THE DISASTROUS INFLUENCE OF POPE BENEDICT XVI
Posted by John Cassidy
Spare me any more reverential coverage about Pope Benedict XVI and his decision to give up his office. On a personal level, I wish him well. At the age of eighty-five and increasingly infirm, he surely deserves a rest. But as far as his record goes, he can’t leave office a moment too soon. His lengthy tenure at the Vatican, which included more than twenty years as the Catholic Church’s chief theological enforcer before he became Pope, in 2005, has been little short of disastrous. By setting its face against the modern world in general, and by dragging its feet in response to one of the worst scandals since the Reformation, Benedict’s Vatican has called the Church’s future into question, needlessly alienating countless people around the world who were brought up in its teachings.
Not that it matters much, but you can count me among them. When I was a boy, in Leeds, West Yorkshire, the nuns at Sacred Heart Primary School taught my classmates and me the New Testament from slim paperbacks with embossed navy-blue covers. We each got four of them: “The Good News According to Luke,” The Good News According to Matthew,” “The Good News According to Mark,” and “The Good News According to John.” Of the four gospels, the most thumbed, by far, were those of Luke, which contains many of Jesus’s parables, and Matthew, which features the Sermon on the Mount: “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted. Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth…”
It was the early seventies, an era of hope and optimism for many Catholics. Following the lengthy Second Vatican Council, called by Pope John XXIII in 1959, the Church had made a determined effort to modernize some of its doctrines and practices. Masses, which for many centuries had been confined to Latin, were now celebrated in other languages. Priests, who traditionally faced the altar during services, had been instructed to face their congregations and invite them to participate. In place of a stultifying focus on ancient dogmas and ceremonies, there was a return to the actual teachings of Jesus, which were being interpreted in increasingly liberal and egalitarian ways, as evidenced by the words of a popular folk hymn we used to sing, a few lines of which I recount from memory:
He sent me to give the Good News to the poor.
Tell prisoners that they are prisoners no more.
Tell blind people that they can see,
And set the downtrodden free.
I didn’t know it at the time, but the church’s concern with bread-and-butter issues had been expressed from the top. In 1967, Pope Paul VI, John XXIII’s successor, issued “Populorum Progressio,” an encyclical on “the development of peoples,” which asserted that the global economy should serve the many, not just the few. Updating the Church’s teachings to take account of widespread poverty and inequality, the Pontiff recognized the right to a just wage, security of employment, and decent working conditions. He even recognized the right to join a union.
Not everybody shared the vision of Catholicism as an urgent and uplifting force for social justice, though many people in South America and other developing areas of the world did. (In some places, it became known as “liberation theology,” a phrase coined by the Peruvian priest Gustavo Gutierrez.) Many older priests, including the venerable Canon Flynn, who oversaw my local church, Our Lady of Lourdes, had little time for innovations. They were content to celebrate the sacraments as they always had, saying Mass every day, issuing the last rites to stricken parishioners, and doling out “three Our Fathers and three Hail Marys” to penitents, such as my young self, who came to confess their sins. But the energy and the future of the church appeared to rest with the modernizers.
This was despite the fact that Paul VI also reaffirmed many of the Vatican’s traditional teachings on social issues, such as extramarital sex, birth control, homosexuality, and enforced celibacy for priests and nuns. Paul was hardly a revolutionary. He wasn’t willing to challenge the harsh, self-denying ordinances that a series of Roman popes had foisted on Christianity during the Middle Ages. But in calling for peace and social justice, in reaching out to other faiths, in traveling extensively—he was known as “the Pilgrim Pope”—and in making some reforms at the Vatican, such as surrendering his tiara (the papal crown) and barring cardinals over the age of eighty from voting in papal elections, he seemed interested in reconciling the Church to modern reality.
