Quantcast
Channel: Bharatkalyan97
Viewing all 11035 articles
Browse latest View live

Fake Gandhi brings fake crowd, Congress lies. NaMo in UP: Kushinagar (32:59), Deoria (26:54)

$
0
0
Fake Gandhi/Fake Crowds / propaganda--Is Kolkatta same as Varanasi-? That was Didi crowd?


Chaiwallah Vs Establishment: How Modi’s victimhood card can pay off

by 14 mins ago by Sanjay Singh May 10, 2014 14:06 IST

In the past week, Narendra Modi has set a high-risk agenda -- from aggressively taking on regional satraps including some potential post-poll allies, to his neechi jati versus neech rajniti/soch debate, to directly taking on the Election Commission of India, calling the Constitutional body partisan and accusing it of working under political pressure. Whether these moves are well calculated ones or a response to developing situations in the final leg of the elections is debatable, but without a doubt, these have certainly been intended to leave his rivals guessing and to leave one final impression in the minds of voters for greater consolidation among his believers and sympathisers.
]BJP's PM candidate Narendra Modi. PTIBJP's PM candidate Narendra Modi. PTI
The contexts were varied but the central theme was the same, playing the victim, one who was fighting for his rightful position under the sun against the combined might of political dynasties, parties, regional satraps, intellectuals, liberals, secularists and now even the Election Commission.

Will his gambit pay off? That will be known only on May 16 when votes are counted. But the way the Congress party, Mamata Banerjee, Mayawati and liberal secularists have responded to him could be indicative of Modi's success in taking his message to the target audience.

Take for instance the Congress response in the last two days. Sonia Gandhi's speech at a public rally in Kushinagar in UP is particularly interesting. While it was natural for her to defend her children, Rahul and Priyanka, albeit without naming them for their neech soch/rajniti barb against Modi, what was electorally significant was that she subtly tried to drive a wedge in the BJP's upper caste support base. She spoke highly of Atal Behari Vajpayee's prime ministerial values, contrasting him with the "neech soch" (lowly thoughts) of Narendra Modi.

Though she was speaking truth about Vajpayee and the goodwill gestures he extended to leaders of rival political formations including the Nehru-Gandhi family, it's also true that during his term in office for six years, Sonia never had a cordial relationship with Vajpayee.  The fact is that Vajapee's name evokes a certain Brahmanical subtext, which supposedly still has a huge social constituency, and Sonia could thus be attempting to appeal to Brahmins with the idea that they might not be happy with Modi's aggressive backward caste positioning.

Next, the Congress claimed that Modi was not born an OBC but was instead born as a rich upper caste Modh-Ghanchi. It's a different matter though that the Modh-Ghanchis closest north Indian counterpart, the Teli caste, was never bracketed among the upper castes. Modi was a fake OBC, Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil claimed, waving a paper. The BJP countered that it was on July 25, 1994, during the Congress's tenure with Chhabildas Mehta as Chief Minister and Shaktisinh Gohil as a minister in his cabinet, that this caste was placed in the OBC category, after the Mandal categorisation of castes.

The Congress's last ditch attempt to propagate that Modi was not born with the politically significant OBC status could mean that the party is actually wary of his appeal among the numerically preponderant backward castes. Modi retaliated by blaming Sonia for playing politics of unch-neech and untouchability.

Modi's tweet and subsequent drawing of a linkage between his backward caste origin with allegations of despicable thought and politics was  broadly taken as his naked attempt to get into the caste politics of Poorvanchal and Awadh regions of UP, as also for parts of Bihar where polling was to be conducted in the eighth and ninth phases. But there was a very strong subtext to his statements. He was retaliating to Priyanka Gandhi's rather strong statement and it was Modi's way of saying that he would let his challengers go easily, whosoever the person may be. But again he tried to play on the victimhood of a low caste chaiwallah challenger.

Priyanka had hogged the media limelight for her anti-Modi barbs during her campaigning in Raebareli and Amethi. It was thought that she could potentially emerge as one of the principal challengers in times to come. She had to be countered now, a BJP leader said. Same was the case when he chose to make an immediate response to Rahul Gandhi's statement on neech soch by equating that with portions of the CWG scam, toilet paper mein paise kha gaye (ate money even in procuring toilet papers), he said. The language and phrases that he used were to make an instant connect with the audience.

Modi knew that Ram and Ram temple backdrop in his Faizabad rally could not make it emotive. The high voltage early 1990s issue could no longer enthuse people, leave alone make them passionate. Though he talked of Lord Ram, he steered clear of the Ram temple issue.

Thanks to the Varanasi District Magistrate cum Returning Officer and Election Commission's decision not to allow him hold a rally in his own constituency on the final day of campaigning, Modi was able to play the victim card to the hilt and also turn it into an emotive issue. His rivals and sections of analysts may blame him for taking on a constitutional institution but Modi's claim has some merit when Rahul Gandhi, Akhilesh Yadav and Arvind Kejriwal were allowed to campaign in Varanasi the way the liked, while he was denied permission to connect with people.

The sequence of events, as claimed by the BJP leaders, suggests that the party was in touch with the RO since May 5 for permission of Modi's rally in Beniabagh. The party had even deposited the money required, Rs 10,000, in the treasury for booking the ground and on May 7th morning got permission, through order No. 523 - 8 , from the city magistrate to hold that rally there. But then another order by Additional District Magistrate rejected the application for Beniabagh meeting.

In Modi, his rivals are dealing with an unorthodox campaigner who has the gigantic organisational machinery of the Sangh Parivar and buoyant supporters to back. He may appear to be despicable to many, but his conscious projection of a Chaiwallah street fighter image is attractive to a larger number of people. As the campaigning for the last and final phase of polling closes today, the last cards have been played.
http://www.firstpost.com/politics/chaiwallah-vs-establishment-how-modis-victimhood-card-can-pay-off-1516833.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWvJjSmr_Fg#t=762
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=130Vv4BySb8#t=1963

  1. Started on May 10, 2014
    Shri Narendra Modi addressing a Public Meeting in Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh

  2. What has been done about worsening law and order situation in UP: Narendra Modi to UP Govt. and incumbent Kushinagar MP
  3. Law and order is a part of the Ministry where your MP is a Minister. But what is reason law & order situation is worsening: Narendra Modi
  4. Your MP is so close to Madam but you are not bothered about the problems of Kushinagar's farmers: Narendra Modi
  5. Sugar mill is shut but your MP is a Minister what has he done? You cannot elect someone who is not concerned about your future: Modi ji
  6. I was suppose to go to Ghosi but we received sad news that our Party leader passed away. I bow to him & condolences to the family: Modi ji
  7. Narendra Modi is speaking in Kushinagar. Watch http://www.narendramodi.in/liveevent/social/index.html 
  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThgRQ3_IAUc#t=1130 

    Shri Narendra Modi addressing a Public Meeting in Robertsganj


'No rift within poll panel' -- CEC VS Sampath (3:18)

$
0
0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty6MbNSBViU

'No rift within poll panel'


Published on May 10, 2014
Download Times Now India's Election HQ - Real time election coverage at your fingertips.

The Chief Election Commissioner on Saturday (May 10) denied there beng a rift within the poll panel. Issuing a statement, the CEC said,"EC Brahma was part of all decisions including on
Varanasi. The CEC also added, " All decisions of the poll panel were unanimous"

SoniaG's name suggested for Guinness record by subramanya swamy

20 Questions to Arvind Kejriwal from 8 AAP founder members -- Manushi. AAP is ANP, Anti-National Party

$
0
0
Questions to Arvind Kejriwal from AAP Colleagues





8 National Council and Founder Members, Aam Aadmi Party Seeking Answers


  1. Why had you gone to Germany for 15 days on a Congress financed trip with a Congress leader? In spite of opposition from the party (AAP), on whose request did you make a Congress leader as the Delhi Pradesh Convenor?
  2. On whose orders did you give the Lok Sabha ticket from Hissar to Yudhvir Singh, the corrupt civil servant who gave a clean chit to Robert Vadra? This, when the honest Ashok Khemka had nullified Vadra’s land deals?
  3. On whose orders did you announce Yogendra Yadav, close confidant of the Congress and the man responsible for sending Anna Hazare to Tihar Jail, as the Chief Ministerial candidate from Haryana inspite of opposition from inside the party?
  4. You claim that you had the papers relating to the Rs. 400 crore Delhi Jal Board corruption scandal since 2005; then why did you not file a case against Congress leader Sheila Dixit in 2006 itself? Why, instead did you hand over those documents to a senior Congress leader?
  5. What are the reasons for your silence against Congress MP Naveen Jindal (Coal scam) and G M Rao (GMR airport scam)? Who has taken the responsibility of paying Rs 25,000 to 700 full time workers?
  6. Even though AAP had decided not to split votes of those opposed to corruption and power brokers as that would benefit the Congress, who did you have a deal with after which you decided to contest more than 400 seats ?
  7. Will you support Rahul Gandhi at the Centre after the parliamentary elections? In return, the Congress will make you the CM of Delhi and Yogendra Yadav as the CM of Haryana?
  8. Why have you given Lok Sabha tickets to Raza MuzaffarBhat and Babu Matthew – the people who described Ajmal Kasab, Afzal Guru and Yaseen Bhatkal as innocent? Why don’t you condemn terrorist attacks on innocent citizens and security forces?
  9. SoniSori, Kamal Mitra Chenoy and Binayak Sen are known Maoist sympathizers. Why have you given a Lok Sabha ticket to Soni Sori? Why have you never condemned the Maoist attacks on civilians and security forces?
  10. Why did you force Anna Hazare to go on a fast at Ram Lila Maidan without a backdrop of Bharat Mata? Why are you taking the support of controversial religious leaders like Pramod Krishnan and Taukir Raza? In the Okhla constituency, you have described the Batla House encounter as staged and in Dwarka you pay tributes to martyr Mohan Chand Sharma? InHinduareas your cap has a Hindi script and in Muslim areas the cap has the Urdu script. Why are you playing the politics of communalism?
  11. Yogendra Yadav becomes ‘yaduvanshi’ in Hindu majority areas and in Muslim majority areas, he calls himself Saleem. Why are Yogendra Yadav, Ashutosh and other leaders indulging in casteist and communal vote bank politics?
  12. Why did you gift Rs. 400 crores to Anil Ambani’s company when you were the Chief Minister of Delhi? How many shares does Ashutosh have in the Anil Ambani’s  company? Did he buy those shares or was he gifted those shares?
  13. How did Manish Sisodia get Rs. 44 lakhs in 2005 and Rs 32 lakhs in 2006 from the Ford Foundation when his NGO Kabeer was registered in November 2007? For what reason are the Ford Foundation’s head Kavita Ramdas’ father Lakshmi Ramdas, mother Lalita Ramdas and sister Sagari Ramdas on the AAP central policy making committees?
  14. How much funds in direct and indirect form have Manish Sisodia, Yogendra Yadav, MedhaPatkar, Meera Sanyal and the party taken from the Ford foundation, America and other countries? How many foreign visits have you, Manish Sosodia, Yogendra Yadav and Medha Patkar made till date? Why have you kept the details of such visits confidential?
  15. During your 49 day tenure as the CM why did you not start a CBI or judicial probe against Ford Foundation, or American or NGOs or people of other countries who do not file their returns? A Home Ministry report says that NGO’s received Rs. 11,500 crores as foreign aid in 2013 and in the last 5 years they have received Rs. 42 thousand crores and while only 2 percent NGO’s file their returns.
  16. Why did you deliberately choose the illegal and unconstitutional method of bringing the Janlokpal Bill? Why did you not try to strengthen the already available Lok Ayukt bill in Delhi? Why did you resign from the post of CM without conducting a referendum for the same?
  17. Why did you not demand a judicial or CBI probe of the death of Santosh Koli? Throughout the election campaign, you alleged that Koli’s death was caused by the Maoists.  Where is Santosh Koli’s post mortem report?
  18. Why did you ask for election nomination forms from ordinary people whereas the decision to field candidates for most Lok Sabha seats had already been made or sold to the highest bidder?
  19. Why were corrupt officials like Yogesh Dahiya from Saharanpur and Yudhvir Singh from Hissar given tickets from AAP? Why were corrupt / guilty politicians like Sabir Rahi from Bulandshahar and Narendra Mohanty from Kandhamal given tickets?
  20. Why is the National Council not been called to solve the internal problems of the party? Why has the ‘high command’ culture not removed from the party? Why is there no internal democracy in the party? Why has the Aam Aadmi party become the Sanjay Aadmi Party (SAP) in Utta Pradesh, the Manish Aadmi Party (MAP) in Madhya Pradesh, the Yogendra Aadmi Party (YAP) in Haryana, Mayank Aadmi Party (MAP) in Maharashtra, the Parveen Amanullah Party (PAP) in Bihar and the Kristina Aadmi Party (KAP) in Tamil Nadu?
Ashwini Upadhyaya, Rajesh Gupta, Ramesh Yadav, Salil Kumar, Omji, Kuldeep Janghu,
Subhash
 Talwar,
Sanjay Brahmachari:
National Council and Founder Members, Aam Aadmi Party.
  1. Why had you gone to Germany for 15 days on a Congress financed trip with a Congress leader? In spite of opposition from the party (AAP), on whose request did you make a Congress leader as the Delhi Pradesh Convenor?
  2. On whose orders did you give the Lok Sabha ticket from Hissar to Yudhvir Singh, the corrupt civil servant who gave a clean chit to Robert Vadra? This, when the honest Ashok Khemka had nullified Vadra’s land deals?
  3. On whose orders did you announce Yogendra Yadav, close confidant of the Congress and the man responsible for sending Anna Hazare to Tihar Jail, as the Chief Ministerial candidate from Haryana inspite of opposition from inside the party?
  4. You claim that you had the papers relating to the Rs. 400 crore Delhi Jal Board corruption scandal since 2005; then why did you not file a case against Congress leader Sheila Dixit in 2006 itself? Why, instead did you hand over those documents to a senior Congress leader?
  5. What are the reasons for your silence against Congress MP Naveen Jindal (Coal scam) and G M Rao (GMR airport scam)? Who has taken the responsibility of paying Rs 25,000 to 700 full time workers?
  6. Even though AAP had decided not to split votes of those opposed to corruption and power brokers as that would benefit the Congress, who did you have a deal with after which you decided to contest more than 400 seats ?
  7. Will you support Rahul Gandhi at the Centre after the parliamentary elections? In return, the Congress will make you the CM of Delhi and Yogendra Yadav as the CM of Haryana?
  8. Why have you given Lok Sabha tickets to Raza MuzaffarBhat and Babu Matthew – the people who described Ajmal Kasab, Afzal Guru and Yaseen Bhatkal as innocent? Why don’t you condemn terrorist attacks on innocent citizens and security forces?
  9. SoniSori, Kamal Mitra Chenoy and Binayak Sen are known Maoist sympathizers. Why have you given a Lok Sabha ticket to Soni Sori? Why have you never condemned the Maoist attacks on civilians and security forces?
  10. Why did you force Anna Hazare to go on a fast at Ram Lila Maidan without a backdrop of Bharat Mata? Why are you taking the support of controversial religious leaders like Pramod Krishnan and Taukir Raza? In the Okhla constituency, you have described the Batla House encounter as staged and in Dwarka you pay tributes to martyr Mohan Chand Sharma? InHinduareas your cap has a Hindi script and in Muslim areas the cap has the Urdu script. Why are you playing the politics of communalism?
  11. Yogendra Yadav becomes ‘yaduvanshi’ in Hindu majority areas and in Muslim majority areas, he calls himself Saleem. Why are Yogendra Yadav, Ashutosh and other leaders indulging in casteist and communal vote bank politics?
  12. Why did you gift Rs. 400 crores to Anil Ambani’s company when you were the Chief Minister of Delhi? How many shares does Ashutosh have in the Anil Ambani’s  company? Did he buy those shares or was he gifted those shares?
  13. How did Manish Sisodia get Rs. 44 lakhs in 2005 and Rs 32 lakhs in 2006 from the Ford Foundation when his NGO Kabeer was registered in November 2007? For what reason are the Ford Foundation’s head Kavita Ramdas’ father Lakshmi Ramdas, mother Lalita Ramdas and sister Sagari Ramdas on the AAP central policy making committees?
  14. How much funds in direct and indirect form have Manish Sisodia, Yogendra Yadav, MedhaPatkar, Meera Sanyal and the party taken from the Ford foundation, America and other countries? How many foreign visits have you, Manish Sosodia, Yogendra Yadav and Medha Patkar made till date? Why have you kept the details of such visits confidential?
  15. During your 49 day tenure as the CM why did you not start a CBI or judicial probe against Ford Foundation, or American or NGOs or people of other countries who do not file their returns? A Home Ministry report says that NGO’s received Rs. 11,500 crores as foreign aid in 2013 and in the last 5 years they have received Rs. 42 thousand crores and while only 2 percent NGO’s file their returns.
  16. Why did you deliberately choose the illegal and unconstitutional method of bringing the Janlokpal Bill? Why did you not try to strengthen the already available Lok Ayukt bill in Delhi? Why did you resign from the post of CM without conducting a referendum for the same?
  17. Why did you not demand a judicial or CBI probe of the death of Santosh Koli? Throughout the election campaign, you alleged that Koli’s death was caused by the Maoists.  Where is Santosh Koli’s post mortem report?
  18. Why did you ask for election nomination forms from ordinary people whereas the decision to field candidates for most Lok Sabha seats had already been made or sold to the highest bidder?
  19. Why were corrupt officials like Yogesh Dahiya from Saharanpur and Yudhvir Singh from Hissar given tickets from AAP? Why were corrupt / guilty politicians like Sabir Rahi from Bulandshahar and Narendra Mohanty from Kandhamal given tickets?
  20. Why is the National Council not been called to solve the internal problems of the party? Why has the ‘high command’ culture not removed from the party? Why is there no internal democracy in the party? Why has the Aam Aadmi party become the Sanjay Aadmi Party (SAP) in Utta Pradesh, the Manish Aadmi Party (MAP) in Madhya Pradesh, the Yogendra Aadmi Party (YAP) in Haryana, Mayank Aadmi Party (MAP) in Maharashtra, the Parveen Amanullah Party (PAP) in Bihar and the Kristina Aadmi Party (KAP) in Tamil Nadu?
Ashwini Upadhyaya, Rajesh Gupta, Ramesh Yadav, Salil Kumar, Omji, Kuldeep Janghu,
Subhash
 Talwar,
Sanjay Brahmachari:
National Council and Founder Members, Aam Aadmi Party.
http://www.manushi.in/articles.php?articleId=1776#.U24qo4GSySr

Cultural Difference as Epistemic Difference -- Prakash Shah reviews to books of SN Balagangadhara

$
0
0
Cultural Difference as Epistemic Difference
A Review of Two Books by S.N. Balagangadhara
Author(s) : Prakash Shah
“The Heathen in his Blindness”: Asia, the West and the Dynamic of Religion.
S.N. Balagangadhara 2nded.
Manohar, New Delhi, 2005 (1994), pp. xii + 503, Rs. 595.00

Reconceptualizing India Studies
S.N. Balagangadhara
Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2012, pp. ix + 270, Rs. 750.00

Balagangadhara’s primary target is the unpacking of the ‘how’ of knowledge production consequent to the interaction between India and the West over the last few centuries. However, the range and implications of his work are far wider and yet hardly exploited for their potential. Much of The Heathenand Reconceptualizing, as well as his other writing, are devoted to uncovering how the West produces knowledge of the world in general and about India in particular. This has disappointed those who have not understood his work or prematurely expected to find more knowledge about India. 

