural distribution areas of the wild two-humped camel extended so far to the west flies in the face of everything that is known about the physiology and environmental adaptations of C. bactrianus (see below).
The survival of C. ferus in Inner Asia was long suspected but no firm evidence was available until N.M. Przewalski killed and described several specimens in 1873 (Camelus ferus Przewalski 1878 [?]). C. ferus has been described as “relatively small, lithe, and slender-legged, with very narrow feet and a body that looks laterally compressed” (Schaller 1998: 152).2 C. ferus has “low, pointed, coneshaped humps - usually about half the size of those of the domestic camel in fair condition” (Bannikov 1976: 398). Representations of camels in the rock art of Palaeolithic caves in eastern Mongolia, such as Chojt-Zenker Cave, show what are believed to be C. ferus (Peters and von den Driesch 1997: 653, 661).3 (Fig. 1) C. ferus were still hunted in the medieval era in the Khotan, Turfan, Tarim, Lob and Katak regions of Inner Asia, and in Mongolia (Roux 1959-60: 50-51), while 18th-century Chinese records attest to the presence of wild camels on the northern and western edges of the Chinese empire (Lehmann 1891: 99). Small numbers are present in the region to this day (Heptner, Nasimovic and Bannikov 1966: 85-94; Bannikov 1976; Schaller 1998: 151-162).
The wild range of C. ferus, in all likelihood, extended only as far west as central Kazakhstan. This is significant for a number of reasons but first and foremost because this means that the natural distribution of the wild, two-humped progenitor of what we know as the domesticated Bactrian camel would not have included Bactria (northern Afghanistan/southern Uzbekistan) at all. How, then, to explain the name “Bactrian” given to the domesticated two-humped camel?
The term “Bactrian” was first applied to two-humped camels by Aristotle, who wrote of “the two species of camel, Bactrian and Arabian” (Historia Animalium 2.1 [498b9]) and noted that “The Bactrian camel differs from the Arabian in having two humps as against the latter’s one” (Historia Animalium 2.1 [499a15-17]). Some scholars have suggested that the name “Bactrian” became associated with the two-humped camel because camel-breeding developed in Bactria after initial domestication in eastern Iran and/or southern Turkmenistan (Schuegraf and Terbuyken 2001: 1225), but, as indicated above, this is not supported by the faunal evidence and it seems more likely that the Bactrian camel was introduced into Bactria proper from further east, not the south (eastern Iran/Seistan) or the west (Turkmenistan). Thus, like many commodities one can think of — Brussels sprouts or India ink — C. bactrianus would seem to be a misnomer. We have no idea where Aristotle got the designation “Bactrian” for the domesticated, two-humped camel, but he seems to have been responsible for introducing a term into the literature which should never have been applied to a mammal that was almost certainly domesticated outside of the region with which it is popularly associated.
Pure-bred Bactrians stand 1.5-2.4 m high to the top of the humps and are normally 1.68-1.63 m long, with a mean weight of 460 kgs (Epstein 1969: 118). They have been known to carry loads of 220-270 kgs some 30-40 kms daily, or 80-100 kms if pulling a loaded cart (Walz 1954: 56).4 Bactrian camels, which can live to be 35-40 years old, are generally put to work at the age of four and can expect to have 20-25 years of productive work (Epstein 1969: 120). They are at their best in the dry cold of the winter and spring months in Inner Asia, when their thick coats provided them with ample warmth. Able to withstand extremes of heat and cold, Bactrians prefer temperatures below 21° C but are capable of tolerating a 70°-broad range between winter lows and summer highs (Manefield and Tinson 2000: 38). Consistent heat, however, is intolerable for Bactrians and the caravans which once set out from China westwards across the Gobi desert always traveled in winter (Walz 1954: 55-56). Bactrians have been known to function at altitudes of up to 4000 m. above sea level, e.g. in the Pamirs (Gauthier-Pilters and Dagg 1981: 6). After a long journey they were typically rested for 1-2 weeks and were pastured for the summer months on the steppe, where they built up their fat reserves again in anticipation of further caravan crossings the following winter (Walz 1954: 56).
The precise chronology of the gradual westward spread of the Bactrian camel is difficult to determine, but the available evidence nonetheless suggests we are dealing with a “sloping chronology,” i.e. a progression from earlier finds in the east towards later finds in the west. The principal difficulty that arises in verifying this hypothesis is the relative paucity of well-studied and dated faunal assemblages from sites within the range of C. ferus. Camelid faunal remains are said to have been found (Olsen 1988: 21)5 at Neolithic sites near Baotou (Inner Mongolia) and Lake Barkhol (northeast Xinjiang), and although it is not certain that these are C. bactrianus as opposed to C. ferus, they were certainly two-humped. The likelihood that these were domestic Bactrians is considered strong given that the locales would have been difficult to reach without the use of the camel (Peters and von den Driesch 1997: 661). As Lehmann wrote in 1891 (p. 141; my translation): “Without the camel neither the icy steppes of Western Siberia nor the inner Asian plains were inhabitable; they would have remained until today an insurmountable obstacle to communication and would have made a nomadic existence impossible.”
By the middle of the fourth millennium BCE C. bactrianus was probably present in southern Turkmenistan. This being the case, and assuming a more or less continuous distribution of C. bactrianus from central Kazakhstan to the west, the animal was probably already present in Bactria by this time as well.6 Other sites on the southern (Iranian) side of the Kopet Dagh, however, do not show evidence of C. bactrianus at this early date.7 More Turkmenian evidence of C. bactrianus dates to the first half of the third millennium BCE. This includes terracotta models of wheeled carts drawn by Bactrian camels found at Altyn-depe in contexts dating to the Namazga IV period (Kohl 1992: 186) as well as faunal remains from Shor-depe, Chong-depe and Hapuz-depe (Compagnoni and Tosi 1978: Table 3).8 By the late third and early second millennium BCE the Bactrian camel is attested in the iconography of copper stamp seals and figurines thought to be from Bactria.9
Looking much further west, an unprovenanced cylinder seal in Old Syrian style in the Walters Art Gallery on which a Bactrian camel is depicted has been dated stylistically to c. 1750-1700 BCE (Gordon 1939: Pl. 7.55; Collon 2000: Fig. 8), but whether the fact that it bears a rider should be read as an indication that Bactrians were being ridden (e.g. Pohl 1950: 252) is unclear. Gordon noted that the awkwardness of the camel’s form on the Walters seal indicated that the seal-cutter was unfamiliar with Bactrian camels. We cannot say whether this seal reflects the presence of Bactrian camels in the Syro-Anatolian area in the early second millennium BCE, direct contacts between Syro-Anatolia and a region in which Bactrians were present (whether native or introduced), and/or indirect contacts between such regions via intermediaries like Elam or Assyria.
A possible indication of the northwestward spread of the Bactrian camel by or during the third millennium BCE may be provided by faunal remains in today’s Tatarstan and Ukraine,10 and there is evidence of the southward and eastward spread of C. bactrianus into Pakistani Baluchistan beginning in the early second millennium BCE.11 As we move ahead into the Iron Age, there is little persuasive evidence to demonstrate the presence of Bactrian camels in western Iran.12
This brings us, chronologically speaking, to the Achaemenid period when the Bactrian delegation, illustrated on the Apadana reliefs at Persepolis (Fig. 2), is shown bringing Bactrian camels to the imperial capital, and a Bactrian camel appears on one of the small gold plaques from the Oxus Treasure (Curtis and Searight 2003: Fig. 6.50). Thereafter, depictions of Bactrian camels become increasingly common, e.g. the Sarmatian gold plaques at Filippovka near the Ural River on the Eurasian steppes north of the Caspian (Aruz et al. 2000: Figs. 68, 96, 98) of fifth/fourth century BCE date. A particularly clear depiction from the late fifth century BCE occurs on a red-figured squat lekythos (E 695) in the British Museum (Curtius 1928: Abb. 6). Some scholars suggest that the Greeks first came into contact with Bactrian camels in Asia Minor, to which region they had been brought as a result of Achaemenid expansion (Schauenburg 1962: 99). Indeed Herodotus says that camels carried provisions for the advancing Persians, marvelling that Xerxes’ camel train was attacked by lions while marching between Acanthus and Therma, even though the lions “had never seen that beast before, nor had any experience of it” (7.125). We do not know whether these were dromedaries, like those used by Cyrus against Croesus of Lydia (Herodotus 1.80).13
According to Soviet research (cited in Peters and von den Driesch 1997: 662), Bactrian camels were present and probably eaten during the Hellenistic period in Choresmia, between the Aral Sea and the Amu Darya (Oxus) River. Finally, T’ang period (seventh/eighth century) tomb figures of Bactrian camels from China, some of which stand more than half a meter tall, are shown heavily laden with cargo (Vollmer, Keall and Nagai-Berthrong 1983: 47, 66) confirming their use as pack animals at this time.
In summary, the evidence just reviewed attests to an ever-expanding zone in which C. bactrianus is attested archaeologically outside the presumed native habitat of C. ferus. Although the data are not as plentiful as one would like, there is a general sense in which we move from the earliest evidence in the east (Neolithic Inner Mongolia) towards the west, with evidence beginning to appear in Turkmenistan (mid-fourth millennium BCE), Margiana and Bactria (mid-third millennium BCE) and surrounding areas to the north (Andronovo, Tripolye contexts) and south (Pirak, in Pakistani Baluchistan) as we move into the later second and early first millennium BCE. Above all, the available evidence flatly contradicts the idea that the two-humped camel was first domesticated in Bactria, and then spread eastward to China. In fact, it was precisely the opposite.
It is against the background of the archaeological evidence just reviewed that we turn now to some important epigraphic evidence attesting to the presence of C. bactrianus in Assyria from the end of the second through the middle of the first millennium BCE.
In a badly preserved fragment of the annals of Assur-bel-kala (1074-1057 BCE) on a tablet from Assur, the Assyrian king says that he sent merchants to acquire female Bactrian camels, udrate (Heimpel 1980: 331). On the Kurkh stele, Shalmaneser III (858-824 BCE) says that he brought back seven Bactrian camels as part of the booty from a campaign against Gilzanu (Mitchell 2000: 188, n. 7 with refs.), now thought to have been in the area south of Lake Urmia in northwestern Iran (Zadok 2002: 142-143). These are indeed illustrated twice, on the Black Obelisk, excavated by Layard at Nimrud, where they occur in Band 1 (Bulliet 1975: Fig. 70), and on the bronze gate decoration (Band 7) from Balawat, ancient Imgur-Enlil, several kilometers northeast of Nimrud (Bulliet 1975: Fig. 71). Interestingly, Bactrian camels are also shown in Band 3 on the Black Obelisk as tribute from Musri (Egypt).
Roughly a century later the Iranian stele of Tiglath-Pileser III (744-727 BCE), the exact provenance of which is unfortunately unknown, itemizes a long list of rulers from whom tribute was exacted, including several in the Zagros region of northwestern Iran. There we read, “And as for Iranzu of Mannaea, Dalta of Ellipi, the city rulers of Namri, of Singibutu (and) of all the eastern mountains - horses, mules, Bactrian camels, cattle (and) sheep I imposed upon them (as tribute) to be received annually in Assyria” (Tadmor 1994: 109). (15) In his first Babylonian campaign, the army of Sennacherib (704-681 BCE) seized both Bactrian and dromedary camels in Merodach-Baladan’s abandoned camp near Kish (Luckenbill 1924: 56, l. 7). Esarhaddon (680-669 BCE) campaigned against Patusharra to the east of Assyria, seizing Bactrian camels as booty.16
A debt-note from the reign of Esarhaddon, dating to 674 bc (Postgate 1976: 149, no. 38), shows us an Assyrian official named Dannaya putting two Bactrian camels at the disposal of three individuals. The text reads (Kwasman and Parpola 1991: no. 241):
Two double-humped camels belonging to Dannaya, at the disposal of Yahutu, Ilu-kenu-[usur], and Adad-aplu-[ddina]. They shall give the camels back on the first of [Marchesvan] (VIII). If they do not give them, they shall pay 6 minas of silver. Month Tishri (VII), 14th day, eponym year of Sarru-nuri. Witness Siqi-Issar. Witness Sulmu-sarri. Witness Adad-dan. [I]f they do not pay the silver, it will increase by 2 shekels per mina.
These sources raise a number of questions. First, what of the lands from which Bactrian camels were acquired? With the possible exception of Patusharra, which may have been located as far east as the Pamirs (thus Vallat 1993), all of the regions mentioned as sources of Bactrian camels were situated in western Iran, from modern day Iranian Azerbaijan southwards to western Luristan. Yet as our review of the available faunal and other archaeological evidence of C. bactrianus has shown, nothing suggests that these areas were even remotely close to the most westerly regions where Bactrian camels are known in iconography and the faunal record. Indeed, judging by the faunal inventory at sites on the Iranian Plateau, Turkmenistan seems to be the most westerly of those areas where Bactrian camel use could be said to have become common. On the contrary, the presence of C. dromedarius remains at Chalcolithic Tepe Ghabristan (period 4, c. 3700-3000 BCE) and early Iron Age Tepe Sagzabad (late second millennium BCE) shows that the dromedary was known on the Iranian Plateau from an early date. In view of this evidence, it could be suggested that the Bactrian camels demanded of Mannaea, Ellipi, Namri, Singibutu or Gilzanu would not have been native to those districts, but themselves imported from further east. Presumably, however, the Assyrians would not have demanded Bactrian camels of these regions if they had not seen them there. The question arises, therefore, why were west Iranian communities keeping Bactrian camels, and might this have something to do with their eventual use by the Assyrians? The answer, I suggest, lies in camel hybridization.
From the seventeenth century onward, a series of European travelers, anthropologists and veterinary scientists have amassed an important record of observations of the intentional cross-breeding of Bactrian and dromedary camels (Kolpakow 1935; Menges 1935; Tapper 1985). As with most hybridization, the aim in crossing camels has been to produce a “better” camel, in this case a more robust individual, stronger as a pack animal. In general, the best first generation hybrids are the products of male Bactrians crossed with female dromedaries, although female Bactrians crossed with male dromedaries are also attested. In cultures which practised camel hybridization, the stud function of Bactrian males was paramount, while small numbers of Bactrian females were kept in order to maintain a supply of pure Bactrian males. Tapper provides evidence on this practice over a region extending from Afghanistan to Anatolia. For example, amongst the Shahsevan of Azerbaijan, he observed, “Only the wealthiest of Shahsevan keep Bactrians, both male and female, and solely for breeding purposes. Female Bactrians are rarely if ever bought or sold, though they may change hands as gifts or be demanded as part of a bride-wealth.” (Tapper 1985: 59-60). In Central Asia, Kolpakow (1935: 619) found that 6-7 year old Bactrians were optimal for use as studs.
Although larger and stronger, hybrids look like dromedaries in that they have one hump, though this is normally not very symmetrical and often has a small indentation between 4 and 12 cm deep which divides the rear portion of the hump — often 2-3 times as large as the front — from the front part. Alternatively, the hump may end up looking quite flat, and has been compared to a flattened pyramid. Hybridization produces a large animal, which can stand 2.32 m high at the hump or 2.15 m high at the shoulder (Kolpakow 1935: 618, n. 5). The legs are long, the height of the camel often greater than its length, and the weight sometimes in the 900-950 kg range, though more often approaching an average of c. 650 kg (Kolpakow 1935: 620).
To sum up, Tapper (1985: 67) notes, “in my experience, the main advantage of the hybrid over the purer species, to both nomadic and commercial users, is less its supposed versatility than its vastly greater size, strength and carrying capacity, its aesthetically pleasing appearance, and its correspondingly greater value, in both financial and ceremonial terms.” In view of the evidence just reviewed, which extends from Anatolia and Syria in the west to Afghanistan in the east, we can safely say that small numbers of Bactrian camels have been kept, over the past 300-400 years, by groups which, in the main, raised dromedaries, for the purpose of producing hybrids of outstanding strength. Further, these hybrids were used specifically as caravan and draught animals. It can at least be suggested, therefore, that the reason why Assyrian kings seized Bactrian camels and demanded them as tribute from Iranian lands to the east of Assyria was to acquire studs and breeding females in order to practice the same sort of hybridization as just outlined, with a view to developing stronger pack animals for a variety of purposes (military, commercial, agricultural). While we have as yet no archaeological evidence of camel hybridization from the Assyrian period, we do have some from later periods in the Near East, which demonstrates that hybridization was practiced in antiquity.
In recent years, archaeo-zoologists have identified faunal evidence of camel hybrids at Mleiha in the United Arab Emirates, Troy in western Turkey, and Pella in Jordan. Chronologically, the earliest evidence dates to the Roman or Parthian period. In 1994, Dr. S.A. Jasim excavated an important cemetery near Mleiha, in the interior of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, which contained the graves of at least 12 camels, most of which, judging from associated finds, date to the first two centuries CE (Jasim 1999). The faunal remains, studied by H.-P. Uerpmann, included three hybrids. Identification of these individuals as hybrids was based on the morphometric analysis of selected bones (axis, astragalus, first phalanx) as compared with dromedary and Bactrian material. In addition to this material, Uerpmann (1999: 111-113) has identified the phalanx of a probable hybrid from a Roman context at Troy. Finally, I. Köhler-Rollefson (1989: 149) has identified possible hybrids amongst the faunal remains from early Islamic Pella, in Jordan. These are presumed to have been killed by an earthquake in 747.
Additional archaeological evidence includes camel figurines from Parthian contexts at Seleucia-on-the-Tigris which, as Bulliet (1975: Fig. 80) noted nearly 30 years ago, exhibit the small indentation in the hump characteristic of the hybrid.
Conclusion
The ethnographic and historic observations reviewed above leave one in no doubt about the benefits and geographically widespread evidence of hybridization, while the archaeological evidence from Mleiha and Troy confirms the existence of hybrids by the Roman or Parthian period. But this evidence alone does not sustain Bulliet’s (1990: 731; cf. 1975: 168; Peters and von den Driesch 1997: 654) assertion that Diodorus “contains the first recorded reference to cross breeding of the dromedary and the Bactrian camel.” I would suggest that the Neo-Assyrian sources cited above — the inclusion of Bactrian camels in the list of livestock demanded as tribute by Tiglath-Pileser III and Esarhaddon, the receipt of Bactrian camels from Musri and Gilzanu as shown on the Balawat gates and the Black Obelisk, the loan of Bactrian camels by Dannaya, Sennacherib’s capture of Bactrian camels in Merodach-Baladan’s camp, and Assur-bel-kala’s damaged reference to udrate — all point to the presence of Bactrian camels in Babylonia and Assyria some 500-1000 years before Diodorus observed them. Furthermore, given what we know of the distribution of C. ferus and C. bactrianus, and of the presence of C. dromedarius on the Iranian Plateau at an early date, I would suggest that the Iranian groups, mainly Median, from whom the Assyrians sought Bactrian camels were already engaged in camel hybridization by the time the Assyrians became conscious of the practice. Whether the Syrian cylinder seal from the eighteenth century BCE allows us to push that date even further back in time is difficult to answer, but in view of the ever-increasing body of evidence for ties between Central Asia and Elam (Amiet 1986: 146-207), and between Elam and Assyria and Mari in the early second millennium BCE (Potts 1999: 166ff), it is entirely possible that this was the period in which the peoples of the Near East first became aware of C. bactrianus. Whatever the case may be, it is now clear that the Bactrian camel has little beyond its name in common with the region of Bactria, and that its origins lie much further east, on the high steppes of Inner Asia. That it came to play an important role further west, already by the Assyrian period if not earlier, seems clear. The raison d’être behind the Assyrian interest in the Bactrian camel, and behind its later occurrence as far west as Anatolia, lies in the breeding of Bactrian-dromedary hybrids, the strength of which was un-surpassed by any other domestic animal, apart from the elephant, in the ancient Near East.
