Quantcast
Channel: Bharatkalyan97
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 11175

Itihāsa. With a large cache of Dilmun seals, Indus Script Corpora has grown to c. 30,000 insciptions of wealth-accounting ledgers

$
0
0

-- Worship of purifying power of water, mother of Hindu civilization. Indus Script Corpora nclude Dilmun/Bahrain seals 

This is an addendum to: 

1. Itihāsa of Assur, metalsmiths of India, Ashur Ancient Near East. Two seals of Saar, Bahrain Indus Script hypertexts wealth-accounting metalwork ledgers https://tinyurl.com/ya5nzf6k

2. Itihāsa.Dilmun armourers, آهن ګران āhan-garān 'thunderbolt makers' of Sarasvati Civiliztion, Indus Script Meluhha Part 1 to 3 https://tinyurl.com/y7vsvtdm

3. Dilmun seals should be included in Indus Script Corpora, artisans and seafaring merchants of Sarasvati Civiization in Qal'at al-Bahrain, 2050 BCE



 

Background

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DV_5fI_9b3M (52:19) 

Directed by Serge Tigneres, Tomomi Nagazawa
Script Serge Tigneres
Narrator: Simon Chilvers

Script and subtitles: George Burchett, Keith McLennan

The Indus Valley Civilisation Mohenjodaro and Harappa

4:40 to 5:50 : In the 19 century it was admitted that India was the mother of the civilization but in fact the big civilization could be only the middle east and Egypt. Mortimer Willer who was one of the greatest British archaeologist who worked in India called it the Cinderella of the civilization because it was the little last one, we even thought that it was a pale copy of Mesopotamian civilization before to see that it was a totally different civilization. When we start to search we saw that there was no material which can be similar to Mesopotamian civilization, but we saw very quickly that there was huge town, there are sites which are more than 200-300 hectare Mohenjodaro is probably the biggest town of all the antic town. 14:40 to 15:14 : The big watercourses like the Indus, are very important in the developpment of this civilization like each agricultural civilization, it's because of the watercourses that it's possible to have agriculture to feed towns which where the population will be less paysant but more laborer and craftsman, long time ago the Indus spread everywhere on a flat plain, and it was on this flat plain that we can find agriculture with the risk to see each year the field disappear (flooded) . 28:06 to 29:02 : We have a precise idea of the power of the economic system in the big towns, particulary in Mohenjo Daro or Harada, we have extremely powerful craft that produce product that only this civilization know how to do it as for example a type of ceramic almost industrial, without counting all what disappeared, the Indus population was probably a huge textile's manufacturer, a huge processed food product with their era techniques, all that we do not have any traces, all that have disappeared but over all we can say that in the Indus civilization some product had a status that we can nowadays qualify as industrial and was exported everywhere even until Mesopotamia. 30:40 to 31:51 : One of the problems of the Indus civilization was that those people was writing, we know that, we have thousands and thousands of "documents" but they was writing on a perishable medium, so we didn't find the real writing, what we found was like nowadays the name of the street on plates, names/indications on key-holder, etc ... we found everything that stay in times, but the perishable medium disappeared so we don't know, we do not have full text. So we saw a civilization that was writing, but we didn't know, we thought that it was a kind of magic writing, but in fact it was probably a civilization which have politic and administrative government like Egypt. For sure until we will be able to decrypt the writing , meaning to find a text long enough to apply the classic techniques of decryption, we even do not know nowadays what kind of language those people was using. 38:57 to 41:06 : Sea transportation for commercial purpose of the Indus civilization is a question that we start around 20 years ago. we knew that the rivers was used for the commerce between Indus towns, the question about the sea commercial transportation is more sensitive. we know materials from Indus, it come from the Oman's peninsula and some countries around, but more important than that we have Mesopotamian's texts around 2300BC saying that came to tie up to the dock of his capital Guilmun (a zone between the Kuwait and Quatar) some boats from "Magan" some boats from "Melhunra" (not sure about the name's spelling) which is the country of the Indus. Probably it was a commerce with all the people of this area. Also probably, It was not the people from the Indus which start to navigate on the sea, because they was lands people and you can imagine that all the Indus area (the Delta of the river) was a marsh area, a difficult area to pass through, but after a wile, in the middle of the third millennium (BC) this area is an international commercial area, where pass jewelries like the big pearl that only people of Indus manufacture and are the only one to know how to manufacture it, but also the commerce is always about textiles and everything from everywhere like ivory combs etc .. 42:25 to 43:13 : How they communicate when they was trading ? we have a Sumerian text at the end of the third millennium in Mesopotamia which "speak" about a "Malhoura" translator, a guy who know Indus language and Sumerian language. It's a shame that this guy didn't let us a dictionary (the french guy is joking). But in fact all this pre-historic world, where people was always trading is a multi-language world, it's only in our world where people speak one language plus the English. 47:38 to : How they disappear (Indus civilization)? roughly he said (i'm a bit tired) the government became more local, in the big towns they start to live differently which by no means it mean they live it, they just live differently and he said that in archeology it's hard to see it, so they do not really know.