My own exposure to its reception indicates that Western scholars, outside of his own research programme at the University of Ghent, in Belgium, have almost unanimously ignored his work, even if they pretend to have a passing acquaintance with it. It may well be the case, as Balagangadhara himself indicates inReconceptualizing, that India is where most of the energy required to extend the programme will be found and, indeed, that it is Asian scholars who will be asking new questions about human beings in the coming century.

Balagangadhara is unapologetic about dissecting how the West experiences the world. His argument is that this task is necessary in order to clear the ground before the contribution of Indian culture can be assessed. It is made necessary because, over the last few hundred years, systems of knowledge worldwide, certainly in academic contexts, have been dominated by questions that Europe has asked of itself and about the rest of the world. This particular way of asking questions means that it has not asked questions in other ways. The conditions for this way of inquiring about the world are shaped and constrained by the Western culture. Such constrained inquiring has spread worldwide, with intellectuals from other parts of the world having adopted a way of asking questions the West considers appropriate. Whether adopted by Western or non-Western intellectuals, who parasitically formulate problems according to it, that way is tied to Western culture. So, for example, questions asked about India, by both Western and Indian intellectuals, are framed by how the Western culture looks at the world. Only if that process is understood, by first generating theories about Western culture, can the ground be cleared to discover how Indians could ask different questions about the world, thus leading to an understanding of what Indian culture is and what its contribution to the world may be. Balagangadhara’s work explicitly notices and establishes how little we have understood Western culture. Just because Indians speak a Western language does not mean that they understand what Western culture is.
A central part of Balagangadhara’s research programme, reflected in the books under review, is devoted to developing how a comparative science of cultures can be conceived of. For him, a culture is how a particular social group, as it goes about in the world, generates a process of learning as well as a process of learning to learn (meta-learning). While other such processes may be present in a particular culture, what distinguishes and gives shape to a culture are the ways of learning and meta-learning that dominate and crystallise to structure its way of going about in the world. Conversely, these learning processes dovetail into teaching processes so that they can be transmitted to future generations. The structuring of processes of learning and teaching, leading to configurations of learning, occurs and stabilizes over a period of centuries, and cultural differences are tied to these configurations of learning. As The Heathen discusses, for the West, religion lends structure to its way of going about in the world.Religion generates the dominance of theoretical knowledge and it creates a way of going-about predominantly guided by knowing-about. For Indian culture, ritual lends identity to its configuration of learning, this culture imparts practical knowledge, and performative knowledge dominates there.

In Reconceptualizing, Balagangadhara defends the use of ‘culture’ in the sense of a configuration of learning for a comparative science of cultures. In doing so, he dismisses some standard objections to its use as articulated in anthropological theorizing, and he enables us to see how a derivative instance of it proves useful. Elaborating on what it means to be ‘cultural’, he shows how this adjectival use allows us to individuate culture when considering how a person uses the resources of his socialization. Important for comparative studies is Balagangadhara’s question regarding the work that cultural differences do. In other words: what kind of difference is cultural difference and what difference does it make? “Some difference between individuals is a cultural difference if it entails a specific way of using the resources of socialization.” This deceptively simple formulation carries enormous potential because it allows Balagangadhara to isolate what is a cultural as opposed to a psychological or social difference in any set of anthropological accounts. In Reconceptualizing, this provides the opening for Balagangadhara to embark on a series of case studies evaluating how the encounter between Western and Indian culture tells us something important about both.Produced nearly two decades earlier, The Heathen is a sustained meditation on the same
question but studied through the problem of religion and, specifically, the claim that religion is a cultural universal. The Heathen furnishes a major set of insights, yet to be exploited by the academic world. Considering that Balagangadhara has sustained a research programme despite the context of Western dominance, with its in-built proclivities for dismissing certain kinds of questions as being unimportant, this should not be that surprising. Yet Balagangadhara has identified key components of Western culture through his study of religion and has been able to demonstrate their importance in structuring the Western experience of the world. The Heathen is where we find the basis of the argument that there is a discontinuity of epistemology between Western and the pagan cultures of Greece, Rome and India. It is the kind of epistemological discontinuity that depends on very different configurations of learning. InThe Heathen we find an explanation for why accounts generated about other cultures by the West cannot provide a factual description of those cultures. This is also where we find substantiated why Western culture finds it necessary to think of other cultures as being its variants. This is where we find the basis for the claim that India is a corrupt culture, which is where the variation bites. All themes find further elaboration and deepening in Reconceptualizing.

The key is religion. Religion is an explanatory intelligible account of itself and the cosmos. As such religion fuses a causal and an intentional account. The reason why the universe came about is because God intended it to be so. The reason why religion came about lies in the same source: God’s intention. Judaism, Christianity and Islam share such a claim, which is why they are the only instances of religion we have. They are also the best instance of what a worldview is; it seems that only religions have worldviews. Multiple things follow from Balagangadhara’s identification of the West as a culture constituted by religion. Having religion means that other cultures are also seen as having rival religions, whether or not they have religion at all. It is the fulfilment of a theological claim in Christianity that all cultures have religion. As the West explored, colonized and expanded, religions were found elsewhere. This did not depend on empirical investigation; Westerners found what they already expected to find. The dominant configuration of learning to which religion gave rise meant that evidence to the contrary was suppressed. No society was permitted to be without religion, although different kinds of religion could be admitted. When Westerners accumulated evidence about India, the heathenism their theology spoke of Indians practising was further developed into the different religions of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. This claim has now been secularized because this is also what the social sciences tell today us about India. This is but one instance of theological claims having become the ‘facts’ of contemporary theories.

In this way religions were ‘constructed’ in India and other parts of the pagan world. But what is the ontological status of such constructions? This is where we can start to unpack the epistemological discontinuities between the West and pagan cultures. If members of one culture consistently claim that another culture has religion, namely, Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism, does that give rise to the existence of religions in that culture? Prior to contact with the Semitic religions, Indian culture possesses neither explanatory intelligible accounts nor worldviews. The multiplicity and inconsistency of stories of ‘creation’ in Indian culture is testament to that. How does the experience of one culture, the West, which says that another culture, the Indian, which the former experiences as having religion somehow endow Indians with religion? Balagangadhara tackles this basic problem by showing that while the West must experience other cultures as having religion, because that is entailed by how the West structures its experience of them, it does not follow that those cultures are somehow endowed with it. He saves our experience of Asian cultures as having religion by showing why we need to think that, even though it is not so. This is fatal to the claims of those who proclaim the existence of Hinduism. It also undermines the claim of those who might accept that there was nothing like Hinduism prior to colonialism, but still insist that there is something like that now. Those Indian writers and Indophilic Westerners, who say that Hinduism always existed, perhaps in the form of dharma, also have a problem because they need to show how dharma is identical with an entity imagined by the West. These claims about Hinduism are hallucinatory because they require that the imagination of one culture have the effect of constituting religion in another. Many Indians, including those in the diaspora today,talk as though Hinduism exists and is a religion, but they do not know what this means to Westerners.

Constructing religions in Asia is merely a part of what Orientalism is. As Balagangadhara elaborates inReconceptualizing, Orientalism is the structuring in the experience of one culture, the West, of the Orient, which is the experiential entity. As such, while it may be full of rich and elaborate accounts, it is also an imaginative and structuring exercise on the part of the West. It tells us something about how the Western culture structures its experience. This is how Balagangadhara offers a re-reading of Said’sOrientalism, observing that Said provides an Archimedean point from which to reorient the way the world appears to a former colonial because it makes the familiar unfamiliar. It forces us to reckon with the realization that Orientalist accounts do not provide a factual description of Oriental societies and cultures at all, but a representation of how the West brings together certain phenomena, according to how it structures its experience of the world. Just as the Western accounts brought unrelated items and put them together to constitute something now known as Hinduism, so the West has performed a similar operation with so many other dimensions of knowledge. Differing from Said, however, Balagangadhara argues that the social sciences as currently practiced cannot correct Orientalism by the furnishing of new evidence as they are completely tied to Orientalism, just as Orientalism is supported by the social sciences. It cannot be corrected by adducing factual evidence because the basis of its structuring enterprise lies elsewhere. Decorating Orientalism more elaborately therefore does not disrupt its basic structure. According to the same logic, doing better studies of Hinduism will not disrupt the imaginative entity that it is; they will simply decorate it.
An important dimension of this structuring process takes us back to the religion that Christianity is. It lends identity to the Western culture and acts as its root model of order. The explanatory intelligible account which religion is acts as the model of learning and thus teaches that humans are intentional beings and that beliefs lie behind human practices. In The Heathen, Balagangadhara locates this manoeuvre in Christianity’s early encounter with the Roman pagan milieu in which it found itself, when it had to defend itself against pagan criticism. Christianity, it was said, was novel, and not like the ancestral practices of the pagan traditions, which went back to the ancient past. Christians responded by claiming that their doctrines were ancient, representing a move by religion against tradition which has played a crucial role ever since. In so defending themselves, Christians had transformed the pagan question regarding tradition completely. The pagans argued on the basis of the antiquity of theirpractices. Christian took a stand on the antiquity of their doctrines on which, they claimed, their practices were based. The reference for religio, which for pagans was traditio, was thereby transformed by Christians. Belief and doctrine dominates, explains and justifies practices, a way of knowing about human beings that expanded and became rooted as Christianity did.

It is important to observe here that religion requires practices to be justified, founded and defended by reference to doctrines. The ancient pagan traditions and the Indian traditions that Christians encountered did not justify or ground practices in that way. Behind their traditions lay ancestral practices. They were part of ordinary human knowledge passed on from generation to generation, naturally changing in the process. This could refer to knowledge of a slice of the world. They did not claim the kind of knowledge that religion did, which was not ordinary human knowledge at all, but the truth revealed by God. Because it presented itself as God’s revelation, religion could also claim to possess an all-encompassing view of the world, rather than partial knowledge of slices of the world.When cultures that have religion speak of human practices they refer to something different from those who do not have religion. Again, there is a discontinuity. Given that descriptions about human practices are framed around the configuration of learning of a religious culture, an asymmetrical relationship between Western and Indian cultures arises. The Heathen goes on to show that when Christians encountered India, they also sought foundations for Indian practices in their doctrines. They sought out the content of Indian beliefs in their scriptures. A study of these lay behind the identification of the different religions, which sprang out of the earlier framework which had merely told of the heathenism and rank idolatry of the Indians. Paying attention to the scriptures allowed the identification of Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism as distinct, albeit false religions. Hinduism in particular became identified as the false religion of India. Brahmins got identified as the ‘priests’ of this religion. They kept people in ignorance of the true religion, which the Indians once had. Christian theology had said that all peoples were given the revelation; the Vedas were the Indian version. Brahmins corrupted it by fooling people into following idolatrous practices. These involved worshipping Satan and his minions, the false gods of Hinduism. Not worshipping the true God, but the devil, is what made Hinduism a false religion.
Christians also had another problem with the Brahmins. Hinduism was a corrupt religion and the Brahmins, its false priests. They were also identified as preventing people from converting to Christianity. The caste system, believed to have been instituted by the Brahmins, was part of the problem. That system only served to underline the corruption of Indian society and culture, even though this corruption was not to do with any socio-economic assessment of caste, which was never made. To be sure Indians identify with jatis until today. However, as indicated in Reconceptualizing, it remains a mystery what made the caste system into a system and what kept such a system in place. Alongside these mysteries, however, there is also the conviction in the West, and shared by many an Indian since the colonial period, that such a thing as the caste system exists, it is an evil, and it underlines the corrupt social structure of Indian society, such that the immoral practice of caste discrimination is made obligatory. From this framework sprang explanations of the necessity of Buddhism, which was a protest against Hinduism and its caste system. In The Heathen, Balagangadhara shows how this could not have been the case as dialogues attributed to the Buddha concerning the nature of Brahminhood point to how ‘caste’ was presupposed in them as part of the background framework. Still the protest version of Buddhism is the frame according to which it is widely understood. This applies equally to the variousbhakti movements, which tend to be viewed as protest movements of one sort or another against ‘Brahmanism’. This again underscores how accounts infused with Christian theological assumptions have gained widespread currency in the social sciences and elsewhere.

At various points so far, we have had occasion to notice that much of the Orientalist account of Indian society was and is accepted by Indians. This is often proclaimed as evidence of the continuity between Western and Indian cultures. There is no rupture of understanding and, where the Orientalist or colonial accounts have been wrong, as post-colonial scholars tend to claim, facts need to be supplied to correct them. However, we have also noticed that theological assumptions are part and parcel of Orientalism as well as theorizing in the social sciences. The Christian-Orientalist story about non-Western cultures on its own was never actually convincing on cognitive grounds. For instance, both The Heathen andReconceptualizing show how Christian accounts of Indian society were often resisted by Indian interlocutors who argued, from within their framework, that it was not necessary for them to accept the Christian story or to convert. That religion suited Westerners just as the Indian traditions suited Indians. At some point, however, the Christian-Orientalist account did become acceptable to Indian intellectuals. They accepted the terms on which Westerners described their societies, including accounts of its backwardness, its corruption, its deficient religions, its caste system, and so on. This phenomenon extends to intellectuals of independent India. How can we explain this? 

To do so, Balagangadhara deploys the concept of ‘colonial consciousness’ in Reconceptualizing. This refers to the effect of colonialism upon the colonized. He shows that colonialism is not just a political and economic enterprise, but also an educational project. Colonialism forces the colonized to accept the Western experience of his culture as his own. It is not convincing on rational or cognitive grounds, so the Western experience is made acceptable to the colonized by force or violence. This is why the colonial project is an educational project and why it succeeds to the extent that it survives formal decolonization. The colonial regime’s attempted substitution of the colonizer’s experience for that of the colonized, using violence, also makes it an immoral project. 

However, although the colonized accepts the colonizer’s experience as his own, neither his own experience of the world nor that of the colonizer is truly accessible to him. Indian and Western culture are both alien to him. Balagangadhara exhorts Indians to first accept the fact of being colonized in this sense rather than jumping to ‘explain’, in distorted ways, the nature of Indian culture. Indians have to mount a critique of colonial consciousness before they can move to the next level. Simply mimicking the West, as post-colonials might argue for, is also immoral because it accepts, justifies and celebrates what the colonizer said: that the colonized is untrustworthy. Mimicry merely underwrites the inauthenticity of the colonized.

The asymmetrical relationship between the Indian and Western cultures, already noted above, is concretized further in Reconceptualizing through a series of case studies from contemporary descriptions of Indian culture. These accounts also speak of dialogues in the context of asymmetry and violence. The kinds of violence spoken of are exemplified in the psychoanalytical accounts given in books by American academics, Courtright on Ganesha and Kripal on Ramakrishna. The violence ascribed to such books is considered psychic in nature because it surfaces in dialogical moves within asymmetrical conditions. On the surface, the accounts provided by the writers portray their subjects as exhibiting some sort of repressed sexuality. It also provokes reactions in terms of threats of or actual violence and criticism on the part of Hindutvavadins and also among a wider range of Hindus. They feel there is something wrong in the accounts provided by the authors but, at the same time, are forced into a position of having to come up with rival theories to account for why the authors are wrong to write in the way they do. That Courtright’s and Kripal’s accounts of their subjects are based on the ad hoc attribution of certain psychological states is easily demonstrated by Balagangadhara. But he goes further to explain why the kind of dialogical moves they engage in silence Hindus even as they are provoked into outrage. He shows that the argumentation involves a number of moves that also prove why the burden on the Hindus is asymmetrical. The authors attribute implicit premises to the Hindus; these attributed premises are transformed into explanatory schemes of which the scholar assumes the truth; the explanations also place the phenomena discussed within a structure; the Hindus are logically compelled to defend the moves by the scholars. In such dialogical manoeuvres lie a number of unproven assumptions of which the protagonist does not have to demonstrate the truth, thus underwriting the skewed nature of the dialogue. Yet the Hindus are forced to take a pre-dialogical position by having to take stand on the explanatory adequacy of the psychoanalytical theories. In such contexts, dialogues may not be antidotes to violence; in asymmetrical situations, they may actually provoke it.

There is much more in both books which cannot be shared here because of the constraints of a review. Balagangadhara discusses the twin dynamic of Christianity of proselytization and secularization; how the West remains a religious culture; how the secular state may provoke religious conflict in a predominantly pagan milieu like India; how Indians lack normative thinking; and how the criterion of reasonableness in normative political theory is only accessible to those who share a common Western history. The Heathen told us how a comparative science of cultures would look like by plotting the differences between the Western and an Asian culture, the Indian. Reconceptualizing takes that agenda further through a number of contemporary problems on which further light is shed when they are recast as part of a larger comparative science of cultures. The promise of the first is partly fulfilled in the second, but much more clearly remains to be done. The books under review should constitute a serious challenge, but they are also an inspiration. One hopes that Asian scholars are listening. 

Prakash Shah
GLOCUL: Centre for Culture and Law, Queen Mary, University of London

http://www.manushi.in/articles.php?articleId=1764&ptype=#.U24uK4GSySo

Two iron men of destiny -- Sri Narendra Modi as Prime Minister and Dr. Subramanian Swamy as Finance Minister -- V. Sundaram IAS (R)

$
0
0
This is an extraordinary epistle rendered at the feet of Mother India by Shri V. Sundaram, by my good friend. 

I have taken the liberty of adding a captioned picture in Hindi which captures the quintessence of Sundaram's eloquence and passionate patriotism. राष्ट्र जिनके लिये सर्वोपरि उनके नेतृत्व पे हमे विश्वास  For whom the nation is supreme, whose leadership we trust.

