China been successful in establishing its presence in ports around India including Chittagong in Bangladesh, Sittwe and Coco Island in Myanmar, Hambantota in Sri Lanka and Gwadar in Pakistan, which gives it capability to stay close to Indian waters from all sides in a move known as "string of pearls".
See: https://sites.google.com/site/indianoceancommunity1/Home
China flexes muscle in Indian Ocean, Navy concerned
PTI | May 13, 2013, 07.57 PM IST
NEW DELHI: Increasing presence of the Chinese maritime forces in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) and disciplinary issues in the force are expected to be discussed by the top Navy brass in their commanders' conference starting on Tuesday.
The Navy has been concerned over the increasing presence of Chinese navy's submarines and other warships in the IOR. In a recent report submitted to the defence ministry, the Integrated Defence Staff headquarters had informed the government quoting the data by American agencies that 22 encounters of Chinese submarines have taken place outside its territorial waters in the IOR.
China has also been successful in establishing its presence in ports around India including Chittagong in Bangladesh, Sittwe and Coco Island in Myanmar, Hambantota in Sri Lanka and Gwadar in Pakistan, which gives it capability to stay close to Indian waters from all sides in a move known as " string of pearls".
In the conference to be inaugurated by defence minister AK Antony, the Navy will also discuss cases of indiscipline faced by the force.
In recent times, several Navy officers have faced allegations of wife swapping and stealing the affection of brother officer's wife.
One senior officer posted on-board prestigious INS Virat aircraft carrier was dismissed by the force for sending lewd messages to several women using multiple SIM cards and mobile phones.
The top brass of the force is also expected to discuss the delay in the induction of the aircraft carrier INS Vikramaditya, which is being retrofitted in Russia and has been delayed due to mishaps in its boiler.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/China-flexes-muscle-in-Indian-Ocean-Navy-concerned/articleshow/20032323.cms
Fearing China, India pulls out of war games with US, Japan
Shishir Gupta & Pramit Pal Chaudhuri, Hindustan Times New Delhi, May 13, 2013
Concerned at how it would be perceived by Beijing, India last month suddenly withdrew from the planning of a naval exercise with the US and Japanese navies off the US Pacific island of Guam.
Instead, India will stick to geopolitically less sensitive separate naval manoeuvres with the US and Japan.
US and Japanese naval officials visited India last month to discuss coordination for the trilateral exercise.
The Indian defence ministry first indicated a preference for holding the exercise off the coast of the Japanese island of Okinawa.
Then it took the view that war games should be kept to the bilateral level for the time being in deference to Chinese sensibilities. The ministry then withdrew from the discussion altogether.
"Bizarrely, the US and Japan discussed a naval exercise on Indian soil that India was boycotting," said a US defence consultant.
Beijing claims multilateral naval exercises between India, the US and Japan are aimed at containing its influence and has publicly warned all the governments against joining such exercises.
Australia's withdrawal from the Quad after 2007 was a fallout of these protests.
The US and Japan had hoped to give the Malabar label to the Guam exercises, echoing the 2009 Malabar naval actions.
Tokyo saw this as paving the way to recreating the so-called "Quad" naval exercise of 2007 which saw five navies participate.
Australia last year indicated its interest in rejoining. Indian officials say that they are only interested in bilateral naval exercises and that Malabar should be confined to exercises with the US in the Indian Ocean.
This year's Malabar exercise, if held at all, will be a bare bones Indo-US affair in the Arabian Sea later in November. Officials say even this may not happen as both governments keep pushing the date back.
"The dates of Malabar are still to be finalised and depends on the commitments of the Fifth Fleet's engagement in the Gulf," said an Indian Navy official.
The Indian withdrawal from the trilateral exercise occurred before the Chinese border intrusion in eastern Ladakh.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Fearing-China-India-pulls-out-of-war-games-with-US-Japan/Article1-1059257.aspx
Border conflict stirs old resentments over ‘incursions’ in Indian media
Global Times | 2013-5-13 20:38:01
By Liu Zongyi
The Sino-Indian border is heating up again. A "tent confrontation" between the Chinese army and the Indian army has been continuing near the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
From an Indian perception, the Chinese army has invaded Indian territory, and this time is the most serious invasion in the past 25 years. Some Indian media outlets claim China has invaded Indian territory 600 times in the past three years.
The Sino-Indian border issue is very complicated, and even resulted in war in 1962.