Explorations since 1872 have revealed over 2000 archaeological sites (Rakhigarhi, Ropar, Banawali, Kalibangan, Bhirrana) of this civilization on the banks of Vedic River Sarasvati (also called Ghaggar-Hakra-Nara) which had later dried up due to plate tectonics, resultant river migrations.
Image result for sarasvati civilization satellite
Image result for bronze age sites persian gulf
Fig 3: map of steatite objects from the third to the first millennium B.C. in the Gulf (after Al-Duweesh 2015)
Pour citer ce billet

Sultan Duwish, « Bronze Age Archaeological Sites in the Western Arabian Gulf: Synthesis and Comparisons », Le carnet de la MAFKF. Recherches archéologiques franco-koweïtiennes de l’île de Faïlaka (Koweït), 13 février 2016. [En ligne] 
Map of steatite objects from the third to the first millennium B.C. in the Gulf (after Al-Duweesh 2015)
https://mafkf.hypotheses.org/1311

Growth of Indus Script Corpora to c. 30,000 inscriptions

In 1875, one Harappa seal discovered in 1872 was published by Cunningham
In 1977, Mahadevan concordance published 2856 Indus Script inscriptions from 5 major sites, 34 from other sites and 17 from West Asian sites:













In 2010, Vol. 3 of Corpus of Indus Seals and Inscriptions was published. See: https://tinyurl.com/yb695goq Asko Parpola, 2018, Unicorn Bull and Victory Parade, in: Dennys Frenez et al, 2018, Walking with the Unicorn'

This third volume follows CISI I (1987) and CISI 2 (2991) and includes objects with inscriptions found by the Harappa Archaeological Research Project (HARP).
I agree with Asko Parpola that the motif of ‘unicorn bull’ was perhaps adopted by  the Harappans from Mesopotamia, where it was represented on seals from the Late Uruk times (c. 3400-3100 BCE onwards.
Impressions of two seals of the Proto-Elamite culture (c. 3200-2600 BCE). (After Amiet 1980: nos. 514 and 515).

Detail of the Mari Ishtar temple victory parade: thestand topped by the image of unicorn wild bull (excavationno. M-458), height 7cm. (After Parrot 1935: 134, fig. 15)

a     
a)A procession of four men holding up stands topped by various things including a ‘unicorn’ bull. Terracotta tablet M-490 (HR 1443) from Mohenjo-daro; b) Terracotta tablet M-491 (HR 1546) from Mohenjo-daro; c) a unique tablet H-196 (262) from Harappa. After Asko Parpola Figure 6, 2018.
     
  Corpus of Indus seals and inscriptions, volume 3 added 475 seals from Mohenjo-Daro and 1571 seals from Harappa.

    Dilmun or Persian Gulf or Arabian Gulf seals have added to the Indus Script Corpora. In the Saar settlement, sixty five out of the ninety five retrieved seals (over 68%) were made of steatite.  

    Steffen Terp Laursen [Arab. arch. epig. 2010: 21: 96–134 (2010)] The westward transmission of Indus Valley sealing technology: origin and development of the ‘Gulf Type’ seal and other administrative technologies in Early Dilmun, c.2100–2000 BCE, lists 121 inscriptions of the so-called Dilmun or Gulf seals.

    Elic Olijdamand Helen David-Cuny suggest that the total number of Gulf seals over a period of 250 years could have totalled over 24,000.

    With these additions to Indus Script Corpora, the total number of Indus Script inscriptions now total nearly 30,000. Since all the inscrptions are wealth-acconting ledgers,metalwork catalogues, the contributions made by seafaring Meluhha merchants and artisans to the Tin-Bronze Revolution from 4th millennium BCE is significant, indeed and may explain the principal reasons for Ancient Bharat contributing to over 33% of World GDP in 1 CE (pace Angus Maddison).

Corpus of Indus Seals and Inscriptions, Vol. 3.1


Corpus of Indus Seals and Inscriptions, Vol. 3 by Asko Parpola
Author: 
OCLC: 
Volume 3.1 Mohenjo-daro and Harappa of the most comprehensive listing of ancient Indus seals includes new material, untraced objects, and collections outside India and Pakistan.
Edited by ASKO PARPOLA, B. M. PANDE, and PETTERI KOSKIKALLIO, in collaboration with RICHARD H. MEADOW and J. MARK KENOYER
Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Sarja, Series B, NIDE, vol. 359
Memories of the Archaeological Survey of India, vol. 96. Helsinki, 2010.
Pp. lx + 444, photographs, line drawings, and tablets.