In moments of crisis, divine intervention takes a variety of forms. I think this is a moment of truth for the Indian nation's destined role in world polity -- a day when the poll campaign has ended -- that the Indian voters will choose to entrust the responsibility of serving this great nation to a team led by two great men: Shri Narendra Modi and Dr. Subramanian Swamy.

Congratulations, Sundaram, you have produced a gem of an account which should make every Indian proud.

Shri NaMo, Dr. Swamy, jeevema s'aradah s'atam. The nation needs you, NOW.

Dhanyosmi.

Kalyanaraman

TWO IRON MEN OF DESTINY –
SRI NAENDRA MODI AS PRIME MINISTER AND DR.SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY AS FINANCE MINISTER

V SUNDARAM – IAS (R)

In June 2013, I wrote as follows :

“Our great and ancient nation has been brought to the verge of total collapse and irretrievable ruin by the manoeuvres, machinations and manipulations of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi and her Congress Party of marauders, looters and carpetbaggers. We have a shameless and spineless Prime Minister, a corrupt, shameless and spineless Finance Minister. We have a listless and lifeless Home Minister. The rest of the Union Council of Ministers are in the abject thraldom of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi who controls the purse strings of the Sonia Congress Party --- a Party which functions on a 24*7 basis for the survival of Pakistan and the total extinction of Bharat Varsha. In this desperate situation the only hope for our Country lies in throwing out the Sonia Congress Gang in the forthcoming 2014 Lok Sabha Elections. All of us should work together for ensuring the magnificent victory of BJP and its allies in the 2014 Lok Sabha Elections’’.

IN A FEW DAYS FROM TODAY,  BY THE EVENING OF 16TH OF MAY 2014 TO BE EXACT, THE NDA IS GOING TO WIN MORE THAN 300 SEATS IN THE LOK SABHA POLLS 2014. NARENDRA MODI WILL BE TAKING OVER AS THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA. IT WILL BE GREAT FOR OUR BHART VARSHA TO HAVE A GREAT ECONOMIST AND STATESMAN OF THE EMINENCE  OF DR.SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY AS THE FINANCE MINISTER OF INDIA.

    “Millions and millions in India have welcomed the appointment of Shri Narendra Modi as the Chairman of BJP’s 2014 Lok Sabha Election Campaign Committee. The BJP top leadership should immediately announce the following two decisions in order to usher in NDA Rule in New Delhi next year in 2014:

One, to induct Dr Subramanian Swamy into the BJP Party. This will have a tonic effect on the morale of hundreds of thousands of educated youth --- men and women --- throughout the country. The Internet World would get radically transformed with a new upsurge of vigour and vitality, making them all to unite and work in a determined manner to ensure a magnificent victory for the NDA in general and BJP in particular, in the 2014 Lok Sabha Elections.

Two, to bring in to the fold of BJP stalwart leaders like Yeddiyurappa in Karnataka, Raman Pillai in Kerala and many other veterans who for various reasons had left the BJP during the last several years. BJP Central Leadership should understand that they are pitted against a singularly unscrupulous, supremely corrupt and viciously cruel Sonia Congress Party headed by an international political gangster from Italy. She is the Fountainhead and in fact the major beneficiary of all the major public scams like the 2G Spectrum Scam, Commonwealth Games Scam, Coal Block Scam etc.  If she has to be kicked out of our Motherland through democratic means, it is very necessary for the NDA and the BJP to present a united front in the Lok Sabha Elections in 2014.

I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT DR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY IS GOING TO PLAY A STELLAR ROLE IN THE OUSTER OF SONIA GANDHI AND HER PARTY IN THE LOK SABHA ELECTIONS IN 2014.

I think that Madam Destiny who ushered in Dr Subramanian Swamy as a very young man in the arena of national politics at the highest level during the Emergency in June 1975, is going to play an equally decisive role in  the Battle Field of Political Kurukshetra in the Mahabharata War to be fought between against the ADHARMIC FORCES of UPA  and the  DHARMIC FORCES of  NDA in the Lok Sabha Polls 2014 to be held Next Year’’.

The Myriad Millions of India who are fed up with the totally corrupt, totally irresponsible, totally anti-national, totally anti-social UPA Government of Sonia Gandhi and Sonia Congress Party have already cast their Votes in favour   of  BJP’s Prime Ministerial Candidate Narendra Modi and the NDA Government to be formed in New Delhi in the next 10 Days.

Millions and Millions of India, from Kashmir to Kanyakumari, from the Rann of Kutch to Arunachal Pradesh, earnestly believe that Narendra Modi is a Great National Leader with Outstanding Leadership Qualities of unmatched Courage, Judgement, Integrity and vision. All their Prayers are going to be met in Full Measure in the next few days.

In his capacity as Chief Minister of Gujarat, Sri Narendra Modi has completely transformed the whole of Gujarat during the last 13 Years. The Mafia of Mass Media in India ---- both Print and Electronic --- have always targeted Sri Narendra Modi in the  last 13 Years in the same Manner as Adolf Hitler (1889-1945) persecuted the Jews in Concentration Camps in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945. These Vicious Men and Women in the  Sordid World of   Paid Media have never missed an opportunity to Extol Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi and to vilify and run down Sri Narendra Modi all the time. Perhaps these Wicked and Hypocritical Men and  Women in the Media have now  understood that their Grand Heroine  Sonia Gandhi may became the  Prime Minister of  Italy but never of India in the foreseeable future.

Sri Narendra Modi is indeed a Man of Destiny. Today he is walking with Destiny and in a few days from now he will be the Prime Minister of the Largest Democracy in the World. What accounts for his Meteoric Rise and Unbelievable Success in the World of Indian Politics and Our National  Public Life? I would give my answer in the words of a great Spiritual Poem by Swami Sivananda (1887-1963) :

                                    If any one speaks ill of you,
                                    Praise him always.
                                    If any one Injures you,
                                    Help him in all possible ways.
                                    YOU WILL ATTAIN IMMENSE STRENGTH.
                                    you will control anger and pride.
                                    you will enjoy peace, poise and serenity.
                                    you will become DIVINE. 

BHARAT VARSHA UNDER THE POWERFUL AND DYNAMIC LEADERSHIP OF SRI NARENDRA MODI WILL BECOME A SUPER POWER IN LESS THAN 10 YEARS.
Justice VR Krishna Iyer wrote the following Lines in a Message to Sri Narendra Modi in the last week of September 2013. I am quoting the following Excerpts from that Message:

  “ I  gather from the Media that Shri. Narendra Modi, presently Chief Minister of Gujarat is declared to be a candidate of BJP for the Prime Ministership of India. Without reference to his politics and as an independent myself, I wish him success since I am of the view that he has positive qualities of nationalism and Vision of Cosmic Dimension.  I am of the view that we should not have Nuclear Power in India. “NUCLEAR NEVER AND SOLAR EVER’’ is my Policy.  Narendra Modi stands for Solar Power.  No other State in India has developed Solar Power on such a grand scale as Narendri Modi has done in  Gujarat.

Mahatma Gandhi and the Constitution of India are against alcoholism which is a Multiple Evil and ruinous for the Indian People.  The only State which insists on PROHIBITION AND HAS PUT IT INTO PRACTICE IS NARENDRA MODI’S GUJARAT.  

So far as I can gather CORRUPTION in Public Life has been eliminated in Gujarat.  AS A MAN HIS INTEGRITY DESERVES GREAT PRAISE.  ON THE WHOLE HIS ADMINISTRATION DESERVES NATIONAL SUPPORT AND SO I WISH HIM THE RARE OPPORTUNITY TO BE THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA WHO WILL IMPLEMENT THE GREAT PRINCIPLE OF SWARAJ AND ERADICATE POVERTY’’. 
Now let me turn to DR.SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY.

Physical Courage, which despises all Danger, will make a Man Brave in One Way; and Moral Courage, which despises all Opinion, will make a Man Brave in another. The former would seem most necessary for the Military Camp; the latter for the Council; but to constitute a GREAT MAN, both are necessary. MY FRIEND DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY IS A MAN OF RARE PHYSICAL COURAGE AND RARER MORAL COURAGE.

Perhaps Robert Kennedy (1925-1968) had Uniquely Independent and Courageous Men like Dr. Subramanian Swamy in mind when he wrote the following lines towards the end of his life.

“Each time a man stands up for an Ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against Injustice, he sends forth a tiny Ripple of Hope, and crossing each other from a Million Different   Centres of Energy and Daring, those Ripples build a Current that can Sweep Down the Mightiest Walls of Oppression and Resistance. Few are willing to Brave the Disapproval of their Fellows, the Censure of their Colleagues, the Wrath of their Society. Moral courage is a Rarer Commodity than Bravery in Battle or Great Intelligence. Yet it is the One Essential, Vital Quality for Those who Seek to Change a World that Yields Most Painfully to Change.  AND I BELIEVE THAT IN THIS GENERATION THOSE WITH THE COURAGE TO ENTER THE MORAL CONFLICT WILL FIND THEMSELVES WITH COMPANIONS IN EVERY CORNER OF THE GLOBE”. 

Dr. Subramanian Swamy has been an Indefatigable Fighter against Injustice and Cruelty all his life. As a young student in the Indian Statistical Institute in Calcutta in the late 1950s and very early 1960s, he fought against the Injustice of Dr. Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis (1893-1972)  who wanted to destroy his Academic career . It was Dr.Paul Samuelson (1915-2009), the Nobel Laurette in Economics, who Recognized the Genius of Dr. Subramanian Swamy who was then studying in Harvard University under Dr.Paul Samuelson  for his Phd programme.  Later, on his return from United States, he was nominated to the Rajya Sabha by Shri Guruji  M S Golwalkar (1906-1973), the Second Sarsangchalak of the RSS.

 

When Dr. Subramanian Swamy was teaching Economics in the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) in Delhi in the late 1960s and early 1970s,  he used to be very critical of the Economic Policies of Indira Gandhi and the Congress Party. Indira Gandhi became very angry with Dr. Subramanian Swamy because of his independent opinions and she used the Might of her Office to destroy  Dr. Subramanian Swamy’s career. She had him placed under suspension and he fought against this unjust order of Suspension without a cause  at all levels Judiciary for more than 30 Years and finally won his battle at the level of the Supreme Court of India.  The Supreme Court ordered that the IIT Delhi should give back to Dr.  Subramanian Swamy all his Back Wages for the previous several decades when he was kept under Illegal  Suspension, mainly an account of the Arrogant  Wickedness of Indira Gandhi. 


During the Dark Days of Draconian Emergency imposed by that Cruel and Unscrupulous Dictator  Indira Gandhi between 1975-1977, Dr. Subramanian Swamy was only in his late 30s. He fought against the Emergency of  Indira Gandhi. Indira Gandhi  wanted to arrest him under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA) to ensure that he got no Bail from any Court of Law for One Year. When the Delhi Police were about to arrest him, he escaped from the Country and went to the United States. In the United States, Dr. Subramanian Swamy  started addressing several Public Meetings against the Emergency of Indira Gandhi. All the NRI Indians in USA at that time, rallied behind Dr.Subramanian Swamy in his Struggle against the Emergency declared by Indira Gandhi.


Mercifully, the then Government of Untied States, fully supported Dr.Subramanian Swamy on the ground that he was fighting only  for the restoration of Human and ocratic Rights in India. The Wicked Indira Gandhi used all her political influence to force the American Government at that time to extradite Dr. Subramanian Swamy from the US to India. She failed in her attempt because of the great sympathy the American Government had for Dr. Subramanian Swamy during that time.

 

Dr. Subramanian Swamy was  a member of the Rajya Sabha during the days of Emergency (1975-1977). According to the Rajya Sabha Rules, no Member can be absent from the House for more than certain days at a time. And if a Member absented himself beyond that prescribed limit, the Speaker had the Authority to Disqualify such a Member and remove him from the Rajya Sabha. As Dr. Subramanian Swamy was in the United States, Indira Gandhi thought that she can disqualify Dr. Subramanian Swamy and remove him from the Rajya Sabha, by invoking this Rule. On the Last Crucial  Day, (beyond which limit Dr. Subramanian Swamy would cease to be a Member of the Rajya Sabha) Indira Gandhi personally moved a resolution in the Rajya Sabha saying that Dr. Subramanian Swamy had been absent continuously for Several Months and that the Speaker should openly call for him in the House in Session. When the Speaker announced the name of Dr. Subramanian Swamy, LO AND BEHOLD, Dr. Subramanian Swamy , wearing the dress of  a Sikh Sardaji, raised his Hands and Shouted “I AM DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY.” When he Announced his Presence in the Open House,  it sent Shock Waves inside the Rajya Sabha. Indira Gandhi was furious and  ordered  Dr. Subramanian Swamy’s  Immediate Arrest.  But, Dr. Subramanian Swamy escaped from the Rajya Sabha in a few Seconds, in the manner of  A Lord Hanuman from Burning Palaces in Sri Lanka in the  Ramayana, or like Chathrapathi Shivaji from the Prison of Aurangezeb, The Mughal Emperor. Dr. Subramanian Swamy again escaped to America and created History for all time to come.  THIS WAS DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY -- A MAN OF GREAT DARING, FAMED IN SONG WITH MYTH AND LEGEND.

Dr Subramanian Swamy’s style of functioning is an amazing combination of Firmness and Flexibility, Egotism and Humility, Intolerance and Compassion, Independence and Loyalty, Fortitude and Pragmatism, Absolute Fearlessness and Reasonable Caution, and Finally Irrepressible Energy and Suave Calmness. He is a Rare Combination of Steel and Velvet, One who is as Hard as Rock and as Soft as Drifting Fog, one who Holds in his Heart and Mind the Paradox of Raging Storm and Tranquil Calm. The Great Paramacharya of Kanchi had with his Divine Prescience and Perspicacity, had in one Intuitive Swoop Seized and Understood  Dr.Subramanian Swamy’s Inimitable Qualities of Head and Heart and Blessed him.
                                              
Perhaps Dag  Hammarskjold (1905-1961),the Secretary of the Unites Nations had great men like Dr. Subramanian Swamy in mind, when he wrote the following Lines in his Famous Diary published under the title of “MARKINGS”  in 1961: “LIFE YIELDS ONLY TO THE CONQUEROR. NEVER ACCEPT WHAT CAN BE GAINED BY GIVING IN. YOU WILL BE LIVING OFF STOLEN GOODS, AND YOUR MUSCLES WILL ATROPHY”.

As a pan-Indian Leader transcending the narrow walls of caste, language and region, Dr Swamy exudes radical Nationalism in all his speeches and actions. His Nationalism, rooted in Sanatana Dharma, reflects his firm conviction that Hindu rights have to be upheld all the time. He has told me time and again: “We do not intend to seize the rights of anyone, but no one should attempt to seize our rights.”

NOW THE APPOINTED TIME FOR BOTH SRI NARENDRA MODI AND DR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY HAS COME .In this context, the Soaring and Roaring words of Sister Nivedita (1867-1911) become Relevant and Irreplaceable. She gave this Clarion Call to the Beleaguered and Battered People of Bharat Varsha during the Swadeshi Movement in 1906:“Age succeeds age in India, and even the voice of the Mother calls upon Her children to worship Her with new offerings, with renewal of their own greatness. Today she cries for the offering of Nationality. Today she asks, as a household Mother of the strong whom she has borne and bred, that we show to Her, not gentleness and submission, but manly strength and invincible might. Today she would that we play before Her with the sword. Today she would find Herself the Mother of a hero-clan. Today does she cry once more that she is hungered, and only by lives and blood of the crowned kings of men, can the citadel be saved.”

The Inimitable, the Inflexible, the Indomitable and the Irrepressible  Dr. Subramanian Swamy is the fittest man to be the FINANCE MINISTER OF INDIA under the GREAT, GRAND AND GLORIOUS PRIMINISTERSHIP  of Shri NARENDRA MODI, which is going to Inaugurate a New Era of National Renaissance in Bharat Varsha   within a few days after the 16th of  MAY 2014.
THESE TWO IRON MEN OF DESTINY ARE GOING TO MAKE BHARAT VARSHA   A SUPER POWER IN THE COMITY OF NATIONS. In this context, the following Vision of Resurgent India Proclaimed in 1898 by Mahadev Gobind Ranade (1842-1901), the Political Guru of Gopal Krishna Gokhale(1866-1915) comes to my mind:

“With buoyant hope, with liberated Manhood, with a faith that never shirks duty, with a sense of justice that deals fairly to all, with unclouded intellect and all her powers fully cultivated, and lastly, a love that overleaps all bounds, Renovated India will take her proper rank among the nations of the world, and be the Master of the Situation and of her own Destiny. This is the cherished home, this is the Promised Land. Happy are they who see it in distant vision; happier those who are permitted to work and clear the way onto it; and happiest those who live to see it with their own eyes and tread upon the holy soil once more.”