That conflict became the excuse for India to bolster the military and develop nuclear weapons. The root reason for so many "incursions" is that the two sides have not reached a consensus on the LAC, let alone a formal border.
However, since 1993, China and India have signed two agreements and one protocol on the maintenance of peace and tranquility and confidence-building measures in the border areas, and have set up a working mechanism for consultation and coordination on border affairs.
These efforts have helped ensure durable peace and stability in the region. There is a very small possibility that China and India will fall into serious conflict.
Nevertheless, bilateral relations between China and India are very delicate. As well as the boundary problem, China-Pakistan relations, the Dalai Lama issue, and tension over water resources also hinder the promotion of China-India relations. These problems mean India has a deep-seated distrust of China.
With the US "rebalancing" toward the Asia-Pacific, the Sino-Indian relationship is seeing subtle changes these days.
Some Indian scholars trumpet an alliance under US leadership to counterbalance China. For example, Harsh V. Pant, a professor of defense studies at King's College London, argues that India's strategic interests can only be realized by an Asia-Pacific arrangement where the US retains its predominant status, while Indian Express columnist C. Raja Mohan advocates that India should shift its policy of strategic autonomy and strategically cooperate with the US.
So far, India has strengthened its "Look East" policy. It has enhanced strategic and security cooperation with countries such as Japan, South Korea, Malaysia and Vietnam, and has taken a high profile in the South China Sea disputes.
In December 2011, the first trilateral dialogue between the US, Japan and India was presided over by the US, and one of the topics discussed was China's growing military and political global position.
It's no wonder many think that India may abandon strategic autonomy in order to ally with the US and contain China.
Currently, Indian policymakers have a relatively clear judgment on Sino-Indian relations and Indian-US ones. India doesn't have the ability to directly confront China yet, and as a country prioritizing economic development, India is in need of a peaceful neighboring environment.
Affected by the economic crisis, the US is also heavily burdened by its domestic economic problems.
Within India, the so-called China threat is a trick by Indian political figures to fool their people and Western countries. By making waves about China, Indian politicians can avoid domestic problems, bolster up national morale, and raise votes. And on the international level, India can obtain advanced weaponry and technologies from Western countries.
However in fact, the major direction of Indian military expansion is the Indian Ocean, and the navy has the largest part of India's rapid growing defense budget. India's military strategy on land is defensive, and it has another, more serious competitor than China in the Indian Ocean.
The border issue is still an obstacle in bilateral relations. India has never fully confronted its failings in 1962.
For instance, the Henderson Brooks-Bhagat report, detailing the reasons why the country lost the war, was never declassified and has not been released to the Indian public.
It's time for Chinese and Indian scholars to conduct joint research on some historical problems, to alter both sides' long-standing misconceptions.
The author is a visiting fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a research fellow at Shanghai Institutes for International Studies. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/781259.shtml#.UZECBaL-Gvc
China's submarines in Indian Ocean worry Indian Navy
Rahul Singh, Hindustan Times New Delhi, April 07, 2013
An increasing number of Chinese submarines venturing into the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) pose a grave danger to India’s security interests, a classified defence ministry document has revealed.
Chinese submarines in Indian Ocean. HT Photo
Citing subsurface contact data shared by US forces, the document said at least 22 contacts were recorded with vessels suspected to be Chinese attack submarines patrolling outside Beijing’s territorial waters last year.
It has warned that the “implicit focus” of the Chinese navy appears to be undermining the Indian Navy’s edge “to control highly-sensitive sea lines of communication”.
The document, titled ‘Indian Navy: Perceived Threats to Subsurface Deterrent Capability and Preparedness’, has been prepared by the Integrated Defence Staff whose mandate includes advising the government on developing force levels and capabilities. It predicts intense rivalry between the two navies in the next three years as China ramps up its strategic manoeuvres.
The Gwadar port, seen as the latest example of China’s ‘String of Pearls’ — strategic attempts to surround India with facilities that can be upgraded to naval bases — also has the navy worried. The port, located in southwest Pakistan, is operated by China.
The Chinese navy’s “extended patrols may fully overlap with the Indian Navy’s area of operation,” the document said. The IOR stretches from the Horn of Africa to the Malacca Strait and southwards to the western shores of Australia.
It also cautions against the Chinese navy building up “expeditionary maritime capabilities” in the form of nuclear-powered submarines and area denial weapons (anti-ship ballistic missiles) “with deployment focus in the IOR”.