Cuneiform texts attest to the presence of Meluhha settlements in Sumer. [The Meluḫḫa Village: Evidence of Acculturation of Harappan Traders in Late ThirdMillennium Mesopotamia?Author(s): Simo Parpola, Asko Parpola, Robert H. Brunswig, Jr.Source:Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 20, No. 2 (May, 1977),pp. 129-165].
[quote] MAGAN and MELUHHA Geographical terms for regions in the distant south and southeast of Mesopotamia. Both names first appear in royal inscriptions of the Akkad period; “ships from Magan and Meluhha” were said to have brought goods to the quays of Akkad and other cities. It has been proposed that Magan referred to the coast of Oman along the Persian Gulf, rich in copper and dates, and Meluhha in the Indus valley. In Neo-Assyrian texts of the first millennium B.C., Magan and Meluhha probably designated the African coast of the Red Sea (Upper Egypt and Sudan). --Historical Dictionary of Mesopotamia[unquote]
The major contribution made by Meluhhans in Sumer was tin as an alloying mineral to create tin-bronzes (to complement naturally-occurring copper + arsenic ores for arsenic bronzes).
Meluhhan artisans in Sumer used Indus writing to create metal-ware catalogs. This is exemplified by the 'water-buffalo' glyph used on some cylinder seals. rango 'water buffalo' Rebus: rango ‘pewter’. ranga, rang pewter is an alloy of tin, lead, and antimony (anjana) (Santali).  Hieroglyhph: buffalo: Ku. N. rã̄go ʻ buffalo bull ʼ (or < raṅku -- ?).(CDIAL 10538, 10559) Rebus: raṅga3 n. ʻ tin ʼ lex. [Cf. nāga -- 2, vaṅga -- 1Pk. raṁga -- n. ʻ tin ʼ; P. rã̄g f., rã̄gā m. ʻ pewter, tin ʼ (← H.); Ku. rāṅ ʻ tin, solder ʼ, gng. rã̄k; N. rāṅrāṅo ʻ tin, solder ʼ, A. B. rāṅ; Or. rāṅga ʻ tin ʼ, rāṅgā ʻ solder, spelter ʼ, Bi. Mth. rã̄gā, OAw. rāṁga; H. rã̄g f., rã̄gā m. ʻ tin, pewter ʼ; Si. ran̆ga ʻ tin ʼ.(CDIAL 10562) B. rāṅ(g) ʻ tinsel, copper -- foil ʼ.(CDIAL 10567)
"The adaptation of Harappan motifs and script to the Dilmun seal form may be a further indication of the acculturative phenomenon, one indicated in Mesopotamia by the adaptation of Harappan traits to the cylinder seal." (Robert H. Brunswig, Jr. et al, 1983, New Indus Type and Related Seals from the Near East, 101-115 in: Daniel T. Potts (ed.), Dilmun: New Studies in the Archaeology and Early History of Bahrain, Berlin, Dietrich Reimer Verlag, 1983; each seal is referenced by a four-digit number which is registered in the Finnish concordance.)

The Meluḫḫa Village: Evidence of Acculturation of Harappan Traders in Late Third Millennium Mesopotamia?

Simo Parpola, Asko Parpola and Robert H. Brunswig, Jr.
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient
Vol. 20, No. 2 (May, 1977), pp. 129-165
Published by: Brill
DOI: 10.2307/3631775
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3631775
Page [129] of The Meluḫḫa Village: Evidence of Acculturation of Harappan Traders in Late Third Millennium Mesopotamia?
Sealing of a one-horned young bull identifies, marks the product from the ceramic furnace. (At 29:06 of the Archaeodoku youtube video documentary)


Thousands of seals have been found with over 400 recurring signs; discovery of the oldest signboard in the world of Dholavira; seafaring Meluhha merchants in Persian Gulf  (30:23, 31:11; 31"50 to 36:10; 43:20)
Umm al-Nar (Arabicأُمّ الـنَّـار‎, translit. Umm an-Nārlit. 'Mother of the Fire') is the name given to a Bronze age culture that existed around 2600-2000 BCE in the area of modern-day United Arab Emirates and Northern Oman. The etymology derives from the island of the same name which lies adjacent to Abu Dhabi and which provided early evidence and finds attributed to the period.

117 antelope; sun motif. Dholavira seal impression. arka 'sun' Rebus: araka, eraka 'copper, moltencast' PLUS करडूं karaḍū 'kid' Rebus: karaḍā 'hard alloy'. Thus, together, the rebus message: hard alloy of copper. 
Circular seal, of steatite, from Bahrein, found at Lothal.A Stamp seal and its impression from the Harappan site of Lothal north of Bombay, of the type also found in the contemporary cultures of southern Iraq and the Persian Gulf Area. http://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/archaeology-in-india/

ranku 'antelope' Rebus: ranku 'tin' 

I suggest that this hieroglyph of a kid becomes the Dilmun standard with the kid shown with its head turned backwards to signify krammara'turn backwrds' rebus: kamar'blacksmith'.


m417 Glyph: ‘ladder’: H. sainī, senī f. ʻ ladder ʼ Rebus: Pa. sēṇi -- f. ʻ guild, division of army ʼ; Pk. sēṇi -- f. ʻ row, collection ʼ; śrḗṇi (metr. often śrayaṇi -- ) f. ʻ line, row, troop ʼ RV. The lexeme in Tamil means: Limit, boundary; எல்லை. நளியிரு முந்நீரேணி யாக (புறநா. 35, 1). Country, territory.