The story of 2014 campaign -- Narendra Modi

$
0
0

Extensive, Innovative and Satisfying: The Story of 2014 Campaign 

Author: Narendra Modi

Dear Friends,

Today marks the culmination of a long campaign for 2014 Lok Sabha Elections. I addressed my final rally in Ballia, the land of the hero of 1857 Mangal Pandey, in Eastern UP.
Since September 13th 2013 when the responsibility of being the BJP’s PM candidate was given to me, I have been travelling across the length and breadth of India. Friends in the Party told me that I have addressed rallies and programmes in almost 5800 locations, covering a distance of over 3 lakh kilometers. The number of rallies I addressed in this campaign season is 440, including the Bharat Vijay Rallies that I began with the blessings of Maa Vaishno Devi on 26thMarch 2014.
Extensive, Innovating and Satisfying: The Story of 2014 Campaign
The campaign was a wonderful opportunity to once again witness India’s celebrated diversity, the vibrancy of the people and the beauty of our culture. Working for the Organisation I have travelled across India in the past but this time it was very different. 
The unprecedented blessings I have received from the people have been very humbling. Conventional wisdom would suggest such a campaign would be tiring but I am experiencing a deep satisfaction and freshness that one would feel after a long and elaborate Sadhna. Through the campaign I got to worship the Janata Janardan.  
When I look back at the entire campaign, three words come to my mind – Extensive, Innovative and Satisfying. 
Throughout our campaign, we took agenda of development and good governance to every corner of India. People are tired of false promises, corruption and the same old tape-recorded messages ridden with dynastic references only to hide one’s own failure. They want a better tomorrow and NDA is the only alliance that can provide this change.
Nothing made me more glad than seeing the enthusiasm of our Karyakartas! They have worked tirelessly throughout the campaign. Seeing a rally on TV and social media is one experience but working on the ground is something out of the world! We do not view campaigns through the limited prism of electoral victory or defeat. A campaign becomes a life changing experience for the Karyakartas. It is a golden opportunity to strengthen and expand the Organisation and increases the bond between the people and the Karyakartas. Our Karyakartas went door-to-door and spread the Party’s message and we are very proud of them. Our campaign is the story of the hardwork of each and every BJP worker, who has selflessly set out to create a better India for future generations. 
In the entire campaign we received the continuous support and guidance of the leaders of the Party. We derive immense strength and inspiration from the solid experience and wisdom of our leaders and their active participation in the campaign gave us an impetus and boosted the confidence of Karyakartas. 
This campaign will be remembered for path breaking innovation. In a polity where political campaigns were more about one-way communication, our Chai Pe Charcha was an innovative break from the past.  Charchas were held in over 4,000 locations across India. During these Charchas, I sat for hours and heard the views of the people and then answered their questions on a wide range of issues. One of the Charchas was held in Wardha (Maharashtra) where I met families of farmers who had committed suicide. I was really saddened. After so many years of freedom, our farmers are still ending their lives even as the present Government watches on silently. For how long can we let this go on?
Innovation was seen in the Bharat Vijay 3D rallies. In one month I addressed 12 rounds of 3D rallies covering 1350 locations. The response to the 3D rallies was phenomenal. So many youngsters wrote to me on mail and social media ‘thanking’ me for coming to their village. People told our Karyakartas- we want to meet Modi ji on stage…such was the buzz these rallies generated.
For the first time in the history of Indian electioneering an exclusive volunteer portal was set up in the form of India272+(http://www.india272.com). All one had to do was log in and begin work either online or by participating in the onground activities. Through India272+ we sought inputs from our volunteers. I was truly enriched by their ideas and contribution. Such forums have the potential to revolutionize campaigning and create a paradigm shift in interfacing and mobilizing well-wishers.
It was amazing how all forms of social media were innovatively used throughout the campaign. This includes the ever popular WhatsApp- a lot of friends showed me innovative WhatsApp messages, campaign slogans and infograhpics that were hugely popular. After casting my vote I shared my own Selfie and called for your Selfies. This generated tremendous buzz on social media. I also had a free and frank interaction with several friends from the print and electronic media. I was interviewed by the Hindi, Regional and English media.
I cannot forget the affection I have received in the last eight months. The events of Patna will remain etched in my memory- there were live bombs on one side but the resolve of the people prevailed. Nobody left the venue of the rally. I had a clear message that day that I repeated often during the campaign- we can decide whether we want to fight each other or we want to unite to fight poverty? The former will lead us nowhere while the latter will take our Nation to greater heights.
Most importantly I wish to thank the people of India who joined our rallies, 3D events and Charchas in large numbers. People cutting across all age groups and transcending barriers of caste, creed or religion joined us. I often said that Narendra Modi or any one else is not fighting these elections. The people of India have taken these elections on their shoulders. Each and every citizen of India has become a driving force of change.
In most places where I addressed rallies, it was very hot yet people came in record numbers. A few days ago when I was in Visakhapatnam, it suddenly started raining during the rally. Yet the people remained. No words will be able to convey my gratitude to the people. I assure the people of India that I will repay this overwhelming affection with unprecedented development that will lay the foundations of a strong India.
The campaign has ended today but one phase of the Elections remains. I urge all those voting in the final phase to vote in record numbers, especially the youth. Please go to vote, take your family and friends to vote. Every vote matters! 
As I travelled across India I could not help but think- there is something in this soil that makes India special. History is full of examples of how our land has shown the way to the world and today once again, our destined role of a Jagad Guru calls us. Let us rise to the occasion and create a strong, developed & inclusive India that will show the way to the world. 
Yours,
Narendra Modi 

A security memo to India’s new Prime Minister -- Madhav Nalapat

$
0
0
SATURDAY | MAY 10, 2014
MADHAV NALAPAT
ROOTS OF POWER
A security memo to India’s new Prime Minister
Security system needs to shift from overt monitoring to hidden methods.
National security was not a priority for the PM.
part from ensuring that Congress president Sonia Gandhi continued to entrust him with the occupation of the most prestigious room in South Block, it is not clear as to exactly what Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's priorities were. Certainly, national security was not on the list. During the 10-odd years that he has been PM, terror networks have sprouted across India, and sleeper cells with their deadly potential have multiplied. A country from where Al Qaeda was absent has now become among the most preferred locations for that organisation, an affinity directly related to the weak monitoring and follow up of (sadly infrequent) leads on terror operations and their attempted perpetrators. That India has thus far escaped serious terror-related damage is traceable not to an improved national security system but because the attention of several such networks is focused elsewhere.
Kashmir is no longer the priority it once was, now that more and more from even the extremist community in the Valley has seen for themselves the hell that is life across the Line of Control. The cockpit of operations is Af-Pak, and only when the Taliban regain control of Kabul will the attention of them and their associates return to India, this time not just to Kashmir but the entire country. Indeed, this is the reason why it has to be a security priority for India to ensure that the elected government in Kabul be given the weapons and training needed to defeat the Taliban, a line of action which Manmohan Singh has thus far declined to do, presumably because the Obama administration cannot as yet make up its mind as to whether it wants such muscular Indian involvement or not.
The neglect of Afghanistan by Manmohan Singh can be illustrated by the fact that the Ministry of Human Resource Development and the Ministry of Home Affairs have yet to give sanction to a university in India to serve as the mentor for the new University of Afghanistan, a university that will be the mother institution for the entire higher education sector in that country. It is not known as to whether it is the ever-present urge within the ranks of the Manmohan Council of Ministers to tilt to US fiats that is behind such a delay. Certainly, the Obama administration would prefer a US university to be the mentor of the new University of Afghanistan, rather than one located in India.
Whatever, the example illustrates the neglect of a comprehensive India-Afghanistan relationship by Team Manmohan. Avoiding the wilful errors in security policy caused by the leadership of a Prime Minister clueless about matters of national security has to be priority for the new PM. He (or she) can make a start by ensuring that every day, he (or she) has, as the first meeting, a session with the heads of the National Technical Research Organisation, Research and Analysis Wing and the IB. Neither the National Security Adviser nor the Home Minister ought to be present at such meetings; else the freedom to give views entirely frankly will be absent.
While Sushilkumar Shinde is solely interested in the politics of Maharashtra (just as A.K. Antony is about Kerala) and shows it, in the case of P. Chidambaram, while he was Home Minister and was chairing such meetings, his predilections and contempt for an opposing viewpoint ensured that neither the RAW nor the IB chief could brief him with the undiluted honesty required in such a meeting (in which minutes should not be taken).
While Manmohan Singh was too unconcerned to meet his security chiefs except on infrequent intervals, and delegated such essential work to other ministers or to his officials, the new PM should meet the NTRO, RAW and IB chiefs daily for a briefing on the real time situation and possible courses of action. Next, there ought to be a more comprehensive focus on threats. At present, more than 90% of attention and resources is being devoted to standard terror operations, neglecting the risks to security from economic espionage and sabotage, and from cyber attacks. All three need attention, as well as coordination in action.
To ensure this, the security system in India needs to shift from overt monitoring to recessed methods that remain as hidden from non-official eyes as are systems operating in countries such as the US and the UK. The sooner databases get linked up and biometric information get collated, the sooner there be a vigorous process of sharing of information and planning of operations, the better will be the overall ability to spot a perpetrator before a bomb gets detonated or sabotage (including on advanced ships or aircraft by sleepers hidden within the services) gets carried out. In such a task, fully domestic IT companies and fully domestic financial entities need to be involved, the way they are in the US and the UK, or indeed in China. The NGO sector needs far more attention as an information and activity source, the way it is in the three countries mentioned. Up to now, the security services have operated as though they were still in the era of the British Raj. The incoming Prime Minister needs to drag this essential function of the state into the 21st century. He (or she) will find within the security agencies several individuals whose competence and dedication remains unmatched, even if they have been neglected for long by successive regimes unwilling to move from a 19th (or in patches 20th) century model to the 21st century version our country needs.
http://www.sunday-guardian.com/analysis/a-security-memo-to-indias-new-prime-minister

India set for Modi era, end of dynasty rule -- Kanchan Gupta

$
0
0

INDIA SET FOR MODI ERA, END OF DYNASTY RULE

Sunday, 11 May 2014 | Kanchan Gupta
May 16 could turn out to be a day remembered in history as the day India liberated itself from thraldom of its deracinated elite, and the false gods foisted upon the masses by the self-serving Delhi Durbar
As the Sun sets on Saturday, campaigning for the last phase of the 2014 Lok Sabha election draws to a close. On Monday, May 12, the last of the constituencies — 41 of them, in Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and Bihar — will go to the polls and with that we would have put behind us India’s longest election stretched over more than a month. Technically, the curtains will come down on May 16, when the votes will be counted and the winner of this summer’s battle for the masnad of Delhi declared. But, for all practical purposes, the much awaited election — the gripping excitement and tidal wave of anticipation of change are reminiscent of what I can recall of the popular mood in 1977 when Indira Gandhi’s Emergency regime was booted out of office — would come to an end with the last vote being cast on Monday.
While it is tempting to predict the outcome of this election, it would be wise to refrain from doing so. Not because there’s any doubt that the Nehru household owned Congress will suffer a crushing defeat but because wisdom lies in not putting a limit to the BJP's performance. The tsunami of support for BJP’s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi that has washed India from shore to shore could make any prediction, no matter how scientifically derived, appear ill-informed. Modi began the campaign aiming for 272 seats; he has ended the campaign asking for a final push to make that 300 seats. Cynics would scoff at those numbers and Cassandras would foresee doom, but those who have been out in the dust and heat of the campaign know that this election could post an extraordinary verdict.
Who could have foreseen, barring the few who had long ago vested their faith in Modi and were silently, tirelessly working behind the scenes to prepare the ground for his eventual bid for the Prime Minister’s office, that an interaction with students of Shri Ram College of Commerce in Delhi University would turn out to be a historic event, the opening gambit in a game that destiny seems to have willed Modi shall win? Indeed, till the last minute announcement by BJP president Rajnath Singh on the concluding day of the party’s National Executive meeting in Goa on June 9, 2013, that Modi would head the Election Campaign Committee, which formally made him the first among equals, there were some within and many outside the party who were hoping history would take a different course. That a BJP led by Modi would be a formidable force was a reality even then; it turned into an indisputable fact when he was named the party’s prime ministerial candidate on September 13. Since then Force NaMo has dominated the electoral landscape, dwarfing pretenders to the throne and decimating foes, metaphorically if not literally.
Irrespective of the results and the final margin of the BJP’s victory this summer’s election will be remembered for several reasons. For me, three stand out for their political significance. First, Modi has turned conventional wisdom on its head by strategising and executing an innovative campaign that had three hallmarks: Communicate directly to the masses and connect with them; set an agenda and stick to it no matter how grave the provocation to shift focus; reach out to every section of society across every corner of the country and not remain restricted to urban constituencies where Modimania took shape and form in its early days. Modi decided that he would contest this election on the strength of his development record in Gujarat. And he stuck to that agenda, straying now and then, but never too far. He invariably returned to showcasing his proven ability to deliver good governance. The Congress tried to convert the election into a referendum on ‘secularism’ versus ‘communalism’ and, as is obvious even to its core supporters by now, has ended up with egg on its face. India is tired of clichés and tattered lines no longer excite the popular imagination. Modi sensed this better than anybody else and turned himself into asapno ka saudagar, merchant of dreams, reviving hope among the hopeless, resuscitating faith in India’s ability to compete and succeed, to prosper and grow, reenergising a listless Young India into the engine that has virtually driven his campaign.
Second, he has used volunteers, mostly young, some barely out of their teens, many who either gave up their well-paying jobs or took time off, as a force multiplier. ‘India 272+’, the rubric under which volunteers from India and abroad gathered to work for Modi’s campaign, is the first such attempt, at once innovative and audacious, that not only supplemented the BJP’s organisational strength, it also served to make people feel they were part of the ‘change’ that Modi’s advent on the centrestage of national affairs would herald. This sense of involvement played a key role in helping Modi to connect with the masses, as did his amazing oratorical skills. He spoke from the heart, he spoke unrehearsed, he spoke with conviction and he spoke with passion. The message was always simple: Trust me, and I won’t betray your trust. We also saw the amazing use of technology to carry Modi’s message to the voters — whether in the form of vigorous and relentless canvassing of support on social media platforms, which have come of age in this election, or 3D hologram rallies that enabled Modi to be virtually ‘present’ at a hundred places at the same time. Technology by itself is not necessarily a big contributor to an election campaign; others, most notably the Congress, have tried to use it too this year. It’s the creative use of technology by those who dare to think out of the box, as Team Modi did, that has made Modi’s campaign a winner.
Third, though it wasn’t Modi but his adversaries who brought it to the fore, his identity as someone who has risen from extremely humble origins through sheer dint of hard work and merit has made him one among the masses, someone who represents the vast majority of India, a leader who loathes the Delhi establishment and whom the Delhi establishment fears in equal measure. The masses identified with the ‘chaiwallah’ from Ahmedabad, in him they saw reflected their own dreams, their own aspirations, their own disdain for the elite which is blamed for the mess in which the country finds itself today. Modi as Prime Minister would not only mark the end of Delhi Durbar’s rule over India, it would also start the process of seizing power from a few and bestowing it to the many. The road to revolution, my generation was told, lay through Peking and Calcutta. It has turned out to be from Gandhinagar to New Delhi. The fall of the Delhi Durbar is something generations of Indians have desired. Hopefully we will get to witness it soon, along with the fall and eventual decline of the Nehru Dynasty.
In a sense, May 16 could turn out to be a day remembered in history as the day India liberated itself from thraldom of its deracinated elite, and the false gods foisted upon the masses by that self-serving Delhi Durbar. Modi is both the leader and liberator India has awaited all these decades of decay.
(The writer is a senior journalist based in Delhi) 
http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/coffee-break/india-set-for-modi-era-end-of-dynasty-rule.html

World takes a view on Narendra Modi -- Pramit Pal Chaudhuri. Society is with the Sangh -- Ashwani

$
0
0
iconimg Sunday, May 11, 2014
Pramit Pal Chaudhuri, Hindustan Times
May 11, 2014
The greater stake a foreign government has in India the more hopeful it is that the stars of May 16 will align for Narendra Modi. This has little do with Modi himself. It has everything to do with the belief he is the only prime ministerial candidate who can form a stable, functional government in New Delhi.

While it may be woven in the fabric of the domestic debate over Modi, the fact is that the anti-Muslim riots of 2002 elicit minimal international interest. Governments are indifferent. A handful of human rights groups in the West have campaigned against Modi. The Western visa ban was the high watermark of their influence.

This is evident among Muslim governments. Representatives from key Persian Gulf countries regularly attended the post-riot Vibrant Gujarat summits.
The ambassadors of key Arab states point to Modi’s repeated statements that “I will follow the foreign polices of the Vajpayee led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government.”  Said diplomats from two Gulf states, “We had excellent relations with the first NDA government and so Modi doesn’t bother us.”

The Arab governments are not even concerned that, by all accounts, that Modi’s most favoured nation is Israel. They see a convergence between India’s two national parties when it comes to Israel — low profile, high density relations. In any case, Rahul Gandhi is known to be an admirer of the Jewish state.

The real cheerleaders for Modi are the East Asians.

Thanks to the West’s boycott, Modi’s foreign visits have been skewed in favour of Southeast Asia, Japan and China. He has wooed their investment and brought it to Gujarat. Hence their enthusiasm: they want to do business and he’s got a track record. Topping the list is Japan which has ambitious plans on the economic and strategic front with India. While PM Manmohan Singh is also a Japanophile, Tokyo hopes Modi will convert vision into concrete action.

It says something that Beijing is almost as desperate for a decisive  Modi victory. That Chinese and Japanese officials, representing governments barely on speaking terms with each other, are hoping for the same thing is evidence of the overriding international desire for an India that works.

The new Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, wants to stabilise his southern boundary at a time when he plans major economic reforms at home. Beijing has long felt that the shallowness of the Sino-Indian economic relationship — lots of trade but no investment — is one reason for its volatility.  As China’s ambassador, Wei Wei, said recently Chinese foreign direct investment into India was “a far from satisfactory” $940 million.

Modi, Beijing believes, will be more confident about opening up to Chinese investment than the present Congress-led regime. While Modi has attacked Beijing during his campaign, Chinese officials say that his rhetoric was “standard” and did not alarm them.

The European governments have an even narrower focus: trade and investment. Many have noticed his call for the Indian external affairs ministry to focus on “trade treaties” rather than just strategic issues. They hope this reflects a sense of policy priority for the India-European Union free trade agreement, presently in negotiating limbo, is number one on their agenda.
That India’s trade treaty negotiations have ground to a halt across the board is a grouse of many foreign governments. It is not just the big daddy trading partners like Europe and the United States — it is also mercantile centres like Taiwan or Switzerland who are waiting for closure on half-negotiated trade pacts.  The two problematic areas in the world when it comes to Modi are the US and the immediate Indian neighbourhood.

Washington was the last Western capital to re-engage with Modi and, in theory, has yet to revoke the visa ban. Modi has signalled that he will follow Vajpayee’s path “and this also applies to the relationship with the US.” Putting India’s economy back on the growth path would automatically improve relations with the US. The real challenge is that president Barack Obama is disinterested in any major US engagement with any part of the world. His indifference to India is less about Modi and more about his own isolationism.
Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and other smaller neighbours are also curious to see how Modi’s opposition to the Bangladesh land border agreement and his alliances with anti-Colombo Tamil parties will bleed into his foreign policies when in office. Most are optimistic that they will not.

