Published: January 31, 2015 01:59 IST | Updated: January 31, 2015 02:02 IST
Jayanthi waged an ‘everyday battle over policy’
- G. Ananthakrishnan
- Sruthisagar Yamunan
She said ‘no’ to many projects even to then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
Former Union Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan said she had to wage an “everyday battle” to balance the demands of the Cabinet and the wishes of the Congress high command, and the two often had conflicting views on environmental policy. She said ‘no’ to many projects even to then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
A source close to Ms. Natarajan in the Congress said ever since she took over as the Environment Minister from Mr. Jairam Ramesh, she spent most of her time trying to convince senior Cabinet colleagues to take the same position as Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi.
“This meant she had to say ‘no’ to Dr. Singh on clearance of projects which he desperately wanted to sail through to give the economy a boost,” the source said, on condition of anonymity. Dr. Singh had registered his strong disappointment with Ms. Natarajan several times, during which she had to take refuge in the ‘directives’ sent by Mr. Gandhi.
One example was the Niyamgiri project of Vedanta, where, despite opposition from several Ministries, she sat with government law officers and took a hard stand supporting tribal rights in the affidavit of the MoEF in the Supreme Court. “She felt it was a great fortune that the apex court accepted these arguments, and made several trips to temples to thank the gods,” the source said.
On Friday, the former Minister said she was not, however, making any allegation of corruption against the Congress vice-president.
The pressure to sanction projects became stronger as the Lok Sabha polls got closer and Narendra Modi and the BJP launched a scathing attack on the UPA government on the economic front.
“She felt let down by the fact that her decisions were overruled by the Group of Ministers, first led by the then Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee and then by NCP leader Sharad Pawar on many occasions. But even then, she stuck to her method as she thought it was what the party wanted,” the source said.
But the last straw was her removal from the panel of spokespersons just three months before the elections. “She felt her relevance in the party was at stake since the promise of being given an important party position after her resignation was not kept by the high command,” the source said.
Jayanthi Natarajan's Trajectory
Fact File
- › First elected to Rajya Sabha in 1986 and again in 1992
- ›1996: Joins party leaders to form Tamil Maanila Congress
- ›1997: Resigns from Rajya Sabha and re-elected as TMC member. She is appointed Minister of State for Coal, Civil Aviation and Parliamentary Affairs in United Front government at the Centre
- ›July 12, 2011: Jayanthi replaces Jairam Ramesh as Environment Minister in the UPA-led Union government
- ›November 16, 2013: She is asked by Ajay Maken to address media to attack then BJP PM candidate Modi on ‘Snoopgate’ issue
- ›December 19, 2013: She notifies order on the protection of Western Ghats based on Kasturirangan report amid protests
- › December 20, 2013: She is forced to resign as Minister of State for Environment and Forests (Independent Charge) to ‘work for the Congress party’
- › December 21, 2013: Rahul Gandhi addresses FICCI meet: “Many of you have expressed your frustration with environmental clearances that are delaying projects unduly. Environmental and social damage must be avoided, but decisions must also be transparent, timely and fair.”
- › January, 2014: Environment Minister Veerappa Moily clears pending mega projects
- › November 5, 2014: Jayanthi writes to Sonia Gandhi to express her anguish at the treatment meted out to her
Key projects stalled/rejected
Adani group project: Asked by Rahul Gandhi to ‘liase’ with Gujarat Congress’ Deepak Babaria on complaints by NGO, fisherfolk
Vedanta Rs.4,500-crore Bauxite mining in Niyamgiri hillsAugust, 2010: Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi assures Niyamgiri tribals he is their ‘sipahi [soldier] in Delhi’
April, 2013: Supreme Court rules Vedanta must get nod from 12 gram sabhas of Niyamgiri hills
“If the bauxite mining project in any way affects [villagers’] religious rights, especially their right to worship their deity, that right has to be preserved and protected” : SC Bench
January, 2014: MoEF rejects environmental clearance to project
Lavasa township project in Maharashtra November, 2010: MoEF slaps financial penalty on Lavasa for violation of Environment Protection Act, orders fresh EIA
June, 2011: MoEF offers nod to project subject to five preconditions, Lavasa agrees to four (environmental restoration fund, CSR allocation, revised development plan)
November, 2011: MoEF grants clearance after year-long holdover
Nirma Cement plant in Gujarat May, 2011: MoEF seeks relocation of plant from ‘wetland’ site
June, 2013: MoEF postpones expert panel’s pre-monsoon visit to site to ascertain whether it is waterbody or wasteland.