The glyphics are:
Semantics: ‘group of animals/quadrupeds’: paśu ‘animal’ (RV), pasaramu, pasalamu = an animal, a beast, a brute, quadruped (Te.) Rebus: pasra ‘smithy’ (Santali)

Glyph: ‘six’: bhaṭa ‘six’. Rebus: bhaṭa ‘furnace’.
Glyph (the only inscription on the Mohenjo-daro seal m417): ‘warrior’: bhaṭa. Rebus: bhaṭa ‘furnace’. Thus, this glyph is a semantic determinant of the message: ‘furnace’. It appears that the six heads of ‘animal’ glyphs are related to ‘furnace’ work.
This guild, community of smiths and masons evolves into Harosheth Hagoyim, ‘a smithy of nations’.
It appears that the Meluhhans were in contact with many interaction areas, Dilmun and Susa (elam) in particular. There is evidence for Meluhhan settlements outside of Meluhha. It is a reasonable inference that the Meluhhans with bronze-age expertise of creating arsenical and bronze alloys and working with other metals constituted the ‘smithy of nations’, Harosheth Hagoyim.
Dilmun seal from Barbar; six heads of  antelope radiating from a circle; similar to animal protomes in Failaka, Anatolia and Indus. Obverse of the seal shows four dotted circles. [Poul Kjaerum, The Dilmun Seals as evidence of long distance relations in the early second millennium BC, pp. 269-277.] A tree is shown on this Dilmun seal.

Glyph: ‘tree’: kuṭi ‘tree’. Rebus: kuṭhi ‘smelter furnace’ (Santali).

baTa 'six' Rebus: bhaTa 'furnace' ranku 'antelope' Rebus: ranku 'tin'

Izzat Allah Nigahban, 1991, Excavations at Haft Tepe, Iran, The University Museum, UPenn, p. 97. furnace’ Fig.96a.

There is a possibility that this seal impression from Haft Tepe had some connections with Indian hieroglyphs. This requires further investigation. “From Haft Tepe (Middle Elamite period, ca. 13th century) in Ḵūzestān an unusual pyrotechnological installation was associated with a craft workroom containing such materials as mosaics of colored stones framed in bronze, a dismembered elephant skeleton used in manufacture of bone tools, and several hundred bronze arrowpoints and small tools. “Situated in a courtyard directly in front of this workroom is a most unusual kiln. This kiln is very large, about 8 m long and 2 and one half m wide, and contains two long compart­ments with chimneys at each end, separated by a fuel chamber in the middle. Although the roof of the kiln had collapsed, it is evident from the slight inturning of the walls which remain in situ that it was barrel vaulted like the roofs of the tombs. Each of the two long heating chambers is divided into eight sections by partition walls. The southern heating chamber contained metallic slag, and was apparently used for making bronze objects. The northern heating chamber contained pieces of broken pottery and other material, and thus was apparently used for baking clay objects including tablets . . .” (loc.cit. Bronze in pre-Islamic Iran, Encyclopaedia Iranica, http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/bronze-i Negahban, 1977; and forthcoming).

Many of the bronze-age manufactured or industrial goods were surplus to the needs of the producing community and had to be traded, together with a record of types of goods and types of processes such as native metal or minerals, smelting of minerals, alloying of metals using two or more minerals, casting ingots, forging and turning metal into shapes such as plates or vessels, using anvils, cire perdue technique for creating bronze statues – in addition to the production of artifacts such as bangles and ornaments made of śankha or shell (turbinella pyrum), semi-precious stones, gold or silver beads. Thus writing was invented to maintain production-cum-trade accounts, to cope with the economic imperative of bronze age technological advances to take the artisans of guilds into the stage of an industrial production-cum-trading community.

Tablets and seals inscribed with hieroglyphs, together with the process of creating seal impressions took inventory lists to the next stage of trading property items using bills of lading of trade loads of industrial goods. Such bills of lading describing trade loads were created using tablets and seals with the invention of writing based on phonetics and semantics of language – the hallmark of Indian hieroglyphs.

9351; Nippur; ca. 13th cent. BC; white stone; zebu bull and two pictograms. poLa 'zebu' Rebus: poLa 'magnetite'. goTa 'round object' Rebus: khoTa 'ingot'; bartI 'partridge/quail' (Khotanese); bharati id. (Samskritam) Rebus: bharata 'alloy of copper, pewter, tin'. kuTi 'water-carrier' Rebus: kuThi 'smelter'. Thus, the message is: kuThi poLa khoTa bharata smelter for magnetite, alloy ingot (copper, pewter, tin alloy).