With the arrival of Pope John Paul II, in 1979, all that started to change. In many ways, Karol Wojtyla was an admirable man: a part of the Polish resistance against the Nazis; a vocal opponent of wars and militarism (in 2003, he criticized the invasion of Iraq); a supporter of canceling debts in the developing world; and a massively charismatic leader. In theological and practical terms, though, he was a dreadful throwback. With the Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the future Benedict XVI, at his side, as the Vatican’s chief theologian, he set about unmaking much of the modernization project of the previous twenty years. He issued lengthy and emphatic rulings condemning abortion, birth control, and homosexuality. He dismissed calls for the relaxation of the celibacy rules for priests, and for the ordination of women. He criticized liberation theology and surrounded himself with dyed-in-the-wool conservatives like Ratzinger. Within the hierarchy of the Church, questioning traditional teachings, even gently, became a potential career-ender.
After John Paul died, in 2005, and Ratzinger took over, the conservative counter-offensive continued. Indeed, it intensified. The Vatican eased restrictions on the Latin Mass and invited back into the Church some excommunicated members of the Society of Saint Pius X, an ultra-conservative group dedicated to reversing the Second Vatican Council. (One member of the group, an English bishop called Richard Williamson, turned out to be a Holocaust denier. Last year, belatedly, the Society expelled him.) In criticizing the “culture of relativism” in modern societies, and “the anarchic freedom that wrongly passes for true freedom,” Benedict made clear that he saw his primary mission not as extending and enlarging the Catholic Church but as purifying it, by which he didn’t just mean dealing with the child-abuse scandal. He meant casting off extraneous growths and getting the Church back to what he saw as its proper roots. If this process alienated some current and former members of the faith, so be it. Benedict said numerous times that the Church might well be healthier if it was smaller.
In a 2011 interview with the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel, Hans Küng, a dissident Swiss theologian who knew Pope Benedict when they were both young priests in Germany, made a telling comparison between him and Vladimir Putin, pointing out that the two leaders had inherited a series of democratic reforms they set out to reverse. Putin and Benedict both “placed their former associates in key positions and sidelined those they didn’t like,” Küng said. He added:
One could draw other parallels: the disempowerment of the Russian parliament and the Vatican Synod of Bishops, the degradation of Russian provincial governors and of Catholic bishops to make them nothing but recipients of orders; a conformist ‘nomenclature’; and a resistance to real reforms.… Under the German pope, a small, primarily Italian clique of yes-men, people with no sympathy for the calls to reform, were allowed to come into power. They are partly responsible for the stagnation that stifles every attempt at modernization of the church system.
The strategy of circling the wagons and seeking to defy the world was displayed, to terrible effect, in the Church’s reaction to the child-abuse scandal. As the Vatican official that John Paul II asked to deal with the crisis when it broke, Benedict was presented with extensive evidence that sexual abuse was widespread and tolerated by church authorities. But it wasn’t until many years later, when tremendous damage had already been done and many further crimes had been committed, that Benedict, as Pope, apologized for the acts of pedophiles in cassocks, adopted a zero-tolerance policy for the Church, and met with some of the victims. Even then, though, say some critics, he and his colleagues in the Vatican resisted efforts to find and punish the perpetrators.
“His record was terrible,” David Clohessy, executive director of the twelve-thousand-strong Survivors’ Network of those Abused by Priests, told The Guardian. “He knows more about clergy sex crimes and cover-ups than anyone else in the Church, yet he has done precious little to protect children.” From Ireland, where investigations are continuing into extensive abuse at church-run orphanages and schools, John Kelly, one of the founders of the country’s Survivors of Child Abuse group, said, “I’m afraid to say Pope Benedict won’t be missed, as the Vatican continued to block proper investigations into the abuse scandals during his term in office.… For us, he broke his word.”
As a result of the sex scandals and the Vatican’s futile attempt to turn back the clock, Pope Benedict’s Church is in increasingly perilous shape. Throughout much of the developed world, the number of people attending services is declining steadily, and yet there is a tremendous shortage of priests. In places like Ireland and Benedict’s own Germany, young people are deserting the Church in droves. Even in developing countries like Brazil, the Church is facing challenges from other creeds.
Of course, in a religion of more than a billion, there are some bright spots and some inspiring individuals. When I went home to Leeds not so long ago, I found that an enthusiastic young Polish priest had taken over my childhood church and was trying to save it from closure. To do some good, and raise some money, he was planning to turn the rectory into a halfway house for young offenders. Listening to him celebrating Mass like a man possessed, I was reminded of the Catholicism of the Sermon on the Mount and of St. Francis of Assisi—the Catholicism that the nuns had tried to drill into me decades before.