After five years of India being the sick man of Asia, foreign governments seem universally to want New Delhi back on its feet. Seen as the only person who can do that, Modi becomes, by default the preferred candidate.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/popup/2014/5/11_05_14-metro19a.jpg

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/allaboutnarendramodi/world-takes-a-view-of-narendra-modi/article1-1218002.aspx

In Indian Candidate, Hindu Right Sees a Reawakening

Narendra Modi, leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party and the front-runner for prime minister, flashed supporters the victory sign in Varanasi on Thursday. CreditKevin Frayer/Getty Images
VARANASI, India — Shortly after dawn in the village square here each day, two dozen boys and men dress up in crisply laundered khaki shorts and fall into military-style formation behind a saffron-colored flag, brandishing bamboo sticks as if they were rifles.
They spend the next hour performing highly structured drills that interweave physical training with religious indoctrination, ending with 108 repetitions of the chant “Ram Ram,” which refers to a Hindu deity, and a song whose refrain is, “The nation should awaken.” This is a local branch of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, an ideological organization whose fortunes have ebbed and flowed for decades with the influence of Hindu nationalists in New Delhi.
With India’s national election campaign in its final stages, the R.S.S. has thrown its weight behind Narendra Modi, who has been active in the group since childhood and is now the front-runner for prime minister, India’s highest office. The group’s leaders describe the current voter-turnout drive as the biggest mobilization since 1977, when R.S.S. workers went door to door encouraging people to vote against Indira Gandhi, sometimes going so far as to wheel them to the polls on manual tricycles.
Photo
Narendra Modi at a rally last month in Sidhauli. India’s nine-phase election, which began April 7, will end on Monday. CreditDaniel Berehulak for The New York Times
These activists count Mr. Modi as one of their own and see in him a chance to move long-cherished goals to the top of the national agenda. For years, they have sought a rollback of laws and programs tailored to India’s Muslims, the opening of Kashmiri property to buyers from other parts of India, and the redrafting of public school textbooks, among other goals.
As a candidate, Mr. Modi has made economic growth and development his central theme, building a vast electoral base that includes moderates and minority groups. He has pushed traditional Hindu-right projects to the margins of his campaign, and canvassers from the R.S.S. and its affiliates have avoided controversial subjects, limiting themselves mainly to exhortations to vote.
But in interviews, many expressed certainty that, with the election over, Mr. Modi would take action on a religious and cultural agenda.
“We can all see it now, that it is happening — that the awakening is happening,” said Praveen Rai, 38, who leads the morning drills here in Varanasi, one of India’s spiritual capitals. “Political churning is not very important for us,” he added. “What we believe is that we are the most advanced race in the entire world. We will convert the whole world into the Aryan race: So we have decided. We believe that Indian culture has been the best civilization in the world.”
Mr. Modi has practical reasons to distance himself from the Hindu right wing. His campaign, which has won the support of large corporations, has focused on a pledge to attract investment and manufacturing, a goal that demands domestic stability and collides with the R.S.S.’s protectionist tradition. He is known as an independent decision-maker who, in 12 years as leader of the state of Gujarat, regularly resisted attempts by R.S.S. leaders to influence him, journalists who covered his tenure say.
Asked last month about the R.S.S.’s muscular assistance, Arun Jaitley, a top official in Mr. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party, dismissed the notion that the group would have a place in a postelection government.
“People who do have a lot of ideological affinity to us have been extremely active and helpful in this campaign, not so much as organizations but as individuals,” Mr. Jaitley said. “As far as governance is concerned, we have been in power as a political party, and I can assure you we take our own decisions.”
Ambiguity has long surrounded the R.S.S. It was founded in 1925 by Keshav Baliram Hedgewar, an independence campaigner who had split from the Indian National Congress party over what he considered “undue pampering of the Muslims,” according to “R.S.S.: A Vision in Action,” published by the group in 1988. Its central ritual and recruiting tool is the morning drill, known as the daily shakha, which was designed to “create an all-Bharat national consciousness.”
The Indian government banned the R.S.S. for 17 months in 1948 after a man associated with the group assassinated Mohandas Gandhi, and for brief periods in the 1970s and 1990s. Its opponents say it fuels religious conflict. For many years, the group has maintained that it has no involvement in Indian politics, saying its mission is focused on character-building. But many of its members have gone on to become candidates for the Bharatiya Janata Party, whose spokeswoman recently referred to the R.S.S. as the party’s “ideological fountainhead.”
“The B.J.P. and the R.S.S. are married to each other,” said Dilip Deodhar, an analyst whose family has been active in the R.S.S. for generations. “The power is there, but it is like that of a mother over her children. The mother does not use it for anything but the child’s welfare. There is no abusing it.”
The current campaign has thrust the group into an unusually public role. In October, the R.S.S.’s leader, Mohan Bhagwat, ordered the group and its affiliates to press for 100 percent voter turnout, according to Ram Madhav, a spokesman for the organization. Last week in Varanasi, an intense electoral battleground, some 5,000 R.S.S. volunteers were circulating — nearly as many as the 6,000 sent out by the B.J.P., according to Ashok Pandey, a B.J.P. spokesman.
Pramod Kumar — an R.S.S. propagandist, based in Varanasi — praised Mr. Bhagwat’s order.
“It was a very good feeling — that we were going backwards; the country’s religion, integrity and culture was on the back foot; and that we are going to set it straight,” he said. “Ever since I was born, I have been waiting for good things to happen in this country. Most definitely, that moment is here.”
Asked what changes he hoped to see after the election, Mr. Kumar reeled off a laundry list. He began by saying that Wendy Doniger’s book “The Hindus: An Alternative History,” recently withdrawn from publication in India, “should not be out in the Western press.” He called for an overhaul of government textbooks, which he said included insulting language about Hindu gods and excessive praise of the Muslim emperor Akbar. He also said he expected the reconstruction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya, on a spot where a 16th-century mosque once stood.
“It’s deep inside of our hearts, the Ram temple, and it’s on — 75 percent of the work is done,” Mr. Kumar said, adding that he did not mind the B.J.P.’s decision to soft-pedal the issue in its election manifesto. “I can just fold my hands and quietly say the temple must be built, or someone can make a big hue and cry about it. It makes no difference. The temple must be built. It’s normal. It will happen after the election.”
In the meantime, the R.S.S. has provided many of the same electoral advantages for the B.J.P. as megachurches in the American heartland do for candidates: a highly disciplined and structured canvassing force, and village-level networks of contacts.Others, however, were irritated. “It is with a lot of slyness that the B.J.P. has included this only on the last page,” said Praveen Kumar Chaubey, 24, a volunteer with Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, a student group affiliated with the R.S.S. “I feel it has been pushed down because they don’t want to hurt the sentiments of certain groups. Our sentiment is that it should be a magnificent reconstruction of the temple, and we are there.”
Ashwani, 29, an R.S.S. propagandist, was going door to door in the village of Baburi on Monday. When one of his subordinates mentioned a divisive subject — the lifting of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which grants Kashmir a degree of autonomy — Ashwani chided him.
“Our biggest theme is the politics of development,” he said. “I’ll give you an example. If the road is built properly, a Muslim will walk on it, a Sikh will walk on it and a Hindu will walk on it. If electricity is flowing, a Muslim can use it, a Sikh can use it and a Hindu can use it.”
Modi fever seemed to have taken hold in the village. In the narrow street, where storefronts offered piles of iced pomegranates and fired earthen pots, a stereo blared a delirious pop tune whose lyrics were “Har har Modi,” a slogan that echoes Hindu prayer. “This is Modi’s tea — you must have it,” one shopkeeper said exuberantly, thrusting a clay into a visitor’s hand.
A Muslim shopkeeper across the street watched, stone-faced. When asked about Mr. Modi, the shopkeeper, who refused to give his name, referred to bloody religious riots that broke out under Mr. Modi’s watch in 2002. “Do you think we are going to vote for the murderer?” he asked.
Ashwani did not hear that exchange, because he was chatting on the phone with an acquaintance who was interested in joining the R.S.S. Hanging up, he said he expected the organization’s membership to surge in the coming years. “Society is with the Sangh,” he said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/11/world/asia/in-indian-candidate-hindu-right-sees-a-reawakening.html?hp&_r=0

Deceptive islamist support for Nigerian girls -- Andrew E. Harrod. ‘Allah says I should sell. He commands me to sell. I will sell women. I sell women’.- Taslima Nasreen

$
0
0
May 082014

‘Allah says I should sell. He commands me to sell. I will sell women. I sell women’.

“I abducted your girls. I will sell them in the market, by Allah,” a man claiming to be Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau said.
There is no reason to not believe what this man is saying. Once upon a time when a man said, ‘Allah asked me to fuck my wife’s slave, so I fucked. Or Allah asked me to fuck my son’s wife, so I fucked. Or Allah asked me to fuck the captive women, so I fucked’, everybody believed in him. People still believe in that fucker.
So what is the problem to believe now that the Nigerian man is telling the truth that Allah asks him to sell women? He should get billions of followers. Allah talks to him, he must be a prophet. Who the fuck says there will be no more prophet? Abubakar Shekau must have direct contact with Allah, or who will give him a bunch of anti-women advices but Him?
Long live Abubakar Shekau (peace be upon him)!
  1. Anamika Reddy
    These free men want only to be ruled by Allah. These free men enslave women. They believe in a god who frees men and hates women, and wraps them in black cloth.
  2. 2
    F [i'm not here, i'm gone]
    Not only does this guy have a serious problem with violence and ethics, the more I read of his words, the more he sounds like an evil children’s reading primer. If only stupid were capable of harming the one wielding it more often than others.
  3. 3
    laxman
    rightly said
  4. 4
    raju
    Male chauvinists in order to satiate their sexual lust and dominate women fall upon this perverted portions of religious texts called sacred in order to subjugate free voice and justify & fulfill their perverted sexual lust as call of the divine while it is nothing but forced prostitution free of charge and at the same time condemn kill prostitutes who r doing it for their livelihood calling it sin.
  5. 5
    Univerbuddy
    //*** People still believe in that fucker. //
    Wonderful observation.
  6. 6
    ananya
    it z terrifyng to know how these perverts jstify their crimes by invoking smthng non exsistnt………they use allah as a shield to hide the devil inside dm…..a dangerous trend indeed…… :’(
  7. 7
    busterggi
    If nothing else the sheik’s comments support the fact that Allah is just another name for Yahweh – both have the exact same ideas about women & slavery.
  8. 8
    lorn
    This God being seems to be quite felicitous in demands. He/she/it, based upon numerous testimonies and estimation of likely tendencies seems to send messages which align quite well with existing views, preferences, and tendencies of people he/she/it chooses to talk to. God tends to tell them to hate people they already hate and to do what the listener is already inclined to do. Handy that.
  9. 9
    Mriganka Bhattacharyya
    I hope the girls will be released safely!
  10. 10
    Milon Ahmed
    Allah can do. Religion is the main obstacle to women empowerment.
  11. 11
    sqlrob
    @ananya
    it z terrifyng to know how these perverts jstify their crimes by invoking smthng non exsistnt………they use allah as a shield to hide the devil inside dm…..a dangerous trend indeed…… :’(
    Is it a trend when it’s been happening millenia? Is there a point in history where things like that DIDN’T happen?
http://freethoughtblogs.com/taslima/2014/05/08/allah-says-i-should-sell-he-commands-me-to-sell-i-will-sell-women-i-sell-women/




Steven Emerson, Executive DirectorMay 9, 2014

Deceptive Islamist Support for Nigerian Girls

by Andrew E. Harrod
Special to IPT News
May 9, 2014
 Send RSSShare: Facebook Twitter Google +1
  Be the first of your friends to like this.

A coalition of American Muslim leaders came together at a press conferenceThursday at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. to condemn Boko Haram's (BH) April 14 kidnapping of 276 Nigerian schoolgirls. Yet the participants' deficient frankness about Islamic doctrine made their denunciations ring hollow.
"Islam is not the problem," insisted Ahmed Bedier, a Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Tampa chapter founder. "No one is buying their story," Bedier argued with respect to Islamic claims of BH. He dismissed them as "just another con" whose "ideology comes from nowhere" in a country known for scams.
Bedier's assessment might surprise BH's leader, Abubakar Shekau. Known as "Darul Tawheed," an expert in monotheism, Shekau studied under a cleric and then at Borno State College of Legal and Islamic Studies. A profile also describes Shekau's predecessor, deceased BH founder Mohammed Yusuf, as a "charismatic, well-educated cleric who drove a Mercedes as part of his push for a pure Islamic state in Nigeria."
"We didn't ask if Christianity is the problem" with respect to Uganda's brutal Lord's Resistance Army, Bedier analogized. Yet human rights abuses in Islam's name, especially against women and girls, extend beyond Nigeria. Survey results report the "Arab Spring" had a detrimental impact on women, including the reemergence of child marriage in Syria. Women's rights are also a concern in both European Islamic immigrant communities and in Brunei after its recent introduction of sharia law, including stoning for adulterous women.
BH likewise appeared to CAIR-Maryland Vice President Zainab Chaudry as a "vicious cult." BH's "maniacal and suicidal interpretation of Islam" also drew condemnation fromJohari Abdul-Malik, an imam at northern Virginia's Dar al-Hijrah mosque. BH is "madness masquerading as religion," Imam Mahdi Bray agreed, and its crimes violate "core Islamic teachings," said Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) analyst Hoda Elshishtawy.
"We need to unite across all faith lines," Bray said, with ecumenical concern for the kidnapping victims, "until all our girls are brought home."
Bedier and others considered BH violence symptomatic of Nigerian social ills like poverty. Martin Luther King, a "drum major for justice," likewise came to Bray's mind during an interview. King was "standing up for the poor and the oppressed" with jobs and education. Nigerian government response to the kidnappings, meanwhile, reminded Bedier of American "outrage" following official American handling of Hurricane Katrina.
"Education is one of the greatest counter-terrorism programs," said Abdul-Malik. Punning BH's Hausa slang meaning of "Western education is sin [haram]," Hakeem Kareem from the National Council of Nigerian Muslim Organizations called "Western education…Boko Halal" or permitted. Kareem referenced Nigerian Muslim doctors involved in disease eradication.
Other areas of the world, meanwhile, suffer from poverty, such as Haiti, still rebuildingfrom the 2010 earthquake which killed at least 250,000 people and displaced another 1.5 million. Yet somehow these countries do not devolve into misogynist paradises for "vicious cults."
The presenters rejected any questions about Islam's treatment of women as beyond the event's purview, even though Boko Haram announced plans condemned by the speakers to force its captives into sexual relationships or even "marriages." BH's actions paralleled Islamic doctrine justifying child marriage that had blocked in Nigeria's Muslim-majority northern states from implementing legislation for an 18-year-old age of consent for marriage. By contrast, Nigeria's Christian-majority southern states passed such legislation.
Although Bedier called for Americans to "use our resources for something that is positive," he offered few specifics. He advocated drone use in Nigeria "for surveillance," not combat. Noting that BH sometimes outgunned government forces, Bray suggested that America aid Nigeria with intelligence and the FBI's hostage rescue team along with the United Nations.
Nigerian Christian leaders have identified most of the kidnapped girls as Christian, corresponding to BH's targeting of Nigerian Christians to create Muslim-ruled regions. This sectarian divide, and not any religiously neutral socioeconomic deprivation often cited by American officials, has motivated BH, Christian human rights advocates have long contended (see here and here). Yet, the online conference announcement described the "kidnapping of Muslim girls." Abdul-Malik called that a mistake.
He noted that BH, as a "takfiri" group with a "medieval, feudal perspective," also targets Muslim opponents as apostates. He had no interest, however, in the "mission creep" of questions concerning traditional Islamic death penalties for apostasy/blasphemy recurring in the modern world.
Boko Haram has been massacring Christians and other foes for years, yet only a crime shocking the world attracted the attention of these American-Islamist groups. Ablogger's search of CAIR's website, for example, revealed only one entry for BH (post-press conference, two). CAIR condemned a 2011 bombing, but Chaudry claimed CAIR's "focus is not international" as a "domestic organization." Such domesticity, though, has not prevented CAIR from criticizing Israeli military action, or from defending Muslim Brotherhood leaders in Egypt, something Chaudry did not feel at liberty to address. Chaudry also refrained from addressing child marriage in Nigeria, something not supported by Islam according to her assertions.
Speakers at Thursday's news conference hardly reassured that they would adequately address the Islamic dangers posed in Nigeria by movements like BH. Not for nothing does BH's "formal Arabic name" mean Jam'at Ahl as-Sunnah lid-da'wa wal-Jihad, or "The Fellowship of the People of the Tradition for Preaching and Holy War," Islam apostate and critic Ayaan Hirsi Ali observes.
As the Canadian Muslim reformer Tarek Fatah notes, wartime sex slavery does find sanction in Islamic sources, highlighting the need for open discussion of Islam's various controversies. "We either develop the maturity to say, such Islamic injunctions do not apply anymore," Fatah writes, "or we can keep on driving fast-forward in reverse gear…every time we hit an obstacle that appears in our blind spot, we can blame it on 'Islamophobia.'"
Those at Thursday's news conference chose the latter.
"There is a time when silence is betrayal," Bray quoted King, a comment applicable to the press conference itself.

Enormity of the democratic revolution in India, philosophy of symbolic forms

$
0
0
What Indians have accomplished in 2014 is a civilizational moment of enormous significance in the affairs of people.

Consistent with the idea of satyagraha which attained independence from colonial yoke in August 1947, people of India have spoken through the ballot.

Two great men arrived on the scene. One was Narendra Modi who had an extraordinary talent to directly connect with the people in an intimate conversational mode without any artificial tenors or turns of phrase deployed by some orators only to confound the audience. The other was Subramanian Swamy who was able to connect with the social media through groups exemplified by Patriotic Tweeters.

The message of Modi on the destiny of India as a resurgent power has been delivered with astonishing fervor and aplomb. All through the campaign which started in September 2013 and ended on May 10, 2014, there has not been a single moment of goof-up or false or empty rhetoric. What came through was a message delivered with clarity directly impacting every Indian present in a public meeting or in front of the TV screen or through slip-shod media snippets reported with mischievous or malafide intent. Many attempts were made to humiliate Modi or Subramanian Swamy but they have conducted themselves with grace and dignity, true to the traditions of the Hindu civilization.

Despite the shenanigans of the fraudulent mainstream media efforts and bogus, psecularatti positing anarchist or dynastic chamchagiri, the message of Modi and Swamy have reached and touched every Indian. This delivery process is no mean achievement. It is just stunning for the simple reason that the message was delivered with honesty and nationalist fervor.

What stands out in the entire messaging process is that India has demonstrated a national identity beyond the fissiparous and divisive agendas of motivated rascals.

The disinformation campaigns were rendered to be hoaxes because they were delivered with such dishonesty reminiscent of only of the scams galore that characterised the SoniaG and Congi regime of over 60 years.

Cleansing the body polity is a challenge that can be safely entrusted to the team led by Narendra Modi and Subramanian Swamy. People trust them and will back them up. 

Be ruthless in bringing to book the habitual offenders and in particular, those who have subverted and decimated the constitutional institutions of the country.

Be compassionate in reaching out to every single citizen in everyone of the 6.5 lakh villages of the nation. 