9851; Louvre Museum; Luristan; unglazed, gray steatite; short-horned bull and 4 pictograms. barad 'ox' Rebus: bharata 'alloy of copper, pewter, tin'. dula 'pair' Rebus: dul 'cast metal'; PLUS meD 'body' Rebus: meD 'iron' thus, the pair of 'bodies' signify: iron cast metal. 

dula 'pair' Rebus: dul 'cast metal' PLUS goTa 'seed' Rebus: khoTa 'ingot'. Thus, cast metal ingot. (Next two hieroglyhphs not legible).
9908. Iraq museum; glazed steatite; perhaps from an Iraqi site; the one-horned bull, the standard are below a six-sign inscription. kõdā 'young bull calf' Rebus: kõdā 'turner-joiner' (forge) sã̄gāḍ  lathe, portable furnace Rebus: stone-cutter sangatarāśū ). sanghāḍo (Gujarati) cutting stonegilding (Gujarati); sangsāru kara= to stone (Sindhi) sanghāḍiyo, a worker on a lathe (Gujarati) sangaDa 'cargo boat' sanghAta 'collection of articles'; samghAta 'adamantine glue' (Varahamihira)
aya 'fish' Rebus: aya 'iron, metal' PLUS kANDa 'notch' Rebus: khaNDa 'metal implements'; ayas 'fish' aduru' native metal' (unsmelted) eraka 'nave of wheel' Rebus: eraka 'copper, moltencast' arA 'spokes' Rebus: Ara 'brass'.
Foroughi collection; Luristan; medium gray steatite; bull, crescent, star and net square; of the Dilmun seal type. barad 'ox' Rebus: bharata 'alloy of copper, pewter, tin'; khaNDa 'square divisions' Rebus: khaNDa 'metal implements'; meDha 'polar star' Rebus: meD 'iron'
3255; Louvre Museum; Luristan; light yellow stone; seal impression; one side shows four eagles; the eagles hold snakes in their beaks; at the center is a human figure with outstretched limbs; obverse of the seal shows an animal, perhaps a hyena or boar striding across the field, with a smaller animal of the same type depicted above it; comparable to the seal found in Harappa, Vats 1940, II: Pl. XCI.255.
garuDa 'eagle' Rebus: karaDa 'hard alloy' gaNDa 'four' Rebus: khaNDa 'metal implements' arye 'lion' Rebus: Ara 'brass'.
9701; Failaka; unglazed steatite; an arc of four pictograms above the hindquarter of a bull. meD 'body' Rebus: meD 'iron'; sal 'splinter' Rebus: sal 'workshop' goTa 'seed' Rebus: khoT 'ingot' kolmo 'three' Rebus: kolami 'forge, smithy'. kamaDa 'bow' Rebus: kammaTa 'mint, coiner'.

9702; seal, impression, inscription; Failaka; brownish-grey unglazed steatite; Indus pictograms above a short-horned bull. aya 'fish' Rebus: aya 'iron, metal' kanca 'corner' Rebus: kancu 'bronze'
9602; seal, impression; Qala'at al-Bahrain; green steatite; short-horned bull and five pictograms. Found in association with an Isin-Larsa type tablet bearing three Amorite names. barad 'ox' Rebus: bharata 'alloy of copper, pewter, tin'.
Qala'at al-Bahrain; ca. 2050-1900 BC; tablet, found in the same level where 8 Dilmun seals and six Harappan type weights were found. Three Amorite names are: Janbi-naim; Ila-milkum; Jis.i-tambu (son of Janbi-naim)
Two seals from Gonur 1 in the Murghab delta; dark brown stone (Sarianidi 1981 b: 232-233, Fig. 7, 8); eagle engraced on one face. garuDa 'eagle' Rebus: karaDa 'hard alloy' nAga 'serpent' Rebus: nAga 'lead'

9601; Qala'at al-Bahrain; light-grey steatite; hindquarters of a bull and two pictograms. barad 'ox' Rebus: bharata 'alloy of copper, pewter, tin'
Seal impression; Dept. of Antiquities, Bahrain; three Harapan-style bulls. barad 'ox' Rebus: bharata 'alloy of copper, pewter, tin' kolmo 'three' Rebus: kolami 'smithy, forge'.

Hieroglyph: meṇḍā ʻlump, clotʼ (Oriya) 

On mED 'copper' in Eurasian languages:

Wilhelm von Hevesy wrote about the Finno-Ugric-Munda kinship, like "Munda-Magyar-Maori, an Indian link between the antipodes new tracks of Hungarian origins" and "Finnisch-Ugrisches aus Indien". (DRIEM, George van: Languages of the Himalayas: an ethnolinguistic handbook. 1997. p.161-162.) Sumerian-Ural-Altaic language affinities have been noted. Given the presence of Meluhha settlements in Sumer, some Meluhha glosses might have been adapted in these languages. One etyma cluster refers to 'iron' exemplified by meD (Ho.). The alternative suggestion for the origin of the gloss med 'copper' in Uralic languages may be explained by the word meD (Ho.) of Munda family of Meluhha language stream:
Sa. <i>mE~R~hE~'d</i> `iron'.  ! <i>mE~RhE~d</i>(M).
Ma. <i>mErhE'd</i> `iron'.
Mu. <i>mERE'd</i> `iron'.
  ~ <i>mE~R~E~'d</i> `iron'.  ! <i>mENhEd</i>(M).
Ho <i>meD</i> `iron'.
Bj. <i>merhd</i>(Hunter) `iron'.
KW <i>mENhEd</i>
@(V168,M080)
— Slavic glosses for 'copper'
Мед [Med]Bulgarian
Bakar Bosnian
Медзь [medz']Belarusian
Měď Czech
Bakar Croatian
KòperKashubian
Бакар [Bakar]Macedonian
Miedź Polish
Медь [Med']Russian
Meď Slovak
BakerSlovenian
Бакар [Bakar]Serbian
Мідь [mid'] Ukrainian[unquote]
Miedź, med' (Northern Slavic, Altaic) 'copper'.  
One suggestion is that corruptions from the German "Schmied", "Geschmeide" = jewelry. Schmied, a smith (of tin, gold, silver, or other metal)(German) result in med ‘copper’. 