About the Author
Daniel Potts was educated at Harvard (AB ’75, PhD ’80) and has taught at the Freie Universität Berlin (1981-1986), the Univ. of Copenhagen (1980-1981, 1986-1991) and the Univ. of Sydney (1991-present). He is a specialist in the archaeology of Iran, Mesopotamia and the Persian Gulf, and has published widely on these areas. He is the founding editor of Arabian Archaeology & Epigraphy, and is a Fellow of the Australian Academy of the Humanities. He may be contacted at: dan.potts@arts.usyd.edu.au.
References
- Amiet 1986P. Amiet. L’âge des échanges inter-iraniens, 3500-1700 avant J.-C. Paris, 1986. Notes et documents des Musées de France 11.
- Amschler 1939J. W. Amschler. Tierreste der Ausgrabungen von der “grossen Königshügel” Shah Tepé, in Nord-Iran. Stockholm, 1939. Reports from the Scientific Expedition to the North-West Provinces of China under the Leadership of Dr. Sven Hedin —The Sino-Swedish Expedition — Publication 9.
- Aruz et al. 2000J. Aruz, A. Farkas, A. Alekseev, and E. Korolkova, eds. The Golden Deer of Eurasia. New York and New Haven: Metropolitan Mus-eum of Art and Yale University Press, 2000.
- Badam 1984G. L. Badam. “Holocene faunal material from India with special reference to domesticated animals.” In: Animals and archaeology: 3. Early herders and their flocks. J. Clutton-Brock and C. Grigson, eds. British Achae-ological Reports Int. Ser. 202. Oxford, 1984, pp. 339-353.
- Bannikov 1976A. G. Bannikov. “Wild camels of the Gobi.” Wildlife, 18 (1976): 398-403.
- Baur et al. 1933P. V. C. Baur, M. I. Rostovtzeff, and A. R. Bellinger, The Excavations at Dura-Europus...Preliminary Report of Fourth Season of Work, October 1930 - March 1931. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1933.
- Boardman and Vollenweider 1978J. Boardman and M.-L. Vollen-weider. Catalogue of the engraved gems and finger rings (Ashmolean Museum, Oxford) I. Greek and Etruscan. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.
- Brentjes 1960B. Brentjes, B. “Das Kamel im Alten Orient.” Klio, 38 (1960): 23-52.
- Bulliet 1975R. W. Bulliet. The Camel and the Wheel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.
- Bulliet 1980R. W. Bulliet. “Camel ii. In Persian history and economy.” Encyclopaedia Iranica, 4 (1980): 730-733.
- Collon 2000D. Collon. “L’animal dans les échanges et les relations diplomatiques.” In: Les animaux et les hommes dans le monde syro-mésopotamien aux époques historiques. Lyon: Topoi Supplement 2 (2000): 125-140.
- Compagnoni and Tosi 1978B. Compagnoni and M. Tosi. “The camel: Its distribution and state of domestication in the Middle East during the third millennium B.C. in light of finds from Shahr-i Sokhta.” In: Meadow, R.H. and Zeder, M.A., eds. Approaches to faunal analysis in the Middle East. Peabody Museum Bulletin 2. Cambridge, 1978, pp. 91-103.
- Curtius 1928L. Curtius. “Sardanapal.” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, 43 (1928): 281-297.
- Curtis and Searight 2003J. Curtis and A. Searight. “The gold plaques of the Oxus Treasure.” In: Culture through objects: Ancient Near Eastern studies in honour of P.R.S. Moorey. T. Potts, M. Roaf and D. Stein, eds. Oxford: Griffith Institute, 2003, pp. 219-240.
- Douglas van Buren 1939E. Douglas van Buren. The fauna of ancient Mesopotamia. Rome, 1939. Analecta Orientalia 18.
- Duerst 1908J. U. Duerst. “Animal remains from the excavation at Anau and the horse of Anau in its relation to the history and to the races of domesticated horses.” In: R. Pumpelly, ed. Explorations in Turkestan, Expedition of 1904. Washington: Carnegie Institution, 1908, pp. 341-442.
- During Caspers 1972E. C. L. During Caspers. “La hachette trouée de la sépulture E de Khurab, dans le Balouchistan persan, examen retrospectif.” Iranica Antiqua, 9 (1972): 60-64.
- Epstein 1969H. Epstein. Domestic animals of China. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, 1969.
- Gauthier-Pilters and Dagg 1981H. Gauthier-Pilters and A. I. Dagg, The Camel: Its Evolution, Ecology, Behavior, and Relationship to Man. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1981
- Geiger 1979W. Geiger. Ostiranische Kultur im Altertum. Aalen: Scientia, 1979 (repr. 1882 ed.).
- Ghirshman 1938R. Ghirshman. Fouilles de Sialk, près de Kashan, 1933, 1934, 1937. Paris: Geuthner, 1938.
- Gordon 1939C. H. Gordon. Western Asiatic seals in the Walters Art Gallery. Iraq, 6 (1939): 3-34.
- Gray 1972A. P. Gray. Mammalian hybrids, 2nd ed. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, 1972.
- Hancar 1956F. Hancar. Das Pferd in prähistorischer und früher historischer Zeit. Vienna, 1956. Wiener Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte und Linguistik 11.
- Hartmann 1869R. Hartmann. “Studien zur Geschichte der Hausthiere I. Das Kameel.” Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 1 (1869): 66-79.
- Heimpel 1980W. Heimpel. “Kamel.” Reallexikon der Assyriologie 5 (1980): 330-332.
- Heptner et al. 1966V. G. Heptner, A. A. Nasimovic, and A. G. Bannikov. Die Säugetiere der Sowjetunion 1. Paarhufer und Unpaarhufer. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1966.
- van Ingen 1939W. van Ingen. Figurines from Seleucia on the Tigris. Ann Arbor and London: Univ. of Michigan and Oxford Univ. Press, 1939.
- Jettmar 1967K. Jettmar. Art of the Steppes. New York: Crown Publishers, 1967.
- Kohl 1984P. L. Kohl. Central Asia: Palaeolithic Beginnings to the Iron Age. Paris: Éditions Recherche sur les Civilisations, 1984.
- Kohl 1992P. L. Kohl. “Central Asia (Western Turkestan): Neolithic to the Early Iron Age.” In: R. W. Ehrich, ed. Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, 3rd ed. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 179-195.
- Köhler-Rollefson 1989I. Köhler-Rollefson. “Zoological analysis of camel skeletons.” In: Pella of the Decapolis, Vol. 2. Wooster: College of Wooster, 1989, pp. 142-164.
- Kolpakow 1935V. N. Kolpakow. “Über Kamelkreuzungen.” Berliner Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 51 (1935): 617-622.
- Kuhrt 1999A. Kuhrt. “The exploitation of the camel in the Neo-Assyrian empire.” In: Studies in ancient Egypt in honour of H.S. Smith. A. Leahy and J. Tait, eds. London: Occasional Publications of the Egypt Exploration Society, 1999, pp. 179-184.
- Kwasman and Parpola 1991T. Kwasman and S. Parpola. Legal transactions of the royal court of Nineveh, Part 1. Tiglath-Pileser III through Esarhaddon. Helsinki, 1991. State Archives of Assyria 6.
- Lamberg-Karlovsky 1969C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky. “Further notes on the shaft-hole pick-axe from Khurab, Makran.” Iran, 7 (1969): 163-168.
- Lattimore 1929O. Lattimore. The Desert Road to Turkestan. Boston: Little, Brown, 1929.
- Lehmann 1891O. Lehmann. “Das Kamel, seine geographische Verbreitung und die Bedingungen seines Vorkommens.” Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Geographie 8 (1891): 93-141.
- Luckenbill 1924D. D. Luckenbill. The Annals of Sennacherib. Chicago, 1924. Oriental Institute Publication 2.
- Manefield and Tinson 2000G. W. Manefield and A. H. Tinson. Camels: A compendium. Sydney, 2000. T.G. Hungerford Vade Mecum Series for Domestic Animals Series C 22.
- Mashkour 2002M. Mashkour. “Chasse et élevage au nord du Plateau central iranien entre le Néolithique et l’Âge du Fer.” Paléorient, 28 (2002): 27-42.
- Mashkour et al. 1999M. Mashkour, M. Fontugne, and C. Hatte. “Investigations on the evolution of subsistence economy in the Qazvin Plain (Iran) from the Neolithic to the Iron Age.” Antiquity, 73 (1999): 65-76.
- Mashkour and Yaghmayi 1996M. Mashkour and E. Yaghmayi. “Faunal remains from Tappeh Hessar (Iran), results of the 1995 excavation.” In: Atti del XIII Congresso, Vol. 1. Forli: Unione Internazionale delle scienze preistoriche e protostoriche, 1996, pp. 543-551.
- Meadow 1993R. H. Meadow. “Continuity and change in the agriculture of the Greater Indus Valley.” International Association for the Study of the Cultures of Central Asia Information Bulletin, 19 (1993): 63-77.
- Menges 1935K. Menges. “Die Wörter für ‘Kamel’ und einige seiner Kreuzungsformen im Türkischen.” Ungarische Jahrbücher, 15 (1935): 517-528.
- Mitchell 2000T. C. Mitchell. “Camels in the Assyrian bas-reliefs.” Iraq, 62 (2000): 187-194.
- Nikylina 1994N. M. Nikylina. Iskusstvo Ionii i Achemenidskogo Irana. [Art of Ionia and Achaemenid Iran.] Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1994.
- Nowak 1999R. M. Nowak. Walker’s mammals of the world, 6th ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1999.
- Olsen 1988S. J. Olsen. “The camel in ancient China and an osteology of the camel.” Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 140 (1988): 18-58.
- Peters and von den Driesch 1997J. Peters and A. von den Driesch. “The two-humped camel (Camelus bactrianus): New light on its distribution, management and medical treatment in the past.” Journal of Zoology, 242 (1997): 651-679.
- Pohl 1950A. Pohl. “Das Kamel in Meso-potamien.” Orientalia, 19 (1950): 252.
- Postgate 1976J. N. Postgate. Fifty Neo-Assyrian legal documents. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1976.
- Potts 1999D. T. Potts. The archaeology of Elam: Formation and transformation of an ancient Iranian state. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999.
- Roux 1959-60J.-P. Roux. “Le chameau en Asie centrale.” Central Asiatic Journal, 5 (1959-1960): 35-76.
- Santoni 1979M. Santoni. “Les objets.” In: J.-F. Jarrige and M. Santoni. Fouilles de Pirak, vol. 1. Paris: Boccard, 1979, pp. 167-232.
- Sarianidi 1998aV. Sarianidi. Myths of ancient Bactria and Margiana on its (sic) seals and amulets. Moscow: Pentagraphic, 1988.
- Sarianidi 1998bV. Sarianidi. Margiana and Protozoroastrism. Athens: Kapon Editions, 1988.
- Schaller 1998G. B. Schaller. Wildlife of the Tibetan Steppe. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
- Schauenberg 1962K. Schauenberg. “Neue antike Cameliden.” Bonner Jahrbücher, 162 (1962): 98-106.
- Schuegraf and Terbuyken 2001O. Schuegraf and P. Terbuyken. “Kamel.” Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, 19 (2001): 1224-1241.
- Shafer 1950E. H. Shafer. “The camel in China down to the Mongol dynasty.” Sinologica, 2 (1950): 165-194, 263-290.
- Tadmor 1995H. Tadmor. The inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III, king of Assyria. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1994.
- Tapper 1985R. Tapper. “One hump or two? Hybrid camels and pastoral cultures.” Production pastorale et société, 16 (1985): 55-69.
- Uerpmann 1999H.-P. Uerpmann. “Camel and horse skeletons from proto-historic graves at Mleiha in the Emirate of Sharjah (U.A.E.).” Arabian Archaeology & Epigraphy 10 (1999): 102-118.
- Vallat 1993F. Vallat. Les noms géographiques des sources suso-élamites. Wiesbaden, 1993. TAVO Beiheft B 7/11 [= Répertoire Géographique des Textes Cunéiformes 11].
- Voigt and Dyson 1992M. M. Voigt and R. H. Dyson, Jr. “The chronology of Iran, ca. 8000-2000 B.C.” In: R. W. Ehrich, ed. Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, 3rd ed. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 122-178.
- Vollmer et al. 1983J. E. Vollmer, E. J. Keall, and E. Nagai-Berthrong. Silk Roads, China Ships. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum, 1983.
- Walz 1954R. Walz. “Neue Untersuchungen zum Domestikationsproblem der altweltlichen Cameliden.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 104 (1954): 45-87.
- Wapnish 1984P. Wapnish. “The dromedary and Bactrian camel in Levantine historical settings: The evidence from Tell Jemmeh.” In: Animals and archaeology: 3. Early herders and their flocks. J. Clutton-Brock and C. Grigson, eds. British Arch. Reports Int. Ser. 202. Oxford, 1984, pp. 171-200.
- Winkelmann 1999S. Winkelmann. “Von Formen und Stilen — ein Versuch der Gliederung baktrischer Stempel- und Rollsiegel.” Hallesche Beiträge zur Orientwissenschaft, 28 (1999): 112-209.
- Zadok 2002R. Zadok. The ethno-linguistic character of northwestern Iran and Kurdistan in the Neo-Assyrian period. Jaffa: Archaeological Center Publications, 2002.
- Zeuner 1955F. E. Zeuner. “The identity of the camel on the Khurab pick.” Iraq, 17 (1955): 162-163.
Notes
According to Āryabhaṭa, hallowed Kaliyuga tradition is the calendar of Bhāratiya-s
Definition of Kaliyuga by Āryabhaṭīya is emphatic, records the beginning of Kaliyuga at 3102 BCE. 10. When three yugapādas and sixty times sixty years had elapsed (from the beginning of the yuga) then twenty-three years of my life had passed.
https://archive.org/stream/The_Aryabhatiya_of_Aryabhata_Clark_1930#page/n3/mode/2upDate of Āryabhaṭīya 499 CE and sheet-anchor of Bhāratīya Itihāsa कलियुग, calendar from 17/18 February 3102 BCE -- KV Sarma (IJHS 36(4), 2001)
K. V. Sarma (2001). "Āryabhaṭa: His name, time and provenance"(PDF). Indian Journal of History of Science. 36 (4): 105–115.
Narahari Achar
Alternate name
Āryabhaṭa the Elder
Born (India), 476
Āryabhaṭa I is the foremost astronomer of the classical age of India. He was born in 476 in Aśmaka, but later lived in Kusumapura, identified as the modern city of Patna. Nothing much is known about his personal life, except that he was a great and revered teacher. He is referred to as Kulapa (or Kulapati, vice chancellor), quite possibly of the Nalanda School. His work Āryabhaṭīya is the earliest preserved astronomical text of the scientific period of ancient Indian astronomy that bears the name of an individual.
Āryabhaṭa wrote at least two works on astronomy: (1) Āryabhaṭīya, a very well known work and (2) Āryabhaṭa‐siddhānta, a work known only through references to it in later works. Āryabhaṭīya deals with both mathematics and astronomy and is noted for its brevity and conciseness of composition. It contains 121 stanzas in all and is divided into four chapters, each called a pāda. There exist a number of commentaries written in Sanskrit and other regional languages of India, and there also exist a large number of independent astronomical works based on it. Several English translations of Āryabhaṭīya have been published, including a critical edition of the text in Sanskrit accompanied by an English translation. Several critically edited commentaries on Āryabhaṭīya by earlier Indian astronomers, together with English translations, have also been published. Āryabhaṭīya was translated into Arabic around 800 as the Zīj al‐Arjabhar.
The notable features of Āryabhaṭa's contributions are his acceptance of the possibility of the Earth's rotation, a set of excellent planetary parameters that may be based on his own observations, and a theory of epicycles. It may be noted that his theory of epicycles differs from that of Ptolemy. Ptolemy's epicycles remain the same in size from place to place whereas Āryabhaṭa's epicycles vary in size from place to place. Āryabhaṭa's contributions in mathematics include an alphabetical system of numerical notation, and giving the approximate value of Pi (π) as 3.1416. He also provided a table of sine differences, and formulae for sines of angles greater than 90°. He gave solutions to some indeterminate equations.
The other work, Āryabhaṭa‐siddhānta, is known only through the references to it by other astronomers such as Varāhamihira and Brahmagupta. The astronomical methods and parameters in Āryabhaṭa‐siddhānta differed somewhat from those in the Āryabhaṭīya, notably the reckoning of the day from midnight to midnight. Unfortunately, after Brahmagupta wrote the Khaṇḍakhādyaka based on the Āryabhaṭa‐siddhānta, the original work was lost. Brahmagupta was a severe critic of Āryabhaṭa.
Selected References
Āryabhaṭa (1930). Āryabhaṭīya, translated into English with notes by W. E. Clark. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
——— (1976). Āryabhaṭīya edited and translated into English by Kripa Shankar Shukla in collaboration with K. V. Sarma. Āryabhaṭīya critical edition series, pt. 1. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy. (Also contains notes and comments by Shukla.)
——— (1976). Āryabhaṭīya. With the commentary of Bhāskara and Someśvara, edited by Kripa Shankar Shukla. Āryabhaṭīya critical edition series, pt. 2. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy. (Also contains an introduction by Shukla.)
——— (1976). Āryabhaṭīya. With the commentary of Sūryadeva Yajvan, edited by K. V. Sarma. Āryabhaṭīya critical edition series, pt. 3. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy. (Also contains an introduction by Sarma.)
Bose, D. M., S. N. Sen, and B. V. Subbarayappa (1971). A Concise History of Science in India. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy.
Dikshit, S. B. (1896). Bhāratīya Jyotisha. Poona. (English translation by R. V. Vaidya. 2 pts. New Delhi: Government of India Press, Controller of Publications, 1969, 1981.)
Pingree, David. Census of the Exact Sciences in Sanskrit. Series A. Vol. 1 (1970): 50b–53b; Vol. 2 (1971): 15b; Vol. 3 (1976): 16a; Vol. 4 (1981): 27b; Vol. 5 (1994): 16a–17a. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society. (Contains a full bibliography.)
https://islamsci.mcgill.ca/RASI/BEA/Aryabhata_I_BEA.htm
Information kiosk at Bhalka, the place from where Krishna returned to his heavenly abode
Indus Script hieroglyph is pã̄ḍā, pã̄ḍyā 'tiger cub'; rebus पांड्या pāṇḍyā customs scribe, accountant in फड paṭṭaḍa 'metals manufactory, company, guild'
Hieroglyphs on Gardez Mahāvināyaka pratimā:
1. pāṇḍva n. an uncoloured woollen garment, ŚBr.
2. Tiger cub: M. pã̄ḍā, ˚ḍyā m. ʻ half -- grown tiger -- cub ʼ.(CDIAL 7717)
3. phaṭā फटा (Samskrtam), phaḍā फडा (Marathi), paṭam (Tamil. Malayalam), paḍaga (Telugu) The hood of Coluber Nága Rebus; फड paṭṭaḍa 'metals manufactory, company, guild'.
4. panja 'feline paw' rebus: panja 'kiln, furnace'
5. ibha 'elephant' rebus: ib 'iron'; karibha 'elephant' rebus: karba 'iron'
Rebus rendering of the first three hieroglyphs:
I submit the anthropomorphic hieroglyph signifiers on Gardez Mahāvināyaka pratimā signify rendered rebus in Meluhha that Mahāvināyaka is 1. a customs officer, scribe, accountant, 2. working with ib, karba 'iron' panja 'kiln, furnace'; and 3. working in फडा 'metals manufactory, factory, guild'.
Hence, Mahāvināyaka is signified by the woollen garment pāṇḍva illustrated with a tiger cub pã̄ḍā, pã̄ḍyā with the rebus reading of
Hence, he is seen dancing with the gaṇa of kharva 'dwarfs' on sculptural friezes:
The presence of varaha as a dancer is also explained in Meluhha rebus rendering:
देशपांड्या dēśapāṇḍyā m An hereditary officer of a Mahál. He is under the Deshmukh. His office nearly corresponds with that of
baḍhia = a castrated boar, a hog; rebus: baḍhi 'a caste who work both in iron and wood' వడ్రంగి , వడ్లంగి, వడ్లవాడు (p. 1126) vaḍraṅgi, vaḍlaṅgi, vaḍlavāḍu or వడ్లబత్తుడు vaḍrangi. [Tel.] n. A carpenter. వడ్రంగము, వడ్లపని, వడ్రము or వడ్లంగితనము vaḍrangamu. n. The trade of a carpenter. వడ్లవానివృత్తి. వడ్రంగిపని. వడ్రంగిపిట్ట or వడ్లంగిపిట్ట vaḍrangi-piṭṭa. n. A woodpecker. దార్వాఘాటము. వడ్లకంకణము vaḍla-kankaṇamu. n. A curlew. ఉల్లంకులలో భేదము. వడ్లత or వడ్లది vaḍlata. n. A woman of the carpenter caste. vardhaki m. ʻ carpenter ʼ MBh. [√vardh ] Pa. vaḍḍhaki -- m. ʻ carpenter, building mason ʼ; Pk. vaḍḍhaï -- m. ʻ carpenter ʼ, °aïa -- m. ʻ shoemaker ʼ; WPah. jaun. bāḍhōī ʻ carpenter ʼ, (Joshi) bāḍhi m., N. baṛhaï, baṛahi, A. bārai, B. bāṛaï, °ṛui, Or. baṛhaï, °ṛhāi, (Gaṛjād) bāṛhoi, Bi. baṛa hī, Bhoj. H. baṛhaī m., M. vāḍhāyā m., Si. vaḍu -- vā.(CDIAL 11375)
S. vāḍho m. ʻ carpenter ʼ, P. vāḍḍhī, bā˚ m. (< *vārdhika -- ?); Si. vaḍu ʻ pertaining to carpentry ʼ.
vārdhanī -- see
Addenda: *vārdhaka -- [Dial. a ~ ā < IE. o T. Burrow BSOAS xxxviii 73]
Pa. cīvara -- vaḍḍhaka -- m. ʻ tailor ʼ; Kho. bardo
Pa. vaḍḍhaki -- m. ʻ carpenter, building mason ʼ; Pk. vaḍḍhaï -- m. ʻ carpenter ʼ, ˚aïa -- m. ʻ shoemaker ʼ; WPah. jaun. bāḍhōī ʻ carpenter ʼ, (Joshi) bāḍhi m., N. baṛhaï, baṛahi, A. bārai, B. bāṛaï, ˚ṛui, Or. baṛhaï, ˚ṛhāi, (Gaṛjād) bāṛhoi, Bi. baṛ
*
Addenda: vardhaki -- : WPah.kṭg. báḍḍh
†*
Md. vaḍām ʻ carpentry ʼ.
S. vaḍhiṇī f. ʻ cutting ʼ, Si. väḍun.
Association of kharva with smelting of mineral ores and metalwork is signified on two Mathura frescoes:
Worship of Śivalinga by Gandharvas - Śunga Period - Bhuteśwar - ACCN 3625 - Government Museum - Mathura 2013-02-24 6098.JPG