Start with determination and single-minded purpose with national schemes such as the National Water Grid and international initiatives such as the formation of Indian Ocean Community (Hindu mahasagar parivaar). Just these two initiatives will launch India and the other 50 neighbouring states of India along the Indian Ocean Rim into a path of economic multiplier effect heralding Trans-Asian Highway and Railway projects and harnessing the waters of the great rivers flowing from the greatest water reservoir of the world, the Himalayas. Start the initiative to ensure sustainable waterflows along Mekong, Irawadi, Salween, Brahmaputra, Ganga, Sutlej and manage the project to reach out the waters to every farm, to every household with clean tap water. The National Water Grid for India alone has the potential to create an additional 9 crores of wet land which can be distributed to 9 crore landless families. With assured irrigation, these new lands under new ownership can launch an agrarian revolution of the kind that the world has never seen. The national water grid revolution has the potential to mitigate world hunger by doubling India's agricultural production within the next 5 years.

India has a role in the comity of nations exemplified by what the French epigraphist George Coedes called Hinduised States of Southeast Asia as the title of his monumental work pointing to the role played by India's cultural ambassadors to convey the message of Dharma and Dhamma in organizing peoples' lives in harmonious societies. The greatest Vishnu mandiram of the world, Angkor-Wat should become the epistle of this global effort by starting daily pujas in the temple and involving every citizen of the Indian Ocean Community in a cooperative effort to build United States of Indian Ocean States. as a balance to the splendid initiative which resulted in the European Community.

Some questions are posed as a prelude to the work of Aurobindo called India's rebirth:

What makes India a country unlike any other?
What power can bring about her rebirth?
Today, with the worldwide churning of blood and mud about to smother us, our answer to these questions will decide India's destiny.

India has a destined role in world polity for the simple reason that today India accounts for over 1.25 billion people with a civilizational heritage which has been a beacon of hope and renaissance for many people all around the globe. It is consistent with the ethos of the nation that India has chosen a democratic path involving every single citizen in the life-efforts to realize everyone's true potential.

India's destined role can be realized with dignity and compassion, with determination and a resolve to take the entire continent of Asia forward in tune with the march of the continent in a majestic walk of continental drift moving the Indian subcontinent at the rate of about 6 cms. every year jutting into the European continent and lifting up the Himalayas about 1 cm. every year increasing the accumulated snow and ice. This march has the potential to overcome even the ravages of the Krakatoa super-eruption to provide for a humanised process of building up the comity of nations into a Rastram, a lighted path for social welfare and sustainable environment.

Indian leadership cannot shirk this global responsibility.

A state is but a symbolic form of peoples' efforts at setting up cooperative institutions. The larger canvas is the Rastram, an adhyatmic idea of living in harmony with the environment respecting human dignity and human aspirations with due care to ensure that the world is left a better place to live in for the present and future generations in an equitable world order which existed as of 1CE (See histogram of Angus Maddison). 

This inexorable journey is a pilgrimage. Modi and Swamy are merely the facilitators, the companions guiding the caravans, in a pilgrims' progress from the Indian Ocean to the Himalayas -- aasetu himachalam as the logo of Survey of India says.


S. Kalyanaraman
Sarasvati Research Center
May 11, 2014

Human Security is True ‘Development’ -- M.G.Devasahayam

$
0
0
 Human Security is True ‘Development’
                                                                             M.G.Devasahayam

 Sriperumbudur Parliamentary constituency in Tamil Nadu adjoining Chennai is a ‘developed’ one if the neo-liberal ‘development’ criteria are adopted.  This is the home of some of the state-of-the art ‘infrastructure’ projects, Special Economic Zones and giant MNCs-Motorola, Samsung, Dell, Ford, Hyundai, BMW, Nokia, Saint Gobain, Nissan, Caterpillar to mention a few. But as pre-election surveys show, the locals are left wondering as to what the ‘development’ is all about!  For them the roads are bad, bus services are poor, power cuts are frequent, environment has sharply degraded, water sources are drying up and pollution is on the increase. What is worse, there are hardly any job or income opportunities for the poor. Bereft of ‘human security’ they fall back on the freebies and charity handed down by the state government.
To propitiate such ‘development’ central and state governments extend massive concessions and facilities to these MNCs who in turn pay fabulous salaries to their expatriate managers and are earning profits in billions, most of which is repatriated to their home countries. This is ‘neo-liberal’ development at work! This is true, perhaps in a larger measure to Gurgaon, adjoining Delhi that has morphed in to a ‘monstrous city’. 

At the height of globalisation rampage, late Caroline Thomas, Professor of Global Politics at the University of Southampton wrote a Book ‘Global Governance, Development and Human Security’(Pluto Press-2000). It was well before the warped concepts, ideologies and methodologies that dominated Liberalisation, Privatisation and Globalisation (LPG) made an unrelenting onslaught on the Indian economy due to the predatory policies and practices unleashed by UPA II supposedly under an ‘economist’ Prime Minister. These policies, perceived mostly in a macro and material context related to structural reforms, allocation of natural resources, big-ticket projects, Foreign Investment, GDP growth and world trade. Poverty alleviation was expected to take place as a ‘trickle down’ and spin-off.

 The Book dealt with the “growing inequality and widespread poverty that characterises the era of ‘neo-liberal’ development” and ‘uneven distribution of the benefits of the globalisation process, and the general failure of that process to attend to the human security of the majority of humanity.’ The UPA triumvirate of Sonia Gandhi, Manmohan Singh and Palaniappan Chidambaram had no use for this Book or what is written in it. In the event, by their LPG policies they have created an India of ‘growing inequality, widespread poverty, galloping prices and increasing unemployment.’ For the overwhelming majority prosperity never came, only poverty accelerated. At the hustings they are going to pay for it very dearly.

 At the global level UNDP Report, 1997 describes the ‘uneven distribution of the benefits of the globalisation process’. It depicts a global society bereft of conscience or concern for human suffering and deprivation. While one third of the human race was reeling in poverty and penury, microscopic minority of global population wallowed in opulent wealth and splendour. Subsequently things got worse as ‘global governance’ tightened its grip on the hapless third world nations. In an inhuman system where over one third of world’s population does not have a secure life, harping merely on ‘GDP growth’ and ‘unrestricted world trade’ as the central theme of LPG is indeed perverse and blinkered. This is precisely what happened in India during the last ten years resulting in nearly two-third of the population living in near poverty and penury.

With a new government coming in there is need for a realistic and holistic approach to evaluate the LPG regime of ‘development’ and the system of Governance that went with it and provide a talisman that could measure its effectiveness. ‘Human security’ could be the talisman with individual dignity and poverty reductions as the core theme.

The ‘human security’ talisman makes a fine distinction between ‘income poverty’ and ‘human poverty’. The neo-liberal reforms under LPG regime seek to address only the ‘income poverty’ while virtually ignoring ‘human poverty’. This is what has led to the skewed, unsustainable ‘development’ that has taken place in India. ‘Human security’ is much more than ‘material growth and sufficiency’ [income security] and is described as “a condition of existence in which basic material needs are met and in which human dignity, including meaningful participation in the life of the community, can be met.

 While material sufficiency lies at the core of human security, in addition the concept encompasses non-material dimension to form a qualitative whole. Human security is oriented towards an active and substantive notion of democracy, and is directly engaged with discussions of democracy at all levels, from the local to the global. This is fresh and positive thinking, harnessing four vital elements-material sufficiency, human dignity, democracy and participatory governance- that constitute the core of a civilised human society. One without the other is incomplete and unsustainable.

 In the Indian context a fifth dimension could be added. While the economy is expanding and getting globalised, politics is shrinking and descending from national, regional and state levels to communal/caste/tribal outfits causing tensions and conflicts that never existed before. This phenomenon is taking place primarily because of a growing perception that global and national governance, as being practiced today does not provide adequate human dignity, identity and security.

 It is time ‘human security’ replaced ‘threat’ centered ‘security’, which is the obsession of all countries, big and small. This makes sense because for most people today, a feeling of insecurity arises more from worries about daily life than from the dread of war or any cataclysmic event. Job security, income security, health security, environmental security, security from crime, safety for women-these are the emerging concerns of human security.

 LPG/neo-liberal model of development will never be able to achieve such security because by nature it is exploitative with its very roots in crony capitalism-an economy that is nominally free-market, but works on preferential regulation and other favorable government intervention based on money-power and personal relationshipsThis is what has been in practice in India ever since the LPG era of early nineties.

 The blatant manifestation of this crony capitalism was described the other day by former West Bengal Governor Gopalakrishna Gandhi while delivering the 15th D.P. Kohli Memorial Lecture at the conclusion of the CBI’s year-long Golden Jubilee celebrations: “Corporate greed has crossed all bounds.... We used to talk of black money as a parallel economy and so it continues to be. But Reliance is a parallel State. I do not know of any country where one single firm exercises such power so brazenly, over the natural resources, financial resources, professional resources and, ultimately, over human resources as the company of the Ambanis. From Ambedkar who spoke of economic democracy, to Ambani who represents a techno-commercial monopoly of unprecedented scale, is a far cry indeed.”

This is the kind of ‘parallel state’ that has facilitated one person living in a Rs. 5000 crore mind-boggling mansion in Mumbai with all security money can buy while millions sleep on pavements and in abandoned pipes deprived of even basic safety and dignity.

 Substituting Ambani with Adani is not the solution. India needs to go back to the basics-the economic idea of India envisaged by the Founding Fathers of our Republic. In this ‘idea’, ‘development’ of Independent India would be sui generis, a society unlike any other, in a class of its own that would not follow the Western pattern of mega industrialisation, urbanisation and individuation. India’s would be a people’s economy that would chart out a distinct course in economic development. India would pursue need-based, human-scale, balanced development while conserving nature and livelihoods. In a self-respecting nation every citizen should get the strength, resource and opportunity to stand on their feet and earn his/her livelihood with honour and dignity instead of endlessly depending on corporate trickle-downs and government freebies and charity. God-given resources - land, water, jungle and minerals–belong to the people and these must be managed as such. Only then there would be human security.

The election manifestos unveiled by the political parties come nowhere near this ‘idea’. Congress party talks of ‘internal security’, ‘law & order’ and ‘modernising the police’. It also talks of ‘securing from external threats’ and modernisation of Armed Forces with imported weapons. BJP in addition talks of ‘food security’ and ‘energy security’.

 There is hardly any holistic approach. However General VK Singh, former Chief of Army Staff who joined BJP and contested Parliament elections comes nearer to the ‘idea’ when he said in an interview to Rediff.com: “If you look at national security, it is not just external challenges. National security is external, internal, environmental, economic--anything that affects the health of the nation is national security.”

 Human security is much more than national security. Only when its four vital elements-material sufficiency, human dignity, democracy and participatory governance-coalesce can there be true ‘development’ that would spread prosperity across the board! Will such an era ever dawn on India?

Remembering Haldighati MahaRana on 9 May 2014 -- B. Shantanu

$
0
0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X5MS-2MO6k&list=PL0AD6CB5199844CDF Published on Mar 21, 2013
A short snippet from the discussions at Simrole village, near Indore earlier this month. In this snippet, I respond to the question: "What are you doing (about the sorry state of affairs in the country)?"

An uneven battle, the heroes of Haldighati & forgetting history

9 MAY 2014
Today happens to be an important date in Indian medieval history. It marks the birth of one of India’s true heroes – a man whose life exemplifies valour, courage, fierce pride and self-respect - MahaRana Pratap Singh of Mewar*.
Unfortunately most of us have only the foggiest idea of his exploits, thanks to our “education”.  The MahaRana is largely ignored in the history textbooks of early years in India. Yesterday, as I was browsing the Class VII History Text Book prepared by NCERT, I noticed it did not have any mention of MahaRana Pratap. That’s right. No mention at all. Not a word. Unsurprisingly, no mention of the Battle of Haldighati either, one of the most riveting episodes of his life and struggles.
For an event that spawned a legend in the annals of Rajasthan, the battle of Haldighati was a short affair. Some say, it lasted for barely four hours. The Mughal forces greatly outnumbered MahaRana’s army (as much as 4:1 by some estimates).  Heavily outnumbered, the  Rajputs inflicted heavy casualties on the Mughals before eventually losing the battle. Haldighati proved to be a turning point in the fight against the Mughals by the Rajputs and perhaps the first breakthrough in almost fifty years.
One of the lesser known heroes of Haldighati was the Jhala Sardar, Man Singh.  The story goes that when Jhala Sardar saw his king wounded and his steed faltering, he donned the royal garments (including the Crown and royal emblem) of MahaRana Pratap, thus confusing the enemy and took the entire attack of the Mughal hordes upon himself.
The Jhala Sardar did not live to see the results of his extraordinary courage, but it was his sacrifice that let MahaRana Pratap live for another day and continue his fight against the Mughals, eventually liberating all of Mewar except Chittorgarh.  His descendants in Udaipur still proudly carry the emblem of Mewar as their coat of arms.
The other less-known heroes of Haldighati were the Bhil Adivasis of the Aravallis, whose valour, knowledge of terrain and “intensive arrow showers” made the battle far from one-sided. In recognition of their extraordinary contribution to Rajputana & to protecting these lands, a Bhil stands along-side a Rajput on either side of the Royal Coat of Arms of Mewar.
The Battle of Haldighati was the last pitched battle fought by the MahaRana against the Mughals. But the war was to continue. From his hideouts in the Aravallis, he began a long and debilitating guerilla campaign against the Mughals. The MahaRana’s hatred towards Akbar ran deep – at least partly (if not largely) explained by the ruthless massacre by Akbar of thousands of peasants and artisans that lived within the walls of Chittor after the third seige of the fort in 1567.  Over the next 20-odd years, Akbar planned several campaigns to Rajputana to capture or kill Pratap. They all failed. The MahaRana’s exploits in the ravines and the hard struggle for survival in the wild is the stuff of legends. For several years, he and his family survived on wild berries and by hunting and fishing for food. Legend has it that he even ate chapatis made of grass seeds during those dark days. And it is said he did not sleep on a bed till his very end because of a vow to not rest until Chittor was free from foreign occupation.
I wonder who tells these stories to our children these days? Are they even told about these at school? Does the MahaRana get the treatment and time he deserves or is he dismissed as a Rajput king who fought against the “Great Mughals”? Is there anyone who tells our young what happened…and how the times were back then?
What about history textbooks, you may ask. I looked up one myself.  Instead of stories of valour and pride, what we have are bland sentences, such as, “In the north-east, the Ahoms were defeated in 1663, but rebelled again in the 1680s. …Campaigns against the Maratha chieftain Shivaji were initially successful. But Aurangzeb insulted Shivaji who escaped from Agra, declared himself an independent king and resumed his campaigns against the Mughals…” (Pg 49, Ch 4, Part II, “Our Pasts”)
There are at least two remarkable heroes mentioned right there in the lines above. Sadly Lachit Barphukan is even less familiar to young Indian children than MahaRana Pratap. As for Shivaji being referred to as a “Maratha chieftain”, I will leave it for another day.
What a pity that in a civilization with historical continuity that stretches back to thousands of years, most children grow up indifferent to history; some actually dreading it. Can there be anything more embarrassing?
* According to the Gregorian calendar. According to the Hindu calendar, his birth anniversary is celebrated on the Tritiya (3rd) of Shukla Paksha of Aashaadh. This year falls on 11th June.

http://satyameva-jayate.org/2014/05/09/haldighati-history/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SatyamevaJayate+%28%7C%7C+Satyameva+Jayate+%7C%7C%29

Goofed-up MGNREGA -- Nirmala Sitharaman

$
0
0

How not to run a programme

MGNREGA is beset with failures of planning, execution, monitoring and accountability. 
Written by Nirmala Sitharaman | May 9, 2014 8:02 am

This scheme smacks of the Congress’s disregard for rules and good governance.
MGNREGA is beset with failures of planning, execution, monitoring and accountability.
This election season, we have seen the BJP seeking the people’s mandate on the slogan “sab ka saath, sab ka vikas”. The Congress harps primarily on a “we gave you” list. The first in this list is the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA).
The 11th Five Year Plan recognised that 30 crore people lived below the poverty line. It was felt that the MGNREGA could be an instrument of rapid poverty reduction during this plan period (2007-12). It was designed to provide “…short-term employment on public works to unskilled workers.” The Plan document was clear and specific: “…based on the premise that in areas with high unemployment rates and underemployment… can prevent poverty from worsening during lean periods of seasonal unemployment.”
Through an act of Parliament, this scheme was enforced in 200 districts from February 2, 2006. The first performance audit report by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), covering the year ending March 2007, was readied in 2008. It is not clear if any action was taken on the several specific shortcomings and failures flagged in the report of the CAG. With elections to the Lok Sabha in 2009 clearly in mind, the scheme was expanded to cover all rural districts by April 1, 2008. In brief, it aimed to provide a minimum of 100 days of work to adult members of every household who volunteered. “Such work was to be provided at minimum wage rates, within a radius of 5 km of the village…”
On April 23, 2013, a performance audit of the MGNREGA by the CAG was laid on the table of Parliament. Covering the period April 2007-March 2012, this is the second performance audit report. This report covered 3,848 gram panchayats (GPs) in 28 states and four union territories.
Before we get into the CAG’s observations, it may be relevant to note that the GPs are the principal implementing agency. The scheme emphasised community participation in planning, implementation, social audit and transparency. Emphasis was on labour-intensive works for water conservation, drought- and flood-proofing as priority works to be undertaken. It banned the use of contractors.
In February 2013, the ministry of rural development stated that, up to December 31, 2012, the total actual expenditure on the scheme since its launch is Rs 1,92,322.33 crore. In the budget of 2013-14, another Rs 33,000 crore was allocated for the current fiscal.
As a flagship programme, thanks to political commitment and abundant funds, this scheme ought to have stood out for full preparedness, effective implementation and optimum utilisation by the beneficiaries. These were the worsening years of the UPA’s jobless growth and, given the demand-based nature of seeking work, the MGNREGA would have actually provided the necessary succour to the unskilled rural poor, we would assume.
In reality, the figures show otherwise. The person days of employment generated even for those who sought work has never been a full 100 days. Since 2007-08 till 2011-12, the person days of employment generated is shown here: 42, 48, 54, 47 and 43. In 2012-13, this figure was 44.99, while in the year just ended, 2013-14, person days of employment created is only 42.48.
Only 9.6 per cent of households who demanded employment in 2012-13 availed 100 days of employment. In 2013-14, this figure came down to 6.4 per cent. The CAG, in the latest performance audit, concludes: “[The] MGNREGA guarantees 100 days of wage employment to every rural household willing to take up manual labour… the intended beneficiaries had not been able to fully exercise their rights.” It is a cruel irony that, the CAG observes, “obtaining a job card does not automatically translate into employment when demanded by [the] beneficiary.” Further, the report adds, “widespread instances of non-payment and delayed payment of wages were observed in 23 states.”
There were only half-hearted attempts at monitoring the scheme. The CAG’s observations are unambiguous when it says, “The act makes the ministry legally responsible for monitoring the scheme and giving such directions to the states for its proper implementation. In fact, the act requires the ministry to set up a Central Employment Guarantee Council… it was seen that the Council had done little in terms of monitoring of the scheme. In six years of existence, a few council members conducted just 13 field visits, and the council had not put in place an effective system of monitoring and evaluation, as required under the act.”
Considering that the council worked under the chairmanship of the minister of rural development, it is too serious an indictment for us to ignore!
The CAG minced no words as it found “numerous instances” when the “ministry released grants in excess of demand and in breach of its own conditionalities.” The disregard of laid-out norms was brazen. “In fact, in 2010-11, the ministry relaxed all conditionalities (except furnishing utilisation certificate)… as a result, Rs 1,960.45 crore was released in the month of March 2011 alone, without exercising proper financial controls.” If this was not enough, “An amount of Rs 4,072.99 crore was released by the ministry in 2008-12 to states for use in the subsequent financial year, in contravention of budget provisions and General Financial Rules. Also, excess funds of Rs 2,374.86 crore were released by the ministry to six states due to wrong calculation or without taking note of balances available with the states.”
Unfortunately, that this brazen disregard targeted poverty reduction is also not made out. “Releases made to states… and poverty data showed that… Bihar, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh had 46 per cent of the rural poor in India but accounted for only about 20 per cent of the funds released.”
Key to implementing this scheme are the Gram Rozgar Sahayaks (GRSs). There were not enough GRSs on the field. Their “shortages ranged from 20 to 93 per cent.” It is they who maintain documents, issue job cards, allocate work, pay wages, monitor and facilitate social audits. “Non-maintenance or incorrect maintenance of basic records was noticed in 18-54 per cent of test-checked GPs.” Even from the poorly kept records, it emerges that “works abandoned midway or not completed for a significant period were noticed. Also it was seen that 7,69,575 works amounting to Rs 4,070.76 crore are incomplete, even after one to five years.”
Questions are raised about the lack of durable asset creation: “Cases of diversion of funds for other uses were also seen in a large number of states.”
If only some course correction had been introduced, as action taken, after the first performance audit of the CAG (2007-08), the thorough indictment in the latest report could have been avoided. This scheme smacks of the Congress’s disregard for rules and good governance at every stage: planning, execution, monitoring and accountability.
Campaigning in Amethi, the Congress vice president, Rahul Gandhi, claimed, “I have got information that the BJP and Narendra Modi… intend to abolish welfare legislations like… employment guarantee.” Is he attempting to frighten the poor of this country? Is he covering up for his government’s failure verging on irresponsible governance?
The writer is the BJP’s national spokesperson
  • MNrega is not properly implemented which even PC cannot deny that.If he has the guts let him challenge the CAG report on the performance audit ,utilaisation of funds by independant audit for specified gram Panchayat and show the result to dispute the audit.How the funds were to be utilaised and also the name of the project which is carried out in each panchayat.
      • Avatar
        I wonder if the party, the author is spokesperson of, is any different than the targeted party.
        I'd love to see how BJP fares in the next CAG audit reports - if they don't really abolish this legislation.
          • Avatar
            I agree , as the majority of Gram Pradhans are way entrenched in the system for political benefits/causes .. dont see how BJP can do away with MNREGA - however is it right to think of MNREGA as some sort of Social Security/Unemployment Benefits ?
        http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/how-not-to-run-a-programme/99/