Supreme Court Bench call the postponement “abuse of process of law”
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/jayanthi-waged-an-everyday-battle-over-policy/article6840201.ece
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/jayanthi-waged-an-everyday-battle-over-policy/article6840201.ece
Published: January 31, 2015 01:57 IST | Updated: January 31, 2015 02:01 IST
The old unravels in Congress, but the new is yet to emerge
Varghese K. GeorgeSenior leaders, one after another, are showing signs of restiveness
“If we are as purposeless and directionless in May 2015 as we are today, people will begin to question Rahul Gandhi’s leadership,” a Congress leader had told this writer a few months ago. “Mr. Gandhi will have one year to come up with a new blueprint for the party.”
Mr. Gandhi has been interacting with leaders in recent months and State units have been asked to hold brainstorming sessions on the party’s revival, ahead of the March AICC plenary session
But the grace period available to Mr. Gandhi seems to be shrinking, as senior leaders, one after another, show signs of restiveness. Former Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan’s outburst in a letter to party president Sonia Gandhi that first appeared in The Hindu on Friday took on the Gandhis directly, setting the cat among the pigeons.
Recently, another former Union Minister, Krishna Tirath, had left the party to join the BJP and party general secretary Janardhan Dwivedi’s reported — and later disowned — comments deviated from the party’s official position on Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Party sources that are tuned into the scheme of Mr. Gandhi see Ms. Natarajan’s outburst as nothing more than a minor embarrassment and question the premise that it may disrupt his politics in any fashion. “The principal assertion in Jayanthi’s letter is that Mr. Gandhi intervened on behalf of the poor and tribal people. That is the prerogative not only of the party’s leader but also of an ordinary worker. The party and Mr. Gandhi will continue on that path,” said Randeep Surjewala, party spokesperson.
A churning in the existing power equations in the Congress could be noisy and troublesome, but Mr. Gandhi is reconciled to its inevitability. While taking over as vice-president in January 2013, Mr. Gandhi had expressed his willingness to accommodate the senior generation in his plans. His constant refrain about the party being in the control of a handful of people and the necessity to democratise, targets “those who have captured the Congress party for their personal gratification,” according to a close follower. “Ms. Natarajan’s exit is good riddance.”
But party leaders say he is dismantling old structures without creating the new. “He has not figured out what is to be done though he has broad plans. While he has a lot of floaters around him, he has not found enough people to implement his agenda,” an AICC secretary said.
Sonia’s Congress is unravelling. Rahul’s is nascent.
Former Union Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan quits from the primary membership of the Congress Read here
The Hindu Exclusive: Jayanthi Natarajan's letter to Sonia Gandhi. Read here
Jayanthi's letter rocks capital; Congress evasive, BJP on the offensive. Read here
Jayanthi's resignation from the Congress is unlikely to have any unusual impact on the party’s plummeting fortunes in Tamil Nadu. Read here
BJP denies that Jayanthi Natarajan had met any of their leaders last year. Read here
Congress high command has to respond to Jayanthi's charges: CPI Read here
Prakash Javdekar said it was his duty to review those specific files where extraneous influence had been alleged as per the letter. Read here
Several Congress leaders issued hard-hitting statements against their former colleague Read here
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-old-unravels-in-congress-but-the-new-is-yet-to-emerge/article6840200.ece
Published: January 30, 2015 14:19 IST | Updated: January 31, 2015 01:53 IST
Jayanthi Natarajan quits Congress, ready to face probe
- G. Ananthakrishnan
- SRUTHISAGAR YAMUNAN
Mounting a scathing attack on Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi she said she was “vilified, humiliated and sidelined” by the central leadership.