Civilizational epigraphy. Indus Script abiding continuum on coins from Ancient India mints documenting wealth-accounting ledgers

Material: Terra Cotta
Dimensions: 3.91 Length, 1.5 to 1.62 cm Width
Harappa, Lot 4651-01
Harappa Museum, H95-2486
Meadow and Kenoyer 1997 https://www.harappa.com/content/diety-strangling-tigers-tablet
karibha, ibha 'elephant' rebus: karba, ib 'iron' tsarkh 'potter's wheel' (Pashto) rebus: arka 'sun's rays, coper, gold' arkasal 'goldsmith workshop'

Six hair-knots: baṭa 'six' rebus: baṭa 'iron' bhaṭa 'furnace' kāṇa 'one-eye' rebus: kāṇa 'riches, wealth'. mūh, mukha 'face' rebus: mūhā mẽṛhẽt 'iron smelted by the Kolhes and formed into an equilateral lump a little pointed at each of four ends.' Thus, riches from iron furnace ingots. The lady thwarts, stops two rearing tigers. kola 'tiger' rebus: kol 'working in iron' kolhe 'smelter' dula 'pair' rebus: dul 'metal casting' panja 'feline paws' rebus: panja 'kiln, furnace'; स्कम्भ् 'impede' rebus: kammaṭa'mint, coiner coinage'. Thus, the narrative occurs in an iron smelter of a mint. The ladder hieroglyph in the text message is śrēṣṭrī 'ladder' Rebus: seṭh ʻ head of a guild, Members of the guild.'. The standard device is सांगड sāṅgaḍa'A body formed of two or more (fruits, animals, men) linked or joined together'; Rebus: सांगड sāṅgaḍa'(संघट्ट S) A float composed of two canoes or boats bound together'(Marathi) Other hieroglyphs of the text message: sal 'splinter' rebus: sal 'workshop' aya 'fish' rebus: aya 'iron' ayas 'alloy metal' (RV) Or. kāṇḍa, kã̄ṛ ʻstalk, arrow ʼ(CDIAL 3023) Rebus: khaṇḍa 'equipment'.

Pa. kaṇa -- m. ʻ dust between husk and grain of rice ʼ, kaṇikā -- f. ʻ particle of broken rice ʼ; Pk. kaṇa -- , ˚aga -- m. ʻ scattered grain, rice, wheat, particle, drop ʼ, kaṇiyā -- f. ʻ fragment of rice or wheat ʼ; A. kanā ʻ a minute particle ʼ, kani ʻ egg, testicle, *drop ʼ (whence kaniyāiba ʻ to fall in small drops ʼ); B. kan ʻ eye of corn, particle ʼ, kanā ʻ piece of dust, cummin seed ʼ, kanī ʻ atom, particle ʼ; Or. kaṇa, ˚ṇā ʻ particle of dust, eye of seed, atom ʼ, kaṇi ʻ particle of grain ʼ; OAw. kana ʻ drop (of dew) ʼ;Sh. (Lor.) k
2. Pk. vaṭṭa -- , vatta -- , vitta -- , vutta -- ʻ passed, gone away, completed, dead ʼ; Ash. weṭ -- intr. ʻ to pass (of time), pass, fall (of an avalanche) ʼ, weṭā -- tr. ʻ to pass (time) ʼ; Paš. wiṭīk ʻ passed ʼ; K.ḍoḍ. buto ʻ he was ʼ; P. batāuṇā ʻ to pass (time) ʼ; Ku. bītṇo ʻ to be spent, die ʼ, bitauṇo ʻ to pass, spend ʼ; N. bitāunu ʻ to pass (time), kill ʼ, butāunu ʻ to extinguish ʼ; Or. bitibā intr. ʻ to pass (of time), bitāibā tr.; Mth. butāb ʻ to extinguish ʼ; OAw. pret. bītā ʻ passed (of time) ʼ; H. bītnā intr. ʻ to pass (of time) ʼ, butnā ʻ to be extinguished ʼ, butānā ʻ to extinguish ʼ; G. vĭ̄tvũ intr. ʻ to pass (of time) ʼ, vatāvvũ tr. ʻ to stop ʼ.
3. Pa. vatta -- n. ʻ duty, office ʼ; Pk. vaṭṭa -- , vatta -- , vitta -- , vutta -- n. ʻ livelihood ʼ; P. buttā m. ʻ means ʼ; Ku. buto ʻ daily labour, wages ʼ; N. butā ʻ means, ability ʼ; H. oūtā m. ʻ power ʼ; Si. vaṭa ʻ subsistence, wages ʼ.

Abiding Indus Script hypertext dotted circle is dhāv, dāya 'one in dice' + vaṭṭa 'circle' rebus धावड dhāvaḍa 'red ferrite ore smelter'. Tablets.Ivory objects. Mohenjo-daro.
Hieroglyph: Aquatic bird
Ivory rod, ivory plaques with dotted circles. Mohenjo-daro (Musee National De Arts Asiatiques, Guimet, 1988-1989, , Les cites oubliees de l’Indus Archeologie du Pakistan.] dhātu ' layer, strand'; dhāv 'strand, string' Rebus: dhāu, dhātu 'ore'. dATu 'cross' rebus: dhatu 'mineral'. Thus, the message signified by dotted circles and X hieroglyph refers to dhā̆vaḍ priest of 'iron-smelters'. The aquatic duck shown atop an ivory rod is: karaṇḍa 'duck' (Sanskrit) karaṛa 'a very large aquatic bird' (Sindhi) Rebus: करडा [karaḍā] Hard from alloy--iron, silver &c. (Marathi) Thus, the metalworker (smelter) works with hard alloys (using carburization process). Three dotted circles: kolom 'three' rebus: kolimi 'smithy, forge'. Thus working with minerals and hard alloys for smithy, forge.