In Rome, however, the conservative theologians and placeholders are still running the show. Sadly, that is likely to continue. “During [Benedict’s] time in office,” Küng noted, “he has ordained so many conservative cardinals, that amongst them is hardly a single person to be found who could lead the Church out of its multifaceted crisis.”
Photograph: Stefano Dal Pozzolo/Getty.
InShare
8 SHARE ON TUMBLR1
PRINTE-MAIL
73
You might like Most shared
POPE’S DECISION TO COME OUT OF RETIREMENT STIRS CONTROVERSY
ANDY BOROWITZ
TWEETS FROM GULNARA: THE DICTATOR’S DAUGHTER
NATALIA ANTELAVA
O, MATTHEW
REBECCA MEAD
OBAMA URGED TO RESIGN OVER BEYONCÉ SCANDAL
ANDY BOROWITZ
WHY CHENEY AND BOEHNER DON'T THINK THAT OBAMA IS BRAVE
AMY DAVIDSON
CALMLY, OBAMA FIGHTS
HENDRIK HERTZBERG
OBAMA, RIDING HIGH, OVERSHADOWS THE WATER BOY
JOHN CASSIDY
IMMIGRATION REFORM: SHOULD WE TREAT ENGINEERS DIFFERENTLY THAN BRICKLAYERS?
JOHN CASSIDY
OBAMA THE CENTRIST COMES OUT AS A LIBERAL
JOHN CASSIDY
LET’S GET THE FACTS TO REDUCE GUN VIOLENCE
JOHN CASSIDY
OBAMA’S DRONE MAN ESCAPES THE SENATE UNSCATHED
JOHN CASSIDY
POSTSCRIPT: ED KOCH, 1924-2013
JOHN CASSIDY
U.K. LESSON: AUSTERITY LEADS TO MORE DEBT
JOHN CASSIDY
THE OPERATOR: IS THE MOST TRUSTED DOCTOR IN AMERICA DOING MORE HARM THAN GOOD?
MICHAEL SPECTER
PHOTOGRAPHING LOVE
JESSIE WENDER
WEEKEND READING: THE ROYAL FAMILY, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, AND BURNING MAN
ANDREA DENHOED
L’ÉTRANGER: GÉRARD DEPARDIEU AND FRANCE PART WAYS.
LAUREN COLLINS
COVER STORY: JORGE COLOMBO’S IPAD FINGER PAINTINGS
MINA KANEKO AND FRANÇOISE MOULY
Subscribe now to get more of The New Yorker's signature mix of politics, culture, and the arts.
Comments
73 COMMENTS |
These ridiculous secular puff pieces all start the same way, with the author offering up some vague bona fides on why he is qualified to voice an opinion. Since Mr. Cassidy went to Catholic school for a time, and purportedly learned his catechism, we are to believe he knows what he's talking about, or that we should care what he thinks. Guess what, Mr. Cassidy? Your opinion doesn't matter. The Church does not belong to us, just like God does not belong to us. Don't like it? Go start your own church -- it's called Protestantism, and, like heresy, it's been around awhile.
POSTED 2/17/2013, 6:47:47PM BY ADAMRBOWERS
REPORT ABUSE
Let us all pray to Saint Josemaria Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei for Pope Benedict to find many safe houses on his way to Argentina.
POSTED 2/17/2013, 3:50:59PM BY FITZCARRALDO48
REPORT ABUSE
I wonder what the author really believes. He describes John Paul II as "a dreadful throwback" in "theological and practical terms" for issuing "lengthy and emphatic rulings condemning abortion, birth control, and homosexuality". Firstly, this suggests that the Church had moved towards acceptance of abortion, homosexuality, and contraception; I know of evidence only for the last of these, and Cassidy does not provide any. Secondly, his position that it was bad of the Church to reject these things implies that it would have been good of the Church to accept them. Does he think that Jesus would favor abortion rights? Does he think that question is even relevant? As he has already committed himself to making value judgments, intellectual transparency requires him to reveal the grounds on which he is making them.