Meluhha acculturation in Ancient Near East

Many scholars have noted the contacts between the Mesopotamian and Sarasvati-Sindhu (Indus, Hindu) Civilizations, in terms of cultural history, chronology, artefacts (beads, jewellery), pottery and seals found from archaeological sites in the two areas.

"...the four examples of round seals found in Mohenjodaro show well-supported sequences, whereas the three from Mesopotamia show sequences of signs not paralleled elsewhere in the Indus Script. But the ordinary square seals found in Mesopotamia show the normal Mohenjodaro sequences. In other words, the square seals are in the Indian language, and were probably imported in the course of trade; while the circular seals, although in the Indus script, are in a different language, and were probably manufactured in Mesopotamia for a Sumerian- or Semitic-speaking person of Indian descent..." [G.R. Hunter,1932.   Mohenjodaro--Indus Epigraphy, JRAS: 466-503]

The acculturation of Meluhhans (probably, Indus people) residing in Mesopotamia in the late third and early second millennium BC, is noted by their adoption of Sumerian names (Parpola, Parpola and Brunswig 1977: 155-159). 
Image 2 below: Right: A single Seal from Falaika Bears an Inscription in the Unread Indus Script. Left: From one of the Falaika Seals. A Man Holds a Monkey at Arm's Length; Monkeys were Imported as Pets from Meluha. (Bibby, pp. 253, 211). 
Failaka seal; unglazed steatite; an arc of four pictograms above the hindquarter of a bull. meD 'body' Rebus: meD 'iron'; sal 'splinter' Rebus: sal 'workshop' goTa 'seed' Rebus: khoT 'ingot' kolmo 'three' Rebus: kolami 'forge, smithy'. kamaDa 'bow' Rebus: kammaTa 'mint, coiner'.



Related imageThis is the image of the first seal and a seal impression which has stimulated the spectacular discoveries of the roots of Hindu Civilization along the banks of River Sarasvati adored in 72 r̥ca-s in the R̥gveda spanning an contact area from Hanoi (Vietnam) to Haifa (Israel), along an ancient Maritime Tin Route which powered the Tin-Bronze Revolution from ca. 5th millennium BCE.


Seal discovered in Harappa by Major Clarke before 1872; given to the British Museum in 1886. Evidence has accumulated over the years since 1872 when Alexander Cunningham published the first reproduction of a seal from Harappa.

[quote]Sir Alexander Cunningham, who led the first excavations there in 1872-73 and published news of the seal, wrote 50 years before we understood that the Indus civilization had existed: "The most curious object discovered at Harappa is a seal, ... The seal is a smooth black stone without polish. On it is engraved very deeply a bull, without a hump, looking to the right, with two stars under the neck. Above the bull there is an inscription in six characters, which are quite unknown to me. They are certainly not Indian letters; and as the bull which accompanies them is without a hump, I conclude that the seal is foreign to India." How wrong Cunningham was about the seal! Still, as Neil MacGregor writes, "it was this seal that stimulated the discovery of the entire Indus civilization." (A History of the World in 100 Objects, p. 80). It was left to a successor, John Marshall, to announce the discovery of the ancient Indus civilization. [unquote] https://www.harappa.com/blog/first-seal

One house in Mohenjo-daro, said to be a temple, revealed 12 objects with Indus Script Inscriptions.
Related image
Michael Jansen’s analysis of house 1 in the HR-A area of Mohenjo-daro.. After Jansen 1986:200:91, fig. 125; a) isometry; (b) distribution of the seal finds, Courtesy: Michael Jansen.

Twelve Indus Script imetalwork catalogues from one Mohenjo-daro house -- kole.l 'smithy/forge' guild artisans of kole.l 'temple' http://tinyurl.com/glaltdl


Distribution of seals/tablets within House AI, Block 1, HR at Mohenjodaro (After Jansen, M., 1987, Mohenjo-daro -- a city on the Indus, in Forgotten Cities on the Indus (M. Jansen, M. Mulloy and G. Urban Eds.), Mainz, Philip Von Zabern, p. 160). Jansen speculated that the house could have been a temple. 