Stone-smithy guild on a Meluhha standard
It is possible that an alternative gloss from Rigveda may match the hieroglyph, in context. Context is that the entire Indus Script Corpora has been shown to be a set of metalwork catalogues and the samskrti relates the Skambha as a signifier of Soma yaga (as evidenced by the octagonal skambha, yupa, of Binjor yajna kunda).
The word is: स्कम्भ् as in Atharva Veda Skambha Sukta which has two meanings: 1. to impede, check; 2. pillar (like a fiery pillar of light, say, Shivalinga, ekamukhalinga as shown on Bhuteshwar sculptural friezes). The word skambh is also seen as a phonetic determinant of the metalwork catalogue message conveyed: kampaTTa 'mint'.
Rebus: Ta. kampaṭṭam coinage, coin. Ma. kammaṭṭam, kammiṭṭam coinage, mint. Ka. kammaṭa id.; kammaṭi a coiner. (DEDR 1236)
खांबोटी (p. 205) [ khāmbōṭī ] f (Dim. of
*skabha ʻ post, peg ʼ. [√
2. K. khamb
Bhojpuri has the etymon kān, 'one-eyed'.;Khotanese Kho. kām ʻblindness.ʼany Dravidian etyma signify kan 'eye' (singular). It is suggested that the word for ONE EYE on Indus Script hieroglyphs is: kan 'eye' (singular). Such a hieroglyph circumscripted by a circle signifies vaṭṭa 'round, circle' (Pali.Pkt.). The rebus readings are: kan 'copper' PLUS vaṭṭa 'business'; the combined expression is: kaṇ-vaṭṭam 'circle round one eye' rebus: kaṇ-vaṭṭam, kampaṭṭam, kammaṭṭam, kammaṭa 'mint, coiner, coinage'. The Gujarati word khambat may also be related to the semantics of these etyma which explain a mint (copperwork or copper business). Other hieroglyphs are: wing, post, pillar which also signify rebus : kammaṭa 'mint' Hieroglyphs (wing, pillar): khambhaṛā 'fish-fin' S. khambhu, ˚bho m. ʻ plumage ʼ, khambhuṛi f. ʻ wing ʼ;(CDIAL 13640) Pk. khaṁbha -- m. ʻ post, pillar ʼ; Pr. iškyöp, üšköb ʻ bridge ʼ NTS xv 251; L. (Ju.) khabbā m., mult. khambbā m. ʻ stake forming fulcrum for oar ʼ; P. khambh, khambhā, khammhā m. ʻ wooden prop, post ʼ;(CDIAL 13639)
The note has recorded evidence that கண்வட்டம் kaṇ-vaṭṭam 'mint' has a synonym (demonstrably, a phonetic variant in mleccha/meluhha): khambhaṛā 'fin' (Lahnda) rebus: kammaTa 'mint' and these two expressions are combined in the Begram ivory (Plate 389)

Dimensions: 3.91 Length, 1.5 to 1.62 cm Width
Harappa, Lot 4651-01
Harappa Museum, H95-2486 Meadow and Kenoyer 1997 Other hieroglyphs on the tablet (apart from the one-eyed person thwarting jumping tigers): karibha, ibha'elephant' rebus: karba, ib 'iron' tsarkh, arka 'potter's wheel' rebus: arka 'copper, gold'. Thus, the tablet inscription signifies a gold, copper mint working with brazier and detailing metalwork catalogue in Indus Script messages (heiroglyphs and hypertexts)..
Kol. kan (pl. kanḍl) eye, small hole in ground, cave. Nk. kan (pl. kanḍḷ) eye, spot in peacock's tail. Go. (Tr.) kan (pl. kank) id.; (A.) kaṛ (pl. kaṛk) id. Manḍ. kan (pl. -ke) id. Kui kanu (pl. kan-ga), (K.) kanu (pl. kaṛka) id. Nk. (Ch.) kan (pl. -l) eye. Pa. (S. only) kan (pl. kanul) eye. Kur. xann eye, eye of tuber; xannērnā (of newly born babies or animals) to begin to see, have the use of one's eyesight (for ērnā, see 903). Malt. qanu eye. Br. xan eye, bud.Ta. kaṇ eye, aperture, orifice, star of a peacock's tail. Ma. kaṇ, kaṇṇu eye, nipple, star in peacock's tail, bud. Ko. kaṇ eye. To. koṇ eye, loop in string. Ka. kaṇ eye, small hole, orifice. Koḍ. kaṇṇï id. Tu. kaṇṇů eye, nipple, star in peacock's feather, rent, tear. Te. kanu, kannu eye, small hole, orifice, mesh of net, eye in peacock's feather. Ga. (Oll.) kaṇ (pl. kaṇkul) id.; kaṇul maṭṭa eyebrow; kaṇa (pl. kaṇul) hole; (S.) kanu (pl. kankul) eye. Konḍa kaṇ id. Pe. kaṇga (pl. -ŋ, kaṇku) id. Kui kanu (pl. kan-ga), (K.) kanu (pl. kaṛka) id. Kuwi (F.) kannū (pl. karňka), (S.) kannu (pl. kanka), (Su. P. Isr.) kanu (pl. kaṇka) id. (DEDR 1159a)
Gundert Malayalam lexicon suggests that kannān 'brazier' is a Tadbhava.
Rebus: Ta. kaṉ copper work, copper, workmanship; kaṉṉāṉ brazier. Ma. kannān id.(DEDR 1402)
वृत्त vṛtta a S Circular. (Marath) vr̥ttá ʻ turned ʼ RV., ʻ rounded ʼ ŚBr. 2. ʻ completed ʼ MaitrUp., ʻ passed, elapsed (of time) ʼ KauṣUp. 3. n. ʻ conduct, matter ʼ ŚBr., ʻ livelihood ʼ Hariv. [√
1. Pa. vaṭṭa -- ʻ round ʼ, n. ʻ circle ʼ; Pk. vaṭṭa -- , vatta -- , vitta -- , vutta -- ʻ round ʼ; L. (Ju.) vaṭ m. ʻ anything twisted ʼ; Si. vaṭa ʻ round ʼ, vaṭa -- ya ʻ circle, girth (esp. of trees) ʼ; Md. va'ʻ round ʼ GS 58; -- Paš.ar. waṭṭəwīˊk, waḍḍawik ʻ kidney ʼ ( -- wĭ̄k
Rebus: वृत्त vṛtta n (S) Conduct, practice, course, customary procedure. 2 Profession, occupation, practice pursued as a means of subsistence. (Marathi) Pa. vatta -- n. ʻ duty, office ʼ; Pk. vaṭṭa -- , vatta -- , vitta -- , vutta -- n. ʻ livelihood ʼ; P. buttā m. ʻ means ʼ; Ku. buto ʻ daily labour, wages ʼ; N. butā ʻ means, ability ʼ; H. oūtā m. ʻ power ʼ; Si. vaṭa ʻ subsistence, wages ʼ.(CDIAL 12069)

கண்வட்டம் kaṇ-vaṭṭam , n. < id. +. 1. Range of vision, eye-sweep, full reach of one's observation; கண்பார்வைக்குட்பட்ட இடம். தங்கள் கண்வட்டத்திலே உண்டுடுத்துத்திரிகிற (ஈடு, 3, 5, 2). 2. Mint; நாணயசாலை.
The Indus Script inscription of the seal with the one-eyed person holding back two jumping titers signifies the metalwork catalogue of a copper mint. The one-eyed person is kannātti 'female brazier' dula 'two' rebus: dul 'metalcasting' PLUS kola 'tiger' rebus: kol 'working in iron/'. kũdā 'jumping' rebus: kunda 'fine gold', konda 'kiln, furnace'.
śrēṣṭrī 'ladder' Rebus: seṭh ʻ head of a guild, Members of the guild
kammatamu 'portable furnace' rebus: kammaTa 'mint, coiner, coinage'
sal 'splinter' rebus; sal 'workshop'
aya 'fish' rebus: aya 'iron' ayas 'alloy metal'
kaṇḍa 'arrow' rebus:kaṇḍa,khaṇḍa 'equipment'

kuṭhi 'tree' Rebus: kuṭhi 'smelting furnace‘; koṭe ‘forged metal’ (Santali)(Phonetic determinant of the twig on the horns of the woman ligatured to the tiger'
gaNDa 'four' rebus: kaNDa 'implements''fire-altar'
Four Dotted circles: Dotted circle hieroglyph is a cross-section of a strand of rope: S. dhāī f. ʻ wisp of fibres added from time to time to a rope that is being twisted ʼ, L. dhāī˜ f. Rebus: dhāˊtu n. ʻsubstance ʼ RV., m. ʻ element ʼ MBh., ʻ metal, mineral, ore (esp. of a red colour)ʼ; dhāū, dhāv m.f. ʻ a partic. soft red stone ʼ(Marathi) धवड (p. 436) [ dhavaḍa ] m (Or
Hieroglyph: ḍāv m. ʻdice-throwʼ rebus: dhāu 'ore'; dã̄u ʻtyingʼ, ḍāv m. ʻdice-throwʼ read rebus: dhāu 'ore' in the context of glosses: dhā̆vaḍ m. ʻa caste of iron -smelters', dhāvḍī ʻcomposed of or relating to ironʼ. Thus, three dotted circles signify: tri-dhāu, tri-dhātu 'three ores' (copper, tin, iron).





https://tinyurl.com/yxfo2otj see image of 'duck' on a seal together with one-horned young bull which has already been deciphered kunda singi 'fine gold, ornament gold'.

Grus Virgo or Numidian or Demoiselle Crane The Demoiselle Crane breeds in C Eurasia, from Black Sea to Mongolia and NE China. It winters in Indian Subcontinent and in Sub-Saharan Africa. http://www.oiseaux-birds.com/card-demoiselle-crane.html
Rebus: karaḍa 'hard alloy' of arka 'copper'.






Civilizational Epigraphy. Warka vase Indus Script hieroglyphs signify kāṇa metalwork wealth deposited into Guild Treasury
-- Picture-recognition (Machine Learning by a driver-less vehicle) of Indus Script hieroglyphs on Warka vase and layering semantics (Artificial Intelligence, matching/hypertext transfer protocol HTTP with Meluhha expressions in the Indus Script Cipher) from Meluhha Bhāratīya sprachbund 'speech union'.












Anthropomorph wrestling with buffalo & three sprouts Indus Script hieroglyphs on Akkadian cylinder seal ca. 2300 BCE
Indus script hieroglyphs on the Akkadian seal are:
1. horned anthropomorph ligatured to the hindpart of a bovine
2. buffalo
3. pair of buffalos
4. three sprouts
5. six locks of hair on anthropomorph
Horn: koḍ 'horn' koḍ 'artisan's workshop (Kuwi)
bovine: dhangar 'bull' rebus: dhangar, thakur 'blacksmith'
buffalo: rāngo 'water buffalo bull' (Ku.N.)(CDIAL 10559) rebus: rã̄g, rã̄gā ''
Pair of buffalos: dula 'pair' rebus: dul 'metal casting'
kor̤u 'sprout' rebus: kor̤u 'bar of metal' PLUS kolom 'three' rebus: kolimi 'smithy, forge'.
baṭa 'six' rebus: baṭa 'iron' bhaṭa 'furnace'.
Itihāsa. Historical significance of Confederate Flag in Capitol Hill, USA Jan. 6, 2021 -- Aria Bendix
- A photographer named Saul Loeb captured an image of a man carrying a large Confederate battle flag during the pro-Trump riot inside the US Capitol on Wednesday.
- Though the Confederate battle flag originated during the US
Civil War , it never entered the Capitol during that time. - Behind the man in the photo, two portraits reflect the fractured nation of the country during the 1860s.
- To the man's right is a portrait of Charles Sumner, an abolitionist. To his left is a portrait of John C. Calhoun, a defender of slavery.
As rioters stormed the US Capitol on Wednesday, a photographer named Saul Loeb managed to encapsulate the siege's dark historical context in a single image. His photo shows a man waving a Confederate battle flag in front of two portraits of Civil War-era figures in the Capitol Rotunda.
To the man's right is a portrait of Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts senator who protested slavery. To his left is a portrait of John C. Calhoun, the seventh US vice president, who was a staunch defender of slavery and heavily influenced the ideology that ultimately led to the South's secession.
The proximity of the two portraits calls to mind the fractured nature of US civil society in the 1860s - and the recent cleft that has widened in the lead-up and response to the 2020 election.
"What I find fascinating about that juxtaposition is its connections to violence, because of course [Sumner] was a victim of violence in the Capitol when he was attacked for having had made a speech critical of slavery," Judith Giesberg, a Civil War historian at Villanova University, told Business Insider. "What that image should remind us of is that there's a
Congress met Wednesday for a joint session to certify the electoral-vote count. At about the same time, thousands of supporters of President Donald
Trump urged his supporters to head to the Capitol, and with Congress in session rioters stormed the Capitol, forcing the House and the Senate to abruptly enter recess. Lawmakers, Hill staffers, and reporters took shelter in their offices before being evacuated. Trespassers sat in Vice President Mike Pence's chair in the Senate chamber, vandalized congressional offices, and stole items from the building.
Multiple police officers were injured in the violence, and a woman was fatally shot in an altercation with law enforcement, MSNBC's Pete Williams reported. Finally, shortly after 5:30 p.m. local time, the House of Representatives' sergeant at arms announced the Capitol had been secured. A 6 p.m. curfew was established for Washington.The photo's historical significanceThe Confederate battle flag originated during the Civil War for the pro-slavery secessionists, but historians say its significance as a political symbol emerged in the 20th century as a sign of resistance to racial integration. During the entire Civil War, from 1861 to 1865, the flag never entered the US Capitol. "The flag's significance during the Civil War has been grossly overstated," Giesberg said. "We have projected our experiences backward."
A January 2020 YouGov poll found that a plurality of Americans had come to view the
Giesberg said there's a deep irony behind the man carrying the Confederate flag in front of Sumner's portrait.
"It's striking to see [Sumner] juxtaposed with this person who represents what he most was offended by and what he stood against," she said.
All the more ironic, she added, was the proximity of Calhoun's portrait as well."Calhoun is perfect in this way, in so many ways, because this is a man who was no stranger to treason," Giesberg said. "He had done more probably than anybody else in the country to rehearse the events that would lead to succession, starting in November of 1860."