The document warned that the Dwadar port would “facilitate enormous command and control capability for prospective Chinese presence in the IOR”.
China has set up a network of ports/facilities in Bangladesh (Chittagong), Myanmar (Sittwe and Coco Island), Sri Lanka (Hambantota), Pakistan (Gwadar) and has also secured docking rights in Seychelles, in what some describe as the culmination of the ‘String-of-Pearls’ strategy.
Experts, however, think the strategy is overrated and will not dilute India's influence in the region.
"Converting a port or token port facilities into a naval base is a huge leap. I don't think China can do that," said strategic affairs expert Rear Admiral (retd) Raja Menon. "Also, any country that allows China to do that will risk India's enmity."
Similarly, defence analyst Commodore (retd) Uday Bhaskar said, "The suggestion that China is strangulating India with a 'String of Pearls' is an exaggeration."
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/China-s-submarines-in-Indian-Ocean-worry-Indian-Navy/Article1-1038689.aspx
Red Star Over the Indian Ocean?
By J. Michael Cole
April 9, 2013
Attack submarines from the Chinesenavy are becoming increasingly active in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) and could pose a “grave threat” to Indian interests there, a report by the Indian defense ministry said last week.
Using subsurface contact information reportedly shared by the U.S. military, the report, prepared by the Integrated Defence Staff, said that at least 22 contacts had been made in the IOR in the past year alone, with the latest incident occurring in February. As India is confident that only two navies in the region — the U.S. Navy and the Indian Navy — have the capabilities to engage in such activity, the Indian military concluded that the boats involved were very likely from the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN).
Indian media said the report proved that a fleet of Chinese nuclear submarines was making “frequent forays into the Indian Ocean.”
According to the report, titled Indian Navy: Perceived Threats to Subsurface Deterrent Capability and Preparedness, the “implicit focus” of the PLAN appeared to be undermining the Indian Navy’s ability “to control highly sensitive sea lines of communication” within the region. For the time being, however, China’s intent more likely was to determine the Indian Navy’s ability to detect undersea objects. The report added that the PLAN’s “extended patrols may fully overlap with the Indian Navy’s area of operation.”
The focus of such deployments, the report said, was the IOR, a sea area that spans from waters off the Horn of Africa to the Malacca Strait and the western shores of Australia.
According to India Today’s coverage of the report, one contact with a suspected Chinese submarine took place 90 km from Indian soil in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, while six took place northwest of the Straits of Malacca, 13 south of Sri Lanka and two in the Arabian Sea. The submarines were believed to be from the South Sea Fleet based at Sanya on Hainan Island, off China’s southern coast.
In May 2012, China announced that it could deploy Type 094 nuclear submarines at Yulin Naval Base at Sanya as part of its long-term strategy in the South China Sea. The SSBN will eventually be outfitted with outfitted with the JL-2 Sea Launched Ballistic Missiles (SLBMs).
The number of confirmed contacts mentioned in the report represented a marked increase from four year ago, when U.S. intelligence reportedly revealed that China’s fleet of more than 50 submarines had carried out 12 “extended patrols” outside its territorial waters in 2008, up from six the previous year. Reports then did not indicate where the extended patrols were said to have taken place, though it can be assumed that some occurred near or within the IOR.
Such signs of increasing activity in the IOR have fostered fears — and those were reflected in the report — that the PLAN may have embarked on a project to “strangulate” India.
Port facilities in Gwadar, Pakistan, close to the border with Iran, which China has is suspected of seeking to turn into a naval facility as part of its “string of pearls” in the region, would give the PLAN “enormous command and control capability for prospective … presence in the IOR,” the report warned.
Furthermore, the report said, the Chinese Navy appears to be building “expeditionary maritime capabilities” and could use nuclear-powered submarines and area denial weapons such as the DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile to threaten India within the region.
Some Indian analysts, however, have gone on the record saying that such assessments tend to overstate thenature of the threat and the viability of the “strong of pearls” as a means to transform PLAN adventurism in the area into a more permanent presence. Still, the growing frequency of PLAN submarines in the IOR is yet another sign — and this shouldn’t be surprising to anyone anymore — that China has ambitions to become a global naval player. The waters are also becoming increasingly important for China, as its energy imports from Africa and the Middle East, which must transit the IOR, continue to grow.
http://thediplomat.com/flashpoints-blog/2013/04/09/red-star-over-the-indian-ocean/