        Modi will move India closer to Japan and China, US expert on Sangh Parivar says

        $
        0
        0

        Modi will move India closer to Japan and China, US expert on Sangh Parivar says



        Some 27 years after it was first published, Dr Walter Andersen's book The Brotherhood of Saffron, co-authored with Shridhar Damle, remains the definitive study of the sangh parivar and its dynamics in India. As a young state department official posted at the US embassy in India, and thereafter holding posts in Foggy Bottom that kept him in the India loop, Andersen has followed the evolution of the RSS and the BJP, including the rise of Narendra Modi, who he first met in Washington DC as a state department guest in the early 1990s. Dr Andersen is Washington's go-to man for matters relating to RSS and BJP, and these are busy days for him. Excerpts from the interview:

        Walk us through Narendra Modi's RSS days, your early recollection of him, and his equation now with the RSS and the BJP's prime ministerial candidate.

        Well, we all know that he comes from a rather poor OBC family. The RSS transformed him even though he had problems with them later. The RSS is a very collegial group and expects you to act in a collegial way. It never emphasizes the individual. And Modi is individualistic. From the organization you have a lot of good workers who have emerged, but you haven't had someone who is charismatic. The RSS damp down on charisma. Modi is an exception. He is charismatic and the organization where he began his political life seems to have accepted it. After he was appointed RSS pracharak in Gujarat, the organization was impressed by the focus and energy he showed in earthquake relief work. He sets objectives and gets the job done. That helped him advance in the organization despite his personality.

        When did you last meet him?

        Last June at Gujarat Bhawan in Delhi. The first meeting was when he came to Washington DC on a state department visitor program in the early 90s. I really didn't think much of him, but then he was part of a group of 10-12 people.

        Do you get the sense that the RSS has distanced himself from him or he has fallen out with RSS? What is their equation?

        Fallen out may be a bit strong. The RSS leadership in Gujarat was not enthused by him, particularly other affiliates like VHP. His relationship with them was cool if not cold. He ran things without vetting it with the RSS; he didn't see the need. He wasn't collegial, which is surprising for a pracharak. They exchange notes and exchange people...he didn't do that.

        Was it different from Vajpayee's style of functioning?

        Vajpayee was the supreme schmoozer. He worked collegially with the RSS. He had a superior relationship because he was elder to its leadership. There's night and day difference.

        How much influence does the RSS wield over the BJP political structure - hasn't there been a progressive dilution ...

        It has been going on for years; it goes on for years. The real dilution was when the BJP was formed and the decision was made to reduce the power the organizing secretary in the new BJP. In the old Jan Sangh it was critical post, manned largely by a pracharak. It is not the pratinidhi sabha, they did not make decision on party politics; it was through the organizing secretary. It was Vajpayee's and Advani's move to reduce influence and power of the organizing secretary. There are comparatively few paracharaks in the BJP now.

        So you expect Modi to continue the policy? This talk of an expansion of the saffron agenda if a BJP-led government comes to power is overblown?

        Absolutely. Much over blown. The fear is just the reverse ... that the RSS as an organization be submerged.

        But some reports say the RSS sees this as a make or break election in terms of pushing its Hindutva agenda.

        You know, it's interesting that the executive leadership of the RSS did not push Modi. This was the first instance of the cadre, the bottom, forcing the leadership to do something. This is also the non-RSS cadre as well. The RSS worries that it will get marginalized. You see it in the much quoted comment of the sarsanghchalak in the pratinidhi sabha 4-5 month ago in which he warns the RSS workers that their the primary duty is toward of the RSS. Why did he come out and say that? He saw them as more interested and more involved in politics.

        Looking back what was the extent of saffronization of India in the six years of BJP-NDA rule?

        There was to some degree. But remember it was a coalition government, and you have to keep in mind Susan and Lloyd Rudolph's thesis that any group that comes to power in a country as socially complex as India has to move toward the ideological center. It it does not it will not come to power or stay in power. You saw that with the Vajpayee administration also. It did not push any Hindu nationalist issue. They wouldn't have kept their allies had they done so.

        So it will be the same with Modi?

        We can only judge from his campaign. One of the Indian newspapers I think counted his use of the world development versus use of the word Hindutva. It was like 500 to one or two. The question is how will he keep the radicals, the right wing of the party in check.

        A number of people think he is the right wing.

        I don't think they know him.

        Coming to economics, how does one reconcile the RSS plank of swadeshi economics with the reform-drive agenda of Modi or the so-called Gujarat model?

        They are going to have an issue with that. AS the party has grown it has gotten more complex. If you have a person who is as development oriented as Modi, and who admires (Jagdish) Bhagwati and (Arvind) Panagariya...and they him ... there will definitely be some problems with the swadeshi brigade of Gurumurthy and co.

        What will be the nature of Modi's ties with US and vice-versa in the backdrop of the visa flap? Is he the kind who will harbor a grudge?

        Hindu nationalism in India always had a look east policy. It goes back a long way. When I met Modi, the one country he mentioned was Japan. He has already been to Japan and China and will look for significant investment from there. Not that he will ignore the US, but if I had to make a guess as to the first country he will visit, it will be japan.

        Doesn't sound like good news to Washington ...

        I don't think he is going to ignore US but this is not what his focus is going to be. Ii is not an unimportant country and there are strategic issues at play. He is not unaware of it. It will be an interesting balancing act.

        What about the stability of a Modi-led BJP/NDA government if it comes to power? How will the old guard in the party who have been sidelined take it? And will Modi's peers who don't particularly like him be an alternative center of power? In many ways they sound like the Congress party, with rebels, dissidents etc.

        The past few months have shown that he is taking control of the party. He is a smart guy. He will appease the old guard with public honors etc but will keep all the power himself. He is his own person and will run things, unlike Vajpayee, who was very collegial. Well, the younger lot each had a chance and he came out ahead. If he becomes PM I expect that will end. So far nobody has left and nobody is badmouthing him.

        So no alternate center of power?

        Maybe if he makes some egregious mistakes on the economic front or foreign policy front - and that too in part because there is an enormous sense of expectation.

        So he's no the team of rivals kind of guy, is he?

        No, he's not. He doesn't like rivals.
        http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/stoi/all-that-matters/Modi-will-move-India-closer-to-Japan-and-China-US-expert-on-Sangh-Parivar-says/articleshow/34947622.cms

        National Technology Day, Pokharan Test 11 May 1998. Renew the pledge. NaMo, announce Thorium-nuke doctrine. Resume tests.

        $
        0
        0

        See: http://bharatkalyan97.blogspot.in/2014/03/indias-nuclear-doctrine-update-announce.html 

         

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irtrpk9m0OU 

        Atal Bihari Vajpayee on Pokhran Test Published on Aug 24, 2012

        On 18 May 1974, India exploded its first nuclear device in an operation code named Smiling Buddha (Pokhran-I). After about a quarter century, on 11 May 1998, Operation Shakti (Pokhran-II) was carried out; Shakti was the codename for the nuclear devices that were detonated. The term Shakti (Hindi: शक्ति) refers to the cosmic energy of Hinduism.

        Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan, Jai Vigyan: CM Blogs on National Technology DayShare on stumbleupon

        Author: Narendra Modi
        May 11, 2013
        Dear Friends,
        11th May 1998- this is the day when India scripted a new chapter in its history and gave out a strong message to the world and to all those who questioned our credentials as a nation all set to make the transition to the next century as an emerging Superpower. It was on this day 15 years ago that India conducted Nuclear Tests in Pokhran, Rajasthan. As honorable Atal ji announced the success of the tests, an entire nation rejoiced. From Kashmir to Kanyakumari, from Maharashtra to Manipur, there was a feeling of pride amongst every Indian. Even the Indian community spread across the world erupted with joy!
        To commemorate these historic tests, 11th May is celebrated as National Technology Day. I extend my best wishes and greetings to all my fellow countrymen and especially the scientist community on this momentous day.
        The tests of 11th May 1998 were possible both due to the stellar work of our scientists and the strong leadership India was blessed with at that point of time. The tests were a victory of technology- to develop such a programme with requisite secrecy is truly a commendable effort. No mention of Pokhran 1998 is complete without extolling the pioneering efforts of our scientists.
        Most importantly, tremendous courage was shown by the then Government, headed by respected Atal ji to take the decision of conducting the tests. The BJP-led Government had not even completed two full months in office and yet, on the auspicious day of Buddha Purnima (11th May 1998), the Government took the bold step of testing and making India immensely proud.
        After the 11th May 1998 tests, the world community was not amused. They immediately put sanctions on India and tried to isolate us from the world stage. Yet, in only two days, on 13th May 1998, we tested again! More strength was needed to test two days after the first test in an international climate that was not very favourable and this only shows what a strong leadership can do!
        When the tests were conducted the nation was ecstatic. But what even a matter of great joy and pride is that the Vajpayee Government ensured that the sanctions do not affect India’s development journey in any way. Such was Honorable Atal ji’s and the Government’s strategy on foreign and diplomatic issues that those nations that were opposed to India testing, gradually developed strong relations with India again. Atal ji won back India’s friends at the world stage yet there was no compromise on principles and national interest. Our inherent strength shined and we moved ahead without any damage to our economy. This was very much a test of our political will and needless to say, we passed the test with flying colours.
        Today, on the 15th anniversary of the Pokhran tests, there is a crucial question that we have to answer- how do we become self-sufficient in defence manufacturing? This is not only about military power but also about being self reliant for our own defence equipment. After over 65 years of Independence, why must we still spend thousands of crores of rupees to procure defence equipment from overseas? This is a challenge for our youth, talent pool, scientists- how we can combine our strengths and make India sufficient in defence related manufacturing!
        We should think of a larger debate, encourage free flowing of ideas to think of how India can develop human resources in defence manufacturing. Can we create an ecosystem to strengthen our manufacturing? Going a step ahead, we should even think of how we can export defence equipment?
        In Gujarat we have made a small effort in this regard. In our engineering colleges we are working towards starting subjects related to defence manufacturing. At the 2013 Vibrant Gujarat Global Summit we organized the ‘International Conference on Defence Offsets’ where there was a very healthy exchange of thoughts and ideas on this field.
        Once again, I greet my fellow countrymen on National Technology Day. Let us remember the spirit of Pokhran, celebrate technology and use it to further strengthen our Nation. I am also sharing a video of Atal ji where he talks about the relevance and success of the Pokhran tests.
        Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan Jai Vigyan!
        Narendra Modi
        TusharMAPatel
        • May 11, 2014Jai Jawan, Jai Kishan, Jai vigyan, Mera desh mahan.Bharat mataki jai
        • Mahak SinghSeptember 12, 2013jai jewan jai kisan deash hemara hindustan
        • Vijaya RaoJuly 8, 2013Anyone can become a politician but only a few can become leaders…. It needs honesty, inner strength, courage, conviction and deep rooted Indian values to become a leader of this nation… Indian public is getting tired of the quality of politicians of today… Modiji is a proving to be a ray of hope in many fields… It’s time India gets him as her leading man.
        • balatokyoJune 17, 2013Shri modiji right now our nation’s defence industry and political leadership who want to give morale to our great brave jawansare in a very sad state.Shri modiji under your leadership i believe not only strengthen the defence industry, but also strengthen the morale by your strong leadership.Because in your younger days you have the great experince.
        • Samiksha ChoithaniMay 15, 2013I fully agree with you sir. To test needs more political will. It was courage of then Govt to do same. I also agree that we need to stand on our own feet in defence issues. JAI JAWAN JAI VIGYAN!
        • asha.lalwaniMay 15, 2013This was boldest decision of Atal ji to make India known to the world. After Atal ji we see this personality and leadership in you. I am sure Indian will become superpower and we can fulfill Atal ji’s dream
        • http://www.narendramodi.in/jai-jawan-jai-kisan-jai-vigyan-cm-blogs-on-national-technology-day/


        1. निश्चित हार देख दार्शनिक बने नीतीश pic.twitter.com/btuB62tQqX
          View image on Twitter
        2. But the game is not yet over. No room for complacency till the last vote is cast and counted.
        3. Could you cite some other elections where candidates joined rival parties and when they returned tickets?
        4. BJP's campaign is a sum of high planning, sincere effort, intelligent direction, skillful execution and strong leadership.
        5. The Campaign Diary - 11th May, 2014: http://on.fb.me/1gpcEyq 
        6. Make this day special for your mothers and remember she knows you Nine Months longer than the rest of the World:) Salute to the all Mothers!
        7. Or, she got it done as sarkari kharcha or got free services from God knows whom?
        8. When Sonia Gandhi accuses Modiji of using money in campaigning, I wonder she does it on her own as they say she being sixth richest.
        9. For the first time in electoral history of India so many people got addressed by one leader.
        10. The issue is that of popular fervor and not that of relative merits.
        11. 1.1857 2. Vande Mataram Movement/ Anti-partition of Bengal 3. Gandhi-led freedom movements 4. JP-led Sampoorn Kranti 5. Ayodhya movement.
        12. As if these elections are being fought by people. Reminded of only 5 phases of such popular fervor against those in power in Indian history.
        13. Most intense mass mobilization by BJP and Modiji in contemporary world. Apex of hard work a democratic leader can put in.
        14. Also sharing my speech at International Conference on Defence Offsets during last year's Vibrant Gujarat Summit http://nm4.in/WS4rIv 
        15. Our Scientists are our strength and will help shape our future in this Knowledge Era with both Defence and Civilian Impact.
        16. Today, we should think on how India can become self-sufficient in defence manufacturing. How can we strengthen R&D in defence sector.
        17. NDA's foreign policy also ensured that those nations opposed to India testing gradually developed strong ties with India in various fields.
        18. Tests of 1998 were a victory of technology & the nation's willpower. Our scientists worked very hard to develop Nuclear Programme.
        19. Sharing my last year's Blog that contains portions of Atal ji's historic speech of 1998 http://nm4.in/YADSN0