In July, the House voted to approve legislation to remove statues of Confederate figures and others such as Calhoun, who died before the South actually seceded, from the Capitol.The decision was in part a continuation of Sumner's legacy. In 1865, the abolitionist proposed that paintings hanging in the Capitol shouldn't portray scenes from the Civil War. In particular, he objected to a bust of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, who ruled in 1857 that Black Americans could not be considered citizens. Sumner "was certainly a vocal and resolute abolitionist," Giesberg said. "He was uncompromising in his critique of slavery and for that he paid, ultimately, a very heavy price."
Itihāsa. Exploring the Indian Ocean as a Rich Archive of History—Above and Below the Water Line -- isabel Hofmeyr & Charne Lavery
Note:
S. Kalyanaraman
The Indian Ocean provides a new way of looking at world history, a field of knowledge previously dominated by European accounts.
- Isabel Hofmeyr
- Charne Lavery
Credit: Shutterstock.
On many beaches around the Indian Ocean, keen observers may spot bits of broken pottery. Washed smooth by the ocean, these shards are in all likelihood hundreds of years old, from centres of ceramic production like the Middle Eastern Abbasid caliphate and the Chinese Ming dynasty.
Originally destined for Indian Ocean port cities, this pottery would have been purchased by merchant elites accustomed to eating off fine plates. These traders formed part of vast commercial networks that crisscrossed the Indian Ocean arena and beyond, from East Africa to Indonesia, the Middle East and China.
These trade networks stretched back thousands of years, powered by the monsoon winds. Reversing direction in different seasons, these winds have long shaped the rhythm of life around the ocean, bringing rain to farmers, filling the sails of dhows and enabling trade between different ecological zones.
The monsoon wind pattern makes the Indian Ocean relatively easy to cross both ways. In the Atlantic, by contrast, winds blow in one direction all year round. That’s why the Indian Ocean is the world’s oldest long-distance trans-oceanic trading arena, and is sometimes known as the cradle of globalization.
This cosmopolitan world has long fascinated scholars and has become a vibrant domain of research. Yet this work has had little to say about the sea itself. Its focus is on human movement with the ocean as a passive backdrop. In the age of rising sea levels and climate change, it’s important to learn more about the sea from a material and ecological point of view.
Over the past few years, this situation has started to shift. In this article we survey both the older and the newer forms of Indian Ocean studies, of surface and depth.
Surface Histories of the Indian Ocean
Given the long millennia of trade and exchange, one key concern of Indian Ocean studies has been a focus on cultural interaction. Cities on the shores have sustained deep forms of material, intellectual and cultural exchange, so that the denizens of these ports had more in common with each other than with their fellows inland.
This early cosmopolitan world has famously been explored in Amitav Ghosh’s In an Antique Land, which traces the travels of Abram bin Yiju, a 12th century Jewish Tunisian merchant based in Cairo and later in Mangalore, India. The book contrasts the rigidity of borders in the 1980s with the relative ease of movement in the late medieval Indian Ocean.
The Swahili coast provides another famed example of Indian Ocean cosmopolitanism. Stretching a thousand miles from Somalia to Mozambique, Swahili society arose from centuries of interaction between Africa, the Middle East and Asia.
Centred on coastal city states like Kilwa, Zanzibar and Lamu, Swahili trade networks reached far inland to present day Zimbabwe and outward to Persia, India and China. After reaching their height from the 12th to the 15th centuries, these city states were eventually undone by the Portuguese, who arrived from the early 16th century, seeking to establish a monopoly of the spice trade.
Zanzibar, Tanzania. Credit: GettyImages.
Central to these histories of mobility and exchange in the Indian Ocean has been the spread of Islam across land and sea from the 7th century CE. By the 14th century, mercantile networks around the Indian Ocean were almost entirely in the hands of Muslim traders.
In their wake came scholars, theologians, pilgrims, clerks, legal pundits and Sufi divines. Together, these groups created a shared economic, spiritual and legal frameworks. Sufism, a mystical form of Islam is an important strand in the Indian Ocean histories, as is the centrifugal power of the Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca.
European Colonization Along the Indian Ocean
When the Portuguese rounded the Cape in the late 15th century, they entered what many have termed a Muslim Lake, dominated in the north by the Turkish Ottoman, Persian Safavid and Indian Mughal empires. When the Dutch arrived in the Indian Ocean in the 17th century, “they were able to go from one end of it to another by carrying letters of introduction from Muslim sultans on various shores”.
As Engseng Ho has indicated, these sprawling networks of Muslim commerce operated without the backing of an army or a state.
The Portuguese, Dutch and English in the Indian Ocean were strange new traders who brought their states with them. They created militarised trading-post empires in the Indian Ocean, following Venetian and Genoese precedents in the Mediterranean, and were wont to do business at the point of a gun.
Early European entrants to the Indian Ocean world initially had to adapt to the trading orders that they encountered. But by the 19th century, European empires dominated. Their military, transport and communication infrastructure intensified the movement of people across the Indian Ocean world.
As Clare Anderson has demonstrated, much of this mobility was forced and conscripted. It involved slaves, indentured labourers, political exiles and prisoners who were transported between regions. At times, these systems built on existing foundations of labour exploitation. As recent research indicates, South Asian indentured labour was often taken from regions in India where slavery existed. Old and new systems of unfree labour produced an archipelago of prisons, plantations and penal colonies.
As an archive, the Indian Ocean provides a new way of looking at world history, that has previously been dominated by European accounts. The age of European empires is only one tiny sliver of time in a much longer arc. A view from the Indian Ocean unsettles ideas of the relationship between European colonizers and colonized groups.
As historians like Engseng Ho and Sugata Bose have argued, the Indian Ocean world was an arena of competing claims.
The ambitions of British imperialism, for example, were countered by the equally grand visions of Islam. Indeed, the Indian Ocean arena produced a rich repertoire of transoceanic ideologies, including Hindu reformism and pan-Buddhism.
Such ideologies eventually acquired an anti-imperial character which also fed into ideas of Afro-Asian solidarity and non-alignment. These arose from the Bandung Conference in 1955 at which 29 newly independent nations gathered to forge a new path rather than falling in line with either of the rival camps in the emerging Cold War.
The Belt and Road Initiative. Credit: Shutterstock.
In the 21st century, these older alliances have come under pressure as China and India elbow each other for dominance in the Indian Ocean. China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative involves massive transport and port infrastructure and aims to extend China’s footprint across much of the Indian Ocean arena. In response, New Delhi has bolstered its economic and military activity in this domain.
Deep Histories of the Indian Ocean
While the uniquely well-travelled surface of the Indian Ocean has received much attention, its depths barely register in the cultural or historical imagination. Its waters constitute nearly 20% of the ocean’s total volume, and its deepest point, the Sunda Deep of the Java Trench, lies nearly 8km below the surface. Yet its seafloor, like much of the world’s oceans, is largely unmapped.
Seafloor features determine weather patterns, fish concentrations and tsunami dynamics. Initial explorations by mining companies revealed mineral-rich deposits on submarine volcanic vents, while new species are continually being discovered.
The deep Indian Ocean is far less studied than the depths of the other oceans, for economic reasons: it is ringed by underdeveloped countries. The second International Indian Ocean Expedition was launched only in 2015, fifty years after the first. It aims to increase understanding about the oceanographic and biological characteristics of this undersampled ocean, as well as the ways in which it is changing.
Maldives Indian Ocean coral reef. Credit: Shutterstock.
Paying attention to the submarine world is becoming increasingly important in a time of climate change prompted by human activities. The Indian Ocean is warming faster than any of the other oceans, holding more than 70% of all the heat absorbed by the upper ocean since 2003. Indian Ocean islands – the Maldives being a well-known example – are already being submerged by rising global sea levels.
Cyclone patterns are shifting further south and happening more often as a result of the ocean’s rising temperature. The monsoon, which underpinned the Indian Ocean’s shipping networks and the rainfall patterns on its coastlines, is losing its power and predictability.
Deities, Spirits and Ancestors
While the Indian Ocean’s depths are in many ways opaque, they are not unpopulated in people’s imaginations. The ocean bustles with water deities, djinns, mermaids and ancestral spirits – a mythical submarine world that reflects the cosmopolitanism of its land populations.
In southern Africa this mix is especially rich: Khoisan/ First Nation water sprites, Muslim djinns introduced by South East Asian slaves, African ancestors, one of whose domains is the ocean, and British imperial ideas about the romance of the sea.
These ideas encounter each other and turn bodies of water into rich sites of memory and history. They have been explored by the Oceanic Humanities for the Global South project. Work by Confidence Joseph, Oupa Sibeko, Mapule Mohulatsi and Ryan Poinasamy explores the literary and artistic imaginations of southern Africa’s creolized waters.
Afrofuturist science fiction is also turning to the deep Indian Ocean. Mohale Mashigo’s Floating Rugs is situated in a submarine community on South Africa’s east coast. Mia Couto’s stories from the Mozambican coastline have long paired myths of mermaids with marine biology. Yvonne Adhiambo Owuor’s novel The Dragonfly Sea links contemporary Afro-Asian networks to the undersea.
Deep Sea Mining
Some exploration of the deep ocean can seem science-fictional, but isn’t.
The International Seabed Authority, a branch of the United Nations in operation since 2001 and responsible for parcelling out potential marine mining areas, has granted contracts for mining exploration in the Indian Ocean. At the same time, researchers are discovering an astonishing number of new deep ocean species on the same sites.
Underwater pearl farm. Credit: Getty Images.
The submarine world has long been plundered for riches. Histories of pearl diving in the Indian Ocean – as in a central scene of Jules Verne’s Twenty Thousand Leagues under the Sea – are continued in today’s illegal abalone trade. Poachers on the coast of South Africa don scuba gear to harvest abalone to trade with Asian markets, linking the undersea to Indian Ocean criminal underworlds, along the same lines as the ancient trade networks.
At times these networks are the source of treasure. On the Island of Mozambique, for instance, the shards of blue pottery that were traded around the Indian Ocean are one of the objects of the active treasure hunting trade today. While some of the treasures are sold by dealers in antiquities, others provide crucial evidence for maritime archaeological research. Recently, the Slave Wrecks Project has discovered slave shipwrecks that provide concrete symbols of the transatlantic slave trade and link it to histories of Indian Ocean slavery and indenture.
The old waterfronts of East African port cities like Mombasa, Zanzibar and Lamu are dominated by buildings with a pure white finish. This present-day architecture echoes a centuries-old tradition of building houses, mosques and tombs from white coral stone and dressed with lime plaster. Made from shells and corals that began their life under the sea, this luminous plaster made port cities visible from afar to incoming vessels.
The ocean’s submarine life and its human histories are always entangled. And now writers, artists and scholars are increasingly drawing attention to their connectedness.
Isabel Hofmeyr is Professor of African Literature at the University of the Witwatersrand.
Charne Lavery is a Lecturer and Research Associate at the University of the Witwatersrand.
Seal found with a skeleton in Mohenjo-daro tragedy is a metalwork catalogue of bell-metal, alloy-metal mint of an ornament gold-smith
The following Blogpost presents details of the context of the 'tragedy' at Mohenjodaro, described by John Marshall:
I will focus on the decipherment of the seal.
Field symbol: hieroglyphs/hypertexts of: 1. forward-thrusting, spiny-horned young bull' and 2. standard device composition of 'lathe' on upper register and 'portable furnace' on the bottom register.
Decipherment: singhin 'forward-thrusting, spiny-horned' rebus: singi 'ornament gold' PLUS खोंड [khōṇḍa] m A young bull, a bullcalf' rebus: kōṇḍa 'fire-trench with live coals' agnikuṇḍa 'sacred fire-altar'; rebus: कोंद kōnda 'engraver, lapidary setting or infixing gems'; kō̃da
Text message: from r. to l.
Sign 267 is oval=shape variant, rhombus-shape of a bun ingot. Like Sign 373, this sign also signifies mũhã̄ 'bun ingot' PLUS kanac 'corner' rebus: kancu 'bell-metal'.kaṁsá
sal 'splinter' rebus: sal 'workshop'
with infixed hieroglyph of sprout, Sign 169) has the shape of oval or lozenge is the shape of a bun ingot. mũhã̄ = the quantity of iron produced atone time in a native smelting furnace of the Kolhes; iron produced by the Kolhes and formed likea four-cornered piece a little pointed at each end; mūhā mẽṛhẽt = iron smelted by the Kolhes andformed into an equilateral lump a little pointed at each of four ends; kolhe tehen mẽṛhẽt komūhā akata = the Kolhes have to-day produced pig iron (Santali). Thus, Sign 373 signifies word, mũhã̄ 'bun ingot'. PLUS kor̤u 'sprout' Rebus: kor̤u 'bar of metal' Thus, bar of metal ingot.
Sign 67 fish + fish-fin
ayo 'fish' rebus: aya 'iron' ayas 'alloy metal' PLUS khambhaṛā ʻfinʼ rebus: kammaṭa 'coiner, coinage, mint (Kannada)
karã̄ n. pl. wristlets, bangles Rebus: khār 'blacksmith' PLUS dula 'two' rebus: dul 'metal casting'
kolma 'rice plant' rebus: kolimi 'smithy, forge'.
Thus, the seal from Mohenjo-daro found with one of the victims of the 'tragedy' signifies metalwork catalogue of work done in smithy,forge; alloy metal mint; producing bar of metal ingot; bell-metal workshop.
Itihāsa. Gāndhāri's curse & start of Kali Yuga 36 years after Mahābhārata War -- Jayasree Saranathan
Jayasree Saranathan presents astrological arguments validating the beginning of Kaliyuga in 3102 BCE and hence, the MBh war 36 years before this date, consistent with Gāndhāri's curse mentioned in the MBh. text in reference to the exit of Sri Kr̥ṣṇa.
Kudos to Dr. Smt. Jayasree Saranathan.
This date of 3102 in a hallowed Hindu tradition for over thousand-three-hundred years from ca. 600 CE recorded in 436 inscriptions, as detailed in Kaliyuga-Inscriptional Evidence by Dr. ML Raja
Āryabhaṭīya emphatically records the beginning of Kaliyuga at 3102 BCE.
Āryabhaṭīya
10. When three yugapādas and sixty times sixty years had elapsed (from the beginning of the yuga) then twenty-three years of my life had passed.
“If Āryabhaṭa began the Kaliyuga at 3102 BCE as later astronomers did, and if his fourth yugapāda began with the beginning of the Kaliyuga, we arrive at the date 499 CE. It is natural to take this as the date of composition of the treatise. “ (The Āryabhaṭīya of Āryabhaṭa—an Ancient Indian work on Mathematics and Astronomy, tr. By Walter Eugene Clark, Univ. of Chicago Press, Illinois, 1930 (pp.54-55)
Source: https://archive.org/stream/The_Aryabhatiya_of_Aryabhata_Clark_1930#page/n3/mode/2up
Any date of MBh war arrived at by astronomers from the textual references in MBh text should be consistent with this hallowed tradition.
Kalyan