In a jolt to the Congress, former Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan resigned from the party on Friday and mounted a scathing attack on vice-president Rahul Gandhi for ‘interfering with decision-making’ during her tenure in the UPA II government.
She welcomed any inquiry into decisions taken by her as Minister, including a CBI probe. Ms. Natarajan was responding to Union Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar who said in Pune that all files relating to projects she had mentioned in her letter to party president Sonia Gandhi — which was published exclusively by The Hindu on Friday — would be reviewed.
Addressing a packed press conference here, an emotional Ms. Natarajan said she had always followed the party line and the views of the “high command” in deciding clearances for projects.
“I have no shame in stating that I was always a Gandhi family loyalist to the core….but I was let down by the party,” she said. “I have only followed the party line and rule book on all environment issues. To protect the forest rights of people and the rights of tribals in cases like Vedanta. There was no wrong doing on my part.”
“Specific inputs were received from the office of Rahul Gandhi based on the representation by NGOs raising environment concerns on certain large projects,” she said, but added that the inputs were in the nature of forwarded concerns of tribals and activists. She categorically denied that there could have been any “corruption” involved.
Ms. Natarajan announced that she would resign as trustee of the Tamil Nadu Congress Committee Trust. She said she did not have any idea of joining other political parties for now, including the BJP and Tamil Manila Congress. She had not met anyone from the BJP, she said.
Watch video:
‘Let them probe’
Speaking to reporters here, Ms Natarajan was reacting to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s charge during the Lok Sabha election campaign that industries had to “suffer” a ‘Jayanthi Tax’ to get project clearances.
“But if my own party treats me so badly, why should I blame him? He was in opposition. If Modi is talking of Jayanthi tax, let them investigate,” she said.
On returning to Congress
Asked whether she would reconsider her decision to quit the party if Ms. Sonia intervened, she said the time for such a development was past.
“I did receive calls over the last week from people close to her [Sonia Gandhi] asking me to come and meet her. But I felt it was too late,” she said, adding that her decision to go public resulted from the apathy of the high command to her attempts to reach them.
In fact, she received the first call in over 11 months from the party only when former Shipping Minister G.K. Vasan floated the TMC.
Attack on Rahul
The former Union Minister said the change in stance of the Congress vice-president at a conference of FICCI in December 2013, where he virtually blamed her Ministry for the bottleneck in clearing big-ticket projects worth millions, came as a “thunderbolt” from the blue.
Former Union Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan quits from the primary membership of the Congress Read here
The Hindu Exclusive: Jayanthi Natarajan's letter to Sonia Gandhi. Read here
Jayanthi's letter rocks capital; Congress evasive, BJP on the offensive. Read here
Jayanthi's resignation from the Congress is unlikely to have any unusual impact on the party’s plummeting fortunes in Tamil Nadu. Read here
BJP denies that Jayanthi Natarajan had met any of their leaders last year. Read here
Congress high command has to respond to Jayanthi's charges: CPI Read here
Prakash Javdekar said it was his duty to review those specific files where extraneous influence had been alleged as per the letter. Read here
Several Congress leaders issued hard-hitting statements against their former colleague Read here
Digvijay charge
On the reaction of Congress general secretary, Digvijay Singh, that she was “lying” and that Mr. Gandhi would never interfere in the manner stated, Ms. Natarajan said she would like to keep the conversation civilised and said she had all the documents to back each of her claim.