        Psecularatti cuddling terror outfits -- Balbir Punj

        $
        0
        0

        PSEUDO-SECULARISTS ARE NOW ON THE BACKFOOT

        Monday, 12 May 2014 | Balbir Punj 
        By acknowledging that terror organisations recruit from Azamgarh in Uttar Pradesh, BJP leader Amit Shah has called a spade a spade. But jihadi apologists have not been able to stomach this
        The well established fact that terror organisations like the Indian Mujahideen find many recruits from Azamgarh does indeed justify the reference to this Uttar Pradesh town as the ‘face of terrorism’ — much like in the public perception, Agra is city of the Taj or Varanasi, the abode of Lord Vishwanath.
        The Congress, the Samajwadi Party and others political outfits that have attacked BJP leader Amit Shah for labeling Azamgarh a ‘terror hub’, should clarify if they are with those who condemn terrorism or if they are one of those who ignore national interests and capitulate before the terror-tainted for the sake of a handful of votes.
        One Congress spokesperson lamented that the fact that Azamgarh is the largest foreign exchange earner in Uttar Pradesh is never mentioned in the media. In response, one can only wish good luck to all those young boys from Azamgarh who have to face the challenges of working in the Gulf countries so as to send some money home.
        However, we must also ask why the hard-working Azamgarh boys in the Gulf have had to leave their hometown in the first place.
        Also, we need to ask some hard questions about why the Azamgarh’s Muslim community, from which the Indian Mujahideen picks its foot soldiers, does not take any steps to stop this trend. Why does it not expose those who come to head-hunt for terrorists?
        It is not the election discourse alone that has exposed the problems in Azamgarh. For several years now, investigating agencies have traced terror activities across the country back to this town in Uttar Pradesh. The Batla House encounter is just one example.
        This brings us to the next questions: When many in Azamgarh find jobs in the Gulf and the people of the town know that this road to riches is open, why is it that some Muslim youths prefer to take to the gun and bomb culture? What kind of role do community leaders have in this phenomenon? Are some youths brainwashed to romance terror in the name of religion or are they themselves sympathetic  to the cause of terrorists?
        In fact, these are questions that should also be fielded at Mr Shah’s critics. What has the Congress’s Digvijaya Singh and the Samajwadi Party’s Mulayam Singh Yadav done to turn the tide of Indian Muhajideen recruiters in Azamgarh?
        Every time there is a counter-terror police raid or law enforcement agencies act on confidential information about a terror plot, these ‘honourable’ men rush to Azamgarh and shed copious tears — the many efforts of the investigative agencies be damned.
        This same set of self-styled secularists also issue regret statements when a terror attack happens and a large number of innocent men, women and children are killed. They even accuse the police of not being able to shut down terror modules in advance. How is this double talk be allowed when it clearly hurts national counter-terror efforts?
        The Samajwadi Party supremo has chosen to pitch his electoral tent in Azamgarh so as to gain sympathy votes. His plan of action includes accusing security agencies of hunting down the innocents. Ironical, he is the tallest leader of his party which rules Uttar Pradesh, and his Government is committed to ensuring a terror-free environment across the State.
        In other words, Mr Yadav has the authority to stop innocents from being hauled up by the police and his party-led Government has enough clout to see that militant operatives are flushed out of their safe houses. Yet, he uses neither to good effect. Instead, Mr Yadav leaves the people exposed to a debilitating bomb culture even as  Indian Muhajideen recruiters run amok across his State.
        Mr Yadav, in fact, competes  with Mr Singh and other Congress leaders to commiserate with the Muslim community and issue public statements endorsing the claim that those arrested in the aftermath of a terror attack, are all innocents. In contrast, the BJP’s Mr Shah has chosen to set the facts straight about the Indian Mujahideen recruiting from among the Muslims of Azamgarh for the past several years. Who then is the real culprit in this case?
        Ostensibly to get minority votes in bulk (although this conventional wisdom has been challenged in recent years), the Congress, the Samajwadi Party, the Bahujan Samaj Party and the Trinamool Congress have been aggressively targeting the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi.
        In the process they are ignoring the rising tide of Islamist ideology and the danger that it poses to the nation.
        For those who are want the Election Commission to take action against Mr Shah because he has had the audacity to call a spade a spade, must also inform the public what they have done or intending to do to fight Islamist jihadi ideology, the seeds of which are being freely sown in Azamgarh and elsewhere around the country.
        Those who perpetually deny the dangers of Islamist ideology are clinging to the illusion that appeasement of jihadists will somehow make jihadi terror go away. Unfortunately, the civilisational threat produced by these misconceptions is not illusory at all.
        Indeed, the reality of this was sharply etched into world history by the set of determined jihadis who destroyed the twin towers and killing over 3,000 people in America. They played their card again in Mumbai a few years later, indiscriminately gunning down hundreds of innocent people.
        The link between these terror groups, their handlers and financiers may not be evident to the likes of Mr Singh and Mr Yadav — who may have chosen to close their eyes to it — but hopefully these leaders will be able to read what Muhammad Atta, the leader of the gang that destroyed the Twin Towers in 2001, wanted to be written on his grave: “I don’t want any woman to go to my grave during my funeral or on any other occasion thereafter.”
        May be the Congress and Samajwadi Party leaders will hail Mohammed Atta for his bravery too, just as they still maintain that the Azamgarh plotters who were eliminated by Delhi Police in the Batla House encounters are all martyrs.

        http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/edit/pseudo-secularists-are-now-on-the-backfoot.html

        Hindu lobby -- U Mahesh Prabhu. India national lobby -- Kalyan

        $
        0
        0
        Justice Kuldip Singh. a Sikh retired judge of the Supreme Court said in a public address in 1999, - "India is secular because wherever, whenever 10 Indians sit, 8 of them are Hindus".

        Secularism in Indian polity simply means, India first. Nationalist fervor is the hall-mark of Narendra Modi's campaign for a resurgent India.

        Relax, Economist. Mind your own goofed-up European economy and do not meddle in the body polity of India.

        Kalyanaraman

        Hindu Lobby
        U Mahesh Prabhu

        'In a country that prides itself on its religious diversity and its secular constitution, may see the rise of Modi and his pro Hindu agenda as a terrifying chapter of intolerance. They say he is dangerous fire brand and too comfortable inciting the politics of hatred and violence.' States Sam Dolonick in his article published in the recent issue of 'The Economist'. Besides holding Narendra Modi solely responsible for the riots of 2002 he also makes the baseless and completely concocted allegation that 'The RSS was influenced by 1930s German fascism."

        It's not that he doesn't acknowledge the unparalleled achievements of Gujarat Chief Minister. In fact he does when he says 'Modi has attracted more than 20% of the India's total investment of $69 billion last year' but he makes a foul attempt of trying to make it irrelevant by adding 'But despite his achievement, for may of India's 1.1 billion people – 14 per cent of who are Muslims – Modi will always be defined by the anti-Muslim violence…' The 'cause of hate' against Modi is, frankly speaking, owing to his Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) background, the organization which is today whipping boy of the mainline media and, so called, 'secular' organizations.

        'The Economist says is influenced by the Fascist ideology. Need I say how concocted is this idea, i.e. of RSS being influenced by Fascist? Absolute bunk! RSS is, in fact, in response to the brutal history of Islamic Conquest, that which American Historian Mr. Will Durant called 'the bloodiest in history'. The current aspersions against the RSS mostly by the media, Congress and Communist followers to the effect that it is a 'communal organization, most dangerous to the country than even communism' are a complete travesty of fact.

        The Ideology of Hindutva which is propounded by the RSS, and followed by Modi, offers a room for all minorities on a condition of their whole hearted submission to the supreme value of the nation in their lives. The nation is a vehicle of universal truths and is not an entity above them. This is no chauvinist nationalism of the kind associated with Mussolini or Hitler. It teaches loyalty and devotion to the national society in the national homeland under the image of the mother. The unity and solidarity of the motherland taught to claim the highest sacrificial devotion from the citizen body.

        Whoever enters into this spirit of devotion to the nation as a spiritual unity of the land and people are Indians or Hindus in essence. The mental commitment should be final and supreme. The Muslims and Christians have perfect freedom of worship, so long as they do not destroy and undermine the faith and symbolism of the national society. They should subordinate their exclusive claims for final and sole revelation vis-à-vis the national society. They could bear witness to their faith in life and speech but they should not indulge in any unfair and unspiritual modes of conversions. The national identity requires that the whole of the national society, including minorities, should share in the best values of the past. They should appreciate national Dharma – the code of ethical principles and ways of life. The cultural history, they should all give their mind and hearts whole-heartedly to an appreciation of the best types.

        Rama and Krishna may be appreciated by non-Hindus as secular examples while the Hindus will see them as full spiritual exemplars, or avatars. Now considering this ideology, I wonder as to what is so 'dangerous' about it, so as to look at it dangerous than communism? I would be delighted if the people who put in such allegation help me to understand. Be that as it may. Let's consider the following case: In the late 1980s, Abdul Latif was the underworld king of Gujarat. Later, he became Dawood Ibrahim's business manager in the state and was one of criminal dons to make what now seems to be the shameless transition from organized crime to terrorism. Latif was also the suspect in the Mumbai blasts case of 1993; the RDX and other explosive devices for that operation landed, remember, on the Gujarat coast. In November 1997, Latif was killed in an encounter with the Ahmadabad police.

        Many of the Latif's cohorts were put under watch. One of them was his driver, apparently responsible for, in one daring move,hiding a huge cache of weapons meant for terrorist groups. This was part of the consignment that had arrived before Mumbai blasts of 1993. Latif was under surveillance so his driver had hidden the arms in a well in his (the driver's) native village near Ujjain. The driver eventually faced over 50 cases including some under the National Security Act; He was arrested at various stages, by the Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh police, but avoided conviction. When not facilitating terror networks, he was engaged in extortion rackets in Rajasthan, acting almost certainly on behalf of others. His principals, the police believe, may be linked to terror funding groups. The Latif's driver's name was Sohrabuddin Sheikh. Yes this was the same Sohrabuddin for whose encounter Modi was being scrutinized by his political rivals and the media. 'A nationalist is being harassed for having exterminated a terrorist!' by the media that calls itself 'secular' and 'nationalist'.

        What a pity. If you may observe in detail of the propaganda carried on by the Media in Gujarat and in other part of the world, at the same time, you would find that: While Dr. Haneef, a doctor who flew from Glasgow in UK to Australia under mysterious circumstances, and who was arrested by the Australian authorities was given such a terrific support by the media as if they were convinced and simply wanted to convince the world that he wasn't a terrorist. It may be noted that simply because he was allowed to return to India on benefit of doubt the media almost declared his victory as theirs, before even he was tried in the court of law. Our Prime Minister, Mr. Manmohan Singh, went on record to say that he 'lost his sleep' for Haneef. On contrary to this when ethnic Hindus in Malaysia made a peaceful demonstration against the destruction of their temples by pro-Islamic-fundamentalist regime and were sabotaged ruthlessly and put to jail, our very own Karunanidhi's grievances, put forth the Central Government, were simply brushed aside, he was asked to lay off the issue rather ruthlessly. Media made little publicity of the issue. When it\'s a question of Hindus getting unfair treatment in a Muslim majority region, the 'civil, sophisticated and articulate' Muslim intellectuals take refuge in the statement that it's a matter concerning a foreign country. But when it\'s a question regarding a cartoon or a fatwa for beheading a writer, they say - we are a global Ummah, anything happening anywhere to Muslims is our common concern! All big lies and a bigger hypocrisy traded in the name of a religion. So much for their hypocrisy! But why is it so? Let's go in to a bit detail. When Muslims are in trouble there is a cry of intolerance from the whole of the Islamic world led by the Arabs.

        The Pope cries foul when there is problem facing Christians. Communists in India are supported by their comrades in China. But why is it that none cries or express even a word of concern when Hindus are in trouble? Today thousands of Kashmiri pundits, who were driven out of their homes by Jihadi Muslims after torturing them and even raping the women, are living as refugees in their own country. No media cares for them. Instead more special privileges are given to the Kashmir as an incentive and they continue to play lame politics of 'Azad Kashmir' (read Independent Kashmir) with Indian Government. Our forces who risk their lives are blamed and abused for unproven allegations. Recently, in Kashmir, an Army Jawan was stripped off and made to walk nude in the public for attempting to rape a woman.

        Is it so? Then why is it that the same people were sitting so silently when those terrorists were killing and raping their people? Why didn't they ever boycotted them and gave a similar treatment? Why doesn't a Maulvi, anywhere in India, issue a fatwa against a Jihadi terrorist? No answers. But that is understandable. The pure hypocrisy, of the Muslim Clergy and Politicians, is the answer. But why is the media sitting mum? Why aren't they speaking? Have you ever thought of a reason? I did. The reason is because Hindus don't have a strong Lobby of their own. If you take the case of Israel, you will find that though it is a small land they continue to live against all odds surrounded by their enemies from all the directions with rightful support of Americans. Americans are under obligation to support Israel because Jews, who also form a majority in Israel, control American Economy.

        Palestinians though haven't been anywhere successful to have a worthwhile economy for themselves and having spend six decades in building a legacy of hatred and violence continue to gain 'sympathy' and 'support' from the Media as a result of the financial expenditure by the Arab Lobby Supported by Arab Nations. When Christians are persecuted in Pakistan Pope cries foul and American along bring in their pressure to put a halt on it. But what is the case with Hindus? Who are they to look for? As Arabs for the Muslims, Vatican for the Christian and Israel for the Jews who is for Hindus? It's sad but true that Hindus have none to look far. The only Hindu country, Nepal, is today under the clutches of Communists, with its King virtually in exile. India has, what it is proudly called, a 'Free Press' that which is run by private organization without governmental controls. We have series of Television News Channels in various languages. And not a single one ever clarifies its source of income. They never specify who funds them in their websites do they? Yet they have with them millions of dollars. Where did this money come from? You must agree with me that a majority of funding comes from international sources. But why would any organization invest in a media organization? Yes it would be for profitability, if you say it just like that. But there is more than profitability, don't you think? Every journalist has with him/her an inclination towards the Arab or the American or the European world. Don't they? Isn't it possible then that they also subscribe to ideologies of that part of the world? Certainly they will, and beyond doubt. So if they have with them an ideological inclination then it is very much possible that they would have hardly any chance to criticize those people who are of interest to their principals. So when you have so many Medias everyone is certain to have one kind of the ideology or the other, except Hindu, represented. Thus the only favorite whipping boy available is the RSS and its allied organizations. Isn't it so? So there you are. These different lobbies have a phenomenal financial power. The Jews gain their financial power, as said before, through the various business enterprises that are vital for American Economy including the press. Jews are said to be controlling the American Economy virtually.

        Muslim Lobby led by Arabs gain their financial muscle through petro economy, where billions of dollars are earned by them almost without any efforts and also invested in Global Terrorist endeavors. Since true journalistic spirits exists hardly anywhere in the modern day, media corporations are exclusively concentrated on financial profitability. Given this it's not a great deal to make these Lobbies to run the propaganda of their kind in their supported Medias. And given there isn't any Lobby for the Hindutva faction; they are to be the easy target of such propaganda. Won't you agree? This is high time for Hindus to organize an internationally influential Hindu Lobby. Do you think that it is difficult to form one? Certainly not! Consider this: When NDA government had organized 'Pravasi Bharatiya Divas' there were so many Non Resident Indians, most of whom were Hindus who had expressed their interest to be of some use to their land. When, after Pokharan II, India was showered with various international sanctions, let us never forget it was our fellow NRI's who came to the rescue by subscribing to Yashwanth Sinha's, then Finance Minister's, Resurgent India Bonds. Before NDA regime was over India had with it a Foreign Exchange in excess of $100 billion. Doesn't this portray the willingness of our Diaspora? The only thing that would be needed is desire, first, followed by unrelenting determination. Simply put 'Creating a Pro Hindu Lobby is not an option… but a sheer necessity.'

        The author is the Editor-in-Chief of Aseemaa: Journal for National Resurgence.

        Patriotic Tweeters who managed Modi war room. Abki baar, PT hunkaar.

        $
        0
        0
        Gaurav Choudhury and Moushumi Das Gupta, Hindustan Times
        New Delhi, May 11, 2014
        On the outside, the placid Lutyens bungalow on corner of a leafy Delhi lane betrays no signs of the frenzy inside.

        The BJP’s ‘advertising and publicity war room’ — makeshift cabins on the back lawns of 1, Lodhi Estate — functions like a 60-seater real-time, off-shore back office where the party’s campaign strategies and poll slogans are penned, videos are conceived and produced by a 35-member team of professionals who have studied in the world’s top universities and left lucrative jobs. It is overseen by a core group of top leaders including Arun Jaitley, Amit Shah, Sudhanshu Trivedi, Sushma Swaraj and Piyush Goyal.

        “We are playing a role in the making of this history. That keeps us going,” said Hitesh S Barot, 37, a senior intellectual property counsel who worked with multinationals such as Intel and GE India, and quit his regular job to volunteer for the campaign team. Barot had studied engineering and law at the University of California, Berkley.

        In January, inside one of its rooms of the war room, a core group of the BJP’s top strategists went back and forth over which catchphrase to choose as the election slogan.

        Top BJP leaders and a couple of independent corporate and brand strategists initially brainstormed over two slogans: “Desh ki pukaar/ BJP sarkar” and the “Is baar/ Modi sarkar”.

        Read: Inside Amit Shah's 'social media war room', election activities are monitored in UP

        Neither got everybody’s spontaneous nod. Then Ajay Singh, Spicejet co-founder, supposedly made a spur-of-the-moment proposal, pitching for the now famous “Ab Ki Baar/ Modi Sarkar” in a late night conference call.
        The party strategists then decided to go through their hard data once again. They found that Modi’s brand recall value was 20% more than that of the party he was to lead.

        That statistic, an insider says, sealed the case for what is now the BJP calling card in these make-or-break elections, setting in motion the party’s frenetic media blitz planned, conceptualised and executed by a team of under-40 professionals, most of them who have taken a sabbatical or left well-paying regular jobs.

        “Just after Modi’s Varanasi rally ended on May 8 evening, we were asked to create an ad using the rally footage. The ad was ready by 3 am. By 6 pm next day, the film went on air,” said Hemang Jani, 35, an alumnus of National University of Singapore, who left his job with a multinational consulting firm to join this team.

        “We want to remain the party’s behind-the-scenes media team,” says Banuchandar Nagarajan, 34, who studied public policy at Harvard and worked with World Bank before joining the team.

        Read: Virtual war rooms - Parties turn to social media to reach voters

        The decision to set up a “war room” of this mandate was taken in October, barely a month after Narendra Modi was anointed as the BJP’s Prime Ministerial-candidate, although the actual campaigning work began only in January.

        “Negotiations for buying space also started around this time,” said another team member Debojo Maharshi, who runs a Delhi based software firm.
        After the zeroing on the principal slogan — Ab Ki Baar, Modi Sarkar — the party lined up a star-studded team of advertising professionals including Ogilvy & Mather’s Piyush Pandey, renowned lyricist Prasoon Joshi and media planning veteran Sam Balsara of Madison World.

        Soho Square, a subsidiary of O&M and Madison World were put on the job to prepare the  narrative around the slogan and plan out detailed media planning strategy, respectively, for broadcast, print, radio and digital spaces.

        Insiders say it was Pandey who came up with the now famous ‘Achchhey din aane wale hain’, while Joshi penned the party anthem ‘Saugandh’.
        “We made 10 ad films in less than 72 hours, which in itself is a big achievement,” said Raj Kumar Jha, of Soho Square, a multi-linguist with fluency in 16 languages. Jha, like many others, are housed out of the “war-room”.

        Strategists fanned out across the country to oversee the media plan. “I was intimidated and threatened by rival party workers while carrying out the print and electronic media campaign in the north east,” said Shantanu Kalita, a software consultant, who has also served the BJP in earlier election campaigns.

        Read: 30,000 saffron soldiers take up Narendra Modi's fight
        Full coverage: My India My Vote
        http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/1218001.aspx?s=p
        Viewing all 11035 articles
        Browse latest View live


        <script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>