- Jayasree Saranathan Ph.D
- India
- Sanatana Dharmi.
Friday, December 25, 2020
Validating the Traditional date of Mahabharata War: Determining the date of Kali Yuga (Part 1)
On this auspicious day of Vaikuntha Ekadasi when Vishnu, the Atman, as the Sun in his chariot in Margashira, instructs the self, in the nature of the Moon, having taken refuge at His feet, let Jayam spring up from this upavāsa.
nārāyaṇaṃ namaskṛtya naraṃ caiva narottamam devīṃ sarasvatīṃ caiva tato jayam udīrayetThe date of Mahabharata War is as contentious as the war itself !
The date, already embedded within the Itihāsa, is lost from sight due to various causes, the important one being our lack of knowledge of the features of the calendar system in vogue ever since Krishna left his mortal coils. The Kali Maha Yuga calendar started since then. Thirty five years before that, the Mahabharata war was fought. This offers the best hint to arrive at the year of the war which can be cross-checked with the astronomy references found in the text.
Here comes the next issue of locating the astronomy positions precisely. We are not able to locate the astronomy positions concurring with the date derived from the Kali date and we fail to understand the cause for it. The only external element being the simulator in use, we fail to probe that external element but instead start finding fault with the verses or manipulate the verses of Mahabharata.
These two issues are to be resolved– Kali Yuga date and the precise astronomy positions - before I begin decoding the verses to validate the Traditional date of the war.
On this auspicious day of Vaikuntha Ekadasi when Vishnu, the Atman, as the Sun in his chariot in Margashira, instructs the self, in the nature of the Moon, having taken refuge at His feet, let Jayam spring up from this upavāsa.
The date of Mahabharata War is as contentious as the war itself !
The date, already embedded within the Itihāsa, is lost from sight due to various causes, the important one being our lack of knowledge of the features of the calendar system in vogue ever since Krishna left his mortal coils. The Kali Maha Yuga calendar started since then. Thirty five years before that, the Mahabharata war was fought. This offers the best hint to arrive at the year of the war which can be cross-checked with the astronomy references found in the text.
Here comes the next issue of locating the astronomy positions precisely. We are not able to locate the astronomy positions concurring with the date derived from the Kali date and we fail to understand the cause for it. The only external element being the simulator in use, we fail to probe that external element but instead start finding fault with the verses or manipulate the verses of Mahabharata.
These two issues are to be resolved– Kali Yuga date and the precise astronomy positions - before I begin decoding the verses to validate the Traditional date of the war.
Kali Yuga date forms the basis for deriving the date of Mahabharata war.
Very often we come across references to Kali Yuga in Mahabharata – mostly used in the context of dharma (or adharma) prevailing then. When adharmic fighting technique was used by Bhima to slay Duryodhana, Krishna himself said, “prāptaṃ kaliyugaṃ viddhi”[1]
{Prāptā = attained to, reached to.
Viddhi = the act of piercing, perforating (second person singular present imperative class 2 parasmaipada √vid)}
If this is construed as referring to the start of Kali Maha Yuga, then we must justify another verse, pertaining to the entry of Kali in Parikshit’s time. Parikshit needs no external citation, for, his name was mentioned by Krishna himself after Aswattama shot his astra to destroy the fetus growing in the womb of Uttarā, the wife of Abhimanyu, his nephew. Krishna said that the fetus would be saved and the son born would be known as Parikshit and would rule for sixty years.[2]
Parikshit came to the throne after the Pandavas relinquished the throne which happened soon after Krishna left the world. On the day of exit of Krishna, Kali Maha Yuga started, says the same author Vyasa in Srimad Bhagavatam at two places.[3]
We have two entries of Kali by now – one at the time of Bhima killing Duryodhana and another after Krishna left this world. And for the third time we see the entry of Kali “kaliṁ praviṣṭaṁ” after Parikshit started ruling the country.[4] However Parikshit succeeded in restraining Kali from entering his country but remain in five designated places.[5] So who is this Kali who entered here?
We have to gauge the circumstances and the meaning together. At the time of the war and at Parikshit’s time the Kali’s entry was about Adharma setting in. Whenever Adharma exceeded Dharma, it was said that Kali had entered. Malyavan, the maternal grandfather of Ravana warned Ravana that, “when adharma swallows dharma, it stimulates Kali yuga” and this dialogue took place in Treta Yuga![6] Similarly we come across a reference to the entry of Kali in Treta Yuga when the sage Chyavana, covered inside an anthill due to his continuous penance, started watching the young girl Sukanya without her knowledge. This was told by the sage Lomasa in Dwapara Yuga in Mahabharata![7]
So Kali could enter Treta Yuga and Dwapara Yuga but remain muted in Kali Yuga when it had to be active. This shows that we need to do contextual analysis of the Kali verses in Mahabharata to understand whether it is about an increase in Adharma or a reference to the Time scale.
In the Time scale, there are sub divisions and units to measure time. The solar year is the basic unit and 4,32,000 solar years make the duration of this Kali Yuga. The Kali Yuga duration in turn becomes the basic unit of the Catur Maha Yuga. Two times the Kali Yuga duration is Dwapara Yuga; three times the duration is Treta Yuga; four times the duration is Krita Yuga. Thus from Krita to Kali, the time period can be expressed as 4:3:2:1 in which 1 part is equal to 4,32,000 years which is the duration of Kali Yuga. Basically all the Yugas are measured in solar years, or in other words, by the celestial entity. This in turn suggests that only celestial entities mark the beginning and the end date of the Yugas. We do come across such reference, only when we search the relevant texts- the relevant texts being the Jyothisha Siddhantas.
“Gruha sāmānyam Yugam” says Aryabhatiya, a Tantra Siddhanta. [8] Here Catur Maha Yuga is identified in terms of planets sharing commonality or coming together. Traditionally it is being held that all the planets except one of the nodes congregated near zero degree Aries when Kali Yuga began. Most scholars are skeptical about this feature that it is fictitious and not supported by any textual reference. The major reason is that they are not able to get this congregation at the traditional date of Kali Yuga!
It is indeed true that we are not able to get a direct citation from any text. However a combined reading of Aryabhatiya and Surya Siddhanta offers an indirect reference to the grouping of planets at the beginning of Aries.
Aryabhatiya does refer to the congregation of all the planets except Rahu at the beginning of Aries when Krita Yuga started on a Wednesday.[9] Can this be taken to mean that this congregation repeats at the beginning Kali Yuga, having the basic unit of time of the Catur Maha Yuga (4,32,000)? In the absence of any explicit citation in support of this we have to analyze the existing verses. Going by the Aryabhatiya verse quoted above, the congregation must repeat at the beginning of every Krita Yuga that starts after 10 rounds of the duration of Kali Yuga (4+3+2+1).[10]
Here we get to see a verse from Surya Siddhanta saying that at the END of Krita Yuga the mean places of the all the planets except the nodes coincide with each other at the first point of stellar Aries.[11] This means that the planets congregate at Aries at the beginning of Treta Yuga, after crossing 4 parts of Krita Yuga each having the duration of 4,32,000 years. If it is assumed that this congregation occurs for the second time after the previous one happening at the beginning of Krita Yuga, it upsets the very idea of such a congregation, for the reason, the subsequent congregation can occur at the middle of Dvapara Yuga (3 parts of Treta + 1 part of Dvapara) and further next, at the middle of Krita Yuga (remaining 1 part of Dvapara + 1 part of Kali Yuga + 2 parts of Krita Yuga). This cannot be true going by the mandatory requirement of the congregation at the beginning of Krita Yuga.
This leaves us with only two probable choices for the congregation of planets, either at the beginning of every 4,32,000 years or at the beginning of double that time. If the second choice is taken, there won’t be a congregation at the beginning of Kali Yuga. Kali Yuga being the basic unit of the Yuga, there must be some form of identification to mark its beginning. Except planetary movements no other markers are available or cited in any text. Therefore the second choice is ruled out. This leaves us with the first choice which is logically tenable in that being the basic unit of the Catur Yuga. In other words, all the planets come together at the beginning of Aries once in 4,32,000 years. By implication this means that any specific planetary configuration cannot occur more than once within the period of 4,32,000 years.
Vyasa on noticing the gathering of all planets at the beginning of Aries sensed the arrival of the new Yuga. When he came to know about the exit of Krishna, that was a clinching evidence of the arrival of Kali Yuga. Any derivation of the sky map for the date of Kali Yuga must have all the planets (with the exception of Rahu as stated in Aryabhatiya) close to zero degree of Aries.
That date can be derived from the simulator – not in tropical simulator but in astrology simulators using the ayanamsa as zero. [12] (Figure 1)
Fig 1: The Date of Kali Yuga with the conjunction of all the planets at zero degree Aries.
Eight planets except Rahu congregated at zero degree Aries with most of them at the last one or two degrees of Pisces. The date was 22nd January of 3101 BCE in the Gregorian calendar (including the 0 year). This corresponds to the year Pramathi, Amawasya in Caitra when the sun and the moon joined at the beginning of Aries on a Thursday. Traditionally these are the exact Pancanga features at the time of the beginning of Kali Yuga. A new Epoch was born by which the world became different after that.
One may recall a near similar congregation on 26th December 2019, when six planets congregated at the sign, Sagittarius. (Figure 2) It was followed by a complete change in the life of the people around the world with the advent of the Covid-19 virus.
Fig 2: Six planets congregated at Sagittarius before the global outbreak of Covid 19.
This is to show that this kind of large scale changes are noticed when many planets congregate at a strategic corner accompanied with a solar eclipse. We are finding only this kind of description in Mahabharata, and not the language of the astronomers. All the astronomy references of Mahabharata were spelt by associating with some calamity or fear of calamity. When a result is associated with planetary features, it is no longer about astronomy; it enters the domain of astrology.
When we compare the two figures we will see a difference in the ayanamsa. Figure 1 was simulated for zero ayanamsa as deduced from Surya Siddhanta concept of the equinoxes. Figure 2 is simulated to the current ayanamsa (based on current location of equinox). Suppose the ayanamsa is changed for Figure 2, the planetary features would not be the same. This addresses the 2nd issue raised earlier on getting the exact planetary positions.
Only when we simulate for zero ayanamsa we get the exact planetary positions. Figure 1 showing the Kali Yuga combination is a solid proof for this. Since a new Yuga starts at the conjunction at zero degree Aries with the tropical equinox coinciding with the sidereal equinox, we have to check the astronomy features of Mahabharata only for the Surya Siddhanta ayanamsa.
Very often we come across references to Kali Yuga in Mahabharata – mostly used in the context of dharma (or adharma) prevailing then. When adharmic fighting technique was used by Bhima to slay Duryodhana, Krishna himself said, “prāptaṃ kaliyugaṃ viddhi”[1]
{Prāptā = attained to, reached to.
Viddhi = the act of piercing, perforating (second person singular present imperative class 2 parasmaipada √vid)}
If this is construed as referring to the start of Kali Maha Yuga, then we must justify another verse, pertaining to the entry of Kali in Parikshit’s time. Parikshit needs no external citation, for, his name was mentioned by Krishna himself after Aswattama shot his astra to destroy the fetus growing in the womb of Uttarā, the wife of Abhimanyu, his nephew. Krishna said that the fetus would be saved and the son born would be known as Parikshit and would rule for sixty years.[2]
Parikshit came to the throne after the Pandavas relinquished the throne which happened soon after Krishna left the world. On the day of exit of Krishna, Kali Maha Yuga started, says the same author Vyasa in Srimad Bhagavatam at two places.[3]
We have two entries of Kali by now – one at the time of Bhima killing Duryodhana and another after Krishna left this world. And for the third time we see the entry of Kali “kaliṁ praviṣṭaṁ” after Parikshit started ruling the country.[4] However Parikshit succeeded in restraining Kali from entering his country but remain in five designated places.[5] So who is this Kali who entered here?
We have to gauge the circumstances and the meaning together. At the time of the war and at Parikshit’s time the Kali’s entry was about Adharma setting in. Whenever Adharma exceeded Dharma, it was said that Kali had entered. Malyavan, the maternal grandfather of Ravana warned Ravana that, “when adharma swallows dharma, it stimulates Kali yuga” and this dialogue took place in Treta Yuga![6] Similarly we come across a reference to the entry of Kali in Treta Yuga when the sage Chyavana, covered inside an anthill due to his continuous penance, started watching the young girl Sukanya without her knowledge. This was told by the sage Lomasa in Dwapara Yuga in Mahabharata![7]
So Kali could enter Treta Yuga and Dwapara Yuga but remain muted in Kali Yuga when it had to be active. This shows that we need to do contextual analysis of the Kali verses in Mahabharata to understand whether it is about an increase in Adharma or a reference to the Time scale.
In the Time scale, there are sub divisions and units to measure time. The solar year is the basic unit and 4,32,000 solar years make the duration of this Kali Yuga. The Kali Yuga duration in turn becomes the basic unit of the Catur Maha Yuga. Two times the Kali Yuga duration is Dwapara Yuga; three times the duration is Treta Yuga; four times the duration is Krita Yuga. Thus from Krita to Kali, the time period can be expressed as 4:3:2:1 in which 1 part is equal to 4,32,000 years which is the duration of Kali Yuga. Basically all the Yugas are measured in solar years, or in other words, by the celestial entity. This in turn suggests that only celestial entities mark the beginning and the end date of the Yugas. We do come across such reference, only when we search the relevant texts- the relevant texts being the Jyothisha Siddhantas.
“Gruha sāmānyam Yugam” says Aryabhatiya, a Tantra Siddhanta. [8] Here Catur Maha Yuga is identified in terms of planets sharing commonality or coming together. Traditionally it is being held that all the planets except one of the nodes congregated near zero degree Aries when Kali Yuga began. Most scholars are skeptical about this feature that it is fictitious and not supported by any textual reference. The major reason is that they are not able to get this congregation at the traditional date of Kali Yuga!
It is indeed true that we are not able to get a direct citation from any text. However a combined reading of Aryabhatiya and Surya Siddhanta offers an indirect reference to the grouping of planets at the beginning of Aries.
Aryabhatiya does refer to the congregation of all the planets except Rahu at the beginning of Aries when Krita Yuga started on a Wednesday.[9] Can this be taken to mean that this congregation repeats at the beginning Kali Yuga, having the basic unit of time of the Catur Maha Yuga (4,32,000)? In the absence of any explicit citation in support of this we have to analyze the existing verses. Going by the Aryabhatiya verse quoted above, the congregation must repeat at the beginning of every Krita Yuga that starts after 10 rounds of the duration of Kali Yuga (4+3+2+1).[10]
Here we get to see a verse from Surya Siddhanta saying that at the END of Krita Yuga the mean places of the all the planets except the nodes coincide with each other at the first point of stellar Aries.[11] This means that the planets congregate at Aries at the beginning of Treta Yuga, after crossing 4 parts of Krita Yuga each having the duration of 4,32,000 years. If it is assumed that this congregation occurs for the second time after the previous one happening at the beginning of Krita Yuga, it upsets the very idea of such a congregation, for the reason, the subsequent congregation can occur at the middle of Dvapara Yuga (3 parts of Treta + 1 part of Dvapara) and further next, at the middle of Krita Yuga (remaining 1 part of Dvapara + 1 part of Kali Yuga + 2 parts of Krita Yuga). This cannot be true going by the mandatory requirement of the congregation at the beginning of Krita Yuga.
This leaves us with only two probable choices for the congregation of planets, either at the beginning of every 4,32,000 years or at the beginning of double that time. If the second choice is taken, there won’t be a congregation at the beginning of Kali Yuga. Kali Yuga being the basic unit of the Yuga, there must be some form of identification to mark its beginning. Except planetary movements no other markers are available or cited in any text. Therefore the second choice is ruled out. This leaves us with the first choice which is logically tenable in that being the basic unit of the Catur Yuga. In other words, all the planets come together at the beginning of Aries once in 4,32,000 years. By implication this means that any specific planetary configuration cannot occur more than once within the period of 4,32,000 years.
Vyasa on noticing the gathering of all planets at the beginning of Aries sensed the arrival of the new Yuga. When he came to know about the exit of Krishna, that was a clinching evidence of the arrival of Kali Yuga. Any derivation of the sky map for the date of Kali Yuga must have all the planets (with the exception of Rahu as stated in Aryabhatiya) close to zero degree of Aries.
That date can be derived from the simulator – not in tropical simulator but in astrology simulators using the ayanamsa as zero. [12] (Figure 1)
Fig 1: The Date of Kali Yuga with the conjunction of all the planets at zero degree Aries.
Eight planets except Rahu congregated at zero degree Aries with most of them at the last one or two degrees of Pisces. The date was 22nd January of 3101 BCE in the Gregorian calendar (including the 0 year). This corresponds to the year Pramathi, Amawasya in Caitra when the sun and the moon joined at the beginning of Aries on a Thursday. Traditionally these are the exact Pancanga features at the time of the beginning of Kali Yuga. A new Epoch was born by which the world became different after that.
One may recall a near similar congregation on 26th December 2019, when six planets congregated at the sign, Sagittarius. (Figure 2) It was followed by a complete change in the life of the people around the world with the advent of the Covid-19 virus.
Fig 2: Six planets congregated at Sagittarius before the global outbreak of Covid 19.
This is to show that this kind of large scale changes are noticed when many planets congregate at a strategic corner accompanied with a solar eclipse. We are finding only this kind of description in Mahabharata, and not the language of the astronomers. All the astronomy references of Mahabharata were spelt by associating with some calamity or fear of calamity. When a result is associated with planetary features, it is no longer about astronomy; it enters the domain of astrology.
