Harping on Christian-European 'scientific temper' demeans the profundity of Dharma and Vedic culture -- Rajiv Varma
Indians who find "science" in Vedas or historicize Ramayana or Mahabharata or Puranas, actually end up demeaning our culture and civilization. It is akin to dumbing down a horse to the level of a donkey, so that the horse can fit into a herd of donkeys.
In their classical definitions - "Science" and "History" are disciplines that are contextual to the Western civilization. The evolution of classical "Science" in the West is not an intrinsic development, it is in response to the Abrahamic colonization of the West that began with Emperor Constantine. After 17 centuries, this colonization has been internalized no doubt, and now the then colonized have became the "new" colonizers, but it is colonization nevertheless.
Thus the Science/Philosophy/Knowledge development during Graeco-Roman-Hellenestic pre-Christian era has a certain philosophical disconnect with Renaissance and post-Renaissance "Science". While the Graeco-Roman knowledge development had a natural rhythm, the post-Renaissance science evolved in the backdrop of earlier Dark Ages that was a direct consequence of Christian colonization of the West.
While it may be true that Renaissance thinkers did rely, inter alia, on (for example) Cicero's De Natura Deorum for inspiration in their quest for new knowledge, they never did escape the outer orbit of Christianity. Thus, it explains the formation of now discredited "sciences" such as craniometery, which became the basis of racism and genocide later. There is a certain amount of "irrationality" (or I call it unnaturalness) in the Western "scientific rationalism or temper". That is - "it" is limited to the cartesian plane - and it is not allowed to look beyond it - transcend it, because the Christian God is waiting on the other side, to save the souls.
The efforts like the so-called Noetic Sciences are still disjoint in their conceptualization. Western Science can make giant strides, but it cannot do one thing - it cannot see beyond the "Edge of the Universe" - it does not have the means to - and most importantly it does not have the will to do so. The limitation is provided by the Christian worldview. One can see that the notion of secularism, protects Christianity, God and Jesus business from scrutiny.
In their classical definitions - "Science" and "History" are disciplines that are contextual to the Western civilization. The evolution of classical "Science" in the West is not an intrinsic development, it is in response to the Abrahamic colonization of the West that began with Emperor Constantine. After 17 centuries, this colonization has been internalized no doubt, and now the then colonized have became the "new" colonizers, but it is colonization nevertheless.
Thus the Science/Philosophy/Knowledge development during Graeco-Roman-Hellenestic pre-Christian era has a certain philosophical disconnect with Renaissance and post-Renaissance "Science". While the Graeco-Roman knowledge development had a natural rhythm, the post-Renaissance science evolved in the backdrop of earlier Dark Ages that was a direct consequence of Christian colonization of the West.
While it may be true that Renaissance thinkers did rely, inter alia, on (for example) Cicero's De Natura Deorum for inspiration in their quest for new knowledge, they never did escape the outer orbit of Christianity. Thus, it explains the formation of now discredited "sciences" such as craniometery, which became the basis of racism and genocide later. There is a certain amount of "irrationality" (or I call it unnaturalness) in the Western "scientific rationalism or temper". That is - "it" is limited to the cartesian plane - and it is not allowed to look beyond it - transcend it, because the Christian God is waiting on the other side, to save the souls.
The efforts like the so-called Noetic Sciences are still disjoint in their conceptualization. Western Science can make giant strides, but it cannot do one thing - it cannot see beyond the "Edge of the Universe" - it does not have the means to - and most importantly it does not have the will to do so. The limitation is provided by the Christian worldview. One can see that the notion of secularism, protects Christianity, God and Jesus business from scrutiny.
On the other hand Vedic Rishis have no such handicap. The material and non-material transcend. Hence the sciences that evolved in Ancient India were in tune with the natural rhythm of human civilizational development. The Vedic epistemology established the scope for a Rishi to explore the worlds beyond the "Edge of the Universe" if his/her inquest pointed in that direction. The system never posed any problem in this regard. A student of civilizations can see that harmful sciences like craniometery would have had no chance of forming in a naturally inquisitive culture like India. Thus, Vedic knowledge system is much more comprehensive than Post-Renaissance "officially secular but Christian-nevertheless sciences."
Therefore, finding such (Christian-European) "science" in Vedas is demeaning to the Vedic culture.
It is the colonized Indian mind that sees the (Christian-European) "science" as virtuous, and due to its seep-seated inferiority complex, seeks validation from the West
Therefore, finding such (Christian-European) "science" in Vedas is demeaning to the Vedic culture.
It is the colonized Indian mind that sees the (Christian-European) "science" as virtuous, and due to its seep-seated inferiority complex, seeks validation from the West
Ditto with "history". Again, post-Renaissance academic discipline of "History" is also a false benchmark to aspire to for Indians. Western discipline of History also exists in Christian framework, whose evidentiary parameters are limited to a set that disables a researcher and an academician to go prior to the dates of Genesis. It is made to sound rational, but in essence it is highly irrational. If Indians were to re-write their history based on Christian parameters, all they would get is a molehill and never discover the mountain that they have.
Then, there is another problem that is even more severe. The authors of Ramayana and Mahabharata and the Puranas never intended to tell legends for the purpose of "modernist" historical validation. The purpose of this corpus of literature is adhyatmic (spiritual). These are tools for a human to know his larger Self (capital S). Valmiki never intended for the shrota of Ramayana to start digging graves to find cartesian evidence of existence of Rama or Sita. Ramayana serves only one purpose - viz. spiritual empowerment for the purposes of upholding Dharma. Ramayana serves as a living kernel of the Indic/Hindu civilization. Not a cartesian history book.
I am not against finding historical evidences for the Indian past. But that needs to be a separate discipline. I am not for dumbing down Ramayana and Mahabharata to "fall" to a pseudo-benchmark that our colonialist has set for us.
Ultimately, Western Science will self-destruct and will become extinct, just like the Neo-neanderthal man, because of its own limitation. Graeco-Roman-Hellenestic, Chinese and Vedic Knowledge Systems have a better chance of survival and growth, because of their natural rhythm.
Let us not dumb down our horses to the level of donkeys.
When the term "scientific temper" was inserted in the Indian Constitution (Art. 51a), good ole Panditji clan had no clue that the West had hoodwinked the clan into a herd of donkeys.
When the term "scientific temper" was inserted in the Indian Constitution (Art. 51a), good ole Panditji clan had no clue that the West had hoodwinked the clan into a herd of donkeys.