All seven seals out of the 12 inscriptions depicted the same animal 'one-horned young bull in front of a standard device'



Hieroglyphsãgaḍ, 'lathe' (Meluhha) Rebus 1: sãgaṛh , 'fortification' (Meluhha). Rebus 2:sanghAta 'adamantine glue'. Rebus 3: 

 sangāṭh संगाठ् 'assembly, collection'. Rebus 4: sãgaḍa 'double-canoe, catamaran'.


Hieroglyph: one-horned young bull: खोंड (p. 216) [ khōṇḍa ] m A young bull, a bullcalf. Rebus: कोंद kōnda ‘engraver, lapidary setting or infixing gems’ (Marathi)

Hieroglyph: one-horned young bull: खोंड (p. 216) [ khōṇḍa ] m A young bull, a bullcalf. 

Rebus: कोंद kōnda ‘engraver, lapidary setting or infixing gems’ (Marathi)  खोदगिरी [ khōdagirī ] f Sculpture, carving, engraving. 

The inscriptions on the seven seals and five tablets are:

khaNDa 'arrow' rebus:khaNDa 'implements'
muka 'ladle' rebus:muhA 'quantity of smelted metal produced from a furnace' PLUS baTa 'rimless pot' rebus: bhaTa 'furnace' ayo, aya 'fish' rebus: aya 'iron' ayas 'metal' PLUS aDaren 'lid' rebus: aduru 'unsmelte metal' muh 'ingot' PLUS kolom 'rice plant' rebus: kolimi 'smithy, forge' sal 'splinter' rebus: sal 'workshop' muh 'ingot' PLUS baTa 'quail' rebus: bhaTa 'furnace'. Thus, the inscription on the seal signifies: workshop smithy/forge with furnace working to produce metal castings, ingots, implements, iron, unsmelted ore.


karNaka, kanka 'rim of jar' rebus: karNI 'supercargo' karNaka 'scribe, account' कुटिल kuṭila, katthīl 'curve' kuṭila 'bent' CDIAL 3230 Rebus: kuTila 'bronze' (8 parts copper, 2 parts tin).. Thus, a bronze worker handing over produce to the Supercargo as shipment.
karNaka, kanka 'rim of jar' rebus: karNI 'supercargo' karNaka 'scribe, account' dula 'two' rebus: dul 'metal casting' Bshk. sum -- tac̣h ʻ hoe ʼ (< ʻ *earth -- scratcher ʼ),tec̣h ʻ adze ʼ (< *takṣī -- ?); Sh. tac̣i f. ʻ adze ʼ; -- Phal. tērc̣hi ʻ adze ʼ (with "intrusive" r).Rebus: takṣa in cmpd. ʻ cutting ʼ, m. ʻ carpenter ʼ VarBr̥S., vṛkṣa -- takṣaka -- m. ʻ tree -- feller ʼ R. [√takṣ]Pa. tacchaka -- m. ʻ carpenter ʼ, taccha -- sūkara -- m. ʻ boar ʼ; Pk. takkha -- , °aya -- m. ʻ carpenter, artisanʼ (CDIAL 5618) PLUS khaNDa 'arrow' rebus: khaNDa 'implements'. Thus, a carpenter artisan implements.


kolom 'rice plant' rebus: kolimi 'smithy, forge' karã̄ n. pl. wristlets, banglesRebus: khAr 'blacksmith, iron worker' ayo, aya 'fish' rebus: aya 'iron' ayas 'metal' karNaka, kanka 'rim of jar' rebus: karNI 'supercargo' karNaka 'scribe, account' dula 'two' rebus: dul 'metal casting' *śrēṣṭrī1 ʻ clinger ʼ. [√śriṣ1]Phal. šē̃ṣṭrĭ̄ ʻ flying squirrel ʼ?(CDIAL 12723) Rebus: guild master khāra, 'squirrel', rebus: khār खार् 'blacksmith' (Kashmiri). Thus, the inscription signifies: blacksmith guild-master working in iron in smithy/forge, metal castings handed over to Supercargo for shipment. 

 dATu 'cross' rebus: dhAtu 'element, mineral' karNaka, kanka 'rim of jar' rebus: karNI 'supercargo' karNaka 'scribe, account' ayo, aya 'fish' rebus: aya 'iron' ayas 'metal' khambhaṛā 'fin' rebus: kammaTa 'mint' khANDa 'notch' rebus: khaNDa 'implements'. Thus, minerals, metal, alloys handed over to Supercargo for shipment.

karNaka, kanka 'rim of jar' rebus: karNI 'supercargo' karNaka 'scribe, account' ranku 'liquid measure' rebus: ranku 'tin' muh 'ingot' PLUS kolom 'rice plant' rebus: kolimi 'smithy, forge' sal 'splinter' rebus: sal 'workshop' baTa 'quail' rebus: bhaTa 'furnace' Thus workshop smithy/forge (working with) furnace ingots, tin handed over to Supercargo for shipment.