When we compare the two figures we will see a difference in the ayanamsa. Figure 1 was simulated for zero ayanamsa as deduced from Surya Siddhanta concept of the equinoxes. Figure 2 is simulated to the current ayanamsa (based on current location of equinox). Suppose the ayanamsa is changed for Figure 2, the planetary features would not be the same. This addresses the 2nd issue raised earlier on getting the exact planetary positions.
Only when we simulate for zero ayanamsa we get the exact planetary positions. Figure 1 showing the Kali Yuga combination is a solid proof for this. Since a new Yuga starts at the conjunction at zero degree Aries with the tropical equinox coinciding with the sidereal equinox, we have to check the astronomy features of Mahabharata only for the Surya Siddhanta ayanamsa.
Inscriptional evidence for Kali Yuga date
Further corroboration comes from the inscription of Janamejaya, the son of Pariskhit, quoted by Kota Venkatachela Paakayaaji in his book[13] from Indian Antiquary P.P. 383 334.The inscription was issued in the 29th regnal year of the king Janamejaya to Lord Sitaram temple on the banks of Tungabhadra River, in today’s Hampi. The Pancanga features were Plavanga year, Amawasya, Monday and Sahasya month referring to Pushya month. Only the star of the day is not given. These four out of five features of the Panchanga were checked in astrology software.[14] The horoscopy chart generated for these details show that the month was Tapasya (Phalguna). The year exactly matching with the count from the Kali Yuga year (Pramathi), and other Pancanga features concurring exactly, it is deduced that Tapasya was mistakenly written as Sahasya. (Figure 3)
Fig 3: The date of Janamejaya inscription
In 89 years after the start of Kali Yuga, the ayanamsa had moved by a degree.
Another inscription indicating the Kali date is from Aihole issued in the name of Pulikesin II, but there is a controversy regarding the event mentioned there. The year matches with 3101 BCE, but the event referred to is ‘Bhāratādāhāvāditah’ – interpreted as referring to the time of the war. This is incongruous since the date concurs with that of the Traditional Kali Yuga date and validated by the planetary and Pancanga features. There is either a mistake in the letters or in our understanding of the word.
This expression is much like ‘Bhāratāt Purvam’ used by Aryabhata to indicate the beginning of Kali Yuga, that was interpreted by ancient commentators as referring to Bhāratā (Pandavas) relinquishing the throne.[15] The Bhāratā renounced everything and cast off their sacred fires too.[16] Bhāratā dāha avādita could refer to the sacrifice of the Bharata clan after coming to know of Krishna’s demise (when Kali Yuga started). The time of Pulikesin II coming within 150 years of Aryabhata, this kind of reference to the start of Kali Yuga seems to be widespread in use. The other way of looking at it is that a powerful and prosperous king like Pulikesin II could have found it difficult to ascribe to the view that Kali was running in his country, much like Parikshit who detested the presence of Kali. Perhaps this made him pick out the alternate marker for the Yuga beginning, the sacrifice of the Bhāratā (Pandavas) on coming to know of Krishna’s exit.
Further corroboration comes from the inscription of Janamejaya, the son of Pariskhit, quoted by Kota Venkatachela Paakayaaji in his book[13] from Indian Antiquary P.P. 383 334.The inscription was issued in the 29th regnal year of the king Janamejaya to Lord Sitaram temple on the banks of Tungabhadra River, in today’s Hampi. The Pancanga features were Plavanga year, Amawasya, Monday and Sahasya month referring to Pushya month. Only the star of the day is not given. These four out of five features of the Panchanga were checked in astrology software.[14] The horoscopy chart generated for these details show that the month was Tapasya (Phalguna). The year exactly matching with the count from the Kali Yuga year (Pramathi), and other Pancanga features concurring exactly, it is deduced that Tapasya was mistakenly written as Sahasya. (Figure 3)
Fig 3: The date of Janamejaya inscription
In 89 years after the start of Kali Yuga, the ayanamsa had moved by a degree.
Another inscription indicating the Kali date is from Aihole issued in the name of Pulikesin II, but there is a controversy regarding the event mentioned there. The year matches with 3101 BCE, but the event referred to is ‘Bhāratādāhāvāditah’ – interpreted as referring to the time of the war. This is incongruous since the date concurs with that of the Traditional Kali Yuga date and validated by the planetary and Pancanga features. There is either a mistake in the letters or in our understanding of the word.
This expression is much like ‘Bhāratāt Purvam’ used by Aryabhata to indicate the beginning of Kali Yuga, that was interpreted by ancient commentators as referring to Bhāratā (Pandavas) relinquishing the throne.[15] The Bhāratā renounced everything and cast off their sacred fires too.[16] Bhāratā dāha avādita could refer to the sacrifice of the Bharata clan after coming to know of Krishna’s demise (when Kali Yuga started). The time of Pulikesin II coming within 150 years of Aryabhata, this kind of reference to the start of Kali Yuga seems to be widespread in use. The other way of looking at it is that a powerful and prosperous king like Pulikesin II could have found it difficult to ascribe to the view that Kali was running in his country, much like Parikshit who detested the presence of Kali. Perhaps this made him pick out the alternate marker for the Yuga beginning, the sacrifice of the Bhāratā (Pandavas) on coming to know of Krishna’s exit.
Deriving the date of Mahabharata War from Kali Yuga.
Once having established the date of Kali Yuga at 3101 BCE, it is not difficult to derive the date of Mahabharata War. There was a gap of 35 years between the war and the exit of Krishna.
On seeing the death of her children and all relatives in the war Gandhari vented out her frustration at Krishna that he (Krishna) after causing the slaughter of his kinsmen would perish in the wilderness on the 36th year.[17] On the 36th year a huge carnage did take place wiping out the Krishna-clan.
When the 36th year (after the war) arrived Yudhishthira noticed many unusual omens, says the first chapter of Mausala Parva.[18] In the next chapter it is said that a great calamity overtook the Vrishnis on the 36th year. [19] In the third chapter, Krishna on seeing the inauspicious omens understood that the thirty sixth year had arrived when Gandhari’s curse given out of grief of losing her children was about to happen.[20]
Once having established the date of Kali Yuga at 3101 BCE, it is not difficult to derive the date of Mahabharata War. There was a gap of 35 years between the war and the exit of Krishna.
On seeing the death of her children and all relatives in the war Gandhari vented out her frustration at Krishna that he (Krishna) after causing the slaughter of his kinsmen would perish in the wilderness on the 36th year.[17] On the 36th year a huge carnage did take place wiping out the Krishna-clan.
When the 36th year (after the war) arrived Yudhishthira noticed many unusual omens, says the first chapter of Mausala Parva.[18] In the next chapter it is said that a great calamity overtook the Vrishnis on the 36th year. [19] In the third chapter, Krishna on seeing the inauspicious omens understood that the thirty sixth year had arrived when Gandhari’s curse given out of grief of losing her children was about to happen.[20]
What is special about the number 36?
The number 36 has a special relevance for the welfare of one’s progeny. A 36-year sacrifice (sattra) was in vogue during Mahabharata times. It is known from Pancavimsa Brahmana that the descendants of Sakti had conducted 36 year sattra.[21] By the mention of Gauriviti as one who did the satttra[22] , Sakti is identified as the father of Parasara whose son was Vyasa.. It is further said in the Brahmana text that the one who performs this sattra gets rulership and also ten strong sons.[23] Without doubt this sattra must have been popular with the Kauravas, the Pandavas and the Vrishinis.
As biological descendants of Vyasa, the Kuru kings could have performed the sattra. Perhaps the Kauravas could not complete the 36 year long sattra[24] or else they could have won the war, retained rulership and children. It is doubtful the Pandavas had completed the sattra in view of the exile they had to undertake. Only the Vrishinis had survived the war and were expected to prosper more in the years after the war. The Vrishnis headed by Krishna were very clever in having chosen to support both the warring sides. Whichever side wins the war, the Vrishnis would bring home the advantages of the winner.
Gandhari’s anger naturally turned towards Krishna who she accused as not having worked enough to avert the slaughter of the Kuru-s. The Kauravas lost their progeny, so did the Pandavas by the time the war ended, but only the Vrishnis survived! The Vrishnis were already known for wealth creation and didn’t mind relocating to newer terrains (Dvaraka) to safeguard their wealth, works and resources.[25] Their clan continued to be intact after the war, unlike the Kuru clan which suffered heavy losses. Gandhari’s anger was such that the new 36 year sattra that was likely to be initiated by the Vrishnis after the war was over should collapse at the penultimate hour, thereby wiping out their progeny and rulership. It is not known if the sattra was done by the Vrishnis, but their end came in the 36th year just before the Sun entered Aries with all the planets gathered around it.
The year started in Uttarayana before that time. The 36th year happening to be Pramathi, we have to count backwards by 35 years. That leads us to the year Krodhi! That was the year of the Mahabharata War. The year corresponds to 3136 BCE in the Gregorian date. Thus we have two dates established without doubt of which the date of Kali Yuga continues to form the basis of time in all Vedic and traditional activities.
The date of Kali Yuga: 22nd January 3101 BCE, Year Pramathi, Caitra, Amawasya, Aswini, Thursday with all the planets except Rahu near the beginning of Aries when the tropical vernal equinox coincided with the beginning of sidereal Aries.
The date of the Mahabharata War: 3136 BCE corresponding to the year Krodhi. Further details will be established in the course of this series.
In any research on the date of Mahabharata war, the deduced planetary positions must concur with the year Krodhi and with the corresponding Pancanga details such as tithi, star, karana and month - whichever among them was given in the text of Mahabharata for various events around the time of war. A systematic analysis of such inputs did validate the date of Mahabharata war that the reader can find in the upcoming posts.
[1] Mahabharata: 9-59-21
[2] Mahabharata: 10-16-14
[3] Srimad Bhagavatam: 1-15- 36; 12-2-33
[4] Srimad Bhagavatam: 1-16-10
[5] Srimad Bhagavatam: 1-17
[6] Valmiki Ramayana: 6-35-14
[7] Mahabharata: 3-121
[8] Aryabhatiya: 3-8
[9] Aryabhatiya: 1-3,4
[10] Kali yuga duration of 4,32,000 years is the basic unit in Maha Yuga. Two times the Kali years = Dwapara Yuga. Three times the Kali years = Treta Yuga. Four times of the Kali years = Krita Yuga. So the ratio is 4:3:2:1 from Krita to Kali. In other words Krita = 10 times of Kali years.
[11] Surya Siddhanta: 1-57
[12] Zero ayanamsa refers to the conjunction of the sidereal and tropical equinox at the beginning of Aswini / Aries. As time goes the tropical equinox shifts in the backdrop of the stars giving rise to a gap between the tropical equinox and zero degree Aries position. This gap is known as ayanamsa.
[13]“Chronology of Ancient Hindu History” Part 1, by Pandit Kota Venkatachela Paakayaaji (1957) Page 13-17
[14]The horoscopy illustrations are generated from Jagannatha Hora software, version 7.4
[15] Aryabhatiya: 1-5
[16] Mahabharata: 17-1-20
[17] Mahabharata: 11-25-41
[18] Mahabharata: 16-1-1
[19] Mahabharata: 16-2-2
[20] Mahabharata: 16 -3 –verses 18 & 19
[21] Pancavimsa Brahmana: 25-7-1
[22] Ibid. 25-7-2
[23] Ibid. 25-7-3 & 4
[24] The Sattra is of 4 parts, with nine nine-versed years, nine fifteen versed years, nine seventeen versed years and nine twenty one versed years. (Pancavimsa Brahmana: 25-7-1)
[25] Mahabharata: 2-13
Identifying the calendar of the Mahabharata period (Part 2: Mahabharata date)
The number 36 has a special relevance for the welfare of one’s progeny. A 36-year sacrifice (sattra) was in vogue during Mahabharata times. It is known from Pancavimsa Brahmana that the descendants of Sakti had conducted 36 year sattra.[21] By the mention of Gauriviti as one who did the satttra[22] , Sakti is identified as the father of Parasara whose son was Vyasa.. It is further said in the Brahmana text that the one who performs this sattra gets rulership and also ten strong sons.[23] Without doubt this sattra must have been popular with the Kauravas, the Pandavas and the Vrishinis.
As biological descendants of Vyasa, the Kuru kings could have performed the sattra. Perhaps the Kauravas could not complete the 36 year long sattra[24] or else they could have won the war, retained rulership and children. It is doubtful the Pandavas had completed the sattra in view of the exile they had to undertake. Only the Vrishinis had survived the war and were expected to prosper more in the years after the war. The Vrishnis headed by Krishna were very clever in having chosen to support both the warring sides. Whichever side wins the war, the Vrishnis would bring home the advantages of the winner.
Gandhari’s anger naturally turned towards Krishna who she accused as not having worked enough to avert the slaughter of the Kuru-s. The Kauravas lost their progeny, so did the Pandavas by the time the war ended, but only the Vrishnis survived! The Vrishnis were already known for wealth creation and didn’t mind relocating to newer terrains (Dvaraka) to safeguard their wealth, works and resources.[25] Their clan continued to be intact after the war, unlike the Kuru clan which suffered heavy losses. Gandhari’s anger was such that the new 36 year sattra that was likely to be initiated by the Vrishnis after the war was over should collapse at the penultimate hour, thereby wiping out their progeny and rulership. It is not known if the sattra was done by the Vrishnis, but their end came in the 36th year just before the Sun entered Aries with all the planets gathered around it.
The year started in Uttarayana before that time. The 36th year happening to be Pramathi, we have to count backwards by 35 years. That leads us to the year Krodhi! That was the year of the Mahabharata War. The year corresponds to 3136 BCE in the Gregorian date. Thus we have two dates established without doubt of which the date of Kali Yuga continues to form the basis of time in all Vedic and traditional activities.
The date of Kali Yuga: 22nd January 3101 BCE, Year Pramathi, Caitra, Amawasya, Aswini, Thursday with all the planets except Rahu near the beginning of Aries when the tropical vernal equinox coincided with the beginning of sidereal Aries.
The date of the Mahabharata War: 3136 BCE corresponding to the year Krodhi. Further details will be established in the course of this series.
In any research on the date of Mahabharata war, the deduced planetary positions must concur with the year Krodhi and with the corresponding Pancanga details such as tithi, star, karana and month - whichever among them was given in the text of Mahabharata for various events around the time of war. A systematic analysis of such inputs did validate the date of Mahabharata war that the reader can find in the upcoming posts.
[1] Mahabharata: 9-59-21
[2] Mahabharata: 10-16-14
[3] Srimad Bhagavatam: 1-15- 36; 12-2-33
[4] Srimad Bhagavatam: 1-16-10
[5] Srimad Bhagavatam: 1-17
[6] Valmiki Ramayana: 6-35-14
[7] Mahabharata: 3-121
[8] Aryabhatiya: 3-8
[9] Aryabhatiya: 1-3,4
[10] Kali yuga duration of 4,32,000 years is the basic unit in Maha Yuga. Two times the Kali years = Dwapara Yuga. Three times the Kali years = Treta Yuga. Four times of the Kali years = Krita Yuga. So the ratio is 4:3:2:1 from Krita to Kali. In other words Krita = 10 times of Kali years.
[11] Surya Siddhanta: 1-57
[12] Zero ayanamsa refers to the conjunction of the sidereal and tropical equinox at the beginning of Aswini / Aries. As time goes the tropical equinox shifts in the backdrop of the stars giving rise to a gap between the tropical equinox and zero degree Aries position. This gap is known as ayanamsa.
[13]“Chronology of Ancient Hindu History” Part 1, by Pandit Kota Venkatachela Paakayaaji (1957) Page 13-17
[14]The horoscopy illustrations are generated from Jagannatha Hora software, version 7.4
[15] Aryabhatiya: 1-5
[16] Mahabharata: 17-1-20
[17] Mahabharata: 11-25-41
[18] Mahabharata: 16-1-1
[19] Mahabharata: 16-2-2
[20] Mahabharata: 16 -3 –verses 18 & 19
[21] Pancavimsa Brahmana: 25-7-1
[22] Ibid. 25-7-2
[23] Ibid. 25-7-3 & 4
[24] The Sattra is of 4 parts, with nine nine-versed years, nine fifteen versed years, nine seventeen versed years and nine twenty one versed years. (Pancavimsa Brahmana: 25-7-1)
[25] Mahabharata: 2-13
Calendar is the basis for time computing. We have to first decipher the calendar used by the people of the Mahabharata period. Mahabharata does give a decipherable calendar that was in vogue at that time. Once we are able to decode it, many inputs on time mentioned here and there in Mahabharata do fall in place. The major evidence for the type of calendar is found in the version of Bhishma when he justified the completion of the exile period of the Pandavas.
The Pandavas were expected to complete 13 years in exile. But a few days before that period ended, their identity became known. The gap is only a few days and not more, is known from two verses, one by Karna and another by Draupadi.
The near completion of the exile period was conveyed by Karna, when on hearing the blare of the conch of Arjuna, as Vrihannala in the company of Uttara he stated that Vibhatsu (Arjuna) was engaged in the last eight and five years (13 years) in severe austerities to strike him in combat.[1] The number of days left can be gauged from the reply of Draupadi to Sudeshna, the queen of Virata when asked by her to leave the country upon the death of Kichaka. Draupadi pleaded to bear with her for just thirteen days after which she would leave. [2] This implies that the exile period was going to get over in the next thirteen days.
Within this thirteen day period, emboldened by the absence of Kichaka, the Trigartas started attacking the Matsya country aided by the Kauravas. The Kauravas were pursued by Arjuna in the guise of Vrihannala whose identity was recognized by the Kauravas by the sound of his conch. Thinking that Arjuna was spotted by them before the end of the exile, they asked Bhishma for clarification. Bhishma’s reply helps us to identify the calendar in vogue at that time.
Deciphering the extra days in exile spent by the Pandavas.
Bhishma said that there was an excess of 5 months and 12 days in the 13 years spent by Pandavas in exile.[3] This was calculated on the basis of the 5-Year Yuga system in which for every 2 and half solar years, one lunar month gets increased. To quote the exact words of Bhishma,
“The wheel of time revolves with its divisions, viz., with Kalas and Kasthas and Muhurtas and days and fortnights and months and constellations and planets and seasons and years. In consequence of their fractional excesses and the deviations of also of the heavenly bodies, there is an increase of two months in every five years. It seems to me that calculating this wise, there would be an excess of five months and twelve nights in thirteen years. Everything, therefore, that the sons of Pandu had promised, hath been exactly fulfilled by them. Knowing this to be certain, Vibhatsu hath made his appearance.” (Ganguli’s translation)[4]
From Vedanga Jyothisha it is known that this is about the 5-year Yuga system in which two lunar months increase (Adhika masa) every five years. In ten years 4 months increase and in the next 3 years, 1 month and some days increase. Overall there will be an addition of 5 months and some days. The days are given as “dvādaśa ca kṣapāḥ” in which kṣapāḥ is variously interpreted while the number of days are known as twelve.[5]
When we apply the aphorisms found in Vedanga Jyothisha for the 5-year Yuga, we are able to decode Bhishma’s calculation.
No of solar days in a year = 366[6]
In 5 years (Yuga) = 366 x 5 = 1830