Jayanthi Natarajan's Trajectory
Fact File
- › First elected to Rajya Sabha in 1986 and again in 1992
- ›1996: Joins party leaders to form Tamil Maanila Congress
- ›1997: Resigns from Rajya Sabha and re-elected as TMC member. She is appointed Minister of State for Coal, Civil Aviation and Parliamentary Affairs in United Front government at the Centre
- ›July 12, 2011: Jayanthi replaces Jairam Ramesh as Environment Minister in the UPA-led Union government
- ›November 16, 2013: She is asked by Ajay Maken to address media to attack then BJP PM candidate Modi on ‘Snoopgate’ issue
- ›December 19, 2013: She notifies order on the protection of Western Ghats based on Kasturirangan report amid protests
- › December 20, 2013: She is forced to resign as Minister of State for Environment and Forests (Independent Charge) to ‘work for the Congress party’
- › December 21, 2013: Rahul Gandhi addresses FICCI meet: “Many of you have expressed your frustration with environmental clearances that are delaying projects unduly. Environmental and social damage must be avoided, but decisions must also be transparent, timely and fair.”
- › January, 2014: Environment Minister Veerappa Moily clears pending mega projects
- › November 5, 2014: Jayanthi writes to Sonia Gandhi to express her anguish at the treatment meted out to her
Key projects stalled/rejected
Adani group project: Asked by Rahul Gandhi to ‘liase’ with Gujarat Congress’ Deepak Babaria on complaints by NGO, fisherfolk
Vedanta Rs.4,500-crore Bauxite mining in Niyamgiri hillsAugust, 2010: Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi assures Niyamgiri tribals he is their ‘sipahi [soldier] in Delhi’
April, 2013: Supreme Court rules Vedanta must get nod from 12 gram sabhas of Niyamgiri hills
“If the bauxite mining project in any way affects [villagers’] religious rights, especially their right to worship their deity, that right has to be preserved and protected” : SC Bench
January, 2014: MoEF rejects environmental clearance to project
Lavasa township project in Maharashtra November, 2010: MoEF slaps financial penalty on Lavasa for violation of Environment Protection Act, orders fresh EIA
June, 2011: MoEF offers nod to project subject to five preconditions, Lavasa agrees to four (environmental restoration fund, CSR allocation, revised development plan)
November, 2011: MoEF grants clearance after year-long holdover
Nirma Cement plant in Gujarat May, 2011: MoEF seeks relocation of plant from ‘wetland’ site
June, 2013: MoEF postpones expert panel’s pre-monsoon visit to site to ascertain whether it is waterbody or wasteland.
Supreme Court Bench call the postponement “abuse of process of law”
Printable version | Jan 31, 2015 5:50:28 AM |
- Raj KumarKeeping in view the larger public interest those documents must be checked by competent authorities and why was she silent since then ?about 9 hours ago · (5) · (2) · reply (0) ·
- Dr TitusMaking comments without going through the entire story is unjustifiable. Ms Natarajan, in her statement, reiterated that "inputs from Mr Gandhi on the projects were in the nature of forwarding concerns of tribals and activists". Ms Natarajan firmly denied that there could have been any corruption involved in his moves. This statement justifies Rahul's interference.about 9 hours ago · (6) · (7) · reply (0) ·
- DenisHow Gandhi family was to Congress Govt was how RSS is to BJP Govt. is ! While Gandhi family is still claims to be a political entity and the mud on its face is washable, it is RSS which claims to be apolitical. Both are bad for Indian democracy though both have power to change for the good.about 9 hours ago · (13) · (18) · reply (0) ·Points415
- SriniThis is what should happen to all chamchas...and would happen. These chamchas instead of serving the nation and taking decisions in the interest of the nation have been working to please members of one family. We should send such loyalists to jail if any wrongdoing was proved.about 10 hours ago · (25) · (1) · reply (0) ·Points325
- ShankarIt is a good riddance for Congress. She was one of the most inefficient ministers and brought disrespect to the government by delaying environmental clearances. She cannot win even a ward election and now after enjoying power she throws mud on the very people who supporter her despite her lack of skills.about 11 hours ago · (8) · (16) · reply (0) ·