POSTED 2/17/2013, 2:47:39PM BY ARCHITEUTHISNEB
REPORT ABUSE
Somebody posted here that when it comes to child abuse, the RCC "has a better record than most." I've been racking my brains trying to figure out the category in which the RCC is supposed to be competing here... most monotheistic churches? ...most Romanian orphanages? ...most child pornography rings? --- my students reckon it's the latter.
POSTED 2/17/2013, 1:48:39PM BY JONESYTHECAR
REPORT ABUSE
Have you ever been to the Vatican? I have. It's beautiful. The amount of wealth housed in the vatican(art,gold, catholic coffers) is staggering. It's value is surpassed only by the amount of political sway the catholic network holds around the world. The popes sits atop this heap of wealth and power. What would Jesus do if he was in such a position? My guess is he'd use it to help the poor, starving, disadvantaged of the world. Maybe even sell off a few Michaelangelos or golden goblets to feed a few million people. Rather than scare people with talk of going to hell in an effort to quell dissent and keep a firm seat atop the wealth heap. Then again, this seat may be a little closer to god thus providing the direct line. Wait- why didn't Jesus need to accumulate such a vast wealth? Because he cared more about people than his position of power and wealth. A real leader concerned about the word of God would sell the unnecessary assets and take real action congruent with the teachings of Jesus. Until there is such a leader I will continue to enjoy the colorful bloomers the Vatican guards wear - it keeps my mind content.
POSTED 2/17/2013, 1:42:24PM BY MIKEG6
REPORT ABUSE
It's truly amazing that Christianity has remained in existence for so long. Like its mother, Judaism, and its sibling Islam, Christianity violates our innate God-given reason. One great example is found in one of the author's favorite gospels, Matthew. At Matthew 27:52-53 we are told that when Jesus died on the cross, allegedly on a Friday, the dead rose from their graves in the local graveyards and hung-out near their graves until Sunday morning when Jesus allegedly rose from his tomb. Matthew says that when Jesus rose from the dead, the zombies from the local graveyards walked into Jerusalem "and appeared unto many." And we are supposed to believe this nonsense! The American founder and Deist Thomas Paine called for a revolution in religion based on our God-given reason and Deism in his landmark book on God, Deism and religion, The Age of Reason, The Complete Edition. The Bible's teachings of zombies as being real shows Thomas Paine was correct! Progress! Bob Johnson www.deism.com
POSTED 2/17/2013, 1:09:28PM BY DEIST
REPORT ABUSE
The church unfortunately does not represent Jesus Christ in the least.....its another institution bent on preserving its wealth....otherwise it would distribute it to the poor and needy......Goodbye Pope, lets hope the church can become a more loving beauracracy.
POSTED 2/17/2013, 12:26:19AM BY PROGRESSIVE11
REPORT ABUSE
I was molested by a nun in high school, and when I finally had the courage 20 years after graduation to ask the religious order of nuns who had educated me for 12 years, as well as my two younger sisters for 13 years, for a meeting to discuss what had happened to me I was labeled a liar, or crazy, or worse... I believe every person needs to look in their own hearts and see how afraid we are to believe that priests or nuns or senators, etc. can be capable of leading dishonest and destructive lives. It somehow shakes us to the core, and so we strike out at the victims. Many messengers have been shot in our various communities. But we can survive and heal enough to move forward. I believe what is needed is a Healing Center for clergy sex abuse survivors, where we can come together to live and work and heal. Surely, The Catholic Church has some land somewhere that could be donated for this purpose?!!!
POSTED 2/16/2013, 8:42:25PM BY SHEILAGRAY
REPORT ABUSE
It always seemed to me that Pope Benedict was a homosexual...not practising perhaps, but an effeminate kind of asexual homosexual. It is a striking irony that such anti-gay ideology emanates from an institution with a disproportionately large number of homosexuals as compared to general society. Perhaps these self-hating clerical gays could be taught some beneficial self-affirmation.
POSTED 2/16/2013, 2:59:53PM BY GONDERIC
REPORT ABUSE
NEXT >
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2013/02/good-riddance-to-pope-benedict-he-was-a-disaster.html#e