In 13 years = 366 x 13 = 4758
No of lunar days in 5 years (Yuga) = 1830 + 62 = 1892
In 13 years = 4919 days (d), 6 muhurta (m).
The lunar days had far exceeded the solar days. Subtracting the solar days from the lunar days we get the excess days spent by the Pandavas in exile.
Lunar days – Solar days = (4919 d + 6 m) – 4758 d= 161 d + 6 m
Converted into months and muhurtas = (161 d + 6 m) / 30 = 5 months, 11 days, 6 muhurtas
This exactly matches with Bhishma’s version of extra 5 months and “dvādaśa ca kṣapāḥ”, referring to less than 12 days as per the above calculation. Among the many meanings of ‘Kshapa’, ‘night’ was suggested by some. With the calculation coming to more than 11 days but less than 12 days, by having only 6 Muhurtas on the 12th day, Bhishma meant the other meaning, i.e. “diminishing” for Kshapa. This establishes that the Pandavas spent an additional 5 months and less than 12 days in exile. Within the last 13 days (as per Draupadi’s reply to Sudeshna), Arjuna revealed his identity.
Bhishma’s calculation shows it was the 5- year Yuga in use at that time. The earliest reference to this Yuga appears in the 1st Mandala of the Rig Veda on the sage, Dirghatamas. It is stated that the sage grew old (or perished) in the 10th Yuga.[7] This is a reference to the 10th Yuga in his life that works out to the five year period between 45th to 50th years of his life. This sage lived before Ramayana period that is known from the existence of a country by name Anga, ruled by Romapada in Ramayana. Anga got its name from a person Anga who was fathered by Dirghatamas.[8] This is to show that this Yuga system was in vogue in Bhartavarsha from before the Ramayana times. Decipherment of the date of both the Itihasas must comply with the rules of this Yuga system.
Let us begin to do that decipherment to know the exact years within the exile period when the five Adhika months had occurred. The sequence must be known, because of the crucial derivation from Mahabharata that Bhishma, who seemed to be an authority on calculation of time, failed to judge the arrival of Uttarayana and was forced to wait for more than a month in what seems to be a case of Adhika masa! So our next step is to find out whether the extended stay was due to an Adhika masa at that time as a natural sequence or by other causes.
[1] Mahabharata: 4-43-6 https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/mbs/mbs04043.htm
[2] Mahabharata: 4-23-27 https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/mbs/mbs04023.htm
[3] Mahabharata: 4-47-1 to 5 https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/mbs/mbs04047.htm
[4] Mahabharata: 4-52 https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m04/m04052.htm
[5] Mahabharata: 4-47, verses 3-4 http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/mbs/mbs04047.htm
[6] Y-VJ: 28 (“Vedanga Jyothisha by Lagadha” by T.S.Kuppanna Sastry)
[7] Rig Veda: 1- 158 – 6 “dīrghatamā māmateyo jujurvān daśame yughe”.
[8] Vishnu Purana: 4-18
Sunday, December 27, 2020
Deducing the beginning of the 5-year Yuga period in Mahabharata. (Part 3: Mahabharata date)
In the 5-year Yuga concept, the year began on the day of Uttarayana, or the day after the sun turned north. This date is not the exact date of the sun turning to north in all the years of the 5 year Yuga. This is deduced from Lagadha’s Vedanga Jyothisha giving the basic concepts of the 5-year Yuga. The basic concepts are,
(1) The first year started on the day of the conjunction of the sun and the moon. [In Lagadha’s time, this conjunction occurred on Magha Amawasya[1] which means the lunar Phalguna month started the next day, though the solar month continued to be Tapas (Aquarius)]
(2) This conjunction repeated on the 6th year, i.e. after 5 years. By this it is known that the exact date of the Sun turning towards the North was taken as the time of the 1st year. The day (the star) the moon joined this Sun marked the 1st day of the first year of the Yuga.
(3) In the next four years, the same conjunction is not possible on the same star or tithi due to the faster movement of the moon. As a result the star-tithi positions were derived in such a way that they match once again in the 6th year, i.e. the 1st year of the next Yuga.
(4) Within the 5 year period, there are 60 solar months (12 x5) but 62 lunar months. The extra two lunar months are the Adhika Masa-s.
The repetition of the conjunction of the sun and the moon on the 6th year (the 1st year of the Yuga) implies that the sun was at its true position of the winter solstice (Uttarayana) only in the 1st year. In the other four years, the sun could not be at the true Uttarayana degree; nor was the conjunction of the sun and the moon possible in those four years at the true Uttarayana degree.
This revelation is important in deciphering the dates of the events of Mahabharata. Since Bhishma was said to have waited for the sun to turn northward, it is necessary to know in which year he left the world. If the expected Uttarayana day was in a year other than the 1st year, then the true position of the sun at Uttarayana (seen in astronomy simulators) would not yield the correct date of Uttarayana at that time.
In this backdrop two inputs from Vayu Purana must also be remembered. According to Vayu Purana no date has sanctity unless it is connected with the sun and the moon. In this context Vayu Purana refers to Mesha (Aries) and Tula (Libra) as equinox months but identifies the date of equinox only by the position of the sun and the moon in opposition in specific pada of the star. [2]
(This should be an eye-opener to those who are pushing the idea that the Tropical winter solstice on 22nd December must be treated as the Uttarayana day for the current times. Without being touched by the Sun and the moon the day has no sanctity. Makara Sankaranti, now treated as Uttarayana has certain such cosmic connections besides other features which are outside the purview of this series; hence not discussed here)
The second input from Vayu Purana relates to the names of the five years of the Yuga. The five years are named as Samvatsara, Parivatsara, Idvatsara, Anuvatsara and Vatsara.[3] The point to be noted here is that the names Samvatsara and Vatsara are commonly used to refer to the year. If in a context any of these two names appear we must take a re-look at the verse to judge whether this is used to refer to the 1st and the 5th year respectively.
Applying these concepts to Mahabharata, it is found that Bhishma’s version on the upcoming Uttarayana did not match with the first point on the conjunction of the sun and the moon. He expected Uttarayana to start on Shukla Ashtami in the month of Magha when the moon was in Rohini which could happen in any year other than the 1st year of the 5- year Yuga!
This takes us to the task of identifying the first year of the 5- year Yuga closer to Krodhi (the year of the war deduced in Part 1) when the sun and the moon were together in the month of Magha. On checking the combination in jhora astrology simulator for Surya Siddhanta ayanamsa of close to zero ayanamsa of the Mahabharata times, there are twin surprises in Krodhi!
(1) The Adhika masa occurred in Caitra in Krodhi.
(2) And in Krodhi, the Uttarayana started at the conjunction of the Sun and the moon in the star Uttarashadha, which means Krodhi was the 1st year of the 5 year Yuga at that time.
Let us first take up the Adhika Masa in Krodhi. Figure 1 shows the Adhika Caitra in Shobhana (Shobhakrit, the year preceding Krodhi). The previous month was Adhika Masa in the year Krodhi, but the simulator recognizes it with the previous year, i.e. Shobhana, as it is based on the current practice of change of the year with the arrival of Caitra. We should remember that Uttarayana marked the year beginning in the 5 year Yuga. As such, the year Krodhi started from Magha, a month before Caitra. This can be expected to be seen written as the year Shobhana in the simulator.
Figure 1: Adhika Masa in Caitra in the year Krodhi (3137 BCE)
The next month was Nija Caitra which the simulator recognizes in the year Krodhi. (Figure 2)
Figure 2: Nija Caitra in the year Krodhi (3136 BCE)
When we trace the beginning of Uttarayana in Krodhi, the date turns out to be 24th October, 3137 BCE. Interestingly the day shows the conjunction of the sun and the moon at the exact beginning of Capricorn where the 2nd pada of Uttarashadha begins. This conjunction can happen only in the 1st year of the Yuga! (Figure 3)
Figure 3: Uttarayana of Krodhi - the first year of the Yuga
The 1st year of the 5-year Yuga in Mahabharata times started on the first day of the month of Magha (Shukla Pratipat) when the sun and the moon were together in Uttarashadha. The previous day of Amawasya in the month of Pushya was the day the conjunction started, signaling the beginning of Uttarayana. This matches exactly with the zero degree ayanamsa at that time. Only then the winter solstice could start at the junction of Sagittarius and Capricorn with the Sun just having entered Capricorn. The Pandavas returned in this year that happened to be the 1st year of the 5 year Yuga, i.e. Samvatsara year. The war was fought in this year.
The major revelation from this is:
The equinox was forward moving during Mahabharata times. From Magha Shukla Pratipat in Mahabharata, the Uttarayana shifted forward to Magha Amawasya in Lagadha’s time. This proves that the idea of continuous ‘precession’ of the equinoxes is erroneous.
Constructing the Mahabharata calendar from the first year of the Yuga
The relationship between the tithi and the nakshatra of the Uttarayana day is a standard one in the 5 year Yuga, as known from Lagadha’s Vedanga Jyothisha. [4] There are 6 synodic months and 6 tithis in an ayana (1 Yuga = 62 synodic months = 10 ayanas).
So every 7th tithi starting from the 1st ayana of the 1st year (that began in Uttarayana) would give the starting tithi of the subsequent ayana. Similarly every 19th star starting from the star of the first day of Uttarayana (1st ayana) in the 1st year would be the star of the first day of the subsequent ayana.
Using this formula we will be able to construct the tithi- nakshatra of the first day of all the 10 ayanas in the 5 years of Mahabharata times. Let me first derive the 5-year Yuga that started on Uttarashadha of Magha in Krodhi. (Figure 4)
Figure 4: Mahabharata calendar in vogue during the year Krodhi
The Yuga, the 1st year and the Uttarayana of the first year started with the conjunction of the sun and the moon in Uttarashadha. It can be seen that the Uttarayana date did not start on the same day every year, though the sun turned northward in the same star. A researcher in Mahabharata must bear in mind this anomaly in the calendar in vogue at that time. No modern simulator can detect this anomaly, since this Yuga system is not incorporated in any simulator.
The 1st year was Krodhi - the year when the Pandavas ended their exile and the war was fought. At the end of the war, Bhishma waited for the Uttarayana, for his exit from the earth. That was the 2nd year of the Yuga, called Vishvavasu.
As per the above table, the Uttarayana must have started on Shukla Trayodasi in Magha, in the 2nd year of the Yuga when Bhishma was waiting to leave. So Bhishma must have told that he was waiting for Magha Shukla Trayodasi to leave the earth as that was the day of Uttarayana originally. But Bhishma stated that the Uttarayana was going to start on Magha Shukla Ashtami!
Why did Bhishma, an expert in calculating Time, determine the Uttarayana time 4 tithis earlier than the normal course?
How did this discrepancy happen?
[1] Conjunction of the sun and the moon in Sravishtha (R-VJ: 5-6 and Y-VJ: 6-7)
[2] Vayu Purana: 1-50-195 to 198
[3] Vayu Purana: 1-50-183.
Discrepancy in the time of Uttarayana remembered as Ratha Saptami (Part 4: Mahabharata date)
The Uttarayana that Bhishma was waiting for, must have started in Shukla Trayodasi of Magha.
But Bhishma says, “The lunar month of Magha has come. This is, again, the lighted fortnight and a fourth part of it ought by this according to my calculations be over”.[1]
At the face of it, the verse refers to Magha month and three fourth of it. Three fourth of a lunar month is seven and a half tithi (after Saptami / on Ashtami) in Krishna Paksha (waning phase). However by saying further “pakṣo 'yaṃ śuklo bhavitum arhati”, Bhishma had referred to the 7 and a half tithis in Shukla Paksha of Magha (waxing Magha). Bhishma identified the month as ‘Punya Masa’ of Magha. Magha was Punya Masa because the Uttarayana started in that month. Bhishma had made it clear that Uttarayana started after the completion of Saptami in Shukla Paksha of Magha.
An additional verse from Gita Press edition says that Bhishma's exit happened on “Magha Shuddha Ashtami and when the Moon was near Rohini”
Śukla pakśasya cāṣṭamyām māgha māsasya pārthiva
prajāpatye ca nakṣatre madhyam prāpte divākare[2]
The additional information is that the sun was at the middle of Rohini, the star of Prajapati. This means that the sunrise occurred when the star of the day was Rohini (transited by the moon) and half of the star was crossed by the moon by the time of sunrise. This is an essential condition to identify the day Bhishma left the world.
Since Magha Shukla Ashtami offers a definite time limit, the general tendency of researchers is to deduct 58 days from this date to arrive at the first day of the war. It more or less comes to the last day of Kartika month - the month in which Krishna went on a peace mission. Within a fortnight of this mission, the war must have started according to them, which however throws up a lot of improbabilities. But none thought for a moment how and why Bhishma, an adept in calculating the movement of the sun and the moon, miserably failed to judge the arrival of Uttarayana, for which he had to wait for not just a week or a paksha (fortnight) but nearly two months!
Additionally we have now found a discrepancy in the normal sequence of the calendar dates from the 2nd year of the Yuga. How could Shukla Trayodasi slip back to Shukla Ashtami in the following year?
A big mystery is staring at us!!
With this realization, let us proceed step by step in a systematic way.
Now by having known that Bhishma referred to a changed tithi- star position of the Uttarayana, let me produce the changed calendar for Uttarayana of Vishvavasu when Bhishma shed his mortal body. (Figure 1) The Year names and the corresponding Gregorian years are added at extreme right.
Figure 1: The changed calendar since Mahabharata war
Important observations from Figure 1:
- The first row shows the first two ayanas of the 1st year in natural sequence of the calendar until then.
- The 2nd row shows the tithi – nakshatra of the Uttarayana time (of the 2nd year) that Bhishma was waiting for. It ought to have been Shukla Trayodasi in Magha, but it turned out to be Shukla Ashtami – 4 tithis behind.
- The regular 7 tithi difference between one ayana and the next also got disturbed. From Shukla Saptami in the 2nd ayana, it became Shukla Ashtami in the 3rd ayana. This signals the loss of tithis happening after the 2nd ayana (dakshinayana of the 1st year - Krodhi) started. In other words, during the ayana when the war took place, something odd had happened disturbing Time.
Interestingly the star of the day remained the same in the 2nd and in the subsequent years as it used to be in the original calendar. Only the tithi had changed. So something went wrong cosmically to upset the Time denoted by the moon! There was a loss of four tithis as a result!
This implies that Time slipped backwards!
We cannot match the first day of the next Yuga with Krishna Ekadasi of Magha (Fig 1), for that means 19 more tithis (and 22 stars) to go, but then the sun would have moved 20 degrees ahead in Capricorn to be at Shravana and not at the exact Uttarayana degree of northward turning!
The sun at zero degree Capricorn in the first year of the next Yuga is the essential condition to be present. When that condition is fulfilled, the lunar month happened to be the previous month.
One should keep in mind that there was no change in the movement of the sun; the day it turned northward remained undisturbed. The 1st year of the next round of the Yuga would start at the location where the sun turned northward. Figure 1 shows the sun at zero degree Capricorn, but the tithi was different. This means the tithi- lunar month had got disturbed.
So some unexpected cause had changed Time once forever and this change of time coming into use from the time of Magha Shukla Saptami was frozen into memory as Ratha Saptami!
Ratha Saptami, an evidence for the change of Time in Mahabharata
Ratha Saptami marking a change in the direction of the chariot of the Sun God, celebrated even today is proof of the importance attached to this particular day. The sudden change in time resulting in the re-adjustment of Uttarayana on Magha Shukla Saptami was preserved in memory for all times to come by infusing certain practices by way of oblations to the departed on this day. No Mahabharata researcher can afford to ignore the significance of this day waited upon by Bhishma to come out of the distress he was undergoing on the arrow bed. He left the world in the next tithi, i.e. Ashtami. (The new ayana starts from the next tithi)
Further concurrence for this comes from the rules of ‘Ratha Saptami Vrata’ attributed to sage Garga. [3] Ratha Saptami vrata must be observed in Magha when there is “Tithi-dvayam” at sun rise. Tithi-Dvayam means two tithis within two sunrises. The previous tithi must end any time after the sun rise in a day, followed by the next tithi which also ends after the sun rise the next day. For Ratha Saptami Vrata, Shashthi tithi must have ended the previous day, followed by Saptami tithi. This tithi (Saptami) must be present at sunrise the next morning but end up after some time, so that Ashtami would begin in the same day.
Tithi Dvayam is a conditional feature of Ratha Saptami, indicating similar Tithi Dvayam on the day Bhishma left. By its presence at sunrise, Saptami would be the tithi of the day marking the change of direction of the chariot of the sun, but Ashtami should follow sometime soon. This must be present on the day Bhishma left. Additionally Rohini must have been present at sunrise on that day having crossed the 2nd pada or at the end of 2nd pada. The date of Uttarayana should fulfill these two conditions. We will check them as we proceed with the derivations systematically.
The Ratha (of Surya) that Bhishma waited for, to bring peace to him is preserved in tradition as a Homa, known as “Bhishma Ratha Shanti homa”. This is done even today on completion of 70 years of age, though it needs to be ascertained whether this number refers to Bhishma’s age or the number of decades representing the number of tithis he waited after Magha started. Some people mistakenly mention this as Bheema ratha Shanti. The Ratha of Surya was waited upon by Bhishma, not Bheema.
The various austerities related to Bhishma’s departure as seen on Ratha Saptami, Bhishmashtami (when he left the world) and Bhishma Ratha Shanti that continue to be in vogue today are the standing proof of the unexpected change of time of the Uttarayana after the Mahabharata war.
There is another austerity having relevance to Magha Saptami, known as “Mandāra Saptami” vrata done on Magha “Shuddha” Saptamī. [4] This sounds strange because ‘Shuddha’ refers to ‘Nija’ masa in usage. Nija or Shuddha masa is the month following the Adhika Masa. Mandāra means Heaven. Those desiring to go to Heaven should do this vrata which goes on for 13 months starting from Magha shuddha Saptamī says the astrological text. This implies that this vrata is possible only in the year having an Adhika masa. An Adhika masa coming in between two Magha Shukla (waxing) Saptami fulfills the 13 month duration of the vrata. But the reference to Magha “Shuddha” Saptami and “Mandāra” being the fruit of the vrat – something on the lines of what Bhishma achieved, this seems to be connected with Mahabharata time or to have originated from an event of Mahabharata.
The reference “Shuddha” to Magha sounds strange as there can never be a Nija or Shuddha Magha, because Adhika Masa can never occur in the month of Magha!
[1] Mahabharata, 13-167.
[2] Mahabharata: 12-47-3 (Gita Press edition)
[3] “Jothida Varushadhi Nool” (Tamil), Kumaran Padhippagam, Chennai, p. 388
[4] “Jothida Varushadhi Nool” (Tamil) p.381