- V. RamaswamiIsn't this just one more instance of "following high command" and compromising one's own integrity and beliefs in the process ? Does it deserve any public sympathy really ?about 11 hours ago · (22) · (1) · reply (0) ·Points895
- bhagawanNeeding Rahul Gandhi's input in all files relating to the dept. under Mrs. Natarajan was illegal-he was a nobody in the Govt; the NDA Govt. should review all such files and expose the "importance" the dud was given, holding up or affecting so many important decisions affecting a variety of environmental issues. This is probably the "tip of the iceberg" in this scandal of Rahul to be considered "important" in UPA 2 (or even earlier).about 11 hours ago · (31) · (1) · reply (0) ·Points415
- Vittal Vittalms.Jayanthi's name appeared on the matter of delay in clearing green projects for some reasons known to every body and also to her self. She was accused of delaying things expecting some favours from beneficiaries Her sacking and side lining was done by the young blood Rahul , but against the rules that Rahul had access in dealing with Government affairs is true may be for a good cause.about 11 hours ago · (1) · (15) · reply (0) ·Points3555
- P.P.I appreciated many a times when Jayanti Natarajan came on Channels projecting the views of Congress Party as a Spokesperson of the party. She has done a commendable job as the Spokesperson of the Party she represented. I have witnessed her performance as a Minister in Parliament. Her grievance should have been addressed sensibly so that Congress may not lose an able, energetic, capable worker. Bad luck to Congress Party.about 11 hours ago · (13) · (2) · reply (0) ·
- kasthuri ranganShe could better her prospects by joining BJP. It would benefit TN.about 11 hours ago · (3) · (7) · reply (0) ·Points11480
- kasthuri ranganAtleast now would the still minority (not religious) supporters of Congress realize the true intention of INC - Italian National Conglomorate?about 12 hours ago · (14) · (4) · reply (0) ·Points11480
- Jyothi KumarMost of the senior leaders in congress do not have the guts to comment on the so called new generation leader who run over the ladders purely becasuse his family background. Congress is to suffer lot more to come out of this sycophants.about 12 hours ago · (17) · (0) · reply (0) ·
- Venkat LoganathanOur Political system is like that. What to do?about 12 hours ago · (1) · (6) · reply (0) ·Points3625
- N Bhashyam Retired scientist interested in world peace and friendship.Areas in interest are Current Affairs, R&D, Management, Religion,Technology and Mathematics.Keeping quiet so long and now suddenly coming out possibly looking for political rehabilitation...who will back a losing horseabout 12 hours ago · (4) · (3) · reply (0) ·Points170
- Sujith PanikkarJayanti Natarajan may have "disclosed" facts, the compulsions behind the timing of which is questionable. This also brings to light a certain level of incompetence in her role as minister which she was supposed to perform with diligence and integrity. Beyond this, the larger picture of extra- constitutional powers undermining our democracy and the need for safeguards against such situations comes to the fore.about 12 hours ago · (5) · (0) · reply (0) ·Points410
- anandWhat do you think of Royal family of great 100 years old congress. This is usual thing for all in congress and each n every member of family is born with such great silver spoon which can be shared with Damad and others too. Shame on them and party which always praises the familyabout 12 hours ago · (8) · (1) · reply (0) ·
- RahulDonn't be surprised if now (after the allegations) Rahul baba suddenly goes missing from the Delhi poll campaigns, supposedly on another long holiday (till the debate dies and trail of proofs is either guttted in fire at some record office or public forgets about the family managing country's affairs on their own whims and interests.about 13 hours ago · (14) · (0) · reply (0) ·Points4980
- Vidyala Venkataraman at TIDCOShe cannot win a panchayat member / councilor seat. All these 30 years she enjoyed MP post. It is totally unfair. Congress is not the loser by her quitting. Rather people like PC should be shown the door by Congress High Command.about 13 hours ago · (19) · (56) · reply (0) ·
- Ramakrishnasayee SubramanianJayanthi Natarajan has left the sinking ship. Her reasons seem to be strong and genuine.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/jayanthi-natarajan-quits-congress-attacks-rahul-gandhi/article6838682.ece