kuTi 'water carrier' rebus: kuThi 'smelter' PLUS karNaka, kanka 'rim of jar' rebus: karNI 'supercargo' karNaka 'scribe, account' koDa 'one' rebus: koD 'workshop' kANDA 'notch' kaNDa 'arrow' rebus: kaNDa 'implements' kolmo 'three' rebus: kolimi 'smithy, forge' baTa 'rimless pot' PLUS muka 'ladle' rebus: muhA 'quantity of metal produced from furnace, ingot'. Thus, Supercargo of smelter workshop produce, metal implements furnaced metal for smithy, forge


 karNaka, kanka 'rim of jar' rebus: karNI 'supercargo' karNaka 'scribe, account' kole.l 'temple' rebus:kole.l 'smithy, forge' kaNDa 'backbone' rebus:khaNDa 'implements' sal 'splinter' rebus: sal 'workshop' kolmo 'rice plant' rebus:kolimi 'smithy, forge' muh 'ingot' Thus, Supercargo from smithy, forge, implements, ingots workshop of smithy/forge.

bhaTa 'warrior' rebus: bhaTa 'furnace' karNika 'spread legs' rebus: karNI 'Supercargo' Thus, furnace  (produce) worker.and a Supercargo, merchant's representative responsible for the cargo.


kuTi 'water carrier' rebus: kuThi 'smelter' PLUS karNaka, kanka 'rim of jar' rebus: karNI 'supercargo' karNaka 'scribe, account' muh 'ingot' PLUS kolom 'rice plant' rebus: kolimi 'smithy, forge' tec̣h ʻadze' rebus: takSa 'carpenter' sal 'splinter' rebus: sal 'workshop' kanac 'corner' rebus: kancu 'bronze'. Thus, Supercargo-carpente of smelter workshop, smithy, forge, bronze.


karNaka, kanka 'rim of jar' rebus: karNI 'supercargo' karNaka 'scribe, account' dula 'two' rebus: dul 'metal casting'  karã̄ n. pl. wristlets, banglesRebus: khAr 'blacksmith, iron worker' kolmo 'three' rebus: kolimi 'smithy/forge' baTa 'rimless pot' rebus: bhaTa 'furnace' PLUS khANDA 'notch' rebus: khaNDa 'implements' dhaTo 'claws of crab' rebus: dhatu 'mineral' Thus,Supercargo of metal castings, blacksmith, smithy/forge furnace implements.


karNaka, kanka 'rim of jar' rebus: karNI 'supercargo' karNaka 'scribe, account' muh 'ingot' PLUS khANDA 'notch' rebus: khaNDa 'implements'. Thus, Supercargo of metal ingots, implements.

Thus, it is seen that all the 12 inscriptions are metalwork catalogues of artisans of the guild preparing products (ingots, implements) for shipment to be handed to Supercargo responsible for the cargo.

The building HR1 was thus a smithy, forge. kole.l signified 'smithy/forge'. The same word kole.l also signified 'temple'. Thus, all the artisans at work documenting 12 inscriptions were members of the smithy/forge guild which was the temple.

Alexander Cunningham of the ASI 02.jpg"Alexander Cunningham (23 January 1814 – 28 November 1893) was an officer of the Royal engineers. He came to India in 1831. Since his arrival in the country, he devoted his time to the study of the ancient remains of Indian history. Alexander Cunningham recorded the existence of a series of mounds after visiting Harappan site. He is credited to have conducted a limited excavation of the Harappan site. He published a few Objects (such as seals) as well as the site-plan. He was appointed Archeological Surveyor in 1861.http://deepak-indianhistory.blogspot.com/2011/05/sir-alexander-cunningham-father-of.html The position was terminated in 1865 due to lack of funds. (Cotton, J. S. & James Lunt (reviser) (2004). "Cunningham, Sir Alexander (1814–1893)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press.)

Drawn diagram of the ruins of Harappa""Since the first publication of material in 1872, the site of Harappa has provided focus for protohistoric archaeological investigations in the Punjab region of northwestern South Asia. The current University of California, Berkeley, project us here put into context of earlier work at the site and into the context of the history of archaeology in the Greater Indus Valley as a whole.""(Gregory L. Possehl, A short history of archaeological discovery at Harappa, in: Richard H. Meadow (ed.), Harappa Excavations 1986-1990 – a multidisciplinary approach to third millennium urbanism,  Madison, Wisconsin, Prehistory Press, pp. 5 to 12)  

[quote]In 1924 the objects found at Mohenjo-daro were compared with some found at Harappa. Many objects were so similar in material and construction that the archaeologists believed they might have been made by people sharing the same culture.

The work at Mohenjo-daro was successful. The possibility that objects from the site might be related to those from Harappa was exciting for the archaeologists. The next step was to explore the site more completely. So large-scale excavations were planned for Mohenjo-daro under the guidance of Sir John Marshall who was the Director General of the Archaeological Survey of India.
Excavations continued throughout the 1920s and 1930s with several teams of excavators. During this period, the site was divided into different areas. Each area was given a 'title' based on the name of the archaeologist working there.
HR Area = Harold Hargreaves
DK Area = Kashinath Narayan Dikshit
L Area = Ernest J.H. Mackay
VS Area = Madho Sarup Vats



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 11175

Trending Articles